3133
Comments (782)
sorted by:
314
Julia_J 314 points ago +373 / -59

These "people" are not normal. Sex has at 14 has never been okay. Not now, and not in medieval times.

Edit: To clarify for those who don't understand what I meant, sex at 14 has never been okay, not even in medieval times. I don't care if society back then considered it normal. It has never been okay.

203
cyberwar 203 points ago +236 / -33

Hate to tell you but in early medieval times girls were marriageable at 13 years old

113
Cyer6 113 points ago +125 / -12

Even into the seventeen and eighteen hundreds here in America, girls were marrying off in that age range (14-15). Age of consent back in those days could be 10-16+ years old depending on what state you lived in. At some point, some people said no, that's too young.

119
FucKamala 119 points ago +170 / -51

People also lived to the ripe old age of 40

186
deleted 186 points ago +193 / -7
176
Bohemyth_2 176 points ago +178 / -2

The "Christian playbook" guarantees prevention of disease and unwanted pregnancies, two things the left craves for its desired societal instabilities

58
TheLesserBambino 58 points ago +59 / -1

I'll go so far as to say, I don't know why it HAS to be seen as a "Christian" thing. Lot's of cultures have learned the lesson the promiscuity is bad. And early unattached promiscuity, doubly so.

9
Long_time_lurker 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's funny because for the few societies where that wasn't so much the case, they were mostly islands that didn't have STDs native to them.

-18
reagan2024 -18 points ago +6 / -24

Sexual promiscuity has been great for me.

31
FUSnowflake 31 points ago +31 / -0

You forgot

broken hearts baggage inability to pair bond higher divorce rate generational welfare

12
kernel 12 points ago +12 / -0

That and that the marriage is based on real long term companionship not horniness (that won't last forever).

7
DJTrump 7 points ago +7 / -0

Society has done a good job of treating infatuation like its love, so much so that's what most young people believe. And they aren't taught that actual meaningful love takes years to develop.

44
heeeeeemeyer 44 points ago +45 / -1

It would be good if they taught high schoolers statistics (e.g. the dangers of taking the mean of a bimodal distribution) instead of focusing on pronouns and crossdressing.

32
MawaDeBlanco1 32 points ago +32 / -0

They barely, and I mean barely teach statistics in college, and I have an MBA. I didn't REALLY learn statistics until I got a six-sigma black belt.

33
Megascandal 33 points ago +33 / -0

Logic, civics, taxes, being able to research, statistics and how they are manipulated.

None of that is really taught.

11
sordfysh 11 points ago +11 / -0

Oh that makes sense now!

I got a Six Sigma thing, and I couldn't figure out what the big deal was.

I studied engineering and took some advanced statistics classes.

4
RStroud 4 points ago +4 / -0

Statistics is hard. Students really need a grasp of calculus and linear algebra to understand the concepts and do the work beyond a simple introductory level.

The only people that really take statistics beyond the intro level are finance, economics, physics, engineering, and statistics majors plus some grad students.

13
trump4045 13 points ago +13 / -0

Lol that would make people able to see through fake science and media lies. Can't have that.

5
Geralt_of_Rivia1 5 points ago +7 / -2

Eh, it wasnt really a bimodal distribution. There was an extremely high death rate in the very early years of someone's life, followed by a pretty constant and by modern standards high death rate after that.

10
analog_shitposter 10 points ago +10 / -0

Sounds bimodal to me

3
heeeeeemeyer 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you plot a histogram with age on the x-axis and frequency of death at age x on the y-axis, there's a hump at infant age and at old age. Central tendency at two locations is bimodal.

1
okboomer59 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly this

19
RuleoVicus 19 points ago +20 / -1

Good to know some people know this fact. Makes it easier for me lol

14
War_Hamster 14 points ago +14 / -0

Beat me to it. This is correct.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
5
oldhankdonald 5 points ago +6 / -1

Not sure it’s an outlier if it drags life expectancy down 50%. More like an “infant mortality curve” - hence the name!

46
CrackerJack2 46 points ago +46 / -0

I have a Bible from 1829 that has a births and deaths family section written in.
Someone lived to 104 years old.

"Oh my God, how can people live without Big Pharma!"

27
Geralt_of_Rivia1 27 points ago +27 / -0

There are photographs of revolutionary war veterans.

https://media.phillyvoice.com/media/images/2VP.width-704.png

For instance this man, who enlisted in 1781 at the age of 16, and was photographed in 1860. And he lived to 1866

"Oh my God, how can people live without Big Pharma!"

Yep. Extremely old ages are entirely natural. Medications prevent people instantly dying of some major illness, but they generally harm your body - go talk to a nephrologist and ask for a complete list of nephrotoxic medications. They will basically tell you it is 95% of medications known to man, which is why medications should only be used when they are needed

1
Robotacular 1 point ago +1 / -0

What about Vitamins & supplements?

11
anon09 11 points ago +11 / -0

plato lived to 80, and this was thousands of years ago before any modern medicine or science

11
alcowiggles 11 points ago +11 / -0

Hipocrates and Galen lived till 90. And one of Alexanders' generals died at around that age too while fighting in war.

6
D__1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Joe Biden has entered the chat

...roams aimlessly....

...Meanders off in the direction of ice cream truck music.

1
patch6 1 point ago +1 / -0

Modern medicine is a fucking aberration. The longer lives are due to childhood mortality being reduced, not life extension technology.

But that said, they now clamp the damned umbilical cords. All kinds of vital nutrients are being sloughed into the baby through that; it turns white and empty-looking when that function is finished.

3
FucKamala 3 points ago +4 / -1

FFS, so many of you can't just let a joke be a joke

15
TheLesserBambino 15 points ago +15 / -0

Sir, this is the internet. There are no jokes here.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
36
heeeeeemeyer 36 points ago +37 / -1

Life expectancy hasn't changed all that much since the 1800s. Infant mortality has improved. Two very different things.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +2 / -7
8
Klown_Schwab 8 points ago +8 / -0

High infant mortality dragged the "average" life expectancy down.

Lots of babies died but if you made it past age ~10 you'd probably live until 65~75.

The vast majority of adults weren't dying at age 30.

This is basic stuff. You inummerate buffoon. Learn basic stats. Like what an average is.

This is so stupid I can't tell if you're a troll or genuine this ignorant.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
3
Geralt_of_Rivia1 3 points ago +3 / -0

People lived a lot longer than that, it is just that a lot more people dropped dead at random ages. Excluding children under the age of 5 and you get a life expectancy in the high 50s/low 60s, even higher in areas without malaria (southern Italy, France, Spain, etc had malaria for a damn long time)

2
Tellman125 2 points ago +2 / -0

Therefore, if you have sex at 14, you'll die at 40.

4
FucKamala 4 points ago +4 / -0

And if a 40yo has sex with a 14yo he will also die at 40

2
krog 2 points ago +2 / -0

Entirely natural death by woodchipper.

12
Noxide 12 points ago +14 / -2

That was probably due to how the world was changing. Kids are now expected to know more and stay in schools longer. A lot of those young teens that got married early on where out of necessity cause often their parents where dead. We don't have a lot of situations like that anymore or rather we supposedly have better solutions, (although I personally think there's still a lot more to be desired on how we handle our orphan situations)

10
MindlessChaos 10 points ago +10 / -0

I dont know the reason it changed, but no, standards are lower now. You would know a trade/role by then or be educated if you were weathier. Not a situation with parents being dead either, tho for some that may have been the case.

