1482
Comments (349)
sorted by:
97
Asilimum 97 points ago +98 / -1

wtf are his lawyers doing, fire them already

53
deleted 53 points ago +53 / -0
21
deleted 21 points ago +26 / -5
18
BerkeleyKM 18 points ago +18 / -0

Even lawyers say if they represent themselves they have a fool for a client.

5
BlackPillBot 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yup.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
-13
itsarace2016 -13 points ago +11 / -24

Love how you chose to just randomly be antisemitic when our judicial system is very much based on the United Kingdom's and Roman empire's judicial systems.

Just be glad they didn't keep the powdered wigs.

9
deleted 9 points ago +18 / -9
14
CrispyQuesoSalami 14 points ago +15 / -1

What I always say when they call me "something-phobic".

Phobic implies I'm afraid of something.

Believe me when I tell you, I'm not afraid of any of them. I'm simply varying degrees of intolerant/hostile to fuckery and degeneracy.

5
NateBedfordForrest 5 points ago +6 / -1

It's ok to be antisemitic. You have that right.

-5
itsarace2016 -5 points ago +5 / -10

Wanna elaborate on the distinction there bud?

7
BlackPillBot 7 points ago +10 / -3

It’s pretty self explanatory to anyone with an IQ above 65.

-5
itsarace2016 -5 points ago +4 / -9

Oh is that your own personal scoring? Sorry to hear that.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-2
itsarace2016 -2 points ago +2 / -4

No I'm pretty sure that's all just antisemitism. But thanks for playing.

7
Plazma10 7 points ago +11 / -4

I wonder why all comments critical of Jewish supremacy and subversiveness are removed from patriots.win. Aren't you curious at all?

-1
itsarace2016 -1 points ago +4 / -5

Yeah ever notice Rule 3 right there on the side? That's why.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wrong. Eat shit, paid shill.

-2
itsarace2016 -2 points ago +1 / -3

.....so rule 3, thats right over there, doesn't say no racism?

1
VolareVia 1 point ago +2 / -1

People like Plazma10 loooove to talk about group average intelligences for the various races and talk about how that is a major determinant of success right up until you ask them about the group average intelligence of Askenazi Jews... then it's conspiracy that makes (((them))) successful. No other explanation. Definitely conspiracy...

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

Except there is no data whatsoever that says jewish IQ is higher than that of whites. You have no citations to provide and will never have any. No double blind random sampled study has ever been taken of jews. Their average IQ is 98, by broader sampling. You failed.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
Plazma10 1 point ago +2 / -1

Whats bigoted about defending a country and culture from an invading nation and their supremacist control?

-1
itsarace2016 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Also its just not even fucking true. Its just really the laziest of boogeymen.

Jews have been in America as much as anyone else who came here by boat. There were Jewish communities in the colonies in the 1600s.

-3
itsarace2016 -3 points ago +1 / -4

Because thats not what your doing. You're just being a dick online.

Also idfk. I didn't write the rules. I just told a guy the Jews weren't responsible as the origins of the US legal systems and then you tightey whiteys showed up.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-8
itsarace2016 -8 points ago +1 / -9

I'm sure they're getting laid plenty without you offering. Appreciate it though. Maybe buy me a drink first?

0
Devolution_Bishes 0 points ago +1 / -1

Who the heck is pro Semites? All they've brought to the world are Mesapotamian blood cults.

''The magic rat says sexually mutilate your children for me!''

''The sky molester said you can sleep with anybody's kid, it's ok they're all to be exterminated by the sky molester's people, anyway. Terrorized, belittled, humiliated, because after all, the magic sky molester gave US the WHOLE planet, and the rest of you are just bitches!''

''All of you should be paying 10% of your income to tax free dudes, who will explain to you about the marvelous ways of the sky molester!

''The magic rat is reading everyone's minds! He can do that because he's the god of some child molesting hicks from the middle east!!''

You sound as insane as the Semite child molester religions do.

-1
itsarace2016 -1 points ago +1 / -2

First of all, semantics time! The Semite in antisemite is referring to the linguistic basis for Hebrew, not race or ethnicity. Just so you can be a more accurate bigot in the future.

Second of all, I'm not the one that just went on a really weird rant about a rat(?) making up quotes so not sure how I'm the one that sounds crazy.

Thirdly, pretty sure the things you're raving about are pretty Christian (Jews don't really have tithing, that's Mormons). But its hard to be sure because you know... ravings.

Fourth and final: you okay bro?

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Semite in antisemite is referring to the linguistic basis for Hebrew, not race or ethnicity.

So it has nothing to do with jews and you have no leg to stand on? Thanks for admitting it.

Just so you can be a more accurate bigot in the future.

Truth isn’t bigotry, coward.

0
itsarace2016 0 points ago +1 / -1

...what? What leg? What stance have I taken? And how in the world would that undermine it?

hahahahaha go take your meds dude

1
Devolution_Bishes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wrong answer about the tithing, hillbilly.

The Torah has NUMEROUS references to tithings,

and THAT has come forward to the Christians as THEIR teaching about tithings.

They didn't make it up on their own, , they got it from the Jews.

Y. E. S,

T. H. E. Y.

D. i. D.

"The practice of tithing first appears in the Torah, not as a commandment, but as a practice done by the patriarchs.

After Abraham’s military victory over the four kings who attacked Sodom, he gave a tenth of the spoils to “Malkitzedek . . . priest of G‑d.”1 The Midrash also states that Yitzchak tithed his produce.2

Similarly, while fleeing to his uncle Laban from his brother Eisau, Jacob prayed: “If G‑d will be with me . . . and gives me bread to eat and clothing to wear, and I return in peace to my father’s house, then . . . from all that you shall give me I will give a tenth to you.”

You thought you'd just glibly MAKE SHIT UP about Jews' religious tithes, not being the source of it in Christianity.

There are even multiple articles on the ancient origins of various tithes originating in Judaism itself

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tithes_in_Judaism

0
itsarace2016 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes this was all a giant conspiracy, buried deep here in a pretty remote and unknown forum, to start my evils scheme to rebrand Jewish tithing. How could I ever have been found out.

Do you want to rant some more?

1
Devolution_Bishes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah no shit it's about the Semitic languages, that's why I said Mesopotamian blood cults, dumb fuck.

The rest of your dithering's about as intelligent as you notifying everyone how proud you are, you knew the origin of Semitic.

''Thay ain't got nair thithes, and ain't had nair'N!''

You dumb hick.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tithe

"Traditional Jewish law and practice has included various forms of tithing since ancient times. Orthodox Jews commonly practice ma'aser kesafim (tithing 10% of their income to charity)."

