1748
Comments (462)
sorted by:
120
skynniman 120 points ago +122 / -2

Are they bulletproof?

153
deleted 153 points ago +179 / -26
78
newrandomperson 78 points ago +78 / -0

Don't worry, they have flight suits for that!

75
MayorMcSixaplix 75 points ago +75 / -0

The women in the German army have the Stoppemfrumfloppin.

35
TommyJarvis 35 points ago +35 / -0

In the Swedish army they have “Uverdeshülder Bülderhooldeurs”

4
GabeC1997 4 points ago +4 / -0

lol

3
User_X 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tiddy Masher 5000!

17
RobbieParkersDeadKid 17 points ago +17 / -0

First rate response right there...

13
YouTubeSucksDicks 13 points ago +13 / -0

The best part is that's how a lot of German words are constructed.

3
Pappy_Gunn 3 points ago +3 / -0

You can't be lazy and speak German, that's for sure

3
RiverRunnerVDB 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, you can be lazy and speak it, you just can’t be lazy and write it.

1
Pappy_Gunn 1 point ago +1 / -0

English: C-Ram: Counter Rocket, Artillery, and Mortar (system) German: Nächstbereichschutzsystem.
It Nachstbereises the chschutz using this system.

5
TraitorJoes 5 points ago +5 / -0

The Chinese have the "Wi Hang Lo"

5
EvJohn 5 points ago +5 / -0

Just a guess here, but I'm pretty sure you've not seen many Chinese women topless.

20
deleted 20 points ago +21 / -1
-5
deleted -5 points ago +1 / -6
1
MakeMineMassive 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, that's why they are pushing the vax. No preg out posers in the new military!

2
newrandomperson 2 points ago +2 / -0

The new military is going to be an interesting one. Generals are going to have fun fighting wars with it.

25
Hanging_Chad 25 points ago +25 / -0

Do female warriors get paid gestational/maternity leave?

23
Stolen 23 points ago +25 / -2

Most of the women are men

23
Airvh 23 points ago +23 / -0

The trans dudes get tactical underwear, with a big hole in the rear.

4
RobbieParkersDeadKid 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Feed Port"?

8
KungFluHustler 8 points ago +8 / -0

In my day, most were gay. They still fucked around though.

11
ProphetOfKek 11 points ago +11 / -0

Plenty of “lesbians” out their that still like to hop on a dick.

5
patrioticwinning3 5 points ago +6 / -1

Most lesbians do, its just they are so ugly men won't give them a chance, or they don't want to admit they prefer men because their "girlfriends" Get upset and physically abuse them.... but at least no patriarch amirite ladies :p

1
ProphetOfKek 1 point ago +1 / -0

I bet they feel so empowered as women being able to be abused by a woman instead of a man.

4
Daddy_Knew_Best 4 points ago +4 / -0

you can find these in jail too

2
Pappy_Gunn 2 points ago +2 / -0

I guess you just described most Women's hockey teams

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
NinjaPlease 2 points ago +2 / -0

The strongest ones are

14
MobileDev4Trump 14 points ago +14 / -0

You always know a deployment or underway is coming up when all the women in the division start getting pregnant.

11
BigguthDickuth 11 points ago +11 / -0

Watch how fast the feminist turn into Susie home maker when WWIII breaks out. It’ll be 1955 all over again.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
6
roadrunner0 6 points ago +7 / -1

If you haven't noticed half of all pregnant or mothers with children are unwed and partnerless.. Big daddy government is the supporting father..

3
BigIronBigIron 3 points ago +3 / -0

(That means you)

2
Rakkasan91b 2 points ago +2 / -0

Soo damn true. I even noticed this happening when units were scheduled to rotate through NTC or JRTC during my time in the Army.

11
PleaseFaceWall 11 points ago +11 / -0

5 weeks maternity leave

13
HawkDriverMN 13 points ago +13 / -0

And no deployment.

2
DisbandTheCIA 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wish they at least didn't include it as service time...

Pregnant ? Congrats on your 1 year military career extension.

3
DonuteaterReturns 3 points ago +3 / -0

It should be an immediate discharge.

2
DisbandTheCIA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ya that's better.

8
BrianDamage 8 points ago +8 / -0

Oh trust me it's a hell of a lot more than 5 weeks. I think even the guys get like 4 weeks Paternity leave also.

https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/your-marine-corps/2021/05/06/marines-may-take-up-to-five-months-of-leave-after-giving-birth/

12
Pissed_American 12 points ago +13 / -1

Paternity and maternity leaves I have nothing against. We need more American babies. Besides the left aborts theirs so it will mostly benefit us.

