1164
() 🔥   BURN,  LOOT,  MURDER  🔥
posted ago by ceIlardoor ago by ceIlardoor +1164 / -0
Comments (275)
sorted by:
155
Patrick_Bateman_ 155 points ago +157 / -2

does HE have the balls to do it?

40
EvolutionIsFake 40 points ago +40 / -0

We could actually meme Big Mike's campaign into the ground, by posting stickers of his balls bouncing out of his tucker while he was doing that dance, on gas station pumps, next to the "I did that" ones...

Wake people up to the fact that this thing has junk down there. Lots of normies are turned off by degenerate crap like that

Edit: Here's a link with plenty of video/pics of his balls bouncing out of his pants, for all you faggots that are unaware:

29
wololo 29 points ago +29 / -0

I had never seen that clip of Joan Rivers before saying we've already had the first gay president in Barack because Michelle is transgender. And then she died eight weeks later. Yikes. Never saw the clips of Barry slipping up and calling her "Michael" either.

1
Truthseeker0120 1 point ago +1 / -0

I saw them.

1
Texanpureblood 1 point ago +1 / -0

During a dnc speech she wears a Micheal necklace

19
BigMikesSwingingCock 19 points ago +19 / -0

You can find a lot of pictures of my protruding penis. It's the worlds worst kept secret.

5
BoatingAccident 5 points ago +5 / -0

But you can’t find a one of it preggy

6
NateBedfordForrest 6 points ago +6 / -0

Those kids are the dr.s kids. The scariest movie ever on YouTube showed this years ago. KJ ozbourne.

4
Sticky 4 points ago +4 / -0

Link doesn’t play?

1
EvolutionIsFake 1 point ago +1 / -0

Works for me and others

1
ConstutionalCarry 1 point ago +1 / -0

The fucking millennials and lots of gen-z would vote for Big Mike since they'd consider it the woke thing to do. Being a tranny isn't a bad thing to them.

1
EvolutionIsFake 1 point ago +1 / -0

If 80+ million Americans support Trannys and don't think Trannys are a bad thing, then we deserve a Tranny president. There's no easy way back once we are this far. It means our nation failed, and it deserves to rot

1
spezisapedo2 1 point ago +1 / -0

sadly that wouldnt help. the 81 million "folkx" love "womxn" with balls

26
DrWeeGee 26 points ago +27 / -1

"THICC DICK CHICK ENERGY"

- Campaign Slogan, probably

6
EatMyBallsAmerican 6 points ago +6 / -0

Your slogan has the Big Dick Energy needed for her to win

5
blubberdong 5 points ago +5 / -0

A foot of shaft and a bucket of balls and you're still calling him her??

4
EatMyBallsAmerican 4 points ago +4 / -0

Im trying to be non gender binding fluid

2
SouthernParadise 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gonna need the thicc crude for that.

2
jpower 2 points ago +3 / -1

Michael will need Michael Avenatti as running mate

2
chickeninoven 2 points ago +2 / -0

A foot of shaft and a bucket of balls

Is that like the "a chicken in every pot" thing?

1
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 1 point ago +1 / -0

Best punk band name ever.

4
Notch__Johnson 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Chick's with Dicks in '26" if she wants to run in the midterms

2
magalee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Read that as Thicc Dick Cheney AKA Liz Cheney

12
South_Florida_Guy 12 points ago +12 / -0

They'll rig the erection!!

2
Neonentity 2 points ago +2 / -0

Underrated comment.

7
BigMikesSwingingCock 7 points ago +7 / -0

I have gigantic balls and an even larger cock to back it up.

2
TrumpsWall 2 points ago +2 / -0

But your IQ is micro 😆

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
Magabirdlady2 5 points ago +5 / -0

Could cause a big cat fight between Killary and Michele.

7
Joey14 7 points ago +7 / -0

I’ll take big Mike for TKO in the first

75
dahdahdah_dahditdah 75 points ago +76 / -1

With Joe they proved they can install whoever they want, even if they are unpopular and unelectable. So why not?

