2335
Comments (174)
sorted by:
194
DrBJTester 194 points ago +194 / -0

All taxation is theft.

The lottery is a tax and the jackpot is also taxed it's another proof that the corrupt ruling class never wants us to win anything ever.

122
Tejanopede 122 points ago +122 / -0

Every dollar of that money that he spends will be taxed as well.

60
deleted 60 points ago +60 / -0
29
ProphetOfKek 29 points ago +29 / -0

And hope that person doesn’t fuck you over by embezzling.

18
deleted 18 points ago +20 / -2
15
AdrenochromeIsWeird 15 points ago +15 / -0

work with multiple people and have third party accountants on top your shit with bi weekly or monthly reviews/summaries. Then have someone annually verify them.

Physically hold statements and then call institutions to verify accounts, etc.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
8
SquiggyMcPepe 8 points ago +8 / -0

If I won 433 million I would stick it in a bank that handles sums of money like that and never worry about money again. I wouldn't even need any interest. That would be fairly simple to manage since they can't tax your principle only the money you make off it. It's when you want to do something with that money that the problems arise. I'm far too lazy to ever care about shit like that. Buy a nice home and a couple of nice vehicles and after that its basically food and internet and power that would be an ongoing cost and that ain't shit to me even now.

2
BecauseYoudBeInJail 2 points ago +2 / -0

Rational fear. Keep the big fish fat and happy so the little fish think it's safe for them too.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
BecauseYoudBeInJail 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ken Griffin begs to differ

4
ModernDayMao 4 points ago +4 / -0

Whoever won that should go to the biggest law firm in the country to have them claim it anonymously in a trust you bring a third party lawyer with you to the big firm to make sure they don’t fuck you. But a multi billion dollar firm probably won’t fuck you out of a couple 100M.

Same goes for whoever’s managing it don’t let your brother in law do it because he’s an accountant. Find people who already manage billions and hire a third party to double check their work.

7
Friendly_B 7 points ago +7 / -0

Loophole is just another word for exemption.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
NomadicKrow2 3 points ago +3 / -0

What elites? I know some aristocracy. I know some people who think they're better than us but if politics wasn't a profession, they'd be sweeping floors at fucking wal-mart or greeting people when they walked in the door.

2
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 2 points ago +2 / -0

JonesTaxRelief.com

17
nomoreprinkles 17 points ago +19 / -2

If he buys a house it'll be taxed every year until the bank owns the house again.

6
MawaDeBlanco1 6 points ago +6 / -0

banks don't own houses they lend money to people. taxes are paid to the state, if you don't pay after a while, it will be auctioned off and someone else will buy it.

If you default on a loan, then the bank will own it, but they don't want to own property as it causes them to lose money, so they will immediately sell it to someone like me...

This is the kind of thing that should be taught in school.

6
thisguy883 6 points ago +6 / -0

Many foreclosed homes are in the future after this recession.

Gotta keep an eye out in nice neighborhoods for those foreclosed signs and jump on it.

9
BillionsAndBillions 9 points ago +9 / -0

And every thing he buys with that money will be taxed. He'll never own any of it. When he dies, it all gets taxed again.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
24
None_OfYour_BeezeWax 24 points ago +24 / -0

The people who bought the tickets used money that they paid income tax on first on income earned from a company that paid tax on profits made from taxed goods.

He is taxed when he gets the money, and any income he earns in that year will also be in the higher bracket. Then he will spend the money on goods that are taxed and any profit made by the company after paying salaries which are taxed will be taxed again.

This is why people can never off the treadmill and why property prices have been skyrocketing and why governments are looking for ways to tax unrealized capital gains.

https://taxfoundation.org/biden-billionaire-tax-unrealized-capital-gains/

And this is from a government that can print fiat currency at will.

In fact, if you think about it, the only function tax plays in a fiat world is to soak up malinvested government largesse, thereby reducing inflation. In that sense, taxation isn't theft, directly, it is what is required to offset the theft that has already occurred in the form of corruption.

8
Friendly_B 8 points ago +8 / -0

This comment should be it's own thread.

