3083
Comments (193)
sorted by:
143
canadianhere 143 points ago +144 / -1

Unfortunately, they'll just point to this and say "See? Our policies worked!"

65
ConsrvspkgNJ 65 points ago +65 / -0

bingo

26
EvolutionIsFake 26 points ago +28 / -2

If you want to read articles from real scientists that call out the BS in plain to read ways of other climate change scientists and their articles & studies, check out this site. Search for "Climate Change" or other relevant topic. You will enjoy it:

10
DrBJTester 10 points ago +10 / -0

Thank you fren

Ideal for the holiday episodes of Crossfire at Thanksgiving with Commie liberal whackadoodles.

They will dismiss it as white supremacist propaganda or even worse a message from the patriarchy.

5
Iteachfuckingscience 5 points ago +5 / -0

HOW DARE YOU!

3
RobinNet 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Star_Commander 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bookmarked!

2
Cavetoad_1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup that's a fantastic sight and fun to dig around in.

26
PKC_MAN 26 points ago +26 / -0

They never said anything about the polar bears though. They just ignored it.

23
bubadmt 23 points ago +23 / -0

Coca Cola poached them all.

16
South_Florida_Guy 16 points ago +16 / -0

They wanted the world to be less white.

7
Some_Rando_Web_Dev 7 points ago +7 / -0

By the way, are you fags still buying Coke? I thought we were boycotting them! I still see Coke in stores!!

8
bubadmt 8 points ago +8 / -0

No I do crack now.

4
Meddlesom 4 points ago +4 / -0

That you, Hunter?

3
Some_Rando_Web_Dev 3 points ago +3 / -0

Way to get rid of the middle man!

5
South_Florida_Guy 5 points ago +5 / -0

Rarely get soda if we do it's usually sugar free Dr pepper or ginger ale

3
x79q3pb 3 points ago +3 / -0

Switch to RC, they aren't (yet) woke that I can find.

4
SPEDMan64 4 points ago +4 / -0

I made the RC switch.

I actually bring a large Yeti-style mug full of RC when I go out to eat fast food as well, since they usually offer Coke garbage.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Some_Rando_Web_Dev 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, we use RC or Pepsi.. Don't fucking tell me about pepsi ... They better not be woke yet.

1
South_Florida_Guy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dr pepper is their own brand only bottled by coke in some places but not owned by them and from what I recall seeing recently they're not woke either

Edit: scratch that they might be fags too, sigh....

3
Cesare_Borgia 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unsweetened iced tea is the way.

5
WhoMeTwo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Don't you be dissin' on my Sweet Tea.... Thems fightin' words!

4
Some_Rando_Web_Dev 4 points ago +4 / -0

The_South_Will_Rise_Ageen!.jpg has entered the chat

4
KickingPugilist 4 points ago +4 / -0

Flavored seltzer.

2
HeavyMetalPatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's how I dropped soda. Natural flavors in sparkling water. Zero calories and no worries about sugar or wokeness.

3
x79q3pb 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's really an acquired taste, I can't drink much of it unsweetened without at least a sprig of mint in the mix.

1
Aoikaze2000 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only time I ever drink any form of pop is when it's from one of the fridges in the office (because the company stocks those with soda). For whatever reason Mountain Dew still seems to work wonders at keeping me going when I need to work late on a project.

3
Aoikaze2000 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm surprised they don't start releasing black bears into the polar region to help mitigate the racial injustice caused by the hateful white bears.

1
DrBJTester 1 point ago +1 / -0

Those damn RACISTS are every forking where! REEEEEEEEEEEEEE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

-1
mareecopa -1 points ago +1 / -2

the deep state lies about its depth according to the golden rule - fake it till you make it

24
South_Florida_Guy 24 points ago +24 / -0

"Look outside. Whatever is happening proves we are right!" #settledscience

13
DrBJTester 13 points ago +13 / -0

But if you ask them to explain the scientific method to you like you're a third grader....

They can't.

It's hilarious

9
Hades440 9 points ago +9 / -0
  1. Form a conclusion - In this step, you use your feelings about what must be right because it feels good to form a belief so core to your being you can never be convinced otherwise.

 

  1. Find evidence to support your conclusion - In this step, you use the conclusion you've already settled on as truth to locate anyone or anything that will support that position. Any dissenting evidence is obviously biased and tainted and can be disregarded; if they weren't lying, they'd have supported your conclusion.