12
K-Harbour 12 points ago +12 / -0

“I’ve never seen anyone get triggered….”

If true, our society has gotten taken over.

10
Dialectic 10 points ago +10 / -0

It’s a city troll talking about other city trolls acting degenerate.

Cities are disgusting

11
deleted 11 points ago +12 / -1
4
RexCollumSilvarum 4 points ago +4 / -0

I often think the elites are playing some 4-D chess with the plebeians when it comes to the age of consent.

Historically it has not been unusual for the man to be several years older than the woman, and for people to marry young, but under today's laws, if the girl is 15 years and 11 months and the boy is 18 years and one day, suddenly he's legally some kind of predator, which is total nonsense.

Normal people see how ridiculous that is and start thinking that age-of-consent laws in general are bad, which the elites then piggyback on and start taking 6-year-olds to Epstein Island for 60-year-old pedos to have their way with.

9
SpaceCadet0106 9 points ago +9 / -0

Hold up, this is the same as those death statistics where people died at “40” in olden days when in actuality the child mortality was so high it just brought the age down when people often and most likely lived to be 80+ If they survived childhood.

Yes it was “legal” to marry girls off at young ages but what was the actual average age? In lots of places the actual average age of marriage was 26 to 27 (1700s) statistic.

6
FTR22 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ever wonder why that happened? It was because the country actually believed and lived their lives according to that little revelation in the bible that states that there should be NO sexual relations until marriage. To have sex before marriage is called fornication. Look it up in the bible about what Jesus and Paul said about the subject.

60
RonBohr 60 points ago +62 / -2

The key there is that they were married, by mutual agreement of both families, thus prepared and enabled to begin providing for themselves and their children. That is in no wise the case today where it's all about sex for its own sake with zero responsibility.

23
DonJr2024 23 points ago +27 / -4

it's all about sex for its own sake with zero responsibility

Agreed. But the age doesn't matter. The real issue is that by 14, bodies are ready to work, have sex, be productive etc. And instead teens are treated like nuisances, barely allowed to work, forced into even more useless classes, allowed to play video games all day, etc.

17
Bouldabassed 17 points ago +18 / -1

Agreed. There's a constant push to make "adulthood" later and later, presumably socially engineered by the same people who can't stop screaming from the rooftops about how overpopulated we are. I heard a normie the other day proclaim without a hint of irony that "people aren't really adults until 30 nowadays." All I could think was what the actual fuck?

12
Hanging_Chad 12 points ago +12 / -0

True adulthood is 35. That's when you can be president

9
deleted 9 points ago +11 / -2
3
VoidWanderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

That stems from the studies that say that the brain isn't fully developed until the late 20s and even on into the late 30's, which is where the push for no alcohol, tobacco, etc. for people under 21 comes from. While that line seems true at first glance, due to how most teenagers and people in their 20's act, that may also be a knock on effect from bubblewrapping life like we have to the point that teenagers aren't even remotely prepared by their own family for what life is actually like resulting in stunted mental maturity.

14
MerlynTrump 14 points ago +14 / -0

But was that always the case? I remember reading there was some survey done by French doctors in the 18th century and the average age a girl hit menarche was 16.5, now it's 12.5. Menarche being the start of menstruation which is probably when a woman is first capable of being pregnant. From what I understand in order for female puberty to start their needs to be a certain amount of fat, which in the old days took a while to build up, but now kids are so fat.

15
DonJr2024 15 points ago +15 / -0

Elsewhere I did concede that hormones in food seem to be advancing growth. Not to be crude but I have sen girls who are not fat and have breasts forming by age 9. It's weird.

6
BlackPillBot 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not only that, they are being prescribed and put on pharmaceuticals that alter both their bodies, and brains often times permanently.

4
Geralt_of_Rivia1 4 points ago +5 / -1

Between 1955 and 1959 I was a teenager working on a cattle ranch doing hard manual labor on average ~5 hours a day - consistently an hour and a half minimum 7 days a week, though it wasnt uncommon for it to be sun up to sun set. I ate 3000 calories a day roughly. I was very physically fit, but I just didnt grow that fast - even as a tall person at 6'1" at 17. Though I also kept on growing until I was 21 years old to 6'3" - the Navy both had exercise and let me eat a lot more.

The average American's average exercise routine is the run to their car in the morning. The average American eats 2950 calories a day.

But the average person wont get fat eating 2950 calories a day with minimal exercise until sometime in their late 20s/early 30s, their body will just grow more. So people grow more.

5
LizardKingx001 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think it also varies between thr races.

4
BlackPillBot 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is also true.

6
thisguy883 6 points ago +6 / -0

We get what you're saying, but just because it can do something doesn't mean it should.

Thats the point. We, as a society, have been able to move past this because its no longer a necessity to start a family at such a young age. Kids can finally get an education and start being productive before they bring another person into this world.

I would rather my daughter be more established in life before she starts dating. I dont want her to be some coom brain like i was when I was 17.

17
DonJr2024 17 points ago +17 / -0

I'm not in any rush for my kids to have kids. But I do think an enormous amount of the trouble in the world today stems from kids reaching their teens and instead of physical work and being made responsible for themselves and others, they are made to study even less useful subjects than in grade school, and treated like nuisances, leading to sneaking off and smoking pot, petty theft, vandalism, getting pass out drunk, overactive sex and perverted sex, etc.

My friend is a teacher of young teens and every now and then he gets a teen who has a single parent and is basically raising their younger sibling(s). Every time, that kid is smart, well spoken and responsible way beyond their peers.

2
VolareVia 2 points ago +2 / -0

Really messed up sex is almost entirely due to porn I'd wager. People desensitize themselves to normal depictions of sex, so they seek out more 'taboo' stuff, get desensitized, and enter a downward spiral until you get the really weird stuff like foot fetishes.

6
BlackPillBot 6 points ago +6 / -0

Kids can finally get an education and start being productive before they bring another person into this world.

Except that’s far from what we’re seeing today. They’re EdUcAtEd, and most are only productive if you consider going into extreme amounts of debt to have the privilege of selling your soul to a globohomo corporation who will fire you if you don’t give them full autonomy over your body. Even then, many of the jobs young women have today are useless unfulfilling made up “diversity” positions including, but not limited to HR trash, and inclusion administrators/directors.

3
thisguy883 3 points ago +3 / -0

So the alternative is to let them have sex at a young age and risk being pregnant before adulthood?

I get that there is so much wrong with our government, but I'm not going to advocate letting kids fuck each other and get pregnant because, "Fuck the education system".

4
BlackPillBot 4 points ago +4 / -0

So the alternative is to let them have sex at a young age and risk being pregnant before adulthood?

I didn’t say that, but I will tell you that we live in an imperfect world, and what we’re doing now obviously isn’t working. I’ll also point out that many people who are reproducing at what is considered the age of adulthood are worthless POS who shouldn’t have kids at any age. What I am definitely saying is that young women, and society at large would be much better if they consoomed building, and rearing a family sooner than consooming HiGhEr eDuCaTiOn which more times than not destroys their minds, enslaves them in debt, and adds absolutely no value, or even worse, devalues them in the eyes of many men today, and rightfully so. On top of that, the more women in the workforce, the more it lowers, and suppresses wages for everyone, especially men. It’s a lose lose situation across the board IMHO, and modern day conditions prove me correct.

4
Geralt_of_Rivia1 4 points ago +5 / -1

14 year olds cant handle being pregnant reliably without modern medicine, it isnt safe. The age that lets women have the most children is something between 17 and 19 depending on methodology.