5
Burn-them-all 5 points ago +5 / -0

take it a step further and the only real function of tax is to make you the collateral for the fiat. we are serfs to them

2
thisguy883 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the guy is smart, he wont quit his day job, at least not yet. He wont be put into a different tax bracket unless he is legit earning more than he was making the previous year.

He was already taxed for the billion he won, and cant be taxed again unless he makes investments with that money.

So if he just held it in a bank and let it sit rather than use it to invest in stocks or property, he shouldn't have to pay anything and would still get a return on taxes that he paid in 2022.

This is why super rich people don't own homes and give themselves a salary. If you look at Bezos for example, he pays himself 80k a year I believe just to avoid paying crazy taxes. Amazon owns all of his properties and luxury items and he uses it as a tax write off because its a "business expense". So even though Bezos is the richest man on earth, its not really "his money", but more or less Amazon's money.

Amazon however, pays a SHIT LOAD of taxes each year.

1
None_OfYour_BeezeWax 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most of your comment makes sense, and this might be a jurisdictional thing, but at least where I am you this would be lumped into earnings.

It doesn't really matter whether you count your normal earnings first or last, either way the lump sum would be your "base salary" for the year and then anything you earn on top of that would be in higher bracket.

It's not so much a case of being taxed again as it is a case of bumping everything else up. But he would be taxed again in the form of sales tax if he wants to do anything with the money.

The smart move is what you describe: Start a company and try to push expenses on to it (though you have to be careful). In fact, I believe a lot of the tax code is deliberately designed to funnel people into that direction, so it would be silly not to.

If you work minimum wage at Dairy Queen, you should invoice them for personal services rendered by your company on whose behalf you are working. Then you draw as much salary as you need from your company and invest the rest into your company while trying to have it run at just about break even. Something like that. This isn't financial advice, lol.

4
Donaldsweiner 4 points ago +4 / -0

What?? How did you not think about that lol. Look up Grant Cardone

3
aoneleggedduck 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jim Breuer's kids have entered the chat

2
Redneckathon 2 points ago +2 / -0

KEK. Deadass exactly what I thought.

1
thisguy883 1 point ago +1 / -0

These people who win the lottery usually lose all their money in a couple of years anyway.

16
PlatinumFMorgan 16 points ago +16 / -0

Remember when they used to anounce who the winners were?

Why don't they do that anymore?

56
magnokor 56 points ago +56 / -0

Why don't they do that anymore?

Diversity.

The winner and their family would be kidnapped within ten minutes of the name getting out.

48
deleted 48 points ago +48 / -0
31
CynicalTwit22 31 points ago +31 / -0

Some states allow anonymity. Some don't.

27
Boruzu 27 points ago +27 / -0

I remember there was actually a very protracted lawsuit somewhere on it. I would damn sure wanna stay anonymous, think about the target on your back.

5
thisguy883 5 points ago +5 / -0

Family you've never met will all of sudden show up asking for hand outs.

Or in some cases, you will be robbed or your children will be kidnapped for ransom money.

I didnt say these people were smart.

14
Brellin 14 points ago +14 / -0

Depends on the state, some of them you're required to accept the reward publicly, some of them you can stay anonymous. I remember there was one lottery winner that showed up to accept their award with a paper bag over their head with holes cut out for their eyes, because nothing said they had to show their face. Anyway with that amount of cash you've got like maybe a day or two tops to find personal security or to get the hell out of dodge of wherever you are normally at before the vultures start circling, potentially up to and including criminal kidnappers that take you and your family hostage until you fork over the account numbers the cash is in.

5
MrQuacker2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

For that kind of money you can be damn sure long lost relatives would be coming to "help" with whatever you need, there just may be an unfortunate accident

15
Brellin 15 points ago +15 / -0

I have heard it said by a number of people that the lottery is literally just a way to tax welfare queens and other poor people that are in the lowest tax brackets.

20
WhatWouldMountainDew 20 points ago +21 / -1

The lottery is just a tax for people who are bad at math.

20
SHALL_NOT 20 points ago +20 / -0

Odds of winning are about 1 in 300M

There are about 300M households in the entire American continent

So imagine I told you that I hid $1B under a bed somewhere in north/South America and for $2 I’d give you a chance to guess the address.