 

  1. Harass and assault anyone who doesn't blindly follow you - In this step, you attack people who don't listen to you, because as this belief is so critical to your very identity, not believing you is tantamount to physically attacking you and therefore retaliatory violence is fully justified.

 

Is that not the scientific method you learned in school?

3
DrBJTester 3 points ago +3 / -0

Outstanding comment 👍

No that's not exactly what I learned in Junior high KEK

2
Some_Rando_Web_Dev 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is perfect!

1
PartandParcel 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s basically the just of it. Good weather, bad weather, hot, cold, wet, dry, stormy, clear skies. That’s why they use the term “climate change”. Because it can literally mean ANYTHING.

14
Skogin 14 points ago +14 / -0

Billy Madison: “Ahh, no they did not.”

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
2
Madman2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

GREAT, GRAND, WONDERFUL...RESET

12
nozonozo 12 points ago +12 / -0

Gee, I wonder how the Great Barrier Reef survived the last Ice Age.

4
DrBJTester 4 points ago +4 / -0

And the one before that....

KEK

4
caKAG 4 points ago +4 / -0

How Dare You! You have Stolen my Dream, my fear mongering, with your truthful words. Now my Grift is over and I have to return to school to get my GED so I can work at a Swedish Coffee Shop.

Greta Thunberg, Probably

4
SemperFidelis231 4 points ago +4 / -0

It isn't actually that old. The Great Barrier Reef as a structure is only about 8000 years old, the last ice age technically ended 11,000 years ago.

1
WhoMeTwo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interdasting.....

1
Rob_Belmonte 1 point ago +1 / -0

Technically the Earth is still in a period of glacieration and the last ice age has not yet ended....

60
swift_water 60 points ago +60 / -0

There was a scientist who lost his job and everything for proving the reef can heal itself quite rapidly and isn't nearly as dead as climate weirdos were suggesting. This happens all the time.

42
deleted 42 points ago +42 / -0
12
DrBJTester 12 points ago +12 / -0

This is the way of the totalitarian leftist tyranny 1984 come to life.

6
LawNmowermaN 6 points ago +6 / -0

It would also help if the figure was "97% of scientists who tried to replicate the findings" and not just "97% of those we polled".

5
SPEDMan64 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's 99.9% of scientists who receive government funding.

5
Bullseyed 5 points ago +5 / -0

A scientist without government funding is called a "conspiracy theorist".

16
ultra-tera-maga 16 points ago +17 / -1

This happens all the time.

With every single leftist agenda. It's fraud all the way down.

8
Peashout 8 points ago +8 / -0

Imagine being fired from doing science, cause your blue haired coworker REEEEEEEEEd.

9
they-see-me-trollin 9 points ago +9 / -0

Australia's environmental minister even came out and debunked the climate doomsday cult bullshit. Australian marine biologists openly mock Americans who go to the GBR and think the sky is falling.

(1) the GBR has a major bleaching event roughly every 200 years. we just went through it, so we won't have another major bleaching event for another 200 years. we don't know what causes the cycle, but when they cored out some of that multi-thousand year old brain coral, you can see the rings of where it bleaches every 200 years.

(2) bleaching is when the coral turns white. it does not mean the coral is dead. bleaching means the algae that forms a symbiotic relationship with the coral has left the coral. depending on the species of coral, it can live anywhere from 4-36 months without algae, most around the 18-24 month mark. this is why bleached coral recovers seasonally.

(3) there are now multiple techniques in use that have been found to artificially cause massive reef growth. it sounds counterintuitive, but the number one technique is literally breaking the coral. it has to be replanted in a certain manner to not wash away, but the breakage areas grow MASSIVELY faster than anywhere else on the coral body. electrolyzing the material the coral is growing on also helps it grow much faster.

all the people bitching and whining are just doomsday cultists. their hysteria is anti-fact, anti-science, and they need to shut the fuck up.

7
BlitheringIdiot 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's what you get for daring to disagree with "settled science". 99% of scientists tend to agree with the thing that keeps them employed writing more useless papers.

32
bidensniffingkids 32 points ago +32 / -0

Are you telling me that things in the natural world like climate, fires and plant growth are cyclical????

10
Bullseyed 10 points ago +10 / -0

Next you're going to say that our planet moves in some kind of circular or elliptical orbit with regular cycles.

