1685
Comments (143)
sorted by:
54
BasedRetard 54 points ago +55 / -1

Chuck Woolery is based? Holy balls.

32
slangin_paint 32 points ago +32 / -0

Very

3
JuliusEvola 3 points ago +4 / -1

Unconquerably based.

If this keeps up, we have a real fighting chance.

May it spread like fire from the divine Father

8
NormalCitizen 8 points ago +8 / -0

Lol... came to say the same

5
Scot 5 points ago +5 / -0

[Insert always has been meme here]

1
deleted 1 point ago +7 / -6
3
BunnyPicnic 3 points ago +3 / -0

Does it really matter why he did it? The German people were being bombarded with over sexualized shit, hyperinflation. They'll tell you about the Nazis burning books. But they won't tell you what books they burned. You should look up which books they burnt, it tells you on the Holocaust main website.

23
HahahahaThree 23 points ago +23 / -0

Who denies critical race theory is a communist ideology? Do people think we believe it's part of conservative ideology?

16
KeepingAmericaGreat 16 points ago +16 / -0

Unsure about that but many Leftists claim it's only taught in graduate schools and not to children, which is a complete lie.

6
BoomerBob2024 6 points ago +10 / -4

It’s a jewish creation, just like communism and it’s why my grandkids are mixed

6
they-see-me-trollin 6 points ago +6 / -0

not just any jewish creation...

communist genocide was by bolshevik jews. the critical theory jews at frankfurt only talk down communist genocide because "not muh real communism". they want the same authoritarian control, just mad that they were driven out of germany, and didn't get power when the bolsheviks did.

3
Cozette 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jewish is a term thats both too broad and too narrow to be helpful as anything more than a rest stop for a truth seeker.. Using this term for too long, in Homeric terms, means failing the Land of the Lotus Eaters test.

2
BoomerBob2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s described as hyperbole, you could say the same thing about black lives matter which is also a jewish creation. The jews are very deceptive in their quest for control.

1
JuliusEvola 1 point ago +2 / -1

"Yo grandpa gimme $5 my nigga mayne sheeit."

-1
deleted -1 points ago +4 / -5
2
Cozette 2 points ago +2 / -0

Rehabbing Hitler.

Non linear musings:

NWO.

Does the N in NWO only stand for New?

Remember they always project and they obsess about dog whistles ie secret meanings.

What else does the N in NWO stand for; its "dog whistle" meaning; the secret meaning, that those in the know understand?

Who did they accuse Trump of emulating and what ideology did they claim he was seeking to impose on America? More projection?

What was Operation Paperclip and which agency ran the program?

Who first used the term New World Order? Which agency had he headed before becoming VPOTUS then POTUS?

Which agency started training and continued to train Ukraine's Azov Battalion at the end of WW2?

Which country do they hate more than any other?

Sum of All Fears. Nessum Dorma. A Trump favorite.

2
MickHigan2 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

,,,and the Bolshevik Jews did nothing. They just sat back and didn't launch massive campaigns of attrition to the regions Orthodox Catholics and Christians...

But yeah... that darned Literally Hitler.

-2
Ez_mac -2 points ago +8 / -10

No one. This dipshit is conflating this as an endorsement that Hitler did the right thing.

11
Northernrebel 11 points ago +19 / -8

He did though

0
Cozette 0 points ago +2 / -2

"He did though".

If you are siding with the NWO Death Cult, yes, he did "do the right thing".

The best and brightest young men killed. Beta subservience elevated. Masculinity derided. The word nationalist made toxic. Extreme censorship justified. Globalist Institutions created to ensure world order and protection from even minor criticism provided......

1
RootinTootin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Whatever good points there might have been to his national socialism, they are forever tainted now. Much like how in the US "state's rights" were linked to slavery since the Civil War. It seems like the later has changed recently, but NatSoc is nowhere close to that

-11
RootinTootin -11 points ago +5 / -16

He lost and Israel is now a Jewish state. Cope and seethe

8
deleted 8 points ago +13 / -5
3
MelGibson2 3 points ago +6 / -3

Not chosen. Not smart. Neurotic from centuries of inbreeding.