8
cyberwar 8 points ago +9 / -1

yea I just gave the facts from history, it's in no way an endorsement of predditors

37
IM_A_TRIVIAL_PURSUIT 37 points ago +38 / -1

BEING MARRIED IS DIFFERENT TO BEING THE NEIGHBORHOOD SLUT.

16
BlackPillBot 16 points ago +16 / -0

Yup, and nobody has even touched on the destruction of truly deep pairbonding, and how it’s been completely destroyed in modern times.

3
VolareVia 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'd also like to mention that restricting oneself from pre-marital sex is a lot more manageable if one matures enough to be ready for marriage in one's 20s.

And hormonally it's a lot better. One can very easily become desensitized to oxytocin, the 'love' hormone that reinforces bonds, with premarital sex. The divorce rate for people who avoid premarital sex altogether is much lower than those with even just one premarital sex partner (different from the man or woman they marry).

3
Hanging_Chad 3 points ago +3 / -0

What if there's a pineapple on their porch?

5
sordfysh 5 points ago +5 / -0

Then obviously that means that any kids in the house are in danger.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Hanging_Chad 3 points ago +3 / -0

It means they're swingers

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Haitianbychoice360 2 points ago +2 / -0

KEK

7
TrannysArentHuman 7 points ago +8 / -1

In Mohammed times 13 was 5.

14
sordfysh 14 points ago +16 / -2

Because Mohammed is a pedophile and so are his loyal followers.

6
GodDamnedEngineer 6 points ago +15 / -9

LOVE TO INFORM YOU THAT BACK THEN A WOMANS RESPONSABILITIES WAS HER FAMILY AND SHE LIVED UNDER THE DIRECTION AND GUIDANCE OF HER NEW HUSBAND.

ALL OF THAT IS NOW GONE AND INSTEAD OF MARRYING OFF FOR SAFETY AND STABILITY YOU SEEM TO EQUATE THAT TO RISKY BEHAVIOR WHICH WILL LIKELY ELIMINATE HER FROM EVER HAVING SAID SAFETY, STABILITY, OR FAMILY.

OH AND BACK IN MIDIEVAL TIMES IF A WOMAN LIVED TO 28 SHE WAS CONSIDERED OLD, REPRODUCTION PRETTY MUCH HAD TO HAPPEN BY 17.

24
IM_A_TRIVIAL_PURSUIT 24 points ago +25 / -1

STRONG CAPS GAME HERE.

4
Jan6Insurrectionist 4 points ago +4 / -0

They get their "safety, stability and family" from the government now.

-2
thisguy883 -2 points ago +11 / -13

Agreed. Anyone pushing the "But in Medieval times" argument is a fucking borderline pedo / hebe.

Stop using ancient history to justify your need to fuck kids.

SPEZ: Pedos are mad. lol.

9
BigIronBigIron 9 points ago +10 / -1

Or they're just aware of historical norms? The Spartans buggered boys, my saying so doesn't mean I want to buttfuck ancient Greek twinks.

-2
thisguy883 -2 points ago +4 / -6

Again, being aware of "Historical Norms" does not mean you could use it in an argument to justify fucking children.

Just because it was accepted back in ancient times does not mean it will be accepted now.

Its like saying that back in the day, cavemen would hit women over the head with a rock and rape them, so its been around forever and therefore I should be allowed to do this.

Its fucking nonsense.

6
BigIronBigIron 6 points ago +7 / -1

This lady doth protest waaaay too much.

You are all over this comment thread shouting about how much you love not fucking kids.

I'd bet good money this guy isn't allowed to be within 200 yards of a playground.

35
Noxide 35 points ago +41 / -6

While I agree with you that 14 is not OK, you are very much wrong about that medieval times part.

0
Julia_J 0 points ago +11 / -11

To clarify for those who don't understand what I meant, sex at 14 has never been okay, not even in medieval times. I don't care if society back then considered it normal. It has never been okay.

6
ManOnTheEdge 6 points ago +6 / -0

this is a bizarre modern POV, everyone parroting because they are afraid of being called a pedo.

reality is, within the biological window of fertility, women have always married, in all sorts of societies, all through history

the only reason that is not done today has nothing to do with right-thinking, but because of extended adolescence

go back just a couple generations in your family tree and you will find maternal ancestors who were getting married and having babies easily as early as 14, sometimes even slightly earlier

this is one reason so many renaissance paintings had scenes of mothers that looked really young with infants, it was a thing

my grandmother had my oldest aunt at age 14, and she was married

in fact, it's probably the case that delaying the conception of children until mid to late 20's like a lot of people do is part of the drop in fertility overall (though probably not the primary driver of that drop, lots of other things in play)

but i think we can all agree without reservation, that unmarried women should not be having sex at that age, and if you ask me, sex is only proper within marriage regardless of your gender, or whether you are a teenager or an older person

what we really hate is some 40-year old man duping some 14-year old with daddy issues into having sex, getting knocked up, and having an abortion. that shit has to stop, and anyone doing that sort of thing to a pre-pubescent should be hanged by the neck until dead

4
TheRedPilledArtist 4 points ago +4 / -0

You, sir, perfectly articulated it; thank you!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
TexasFox 0 points ago +8 / -8

You say that, but why. Morality changes as society changes. Sometimes for the better and sometimes not. School for everyone is a very recent modern invention. To be successful in society today you need a modern education that takes time. Having kids and getting married early threatens that. Also, since we have it so damn easy now, we mature slower. Going back in time, you were working fields, tending house, hunting, or learning to fight by the time you could reach over your head and touch your ear. By 14 your parents were on their way out or already departed. Different time different rules. Don't just a past society on morals of today, we have luxuries they didnt.

3
akira2501 3 points ago +4 / -1

By 14 your parents were on their way out or already departed.

What are you basing this idea on?

Don't just a past society on morals of today, we have luxuries they didnt.

Yea, like hospitals. It would have been monumentally stupid to have a child before your body is ready.

2
TexasFox 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's based on historical records. Depending on where and how you lived life expectancy was short, 30-40 and in the best conditions 60s. Disease and and common alements we take for granted today were stone killers in the past. Dentistry of all things is credited with the largest expansion of life expectancy. As to when the body is ready, that is nature. The female body is perfectly able to bear childern at the onset of menses, sadly my wife deliveres way to many of them. The problem is not biologic, it is level of maturity. We don't mature in current society nearly as fast as we would have just a few hundred years ago.

0
Tendies_or_GTFO 0 points ago +1 / -1

The expected age of a human being who survived infancy long enough to ponder the ideas of sex, marriage, and life expectancy, hasn't been in the 30s or 40s since a long time before Christ (as in BC). Not arguing with your comment that the female body is prepped to to deliver at the onset of menses, but the human body is also prepped to run a marathon once one learns how to use its legs. Doesn't automatically make it a healthy pursuit or a good idea.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
2
TexasFox 2 points ago +4 / -2

I agree, it isn't ok. Just acknowledge sociological realities are different today and be able articulate why. Stomping your foot and screaming isn't going to convince anyone and defeats your own position.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Canadiapede7 0 points ago +1 / -1

People who have never known war, have different morals than people who have never known peace. Slavery was absolutely OK back in the day, we lived by rule of conquest, if you aren't strong enough then you are either gonna die so my family can live or you will work so my family can live longer, pretty simple really.