29
FliesTheFlag 29 points ago +29 / -0

iTs beCauSe PPl vOtEd agAiNSt DruMPF, nOT FoR PeDo JoE. 81 GoRiLLiON

14
OrangeFruitGood 14 points ago +14 / -0

That's a lot of gorilla votes

5
TrumpoWon2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's a lot of bananas

2
4
FliesTheFlag 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wholly shit, can't even make that kinda shit up! Michael LaVaughn Robinsons nickname is from a Banana, Big Dick Mike!

2
TrumpoWon2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wtf, lol

2
JamesBlomey 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not letting Gorillas vote is Fascist, Le Bigot!

1
AdmrlNelson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Easy there Mr Pool

1
Tellman125 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly. The Democrats still use the decades-long pre-Trump method of all the candidate's talk being 90% scripted and rehearsed and/or teleprompted, and letting media coverage (i.e. obedient journalist-friends) and campaign ads do a large part of the work. That's how it was from the '60s until Trump in 2015, with his largely extemporaneous speeches and his constant interactions with the press. Even the state-level MAGA candidates like DeSantis and Kristi Noem broke away from that, and have shown that it works and that the Trump way is what people prefer.

1
cupocovfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

You know... I am not sure if I like how right you just might be... sad

0
Barthaneous 0 points ago +1 / -1

AND furthermore if He runs against Trump he will win.. He will go full throttle in sending as many people out to block voters, send in mail-in ballots and will prolong voting days by weeks again. And the left who loved Obama will swarm in thinking there will be better days .

It wont be a good thing. Not at all.

63
UpTrump 63 points ago +63 / -0

That's always been the plan. She's not nearly as unpopular as potato so it's easier to steal

39
MR_FROG_TRUMP 39 points ago +39 / -0

They better be ready for an avalanche of Big Mike tranny memes.

13
LetoAtreides 13 points ago +13 / -0

Them pushing LGBT acceptance suddenly makes sense lol

4
Retarddit_Refugee 4 points ago +4 / -0

The whole tranny pushing agenda started in the Obuttfuck years. Transvestites were not a new thing, but pushing non-stop discussion about them started then. Republicans have taken the bait by joining that conversation. Their fraction of a percent of the mentally ill faggot population wouldn't be growing if not for Obummer and his linebacker husband.

2
MR_FROG_TRUMP 2 points ago +2 / -0

For sure. The Obaggots were just the mouthpieces, though.

Powerful degenerates wanted to use LGBT as a vehicle to normalize pedophilia so they propped up the Obums for office.

1
Cuetardian 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's exactly why.

6
Husky 6 points ago +6 / -0

Maybe that's why they're so desperate to normalize it

0
TX4TW 0 points ago +1 / -1

They will probably come clean with big Mike’s status and say vote for her or be a bigot.

15
Mamapedia 15 points ago +15 / -0

Many useful idiots would be ecstatic. Think of the intersectionality: black, trans, gay, womyn, adoptive parent...covers lots of bases!

2
Sticky 2 points ago +2 / -0

They will cover the lie by saying America wasn’t ready…

6
meme_kat 6 points ago +7 / -1

The very obvious question that should be asked is what are her qualifications?

What has Michelle Obama accomplished in life that makes her qualified for the job?

Simply being the first lady of the president of the united states while offering some experience does not make her qualified in my mind.

This is a similar case of Hillary Clinton riding on Bill Clinton's coat tails then being handed a Senate seat in New York after the convenient and timely death of John F. Kennedy Jr who had been groomed for a political run. As detestable as Hillary is she was a lawyer with over 15 years of experience before Bill got elected President. When Bill left office in 2000, Hillary was handed a Senate seat and did not try to run for POTUS immediately. As incompetent and power mad as Hillary was she moved upward incrementally into positions with greater responsibility: lawyer > first lady > senate > secretary of state

Compare this to Michelle Obama.