2
Win_or_Die 2 points ago +2 / -0

And that religion of murderous, genocidal, poisoning evil.

1
MelGibson2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Synagogue of Satan

-6
RootinTootin -6 points ago +4 / -10

Ah the haavara agreement. I learn something new everyday trolling you stormfags. But i guess it figures that the leader's fanboys would know more about it than most.

He still lost though...so once again cope and seethe

8
MelGibson2 8 points ago +9 / -1

You couldn't troll a 5 year old, Shlomo lmfao

-4
RootinTootin -4 points ago +3 / -7

5 year olds? Please stay on topic.

It was Mohammed who was obsessed with the prepubescient butthole. Your hero like those of men his own age... as I hear you do as well

1
MickHigan2 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imagine thinking Hitler lost when his ideals have survived for decades. What a cuckin' chode.

1
RootinTootin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Haha cope and seethe. A Christ your Hitler is not. Just another antichrist who met judgement

2
Burn-them-all 2 points ago +3 / -1

which mind you is heretical to Jewish faith if followed properly. temple -> messiah -> Israel. cope and seethe. not only did they kill the messiah they also continue to blaspheme themselves.

1
RootinTootin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Instructions unclear. What am I to seethe about? We already established I was wrong and Hitler wanted a Jewish state. Are we supposed to hate him for that?

2
Burn-them-all 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was unaware we had reached that point of mental gymnastics. I find that people are often unaware of the order by which Israel was to be created. far more ignorant of the fact they are not gods chosen after the sacrifice Jesus made for all of mankind. thus forming a new covenant with man that we are all welcomed to be in his presence as long as we accept him into our hearts. doing so is more than simply saying so it is to live by that example to the absolute best of ones ability. you must not only strive to be good but also combat evil.

Hitler also had a profound love for Islam as he viewed it as a strong religion. the issues I have with him are many but the truth of it is after cleaning out Weimar Germany he should have passed the baton to someone with cleaner hands. stare too long into the abyss (and that man did a fair amount of staring) and you eventually become it. This in my opinion is a critical failing of many revolutions and uprisings. those with the most blood on their hands tend to hold onto power like a lifeline. I suppose Frank Herbert wrote it best "all rebels are closet aristocrats."

now to explain the earlier statement and expand upon where other people have failed to express in their rabid ignorance. --

the creation of Israel was wrong. its very foundations are heretical. this is a fact and something that i have had more than my fair share of beef with people over because its a mockery of the very same texts that claim its relevance.

Nazi Germany was also wrong on many levels. Most of them born of Hitlers own personal failures and vision.

Making a single caste the devil is bound to fail no matter the tribe. Even when many of the demons you clear out happen to be of that same group you cannot take a human and do that with confidence.

Nothing compares to animal and child sex brothels and rampant drug use while trannies walk your streets. I'd commit an atrocity too under those conditions. 100% of the time. and with far less successful finesse.

That's why people have to be very aware of their own inner demons and find when its time to relinquish power. Hitler fundamentally did not trust anyone else to prevent a relapse and failed due to it. He didn't trust his own generals. He didn't trust his advisors. He didn't trust a soul beyond himself and fell to a Narcissist vision coupled with the occult.

His successes could have been longer lived had he not had a paranoid schizophrenic breakdown in regards to the evils he had managed to quell. that's a fact. a unified nigh homogenous country regaining its moral center on the verge of a golden age (evidenced by the multitude of technological breakthroughs from a previously impoverished people) and he threw it away due to the aforementioned lack of trust paranoia and fear.

Hitler fucked up in big ways. Jews were involved deeply in Weimar and Bolshevik Russia. but to say "all group bad" is never a long term winning strategy. much like fascism is excellent in short bursts but is incapable of long lived existence.

the reasons behind why are as important as the information of when and how.

Why is the introspective looks that allows us to broaden our search for the how and when.

Because there's that closet aristocrat in every one of us. that man that says I could do better if I just held the reigns. and he has to be controlled and more importantly discarded when necessary to ensure lasting peace and prosperity should you find yourself holding the reigns.