0
itsarace2016 0 points ago +1 / -1

Like why are you so obsessed with me.

6
CrispyQuesoSalami 6 points ago +6 / -0

The judicial system is the epitome of an industry constantly justifying their own existence.

Just look at how laws are written.

In stead of "don't shit on the sidewalk, that's 5 to 10", it's "Defication or release of other such fluid from one's person as a result of natural functions of the digestive or other similar processes is deemed to be a public nuisance and also presents an existential health hazard.......etc etc etc".

They over word, double talk and build shit up so that only they really have the seer stone needed to interpret it correctly.

And that's why our government sucks, it's filled with lawyers and only lawyers. All three branches of elected officials, their staffs, the appointed bureaucracy and their staffs....just a bunch of lawyers circlejerking each other to insulate their thievery and deceit.

2
signington 2 points ago +2 / -0

If "don't shit on the sidewalk" is what you think is a good replacement, you're clearly not cut out for this.

I'm not a lawyer, but I've read a lot of state law, and 99% of it is perfectly understandable to anyone with a high school education. Especially the parts of the law that ordinary citizens would care about (like the criminal code).

And the modern style of law-writing is about a thousand times more clear and simple than what paragraphs looked like in the 1700s.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
21
Taqiyya_Mockingbird 21 points ago +21 / -0

When the opposition received it they are ethically obligated to not look at it, destroy it and inform his lawyer that he messed up. Barnes was on talking about that yesterday.

11
PraiseBeToScience 11 points ago +12 / -1

I'm totally sure the bergs and steins at the BAR association will be all over this.

7
GoGoGadgetGringo 7 points ago +7 / -0

That’s assuming a cackle of Democrat attorneys are moral and ethical

0
DeadOverRed 0 points ago +1 / -1

Sorry, that's not exactly true

10
deleted 10 points ago +13 / -3
6
GoGoGadgetGringo 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is the only thing that makes sense to me

2
TenaciousDT 2 points ago +2 / -0

My thoughts exactly, its a Jones 5D chess move.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
TenaciousDT 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wouldnt they have been fired already if that were the case, though?

2
Asilimum 2 points ago +3 / -1

They just gave the phone records to the Jan 6th committee as well, suuurely that's also part of the plan

3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
2
ImportantPerson 2 points ago +2 / -0

The answer to your question is the same reason why you don't talk to police officers. They aren't looking for anything that exonerates you. They are looking for anything they can use to incriminate you.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tomorrow is STFU FRIDAY!

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

Alex, unlike some morons here, doesnt use texts to explain his plans , where he is going, or what he believes. He doesnt use emails , and certainly wouldnt use them to ramble on about anything controversial or remotely questionable. He knows better.

Are you fucking stupid, mate? He watches tranny porn on his phone and is paid by globalists to be controlled opposition. He has no plans, and if he did he would still use texts and email to explain them, because that’s how these things work these days. For fuck’s sake, stop pretending that your enemies’ narrative is real.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +1 / -2

Thanks for admitting you have no response to my statements of fact. Go watch your penis pill salesmen get bankrupted and then move on to your next god, Q-LARP.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-2
Fidget -2 points ago +2 / -4

Says who? I heard they reached out to Alex’s attorney asking if it was confidential and they never responded, so it’s admissible.

10
johnzo73 10 points ago +10 / -0

They reached out to his lawyers at 11:30 PM Friday and his lawyers responded at 6:00 AM Saturday. Did you read the article?

1
Fidget 1 point ago +1 / -0

How much time is required by law?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
gunteh 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you’re saying it’s 4D chess? And what would have happened if the plaintiffs never used the information against Jones in court?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
itsarace2016 0 points ago +1 / -1

It wasn't there timing. It was the response itself.

"Bankston retorted that Reynal had sent him the enormous cache of documents, then followed up only with the words “Please disregard” in an email, which, he argued, is legally meaningless. Reynal was required to cite specific privileged documents within 10 days, he said, and state why they were privileged and confidential. Reynal never did that, Bankston added. The phrase “please disregard” on their own “creates no legal duty on me whatsoever,” he said."

7
VivaElEmperadorDios 7 points ago +7 / -0

There's a picture of the email as well as the response in the article. They absolutely responded. It's in no way admissible.

0
itsarace2016 0 points ago +1 / -1

"Bankston retorted that Reynal had sent him the enormous cache of documents, then followed up only with the words “Please disregard” in an email, which, he argued, is legally meaningless. Reynal was required to cite specific privileged documents within 10 days, he said, and state why they were privileged and confidential. Reynal never did that, Bankston added. The phrase “please disregard” on their own “creates no legal duty on me whatsoever,” he said."

He didn't do it correctly.

1
VivaElEmperadorDios 1 point ago +1 / -0

He didn't do it correctly.

Surely that was an accident.

1
itsarace2016 1 point ago +1 / -0

He went to law school to learn how to do exactly this, and other balls he dropped, correctly. If it was an accident, it was a basic one that he should have made sure didn't occur. Its a major immense screw up.

1
VivaElEmperadorDios 1 point ago +1 / -0

In 2022, never attribute to incompetence that which is adequately explained by malice.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
CrustySockpuppet 5 points ago +5 / -0

Probably playing Soros Says

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
60
deleted 60 points ago +60 / -0
16
MoreTorbaLessKushner 16 points ago +18 / -2

Sounds like we need to eliminate the source(s) of their power.

2
gunteh 2 points ago +2 / -0

The money?

-20
Uzkekistani -20 points ago +17 / -37

....this was a civil lawsuit. He did not fully comply with court orders prior to the case, which makes him automatically liable. The current hearing is to determine how much he will pay.

This isn't some freedom-opressing kangaroo court. This is a civil case, where judges usually act even MORE outrageous than this, because it is their courtroom

25
OIKOBOIKO 25 points ago +25 / -0

Maybe it's just the American in me, but making someone automatically liable just for noncompliance with court orders is wrong. Make it a crime for noncompliance, sure, but automatic liability is bullshit.

1
signington 1 point ago +2 / -1

Default judgment usually isn't the first sanction against noncompliance. A judge will usually only resort to it when other sanctions have failed to work, or the defendant just never shows up to court in the first place.

If a defendant makes a reasonable argument for why they neglected to respond, and if a glance at their theory of defense shows it is winnable to the judge, they will probably set aside the default judgment.

But I'm guessing Alex Jones was more-or-less obviously liable for the initial claims for damages. So when he decided to fuck around and ignore the court's orders, the court had no problem with just entering default judgment.

