2131
Comments (155)
sorted by:
110
Moheekin 110 points ago +110 / -0

And that third party is MAGA

73
Ophelia 73 points ago +73 / -0

America First Party.

“ You’re either with us or you’re against us.”

20
ripley88 20 points ago +20 / -0

Normally I would say that's an extreme position... but it do be like that. It's the leftist extremists that have put everyone in the corner.

11
Ophelia 11 points ago +11 / -0

You're either FOR America or you're not. If you're not, you're an enemy of America. Basically just that.

10
Midgeba 10 points ago +10 / -0

Revoke citizenships. Execute criminals. Deport aliens.

America First.

4
Hunter77 4 points ago +4 / -0

Good luck executing/deporting about 100 million people, though. Even if their numbers aren't as big as claimed, they're still awfully big.

3
Midgeba 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's smart people around. There's got to be a way to figure it out.

Split everybody in two camps. If you don't belong here, get the fuck out. We can either motivate them the hard way or the easy way. Honestly, I'm ok with either. GET THE FUCK OUT OF OUR COUNTRY.

If they don't want to get out, stack the bodies. Works for me.

3
Hunter77 3 points ago +3 / -0

Doubt it'll happen. There are too many people who are 'peaceful patriots' who don't want violence. You'll end up with a civil war among MAGA folk if it comes to that.

1
bicentennial_john 1 point ago +1 / -0

maybe wirh the help of 33,000 smart gullotines and mass graves that can fit 5 to 10 bodies each in every state deployed since 2015ish?

2
Ophelia 2 points ago +2 / -0

Form your mouth to God’s ears.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
32
MoreTorbaLessKushner 32 points ago +34 / -2

The Patriot Party.

2
justfedup 2 points ago +2 / -0

The American Conservative Party, ACP

2
vegaspatriot1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

45 ACP?

1
swifty123456 1 point ago +1 / -0

andre yang disagrees he has a 3rd party now

22
p1smo 22 points ago +23 / -1

The lion is our mascot.

4
1777 4 points ago +5 / -1

Lions sleep the day away, and it’s taken by Lying Ted Cruz

7
p1smo 7 points ago +8 / -1

What else are they supposed to do in the African Sahara during the heat of the day? Get a 9-5 job?

it’s taken by Lying Ted Cruz

No it isn't. The lion is king of the jungle, a leader of men, which is why Trump uses the imagery so much, as he should.

-2
1777 -2 points ago +1 / -3

The Lion Trump has been trying hard to stick, but it doesn’t resound. Sorry….Lying Ted Cruz beat ya to it.

3
p1smo 3 points ago +4 / -1

What the hell are you talking about? We're not talking about nicknames or calling him "Lion Trump"... we're talking about party mascots ie. donkeys, elephants and lions, which are symbols of strength, leadership and peace within the Christian religion.

0
1777 0 points ago +1 / -1

“What the hell” then close with “Christian religion”…nice.

3
p1smo 3 points ago +4 / -1

We aren't in disagreement, you're just misunderstanding the conversation. The whole point of this thread is about a 3rd political party. Parties have mascots ie. donkeys/elephants, which is why the Patriot/MAGA/America First Party... whatever people want to call it should adopt a lion as theirs, because:

  • lions are the king of beasts

  • Jesus was called the "Lion of Judah"

  • lions symbolize strength, leadership and peace, they are righteous

Nobody is trying to call Trump, "Lion Trump", I've literally never heard that. He just uses the symbol for his campaign, most likely for the reasons above, and some dopey nickname people gave Ted Cruz doesn't override thousands of years of Christian symbolism. If you think otherwise, then we are in disagreement.

I read your past history comments and I absolutely agree with you on all of your comments

If that's how you feel, then quit downvoting me. This isn't Reddit.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
new_meta 2 points ago +2 / -0

EAGLE

2
MarchHare762 2 points ago +2 / -0

Eagles are trash. The bald eagle has great PR, people think it's some kind of noble, majestic alpha predator. Bullshit. I can't tell you how many times I've seen bald eagles eating roadkilled deer or bags of garbage.

Fuck eagles.

2
zzyzyx 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've seen bald eagles shred ducks. They are opportunists and will eat carrion as well as fresh kills.

Many think the wild turkey should have been the national bird.

0
Heavy_Metal_Patriot 0 points ago +1 / -1

Honey badger!!