1
RootinTootin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know it's 2 days late, but I totally agree with you. I've always felt that if given a binary choice between nazism and communism I'd go with the nazis every time. Of course it sucks if you're in the out group (jews) in a european nationalist society, but It's so obvious where the greater evil lies between that and the bolsheviks. And with that said , it's too bad the nazis couldn't do more damage to the ussr.

Genuinely curious about state of Israel being heretical. I've always considered it as a prophecy being fulfilled. Is it because of the new covenant, that the promises made towards Isreal now apply to Christ's children, his church? So this prophecy should rightful be seen as being applicable to the Christian Church, and anything else is a form of antichrist teaching? I've never really considered that view.

1
MelGibson2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hitler wanted to send the jews to Madagascar. Spend some of your JIDF shekels on education.

8
SDsc0rch 8 points ago +9 / -1

who is the greatest killer of leftists on the planet?? OTHER LEFTISTS ---- leftists have killed more leftists than any other group on earth ---- so it surprises no one that one leftist (hitler) persecuted other leftists (yes, these franfort school a-holes - but also bolsheviks in russia) ---- ps... hitler rise is partly a reaction to the weimar movement - in germany, weimar was the home to leftists (gays, creatives, "liberals" of the day) and compared to THEM, hitler was "right wing"

0
deleted 0 points ago +5 / -5
2
Cozette 2 points ago +3 / -1

Hilter "hated communism".

Competing gangs fighting over the same terf usually hate each other. Their hatred is not necessarily proof of virtue.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
RootinTootin 1 point ago +1 / -0

"capitalists"

Nobody on here describes themselves that way, let alone MAGA peeps. That's Marxist leftist lingo. You nazi larpers are fucking awful at it, probably couldn't hack it on 4chan that's why you're here. Pathetic

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
16
RootinTootin 16 points ago +22 / -6

This is like the joozillionth time this has been posted today

27
BesiegedHonkler 27 points ago +28 / -1

I think you mean 600 gorillion

12
Syme84 12 points ago +15 / -3

Stop posting this (((stuff)))!

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
6
Vox_Dobad 6 points ago +7 / -1

Shapiro's sister, I'm guessing

-13
ezekielBulver -13 points ago +5 / -18

the weirdos are trying so hard to push the connection. These retards probably think every rectangle is a square.

8
PleaseFaceWall 8 points ago +11 / -3

You're not even a real joo

-9
ezekielBulver -9 points ago +2 / -11

lol all the (((retards))) have never read a book and think my name is jewish and not a fictional character by C.S. Lewis which details the exact behavior they engage in. It's peak irony.

5
deleted 5 points ago +8 / -3
-5
ezekielBulver -5 points ago +2 / -7

Lol found a ghost hunter

-9
RootinTootin -9 points ago +4 / -13

You're not even a real nazi.

The larping here is so pathetic. Goebbels would be ashamed

6
PleaseFaceWall 6 points ago +8 / -2

Theodor Herzl would be ashamed at how slow it's taking you guys to take down such a demoralized country. What's taking you so long anyway?

-8
RootinTootin -8 points ago +3 / -11

Herzl got his jewish state. Goebells killed his own. Too bad so sad, better luck next time loser

12
PleaseFaceWall 12 points ago +13 / -1

yet somehow Goeballs lives the jewish dream, in your head, rent free...why are you like this?

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
-8
RootinTootin -8 points ago +3 / -11

Jesus Christ I'm going to need copious amounts of alcohol like Hitler needed meth if I'm to continue this convo. Sadly I'm out of both.

Congratulations reichsfag, have a good night.

6
MelGibson2 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hi JIDF

-3
RootinTootin -3 points ago +2 / -5

Yeah, I just mock and deride

This is the way

12
WuFluHoax 12 points ago +15 / -3

So Hitler was fighting the same faggots we are currently dealing with? Interesting

4
Tusk 4 points ago +7 / -3

Why do you think they call you a nazi?

3
WuFluHoax 3 points ago +4 / -1

Well I THOUGHT they call me a Nazi because racism is the only sin they know, so they call anyone that disagrees with them some slur that amounts to "you have race based issues". And I THOUGHT that Hitler was a nasty eugenicist that wanted to create a super-race of humans by killing those who had "inferior genes" which was based on some racist stupidity. I also thought that I'm basically a libertarian where the government can fuck off in 98% of circumstances.