0
TexasFox 0 points ago +1 / -1

That wasn't even a minority opinion through history. It was just accepted. Today there is no reason to have slavery. But, throughout history slaves served a purpose... hell all modern society was built on the backs of slave. If you were wealthy or powerful (especially what constituted a state) you owned slaves. If you were unable to earn a living for your self you either died, were imprisoned or became a slave. Slavery has also been a historical right of conquest. We sit in a place of privlage judging those that came before us as if their circumstances that led to their social choices are the same. You make the same mistake of those that are pushing the grooming by assuming any social norm can be applied across time in either direction. Stay focused on the realities of today and why it is to shut down their flawed reasoning. What they say is true, but it is not applicable, throw the why back in their face to shut them down until your ready to say fuck it and move on to the step that is comming.

-10
Asilimum -10 points ago +7 / -17

Who cares what you personally think is "okay"

Just because you were a virgin at 15 doesn't mean others have to be, sex happens

-6
stupiditymeter -6 points ago +7 / -13

She's just mad she was the ugly one.

30
Sychinlegacy 30 points ago +39 / -9

Amazing to me how many teenage sex apologists there are in this thread.

Tell me are you clowns ok with YOUR daughter getting railed as a high school frosh? Sure it’s ok when it’s some nameless faceless skank right?

Disgusting.

17
OrenthalGMudbone 17 points ago +18 / -1

I have known multiple women in my life with stories about being manipulated by dudes in their 20s when they were early teens. It's fucked up, probably very widespread and that's the sort of thing these predditors endorse. It affected these women negatively enough for them to tell me the stories out of the blue and it wasn't a "those were the days" reminiscing either.

9
Bernier4Canada 9 points ago +10 / -1

very common. You know the guy in 12th grade who was still fucking 9th graders?

Yeah he didn't just stop when he became 18

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
talltellmanson 0 points ago +1 / -1

bots.

I've been discovering them all over PDW. Sometimes the AI will "read" through an article and post a pre-disposed response to how they want the conversation "steered".

Sometimes they'll mess up by reading the keywords in the article and screwing up their response with something only related by keywords but completely out of context or which makes no sense.

They're here hard core for midterms trying to steer the collective MAGA mind.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
1
talltellmanson 1 point ago +1 / -0

bots.

I've been discovering them all over PDW. Sometimes the AI will "read" through an article and post a pre-disposed response to how they want the conversation "steered".

Sometimes they'll mess up by reading the keywords in the article and screwing up their response with something only related by keywords but completely out of context or which makes no sense.

They're here hard core for midterms trying to steer the collective MAGA mind.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-14
trump4045 -14 points ago +8 / -22

No one said it's ok but you aren't shutting down the sex drive by screaming p333d0 all day long. Your daughter is sneaking out the window and having sex while you post on here calling others pedophiles. Wait till you find out what I was doing when I was 12...

19
sordfysh 19 points ago +23 / -4

The daughter is only sneaking out if they go to a public school where they are taught that young sex is normal and okay.

I know this has been going on for a very long time, but it's not okay. Just because you did it and are okay doesn't make it good nor healthy.

Young girls now are transitioning to being men because they are told that their new relationship with men revolves around sex. And high school girls mostly are not ready yet. Some are, especially those who were raped or molested. But those who aren't see a pathway out by taking puberty blockers.

In Christian schools young women are respected as people, but young people. They are discouraged from engaging their hormonal desires, and this makes sense because you aren't really ready to make good decisions until your hormones balance out a few years after puberty ends. That age is closer to 21 or 25 than 18.

I get it, you drank in middle school. Alcohol is a major aphrodisiac. Smoking cigarettes also modulates your sex drive, which is why it's known to be good after sex. But especially now, kids are doing other drugs, and those drugs don't make you want to fuck. And if kids are totally sober, they will also not want to have sex until later. Especially if they aren't introduced to porn.

This shit isn't normal. When was the last time you talked to the girl you had sex with in middle school or high school. How's she doing? For most women, sex is perceived differently than for men. Chances are, that girl is probably living a very dark life because she was already living a dark life when you both hooked up.

7
DudeThatCame2Sarnath 7 points ago +7 / -0

This shit isn't normal. When was the last time you talked to the girl you had sex with in middle school or high school. How's she doing? For most women, sex is perceived differently than for men. Chances are, that girl is probably living a very dark life because she was already living a dark life when you both hooked up.

Very insightful comment. And one that I am unhappy to have to agree with, but sadly you are correct.

2
VolareVia 2 points ago +2 / -0

There was this girl I used to know way back in middle school who once asked me out on a date, and I felt guilty for lying to her about why I didn't want to. She was really dumb. I told her I wasn't good at commitment. She likely asked because I stood up for her when other people were cruel to her for being dumb.

I'm doing alright for myself now though, and I'm in my 20s.

Years and years later, I see her again, and she's clearly been totally corrupted. Piercings, tattoos, really slutty behaviour, and a dead-end job.

I often wonder how things might have been different if I had not cared about her intelligence and accepted her offer. She would have been around my friends more, and they're all good people...

1
DudeThatCame2Sarnath 1 point ago +1 / -0

You never know, my friend, you never know. I am quite a bit older than you, and I often wonder about what might have happened, as well. Unfortunately, I have seen what often happens.

Per sordyfish's comment, I do believe the person you remember was probably in the same place -- they are living a dark life now, because in some way, they were likely living a dark life then.

I don't know anything about you, so please pardon my presumption, but the fact that you still remember this person, and still want better things for this person, even after all that time, says a great deal about you.

I am glad to hear you are doing alright for yourself, even though you are "only" in your 20s! Keep up the great work, and I hope you have a long, happy, and satisfying life.

7
deleted 7 points ago +10 / -3
-2
Hanging_Chad -2 points ago +2 / -4

out the window

kek imagine not having an alarm system and motion-announcing cameras in TYOOL 2022

when I was 12

I started fappin' in elementary

2
latinolizards4trump 2 points ago +3 / -1

No you didn't lol

1
Canadiapede7 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most boys have gotten their first boner by 8-9, I got Chicken pox when I was 7 and this beautiful friend of my aunts took care of me for a few days because she was the only adult my family trusted who had already had them (I was up in Northern Quebec with my Uncle/Aunt/Cousins staying the summer) boom first crush then first boner a few days later. It didn't take long to realize what was what, it is instinct after all.

1
latinolizards4trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes but boner are different than flat out jerking off lol

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
15
deleted 15 points ago +42 / -27
38
orange_popcicle 38 points ago +40 / -2

Even back in Holy Roman Bohemia young teenage women courted similarly aged men with the watchful eyes of their parents and dowries were written/exchanged.

They didn't go 'looking for sex' because there were expectations and public shaming/humiliation towards their entire family had they been caught with child out of wedlock.

Edit to add: Mothers should teach their daughters the ways of womanhood and not to be ashamed of the nature of their bodies. Father's and brothers should protect those same young women from those who would prey upon them.

25
deleted 25 points ago +26 / -1
15
PureBloodedSuperStr8 15 points ago +15 / -0

Similar experience here. My dad was somewhat distant, and always busy. The church preached that sex before marriage was wrong, and like you said, never explained why. Churches have an issue of being afraid of knowledge, or they’re foolish enough to believe that their child, who is barraged at school every day with secular and communist propaganda, will just ignore it all because the church had a pizza party that told them God created everything.

7
thisguy883 7 points ago +7 / -0

My dad scorned my sister when she got her first car and became super strict with her so she wouldn't be going anywhere he thought there would be boys. She was also required to answer her phone every time he called and if not, her driving privileges were taken away and she would be grounded until he said otherwise.