4
Jimmyprawns 4 points ago +4 / -0

The reason for mocking it in the context of the military is that nobody with a brain is an active duty enlisted because they thought it would be a cool place to hook up with another enlisted and start a family. And the prime directive of any nco or officer is to keep all the raging hormones in the barracks from hooking up and reproducing, just out of recklessnes, horniness and proximity.

The majority of the force is not in the start a family phase of life, they are in the transitory college student, or first full-time job period. It's also one of the myriad reasons all those evil old guys thought it would be a horrible idea to make the military co-ed.

In practice, the ones who end up on maternity leave or using the event to separate from the military entirely are the dorm hoes who have no trouble at all mastering thier birth control for all but the last month before their first deployment.

Or those whove been down range a month or two and either given in to the idea of a ticket home or have honestly just drowned themselves in dick. Of course, it is also true that a disturbing number of females don't get through their first year on station without a pregnancy. It would be interesting to hear how the military is handling the recent revisit of Roe v Wade.

1
when_we_win_remember 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure. It's women in the military I have something against. nothing against leave. They can all have permanent leave, now, as long as we don't hire any more.

0
roadrunner0 0 points ago +1 / -1

Doesn't that kind of leave get the time tacked on to the end of your hitch and become unavailable if you are in a war deployment??

1
BrianDamage 1 point ago +1 / -0

maybe... I haven't been on active duty in a long time so I dunno.

3
RolandDelacroix 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep. Standard practice is, 4 years college, then pop out 3 kids while serving your 4 year tour.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
15
deleted 15 points ago +23 / -8
12
Pissed_American 12 points ago +13 / -1

Amen. Military is no place for a female.

4
roadrunner0 4 points ago +8 / -4

What you don't realize is that women can and are far more sadistic and happy heartless killers then men.. Once you flip that switch and they change from being bubble headed girls to women with a weapon that can kill they will.. Russia had entire groups of women soldiers who were snipers and many other positions during WW2.. North Korea has many thousands of female soldiers who are brainwashed killers..

5
BigIronBigIron 5 points ago +5 / -0

Mex cartel chicks are notoriously bloodthirsty.

1
roadrunner0 1 point ago +3 / -2

Exactly, switch the shit on and they are sadistic..

4
Parabellum76 4 points ago +5 / -1

Tbh most of the women snipers stories in WW2 (and other wars for that matter) are just propaganda. Essentially it’s “oh look our little women can slaughter all these -insert bad guy-, no need to be afraid of our enemies, they aren't tough, you can surely crush them”

5
patrioticwinning3 5 points ago +5 / -0

The female sipers for Russia were out of desperation because Russia was getting thier asses handed to them by the Germans! True most backwoods women in Russia were pretty good shots, but again, it was out of desperation, rather than tactics that this happened.

2
CAPTAIN_TENDY_PLATE2 2 points ago +2 / -0

You've fallen for leftist propaganda, my friend.

Women in combat are incompetent as fuck.

2
Pissed_American 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh they have a place defending their homes and families once the men or dead are in some other Frontline. But we're substituting men for chicks. Let's see how this turns out. Not like it's never been tried before..

3
when_we_win_remember 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sorry I reply to you twice, but exactly. If you send women to the front, who is protecting the children when the men are defated?

-2
roadrunner0 -2 points ago +1 / -3

Not just grunts with a rifle in foxholes on the modern battlefield sir.. Women can fly and drive armored vehicles and fly drones and calculate artillery and run comms etc.. Just like the men you have to weed the poor quality ones out of stress and other challenging MOS..

3
Pissed_American 3 points ago +3 / -0

Spartans knew women were best suited in making more men for their army by not raising them to be pussies.

2
DonuteaterReturns 2 points ago +2 / -0

And most of those women got slaughtered. You're falling for wartime Soviet propaganda.

11
jdog 11 points ago +14 / -3

Or they are lesbians and they are all banging each other.

7
citizen667 7 points ago +10 / -3

The girl on the left is sad because small (.)(.) and no railing.

5
Artek 5 points ago +5 / -0

She just got told she needs to shift to the back and off to the side because she's white.

4
citizen667 4 points ago +5 / -1

And she’s the only one that might dress up real nice!