Michelle Obama is a former lawyer and graduate of Princeton and Harvard Law School. She hasn't practiced law in 30 years. In the decade before Obama was elected President, Michelle Obama was mainly employed in positions relating to "Community Affairs" which is essentially a glorified publicist. Since Obama left office she hasn't held a real job with substantial responsibility.

Michelle Obama is even less qualified than George W Bush

3
TheThreeSeashells 3 points ago +3 / -0

Since Obama left office she hasn't held a real job with substantial responsibility.

(S)he has also never been challenged the way she would in a political scenario. (S)he repeatedly put her foot in her/his mouth when Barack was president and they quickly realized (s)he had to be very closely monitored and managed.

Once someone steps foot in the political arena, even with the propagandist media on their side, that all changed. Big Mike has proven to have very thin skin and repeatedly put her/his foot in her/his mouth. That's magnified 100 fold during a campaign. Suddenly the people who for years were told that Big Mike is so likeable and personable start waking up to realize that was complete bullshit.

Even worse, it has the similar effect to when someone who was built up to be a terrific person or just a likeable person turns out to be complete shit and is exposed as such in a very public way: They fall even harder.

1
meme_kat 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'm looking at this from a pure perspective of experience holding positions of management and responsibility.

Hillary Clinton:

  • lawyer (18 years) > FLOTUS (8 years) > US senator (8 years) > 2008 failed presidential run > secretary of state (4 years) > 2016 failed presidential run

Michelle Obama:

  • lawyer (5 years) > Community Affairs positions (15 years) > FLOTUS (8 years) > ???? ( 6+ years) > 2024 presidential run

If you're comparing these two resumes, two things stand out. Love or hate Hillary as a person or as a competent person, her career path shows a greater level of experience, responsibility and difficulty.

Michelle Obama is effectively untested and hasn't held a real job with high level responsibility that makes her qualified to run the US government.

The reason that Democrats would want to run Michelle Obama is because she has no real track record of being in a leadership role making difficult decisions which could create unfavorability or negative press.

1
TheThreeSeashells 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, I'm looking at it that way, too. Two stand out in my mind. A few years back the Left wanted to run Caroline Kennedy for some position. I think it may have been a house seat in NYC. They were all excited about it, touting her (thin) resume which was essentially a college diploma and the Kennedy name. They had her do an interview with a friendly NYC talk show host in a live setting in front of an audience and she completely bombed. She was never heard from again.

In Kentucky they thought they could run Ashley Judd for a Senate seat. After all she showed up at UK basketball games pretending to be a fan, much like she pretended to actually have been raised in KY. TV cameras and announcers would fawn all over her appearances at games, claiming she was a "real fan." She was well known, perceived as "likeable", attractive, and since she was an actress she should have no trouble handling the spotlight. The media would have you believe at the time that she was the most famous and highly regarded Kentuckian in history. The Senate race would be tough, but she was the one to put up the fight.

Then they rolled her out for some event prior to actually naming her as a candidate. Some reporters asked her a few really softball questions for an hour or two and she completely whiffed. That was that. Her name was not only never mentioned again, but she conspicuously was no longer the "Belle of the Ball" at UK basketball games anymore. Not only did the party dump her, but the media did as well.

My point is that the idea of some of these people as politicians usually works out a lot better than the actual attempt to do it. Once that curtain is pulled back and everyone gets a look at the real "Oz", it all falls apart.

I would not be shocked to see the same happen if Big Mike actually does give it a go. (S)he will crumble at the first semi-tough question...and it won't take long. Xiden got away with hiding during his "campaign." That's not likely to ever work again.

1
Themis595 1 point ago +1 / -0

No substantial responsibility? She goes to Target!

-3
Hunters10incher -3 points ago +2 / -5

Not sure if your genuinely wondering but she has a law degree from Harvard. That's more of an educational "qualification" than some presidents or candidates out there. I don't think that's the right approach to discredit her.