When my brother got his first car, he told him not to get anyone pregnant and not to drink and drive. That was it.

9
Vino 9 points ago +9 / -0

You only have to worry about one dick with a guy. You have to worry about every dick in town with woman.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
PocketPosse 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like a good dad.

1
orange_popcicle 1 point ago +6 / -5

I quite agree with you. School, church, parents said "No", which isn't the way. Children want to know the why's of it, especially around then. I learned most of what I did from a midnight talk show called "Sex Talks with Sue".

It shouldn't be that way.

We shouldn't be ashamed of our hormones and our nature, and should teach healthy methods of dealing with puberty. And that is for each parent to discuss with their own childten. And at the risk of downvotes I believe giving young adults other methods (like personal masterbation) is okay. Because only talking of abstinence makes people reach out for other options.

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
17
Tejas_Pepe 17 points ago +20 / -3

Father's and brothers should protect those same young women from those who would prey upon them.

Seems like doing that even here gets you called a faggot and told it's natural for girls to have sex at 14.

12
RuleoVicus 12 points ago +14 / -2

No shit, so many false facts about medieval times and "married at 10", which didn't mean they were having sex at that age.

Jesus Christ even in the remaining tribal areas of the world there's no girls at 14 having sex.

11
MerlynTrump 11 points ago +11 / -0

because in the tribal areas her dad would kill the guy!

3
Jan6Insurrectionist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Based savages

2
MerlynTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

noble savages!

2
kornesque 2 points ago +2 / -0

You ever see that black and white photo of the little oyster shucker girls looking miserable, their hands totally trashed? Don't misconstrue my point but those girls were ready to do life at a much younger age than modern she-infants.

12
orange_popcicle 12 points ago +16 / -4

Fucking trolls and incels, the lot of them.

Yes, young women hit puberty before men do. Yet, they're still too emotionally immature to know the consequences of their actions. Which is why they have should have their parents watching over them. The same with young men. Fathers should be keeping an eye on their sons to keep them in line and from doing anything they would rather forget.

The hind lizard brain tells both sexes that they must procreate right now because hormones. Even if they aren't physically or emotionally ready to do so. Most especially girls who have not fully grown into their adult bodies.

5
MerlynTrump 5 points ago +6 / -1

Fathers should be keeping an eye on their sons to keep them in line and from doing anything they would rather forget.

But in America watching your kids isn't considered manly. Real men sit on the couch and watch men in tights run after a damn egg-shaped ball.

1
thisguy883 1 point ago +4 / -3

Pedos and hebes browse this site.

2
BigIronBigIron 2 points ago +3 / -1

You would know, Dr. Pizza

-8
deleted -8 points ago +3 / -11
25
orange_popcicle 25 points ago +26 / -1

Oh, you mean that cautionary tale?

11
MerlynTrump 11 points ago +11 / -0

"I'mma off myself for some ho I won't even think about 10 years from now"!

11
thisguy883 11 points ago +11 / -0

Oh you mean that fiction piece written for entertainment?

5
Athena86 5 points ago +10 / -5

They weren’t real people.

24
Tyrone_biggums 24 points ago +24 / -0

Not just pedos. Her male peers will be seeking to defile her as well. While virginity until marriage would be the standard in a sane world, at least train girls to place some value on their virginity and to give it away voluntarily to someone they are in love with. This is way better for their psychology and society

-13
stupiditymeter -13 points ago +4 / -17

Hahahaha the standard in a sane world.

So you don't have sex. You marry. You have sex. Your peen turns out to be too big for her. Cannot have comfortable sex. What now? You can't divorce in this sane world either, can you? And oof, she's not a virgin anymore so cannot remarry either, eh?

Leave the logic and decision making to the people with at least a tiny grasp on reality.

4
TrumpBump333 4 points ago +4 / -0

Get a doctors check beforehand for the size of your peen and her vagina? Ask for recommendations to increase her width if necessary?

There, done. Now please leave the logic and decision making to the people with at least a tiny grasp on reality.

3
MerlynTrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

if your peen is too big there are "ohnuts".

16
Noxide 16 points ago +18 / -2

Yeah, burying our heads in the sand is what got us here in the first place. We essentially didn't want to talk to out kids about sex and their developments so we let the schools do that and boy oh boy did that backfire.

I think an early season of South Park did an episode about this and it explains it better than I could ever do.

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
17
RoseLovesJesus 17 points ago +18 / -1

I agree that sex should not be treated as taboo and kids need to know about it. But I see people saying 14 year old girls are ready to have sex. This is BULLSHIT!! I am a woman. I was once a 14 year old timid little girl. Yes looking back I consider 14 to be a little girl. When I was 13 I was at my friend's house. Long story short we were going through some VHS tapes that were supposedly her step dad's and we found a tape that had "Cinderella" written on it. We assumed it was the Disney Cinderella. We popped it in and were fucking traumatized. It was a white lady and a black man with a HUGE abnormally sized dick having sex. I was 13. I had never seen graphic sex at that point. That video with the guys huge ugly abnormal sized cock traumatized me so much that I had no interest in sex at all in high school. I even had a major crush on a boy in high school who broke my heart. I honestly lost my virginity at 18 after HS because my Boyfriend at the time pushed me to do it. That also sucked. It sucked so much that I did not have interest in sex for a few more years after that. I'm not sure how things would have progressed if I didn't see that sick video. I thought if that was what sex was like then F That! Luckily I learned that porn is not real sex. But just remembering how traumatized I was just seeing that ugly cock video makes me want to kill pedophiles even more. Sex with kids by adults FUCKS them up for life. Sex should honestly be a beautiful thing between a man and a woman. Society is now run by degenerates though who only push abnormal passionless gay sex without love. They think sex is love. Sad.

3
Jan6Insurrectionist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just imagine how much worse it is nowadays with 24/7 access to all manner of twisted fetish porn.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-6
stupiditymeter -6 points ago +3 / -9

She just told you she's the crazy white feminist. What did you expect.

6
thisguy883 6 points ago +6 / -0

Talking to your children about sex is ok.

Telling your kids that its ok to have sex at their age is not ok.

Hope this helps.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
Noxide 5 points ago +5 / -0

I wouldn't put too much thought in all those downvotes. You seem like you have a good head on your shoulders and know how to protect your kids.

2
MobileDev4Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think most people in history didn't really have to talk about sex with their kids because they would just pick up the facts through watching animals and living in close proximity to adults with little privacy. It's probably a modern phenomenon and maybe a mostly Western one too.

1
stupiditymeter 1 point ago +3 / -2

Teach them what a condom is. If I've learned anything about the Roe v Wade reeeeeing, it's that neither side knows condoms exists.

1
AussieTrumpFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or how the separation and delegation of powers works.

Or just how much of a mouth-breathing NPC the clear majority of our society has become (we already knew it, but it hurts every time it's reinforced by the Mockingbird media).

4
Jan6Insurrectionist 4 points ago +5 / -1

Keeping in mind these same people will then call a 30 year old dating a 25 year old "predatory."

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
Jan6Insurrectionist 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's even worse if you read to your children from the Bible, or from classic Greek or Norse mythology instead of books about homosexual pedophilia.

2
myswedishfriend 2 points ago +2 / -0

She was 12 only 13 years ago, you sick fuck.

2
TwitterIsTrash 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol no. When I was 14, the idea of sex scared tf out of me. I barely even liked guys yet. Only had fleeting crushes on celebrities and boys at school that I knew I had no chance with.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
Hanging_Chad 6 points ago +6 / -0

High schoolers can't keep getting away with this!