But now I'm not so sure. I see them trying to corrupt everything that made this country great, and to invert Christ in all they do.

4
CorruptAdamShiff 4 points ago +5 / -1

This is just a continuation of the Bolshevik revolution

Ww2truth.com

2
plaaaa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Enemies often hate each other aka their competition to own you.

5
Victimhood1 5 points ago +11 / -6

Well, Hitler isn't around to save us a second time

5
Mike_Echo 5 points ago +6 / -1

Andrew Breitbart's book, "righteous indignation" devotes a large chunk of the book to this fact. He then goes on to praise "rules for radicals" by Saul Alinsky. He's spot on about all of it. If the left followed all of the rules, we'd be a full on commie shit hole by now.

5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
3
Barbs 3 points ago +3 / -0

Marxists.

Yet I'm sure you interpreted that differently, because you wanted to. I bet if you asked him if that's what he meant he'd say "no."

-1
BoomerBob2024 -1 points ago +5 / -6

Karl Marx was a jew, communalism was created and is promoted by jews. It’s why my GRANDKIDS are mixed in this rotten country

2
HotPropGun 2 points ago +3 / -1

"We'll be back in two and two"...kek

2
MelGibson2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Based Chuck Woolery naming them.

2
JustInTime2_ 2 points ago +6 / -4

It is the truth.

2
MarvintheRobot 2 points ago +3 / -1

Ever wonder what books the Nazis were burning?

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
Yawnz13 2 points ago +9 / -7

What he fails to mention is that Hitler only "cracked down on them" because he wanted to install his own version. Nothing hates a socialist more than another socialist.

3
deleted 3 points ago +6 / -3
2
Yawnz13 2 points ago +2 / -0

Communism is a form of socialism.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Yawnz13 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except it isn't.

Socialism revolves around the abolition of private property.

2
WildRanter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Socialism is just a pleonasm to communism that came up after Nikita Kroutchev admitted to the world the crimes against humanity committed by Stalin.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
WildRanter 1 point ago +1 / -0

In practice it has always been the other way around. They're Jedi mind tricking zombies.

1
Cozette 1 point ago +1 / -0

Marxists. Nazis. Two wings on the same Totalitarian bird.

Both Death Cult sects.

Action. Reaction. Destruction. Build Back Better. Better for whom?

Death Cultists smile and sing "Heil Hegel".

2
borntacticool 2 points ago +3 / -1

https://archive.org/details/LibertyV09N2819320709/page/n3/mode/2up?view=theater

“ Why,” I asked Hitler, “ do you call yourself a National Socialist, since your party program is the very antithesis of that commonly accredited to Socialism?” “ Socialism,” he retorted, putting down his cup of tea, pugnaciously, “ is the science of dealing with the common weal. Communism is not Socialism. Marxism is not Socialism. The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning. I shall take Socialism away from the Socialists. “Socialism is an ancient Aryan, Germanic institution. Our German ancestors held certain lands in common. They cultivated the idea of the common weal. Marxism has no right to disguise itself as Socialism. Socialism, unlike Marxism, does not repudiate private property. Unlike Marxism, it involves no negation of personality, and unlike Marxism, it is patriotic. “We might have called ourselves the Liberal Party. We chose to call ourselves the National Socialists. We are not internationalists. Our Socialism is national. We demand the fulfillment of the just claims of the productive classes by the State on the basis of race solidarity. To us State and race are one.”

It would seem to me the only "redistribution of wealth" he's referring to is the redistribution of wealth from non-Germans, whom he identified as anti-German internationalists (particularly but not always in reference to Jews who owned "all of the factories and all of the shares" and ran the newspapers as well as judeo-bolshevists), to German workers.

1
Yawnz13 1 point ago +1 / -0

It would seem like you're ignoring quite a bit of information.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCkyWBPaTC8&t=2s

1
borntacticool 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not ignoring anything, I was responding directly to your two sentence comment. And I don't see anything in this video so far that contradicts what I said... but I would argue that it's highly inappropriate to argue by slamming people with a 5 hour video instead of responding yourself.