1
no_gal_friend 1 point ago +2 / -1

Just know if your daughter joins the military college... you failed and she is getting railed by all the boys on her platoon sorority at least

ftfy

1
patrioticwinning3 1 point ago +1 / -0

What do you think most females who join the military do before they join :p

10
jdog 10 points ago +12 / -2

Funny how they all get knocked up right before deployment. I'm sure the US military has wasted millions training these females just for them to be useless because they get knocked up.

7
Captain-D 7 points ago +7 / -0

They get knocked up on ships too. When I joined 20+ years ago it was mandatory to get the Depo shot on like the first day of boot camp.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
2
BigguthDickuth 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well they’re alllllll vaxed up now so they are good to go till “they died unexpectedly”.

1
patrioticwinning3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do you think the Pentagon is so gung ho on "Protecting Federal abortions"?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
grenades_and_ham 6 points ago +6 / -0

No fucking shit. 🤣

29
gunteh 29 points ago +29 / -0

Wake me up when they finally get around to developing the tactical thong that goes with the tactical bra so they can match.

3
BigguthDickuth 3 points ago +3 / -0

When I was in we didn’t have tactical anything, I must admit I got a little envious when the Rangers got Gortex cold weather gear and we got soggytex. The tee shirts were the worst though they were like wearing cling wrap.

2
Pappy_Gunn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't get me started. In the Air Force my batman could not get the creases in my pants right and he didn't remove the laces from my shoes before spit-shining them. I had to beat him regularly with my swagger stick.

1
BigguthDickuth 1 point ago +1 / -0

Me and a buddy ended up at Pope Airfield’s chow hall, the tables had tablecloth’s and vases. We were covered in filth. Everyone looked at us like we were Cheech and Chong ordering another bottle of Fuzzy Pussy.

1
Pappy_Gunn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey people think the Air Force is all tablecloth and vases and easy livin'. Lemme tell ya. One time on deployment they had to put us up in a lousy 3 star hotel. Not even a mini-bar, and the A/C was busted. The worse part of it is that they had to double us up in the same room, and the guy I ended up with wasn't even gay.

1
BigguthDickuth 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Horror, I can imagine the terror you experience when the dreams come. The PTSD must be hard to deal with, and I imagine the Air Force just wants to pump you full of psychiatric drugs and forget you ever existed. Good luck on your road to recovery brother.

1
Pappy_Gunn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well we all join up for the hardcore psychiatric drugs, man. How else would they get you to sit on an ejection seat strapped to a gas tank loaded with bombs?

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

Soggytex 😂

1
ATK69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hi speed low drag.

21
Teflon 21 points ago +21 / -0

Seems like they have a huge opportunity here to make the world's best bra and make a fortune selling it worldwide.

8
Hanging_Chad 8 points ago +8 / -0

They've already made the world's best cv-19 vaxx. Wonder why they haven't tried selling it...

1
SlowBurningRage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except they'll cost $3 million each.

5
BigIronBigIron 5 points ago +5 / -0

No, but at the first sign of trouble they hit the deck.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
82
sustainable_saltmine 82 points ago +82 / -0

The only "shape" soldiers should be in is "ready to fight".

28
gunteh 28 points ago +30 / -2

What’s next, tactical thongs?

27
StoryTimeHour 27 points ago +27 / -0

Tactical dialators

10
tellittothedead1 10 points ago +10 / -0

☝️☝️☝️KEK

8
Election_Quotes 8 points ago +8 / -0

As an Aussie, I support this

2
ShartMaster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do you have a link for one of those?

Asking for a friend...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
Hatefullynch 11 points ago +11 / -0

Eh, ex wife was an mp

Normal bras fucked with her tits under her plate

7
Captain-D 7 points ago +9 / -2

I hear what you're saying but as a female who served 20 years ago...you just had to nut up and accept the discomfort made you stronger. The goal was to blend as a female, not stand out for it.

5
Hatefullynch 5 points ago +5 / -0

She had some pretty nice tits, but we used different boots for a reason. Comfort goes a long way

4
TommyJarvis 4 points ago +4 / -0

That’s what “sports bras” are for. They moosh em down so they can be more mobile with less flop. I see women wear plate holders (for weights) to work out and they don’t have any issues.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're also intentionally designed for this purpose, to meld comfort and function. They also look nice on the right women as well, but that's kind of outside the point of military.

I swear we're one step away from having a dance off between the U.S. military and KPop idol groups like BTS to solve our wars.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
4
FliesTheFlag 4 points ago +4 / -0

Buncha Brittney Griners

2
TommyJarvis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bruh, he don’t need it. He’s got pecs.

2
ProphetOfKek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tactical bros? Tactical manziers?

4
Goldsteinbergsky 4 points ago +4 / -0

Notice how only one of those chicks is white too.

