Comments (144)
sorted by:
Stallion 181 points ago +182 / -1
  1. I will work my ass off and die 5 years earlier than you in order to enable this privilege for you.
nozonozo 103 points ago +103 / -0

The differences between the sexes is something we should all embrace and be grateful for. It makes the world go round.

rossiFan 40 points ago +40 / -0

All of our differences are like that. As opposed to pretending we are all grey AND one is more entitled than the other? That doesn't compute.

EvolutionIsFake 24 points ago +27 / -3

Men & Women complement each other, physically and emotionally.
One won't survive without the other.
Together, we form one.

We have differences, but combined, we are whole and complete.

Edit: Just as God intended when he create man & woman 7000 years ago.

VoidWanderer 6 points ago +6 / -0

How long is a day to God?

DCdeplorable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or what i can get past is, our current understanding of science basically puts our perception and consciousness in a quantum entanglement with reality. Things exist in superposition until they are observed in a particular way, which seems to "lock it in".

Now its a bit circular because there's no way to prove this happens without our involvement (because who but humans could measure and explain such a result?)

But reality as we know it is tied into our consciousness, and we dont have a clue what consciousness truly is. Before we were truly human - meaning either before we evolved something to let us escape chimp life, or ate a magical fruit of knowledge - time has no intrinsic meaning. Space and time are the same... basically there's no disproving the idea that everything happened all at once, until humans slowed it down by thinking about it all.

VoidWanderer 6 points ago +6 / -0

So you actually believe that a being capable for forming the entire universe, where even in our own solar system days aren't the same across all the planets, has the same timescale as one planet? Really?

That's also pretty bold of you to actually claim to know how long timescales are to a timeless being. Very human centric and just a bit heretical.

EvolutionIsFake -2 points ago +4 / -6

I believe the 6 days of creation by God were 24 hour days, yes.

ObamasLooseButthole 0 points ago +2 / -2

Why does it have to be 24 Earth hours though? He made everything so why couldn't it mean 1,400 Mercury hours or 10 Jupiter hours. It could even mean that a day for God is something we couldn't even begin to fathom.

I couldn't make it through your link once I got to the "young Earth" theory. The Earth is billions of years old, there is literally no denying that with any sort of facts.

S8-10 3 points ago +3 / -0

The whole "there was evening and there was morning, the first day" kinda rules out any other interpretation.

EvolutionIsFake -1 points ago +2 / -3

The Earth is billions of years old


there is literally no denying that with any sort of facts


But who am I to discuss this with a science denier that doesn't read

FormerGraveheart 0 points ago +2 / -2

Note how that worthless novelty account keeps putting that idiocy into comments just to try and make us all look like idiots for tolerating him.

VoidWanderer 1 point ago +3 / -2

The sad part is, I don't think she's actually being a troll account. I've dealt with far too many elderly people that actually believe what she's saying to the point that they make flat earthers seem reasonable by comparison. Biblical literalists are some of the most dogmatic and utterly batshit crazy people that exist and are just as dangerous as leftists.

newrandomperson 6 points ago +6 / -0

Sometimes I watch old British Pathé videos on YouTube from the 30s, 40s, 50s about other cultures. And, I would love to visit any of those places back then. Back when cultures were unique and based on geographical limitations. Now, people can travel way more, but the intrigue in those places is way lower.

dr_gonzo 5 points ago +6 / -1

I have yet to meet a leftist that understands this inherently paradoxical aspect of their argument.

That's how you know they've been brainwashed. The inability to make fairly trivial logical connections.

R-A-T-S- 4 points ago +4 / -0

Most of their views are paradoxes.