1
new_meta 1 point ago +1 / -0

i eat roadkill deer too. but i wont eat bugs, and neither do eagles

1
MarchHare762 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you eat them when they bloated and rotting?

1
new_meta 1 point ago +1 / -0

nah

17
UpTrump 17 points ago +17 / -0

If we do that, we need to make sure Trump recruits true MAGA candidates to run. No more of this RINO bullshit

4
CookieMonsters 4 points ago +4 / -0

No more Pence no more Burr

6
logan34 6 points ago +6 / -0

LMAO I wish my guy but I'm certain this poll the half the people who want a third party want literal Socialists. Like in their minds its not commie enough. We need more taxes and more free gibs from the government.

20
NullifyAndSecede 20 points ago +23 / -3

Libertarian party was recently taken over by Ron Paul libertarians, it's worth a look.

https://twitter.com/lpnational

20
TheAttackTitan 20 points ago +21 / -1

It’s a coalition of Ron Paul Libertarians and MAGA people. It’s fucking beautiful.

LP is the most viable it’s ever been

14
Azill 14 points ago +15 / -1

This. If the momentum keeps up it might be a better home for MAGA than the republican fuckfest we currently have. At least we won't have to deal with rinos.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
12
grandfather_nurgle 12 points ago +12 / -0

No shit? During 2020 they embraced globohomo with the rest of the bugmen.

6
RootinTootin 6 points ago +6 / -0

It was only this year that the LP party had their internal elections and the power change took place

4
Husky 4 points ago +4 / -0

Completely ignorant to the situation but that sounds sus.

1
RootinTootin 1 point ago +1 / -0

iykyk, no cap

1
AmericanJawa 1 point ago +1 / -0

iykyk, no cap

Can you put it in layman's terms?

1
AmericanJawa 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the Libertarian Party can be taken over from the inside, why not the Republicans too?

1
JackLemon 1 point ago +2 / -1

Libtardarians are almost as clueless as Libtards. They have no clue about reality and think Ayn Rand's world could function. smh.

20
raptoris 20 points ago +20 / -0

Uniparty has locked in its hold over the electoral process. I dont see a way for a 3rd party to be successful in the current environment.

15
ThomasJ 15 points ago +15 / -0

A 3rd party will easily just be subverted and infiltrated by this regime. If it can do so for both parties it can easily do it again

4
RabidZoo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Or lawfare'd into oblivion.

1
jarvis 1 point ago +1 / -0

A third party will be used to split the conservative vote and ensure Democrat rule...

Unless we beat them to the punch and meme a third progressive party into existence

0
Skepticuck 0 points ago +4 / -4

A third party will take time to develop critical mass. But if you do not start it, it will never happen. So either get on board or continue to come here and whine about muh RINOs and muh communists. Get off your ass and be a part of the change you want to see.

2
ThomasJ 2 points ago +4 / -2

It seems like you weren’t able to understand the point at all

2
JackLemon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Three won't work, we will need at least four that hold seats in Congress.

2
anotherthing 2 points ago +2 / -0

This right here. If there is a third party, it needs to be a left wing party so it splits their vote, not ours.

For those clamoring for a MAGA party, look at it this way. Say you have "purple states" which are 55% republican and 45% democrat. Now introduce another right wing party in there. The Democrats will keep their 45%, but the 55% that was Republican would be 40% Republican and 15% MAGA. A lot of conservative boomers and Gen X still remember that Ross Perot split the vote on conservatives and put Bill Clinton in the White House. If you toss Perot's voters in with the people that voted for Bush Sr, Bush Sr. gets re-elected. Instead, we got Clinton who weaponized the IRS and ATF as well as stacking other agencies, sold us out to China and the whole Chinagate shit, obliterated militias across the country, and so on. Clinton put us on the road to where we are right now.

17
barwhack 17 points ago +17 / -0

"Third". I'd settle for a second.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
8
Ebbie8708 8 points ago +8 / -0

So the other 33% must be benefiting from the economic and policy chaos lol

8
whitman_99 8 points ago +8 / -0

As a Canadian, do not split, your fucked then. We have like 5 parties and then 2 more started, I voted for one of those new parties, that said everything I wanted to hear, but then we didn't win a single seat. Take the Republican party back, kick out the RINOs.

3
GaryWA 3 points ago +3 / -0

I spent the night with girl once in Vancouver BC on election night, flipped on the TV. Holy Hannah, ya'll have a LOT of Parties. It was fascinating to watch, the girl got pissed I was glued to the TV...hahahahaha

6
TravelingSalesman 6 points ago +6 / -0

Just get rid of the two parties we currently have and start over.