71
Gatchya 71 points ago +75 / -4

Fat suit next

41
empiretc 41 points ago +41 / -0

Tactical Onesie

15
AmericaFloats 15 points ago +15 / -0

Tacticorsette

9
3
FromSethWithLove 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, this is totally normal and natural

2
when_we_win_remember 2 points ago +2 / -0

tactispanx

3
K3719er 3 points ago +3 / -0

I mean, flight suits and nomex coveralls are essentially that.

68
tiamat 68 points ago +69 / -1

What's wrong with a typical sports bra, seems reasonable to me

46
anatidaephobia 46 points ago +66 / -20

The government is known to waste tax money, same shit in the space program where NASA spent over $1M on a ball point pen that works in zero gravity. Meanwhile in Soviet Russia they just used lead pencils like civilized people. 🤡

53
-f-b-i- 53 points ago +54 / -1

This isn't true. While the us spent a million on zero g pens space is a myth and the US never went there.

Jk

The graphite in pencils messed with instruments and didn't work either.

26
Red37 26 points ago +27 / -1

The graphite from the pencil could be a fire hazard if it got into the electrical equipment, which is why NASA designed a pen for space that could write upside down. It didn’t cost the millions of dollars claimed.

5
Wtf_socialismreally 5 points ago +5 / -0

The real key was testing it to make sure they could develop it, anyway. Space is not exactly easy to replicate in real world scenarios without some finagling and added costs.

1
Xahnel 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's why we have planes that simulate zero gee. They could have easily rolled the pen test in with any of a dozen other things they pre tested in a zero gee environment.

10
anatidaephobia 10 points ago +11 / -1

Yea, I wouldn't know, but I'm not surprised. This is from a pro Soviet book I found on the shitter while on vacation to the DDR, it was full of anti American "facts" and myths, but probably not very accurate. Pretty fun reading tho while on the shitter.

2
PensivePatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh it was plenty accurate, if your entire point is to shit unfairly on your perceived adversary.

We don’t really do humor that way. I find it funny that they try and mock… our ability to overspend on a government project in search of a superior result? Mocking the very endeavor of the creative process itself in favor of good old fashioned “aw-shucks” Soviet ingenuity?

Only a Marxist I suppose.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
hillaryforprison 1 point ago +1 / -0

US never went to space?

-23
ultra-tera-maga -23 points ago +5 / -28

The world is flat. I'll say it. Einstien was an asshole and a coward for making us think otherwise.

10
80960KA 10 points ago +10 / -0

Einstien

"The Earth is a spheroid" predates him by like a couple thousand years. Romans knew the Earth was a spheroid, Greeks did too.

-18
ultra-tera-maga -18 points ago +3 / -21

That's nice, I was talking about his Lambda non-sense. The world is flat and infinite, once you account for local variations.

9
jimmityjimjimjim 9 points ago +10 / -1

Dear Lord, it’s a an imbecile

-11
ultra-tera-maga -11 points ago +2 / -13

Seeeeeethe, lmfao!

3
ManlyFirmness 3 points ago +3 / -0

Infinite?

Can I have 40,000 acres?

2
MAGA_Toaster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yours is out in the unexplored frontier regions, like mine. I tried to get there once, but I just ended up landing at home.

3
80960KA 3 points ago +3 / -0

The world is flat and infinite, once you account for local variations.

Is this some like chaos theory/fractal topology thought experiment shit that's much more a cute math trick than anything real

If so at least that's a more fun take on "flat Earth" than usual I guess.

-10
ultra-tera-maga -10 points ago +2 / -12

Holy shit was a wire crossed somewhere? I'll check for spilt water.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

Handshake, check.

Attempts to be the most retarded flat Earther ever by saying Earth is infinite? Check.

0
ultra-tera-maga 0 points ago +1 / -1

Stop projecting your own retardation. I didn't say the Earth was flat, I said the world was. Your world might end outside your line of sight, but reality is much larger.

1
Xahnel 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, sweety, that's Narnia you're describing.

2
Correndo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Eratosthenes proved over 2200 years ago that the Earth is round just by measuring shadows at different points in Egypt and math.

He was within 1.5% of the Earth's actual circumference.

