1769
Comments (55)
sorted by:
67
yukondave 67 points ago +70 / -3

If you can get over that her face does not move and someone uses an airbrush to put on makeup, she is asking some good questions

43
deleted 43 points ago +44 / -1
20
Viper64 20 points ago +24 / -4

Everything is about the satisfaction of people getting to see your face. It’s so narcissistic. She easily could have just done a voice over showing the facts.

TikTok is such cancer.

19
CrispyQuesoSalami 19 points ago +19 / -0

Social media is cancer. TikTok is just stage 5.

3
BigIronBigIron 3 points ago +3 / -0

You won't find the next Ken Burns on TikTok

9
Pederella 9 points ago +9 / -0

But this isn't for you. This is to reach those with TikTok attention spans and viewing habits. Different weapons for different targets.

20
TheBasedFriscoMan 20 points ago +26 / -6

I could not get past that, nor could I get past the horrible presentation. I got about 2/3rds of the way through, ironically.

41
yukondave 41 points ago +41 / -0

Here is what she was trying to say:

So you have to ask does this have anything to do with Trumps lawsuit that also names the former FBI Director Andrew McCabe.

The first judge assigned was Judge Ryon M. McCabe who eventually recuses himself and replace him with Bruce E Reinhart, who also recused himself and is the one that signed the search warrant last week after Trump filed a motion that he has evidence against Hillary and McCabe?

https://lawandcrime.com/lawsuit/trump-files-massive-lawsuit-against-hillary-clinton-putting-his-theories-of-an-unthinkable-racketeering-plot-against-him-to-the-test/

7
TheBasedFriscoMan 7 points ago +11 / -4

Oh I know what she was saying...just can't stand the way she presented it.

5
wblboo 5 points ago +7 / -2

It is "but, but - those mean tweets" all over again.

1
TheBasedFriscoMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

There’s a right way and a wrong way. Don’t look like a clown with a filter and show the actual documents close up. If she had just shown the docs and did a voice over, more people would watch. So suck a penis, Faggot.

7
deleted 7 points ago +10 / -3
0
Sirbigusdickus 0 points ago +5 / -5

I thought it was a trans.

2
Trump2024 2 points ago +3 / -1

KEK! I came to make a very similar comment and kept twisting it in my head, trying to find nice words so I didn't sound like a libtard hater. It's odd to watch her not moving her top lip and yet making words sound normal. Like a ventriloquist who only perfected half of the act. Botox? Cocaine? Nerve damage?

Whatever the reason she is still thought provoking.

42
remindmelater 42 points ago +42 / -0

So the judge recused himself from the case (because he was biased or other reasons) and then later that same judge issued a search warrant for classified documents at Trumps home (because magically he is no longer biased)....Wow....

9
anotherthing 9 points ago +9 / -0

I believe what she's getting at is that the judge signed the warrant so the FBI could search Trump's house to see if he had anything on McCabe and Hillary. He was on the case where Trump was suing them up until June 22, 2022 when he recused himself, and was on that case since April. So he recuses himself, the Hillary lawyers file a motion to dismiss, Trump's lawyers counter the dismissal, then the judge signs the warrant for the search and the raid occurs.

It's a pretty interesting chain of events and this could be the right answer.

7
yukondave 7 points ago +7 / -0

To be fair, which the other side is not, recusing himself because he has a personal connection with parties in the suit and does not want to have that as seen to influence his view of the case does not mean he is biased against Trump.

3
FluhanWu 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is a great point. Judge could be biased in one case but not another even if both against Trump.

2
yukondave 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly, like what if Judge Ryon McCabe was having sex with FBI Director Andrew McCabe. It has nothing to do with Trump and everything to do with not favouring his lover.

31
Whoopies_tds 31 points ago +33 / -2

There are no coincidences. Given past history, this is very likely true

19
Jammyjams 19 points ago +19 / -0

Yea, this is just another illustration of the absolute corruption we are facing. This is the modern day Stasi.

Anyone surprised? I'm not. We've been seeing shit like this for years now.

18
Sound_ManCO 18 points ago +18 / -0

While all of these are good points there's something being left out of all of these posts about the FBI going in without being monitored. What did they leave there? What electronic eavesdropping equipment was left behind or hidden in his home? What was planted to come after later? Our country is in bad shape and we need DJT to come back and clean house.

12
MawaDeBlanco1 12 points ago +18 / -6

Someone needs to tell these women that lash extensions make them look like a cartoon character.

3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
7
_Sully_ 7 points ago +9 / -2

This would be just another bread crumb for what I was saying earlier. The raid was the result of bait by Trump. Does it have more deeper meaning such as real life evidence against Hillary or is it that Trump just knew that if he made them think that that they'd do something really fuckin' stupid. I'm leading towards the something stupid. This may have been an actual for real 4D chess move. But I bet there is more to it outside of that as well because there are too many people outside his circle stomping their feet. The McCarthy tweet is a strong indication of that.

3
Poopbot3001 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can you explain this in a little more detail? To me, it seems like Trump is going after Clinton and McCabe for planting false evidence and kicking off the fake Russia conspiracy. They were hoping he’d dismiss but when he decided to pursue it is when the raid because he may have taken classified documents” occurs.