16
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 16 points ago +17 / -1

He did not fully comply with court orders

That's the Plaintiff's lawyer's talking point. They requested documents that they know do not exist, when Alex couldn't produce the documents (because they don't exist) he was defaulted by an activist judge. While it's true that he was defaulted for not complying with court orders the facts of the matter show that this talking point is deceptive at best as it does not give full context to the situation.

15
Pres_Trump 15 points ago +15 / -0

What exactly does "fully comply" mean? I am sure some Judge ruled on this... this Court proceeding is a biased bullshit smear campaign meant to discourage ANYONE from questioning the status quo. Are you completely delusional or just a little?

2
RedAltoids 2 points ago +2 / -0

fully comply

Probably something like fully vaccinated.

10
JuliusEvola 10 points ago +16 / -6

Sued over something Jim Fetzer proved was a false flag.

This court is a joke and so is your comment.

Why is there pictures of the same girl "who died" 51 days later singing at the Super Bowl?

Why did the put gag orders on the demolition crews who tore down the old building?

Why didn't the families hand over attendance records in the Remington case?

Why was there no activity/hits on the school's website for multiple years before?

Why was an Israeli agent ushering kids out of the school?

Why did Eric Holder say we really need to brainwash people to support gun control?

Bitchute has all the goods. Only place you can find it give how the lying controllers of our society has banned everyone worth their salt from every major platform.

Dumb ass

-2
PraiseBeToScience -2 points ago +1 / -3

Bitchute has all the goods.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/aP1sQ50cBo82/

Here's "Dear Wolfgang", your Sandy Hook conspiracy 'Bible'.

At 21:40 he says "Adam Lazna carried over 50 pounds of ammunition". Those exact words.

https://patriots.win/p/15HvBeWKKm/x/c/4OYXXCDcCk5

Here is where I went through the weight of every single magazine, weapon, and bullet that Lanza was listed as having, using an anti-gun source just to make sure I had the most biased possible numbers (working against my favor as they are most likely to exaggerate).

The total of not just the "ammunition", but the guns and magazines, was less than 35 pounds.

Meaning your conspiracy faggot clown is an outright liar. He lied. What he did was blatantly lie. And best of all he knew he was lying, because that's a stupid fucking 'error', nobody who has ever handled any quantity of ammo could think that 50 pounds of ammo was reasonable, that's literally over 1,000 rounds of 5.56mm.

So, when I can prove that your "truth seeker" is an outright liar, by all means, tell me, what makes you think that anything that subhuman lying piece of utter shit says about anything else is anything but a fucking lie?

Lies you believe, because you'll believe anything your told.

-1
JuliusEvola -1 points ago +1 / -2

How did the principle of SH give a quote about the shooting to the press, when she died during the shooting?

Why does Robbie Parker laugh so much in the aftermath of the "shooting" as a "grieving parent?"

Why is Noah Pozner's stock photo used in a family post with the wrong name?

Why did the demolition crew for SH get gag orders?

Why are so many parents anti-gun actors?

Why should I become a disarmed slave just because I don't feel bad for their kids who never died? At least not the ones in the photos they're showing us. One girl sang at the Super Bowl 51 days later.

You sound like a big mad liberal shill or an egotistical person who is projecting onto me what you actually are.

If you can refute the evidence underneath and Jim Fetzer's I will apologize and eat my words.

But that will never happen because they are right and that's why they are cutting off patriot's tongues who see through the lies.

The truth is too dangerous for tyrants - they can only give you the illusion they are telling the truth by suing people like Jones & Remington in a rigged as hell court case where they're not allowed to fight back and their subpoenas get denied.

Fag.

https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=Sandy+hook

-1
PraiseBeToScience -1 points ago +1 / -2

I like how you just list nonsense like it's a real thing because you write it down.

-1
JuliusEvola -1 points ago +1 / -2

So, that's you good don't like liars.

Can you show me where Alex Jones claimed the kid was carrying this ammo?

Or was Alex Jones busy showing us the FBI UCR reports reported 0 murders in Newtown, CT in 2012?

And was he showing us videos of the laughing parents and how many of them were actors and how it didn't make sense the Sandy hook school website didn't have any hits for years before and how demolition crews of the school had gag orders placed on them?

You get hung up on 1 detail that I agree is dumb. But there are dozens of more damning pieces of info than that.

Like a girl who died sang at the supper bowl the following year.

Hello

-3
PraiseBeToScience -3 points ago +4 / -7

You mean the Bitchute video that claimed Lanza had 50 pounds of ammo and I had to painstakingly provr that that number was a blatant lie by using the stated weights from every manufacturer of everything he had?

Something zero of you idiots bothered to do yourself because you blindly believe everything you're told?

I bet there's zero real evidence for anything you're claiming, just half baked assumptions and doctored nonsense. You Qlowns never have actual evidence, did you never notice that? Thousands of stupid conspiracies you fall for and all your evidence is "nameless witnesses say" and "analyzing the pixels".

5
Bogey 5 points ago +5 / -0

The best was how they "proved" the gun was in the car when it's clearly a shotgun with a tactical stock but the 'truthseekers' can't tell the difference.

Q was the best intel op ever created in the history of the world. It weaponized the anti-gov people against the anti-gov movement by inserting bad info and absurdity into it.

2
PraiseBeToScience 2 points ago +4 / -2

I'm considerably anti-conspiracy theory, and it's not that conspiracy doesn't happen, but it's that I recognize there's basically nothing productive whatsoever to happen by diving into this shit. Conversely, by diving into it, you open the door for every single unmedicated schizo with an internet connection to show up and spew insanity and they just invite more and more pointless hysteria that makes everybody stupid and paranoid, and stupid paranoid people are easily manipulated and strawmannable.

That's exactly what's happened, if you pay attention. It isn't that "Sandy Hook was a hoax". It's that literally every single shooting, anywhere, ever, by anyone, is now a hoax. Every single shooting is a conspiracy. If you went to all the posts on all the shootings on this site, every single last damn one was an FBI plot. Never, not once, has some psychotic evil asshole ever just shot people for the fuck of it. They were all engineered operations. It's become a brain-melting addiction, and if you notice, all you have to do is ever-so-gently poke at the boundaries of where their conspiracy makes sense into the areas where it doesn't, and they get fantastically infuriated and shut down. That's because the conspiracy shit was never founded in sense, it was founded - much like the left - in groupthink, peer pressure, and amplification of dangerously stupid people.