201
deleted 201 points ago +202 / -1
84
vote_for_MAGA_2020 84 points ago +84 / -0

“Radical Christian extremism”….”non-Christian pedophiles”…..

I’ll take some of that radical extremism, thanks!

13
TeaPartier_1776 13 points ago +13 / -0

Radical extremism is a bit of a tautology, no? Is there moderate extremism? Perhaps mild?

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
mytummyhurts 4 points ago +5 / -1

It's wordplay to make things sound super extra bad.

Besides, radical Christianity does what, love thy neighbor? Respect their human dignity as a man/woman created in God's image? Give to the poor? Care for widows and orphans? The whole idea is ridiculous.

3
VolareVia 3 points ago +3 / -0

Moderate extremism

If you criticize my grilling you're a dead man

1
Richard_Dangler 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everything is a word salad with these heathens.

17
LetsG0Brandon 17 points ago +18 / -1

So says "Grooming predditors"

4
Jan6Insurrectionist 4 points ago +4 / -0

but here's why it's a good thing!

1
AOCDickPics 1 point ago +2 / -1

Half the people in that thread probably are kids TBH.

You got people asking for parenting advice on Reddit and the average user age is like 15. Not sure what people expect at this point.

185
Nokabal 185 points ago +187 / -2

Reddit creepers calling 14 year old girls women. Fucking slippery Reddit groomer double speak

90
Tyrone_biggums 90 points ago +91 / -1

Also when did shame become a universal negative? Shame is a potent and very constructive force for constraining behavior in ways that have proved to upbuild and sustain societal flourishing. And they want to just cast out shame all together? Do these people ever think one generation beyond their worldview?

31
deleted 31 points ago +35 / -4
13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
1
VolareVia 1 point ago +1 / -0

No.

Bullying is when shithead sadist kids pick a weak target and make their lives hell. This is the absolute LAST thing any boy should be encouraged to do.

Shame is something fathers (because the mothers won't) do to their children to teach them what is unnacceptable behavior. Shame is when a father exercises his authority in a way only he ever would.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
20
StanceDancing 20 points ago +20 / -0

Its because they all feel shame for their actions, and they feel the only way to get it to stop, is to try and force everyone else to get rid of shaming.

Jokes on them tho, because they cant run from themselves.

9
BigIronBigIron 9 points ago +9 / -0

They're big on shame!

Redditors love shame.

Shaming the religious, shaming red states, shaming traditionalists, shaming Chris Pratt...

6
dontdrinksoy 6 points ago +6 / -0

Do these people ever think one generation beyond their worldview?

Nope!

2
RussianBot6969 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes! A big problem with society today is that people don't experience enough shame

12
thisguy883 12 points ago +14 / -2

Look at the top comments here. PDW folk justifying 14 year old kids having sex is ok because they had sex in the "Medieval era".

15
Tyrone_biggums 15 points ago +16 / -1

But it was sex for procreation and they were married. Should we revert back to that? Probably not, we don’t really need to, but it was a different kind of sex than the vapid carnality these Reddit freaks are talking about

4
thisguy883 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes I agree.

What i'm arguing is that reddit and some faggots on here are saying just because it was normal back then, it should be normal now.

Ok? But just because you can, doesnt mean you should. Thats the point of age of consent laws.

I truly believe anyone using the argument that this was normal in the past to justify kids having sex, is probably a closet pedo.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
ObamasLooseButthole 0 points ago +1 / -1

So you're of the opinion that it's not extremely wrong for children to marry adults as long as they have babies together?

1
Tyrone_biggums 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m not talking old farts with paunches, but there are cultural conditions under which marrying off your 15 year old daughter to an 18-19 year old man makes sense. Not in our culture now, but I don’t think that’s objectively immoral

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
2
AussieTrumpFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

But they ARE bullies and bigots. Just don't tell the emperor about his clothes.

3
Puppy528 3 points ago +3 / -0

And they're not even real biologists!

3
infeststation 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think he was insinuating a woman having sex with a 14 year old boy- which is worse than whatever your normal brain concocted.

126
invalid_data 126 points ago +127 / -1

Next year, "sex at 12 is natural!", the next year "sex at 10 is perfectly normal and a good thing", the next next year "sex with an 8 year is a perfectly acceptable practice!"

If we don't say NO now to all this degeneracy pedophilia will become normalized. We 100% started this slippery slope with gay marriage, now we need to end it.

59
wiseracer 59 points ago +61 / -2

Coming soon...

Democrats: sex at 8 is perfectly natural

Republicans: This is sick! We should not be having sex with girls until they're 14.

14
orange_dit 14 points ago +14 / -0

They ultimately want the same the age of consent as the maximum age for abortion: 0

11
ripley88 11 points ago +11 / -0

They won't be happy until they can have sex wìth the fetus and call the pregnant mother a bigot for denying access.

4
highlandparker 4 points ago +4 / -0

I read a horrifying story about pedos having sex w babies w umbilical cord attached

7
TexasFox 7 points ago +7 / -0

So far my wife's record for youngest deliver is 11. She was an illegal brought over the year before.The boyfriend was another illegal that was 17. My sex Ed in the 5th grade back in the 80s was purely biological, talked about the menstrual cycle, the cycle of pregnancy, the myth and realities of how you get pregnant, and ended with graphic pictures of stds. It didn't do much to temper boys ambitions, but it put the girls off for a few years. External influences still pushed them toward sex....movis, music, magazines.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
2
Billyog 2 points ago +2 / -0

The time to say no was 60 years ago.

2
Richard_Dangler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Give em an inch and they'll take a mile. Every. Fucking. Time.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
2
akira2501 2 points ago +2 / -0

You haven't been paying attention to the queer agenda, have you?

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
akira2501 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would I be?

You're presuming to speak for everyone, but you're not particularly aware of the subject? Odd move. More importantly, if you're not aware of this, you're going to be constantly blindsided by the tactic. The OP was right. This is their agenda, he's nailed perfectly where they are going with this. They're explicit about this if you know where to look.

Why are you?

James Lindsay does a really good video series on the subject and breaks down precisely how all this works, where it came from, and what these fuckers are up to... and I enjoy listening to it.

101
iSignedUpForThis 101 points ago +102 / -1

Why are the usernames redacted??

33
Inquisitor_Corvus 33 points ago +33 / -0

This right here ^^^^^^^^^^^!

13
plasma 13 points ago +13 / -0

indeed

9
Haitianbychoice360 9 points ago +9 / -0

Came here to say this.

99
57
deleted 57 points ago +57 / -0
34
nakedjay 34 points ago +34 / -0

Dead Internet Theory for sure.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
5
Doug 5 points ago +5 / -0

Especially this site lol

10
Newuser99 10 points ago +10 / -0
3
user365927285937 3 points ago +6 / -3

Those bots are not really convincing tbh

6
ripley88 6 points ago +8 / -2

You would say that, bot

3
FitOfficial 3 points ago +3 / -0

...boop.

-1
StrawberryWuffle -1 points ago +1 / -2

These bots aren't but the AI technology used for fake bots by the globalists are far more advanced.

1
user365927285937 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s not the technology that is the limitation. It’s the human implementation of that technology. I work with machine learning algorithms. Fields like music and language have a long way to go because quality in those domains is so deeply subjective and nuanced.

86
dudebro 86 points ago +86 / -0

14, mature age. Lol.