5
DrBJTester 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes.

21
CMDRConanAAnderson 21 points ago +21 / -0

My worry is we're doing too much too fast to lower carbon emissions. Global cooling is a threat we could be moving toward very fast, consider that the ecosystem adapted to the industrialization of humanity for nearly a century; now all of a sudden all that carbon has been sucked out of the system. I don't know what that means but even an idiot could conclude that there's now an imbalance in the ecosystem's expectations vs reality. This is one of the things you just don't play around with, no one can find out what will occur, until it's plainly obvious that is. If you believe the ecosystem is capable of adaptation then it should scare you that it could be in a placed in a position where it believe there's a crisis going on in our environment.

Add 1 flaming computer programmer faggot trying to block out the sun and you might even believe that's their next move.

22
Pepper2 22 points ago +23 / -1

Global cooling is a way scarier proposition. A few degrees lower averages will shorten crop growing windows significantly and cause major ice build up on latitudes above 40

15
Cesare_Borgia 15 points ago +15 / -0

During the last ice age something like 20,000 years ago there was an ice sheet miles thick as far south as Missouri. There was sea ice off the coast of Florida.

We can adapt to a few degrees of warming quite easily if indeed that's happening. We're completely powerless in the face of another ice age.

5
AerialRush 5 points ago +5 / -0

Since we’re still leaving the last ice age. By the time the next one comes around we’ll have even better tech if the political landscape is fixed. Artificial greenhouses and underground cities can help deal with this.

1
Pepper2 1 point ago +2 / -1

Exactly. The laurentide ice sheet, right? That's how the great lakes were formed, pretty cool. Seattle was under a mile of ice as well.

15
_Sully_ 15 points ago +15 / -0

The example I like to think of is the White Cliffs of Dover. The White Cliffs of Dover are what the Earth does to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. Trillions upon trillions of dead bodies mound up to create an entire landmass which at one point was a gas released by volcanoes. This happened because the Earth has an enormous amount of CO2 in the atmosphere which in turn drive a process to stabilize an imbalance. Another example is Banded Iron formations. Over a billion years ago the Earth's atmosphere has almost no Oxygen in it. The oceans also were so loaded with iron that the water was literally green. A life form showed up and started producing a oxygen, a pollution at the time. Well as the atmosphere gain more and more O2 it started to oxidize the iron in the water. This process gradually removed the bulk of the iron in the ocean and made it far more livable for multicellular life. If there were environmentalists around at that time they'd certainly force the world's governments to stop the scourge that was oxygen pollution. And that's the crux of the issue, people are so hellbent on preserving a system that was never static.

8
IronMaiden 8 points ago +8 / -0

Very well said! Also, when oxygen was first produced by an organism, it was toxic to most of the life that came before it, causing mass extinctions. This, however, paved the way for the much more efficent organisms who use oxygen in respiration.

4
anishr 4 points ago +4 / -0

That is incredibly articulate. But one criticism: how do you know that a billion years ago the earth’s atmosphere had no oxygen?

3
_Sully_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

I believe it’s a theory based on the presence of banded iron and stratigraphically younger formations with life in them.

3
akira2501 3 points ago +3 / -0

My worry is we're doing too much too fast to lower carbon emissions.

Why? You can create carbon emissions with a spark. It's not a difficult material to "bootstrap" into the atmosphere. Want some carbon? Light an oil well on fire.

Global cooling is a threat we could be moving toward very fast,

I don't believe that we have the capability of having this large of an impact on the environment. In environmental terms "very fast" is like 100 years. You're just taking their broken narrative and running it in reverse.

This is one of the things you just don't play around with

Thankfully we're not nearly as powerful or impactful as we pretend to be.

If you believe the ecosystem is capable of adaptation then it should scare you that it could be in a placed in a position where it believe there's a crisis going on in our environment.

Adaptation is driven by local minimums, not by "belief."

Add 1 flaming computer programmer faggot trying to block out the sun and you might even believe that's their next move.

It would take 100s of rockets. Literally the easiest thing to disrupt.

1
AVeryNakedMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

CO2 emissions don't cause global warming. It's all a lie. The US is colder today than in the 1930's, but the leftist activists in charge of the temperature data literally just add degrees to it and claim that warming is happening.

1
Ivleeeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

We aren't. Though the idea of eliminating co2 from the atmosphere is absurd, we are still adding it.

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
2
ultra-tera-maga 2 points ago +3 / -1

Just gotta notch them up over 100% and the reef will be fully recovered!

1
DrBJTester 1 point ago +1 / -0

Private property is probably causing global warming/climate change and as soon as we eliminate privately owned property will be making some real headway.