We talk all the time here about not 'tolerating' lite-leftoidism because it's a slippery slope to degeneracy and communist faggotry. That's my position here. Conspiracy is a slippery slope to psychoticism and derangement, infighting, stupidity, and instability. Since worrying about conspiracy theory is essentially purposeless, and really can do nothing but hurt, why tolerate it?

Like okay let's say you believe Sandy Hook is fake. So what? It's been what... nearly 12 years. Every day you've been clinging to this shit. Thousands of hours of your life wasted watching endless Bitchute videos, analyzing the pixels, screaming on the internet.

And as a result, nobody new has ever been convinced. Nothing productive was accomplished. Nobody cares. You have no actionable evidence and even if it existed it's been so long you can never gather any. It literally doesn't fucking matter so what the hell is the point? What is the fantasy end state of this? You gonna round up the parents and execute them?

The thing is Im not even sure the Qonspiracy faggots even actually believe this shit. For example, let's say you're like that idiot and you are convinced that that one girl is still alive. You need evidence. So did any of these schizos try to gather any? Why not track down these undead children and gather genetic evidence? Question them? Investigate the two different people to get their names. Follow them around and build a dossier. All you have to do is come up with something more concrete than "this low res video sort of looks like her". If you want to believe that it's the same girl, fine, but that should be the BEGINNING of the investigation, not the END. You call up wherever she was singing and socially engineer your way into getting more info. Who invited her, what's her name, things like that. Instead it's a shitty picture of two clearly different people that some idiot with autism, a brain defect that has as one of it's symptoms an inability to recognize faces, just says that that's all the proof he needs and that's it.

If you actually believed that the government was this fantastically fucked and evil, why does evidence gathering involve not leaving your house and just reading shit on the internet? Everything digital is easily faked, I basically don't believe any digital evidence. AI can create full simulacrums at this point. Witnesses also aren't evidence, anyone can lie and we can never substantiate anything they say or if they're even real people.

Like the whole Joe Biden Body Double thing where they look at earlobes and say "look they're attached here and detached here!" Biden has one earlobe attached and one detached. The Qlowns fake this evidence by flipping images from the right to the left to make it look like the ear is changing.

If a conspiracy theorist has to lie about even one thing, it means everything else they say is probably also lies.

2
Bogey 2 points ago +2 / -0

Simply giving you a thumbs up is not adequate enough. I thank you for the clear, thorough, and most importantly, accurate answer.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Never, not once, has some psychotic evil asshole ever just shot people for the fuck of it.

No, dumbass. It's that glowfags leave their fingerprints all over it.

Find a mass shooting that wasn't within 100 miles and one month of a NRA Convention. That might be your random criminal.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Find a mass shootings that wasn't within 100 miles and one month of a NRA Convention.

S... so, literally Sandy Hook?

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +2 / -1

https://patriots.win/p/15HvBeWKKm/x/c/4OYXX7etjOB

Here we go - for some reason saved posts weren't showing up on my phone but they show up on PC.

Basically I was given their Bitchute "Sandy Hook Conspiracy Bible" where one asshole has some ridiculous video full of stupid nonsense, and they believe all of it.

I wasn't going to watch this hack faggot so I just skipped to a random spot in the video and where I landed, he said "Adam Lanza couldn't have carried all the ammo they claimed, it was 50 pounds and he only weighed 130! (or something)", as well as "only Navy SEALS could get a 99% kill rate!"

The latter statement is clearly fucking retarded, all conspiracy theorists do this stupid shit where they vaguely reference "cool" military shit yet they obviously are dipshits who don't know anything, but anyway, hey, good thing Sandy Hook wasn't even actually a "99%" kill rate.

https://patriots.win/p/15HvBeWKKm/x/c/4OYXXCDcCk5

Here is where I went through every single item's weight (with sources except for a couple things I couldn't find links to online so I weighed my own kit) and came up with 33.1 lbs of EVERYTHING, ammo and guns. The Bitchute video literally just claimed 50lb in ammo alone.


This is what Qonspirafaggots do. They literally believe anything they are told, as long as it's "counter-narrative", but then bitch about people who believe everything they are told. Not a single one of these baby-raping retards fucking thought to add up the weight themselves and checking that stupid queer in the video. They just believe it because it's "their guy" telling them exactly what they want to hear.

I fucking hate conspiracy theorists so much, they are so obviously immensely fucking stupid.

1
Bogey 1 point ago +1 / -0

Basic reason would tell anyone that our government would sooner pay a man to shoot up a school than fake the deaths of 2 dozen people.

These conspiracies always crank it up to 11 just to make normal dissidents look foolish.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +2 / -1

It's the same shit with the Pentagon missile nonsense. Absolutely nothing about a missile strike even begins to make sense if you have anything resembling more than two folds in your brain. No possible weapon on this planet could do the correct kind of damage, there's no explanation for the ancillary damage like the chopped-down light poles, they don't even begin to try to pretend to have come up with an explanation for how 100 tons of plane debris ended up all over the place, and nobody has ever even described what launch platform fired the missile and where it was located and if there's evidence for the platform's existence. I've had people try to tell me that it was a Tomahawk missile - the Pentagon is the largest low-lying office building in the world, and a Tomahawk is literally smaller than a pickup truck. It would've exploded in a little 'puff' and done nothing but ruin someone's office.

Here's the thing, kind of like what you are saying. If you're the government, and you want to fake an airliner attack on the Pentagon... wouldn't you just rig a remote-control airliner and fly it into the Pentagon?

Suddenly all the forensic evidence says it was an airliner. All the witnesses too. There's no passengers to 'clean up'. The debris is there. The damage matches what an airliner would do. Any cameras would catch an airliner doing exactly what you said.

But no, that isn't "cool enough", so they need to talk about crazy weapons and coolguy LARP shit so people will think they're badasses.

-1
JuliusEvola -1 points ago +1 / -2

Watch the Jim Fetzer ones

-6
horse_paste -6 points ago +5 / -11

Jones has stated under oath that Sandy Hook was "100% real".
https://youtu.be/AOQeCtFVAWM

3
akai_ferret 3 points ago +4 / -1

Do you honestly think he was allowed to say anything else?
The court automatically assumes it is real and they will ruthlessly punish anyone who dares say otherwise.

It was a trap.
He could either tell the truth and be railroaded or be forced to tell a lie, which is demoralizaion tactic. A lie which helps the prosecution's case no less.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
JuliusEvola 0 points ago +2 / -2

Yea in a rigged Soviet show trial where he wasn't even allowed to defend himself.

Just because the government puts a gun to your head and forces you to say what they want to hear doesn't make it true.

Jones's biggest mistake was letting off the gas and thinking he could apologize to this people.