7
ClanWolf 7 points ago +7 / -0

Thats a cool way of looking at it, thanks.

4
BigDickTurner 4 points ago +4 / -0

The odds are low, but the consequence of winning is high. Risk can be caculated as odds * consequence, which puts participation in a different light.

3
SHALL_NOT 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well at 1:300M, it only makes mathematical sense to play if your take home would be over $600M.

That said, I still buy tickets sometimes but I just think of it as $2 to spend a week daydreaming about winning the jackpot and all the things I would do. You can dream for free but it hits different when you actually have a chance at winning, albeit a minuscule one.

6
WassermanSchultz 6 points ago +7 / -1

I get it, but I start buying tickets when it gets over 500 mil.

2
StMike 2 points ago +3 / -1

ticket - all you need is 1... pool with 7 friends for a 50 ¢ buy-in

2
fazaman 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is why everyone who actually pays taxes (net positive at the end of the year) should get one entry into every lottery drawing.

Why should people who buy lottery tickets with my tax dollars have a chance of winning, but I don't?

2
Froynlavenfroynlaven 2 points ago +2 / -0

Entertainment has value, plenty of people are perfectly good at math but think it is fun to play the lotto.

1
ProphetOfKek 1 point ago +2 / -1

A regressive tax on the stupid.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
120
CynicalTwit22 120 points ago +120 / -0

The Babylon Bee, if they haven't already, should declare Vlodomir Zelensky the winner of the jackpot as all the tax dollars will be going to him.

22
Mungo 22 points ago +22 / -0

Brilliant

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
3
thisguy883 3 points ago +3 / -0

Holy shit lol.

64
ProSemper 64 points ago +64 / -0

The actual winner is Ukraine

56
CrazyPope 56 points ago +56 / -0

As a Canadian I've never understood why this a thing in the states, even in faggy Canada the government doesn't steal the majority of your winnings

29
lefty295 29 points ago +29 / -0

There’s more money to be made. Our gambling industry is way bigger, people come from all over the world to gamble in Vegas for example. American politicians like to raise taxes without appearing to do so as well. You guys in Canada will just raise income tax or whatever, here they’ll institute gambling tax, alcohol tax, nicotine tax, etc and then claim they’re not raising your taxes because it’s only on vices. Stuff like that. Personally I actually think the US does it a little better. It’s easier to EARN money here with lower income taxes, capital gains. I hate taxes, don’t get me wrong, but I’d actually take an easier time earning money and producing something over not getting taxed on windfalls like gambling. Maybe that’s just me. Low taxes and no gambling tax would be ideal.

20
CmonPeopleGetReal 20 points ago +20 / -0

Live in Vegas, faggy liberal californians moved here and we used to have super low taxes, Now it's fucked like CA.

When they implement state income tax i'm fucking out.

5
Lelleck 5 points ago +5 / -0

No taxes […] would be ideal.

Feudalism took 10 percent, back in the day.

The agreement was, that if you work some time of the day for your lord, you got his promise, that he would defend you, and you were allowed to inherit that farmland to your sons.

Nowadays, adding all taxes that you can’t avoid, you pay at the very least 60-70 percent. Work til you are 65-70 and all your land will be taxed forever.

2
thisguy883 2 points ago +2 / -0

DC use to make it's tax money on Alcohol.

Conservatives actually allowed the income tax because they wanted to install prohibition, but that would have been a major hit on DC's revenue. So the agreement was, you get prohibition if we can get another form of taxes.

Then the wars started and income taxes became an easy sell because "You need to do your part to support the war effort".

Should have gone away after WW2 ended, but why bother? DC was loving all the new revenue coming in.

3
Schwungle 3 points ago +3 / -0

The 1.28b advertised is if you accept monthly payments for 30 years. Lump sum is more like 768m. Federal and state government income tax total about 44% on a huge lottery win like that.

1
Canlog96 1 point ago +1 / -0

The money is a lot less(maximum 70 million), but at least you can say it’s all yours.