Let's say it was full on socialism as you claim... Looking at the tax rate, looking at the system of trade, the economy. I don't see where the economic malaise comes from - the Federal Government's control of the economy is worse in every regard certainly today and arguably was then as well.

In 1942 The USA's top marginal tax rate, for example, was 88%.

In England it was 98%.

In France it was 70%.

In "socialist" Germany it was 60%.

In "liberated" Germany it immediately went to 90%. That looks like expropriation to me.

1
Yawnz13 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would we only be looking at the tax rate?

Why is it "highly inappropriate" to link a video that backs up my claim? Considering you haven't provided a single bit of evidence refuting me, I'd say you only consider it "highly inappropriate" because it contains substantially more material in my favor than you've provided in your favor.

1
borntacticool 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd accept it as a source if you actually went to the trouble of pointing out in a five hour video where any of my arguments were contradicted by annotation or giving me time periods... but when you just lazily dump it on me like that it's a sign that you're not operating in good faith and just want me to waste five hours of my time and find there's nothing in there responsive to anything I said.

That's not a serious debate, it's a troll tactic. I think you'd understand that if I linked you a 100,000 page book and said "you're wrong, proof is somewhere in there".

1
Yawnz13 1 point ago +1 / -0

Whether you "accept it as a source" or not is wholly irrelevant.

lazily dump it on me

No one's forcing you to watch it, so you're complaints about it are entirely you're problem.

It's only a troll tactic to feckless cunts who lack the necessary attention span and/or mental acuity. Good to see you get your debate tactics from modern MSM. "Anything that requires more than a Twitter reponse's worth of explanation is trolling".

Of course, I know for certain that you've only looked at the total length of the video, as the video does indeed have timestamps in the time bar breaking it down by section topic as well as in the video description. The description also contains a full list of citations that provide the material for the video as well as a PDF breaking down the video in text. All of those things have been present on this video for at least the past year.

So cry and project more about me being "lazy" while you are apparently unwilling to even click on a drop-down icon.

1
borntacticool 1 point ago +1 / -0

An example of how to do it properly is exactly how I did it. I sent you a link to a magazine from the time period, the link took you directly to the article and pasted the quotes from the man himself where he proffered his take on socialism which does not resemble any other form of socialism. That's what not being lazy looks like.

To me his form of "socialism" looks more like a Nash equilibrium. If there is a continuum between capitalism and socialism, it would look to me like this:

Capitalism: "you have individual rights to act economically in your own interests, even if doing so has negative effects on society" (ex. selling a large American business to China)

Socialism: "you have no exclusive property rights and your economic activity is subject to the majority through the state". (ex. everything is socialized and you cannot own a business, it is owned by everyone)

National socialism appears to be "yes, you have rights but where there is an outcome that will benefit both yourself and society at the same time, that outcome should be chosen". (you can sell your oil refinery to other Americans, you can't sell it to China)

1
borntacticool 1 point ago +1 / -0

As for the tax rate, it's indicative that this variant of "socialism", as you call it, is in many ways arguably better than what we have already. So the point I'm trying to make is there is a lot of alarmism over 1930s-40's Germany that is only potentially alarming if you place yourself in that time period.

But look at the modern USA, there's just no comparison. Our taxes are higher, regulations far more onerous, businesses more controlled and corporate interests far more controlling than anything the National Socialists could have dreamed of.

And we're not even talking about the sociopolitical impacts or authoritarianism (consider the modern US spy apparatus), just the economic ones.

EDIT In short, if we were to transition to the forms of 1940's Germany, they would be considered "free market reforms" by modern standards - just goes to show how much the frog has been boiled already.

1
Yawnz13 1 point ago +1 / -0

As for the tax rate

A tax rate that you have yet to provide evidence for. But again, you seem to only be willing to look at the tax rate and no other factor. Technically speaking, if you look at Marx's theories, "true socialism"/"true Communism" can't possibly have taxes at all, because no property will exist in order to be taxed nor will any organization exist by which said taxes can be rightly collected. That would violate Communism's stance against hierarchical structures and monetary concepts.