He should've said, "I'm not a Sandy Hook denier. I'M A SUPER SANDY HOOK DENIER!"

5
TheTelltaleFly 5 points ago +5 / -0

The problem is he DID fully comply with discovery and was defaulted anyway.

48
jiminycricket1941 48 points ago +53 / -5

He’s going to get absolutely fucked and this trial shows all of us one thing. If we EVER get in the crosshairs of these people, we’re proper fucked.

12
MoreTorbaLessKushner 12 points ago +13 / -1

So, what? We roll over and die?

Because that's their goal.

9
BeefyBelisarius 9 points ago +9 / -0

Don't let the commies take you alive. If they come after you, take as many of them with you as you can. Seems that's the only alternative to ending up in front of a kangaroo court.

3
RedAltoids 3 points ago +3 / -0

About all you can do is not die alone.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

oy vey goyim your only option is to give up

you literally can never…

Wait, it’s you! Why are you saying things like this? You know we have way more options than that.

10
Censorddit 10 points ago +10 / -0

This isn't a trial.

4
Ella101 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nah, I think his lawers did this on purpose

4
Bernier4Canada 4 points ago +4 / -0

yeah call me crazy but if my lawyer "Accidentally" sends a digital copy of my entire phone to the lawyers of the other side... and then don't tell me or declare the info private...

this was 100% on purpose and it seems Jones' own lawyer hates him so much, that he's willing to ruin his career just to fuck him over.

2
magaspif 2 points ago +2 / -0

blame it on the paralegal lol

-9
Uzkekistani -9 points ago +17 / -26

It's not a trial

It never went to trial

He didn't follow court orders prior to this, and now it's just a hearing to see how much he has to pay

Some of y'all are as dumb as liberals, I swear

11
xkgb 11 points ago +11 / -0

He didn't follow court orders prior to this ...

He would disagree.

-10
itsarace2016 -10 points ago +1 / -11

He can disagree all he wants. Fact is he chose to talk shit on his show rather than comply and has burned through 2 other lawyers prior to this one because he refuses to take their advice.

This is very much a self-inflicted wound.

6
SowellWasRight 6 points ago +6 / -0

He provided more discovery than any Cnn, New York Times, or any defendant in a defamation trial before this. Hundreds of hours of deposition and millions of documents. The problem is the evidence they needed, Alex talking about the plaintiff specifically and financial analytics intending to profit off Sandy Hook, don't exist because their case is based on a fake news myth. They demonized Alex so much they actually started to believe their own bullshit. When the evidence wasn't there, the judge decided he must be hiding it or destroyed it and issued a default judgement of guilt to cover all their asses. She gets to be rewarded by being a movie star. The Leaving Neverland film crew is there with a camera trained on the jury box for their "documentary". She orchestrated the trial so they get all the clips they need for their propaganda; Alex can't even claim he is innocent or reference the 1st amendment. This is literally a show trial for a movie.

-1
itsarace2016 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Well that's a lot of hyperbole and feel free to back it up. But as of right now, the court held he was a dummy and chose not to participate.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21074211-alex-jones-default-judgment-orders-texas

4
Pres_Trump 4 points ago +4 / -0

It is only that because the powers that be want him gone. He did nothing wrong and has never done anything except use his 1st Amendment rights to have an opinion and say that opinion.

-5
itsarace2016 -5 points ago +1 / -6

Except you know defamation. He's now guilty of that and other things that aren't protected by the first amendment.

So he's done plenty wrong.

3
Pres_Trump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Show me where he defamed the kids and the parents specifically?

1
signington 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's well-known that Alex Jones repeatedly claimed Sandy Hook was a hoax and the parents were actors.

As to the question of whether those are defamatory statements, Alex Jones already lost by default judgment. He refused to comply with discovery orders, despite prior sanctions.

-2
itsarace2016 -2 points ago +1 / -3

Nah. Not my job. That's what the court case was about. You can go read up on it or watch it yourself.

Closing arguments for the plaintiff's lawyer prob a good place to start.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

fact is

But you have proven incapable of posting facts and have publicly admitted you don’t care about them. Why should anyone listen to you?

0
itsarace2016 0 points ago +1 / -1

I posted plenty. Sorry buddy. On another note let me know if I can help you pick up your meds. Or at least your next eye glasses perscription

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

I posted plenty

Of lies, yes. You did post plenty. No one gives a shit, though.

0
itsarace2016 0 points ago +1 / -1

ok

11
Krat 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yeah only democrats are allowed to ignore court orders like not turning over routers

9
N7fury 9 points ago +9 / -0

What are you talking about? Which case are you talking about, Scarlett Lewis V. Jones? There was a jury selection. This is a defamation trial to determine damages since he was defaulted. The court orders were bullshit with excessive discovery demands. Typically, there would be a motion for protective order granted. The judge you are defending is a frothing at the mouth radical leftist backed by Soros. She even ignored Jones's bankruptcy, which should have invoked a stay and halted the trial. It provides limited protection, which the judge is ignoring under federal law. Fuck that. Fuck this piece of shit judge  

8
JuliusEvola 8 points ago +10 / -2

^ Dan Crenshaw spamming the comments as if Jones is so guilty for asking questions.

6
Pres_Trump 6 points ago +6 / -0

Again, you keep throwing this "didn't follow court orders"...what does that have to do with liability? Moron.

31
Benchmade_user 31 points ago +32 / -1

All his phone records will be "leaked" in the coming months. His own lawyers destroyed him.

13
Skogin 13 points ago +13 / -0

If he was smart about how he used the phone, this may be a nothing burger.

3
Isaiah53 3 points ago +7 / -4

The chans caught him with gay porn tabs in several of his video segments, while he was waving his cell around on camera.

He tried to say his interns put it there.

8
Skogin 8 points ago +8 / -0

I have doubts about that story too.

3
45totheSky 3 points ago +3 / -0

"There are two types of people, those who watch porn, and those who lie about it -- and I was not watching porn."

  • Alexander Emerick Jones
1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s literally on his own videos.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
Magaman4200 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was only a 6 momth span

3
magaspif 3 points ago +3 / -0

anyone at his level should never be doing anything on an unsecured phone. hopefully people start realizing that the best protection is that nobody gives a shit about who you are. once you do, better buckle up and hope you are teflon.

2
Ella101 2 points ago +2 / -0

they probably did this on purpose to help his case get dismissed

2
signington 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's not how it works... Best case scenario, you get a do-over of the current damages phase with the text messages excluded from evidence. The default judgment isn't going to be dismissed.

Appellate court judges are not dumb.