The corrupt ruling class

12
BarneyFranksNipples 12 points ago +12 / -0

How Science Should Work: “Let me use the scientific method to observe this event over a long period of testing to determine what might be happening and why”

How Science Works in Modern Day: “My study is being funded by a bias source who wants me to take a preexisting conclusion and work backwards to say why that conclusion is correct, as quickly as possible. Usually that means not following the scientific method. Oftentimes that means just making shit up”

7
PraiseBeToScience 7 points ago +9 / -2

You can shorten that by saying: "Science then: 'I wonder if the Earth is heating up.' and Science now: 'I know the Earth is heating up and I need to prove it!'"

2
stratocaster_patriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

And once I prove it I'm know we'll find out you are responsible for it.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
13
SBOJ_JOBS 13 points ago +13 / -0

Fixable local man-made non-climate issues are almost always the biggest problems for nature. Things like acid rain (largely fixed), chemical runoff (improved once detected and understood) and divers wearing toxic sunscreen and touching sensitive corals (partially fixed through increased awareness).

9
WarViper1337 9 points ago +9 / -0

The great barrier (as well as almost all coral reefs) go through natural cycles of dying off and regrowth with changing conditions. The climate activist just point out a single part of the cycle and omit everything else.

4
SPEDMan64 4 points ago +4 / -0

Most activists don't actually know shit about the science they are so fanatical about.

Like my wife claiming to be the Grateful Dead's biggest fan but can only name Jerry Garcia and Pigpen as members and only one song title.

9
GabeC1997 9 points ago +9 / -0

Huh, must be all that nitrogen.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
7
SPEDMan64 7 points ago +7 / -0

I ran a sim with my students yesterday. We simulated an increase of water temp from 80.6 F to 91.4 F and advanced it 20 years. We looked at four organisms: Staghorn coral, boulder star coral, sponges, and algae. The Staghorn dropped its population down to about 30%, but Staghorn is notoriously fragile to begin with; hurricanes usually tear it up pretty good. The others declined a bit but the algae actually increased in population with the extra heat.

So even after twenty years of 91 F water temp there was still coral remaining, but my associates still want to toe the climate crisis line whereas I try to focus on the actual danger which is pollution. I am more concerned with having clean water to drink than I am with continuing to enjoy my already hot Georgia summers.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
AerialRush 2 points ago +2 / -0

This was very informative. Thank you

7
Kiss_The_Ring 7 points ago +9 / -2

I've still got all 2,000 space heaters I ordered back in the 70's for the coming ice age.

3
DrBJTester 3 points ago +3 / -0

They make excellent trebuchet missiles the oil ones you can fill up with napalm and light them before firing.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
BabbleRabble 5 points ago +5 / -0

Just because the boogie man isn't under your bed at this moment doesnt prove that he isn't real.... give me my Boogie Man Protection Money.... NOW!

4
brutustyberius 4 points ago +4 / -0

How Dare You!

3
henri_derelicte 3 points ago +3 / -0

These emissions reduction schemes are a scam. To the extent emissions reflect industrial capacity, the US needs to retain as much capacity as possible in the event we are in a major war. China realizes this, and is using muh emissions per capita as an excuse to effective deindustrialize the US to their benefit.

2
Pres_Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Leftist morons: "See, its working"

2
VoteRepublicanAgain 2 points ago +2 / -0

"How dare you?!"

2
freebirdie 2 points ago +2 / -0

Considering it was sunscreen, not fictitious climate nonsense that was killing the reef, and once they banned the sunscreens responsible, the reef has come back thriving, I doubt we will ever hear another peep about it.

1
Bogey 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup. It was mostly due to incidental exposure to toxins that weren't accounted for. Once folks realized sunscreen was toxic to the coral reef, how to handle it better, and better manage the coral— the problem was effectively solved.

2
murphda 2 points ago +2 / -0

How much does a buffoon make??

2
MythArcana 2 points ago +2 / -0

Must be all the high taxes that did it! We did it, Klaus!

2
TheAttackTitan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh by the way, ask the environmentaloids about the hole in the ozone layer

No spoilers, but the leftist elites claimed it would take thousands of years to repair itself and it only took like 15 years.