Goddamn I'm tired of this flat Earth trash. The ancient Greeks were well aware of not only the true vastness, but the shape of Earth, and somehow a growing numver of first worlders don't.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can send a weather balloon to an absurdly high altitude, far higher than a plane, into the atmosphere and perceive the curvature of the planet with a camera too.

Flat Earthers attempt to feel smart by "seeing" things that other people don't... because we see reality, and we know how to see pretty easily that the planet is (imperfectly) spherical. We can also witness the rotation of other planets using high powered telescopes, patience and time lapses.

It makes no sense that some of them acknowledge other planets are spherical, but somehow ours isn't.

2
MAGA_Toaster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Technology has made us dumber than cavemen.

Edit: also Marxist school takeovers from last century.

2
Pappy_Gunn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Von Braun proved it by lobbing V2s at London.

-1
ultra-tera-maga -1 points ago +1 / -2

The world is flat, you just assumed I was talking about the clump of dirt you're on because you're self centered.

1
Xahnel 1 point ago +1 / -0

We don't live in DND on the material plane. The largest thing the word "world" can describe is a single planet. You attempting to play semantic games and pretending the actual meaning is different from any meaning the people around you understand is literally identical to how leftists try to redefine reality to fit their fantasies.

1
ultra-tera-maga 1 point ago +1 / -0

lmfao! Your world is much smaller than my kiddo, we can't be friends.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
censorthisss 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol u

1
ultra-tera-maga 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some people can't handle the truth.

12
ronnietherocket 12 points ago +12 / -0

This isn't true: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fact-or-fiction-nasa-spen/

Lead pencils have tips that can break off and cause problems in microgravity. This was done by private investors, not NASA. The USSR also used the pen.

3
Iamcrazy4444 3 points ago +5 / -2

Yeah, and those problems were big problems

Such as the oxygen in the shuttle suddenly being gone because the lead caused a spark and burned it in a flash and frying everything.

3
80960KA 3 points ago +3 / -0

That was an Apollo ground test, long before the Shuttle. It also burned 3 test pilots to death when it happened.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
80960KA 2 points ago +2 / -0

More the 100% oxygen atmosphere than any specific material, and if I recall correctly it was a slightly pressurized O2 atmosphere at that for the ground test. Pretty much anything synthetic is going to burn well in that environment, even stuff normally considered fairly fire resistant.

2
when_we_win_remember 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jeez. I mean I guess it's unfair with hindsight to say that's obvious... but with hindsight that's obvious.

1
Pappy_Gunn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Combo of both. O2 and a lot of extra shit to burn, like Velcro.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
1
Joequill 1 point ago +2 / -1

So this might be a stupid question, but shouldn't they have figured this out in other closed environments like submarines?

2
itsarace2016 2 points ago +3 / -1

Its not only about being enclosed but there not being gravity. So if the graphite caused shard or dust, it would then float around and get into systems.

In submarines, I would assume a pen is still probably (I have no idea) a good idea? But at least you don't have to worry about floating electrically conductive dust.

0
Joequill 0 points ago +1 / -1

Dust floats around anytime people move or air is circulated. So I would assume the super small dust created by using a pencil would cause something of an issue regardless of gravity.

1
itsarace2016 1 point ago +2 / -1

Apparently not enough of an issue to warrant building a whole new variety of pen

Beyond that I don't know

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

That dust would be easier to clean through normal maintenance, as you know it is on a surface and not in the air.

2
Pappy_Gunn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Modern subs produce their own O2 and the inside is at atmospheric pressure. The spacecraft has to carry all this O2 with it, and is pressurized very low pressure. Ultimately to save weight on spacecraft structure. They have to increase the O2 partial pressure (so the blood can absorb the O2) and the only way to do this is to increase the amount of O2 in the craft's athmosphere.

Anyway that's the way I understand it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Pappy_Gunn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Paul C. Fisher developped it in 1966 for NASA. I have a couple here.

1
ronnietherocket 1 point ago +1 / -0

NASA did not pay a cent for it until his company had finished developing them.

1
Pappy_Gunn 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's right.

1
anatidaephobia 1 point ago +2 / -1

Thanks, -f-b-i- already informed me.

3
gunteh 3 points ago +6 / -3

America wins on engineering and innovation coolness. Russians win on practicality and cost.

2
anatidaephobia 2 points ago +3 / -1

I wouldn't say Soviet wins on cost either, when you cheap out too much it usually gets more expensive in the end. Like with Chernobyl. What happened there could never happen in a western nuclear power plant.

1
Wtf_socialismreally 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let's not revise history here, though: a lot of safeties and safety protocols are in place in part because of Chernobyl.