1
BlackPillBot 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wouldn’t doubt if they doctor shit to show he’s “racist”, or a pedophile.

28
tom_machine 28 points ago +29 / -1

The blue hair judge has been all over him for “not complying with discovery” and barring him from saying anything that isn’t in evidence… watch her completely fucking ignore the exact same thing from the other side.

7
SowellWasRight 7 points ago +7 / -0

You say the judge is "all over him" for not complying with discovery? By "all over him" I assume you mean denying his constitutional right to a jury and issuing a default judgement of guilt based on her own opinion.

3
dontdrinksoy 3 points ago +3 / -0

The judge is a cunt.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-9
itsarace2016 -9 points ago +4 / -13

He insulted her and the jury on his radio show and then was shocked when they heard about it. The judge is correct to treat him like the idiot he's currently being.

And this isn't a trial; as you pointed out, this is to see how much he pays because he decided to not comply with the trial so he lost his case. He doesn't get to submit new evidence now. Aint how it works.

6
tom_machine 6 points ago +8 / -2

Did your lefty-tinted glasses block out the part where I said the opposing counsel will likely not be held to the same standard?

-6
itsarace2016 -6 points ago +4 / -10

...no I just it was clear that the trial is at the stage where, procedurally, what he's trying to do isn't allowed. It's not that favoritism is being shown, its that its not being shown at all and especially to him by not allowing him try to do an "whoopsie take backs please". Trials over and they were showing that damages should be higher because of his multiple violations of his oath to truth.

And it's probably to his own benefit. He put himself up in the witness stand and then they got to show how many times he committed perjury.

He's a dummy and a grifter. The less he talks the better off he probably is.

4
npc_NULL 4 points ago +4 / -0

He never had a trial faggot

4
tom_machine 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hey obvious lefty retard, this post is about evidence being introduced (illegally) by the PLAINTIFF, you absolute fuck wit.

-4
itsarace2016 -4 points ago +1 / -5

Except it wasn't illegal? They were arguing he deserved to pay max damages. Notice how his lawyer didn't even object?

4
tom_machine 4 points ago +4 / -0

I forgot how you can just introduce facts not in evidence during cross examination, in clear violation of attorney client privilege... Jones's attorneys sucking ass doesn't make the rest of the court room not crooks

-1
itsarace2016 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Except they followed procedure and made the case that Jones' lawyers never responded, which makes it usable (according to them) after a set period of time, which they waited out. I guess we'll see when he gets charged with perjury if the claim that they did in fact respond holds up.

5
SowellWasRight 5 points ago +5 / -0

Judges do NOT get to just decide that you are guilty. You have a constitutional right to have a jury decide your guilt. Default judgements like she made are reserved for only the most extreme situations where a defendant does not show up for anything to go on a vacation. In this case, Jones DID comply with discovery. She issued this default judgement of guilt because even with the massive amount of evidence provided by Jones in discovery, the plaintiff still had no case. Jones never mentioned the plaintiff by name, which by the way is 100% required in defamation, never profited from it and 99.9% of all reporting by infowars claimed that Sandy Hook actually happened.

-2
itsarace2016 -2 points ago +1 / -3

Yeah you're absolutely right. She's not deciding his guilt. The jury, who he also insulted on his show, does. Where you're wrong is that he evidentially failed to live up to the court's standard of cooperation. He rightfully earned the default judgement.

Source: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21074211-alex-jones-default-judgment-orders-texas

And somehow I doubt your view of the proceedings is accurate because yeah... its not. He's lost all the defamation lawsuits filed so far.

Source: https://www.texastribune.org/2022/08/02/alex-jones-sandy-hook-defamation-trial/

I don't think that happens when there's no case for defamation.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

courts are crooked therefore legal definitions don’t exist at all

Literally reading from the sophist’s script.

-16
deleted -16 points ago +2 / -18
4
TheTelltaleFly 4 points ago +4 / -0

So that makes it ok?

-7
itsarace2016 -7 points ago +1 / -8

Yes. He had the opportunity to do what he'd like to do now but he purposefully squandered it. He's a dummy.

16
CentralAmericanPede 16 points ago +17 / -1

Lawyers(with very few exceptions) are left wing scumbags. Doesn't surprise me that they sold him out.

-5
itsarace2016 -5 points ago +1 / -6

The Federalist Society has ~60k members. And that's just conservative minded people who are interested in that cause. Its not that rare at all.

4
BeefyBelisarius 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's 1.3 million lawyers in the country according to the national bar association. 60k based ones is a pretty tiny minority.

0
itsarace2016 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yeah that's one association with a very specific cause, to get conservatives into the judiciary. There are other conservative minded groups and conservative lawyers who aren't represented in any of them.

Just showing its not going to be shockingly rare.

13
deleted 13 points ago +15 / -2
9
sully 9 points ago +9 / -0

Especially the two who are suing Jones. Waited literally six years? Get outta here. I would have thrown that shit out immediately. You don't sit on something like this for six years and decide to sue Alex Jones after his wealth conveniently grew since 2012. The fact that Jones didn't mention either plaintiff by name, and the plaintiffs hadn't even seen Jones' broadcasts until years later is all you need to know about what kind of people these individuals are.

Then that whole thing a few days ago where the plaintiffs just walk up to Jones after the court session to give Jones cough drops and water and to talk and shake hands is just icing on the cake that this whole trial is a sham.

3
Basedsliceofwinning 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jones didn't even invent the: Sandy Hook was staged! meme.

There was a viral youtube documentary mere days afterwards.

3
KrellKrypto 3 points ago +4 / -1

im convinced sandy hook was fake, sue me, I will actually prove it was fake in court. FBI GIVE ME YO SHIT

12
AmannamedRJ 12 points ago +12 / -0

Reminder: All of this is because hee questioned an official narrative. In what way is it illegal to question whether an event happened? How is it defamatory in any fucking universe to do this?

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

nazi Germany should be giving you deja Vu.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +1 / -2

In which way.

10
Jammyjams 10 points ago +10 / -0

Bankston is a piece of shit Soros buttfuck toy.This was definitely PR stunt and should result in mistrial. This is dirty as hell.

How much corruption are we going to take before the people rise up and do something? What is the point of this Sandy Hook bullshit? He has a right to say whatever the hell he wants under 1A.

This is the left trying to scare people into submission. Travis County is a libtard bullshit county, going down the same road as shit holes like LA, San Fran, Chicago, Portland.

That judge is definitely a libtard whore as well. I know because I live in Travis County.

So corrupt. This is definitely a violation. I fuckin hate the left. These people are the Enemies of the USA.