2
tholinz 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t think anybody can deny that human activity has an impact on the oceans. But this insane politicized apocalypse bullshit doesn’t help anything. I think we’d be in a much better position to address these problems if we dealt with them directly, on their own terms, and stopped making it about shaming Western people into hating themselves.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
use40trackmode 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've been listening to the media prophesy this specific apocalypse (Greenhouse Effect became Global Warming became Climate Change) since the late 1980s, when The Cure and REM were on the radio and I was a child. I'm now a father in early middle age.

None of their predictions have come true. At least half the world wouldn't care about such a future-oriented problem as this this anyway, real or not; and the half that would care about such a far-off problem is evenly divided between quasi-religious climate zealots and heretical unbelievers.

How long does this continue, and how does it end?

1
Bubblegumbro 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sad thing is when their predictions don’t come true. Then they claim that their efforts are the cause for the improvements.

1
FamburgerHelper 1 point ago +1 / -0

HOW DARE YOU?!!

1
Dsnlb02 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nobody listens to this sock puppet. Her parents should have been arrested for child abuse.

1
PartandParcel 1 point ago +1 / -0

Climate change is real. I’m my state we call it seasons. Climate change according to the left is a giant hoax to corral voters, a wedge issue if you will. It’s a single issue which keeps the demoKKKrat sheep inside the demoKKKrat and globohomo vote farm. 200 years from now they will be pushing these same tired fear porn titles for simply shifting weather. And each brainwashed sheep will gobble it up. It’s a fucking hoax.

1
ThaDtothaOtothaN 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its almost like and I know this is crazy the Earth is always changing and has its own ups and downs.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
coinneach007 1 point ago +1 / -0

Climate change nuts: Hey we told you the hour and minute it is too late, not the year!

1
that_guy_pming_tits 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thats likely because preservation efforts are working. Not anything to do with global warming though.

1
DemonicSoap 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is great! I love the ocean and deeply care about the fish. So glad I, and I alone, reversed global warming!

1
Meddlesom 1 point ago +1 / -0

It set that record last year too... two years of mega growth.

1
Thejayj 1 point ago +1 / -0

The polar caps have increased in size as well

1
Trouble07 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am still waiting for acid rain from the 80s!

1
Krat 1 point ago +1 / -0

They will say its because of the changes we made like.banning plastic straws and bags

1
the_dave 1 point ago +1 / -0

Great Barrier Reef Doing Great. Here's Why That's Bad News. /CNN, probably

1
MondayCoupleIsDead 1 point ago +1 / -0

And here's title of The Washington Post's article about it. Very predictable but i'm shocked they went back to using global warming.

"Great Barrier Reef coral bounces back, but global warming still a risk"

1
PMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

So much of the populace has no idea what is going on, a couple of years ago there was some article about how the great barrier reef was "officially dead" and a girl I know posted a picture of herself at the reef with a caption along the lines of "Im so glad I was able to see the great barrier reef when I could, sharing this picture so that those who didn't get that opportunity may see the true beauty of nature. Humans can ruin such incredible things." I messaged her and said "you know the great barrier reef is still there, right?" and included links to websites offering tours of the reef. She had some bogus reply along the lines of "well, awareness is what matters right now."

1
WashingtonPede 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought the reef caught covid and died thrice.

1
Canadiapede7 1 point ago +1 / -0

These are the same people who think the Arctic is supposed to be frozen year round and that the reason its minimum summer ice is getting smaller each year is because of humans despite the fact that the Arctic has been melting at an increasing rate since the end of the last ice age. The only reason we were able to even explore the arctic is because it was already almost completely melted during summer season 400 years ago. The Arctic freezes incredibly fast after summer season ends in September , gaining 3 million Km of ice by March the next year only to then lose most of it again a few months later.

1
DJT_JR6544 1 point ago +1 / -0

Greta Von Doomsberg!

1
conservativefrank 1 point ago +1 / -0

HOW DARE YOU!

1
WeAreGonnaWin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Earth spinning. Sun shining. Volcanoes erupting. Meteorites hitting. Earth tilting. Oceans flowing.

1
Pederella 1 point ago +1 / -0

Polar bear population has entered the chat

1
Ivleeeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

I tried and tried to tell people that this was a bs story (along with all of the ocean acidification garbage) when it was hot in 2014-15. But people love fear porn. Coral are very hardy in the ocean. How else have they survived so many extra hot periods and ice ages?

1
Smarmcastic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Coral is Asshoe!!

1
HaitchElGee 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's all such a load of bullshit, wrong time and time again, and yet so many people still fall for it.

1
Tralfaz 1 point ago +1 / -0

But, it's white coral!