In this one yes, everything is grey. Men and Women can do everything equally because in their eyes, these are nothing more than a label that was created long time ago when Men decided they should have everything and created women to oppress people labeled as women. Back then there was no races either. Till one man snapped his fingers and said Let there be White. And thus created white privilage. And then having no other ability but the white privilage just stole everything from the minority races that make up the greatest amount of the population

kaczan3 3 points ago +3 / -0

Embrace the differences? But only if it benefits tha woman? Why don't we embrece them in a way that makes women die 10 years earlier? It seems that we have to exploit ourselves for women's benefit in traditionalism, otherwise women will exploit us themslelves in feminism. So it's lose-lose for us.

deleted 60 points ago +60 / -0
publius1788 36 points ago +36 / -0

Yep now they are just a cog in the corporate machine and they want them to have to register for the draft. Making pot roast doesn't sound to bad now does it?

Jtenten 30 points ago +30 / -0

Worse than that - they’re deceived into doing work that is ultimately unfulfilling. Ask an 80 year old with a bunch of grandkids if they’re happy. Then ask an 80 year old feminist at her graveside.

Dangerous_donald1 18 points ago +19 / -1

I’m a 55 yo woman. I had no choice but to work and I hated it. I would rather have been home with my children who are everything to me.

It was either work or starve. Fuck those feminists who paved the way for me to have no choice.

R-A-T-S- 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yeah. lot of that was from the sudden flooding of new cheap labor that the value of labor hit rock bottom.

Vino 1 point ago +2 / -1

Making pot roast isn't even hard. 2.5-3 lbs chuck roast. 1 pack dry ranch 1 pack dry Italian 1 pack dry brown gravy Cut an onion and layer the bottom of a slow cooker Mix the three packs with water making a gravy like consistency. Slow cook 6-8 hours. Thank me later

Zelenskyscockholster 13 points ago +13 / -0

I've worked with so many young women over the years and seen them grow older, "excelling" at their job but not having children. Even the married ones!

I've seen just as many mothers and fathers also move into leadership and more important roles. You can work and still be a parent, especially at certain companies who still manage to prioritize that.

These people will regret their decision to not have children.

freeamerica4ever 21 points ago +21 / -0

You can work and raise children, but you're raising them part time and other people are raising them the rest of the time. That's the hard truth.

I do agree with you that they will regret not having children.

Zelenskyscockholster 4 points ago +4 / -0

Agreed 100%

HeavenlyTrumpets 4 points ago +6 / -2

They think as they age, their life will be some exciting thrill ride, such as portrayed in so many movies..

Reality is life is lonely without family, more and more so the older a person gets. And as you age, your peers and elders die more often (obviously) than children.

And generally speaking, the more the merrier. Have babies pedes.

FliesTheFlag 3 points ago +3 / -0

Movie Idiocracy

Jl123 4 points ago +4 / -0

And now we got men that want to be woman

schiff_for_brains 4 points ago +4 / -0

Actually, I can see how feminists view this scenario above as sexist. Hear me out.

Feminist theory is shitty. While all people deserve equal rights, women are not the same as men. You can't ignore biological differences and how species evolve over time. If you think women can lift very heavy things and do horribly shitty jobs like special ops in extremely dirty conditions with extremely low hygiene levels you're just wrong.

Given feminists have subscribed to shitty ideology, they are mentally deranged and constantly fighting biological evolution.

Is a mentally deranged woman who you want raising your kids? To a rabid feminist, a man could very well be the better caregiver because they might not be burdened with mental illness.

Verrerogo 7 points ago +8 / -1

Equal, which means equally cosmically valuable, is not the same thing as interchangeable.

Equal does not mean interchangeable.

The value of these utterly different beings, men and women, is fascinating and inspires awe of their Creator.

Wondering which is "better" is like wondering if a horse is better than a pickle. A horse is better if you need a horse. A pickle is better if it's a hot day and you want something sour and crisp with lunch.

Some questions are nonsensical.

The famous one is "What is north of the North Pole?"

Every sentence with a question mark at the end isn't a valid question.

CucumberExtract 4 points ago +4 / -0

I agree, and a car analogy is good for equal not being interchangeable.

Imagine a $500 part for two different model cars. Same price for both, but the one you need is the one that matches the car you need it for.