These people are monsters.

9
TeaPartier_1776 9 points ago +9 / -0

Maybe if it were the 1800s, or if we were a tribal nation in the Middle East. But these people clearly don’t idealize such times and places, so I can only assume they’re just pedophiles. I mean, a 16-20 year old having that opinion might be acceptable because the age difference isn’t as noticeable, but I assume these posters are in their late 20s or older and that’s just sick.

8
SrzlyYUGEguacbowl 8 points ago +10 / -2

Anyone who wants or supports having sex with a 14 year old is obviously a pedo, and we know that reddit harbors pedo's. Staring at monkey's in a shit throwing fight is fun to point at but looking at it any longer is just a waste of everyone's time.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
cook_does 1 point ago +1 / -0

And morons.

72
MeinDonald 72 points ago +73 / -1

a woman has sex at 14

a woman... at 14...

That is definitely a 40 year old pedophile writing that comment

21
BeNotAfraid 21 points ago +22 / -1

woman

Ummm, correction, a '40 year old pedophile' who is a biologist, akshwallly

6
cook_does 6 points ago +6 / -0

-Whats a woman?-

-3
LizardKingx001 -3 points ago +2 / -5

I guess that's entirely how you view a woman. It's common to say a girl has become a woman when she gets her first period. Biologically maybe that's accurate.

Quincenera are a thing to present the girl who just turned age 15 as a woman for potential suitors

4
MeinDonald 4 points ago +8 / -4

This ain't fuckin Mexico

1
LizardKingx001 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's becoming mexico. Do yyou know how many quinceras occur here?

1
MeinDonald 1 point ago +2 / -1

I understand that. It's still not Mexico and they all need to be deported

59
South_Florida_Guy 59 points ago +59 / -0

But we can't call them groomers, ok

21
thisguy883 21 points ago +21 / -0

because they are Predditors.

58
JustHereForTheSalmon 58 points ago +58 / -0

40 downvotes (minimum) from adults wishing they could have sex with a 14 year old.

10
TheRedPike 10 points ago +10 / -0

40 downvotes (minimum) from lesbians with dicks wishing they could have sex with a 14 year old.

FTFY

52
MadRussian 52 points ago +53 / -1

They say "slut-shamer" like it's a bad thing.

27
Reassess_Reevaluate 27 points ago +27 / -0

In my opinion, we could turn society around by doing two things immediately and the first one is to start slut shaming again.

11
Julia_J 11 points ago +12 / -1

If sex was reserved for a love marriage, a lot of problems in society would be solved.

12
Reassess_Reevaluate 12 points ago +12 / -0

The problem is that it takes maturity and wisdom to understand this. In my teens I used to think that these ideas were outmoded and dumb, but now that I'm in my 40's I realize the reason that the Bible talks about sexual immorality so much.

It's not so much that sexual immorality will effect you personally (which it does), but that it has a follow-on effect of completely destabilizing the fabric of society.

3
Miztivin 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not so much that sexual immorality will effect you personally (which it does), but that it has a follow-on effect of completely destabilizing the fabric of society.

This right here. Even with unlimited free abortions and pills for diseases. It still destroys society on a sociological level.

6
IM_A_TRIVIAL_PURSUIT 6 points ago +6 / -0

THE SAME PEOPLE THINK 'SHIT-EATER' IS A GOOD THING.

5
cook_does 5 points ago +5 / -0

That is literally their sexual identity.

47
deleted 47 points ago +47 / -0
40
T_DforTrump2020 40 points ago +40 / -0

14 year woman? Are they retarded?

12
AmannamedRJ 12 points ago +12 / -0

Nahh just pedophiles.

Witness as commies become extreme liberterians the second fucking children becomes the topic.

Remember when they said we were a harmful ideology as an excuse for banning us?

6
Obvious 6 points ago +6 / -0

No, just reddited.

37
Reassess_Reevaluate 37 points ago +37 / -0

I used to run into people who thought that Sodom and Gomorrah were allegories and merely scary stories to keep people in line because no one's that bad.

Remember, however, when the strangers showed up in town to tell Lot he needed to leave, the townspeople banged on his door demanding that they be allowed to rape these strangers.

MARK MY WORDS. At some point, these people will demand that they be allowed to have sex with your 14 year old daughter and if you say no, then you'll have your kids taken away from you and possibly be imprisoned for being a hateful bigot. This will be codified into law.

"Oh, you're full of shit Reassess, that would never happen"

Yeah, well I remember a time when all they wanted was faggot marriage and now we're having drag queens show up at your church and if you don't dance with them, then the entire church congregation is encouraged to call you a homophobe... that just happened THIS WEEK.

15
Stanwyk74 15 points ago +15 / -0

And they even used the old "who are you to judge?"line

6
orange_popcicle 6 points ago +6 / -0

I wish these guys did more vids:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bar3GOzDNzg

5
Lamech_Slade 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm a little fuzzy on the full explanation, but if memory serves most women were required by law to serve a one year term as temple prostitutes in ancient Corinth.

Christianity changed that...

3
BigIronBigIron 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sounds like unemployed German women these days, if you've been following that news

1
NZbacon 1 point ago +2 / -1

What news? Link us in.

1
BigIronBigIron 1 point ago +4 / -3

Prostitution is legal in Germany now.

"Sex work."

Recently, unemployed German women have been contacted by brothels offering them "employment" as "sex workers."

Here's the rub: if they want to continue receiving unemployment benefits, they can't turn down employment offers.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
22
BeNotAfraid 22 points ago +25 / -3

Then one day, for no reason at all...

6
Pythagoras 6 points ago +8 / -2

Exactly!

20
tyrantsgetthescope 20 points ago +20 / -0

Why block out the usernames

19
MAGAPlenty 19 points ago +19 / -0

A future Ghislaine Maxwell right there

19
Gadbous 19 points ago +19 / -0

Typical groomers....

18
Steel-Wrought-Eagle 18 points ago +19 / -1

Groomers be groomin’. People don’t think it be that way, but it do.

18
LtAmerica1 18 points ago +18 / -0

Was this on r/pedophilia?

18
Kamalas_a_Bitch 18 points ago +18 / -0

Reddit is cancer

15
Stanwyk74 15 points ago +15 / -0

Social media is cancer

18
dayd12134 18 points ago +18 / -0

woman

14

No.

6
IM_A_TRIVIAL_PURSUIT 6 points ago +6 / -0

14 IS ONLY A CLUMP OF CELLS, WHY NOT RAPE IT TO DEATH?

17
Rattatata 17 points ago +18 / -1

Let’s put into an argument.

Sex should never be an end all goal, period. By engrossing oneself in sex all your life, you become addicted akin to any upper drug. People who have sex with multiple people in their life lose the ability to find connections with others using neutral interests.

By starting this early in life, the 14 year old will have issues making a positive connection to anyone as they grow up. This will result in mental immaturity that often leads to depression and anxiety. This causes the child to not reach their full potential in a human being. They could be an amazing artist, a programmer making the next chip, or a new leader in the free world. The only thing the child will want in their future is how to get that high of having sex (or if they can’t get it, use other means to get the high.)

16
Ricky_CIA 16 points ago +16 / -0

Predditors.

16
mehemson 16 points ago +16 / -0

This has got to be one of the best examples of what reddit is all about. I always tell people reddit is cancer, but now I don't need to explain, I'll just show them this post.

16
Sychinlegacy 16 points ago +18 / -2

Love the “teenagers were married at 14 in the Middle Ages” combined with the “it’s current year we have progressed past the Middle Ages you cultural bigot” double speak from these degenerate fucks.