2
meme_kat 2 points ago +3 / -1

Check the edited comment above.

Michelle Obama is 58 years old and was born on Jan 17, 1964. She graduated from Princeton in 1985 at the age of 21 and graduated from Harvard Law in 1988 at the age of 24. However there is this caveat.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_obama#Career

She continues to hold her law license, but as she no longer needs it for her work, she has kept it on a voluntary inactive status since 1993.[80][81]

Michelle Obama practiced law for less than five years and quit at the age of 29. Between 1993-2008 she mainly held positions related to "Community Affairs" which essentially is a publicist handling promotions and social affairs. Being first lady is effectively the same job. Since leaving the White House, she hasn't really held a job or any commitment with management responsibility.

The only job she held with any real management responsibility was 25 years ago.

In 1996, Obama served as the Associate Dean of Student Services at the University of Chicago, where she developed the university's Community Service Center.

While having social skills is a great attribute, it does not provide experience running an organization.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
FireannDireach 4 points ago +4 / -0

He's not even as popular as Hillary, and half the party hates her ass for what she did to Bernie, twice.

3
cciv 3 points ago +3 / -0

She's only popular as Obama's wife. Just like Hillary, her appeal will tank once she runs for office.

2
BoatingAccident 2 points ago +2 / -0

Doubt it. Retards love celebrities and she is one. Muh emotional vote

46
MAGAnic316 46 points ago +46 / -0

Ah yes, Barrack’s forth and fifth terms. Yay us

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
12
HeavyMetalPatriot 12 points ago +12 / -0

Joe Rogan was pushing this months ago. Said she's going to win if she runs because how popular she is. Apparently, Big Mike has been campaign events all over the country via her book tours and building her (Obama 2.0) political machine.

5
Pissed_American 5 points ago +5 / -0

He's such a moron

1
HeavyMetalPatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except he's probably right. Since 2020 was never fixed, the future could easily be "Trump wins in Nov 2024 and Big Mike gets installed in Jan 2025"

1
Pissed_American 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's not a moron for predicting big Mike. He's a moron for wanting big Mike.

1
HeavyMetalPatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed.

0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
4
SouthernParadise 4 points ago +4 / -0

The steal will be easier to believe if they use her. That’s what they’re hoping for.

1
HeavyMetalPatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bingo!

2
Cyer6 2 points ago +2 / -0

Me too. The leftists love the Obama's, especially her (him). Mike would get the black vote, the white suburban liberal women and your average disgruntled dem voter right now. They'd also get their theft machine running at top performance because BLM would go all in on the cheat.

3
Basedsliceofwinning 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, I was surprised she wasn't the choice this past election. After Floyd and everything else, the vote for me or you're a racist/sexist would be a successful campaign.

2
__bryan 2 points ago +2 / -0

The CIA's fourth and fifth terms, well actually it's more like their ninth and 10th terms.

39
JohnBarronGalt 39 points ago +39 / -0

Penised.

7
Retard_Strength 7 points ago +7 / -0

Thick. Girthy. Veiny. Fully Penised.

1
MyPersonalExp 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thick, ropey skeets.

Very disrespectful.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
26
Taqiyya_Mockingbird 26 points ago +27 / -1

In case you wondered what Chewbacca would look like if he shaved.

20
Magabirdlady2 20 points ago +20 / -0

I just can’t see her being stuck in the WH. I got the impression she couldn’t wait to get the heck out of there. Frankly I am surprised they stayed together.

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
5
Magabirdlady2 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah.

5
Chickapede 5 points ago +5 / -0

Big Mike is too lazy to run a campaign and too angry to connect with voters. Also Big Mike is even less vetted than Barry and has little real job experience. Big Mike's accomplishment in the last 20 years was ruining school lunches for growing children.

3
Basedsliceofwinning 3 points ago +3 / -0

I love when she said she has never been proud of America, despite the country electing her own husband.

Still, she'd track well with the harpies and the suburban liberal white women.