Verrerogo 2 points ago +2 / -0


Conservativechick 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good men do not get nearly enough credit.

deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
HorribleDeplorable 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's nonsense. Plenty for a mother to do when the kids are at school, plenty for them to do during the summer to keep the kids busy also.

I feel like what you said is something that someone without kids would say.

But yes there are lazy people in the world too.

deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
memeYourDreams 4 points ago +4 / -0

Women used to have 7+ kids a few centuries ago and still is in many countries. Getting 7+ kids to adulthood is not easy.

The last 150 years was so unusual we are still creating and changing customs to try to make sense and find happiness in all this.

Most men and women are not taught to self cultivate their wisdom and intelligence to find their own fulfillment by the corrupt religious systems that we have. So many succumbs to things like shopping and TV.

Watch out, 'work' is just like shopping and TV. A substitute for spiritual wellness. Ages ago many people became monks and priests, writers, goldsmiths, artists and teachers in their later ages instead of continuing to work. The world was a better place spiritually then.

VoidWanderer 4 points ago +6 / -2

Men have lost the authority to tell women "get off your ass, make sure the house is clean and dinner is ready when I get home." You try to tell a woman that now and the "family" court will rip you apart through the duluth model lens they operate under.

That's one of the reasons feminism was unleashed. Stripping men of their authority over women is the fastest way to destroy a society that relies on men to build it and maintain it.

utfanx2 1 point ago +1 / -0
  1. Doubing labor pool halves wages.
Bigger_igloo 53 points ago +53 / -0

They only say that because they want parents to hand their kids off to the state as soon as possible. They're pushing for early child care funded by gov so they start the indoctrinating earlier.

Also, look how well it's been working. People are more fucked up than ever.

deleted 32 points ago +32 / -0
SteveRogers42 18 points ago +18 / -0

Reduced women’s respect for their husbands by taking away his unique role.

Jeffersonian_Man 10 points ago +10 / -0

I always bring this up when it comes to economics. You doubled the work force, of course wages have stagnated. Even if feminists held a "stay home" campaign, I'd support it. That's what needs to happen.

Bigger_igloo 2 points ago +2 / -0

For sure. I saw a documentary once that touched on this. It was about education system and told the story of a woman who was high up in national education system and the crazy Rockefeller Institute system they were shifting to. She saw immediately what it would cause.

She was right.

AngelMark 52 points ago +52 / -0

I loved coming home from school and having my mother there. The house always smelled clean. I would have to do my homework and then I could go outside. She cooked every night. We ate dinner together every night until I went off to college. It was glorious!

Steel-Wrought-Eagle 14 points ago +14 / -0

And this right here is what I’m doing for my kids. The little things add up over the years!

they-see-me-trollin 10 points ago +10 / -0

what are you, some racist nazi bigot!?!

swift_water -2 points ago +3 / -5

No offense to your mother, but why wasn't she the one raising you if she was home?

DeplorableDrumpftard 5 points ago +5 / -0

I guess not all mothers wanna homeschool. I’m sure it’s confusing to some, or they just feel like they aren’t “qualified” (at least that’s what the left claims, that mothers aren’t qualified teachers 🙄).

The reality is, it’s easier than one thinks. Overwhelming at first, but once you get into your groove, it’s smooth sailings.

Capitalism_Fuck_Yeah 2 points ago +3 / -1

Many teachers aren't qualified to be teachers...

onomatopoeia 3 points ago +3 / -0

Schools weren't all shit for ever history. I graduated high school in 2006. And I see that I caught the tail end of real 'education'. I was 18 when I got my first flip phone. But now everything is fucked up indeed. But now that I'm twice as old as I was, yeah I would teach young me different things than what was taught to me. I wouldn't have mastered math so much (controversial opinion: math doesn't matter) and did sports more and accounting or computers. But hey it's the past and I can't wait until this cure for death finally comes like Kanye West with his hands in the air, like you give a damn and a fuck, put em up. Put em up!. Oh yeah..

deleted 25 points ago +26 / -1
FauciOuchi 11 points ago +12 / -1

I’m working two full time right now and trying to get my third. Same thing. It’s worth it.