1
when_we_win_remember 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wouldn't say it's revising history to say that the Soviets didn't give a fuck.

0
anatidaephobia 0 points ago +1 / -1

The most important one tho, the concrete skeleton which prevents the fuel to hit the groundwater and cause a massive explosion in case of a meltdown existed allover the west, even before Chernobyl.

Even before Chernobyl, if a western reactor would have a meltdown it wouldn't have been nearly as big disaster. It would have been bad, but never as bad as Chernobyl.

1
Pappy_Gunn 1 point ago +1 / -0

Whose flag is on the moon again?

2
IncredibleMrE1 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yep, it's all a bunch of graft.

1
NimbleNomad9 1 point ago +1 / -0

Regular pencil shavings created fires on the Russian side, sooooo

13
freebirdie 13 points ago +13 / -0

Thank you. I've done all manner of hiking, camping, sports, and shooting in regular sports bras and never once thought "this needs to be way more tactical". Then again, I'm a XX chromosome woman, and don't need a size 42 AA bra.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dude. An ACOG or some shit down the cleavage would be so nice for spotting mines that you've stepped on!

2
freebirdie 2 points ago +2 / -0

😂 factory originals only shoot milk

11
lefty295 11 points ago +11 / -0

Nah dude, it’s a tactical brassiere and my boy who is a contractor needs a couple of million to invent this COMPLETELY NEW IDEA, that’s never been tried before.

3
Induceddrag 3 points ago +3 / -0

Take a regular sports bra and sew some MOLLE on it, say you are going to make them in a plant in the district of somebody on the armed services committee.

6
CLF3 6 points ago +6 / -0

Nothing, but it's an excuse to get more appropriations money they can divert to feed black projects.,

2
Allister 2 points ago +2 / -0

No money laundering to cronies and no kickbacks to contractors if they just use an over the counter sports bra!

36
Juantinntwo 36 points ago +37 / -1

Over-the-shoulder boulder holder

12
zooty 12 points ago +12 / -0

Over-the-shoulder soldier boulder holder.

33
Wfdeacon88 33 points ago +35 / -2

We're fucked.

18
deleted 18 points ago +20 / -2
6
Krat 6 points ago +6 / -0

This correct, we are just an enslaved and manipulated economy for other countries

10
RStroud 10 points ago +10 / -0

We're fine. We have huge buffer oceans. The Air Force, Navy, and Marines are really all we need for external threats. A large, over trained and equiped standing Army is just waste and a temptation to use it.

The biggest threat to the state is internal tensions going hot.

5
2Fangz 5 points ago +5 / -0

That last line is why we're fucked.

There's no convenient Mason-Dixon Line this time, and it's not so neatly divided between city and rural as some have suggested. It is going to be block by block, house by house ugliness.

And after a week or two of collapse, when the power is out, and hunger has set in, buffer oceans won't be enough. People (not us) would actually be thankful for China restoring order.

2
11Bignveiny 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed about the ocean buffers, but the Marines as a ‘separate’ service aren’t really needed either

Since we’re on the subject, I’m gonna piss off a lot of people and say just keep two branches, the Navy and the Army. The USAF’s assets would get divided into what makes the best sense for either the naval or land mission, but the majority would most likely go to the Army, as the Navy already has their own air forces

Ironically, a massive amount of soldiers would get cut from the Army, and the majority of the it’s budget would become re-directed to support their new found air power. But just like in most of American history, a small-ish cadre of soldiers would be kept around, to preserve ground combat knowledge and to rapidly train an army if the homeland was ever invaded (unlikely)

The USMC would get folded into the Army, and loaned out to the Navy. The Army’s massive fleet of transport ships would get folded into the Navy. The Navy doesn’t get have its own private army, and the Army doesn’t get to have its own private navy, too much mission overlap

1
RStroud 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the current Navy model makes the most sense for strategic defense. They have both aircraft and Marines. They're best placed for decisive deployment, but are under equipped/staffed to entangle us in a protracted occupation.

The Bush/Obama doctrine that the enemy has to love you and embrace western values is flawed. Blowing stuff up and crippling the enemy is winning.

24
FuckChinaJoe 24 points ago +27 / -3

Do they even have two lesbian moms to join the military?

15
Tr0mp 15 points ago +15 / -0

No, it's for the fat man boobs for all the recruits on hormones

4
FuckChinaJoe 4 points ago +5 / -1

Tactical transgenderism incoming!