They don’t care about double standards. They’re nihilists who will say and do anything so long as they get what they want in the end.

3
YaharaRiver 3 points ago +5 / -2

The average age of menses for females rapidly dropped in the 20th century. Just 100 years ago a female didn't reach it until age 16. I imagine that milestone in the middle ages was pushing 20.

All humans are much taller these days as well, both sexes.

3
Sychinlegacy 3 points ago +6 / -3

Assuming that’s true, which I highly highly doubt, what the fuck does that have to do with anything? So now it’s ok to rail a child as long as they hit puberty? Is that the point you’re making?

4
YaharaRiver 4 points ago +4 / -0

No. I'm pointing out how ridiculous it is for pedofiles to presume that the middle ages had millions of 14 yr old brides running around. Life back then was MUCH slower, any idiot understands that.

Children were needed at home for many years before they were married and left home. There was a lot to learn and it WASN'T how to pleasure some fat fuck!

3
DarkDrai 3 points ago +4 / -1

People hit puberty at 16 because of nutrition deficiencies from the Great Depression and the rise of socialism making food scarce. Discounting that historical anomaly, the average age of puberty has been unchanged for thousands of years.

1
YaharaRiver 1 point ago +2 / -1

Then explain how a TEN YEAR OLD got pregnant to me.

0
DarkDrai 0 points ago +3 / -3

That's when girls hit puberty. Always has been.

14
Pepe_longcockings 14 points ago +14 / -0

I have a friend who started sex at 13. I met her when she was 21 and she’d already lost count of the number of dudes she’d banged, somewhere between 150-200 was her guess.

Early sex is a gateway to slutsville

1
The_Emperor 1 point ago +1 / -0

COULD use some action...got her number /s

13
FreedomFlowerDelta 13 points ago +13 / -0

I'm fairly certain that I would be catching an assault/murder charge if my daughter was raped at age 14

13
ClarenceBeeks 13 points ago +13 / -0

Reddit needs to go in a wood chipper

13
Keepidahofree 13 points ago +13 / -0

This shouldn't shock anyone. Porn is free all over the internet. All the media does is obsess over sex. You used to advertise bras on the outside of clothes. Now Victoria's secret is just sex. Men got what they wanted. Free sex with no strings and the dumb feminists just let it happen thinking they were winning. I've known this since I was 14.... I still had sex with men in my life hoping they would love me stupidly like every other woman. I'm going to try really hard to raise my kids different. Society is going to make it really fucking hard.

12
Groundpounder 12 points ago +12 / -0

Also, Reddit: “We’re banning the use of the word, ‘groomer’ from our platform!”

12
plasma 12 points ago +12 / -0

keywords: ex-boyfriend, slut-shaming. this is targeted at girls and their young single mothers. The globohomo needs high promiscuity to destroy families.

12
kmillz 12 points ago +12 / -0

14 is way too young wtf who encourages this shit. Let's encourage a young girl to ruin her education/potential future by risking pregnancy. I know several girls who got pregnant between 14-17 including my own sister. It didn't work out well for them but its ok just because some people "graduated school"?? (wow! good for you)

11
Keiichi81 11 points ago +11 / -0

Reddit is full of pedophiles and groomers.

11
barwhack 11 points ago +11 / -0

Pedophilia was ALWAYS the goal.

11
General_Specific 11 points ago +12 / -1

You don't have to be a Christian to know this kind of shit really pisses off god.

10
cbonez416 10 points ago +10 / -0

Having people figured it out yet. As a computer technician and somebody who learned to code years ago. No I can't code now. But artificial intelligence, sock puppets and fake accounts or what we like to call bots are pretty much talking to these people all day and night. Not all....some of these people are real and they really do believe this shit. But I guarantee you two out of the five comments that somebody gets on Reddit ARE fake. Most likely run by some Chinese click farm or even a Reddit click form. I mean that's what a sock puppet is really. It's a bot created to boost numbers. Now a days AI can interact and talk to you just like a human. If China wanted to confuse and wrapped minds, this would be the way to do it.

1
raptoris 1 point ago +1 / -0

That would require some very capable AI to pull that off. Sometimes even I cannot understand what people are saying, whether for their poor wording/gramma or illogically constructed speech.

3
cbonez416 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's not a very hard AI to create. You don't need feels or emotions. It just has to have reason. Like no matter what never mention china. It's like logic. Something they don't teach in math anymore in this country. If this equals that then this. If a + b = c. You mentioned trump ...Trump is bad ... orange man bad. Simple. It's happening all day long. Best are the click farms that just click on men doing make up on YouTube all day so my boys see that trending and think that's cool. 5 million like. 3 million click bots from china.

1
raptoris 1 point ago +1 / -0

Click bots, those are easily made, but AI with human level conscience is another level. Military is I would argue at the forefront of AI and automation and we have yet to see an operational AI aircraft.

1
ChicomUberAlles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you think cbonez416 was human?

No, you have been talking to my ai bot this entire time!!!

1
CantStumpTheTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like, you can go to amazon, azure, google and sign up for your own account to interact with advanced AI imaging, text, and interpretation services; right now.

https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/cognitive-services/ https://aws.amazon.com/machine-learning/ai-services/

You can go to these cloud providers and rent time a a satellite base station relay to communicate with satellites in orbit my dude....

1
cbonez416 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hedge funds, bankers and money makers on Wall Street use artificial intelligence in their algorithm that can predict and control by emotion and consumer sediment. Basically their algorithm knows the feelings of the consumer at that moment towards a certain product on the market. That's real. And it will lay out algorithms based on that consumer sentiment on how to make billions of dollars. This isn't 20 years from now artificial intelligence this is now. This idea that social media isn't being run by artificial intelligence that reads emotions at that moment that's going on in your environment and then processes that into the social media with a slight let's say bias towards a certain side. It's very possible. And it's real.

10
MythArcana 10 points ago +10 / -0

So glad we moved away from that shithole site.

9
BrianSolo 9 points ago +9 / -0

people make me sick.

9
2008RonPaul2012 9 points ago +10 / -1

Literally a Chinese bot farm

8
Throwaway2022 8 points ago +8 / -0

For the people on here calling these redditors people, you all are misspelling pRedditors.

8
Kekistan_United 8 points ago +9 / -1

and then want us to cover their abortions.

as a natural human right

if these assholes want to be treated like adults, then make them work and pay taxes

kick them out of their parents mansions and see how long they fucking last.

you can be sure, the moment these little retards are meant to be responsible for
their own livelihoods, that they will stop complaining about 'sex shaming'

and complaining more about how they have to cover food and rent AND study to graduate high school

ffs

im not one to wish death on an entire generation, but...

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
7
brundlefly777 7 points ago +7 / -0

You can tell these people are not responsible for anyone or anything in their lives. The rationale for having sex at 14? "It's awesome." You have to laugh... Or, well, you would laugh if these people didn't have their hands on the levers of power in a way...

6
henri_derelicte 6 points ago +6 / -0

Simply stated, these Reddit nutjobs want to lower the age of consent

6
Themis595 6 points ago +6 / -0

There’s no such thing as a woman at 14. That’s a little child. These people are twisted.

6
MrMcGreenGenes 6 points ago +6 / -0

Spread groomers like wood chips.

5
RussianBot6969 5 points ago +5 / -0

14 is too young for sex. Full stop.

5
Razehope 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hedonism is the fall of every nation

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0