45
sumnayin2 45 points ago +45 / -0

You win more if you win in a state like Florida. Illinois is a shitty state

9
AmericaAllDay 9 points ago +9 / -0

They have vaccine mandates to attend college, so the leftists in Illinois are keeping black people dumb and uneducated.

22
B4size25paper 22 points ago +22 / -0

With the way everything is going to shit right now, and how fucking high inflation is, I would keep those millions to fill up my tank to go to work.

24
Tejanopede 24 points ago +24 / -0

That lucky motherfucker’s got bread money til October!

3
trump4045 3 points ago +4 / -1

Or but assets that appreciate with Inflation

2
thisguy883 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd buy property and precious metals.

Since I don't pay property taxes here in Texas (disabled vet), I would buy a large plot of land and build a home.

Then I'd just sit on it until it came time to either pass the land to my children or sell it for millions when it eventually becomes a place of interest for home developers.

17
dixond 17 points ago +18 / -1

Seriously, the IRS takes like 2/3 of it? Fuck that.

20
noobcontrol 20 points ago +20 / -0

They don't. It's wrongly calculation on the annuity and not the lump sum.

6
20KAG20 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yea, it’s about 50-60% depending on what state the person lives in.

2
Froynlavenfroynlaven 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also not all goes to the IRS some goes to the state as well.

16
10MeV 16 points ago +16 / -0

It's far worse. Most (all?) of these state lotteries only promise to pay out half of the receipts. They're so popular with states because they get HALF of the money up front. Then, what they do pay out is taxed AGAIN, and it's a big amount so it's taxed at the maximum rate, state and federal. And what you buy with the leftovers? Yep, also taxed, again, and again. Taxes everywhere, every level.

The government ends up keeping probably 80% or better of the ticket sales. It's stupid profitable for the government. Lotteries are a tax on people bad at math.

4
Brellin 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, they're literally designed to tax welfare queens and the like, and other such people in the lower tax brackets that usually don't actually pay taxes.

14
MondayCoupleIsDead 14 points ago +14 / -0

So when is Biden going to give the $846M to Ukraine?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
7
elcomedian 7 points ago +7 / -0

Who? You mean Jon Lebowitz?

8
CynicalTwit22 8 points ago +16 / -8

Lump sum payments don't get the whole amount. They get maybe 75% before taxes. I'd take the annuity. I'd rather bank on a fat check for the next 20 years.

55
PresElectKekPede 55 points ago +56 / -1

You can’t leave that money to anyone. If you die, the payments stop. The smartest thing to do is take the lump sum.

22
KAGMAN 22 points ago +23 / -1

Set up a trust. Claim winnings in the name of the trust. Winnings live on as long as the trust does.

11
Poldiel 11 points ago +13 / -2

As long as you have any decent long-term plan, then either choice will serve a lottery winner just fine.

Annuity will be best for most lottery players, simply because of the psychology of having a lot of money all at once versus gaining a significantly padded income.

Also, you can leave the money. Lottery annuities are difficult to transfer, except when you die. Then it transfers to a (single!) beneficiary or your estate. The big worry is that some states will tax the money again.

12
PresElectKekPede 12 points ago +12 / -0

I stand corrected! Some lotteries only allow a transfer if the winner dies, others would require a civil court petition when the winner is still alive. I still think lump sum is the best, since you can invest and/or live off the interest immediately. With just $2 million in the bank, you make $200 per day in interest. More than enough to live comfortably.

6
TacoBot 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's not true

4
PresElectKekPede 4 points ago +5 / -1

Yep, I was wrong. I remember hearing that a long time ago so maybe the law changed since then or I was misinformed.

1
Wolfebane84 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or it changes based on the state that the winner was in at the time.

17
abstr4ct 17 points ago +17 / -0

problem is you might die. so get money now. Invest it, and never touch it. live on income.

5
abstr4ct 5 points ago +5 / -0

Next put it in a trust that pays you. and then your family when you die. Your family will never touch the money and always live well.

4
Cantshadowbanthemall 4 points ago +4 / -0

Especially if you are leveraging tax exempt bonds

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
abstr4ct 4 points ago +4 / -0

won't. but it allows you to lock up the money and start earning income right away.