6
Seenev 6 points ago +6 / -0

We need a third party where one of the primary principles is no more omnibus bills and pork riders. Single issue votes only, otherwise it's an automatic no vote.

5
cantrememberpassword 5 points ago +5 / -0

Andrew Yang said he's starting a new "centrist party," that consists of 100% ex GOP. Nothing says centrist like only GOP + Andrew Yang.

They have no policies yet, but I assume a centrist party would be "pro choice + pro god."

9
MAGASQUAD 9 points ago +9 / -0

Andrew Yang has a high risk of contracting monkeypox

4
Recyclops 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yang's "Forward" is just a stealth rebranding and expansion of the Lincoln Project. It will be packed with never-Trumpers. Miles Taylor, the anonymous NYT op-ed writer that trashed Trump in 2018, is already on the team.

4
AmericanGuy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Third parties never work. Take BACK ours.

3
ScienceDenier 3 points ago +3 / -0

People are stupid. There are 2 political parties, because there are those who attack the constitution, and there are those who defend it. The names are irrelevant. If the parties disappeared tomorrow, nothing would change. The founders put forth a document that outlines government in the most logical and ethical way possible. You either understand that or you don't. That isn't to say, those who attack the constitution don't understand it. Some are evil, some are ignorant. The fact is, none of that changes by starting a new political party. The way I look at it, there are those besieging the castle where the constitution is kept, and there are those defending. Forming companies and platoons within that defense makes sense, but the names make not difference. You're defending or attacking. That's it.

1
swifty123456 1 point ago +1 / -0

i see it different there should always be 2 parties

1 saying the government should do x the other saying nope x is none of governments business

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
ceremony_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

We don't need a third political party.

Political parties are one of the key reasons we are where we are.

Remember the advice of the Founding Fathers, and George Washington in particular regarding political parties?

You see, there is no reason to be in a political party if you are there to represent your constituents. The only time you need to be part of a party is if your views may be antithetical to your constituents, and you need extra support in the form of money.

Political parties are exactly like corporations, only that the product being sold is politicians.

Donors = Shareholders Party National Committee = Board of Directors Party Leadership = Executive Officers Party Politicians = The Products Voters = The Consumers

You see how this works?

3
KilluminatiAJ 3 points ago +3 / -0

AMERICA FIRST PARTY.

2
Gunmolester 2 points ago +2 / -0

no we just need one party...The MAGA party

2
16BeatsAOne 2 points ago +2 / -0

Andrew Yang and Christine Whitman are currently trying to form a Third Party. Of course, that attempt will fall flat. But we'll have to hear their "Rah, Rah BS" for yhe next three months or so while they try to become Prom King and Prom Queen of their Forward Party.

2
TehAgent 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuckin Yang I forgot all about UBI Guy.

2
16BeatsAOne 2 points ago +2 / -0

The rest of the country has too. About every six months, Yang attempts to stay relevant -- and he remains an obscurity.

Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

2
DisbandTheCIA 2 points ago +4 / -2

Lion party

Constitutionalists

Liberty is delivered from the barrel of a gun.

Family, God and country, peace through strength, a world of sovereign nations and self determination, hard work makes happy people.

I want to see a party name that pays respect to the concept of local governance at the county and community levels. People need to better engage in their local politics so that it impacts the broader (not higher) levels of government.

2
GaryWA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just occurred to me. Andrew Yang just started one called the Forward Party. Someone needs to clue him in, the word "Forward" is a Communist Slogan going back to Lenin days. Anyone ever heard of The Great Leap Forward in China? Someone should send him a tweet and let him know. Amazing what can learn paying attention in History class.

1
Recyclops 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Forward is also a new york publication that started as a "Yiddish-language daily socialist newspaper" in 1897.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
utfanx2 2 points ago +5 / -3

Green and Libertarian parties should form a coalition focused centrally on liberty. Sharing half power is better than no power.

9
IAmARealAmurican 9 points ago +9 / -0

Green party is authoritarian in nature...

2
utfanx2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why are both left wing parties authoritarian? Nobody cares about the hippy vote?

What could be greener than a limited government? Trim the fat.

4
jimzumaca 4 points ago +4 / -0

If that was the sole point of a Green Party, I’d agree. But they have a lot of absolute control concepts. Disappointing.

3
zzyzyx 3 points ago +3 / -0

I refer to them as watermelons. Green on the outside and red (commie) on the inside.

3
Dictator_Bob 3 points ago +4 / -1

The modern democrats are made up of the fringes of the green party. So-called "progressives" would have been ideal. Except Clinton's party choked them out.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Patriotedd 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actually, we need a 2nd political party.