-6
itsarace2016 -6 points ago +1 / -7

That judge is definitely a libtard whore as well. I know because I live in Travis County.

You know a judge's political leanings because you live in the county?

Also its too late for a mistrial. He already lost; they're in the stage where they're deciding damages.

5
Jammyjams 5 points ago +5 / -0

If you think this wasn't a fucking BS, with a political activist as a judge, you're retarded. Did you see how she was treating him? Obviously hates his guts.

Wake up. Or, you're a libtard gender confused idiot that can't use common sense observing situations. I am guessing the latter.

Here's a tip. Look between your thighs, a great clue as to what gender you are.

-2
itsarace2016 -2 points ago +1 / -3

Yeah no shit she does. He literally called her a pedophile on his show just this week. He's an idiot and has shown it throughout this trial. Of course she's going treat him with contempt; he's deserving of it.

I can leave you to have some alone time with that strawman you're building over there.... but maybe don't fuck it? Sounds painful.

0
CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +0 / -0

YWNBAW.

-1
itsarace2016 -1 points ago +1 / -2

gesundheit

Sorry was that supposed to be a gotcha? I would say you could borrow some straw from the other guy but I don't know if anyone of us wants to touch it anymore...

7
Conspiracytheorist 7 points ago +8 / -1

I’m not sure why Alex didn’t ask to have the trial thrown out due to incompetency of his lawyers. I also think the prosecution should be held accountable asking for certain things but getting more things than they asked for and not letting the judge and defense know about it. Scummy

-7
itsarace2016 -7 points ago +1 / -8

He's past the trial stage. He lost because he tried to ignore it was happening.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
5
Cuenom 5 points ago +5 / -0

Is this one of the grieving parents....?

https://youtu.be/-KRBgar3mLI

5
keepwinning 5 points ago +5 / -0

Don't worry, J6 committee is on it now

4
KrellKrypto 4 points ago +4 / -0

so do you guys think sandy hook WASNT a false flag?

i don't understand? you cant be defamed for the truth, and i have seen zero evidence to prove the it WASNT a false flag attack.

how would you prove the negative in order to charge defamation?

god lawyers are the dumbest fuckers on the planet, second only to doctors.

4
NoNewOrder 4 points ago +4 / -0

so then, its actually a bigger problem for opposing counsel -- and could result in a mistrial -- although I think that short little prick would like that because I don't think he made a good case -- Jones totally muddied up the ENTIRE ISSUE.

Lesson still is, though, lawyers are NOT your friends! Always remember that! I'm not saying this snidely either, I'm serious. Always pay attention if you think YOUR lawyer isn't doing something correctly -- HOWEVER don't report them to the bar or other "legal" disciplinary agencies -- because they won't help you -- I know!

They will get info from you, tell you there's nothing they can do because the case is still in-progress, and then inform the lawyers as part of an "investigation."

The entire system is truly corrupt. Instead, find a real asshole lawyer to go after your attorney if they fuck you -- and best to get one from a different state

I'm not a lawyer or giving legal advice lol I'm learning myself -- through a lot of pain and suffering -- but my kids will be better for it as I will PROPERLY educate them!

3
ObamakilledJoan 3 points ago +3 / -0

So his attorneys are either complicit or fucking retards.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Porque no los dos?

2
ObamakilledJoan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Okay, maybe they are both.

3
IllKissYourBoobies 3 points ago +3 / -0

What a fuck up.

3
MAGAnology 3 points ago +5 / -2

It doesn't matter what counter lawsuits, appeals, or motions they file. The radical, demonic left have chosen their first target: Alex Jones. No laws, no procedures, no privileges, no person is going to get in their way.

This is their plan for all of us. Isolate us into small groups, then pick off our leaders one by one, maximum demoralization. No, if they take Alex Jones down this should light a fire under all our asses to get even more politically, financially, socially active, and unite as many people in our community as we can.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

AJ is not the first. DJT, Steve Bannon, General Flynn ... many others in the likeness of JFK and Nixon. I also expect more Arkancidation to SCOTUS..

Brietbart's book summed it up nicely.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Bigjay 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is next level subversive shit. What a stitch up. You can smell the glow a mile away.....

3
Censorddit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Kangaroo, bribes, toss it all out. The man's protected. Or should be.

2
WakeUpWorld 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe they sent it on purpose to set bait for other team to take it.

2
suzookus 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is why I have my iPhone set to only store 30 days of text messages!

Sure there might be something I lose but … no way anyone can get my messages off my phone after that.

2
MarginofFraud 2 points ago +2 / -0

Essentially the prosecutors noticed the information was in error and notified the defense who exercises their right over privileged documents and said "disregard that." The prosecution then used it anyway because they didn't consider the request to "disregard" to mean the same thing as "this is privileged information we sent in error and you cannot use it."

Were Jones' lawyers sloppy for sending the doc in the first place? 100%. Were they sloppy in exercising atty-client privilege? Sure.

But this was still inappropriate behavior by the prosecution. And aside from the damaging headlines, this was brought up in court which will have an irreversible prejudicial impact on the jury.

2
deplorablebot 2 points ago +2 / -0

The plaintiffs' attorney may have just provided Jones a win on appeal if he can get a decent judge. It was improper and possibly illegal for them to use that material on cross examination.

2
KrellKrypto 2 points ago +2 / -0

isnt that a breach of client private?

would that not be an invalidating factor?

1
TheWhitestOfFangs 1 point ago +1 / -0

The claim is that his lawyer presented the material by mistake and didn't act to demand protection as privileged client-attorney material (he probably didn't even know it's there, most likely some IT person did it all for him).

2
KrellKrypto 2 points ago +2 / -0

thats not how it works is it?

you dont have to request your rights, you always have them.

I would assume the lawyer would have to GET permission to share anything. there is no way it can be shared by default?

1
Barthaneous 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus Christ gave the Lawyers of the earth Warning. Don't forget it.

Luke 11:45-46 Then answered one of the lawyers, and said unto him, Master, are you saying thou reproachest us also.

[46] And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be born, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.

Luke 11:49-52

Therefore also said the wisdom of God, I will send them prophets and apostles, and some of them they shall slay and persecute:

[50] That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from the foundation of the world, may be required of this generation;

[51] From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, which perished between the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required of this generation.

[52] Woe unto you, (( lawyers! )) for ye have taken away the key of knowledge ( aka Law) ; ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.

Even Paul himself knowing the Law and being once a Pharisee, he stood up for himself and had no man stand before him.