I would think he and his lawyers are smart enough to not keep the evidence there. It could also be a long shot attempt to either disqualify him from running again

4
_Sully_ 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm just trying to put the pieces together in my head. At first blush, this all seemed stupid to me. The fact people are saying sorta the same thing and that it's not just republicans but dems too is telling me people knew something was gonna go down. People are pissed, and rightfully so, but this is such a misstep that most should've seen this as theater than an actual act to achieve a big goal by solid unified group. I believe it was a trap to knock some actors out of the game. It was bait by Trump and others to reveal the desperation from those bad actors. I don't think there is really that much of a united front with the DNC or the GOP. I don't doubt the uniparty's existence but I think it's a lot less unified and more of a ill-defined coalition of expediencies that don't overlap all the time.

1
Zelenskyscockholster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct. They're not having secret meetings and planning together or anything, there's just a very obvious "you scratch my back, I scratch yours" mentality. It's very blatant and open and it's obvious they serve their own interests and those that back them more than they do ours. That's what the "uniparty" is.

6
cook_does 6 points ago +6 / -0

She has nailed it.

It all stems from Trumps case with Hillary, where he is suing her. The original judge recused himself from the case, the new judge filed a motion to dismiss the case on 08/04, Trump denied the motion, indicating he wanted to move forward. The activist judge reached out the the original Judge that recused himself, and he then created the warrant to pick up useless national archives garbage that was still sitting in unopened boxes from when they sent it to MAL.

Its just activist judges trying to "fuck Trump"

2
anotherthing 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's an interesting game of chess. I don't think he would have been in the position to sign the warrant if he hadn't recused himself from the prior case. It's not like the judge isn't shady as fuck, going from prosecuting Epstein to being his defense lawyer. It makes sense that them searching through everything to see what Trump had on Hillary would take nine hours. The cover story is that they wanted to make sure the records were secure back in June. It doesn't take nine hours to make sure something is secure. In fact, they even cut the lock securing those records.

5
EvensoAmen 5 points ago +8 / -3

Can't take seriously because I can't look at her. This woman's father or husband needs to correct her.

4
BidensSwollenProstat 4 points ago +5 / -1

Way too many people criticizing the messenger rather than listening to the actual message.

1
Myzlplix 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, they all sound like every leftist when DJT made a tweet.

"I won't listen because hes mean!! REEEEEEEEE!!!!!!"

Guessing they are all lefties pretending to be conservative

0
Sirbigusdickus 0 points ago +3 / -3

It’s called a bag and it needs to go over her head.

5
CoolAsACucumber 5 points ago +5 / -0

Backup Video Link:

https://files.catbox.moe/i02zc1.mp4

Archived Tweet:

https://archive.ph/E0vd6


Also a reminder to use Nitter! There are many web addresses that are less slow than the most commonly used Nitter.net (likely because they go to different servers that are less backed up). For example, nitter.it

Here's a list of all nitter web addresses

https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/wiki/Instances


Try out private messaging apps like Session and Signal and talk to your friends and family about getting them as well so your conversations can remain private.

https://www.privacytools.io/#messaging

2
MIpon2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you for that 👍🏼

5
ENTPP 5 points ago +5 / -0

makes no sense when the "Judge" (in name only) who signed the "warrant" is a rabid trump hater

4
PewPew_ThaDuK 4 points ago +4 / -0

What a fucking scam

4
rextexMG 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ya I think this is likely true. They were fishing big time

4
B_Sack 4 points ago +6 / -2

Where did her upper lip go?

4
grassshrimp 4 points ago +4 / -0

The biased, corrupt judges along with their agency and administrative state counterparts do not have a reason to back down. They are not being prosecuted or held accountable for their misdeeds. Until that happens, nothing changes.

4
Here_we_go 4 points ago +4 / -0

But we are conspiracy theorists. Now stfu and eat these bugs bigot!

2
Powhattan 2 points ago +5 / -3

What is wrong with that lady?

1
Trump2024 1 point ago +2 / -1

Clown world dollar store conservative

2
Qst10nEth1ng 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great info.

2
snoopy3210 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's a civil lawsuit.. but it involves a lot people and criminal activity within Federal agencies... that Trump wants to purge in 2024. This explanation for the raid makes sense.

2
AmericanGuy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I seriously think Trump expected a raid. He wouldn't have put anything in his home.

2
OrangeElvis 2 points ago +5 / -3

Yeah, I will share that when Technofog or Barnes or someone - anyone else - posts it. She is too distracting and would derail most con is about it with ad hominem attacks on her. I will give her full credit for putting those pieces together, though!

2
Conservativechick 2 points ago +2 / -0

Remember that when they raided James O'Keefe, they took private memos from Okeefes lawyers and gave them to the NYT - which is being sued by O'Keefe

2
Oskar 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would hope that any information of this type would be kept in a safe at his attorney's office not in his personal residence.

1
LiteraIIyHitIer 1 point ago +1 / -0

So is this the "woman" all the trannies want to become?

0
partytime71 0 points ago +1 / -1

I guess she thinks that makeup looks good. And I guess she likes tiktok.