PhoneBandit 3 points ago +4 / -1

Damn, boy get it.

onomatopoeia 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just get a job in trucking bruh.

FauciOuchi 0 points ago +1 / -1

I need something in my profession where I can work 4 hours a week

Suture_Self 2 points ago +2 / -0

Would it be possible to get by with a side hustle instead of a third? That side hustle has the potential to grow into a full business. A third job doesn't.

FauciOuchi 0 points ago +1 / -1

Maybe, but when each job pays 150k each, why bother

Suture_Self 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well it sounds like you have an in-demand skill. I was thinking it could snowball into something huge and maybe you'll make millions. Then, you could pass it on to your kids. And you could refuse to hire anyone with pronouns in their resume.

FauciOuchi 0 points ago +1 / -1

I have a 4th already for that, No income though , but have a good team to create something. Just haven’t struck anything yet.

But jobs 1/2/3 pay for my investment in #4

Suture_Self 0 points ago +1 / -1

Who the hell are you, elon musk? I can't even get out of bed at a decent hour. I hope you achieve all your hopes and dreams. You're earning it for sure.

SunlightontheFloor 0 points ago +1 / -1

Get your nutrition, hydration, and sleep straight. I used to have that problem. I was wasn't well and didn't know it.

SteersBeersandQueers 25 points ago +25 / -0

And staying home is cheaper than day care

rossiFan 18 points ago +18 / -0

Yep. It makes no sense to work to put your kids in daycare, but yet some women do. I know women whose entire salary goes to Primrose Academy in Dallas.

they-see-me-trollin 10 points ago +10 / -0

it's fucking retarded how so many women work and spend all or more than their post-tax income to put the kids in daycare.

they've clearly never learned even basic personal finance. if you make $2k in post-tax income, you cannot spend $2k on child care.

rossiFan 8 points ago +8 / -0

That's not even what bothers me. They don't want to parent. The nuclear family is breaking down.

VoidWanderer 3 points ago +4 / -1

As intended. People think "feminism" was some organic movement of women that finally realized "blah blah blah" and all that horseshit.

It's a weapon. It's always been a weapon. It will continue to be a weapon until men as a whole put their foot down and take away the things women didn't earn and put them back into the place they evolved to be.

Verrerogo 8 points ago +8 / -0

Some (not your friends, but some) say, "I know my salary goes to daycare, and I don't earn much really, but I am keeping my hand in, just in case we divorce. I don't want to be helpless if that happens. I want a job history. That's why it is worth it to work, even though the money aspect isn't much."'


The woman may be CAUSING the very thing she fears, by being prepared for it.

The joke is on the woman, because her salary is not much better than that of a woman who never worked at all. Money does not grow on trees. It is given to the very, very few with leadership skills, and that is born in, not earned at the office or at school. No "experience" confers it.

How to ruin your life by being too careful.

Sometimes you should just trust and go with the flow. Have faith.

x79q3pb 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's awfully specific.

rossiFan 9 points ago +9 / -0

ThATs h0w U kNOw i Kn0W!

x79q3pb 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well alrighty then!

pyroclasticflow 9 points ago +9 / -0

And presumably the mother of the child cares more about that child and their well-being than a random daycare worker.

SteersBeersandQueers 3 points ago +3 / -0


DeplorableDrumpftard 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is what many don’t understand. SO much cheaper. YOU can control what they see, hear, and do. You get to teach them things about life at a much younger age than if you were to send them to daycare each day.

There was a study somewhere that I read through like 5 years ago that said that there’s no difference between sending your kids to daycare to “learn” stuff vs them staying home and doing mostly the same sort of stuff.

When those kids ended up in primary school they were both on the same-ish levels academically. But as they followed these kids into middle and high school they noticed that the kids who stayed home seemed to be more intellectually mature than those who were in daycare/being cared for by a stranger.