2
TheThreeSeashells 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep. They're making millions off of all the kickbacks. Why would they bother to install Big Mike? They can just find someone else who they can control and not someone who thinks they're already more powerful than the controllers.

19
Spawnlingman 19 points ago +20 / -1

So the new world order will be run by a black tranny.

This is literally the anti-christ.

4
BigIronBigIron 4 points ago +4 / -0

Errrbody on the dance floor, put your hands together for President Baphomet!

2
BoatingAccident 2 points ago +2 / -0

Whore of Babylon actually

15
Znut55 15 points ago +15 / -0

Last I checked Trump was elected overwhelmingly BECAUSE people woke up to what Obama was doing to this country. It's where it all began before Joe stepped in to move their agenda forward with many of the SAME Obama idiots working in his administration and behind the scenes.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
Pissed_American 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not really. Trump won because people despise Hillary. Normies don't know what Obama did.

14
Benwa1985-2 14 points ago +14 / -0

Wonder if she will finally come out as trans to appease the far left.

1
__bryan 1 point ago +1 / -0

that would actually be hilarious. it would be nothing but I told you so from Republicans forever. Hell I bet some Republicans would join up with BLM to burn stuff down and both sides we just be laughing the whole time.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Benwa1985-2 1 point ago +1 / -0

😂

12
CJ74U2NV 12 points ago +12 / -0

Libtards, especially birthing libtards, would flock to this beast.

2
censorthisss 2 points ago +2 / -0

One of my liberal relatives asked me back in 2020 what I thought about Big Mike running for President.

I asked if he was serious and he said yes. He thinks she would make a great President because "she's already been in the white house and knows how it works."

Thank God I only see him once or twice a year. Fucking idiot.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
11
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 11 points ago +12 / -1

Big doubt.

Big Mike would have to submit to a physical examination.

Everyone would know he was penised.

3
Rusty_Shackleford 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m sure they can find a doc who’d lie. Would be easier to fake than a birth certificate.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
0
TommyLasordasBallBag 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yeah, you spelled Michael wrong. Don't disrespect Mike's missile.

10
Pats5x 10 points ago +10 / -0

she would win because white suburban moms felt good about voting for the kenyan, and they'll feel doubly good about voting for Big Mike....

11
HeavyMetalPatriot 11 points ago +11 / -0

White women will HAPPILY destroy America for a couple of internet virtue points.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
5
PhoneBandit 5 points ago +5 / -0

If it's her vs Trump, their campaign is simply going to be, "Don't vote for a meanie!" and it's going to work. I bet she gets more votes than Biden did.

3
ParticleCannon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Or a free donut and lottery ticket

7
EJay_Scott 7 points ago +7 / -0

Let's see the long-form birth certificate for this one.

7
smartass 7 points ago +7 / -0

Wookies are ineligible

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
lixa 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not the trans oppressing women yet again by skipping over that.

6
Its_Morbin_Time 6 points ago +6 / -0

Big dick energy lol

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
Dictator_Bob 6 points ago +6 / -0

Joe Rogan begged her to run a while back and a few weeks later the woke mob attacked him anyways. He'll come crawling back to her begging her to run again. If they can't get Tulsi to come out on the populist wave.

2
KonyHawk_ProSlaver 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's really a dolt sometimes.

1
Pissed_American 1 point ago +1 / -0

He says what he thinks will make him popular. He is too agreeable.

2
Basedsliceofwinning 2 points ago +2 / -0

Liberals hate Tulsi. She would never win a primary.

1
Dictator_Bob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Liberalism in America doesn't exist. They've disenfranchised "liberals" who are either lost in the woods or heading over here. A Pied Piper like Tulsi is an option to bring back the "Bernie Bros" (which includes birthing-persons, ironically) to rebuild their fractured base.

6
Talus033 6 points ago +6 / -0

is this guy serious?

5
Throwingway22 5 points ago +5 / -0

The top of the democrat politicians are deeply unpopular "women."