Although. given that we are in a recession for foreseeable future, perhaps checks are a better option than market return, which is normally a better option.

7
p1smo 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'd rather have the money now so I can invest now. The heavy taxes sucks, but the silver lining is that it's money you didn't work for, it's just a windfall. Having the government take a fat bite out your ass when it's something you put your blood, sweat and tears into is more personal.

6
lefty295 6 points ago +6 / -0

I agree so much, there’s something much more soul crushing about working your ass off and then seeing how much the government stole.

6
Cantshadowbanthemall 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm not going to DV someone with the wherewithal and introspection to say they are a bad investor and would rather leave it to the annuity.

Takes courage to say that.

You can make more taking the lump sum but if you don't trust yourself with all that blow and hookers, take the annuity

6
Gwoz8881 6 points ago +6 / -0

It’s usually always better to take the lump sum. You can make much more investing it in an index fund and still live a very lavish lifestyle

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
7thCavBluntman 3 points ago +3 / -0

2 biggest grifters Maryland followed by New York

3
Bullgod 3 points ago +3 / -0

Amazingly Montana is close to them with a 6.9% tax

2
7thCavBluntman 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was a bit shocked by that tbh.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
jctbg20 1 point ago +5 / -4

No, because the jackpot is determined by tickets sold. the jackpot wouldn't be 1.28 billion unless they sold that many tickets.. The fact that lump sum is not the full amount is a tax itself

details Matter

3
analog_shitposter 3 points ago +3 / -0

No it isn’t, the lump sum is less (nominally) because it’s the present value of the annual payments over the period which add up to the jackpot number.

It’s a little misleading to compare the jackpot value to the present value net of taxes

4
FreeUrsulaHaverbeck 4 points ago +9 / -5

Every single person on here should have stopped buying lottery tickets by now. Yes even you, the one reading this. You love your scratch offs? Learn self restraint. Buy rice instead with the money.

5
elcomedian 5 points ago +6 / -1

Carbs are gay

3
FreeUrsulaHaverbeck 3 points ago +4 / -1

I mean yeah, I eat a low carb diet for workouts too, dude. But when the oil’s cut off and the trucks stop coming, you’re gonna need some dry, calorie-dense food to tide you over unless you’ve already got a farm to feed yourself .

1
PresidentBidet 1 point ago +1 / -0

fake and ghey

1
BigDickTurner 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. Im going to keep playing, because the cost of playing is so low its irrelevant and the consequence of winning is being able to save everyone i love from the hell that is upon us.

4
notCIA 4 points ago +4 / -0

To be fair, half that 800 mil was lost because they chose lump sum over lifetime layments. The crooks only got 313.5 mil

4
magaspif 4 points ago +4 / -0

Annuity is almost always better if you want to spend at that rate - you'd have to get an average return of almost 8% to beat it (and have the same amount to spend every year). (ie if you put the lump sum in investments and then drew down the same amount)

Now if you just sat on it and spent less, then it's a completely different story - lump sum would easily beat it.

5
jctbg20 5 points ago +5 / -0

Have you seen inflation?

2
magaspif 2 points ago +2 / -0

if you spend at that rate... otherwise if you invest it, that's generational wealth creating. a wise person would not burn through 6mil a year initially

3
Brellin 3 points ago +4 / -1

Average rate of return on the market is like 10% dude, has been for almost a century. You just gotta invest intelligently, typically in low risk stuff like index or mutual funds

2
magaspif 2 points ago +2 / -0

no it isn't. that's what they tell you but it's closer to 6-8% losses hit you much harder than what they consider "average" - you can't simply average your return every year, it just doesn't work that way at all.

2
Brellin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pede a family member of mine has been doing mutual fund investments and has had around 10% average return for the last 8 years running.

1
magaspif 1 point ago +1 / -0

including this year? If you lose 10% one year, you can't just gain 10% the next year and call it a net gain of 5%. Fees, taxes, etc. all have to be considered as well - otherwise it's just a net gain.

1
Brellin 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's why I said average, and yes 10% average over the last 8 years.