SteersBeersandQueers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Totally agree and I wanted to go back and edit my comment of "cheaper'"; if you have to spend the money you make from working for daycare, why bother? Just quit the job, raise your kid's (better)and go back to work once they're old enough

Harvey_Specter 14 points ago +15 / -1

My wife homeschools and it’s hard as hell. It’s beyond a full time job. She’s fucking amazing for doing it.

SunlightontheFloor 2 points ago +2 / -0

They begin to go on autopilot in the middle school range. Mine did. I was just the overseer.

Froynlavenfroynlaven -5 points ago +8 / -13

Don't misunderstand me, not saying it's not important or beneficial. But it's disingenuous to say that's actually more difficult than a job.

Harvey_Specter 7 points ago +7 / -0

It is a job. You also don’t know the size of my family. You’ve clearly never done it so you have no idea of what’s involved in the entire process.

onomatopoeia 0 points ago +1 / -1

You're also disingenuous about the size of your family. Don't worry. When all of America shuts down cuz diesel fuel is well over $15 a gallon. Everybody will be coming to people like you to take what they can get asshole.

Harvey_Specter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol. Bring it. Love to see you try.

onomatopoeia 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure. You're not as strong as you think.

Froynlavenfroynlaven -3 points ago +4 / -7

Again, never said it wasn't important, but to say it's actually harder than to put food on the table is just not true. Any woman with a higher than retard IQ can do that, while plenty of people are incapable of adequately funding a family.

SunlightontheFloor 5 points ago +5 / -0

You aren't comparing apples to apples. My husband has a physically hard job, but he doesn't do well with juggling 78 random things. I could never do what he does. He would be hard-pressed to do what I do. They are both hard in different ways.... the guy was acknowledging that.

Suckitreddit 4 points ago +4 / -0

There are jobs that are physically demanding that are “hard”. But when your shift is over, it’s over. Probably have to work with some real jerks, maybe answer to the worst jerk in the whole dept.

There are mentally demanding jobs that are “easy” on your body, but difficult mentally and then there are the challenges of clients and political considerations in the workplace. Those jobs are never really “over” at the end of the day. Emails come in throughout the day and many are catching up on actual work at night, because they’re in meetings all day.

Both of these scenarios deal w/ adults.

Now, imagine being a teacher of many different levels at once, figuring out how best to explain a concept for a particular student’s learning style, validating skills and correcting gently, being ready for each opportunity and learning window that presents itself, and managing the same office politics at work, but instead of adults who act like children, there are just children who act like children.

Oh and you also have a gig at Uber, and you are volunteering on the board and as CFO for a non-profit, and you have another side gig w instaCart and molly maids and also a side gig as a cook in a greasy spoon.

PatriotRacer 9 points ago +9 / -0

I insisted my wife stay home - she was thrilled to spend all that time with her - spent 12 years at home. Best thing for her, our kiddo and us. It was challenging at times financially- but our kiddo has 2 parents that created a stable loving home, she knows how to use, clear, load every weapon in the safe - know basic survival skills and stands up to her friends who are maki g bad life decisions. If more kids were raised like this - we wouldn’t be in the place we are

DixMcCoy 2 points ago +3 / -1

MAGA playdates? Well, the idea of "play dates" is cringy, but...

MAGA Range Dates? Hello fellow Americans? Let's put holes in paper, pew pew!

Suckitreddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Air rifles, eye protection, trigger discipline. And no varmints left.

From what I hear, Lots of MAGA Homeschool pods.

KYMAGApatriot1 8 points ago +8 / -0

When we had our twins my husband and I agreed I would stay home with our children. No way was I putting them in daycare. I wanted to shape the direction of my children’s lives - not some stranger. Furthermore, I homeschooled them through the 5th grade and they finished at a Christian academy. It literally took me only four hours to teach them each day. I also worked hard to ensure they had plenty of social interaction through church, homeschool activities with other homeschooled children, etc. They turned out to be very respectful, hard-working adults whom I’m very proud of. You absolutely cannot put a price tag on something like this.