Every true Christian must know the Laws of God first, the laws of Individual responsibilities i.e leaders, ruler , servants , husbands , father, teacher , student and of all manner of behavior, of righteous judgement on civil matters within tolerance and intolerance. Without these things as Peter said himself in his second book that many shall fall away , be confused and be corrupted by Paul's own writings if they don't know the law. For he without the knowledge of the law you will be mislead.

Don't let a man of the the current Law represent you. Let him help guide you on tradition, and rules of tolerance and intolerance.

Then you present your case before all.

If you're guilty of a basic crime however remain silent. But if your guilty of breaking no commandment and law of God then as Paul you stand up and put forth your hand and let everyone know the who and what is the Truth.

1
utfanx2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Alex Jones is going to be rich suing not just his lawyers, but MSM for defamation.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
TheWhitestOfFangs 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sure that the prosecutor had some "help" going over the content of Alex's phone. The feds must be so damn happy.

But to be fully clear and honest - it does appear that Alex perjured himself on the stand and the prosecutor make a strong case (even though technically using illicit material). I'm sure none of this was intentional on Alex's part and he was just like "take it and do what you need with it" to the lawyer (and think how many lawyers would be even willing to represent him!). I love Alex, but his character has flaws and one has to admit to it. Would still love to shake his hand one day.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
sad_clown2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yesterday court video looked like a low budget of a fake trial. Did Alex Jones actually hire his lawyer? Is Alex Jones actually bankrupt and that confused in all times he talks etc..?

1
no-longer-silent 1 point ago +2 / -1

Is this some 5d chess move by Jones?

0
deleted 0 points ago +4 / -4
3
MoreTorbaLessKushner 3 points ago +4 / -1

Everyone has been bribed.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
1
Pres_Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Showing everyone that you are screwed if you question the narrative no matter what.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +2 / -4
2
Pres_Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOL...everyone knows he did bad shit? I am not everyone. What bad shit exactly?? There is none.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Pres_Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

He always does that. I have watched him since 2005 or so. That doesn't mean shit. Try again.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Pres_Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just because you squirm doesnt mean you are a criminal moron. He always is hyper active, not sitting still. It is so hard replying to idiots. Edit: WHAT SHIT IS HE TRYING TO HIDE...you seem to have insider knowledge. Answer that first idiot.

-1
jctbg20 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Nobody told him to go on stand.. And if he was going to, don't lie

He probably has an argument to sue his lawyer for legal malpractice, but this is on Alex for lying

I don't think it's going to have any relevance to the current case though

-8
deleted -8 points ago +1 / -9
-18
Bobf -18 points ago +3 / -21

Maybe Alex Jones should've erred on the side of cautious fact finding, instead of going straight to his False Flag schtick to push herbal supplements.

He created his own misery, he gave his enemies all the rope they needed.

1
AmannamedRJ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah that'll show him to have a verbal opinion in a country with enshrined and protected freedom of speech. Next time. Just don't think ever. That way when the system tries to declare your free speech a crime you won't ever be convicted because you never said or thought anything.

you fucking sponge.

0
Bobf 0 points ago +2 / -2

What are you 6 years old.

"enshrined and protected" that's rich. Just get over the fact that your dopey hero fucked up.

1
Pres_Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

How exactly? What is the difference between Alex talking about a potential false flag compared to every Main Stream Media, Celeb, Prominent Performer, Past Presidents, Congressmen, Senators, etc. calling Trump a Nazi? Which is worse do you think? Your answer will clearly show how fucking moronic you are.

-1
Bobf -1 points ago +1 / -2

Calm down fangirl. Your hero decided to broadcast what he thought happened to the minor children of private citizens, for commercial profit, and opened himself up to incredible legal abuse.

All the people you mentioned are adult public figures talking about another adult public figure, which is the reason why no one gets in trouble.

Neither is acceptable in my view, but reality doesn't really give a fuck about my opinion, or yours. Take the L.

1
Pres_Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

No one cares what is acceptable in your view. He broadcasted a response to an event that looked very strange as it went on. He never even talked about the kids just the event. You obviously never saw what he was broadcasting at the time and are just a Alex Jones hating Faggot who has not idea what they are talking about. Even the way you put it is not illegal and not defaming. You are full of shit.

-1
Bobf -1 points ago +1 / -2

Would you be okay with some random telling you how your kid died, and that it was fake? Whether it was a false flag or not, is irrelevant. If you would stop PMSing like a leftist female, you would notice I said he opened himself up to lawfare. Whether AJ is actually guilty or innocent of any of this is also irrelevant. The process is the punishment. It's even worse for him that there's some activist cunt running the courtroom.

Out of all the dopey stuff he's ever said, this one thing exposed him legally to shyster lawyers. Being mad at me about it is just you throwing an adult tantrum.

1
Pres_Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is way more shit he has done to expose himself to shyster lawyers. You must of missed his 911 stuff, which is not surprising. Doesnt matter if I am OK or you are OK with what he said...he can say it no matter what. Go live in Communist China than. Also, he never said ANYTHING directly to ANYONE whether it was a parent or a kid. Your example is bullshit just like everything else you are trying to say or imply. Go Fuck Yourself Faggot.

1
FutureVRPilot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah what about the most secure election in history 🤔🤡🤣🤣

1
1
ChonkFingers 1 point ago +1 / -0

I watched both videos. He brings up a few good points that the kids were exploited by gun control propagandists but thats it. The rest is just “there’s mold on the school” or “they went on a field trip” useless information…

-3
Bobf -3 points ago +1 / -4

Not sure what your videos were supposed to illustrate. Alex Jones exposed himself to terminal lawfare. Please give me the timestamp in either video where that's covered.

1
TheTelltaleFly 1 point ago +2 / -1

We’ll say the same about you when they come for you.

-1
Bobf -1 points ago +2 / -3

If the time ever comes when all I do is DUPE gullible CHUMPS into buying worthless herbal supplements, you're welcome to.

0
pburgpait 0 points ago +2 / -2

Fag

-20
Uzkekistani -20 points ago +4 / -24

I didn't realize this was AlexJones.win. I love seeing that retard squirm and get talked down to, he's a trump traitor and a grifter faggot

7
Pres_Trump 7 points ago +7 / -0

Really...now I see the true meaning of your posts. You are biased as well. Go Fuck Yourself FAGGOT

0
Visceroth 0 points ago +1 / -1

Here's a joke:

What did the faggot say to the patriots?

I didn't realize this was AlexJones.win. I love seeing that retard squirm and get talked down to, he's a trump traitor and a grifter faggot

-4
Uzkekistani -4 points ago +1 / -5

Simp harder for lunatics and wonder why the conservative movement makes no progress

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imagine thinking anyone is going to fall for your mental illness.