1
elcomedian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unless you’re a Pesoli then it’s 30%

4
Edial 4 points ago +4 / -0

This shouldn't be legal whatsoever. That's daylight robbery ffs.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
nomoreprinkles 3 points ago +3 / -0

Think of all the crack dens that will help build!

3
Bearjew 3 points ago +3 / -0

All of it goes to illegals.

3
Ullyr_Atreides 3 points ago +3 / -0

He should've taken the payout over 30 years and strung the IRS along for twice as long.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
BeefyBelisarius 0 points ago +1 / -1

Then inflation devours the future payments. You'll get better returns if you take the lump sum and immediately invest it. Assuming you have the willpower not to go on a spending spree.

3
AmericaAllDay 3 points ago +3 / -0

How the fuck is this legal???

2
Josemarti 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's so fucking evil that so much of the media is pushing the lottery right now.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Luckycoz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Aaaaand it’s Ukraine’s.

2
DonLemonParty 2 points ago +2 / -0

And you bet your sweet ass it'll be sent to Ukraine.

2
MikelovesTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

It will end up in Ukraine

2
realSvenLaden8 2 points ago +2 / -0

They took the 600m payout and paid like 30% in tax.

2
MasterVader2U 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's all going to Ukraine to be washed.

2
Pelosi_Halitosis 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have absolutely 0 fomo about the lottery, game machines or casinos. Although, I will one day go drop a C-note on a game machine. I've threatened to do so for years, so some day I will. But in all seriousness, I do have a pull tab retirement account.

2
Mexicola1976 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tbf, the 1.28 billion is cut in half because of lump sum option. Then that amount is taxed.

1
Slothboy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep

2
OwnaLib87 2 points ago +2 / -0

You havent seen nothin yet!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
mainsoda 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fucking crooks

1
PlanetBrain 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lottery winnings aren't taxed in the UK. That's just pure theft.

1
Ivleeeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its not taxes that took that much, it's forfeiture by picking the lump sum rather than annual payments.

1
Crapachino 1 point ago +1 / -0

Boycott lotteries. The criminals in the government are the only ones winning.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
1
Canadiapede7 1 point ago +1 / -0

What the fuck? so tax is now like 70%?

1
Hunter_loves_2_feet 1 point ago +1 / -0

He was smart to take the most now. The government won’t be able to pay soon enough.

1
Schwungle 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's really more like 350m split between the state and the federal government.

1.28b if paid over 30 years = 768m (60%) for lump sum. They taxed the 768.

1
AmericaFloats 1 point ago +1 / -0

Abscond.

1
j2daeww 1 point ago +1 / -0

How many politicians got greased on the lottery? The mafia created this and politicians made it legal

1
Cantshadowbanthemall 1 point ago +1 / -0

Before income tax there were lotteries

But that isn't how the lottery works, cash value versus future value based on ~30 years of payments.

1
Rylan 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s a lot of dick chopping surgeries

1
Wolfebane84 1 point ago +1 / -0

So wait.

They chose the lump sum Which is roughly 700 million and have to pay over half in taxes.

So the 1.2 billion dollars actually drops down to 300 million dollars....

Holy Fucking God.....

1
EyesSewnShut 1 point ago +1 / -0

And 1.28 billion was 50% of the sales. They already took half.

1
stagolee 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope. If you take the cash payout you get the annuity value, which is like 2/3 of the total, and then you pay the tax on that. So it’s not anything like 800 million. He probably got like ~800 million in winnings and lost close to half of that.

The full amount is only if you payout over 20 years. This is all very bad, misinformed math.

1
NvJohansson 1 point ago +1 / -0

TIL there is zero tax on lottery winnings in Canada. The only thing you'll ever have to pay on those winnings is incometax on the interest you'll make in profits going forward. Surprising such a commie country is looser than us on that.

1
TommyJarvis 1 point ago +1 / -0

All that money won’t give you what you need in life. It’ll just give you headaches and obsessions.

1
General_Specific 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is probably a set up to begin with lol. This makes me think the whole lottery system, already just a tax for people who suck at match, is just another tax funnel at it's core. Not just for the losers, the big payout is taxing the winner...