Hodeefuk2651 7 points ago +7 / -0

I agree. Better children come out of stay at home mom

Brainz 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think ALL actual Men would agree that a woman, their wife, does an exponentially better job of nurturing their children at a very young age, feeding them, etc.

nutmeg 6 points ago +6 / -0

Most women would like to stay home with their kids, at least for a few years, and especially if their jobs are basically "jobs" and not "careers". It the loud, angry few who complain about it. It's always the loud, angry few who complain about everything and drive the narrative of everything these days.

GoldwaterVoter 5 points ago +5 / -0

I grew up in the late 40's and 50's. Graduated from high school in 1961. My mother never had to work outside of the home. We lived in modest but nice 4 BR homes, and our mom was always there when we got home from school.

Men had good jobs so women didn't have to work outside of the home. Life was great.

TommyJarvis 5 points ago +5 / -0

What is more important in the grand scheme of the universe?

  1. Raising and nurturing strong, healthy children? Or

  2. Making spreadsheets all day in a cubicle?

Why would a woman object to 1?

covok48 5 points ago +5 / -0

Glad wife stays at home. Had she been working all that income would have just gone to daycare anyway.

Scumbag-reddit 4 points ago +4 / -0

My wife is a stay at home mother for our 8-month old, and it leads to me working 12 hour days so I can make sure I can provide for our family and have enough spending money to uphold our standard of living. I leave work exhausted mentally every day and I'd not have it any other way.

PartTimeLoser 4 points ago +6 / -2

Women had it good back in the day. Stay home and take care of the house, make your husband orgasm every once in awhile and once he’s done working you take in all the benefits of his hard work and live off his retirement and life insurance.

Man, what a hard tough gig they had.

Suture_Self 2 points ago +3 / -1

Plus, a lifetime of purpose and emotional satisfaction

Hercules89 4 points ago +8 / -4

Familyhood is constantly being discouraged, it is physically destroying this nation.

OlenaLehua 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ok but hear me out, a homemaker, mother, wife, no "career". The husband must must must appreciate her and let her know it. Otherwise that's how you get "women's lib". Also do not, I repeat do not, EVER, leave her for your secretary...

hamfist 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's all based on how a couple wants their kids raised. My wife and I want our beliefs and morals taught to our kids. I don't want some idiot at daycare doing that. Not to mention the cost of daycare is expensive. We have six kids. Not happening!

Pdjco658 3 points ago +3 / -0

modern feminism was underwritten by corporations that wanted women to abandon their newborns and come back to work to continue to make the company money. Women have been somehow convinced that going to work is empowering but coincidentally benefits the company complete at the expense of her family. That's such a strange coincidence as if the companies tailor made modern feminism to maximize the benefit for corporations. How does a woman putting her career on hold by raising her family benefit the company? It doesn't and that's why that isn't what women are taught.

Justaguy147 3 points ago +3 / -0

Our children will be better for it. They in turn will seek to build the same type of family structure that allowed them to thrive. Society as a whole is strengthened and far better off. This is a role only women can play. Men must understand this comes at a cost. Your stay at home wives raising children will be exhausted, especially when they're young. They will not be in the mood as often as you would like, raising children day after day hour after hour is a different type of Labor. Hormones play a huge role and other types of stress come into play, such the constant worry that she is making the right choices for your child both short and long-term. My point is this is where men must Step Up and love your wives sacrificially.

deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
SunlightontheFloor 3 points ago +3 / -0

Stay at home mothering, homekeeping, homeschooling, and the opportunity to also attempt meaningfu/ profitable engagement in commercial enterprise makes us among the richest women in the world. It's why we aren't in sweaty crowds weeping and gnashing our teeth. It's nice to be loved and cared for, and to have the honor of reciprocating....... as well as pouring out our gifts, talents, and efforts for those we love the most in all the world.

MammasAlwaysRIGHT 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the only way! Raising your babies will pay dividends forever. The false feminist movement “empowered” you to become a career woman to take you from your home. Reject them.

Ghostof_PatrickHenry 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can hear the corporatists SEETHING as they read this.