5
gunteh 5 points ago +5 / -0

Tacti-trans?

2
Maga_bigly 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trans ical?

1
MAGA_Toaster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Transcicle. 😖

8
JMaN 8 points ago +9 / -1

They're busy developing ad campaign cartoons to recruit the lesbian moms.

24
BizarreCzar 24 points ago +25 / -1

“We should be tactical, brah.”

“No, son. Not like that. Put this on.”

4
Oldjeansandbelt 4 points ago +4 / -0

TACTITTIES

18
Boruzu 18 points ago +19 / -1

Tactital

17
WinstonSmith1984 17 points ago +17 / -0

TacTitties!

8
CornTurd 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'll keep you abreast the situation sir. Get to the motorboat.

2
WinstonSmith1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hoist the SUYT flag!

2
CornTurd 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good job Private Brumsky

2
WinstonSmith1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

kek

4
Recyclops 4 points ago +4 / -0

Developed in the great town of Sugartit, KY.

3
memechallenger33 3 points ago +3 / -0

I didn’t want to laugh… but so did. :) happy day Pede!

3
WinstonSmith1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

Happy to have brightened your day a little. Have a great weekend:)

17
Wexit-Delecto 17 points ago +17 / -0

For men too right? #NoMoobLeftBehind

15
ProphetOfKek 15 points ago +16 / -1

Are they developing tactical implants too?

10
Red37 10 points ago +10 / -0

One of the recruitment incentives proposed during the height of the surge was free breast implants for female soldiers.

5
Whimpy13 5 points ago +5 / -0

Just the females? Reeeeee! 🤡🌎

2
ProphetOfKek 2 points ago +2 / -0

So as I suspected they are trying to create tranny brigades

13
DrSourRaspberries 13 points ago +14 / -1

This seems like a good idea. Women already use their bras for storage. If we're going to have women in the army then they should definitely develop tactical bras for them.

20
IncredibleMrE1 20 points ago +22 / -2

How about we just not have women in the military.

2
DrSourRaspberries 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think they're fair game so long as they can meet the same standards as the men. Most of them can't but surely some of them can.

8
WinstonSmith1984 8 points ago +9 / -1

I agree, but the meme ground is too fertile to leave unharvested

12
Fr330rD13 12 points ago +12 / -0

I will volunteer to help assess these designs for the good of the nation......now show me your tits. It's for Uncle Sam ladies.

1
jimmyfoxhound 1 point ago +1 / -0

You did see the picture of the 'women' in the article right? They look about as sexy as roadkill

11
Crappydatum 11 points ago +11 / -0

Kevin Costner needs one

9
BostonVoter 9 points ago +11 / -2

What happened to our Military? This happened quick.

We need to take 33% of the military and lock them up. Or send them off to war , to figure it out.

I look at the military now as one big LGBTQP party

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
Dogebastian 1 point ago +1 / -0

what does "most" mean here......?

3
Krat 3 points ago +3 / -0

Democrats happened and that's what happens when you let them have an entire government

9
Faulkner 9 points ago +9 / -0

Is there such a thing as a tactical jockstrap?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
RStroud 2 points ago +2 / -0

Could be useful if you're a bad guy in a robocop movie.

1
memechallenger33 1 point ago +1 / -0

Awesome

8
Autopilot__Off 8 points ago +9 / -1

Completely useless , considering almost every one of these dumb bitches will make damn sure to get pregnant right before deployment.

1
RootinTootin 1 point ago +2 / -1

Depends what you mean by dumb. If you want to start a family and have government pay for it, plus all the other perks of being a vet, doesn’t sound too bad.

1
Autopilot__Off 1 point ago +1 / -0

A fair point indeed.

7
xBigCoffinHunter 7 points ago +7 / -0

Manzier!

Bro!

Manzier!

6
go_pound_salt 6 points ago +6 / -0

They have plenty of test subjects in all those army TikTok dancers.

6
Juantinntwo 6 points ago +6 / -0

Omfg they made outfits for pregnant and nursing women. WTF?? We must be REALLY hurting with recruitment to send pregnant women into action.

5
Owmyballz 5 points ago +5 / -0

They should be developing a tactical girdle to conceal their fat rolls.

5
RootinTootin 5 points ago +6 / -1

I thought dudes had to buy their own under Armour jockies themselves, or any other compression clothes for that matter. Has this changed too?

4
Northernrebel 4 points ago +4 / -0

Whip out those tactical titties!

4
MrSir 4 points ago +4 / -0

I figured they would already have one.