1
borntacticool 1 point ago +1 / -0

A tax rate that you have yet to provide evidence for.

http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/capitalisback/CountryData/Germany/Other/Pre1950Series/RefsHistoricalGermanAccounts/Lindholm47.pdf

Check out page 123.

The taxes collected from the German people in 1942 were a smaller percentage of the national income than ever became the case in either Great Britain or the United States. The portion of national income collected in taxes in Germany at the beginning of hostilities was roughly equal to the highest point reached by the United States.

Page 124 details the total receipts in billions of marks and even though you cannot see it as a percentage, you can see that the corporate tax was essentially equivalent in the amount of revenue it brought to a combination of sin taxes. What's the USA's corporate tax rate today? Property taxes were a fraction of even sin taxes.

As I read through the whole document I see nothing in there that is surprising for a mixed economy. I see a recovering country that ends up in a war while other similarly situated countries fighting against it adopt similar policies. If you want to talk about "socialism", there is perhaps no more socialist force than a sustained war. America embraced socialistic polices under WW1 and WW2, nationalized entire industries, raised taxes to finance its largess and then when the war ended either never ceded economic territory back to the People or did so very slowly.

Where's this "socialism" you speak of that is markedly different from everyone else?

-2
Tusk -2 points ago +4 / -6

Why do you faggots insist on perpetuating the leftist narrative that Hitler was the ultimate baddie?

2
Yawnz13 2 points ago +3 / -1

Why do you faggots insist on perpetuating the leftist narrative that Hitler wasn't a socialist?

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
1
Cozette 1 point ago +1 / -0

Getting rid of the Central Bank does NOT require embracing any iteration of totalutarianism, including the iteration nostalgic naives link to mustache man.

1
Cozette 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do you have a hypoglycemic over reaction by pretending that moustache man "was the ultimate" goodie rather than just another one of history's cautionary tales?

2
AnonymousShitPoster 2 points ago +7 / -5

funny he didn’t mention how they were all jews

fuck your downvotes - its the truth motherfuckers.

1
Cozette 1 point ago +1 / -0

"All jews".

As relevant as any other individuality erasing bogey man.

All men. All whites. All white men.

1
AnonymousShitPoster 1 point ago +1 / -0

frankfurt school marxists were literally all jews faggot. this isnt like saying “all of one race is bad” - in the case of the frankfurt school yeah it was all jews. so eat shit and die w your small brain condescension.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +4 / -5
1
AnonymousShitPoster 1 point ago +1 / -0

your comment is likely spot on but i think given the shape the country is in we’re past the point of pussy footing around things and need to call a spade a spade

2
snoopy3210 2 points ago +5 / -3

Hitler believed in pseudo science too. A fraudulent race theory. Burn in hell satanist.

2
honkdeezee 2 points ago +2 / -0

They enemy of my enemy is still my enemy unless we are of the same understanding or if they're nazis.

2
sluglie 2 points ago +2 / -0

they also added the french marxist school of though from derider and fucho (sp") et al

1
Cozette 1 point ago +1 / -0

Marxists and Facists/Nazis. Rival Leftist Totalitarian gangs. Sometimes allies. Both are Death Cult sects. Heil Hegel.

Fwiw, I understand the appeal of the backward gazing nazi grift that preys on nostalgic utopian lists yearnings. Its more artistic than the futuristic utopianism of the commies grift.

1
nutmeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty sure they migrated to CA as well

1
Testosteroneape2000 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol

1
Pepelosi 1 point ago +2 / -1

He’ll be back with more fun facts in 2 and 2.

1
Frogman123 1 point ago +2 / -1

Where is a based gameshow host when you need one

0
MAGAzineman 0 points ago +1 / -1

Fuck yea, bring back separate but equal too.

-1
JuliusEvola -1 points ago +1 / -2

The greatest story never told:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/mZpeJkSNjcA3/

-1
cook_does -1 points ago +2 / -3

Did (((they))) really!?

1
Cozette 1 point ago +1 / -0

No (((they))) didnt.

Magicians trick. Look (((HERE))) not here.

Well compensated hirelings ie scapegoats and shields.

The name that can be named is not the name -Bagavad Gita.