Dangerous_donald1 2 points ago +2 / -0
  1. It is
  2. True
  3. True

I would have given anything to stay home with my children. But the feminists demanded to work and the market adjusted to a two family income. We could barely survive with two incomes with a very modest home and minimal expenses and I was the breadwinner. Thanks bitches!!

MetallicOpeth 2 points ago +2 / -0

something something gender roles are evil. fuck off commies

TooTrick 2 points ago +2 / -0

When a government entity creates a power of attorney disguised as a birth certificate that abolished sovereignty that person becomes property of that government entity. But then that government entity does not want someone teaching those children that the government entity is bad. So they tell women that they need jobs and to pay federal income taxes. The children need public school, and the Father is oppressing you.

knnbccb 2 points ago +3 / -1

It's 'sexist' because the feminazis want women to have:

  1. A career (make their own money without relying on a man).

  2. Guilt-free no strings attached hookup sex.

  3. Childfree.

If a woman wants to be a mother, it will be on her terms. Everyone must worship her 'divine womb' and/or 'sacred femininity'. The father is cast aside, because... she is strong and independent who does not need to rely on a man (other than being a sperm donor).

Feminism is rebellion against God and male authority, and a gynocentric society is fertile ground for this rebellion.

burritolivesmatter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Women need to go back to being Women and Men need to go back to being Men.

So fucking controversial.

Search Rollo Tomassi.

gimmeabreak 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's actually the very opposite of sexist. It's men recognizing their limitations and letting women know that, in this arena, we understand that they are superior to us. Only in Clown World can a man announce that he is inferior to women and still be called a sexist.

EagleOverTriumph 1 point ago +1 / -0

and let me guess, the first reply to it is repeating all of that and changing None to All?

Conservativechick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Personally, I like being on a pedestal. I'll take it an give respect and honor in return.

Zelenskyscockholster 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's also true

kaczan3 1 point ago +2 / -1

When times are good, women are like: "I'm a strong independent woman" When times are dad: "Please take care of me daddy"

Trump2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did I just agree with everything a libtard wrote?

SunlightontheFloor 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, they last line was them being sarastic. lol

Trump2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

I stand by my assessment. I don't believe it's sexist as I don't find women inferior. I believe it's the way God wanted us to live in harmony. I can't imagine any woman I'd consider marrying to find this sexist either.

Fuckommies 1 point ago +1 / -0


Saltyminer11 1 point ago +1 / -0

Those statements are not sexist. They are fact.

ArtLife 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not only is it not sexist- it is loving and Christian.

JesusWept 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not only is it not sexist, this is true.

patrioticwinning3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now that's wife material :D

MikeObamasVeineyCock 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is sexist. It is also the truth.

Froynlavenfroynlaven 4 points ago +4 / -0

The truth often is racist, sexist, et cetera.

xBigCoffinHunter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nor is it if it goes the other way around. In the name of equality of course.

corntortilla 1 point ago +1 / -0

If anything, #2 is sexist against men. Men can raise young children just as well as a woman.

IamBACK 0 points ago +1 / -1

Women cannot be employed and be good mothers to young children simultaneously.

Mind you, selfishness/feminism is what drives most women to get their career going before trying to have a baby when they are in their 40s and then have despair, so they adopt Chinese or Black kids...from China or Africa.

Wanderlust 0 points ago +1 / -1

If anything you could make a weak case that it's sexist against men.

drsowells1fan 0 points ago +1 / -1

As latchkey child of working parents I remember seeing the feminist propaganda The Stepford Wives (original) as a kid and thinking "You wouldn't have to replace me with a robot...their life looks idyllic ...where do I sign up?"

HeavenlyTrumpets 0 points ago +1 / -1

All of those three things are true of nearly every mother too.

AngryAsian -1 points ago +1 / -2

How about, their boss tells them to do something, they do it. If they won't afford that same treatment to their man YOU should kick them to the curb

Voteordie -3 points ago +1 / -4

No one thinks it’s sexists to want them to do it, it’s sexist to expect them to do it