5
UpvoteBot 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oh god, I can hear it now. “Her election would be so historical!!! Our first black trans-woman president!!!”

4
honkdeezee 4 points ago +4 / -0

Any policy or just running on a name, from her husband's "accomplishments"?

3
honkdeezee 3 points ago +3 / -0

Running on your husband's name isn't very progressive lol

1
Basedsliceofwinning 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe she'd divorce him and then run. As an independent woman. Or some shit.

It honestly what Hillary should have done. Hillary Rodham gets more votes than Hillary Clinton.

2
KonyHawk_ProSlaver 2 points ago +2 / -0

Paging Ms. Clinton...

4
GlitchyMcGlitchface 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't think she will, for the same reason Oprah didn't run. There is no point in damaging their "brand" by getting drug through the mud during an election

1
Pissed_American 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol who's gonna drag her in the mud? The media?

2
GlitchyMcGlitchface 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't forget it was Harris that was the media darling and heir apparent by the establishment going into the primaries and it took one Dem on the debate stage to not fall in line and completely fuck her campaign up to the point she had to drop out before a single vote was cast. Why would a millionaire who makes money off of just having the name Obama risk something like that happening to her for really no benefit

1
Ghostphaez 1 point ago +1 / -0

And who would even do that?? The mainstream media would treat her even more gently than they do Creepy Joe - they freaking love her! Fox would be super mild - no way would they risk being called raycisss. Non-mainstream Right wing media - Breitbart, Gateway Pundit, et al - would do the heavy lifting for our side, but they have limited reach among normies (as the Hunter Biden laptop story in 2020 proved - no one outside of our bubble even paid attention!).

1
GlitchyMcGlitchface 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lil gay Pete is eyeing up the Whitehouse already, newsom is buying ads in Florida to get his name more out there others are pushing aoc name out there as laughable as that is. I don't think these people are just going to lay down and roll out the red carpet for her. They see blood in the water and want their shot. Sure the media will do everything in their power to get her through but she has to decide is it worth risking her easy life with her money and fawning press coverage spend a year fighting her own side and then likely face off against Trump who won't give a shit about the media calling him a racist when he hits her. I'm just not seeing the upside for her other than just seeking more power, and even so they can control any Dem president just by going on the media and saying what she thinks they should be doing

1
Ghostphaez 1 point ago +1 / -0

Newsom is the biggest empty suit of all time - even makes Obama look substantive in comparison! No way the Dems are picking him. He's not even the right color for a Dem - Biden will likely be the last White Dem presidential candidate.

No way in hell they nominate Pete - too young , too White, and the Dem establishment isn't stupid enough to run a gay right now. They have to wait for the tranny GenZ sheeple to get older and become a larger share of the voting population.

1
GlitchyMcGlitchface 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh don't get me wrong I completely agree that if she ran she would get the nomination but I don't believe it would just be handed to her. There are to many people from the new guard fighting to become the next big leader of the party and I doubt they will just sit back for another "her turn" candidate even if the establishment tells everyone to fall in line

4
ParticleCannon 4 points ago +4 / -0

But they've already done "first black man as president"

4
BigIronBigIron 4 points ago +4 / -0

"All this for a damn flag."

4
kompromatdotwin 4 points ago +4 / -0

Joel Gilbert, the dude that made the awesome Trayvon Hoax documentary, just released a trailer for his newest documentary..

He also thinks Michelle is going to run in 2024 and lays it all out...

Trailer is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSMxuALxyW4

3
HeavyMetalPatriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Worth watching.

2
Freedombunker 2 points ago +2 / -0

I watched about 10 seconds of that trailer and I think I just threw up a little

4
MythArcana 4 points ago +4 / -0

We already had one liberal black man for 8 years, not doing it again.

3
Destroy_WithLove 3 points ago +3 / -0

I hope she does it. I'd like to see the run-off between her and Howard Stern.