2
Liberals_R_Idiots 2 points ago +2 / -0

66% of Americans are White Supremacists and bigots!

2
Yawnz13 2 points ago +2 / -0

Third parties only ever serve to split the vote.

2
DZP1 2 points ago +2 / -0

We desperately need an alternative to the Uniparty.

In these times of biblical levels of betrayal, we must start afresh, and toss out the traitors. The false president, Congress, top ranks of the FBI, DOJ, tranny admirals - wash it all away. We need an American revolution to remove the criminals.

2
Ryanaissance 2 points ago +2 / -0

When the majority want a uniparty, the three letters will grow one.

2
JBlaze056 2 points ago +2 / -0

Another corrupt party to fester in the swamp

2
Cheske 2 points ago +2 / -0

At this point, I unironically want to see what an American Fascist Party could offer an average citizen.

2
doomerglowie 2 points ago +2 / -0

"But a third party would let the democrats win!!! reeee!" - every. win reply to every time third party is brought up

3
Froynlavenfroynlaven 3 points ago +3 / -0

And they're not wrong unfortunately

3
jimzumaca 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sadly lefties vote in lockstep no matter what idiot is running. See all the people with D after their name that got elected.

2
grandfather_nurgle 2 points ago +3 / -1

We don’t need a third political party. We just need to get rid of the two we have and let the country be run by a small group of white Christian nationalists.

1
Spokane20 1 point ago +1 / -0

What about the founders? They were white nationalists whom governed in a secular manner.

2
zeporscheguy 2 points ago +2 / -0

The GOP and dems are colluding to destroy the country. They’re all grifters robbing us blind.

2
Tom_Brett 2 points ago +2 / -0

We should create a wedge between Squad and Bernie people.

Vote for AOC in the primaries if we have to.

Then have their vote split in the General.

Dominate them. 50/25/25 in the congressional alignment

obviously take presidency

4
jimzumaca 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sounds like Limbaugh with Operation Chaos.

1
Whitespace 1 point ago +1 / -0

Another political party would be just dross if there isn't a movement to clean out the permanent Washington class.

1
Americafuqyeah 1 point ago +1 / -0

America First! MAGA!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
MAGAPlenty 1 point ago +1 / -0

The best time to start a third party is when the Right holds a HUGE majority in both chambers of Congress and the other branches of government. Room for drastic change

1
Raziel68 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just remember:. Third party led to Ross Perot. Ross Perot 3way split led to Bill Clinton. No Bill means no Hilary. Be careful what you wish for!

1
JackLemon 1 point ago +1 / -0

We need at least four parties to save the US. Nothing needs to be said about the DemonRats, but their proven beyond-all-doubt traitorous colleagues in the Republican party must be abandoned as well.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Dialectic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Patriot party or MAGA party

1
USPatriot45 1 point ago +1 / -0

66 percent in honest terms means 99.9

1
Siteless_Vagrant 1 point ago +1 / -0

We jave like 50 political parties. None of them are popular enough to dethrone the big two.

1
Dindu_nuffins2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck, I want to reset the whole fucking government. Trim down on all the damn bureaucrats and alphabet agencies. I want to clean house! Fuck a third party. Let's start by hanging the traitors in the two existing party and see where we are at that point.

1
KGB82 1 point ago +1 / -0

I want a Constitutional Communist and Weirdo Slayer party. All purveyors of liberalism fined, then jailed, too. What's the definition of this "liberalism"?. . . you know it when you see it. But to be sure, commitees of 11, 20-year veterans of marriage, with no record of being a weirdo or a commie, will be formed for each state to deliberate on the new weirdo and commie laws. All children of commie or weirdos who are indicted and jailed will be placed in the custody of Carl's Jr.

1
Goozmania 1 point ago +1 / -0

When we get a third party, it will be a socialist party.

1
USAisAOKay 1 point ago +1 / -0

For the record: I called for a third party 6 years ago when the RINO’s first betrayed Trump. Everyone said, I was cra cra. All the MAGA politicians would of left the Republican Party, No backstabbing, RINO’s would have no funding…

1
Wrexxis780 1 point ago +1 / -0

I want one political party. Americans and no others

1
FrankWisner 1 point ago +1 / -0

With only less Jesus, you may watch Lucifer grow a third arm to steal more from you, and another mouth, with which to lie more proudly than haughty now.

1
mnguy12000 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is how revolutions start.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
NoComment 1 point ago +1 / -0

Perfect, MAGA Party