1058
Comments (23)
sorted by:
16
Winston_Raleigh 16 points ago +17 / -1

If your system of government has contingencies for corruption on that scale, which do NOT include the key phrase, "HANG THEM ALL"; you're gonna have a bad time.

0
macocontentfarmer 0 points ago +1 / -1

came here to say that

4
FTR22 4 points ago +4 / -0

Actually, IF Trump somehow or some way gets back into office, he can constitutionally serve, I beleive, 2 years of this 4 year term and then run again in '24 and serve that term out too.

3
barwhack 3 points ago +3 / -0

He's gettin' old. One more. No dynasty. Desantis next.

Also: term limits should have only ONE provsion for fraud:

DEATH TO TRAITORS

3
Happicakes 3 points ago +4 / -1

If he is reelected in '24 like he should be, he can run again after that. Term limit resets when he is out of office. So here's hoping for a Trump presidency that lasts until 2032.

1
SteelyEyedTroglodyte [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

If this is the case, why wouldn't the democrat have put forth obama again instead of this current retard we are dealing with?

1
Happicakes 1 point ago +2 / -1

Probably because he doesn't want to be responsible for the current shitshow in progress. Also, Michelle's demands for pegging snu-snu are likely to keep him busy enough.

-1
ProTrumpPede -1 points ago +1 / -2

Well that’s not true at all.

3
Genji_Sama 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm pretty sure if fraud was proven to the masses that their new arguememt would be, "Trump was already elected to a second term, so even if he didn't get to serve because fraud, he can't be elected again."

3
Saluboy 3 points ago +4 / -1

???

If elected in 2024, Trump would be eligible for two consecutive terms.

2
BoughtByBloomberg2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Presidential term limits are bullshit anyway. It's the executive. If a dude is doing a great job he should keep being able to run for that office.

2
GarudaDarkblack 2 points ago +2 / -0

Technically he served one term and then was denied serving his other term which would make it a negative term. 1 + (-1) = 0. As far as I'm concerned, come January 21, 2023, Trump would have effectively served a net zero terms and is eligible to serve two more terms.

2
DeplorableBasketCase 2 points ago +2 / -0

Since Miley took control of the military from Trump. He technically has not even had 1 term as president yet.

1
STIDGIT64 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree

1
hoaxproof 1 point ago +1 / -0

or there should just be no term limits if the candidate had it stolen. Let the people force the candidate on the perpetrators for the rest of their (or his) life.

1
someschmuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe the loophole still exists since Trump only served a single term, and didn't serve a consecutive term, if he's reelected it's a new first term, so he can run for a second

1
Earthmover511 1 point ago +1 / -0

Absolutely

1
DigginDeeper 1 point ago +1 / -0

We should have the votes necessary to change Presidential term limits come 2024. Clinton talked about it, maybe we should get it done.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
BroadSunlitUplands 0 points ago +1 / -1

Easy fix for this: we change the definition of ‘twice’. There’s no reason ‘twice’ can’t mean three times. Language evolves.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
2
ironhorse 2 points ago +2 / -0

honestly we're already living under the dictatorship of the deep state.

1
FireCrotchPsaki 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah and I want it completely wiped out and a MAGA dictatorship instituted with the elimination of all liberals everywhere. Enough is enough