3
DeplorableLA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hope not. I know everyone talks about how popular she is but I don’t see it. She’s nasty.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
DeplorableLA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes and a few on the right sing her praises, I think Kellyanne is one of them.

3
Yeeessss 3 points ago +3 / -0

It really makes no sense. If MO wanted to be Prez it would make sense to wait until at least 2028 if not 2032 when the Dems will likely have a much better chance.

Why run in what could be an R+10 or more national environment? Why risk getting the stink of the Biden administration on you and your legacy?

All these things and more make a 2024 run highly unlikely. Even if she did run she’s not that likable and has none of the charisma of her husband so I’m not sure it would be a slam dunk. The black woman card is also losing a lot of its luster lately.

1
lixa 1 point ago +1 / -0

2032?! You think the Ds in their current form will still exist then AND there are still elections? I don't. It's probably one or the other.

1
Yeeessss 1 point ago +1 / -0

I get what you’re saying but it’s a little dramatic. The two party system will perpetuate itself as per usual unless something really crazy happens.

Personally I predict Trump will win in 2024 and there will be a further realignment of the two parties. Neoconservatism and neoliberalism will both be dead, the Dems will go full class warfare. This won’t work at all at first but then eventually a term or two down the line there will be a depression and if timed right should sweep the Dems back into power for a while.

3
DiamondDroid 3 points ago +3 / -0

You have to vote for "her" or you're transphobic.

3
bluedevilga 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://youtu.be/WHTPLpY8mBI

Have to do the man check

3
MF_Goggles 3 points ago +3 / -0

And we still wouldn't have a female president.

3
Magasaurus_Rex_1 3 points ago +3 / -0

This one really deserves the Penised flair

2
geekesmind 2 points ago +2 / -0

She will get votes on 2 reasons

She's black and a woman

She could say gas going to be 20 dollars a gallon and people would still vote for her cause of them two reasons

2
Pissed_American 2 points ago +2 / -0

Except the woman part is not true

2
Les_Deplorables 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, she could get Ellen to run as VP.

2
empiretc 2 points ago +2 / -0

HE will not win....

-1
PhoneBandit -1 points ago +2 / -3

As much as I hate it, he would crush Trump.

2
Pissed_American 2 points ago +2 / -0

In a Dick measuring contest ?

2
PhoneBandit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol

1
TeeBP 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe a few years ago, but with the economy in such a godawful place and dems promoting child grooming a lot of people have woken up to dem bs. The only factor that could get her a win is vote rigging.

1
PhoneBandit 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you underestimate how white suburban women vote. It's mostly whoever gives them the best vibes.

2
TAIWANNUMBERONE 2 points ago +2 / -0

If it's another white person the riggers aren't going to be as enthusiastic, that's for sure.

2
Truthseeker0120 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh God, please do..🙂

2
RedditStillSucks 2 points ago +3 / -1

This would appeal to the brainwashed NPC's that say "oh I love her"

...because the TV and the internet pumps them full of what to believe.

2
Sdhoppy71 2 points ago +2 / -0

Never going to happen in 2024 because how does Barrack let her do that to Joe. The optics would look bad and the Obamas are all about optics. Unless they can figure out a way for him to not run again but what do you do about Kamala. My guess is what I said awhile ago. They are going to try and get her 2 plus terms.

2
Jecovidwitness 2 points ago +2 / -0

Leftists will applaud this because he’s some kind of YAS QUEEN to them, but other than being Barry’s power bottom he doesn’t have much else going for him. He HATES white people and can’t even bother hiding it. He HATES America. He HATES kids lunches. Moderates won’t go for it.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
CB_Fonoti 2 points ago +2 / -0

Big mike ain't got it...💩💩

2
magaspif 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think she would want that kind of job -you can't just pretend to be president, even as badly as Joe is doing; you are stuck and you don't have a life.

As comfortable as he is right now? hard to believe.

2
FitOfficial 2 points ago +2 / -0

Xe better tuck or that thing will be flopping everywhere again.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0