4
Keaton 4 points ago +4 / -0

Kids Next Door predicted this. B.R.A., Battle Ready Armor.

4
Wfdeacon88 4 points ago +5 / -1

For all the Trannies that taxpayers just funded getting fake tits. Our military is gone. Only the mentally ill and obedient leftist lunatics are left.

2
LURKER-69 2 points ago +3 / -1

It took way too much scrolling to get to a tranny comment here. This is probably more of the motivation here. Will also come with optional extra padding with "nipple" points to help the trannys look more feminine

4
Correndo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Goddmann this is so fucking stupid.

They also have "tactical" briefs that no one uses.

I've always vehemently opposed women in combat roles except in very specific tactical or cultural circumstances*; even the infantrywomen of the IDF are mostly a myth since they're barred from the front lines. Now I'm starting to feel like women shouldn't be in any of the current branches at all.

I know that seems extreme, but if you've personally seen how ineffective and drama-creating female service members actually are, you'd change tune.

*An example is the all female Marine unit in Iraq that was able to access enemy secrets by being able to communicate with Iraqi women (under male Marine supervison lol) when men couldn't due to cultural reasons.

2
TheImpossible1 2 points ago +3 / -1

Why should we have to die to save feminist countries that only serve women like Taiwan and Ukraine?

4
USAGUY1691 4 points ago +4 / -0

why does the white girl have to stand by herself?

3
Trythisagain 3 points ago +3 / -0

She’s mean, the others are scared of her.

3
DrTar 3 points ago +3 / -0

Milley needs one.

3
cook_does 3 points ago +3 / -0

Could you get uglier models?

Also, will this be their only armor? It works fine in video games this way.

3
123breadman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yea the sacred bra works wonders when fighting lv99 baphomet

3
Captain-D 3 points ago +3 / -0

Our military has never been at a weaker point in its history.

And I am a female veteran saying this.

3
FuckRedditMAGAMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

"they're meant to address cognitive issues caused by poor fit and discomfort"

Translation: women literally cannot think straight if they're even the slightest bit uncomfortable

Translation of the translation: women have no place in combat

3
Pederella 3 points ago +3 / -0

What the hell? I don't see any Ma'am representation. Moobs are real, and difficult to fit in the gyno-staucracy undergarment world.

3
CovfefeAnon 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
ironhorse 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's cold as a witches tit in a cast iron bra.

3
Groundpounder 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, but does it fit Mark Milley? 🤔

3
ThirteenPercenter 3 points ago +3 / -0

(the goal was) reduce the cognitive burden (on women soldiers)

How long until China invades USA at this rate?

3
Threeballes 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nancy Pelosi could use one of these.

3
BoughtByBloomberg2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Eh I don't see the problem. With how fat the men are getting they'll need a moob holder anyway.

3
dahdahdah_dahditdah 3 points ago +3 / -0

If only they had a way to have the soldiers themselves be a little taller with more muscle mass, pain tolerance, lifting strength, speed, and aggressiveness.

Oh well, guess that’s an impossible wish.

3
VarusSPQR 3 points ago +3 / -0

Chest binding

2
ubermk3 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are nothing but female globalist mercenaries and the models they chose look like shit, which is fitting. The ARMY is a pathetic joke.

2
Wrexxis780 2 points ago +2 / -0

So what makes them tactical?

4
AbrahamLincoln 4 points ago +4 / -0

The price, probably.

2
godgoldnguns 2 points ago +2 / -0

To complement tactical panties developed in 2008 for Big Mike

2
JoeBidensDementia1 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're called sports bras you dumb fucks.

2
Jimmyprawns 2 points ago +2 / -0

More money wasting/laundering. The implication here is that the army has been neglecting the needs of it's female membership but has now seen the light and will make atonement for it's sins. The reality is that officers and enlisteds will just keep buying thier own damn underwear. It'll be whatever works for the individual without interfering with uniform standards and appearance. And whoever it is at the Pentagon who needed a pet project to justify their existence will get one.

It's not like the sports bra hasn't already been invented. The government loves to reinvent wheels and come up with something square in the process. This thing will just end up being the worst piece of shit ever made and all the females will get forced to wear it. Probably only during basic and possibly during AIT, but whatever it's just another money, time and resource wasting circle jerk brought to you by the Pentagon.

2
alucard13mmfmj 2 points ago +2 / -0

So... boob armor that western sjw seems to hate.

2
IvIA6A 2 points ago +2 / -0

What for like women?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0