3374
Comments (245)
sorted by:
148
-f-b-i- [M] 148 points ago +149 / -1 stickied
300
BillionsAndBillions 300 points ago +300 / -0

Watch them ignore the judge.

183
Keiichi81 183 points ago +184 / -1

Naturally. It's not like they'll face any real consequences anyway.

86
MagaInCali 86 points ago +86 / -0

Like Bongino said on his podcast today, "the department of US" won't do jack shit... to itself.

36
45fan 36 points ago +36 / -0

Department of "Just-Us" is the line

2
OneBigMaga 2 points ago +2 / -0

People still listen to that faux news shill? All they guy does is shill crappy products. Absolutely worst show I ever listened to.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-2
barxe -2 points ago +8 / -10

The Department of JustUs is controlled by the noahide/sanhedrin.. That's how it works in reality.

Mt 26:59, Jn 8:44, Rev 3:9

-1
King5150 -1 points ago +2 / -3

i see Satin's Forskin Loppers are down-dooting hard!.....fucking butthurt fagoots.

56
davidmode 56 points ago +58 / -2

Consequences? Those are for white civilians with right leaning politics

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +6 / -5
7
DrJosephWarren 7 points ago +7 / -0

Why the fuck would you do that?

6
K-Harbour 6 points ago +6 / -0

He did NOT order it unsealed. He ordered them to respond to the motion to unseal. Ching-Ching, many more days for them to file a response, objecting to,the unsealing!! This can go on for months.

A la Mike Flynn!!!

3
tired-of-crap 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is on an expedited calendar. If they try to delay by refusing to respond, the judge will unseal because then it would be an uncontested motion .

Remember, the documents in question are under the control of the court and judge. Once the judge orders the sealed flag removed, everyone will be able to download in pacer, the Federal courts system.

No opportunity for biden to hide the ball.

3
brutustyberius 3 points ago +3 / -0

So then what? Two weeks?

28
jpower 28 points ago +29 / -1

I think it's the same Judge Bruce Reinhart.

Fuck him

1
tired-of-crap 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now that the warrant is served, by law there is no need to be sealed.

1
Standingoak 1 point ago +1 / -0

Something about a speedy trial...............

1
Perhelion 1 point ago +1 / -0

EXACTLY.

7
EatMyBallsAmerican 7 points ago +7 / -0

A stern talking too at best🙄

2
Nothingeverhappens 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah that would be fetch, I don’t honk it’s happening

Edit: can’t type

3
ManOnTheEdge 3 points ago +3 / -0

I mean, who has the authority to do anything to them?

5
BudBurner 5 points ago +5 / -0

Us, it was written in The Constitution.

46
Sea_Still 46 points ago +48 / -2

While screeching no one is above the law!

17
Conspiracytheorist 17 points ago +18 / -1

While continuing with “we can’t talk about an active investigation!”

11
RStroud 11 points ago +11 / -0

They can never give a straight answer about anything and Congress rolls over like a bitch. The appropriate response to evasive or non-answers is to suspend funding until you get an answer. Congress must follow the this fundamental rule: they will not fund what they can not oversee. Period.

6
ShyRipley 6 points ago +7 / -1

Love it.

I would love to see during one of these oversight hearings, the Congressman throwing everything to the wind and getting nitty gritty on whatever Director or whatever is present at the time.

"Sorry that is classified (or we cannot comment on an active investigation etc)"

"Director, let me ask you this: who pays your salary?"

"Our funding comes from blah..."

"Incorrect. We The People pay your salary. Let me ask you this: who do you work for?"

"My department answers to the INSERT AGENCY HERE blah blah..."

"Incorrect! You work for the citizens of The United States of America. Tell me, Director Whatever, the cameras are on, just look into them and explain to your bosses watching right now, The American People, exactly and why so much of what you do should be kept from them when they are the ones paying your salary. Tell them who decides what they are allowed to know, so they can fire that person if they don't agree. Go ahead, we are listening."

I would love to see that.

2
UberPatr10t 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sweet fanfic

3
ThunderSizzle 3 points ago +3 / -0

That would lead to an instant budget surplus.

0
Liberty_Prime 0 points ago +1 / -1

Then fire IRS agents.

2
ExecutiveWoodchipper 2 points ago +2 / -0

They can never give a straight answer because they're all faggots. The whole lot of em

3
VP_Unchained 3 points ago +3 / -0

.. To the public, while snickering up their shirt sleeves

27
Allister 27 points ago +27 / -0

Since he is one in the same Judge that approved it, he has a copy himself to release, seems like he is trying to get out from under the bus with his demand...

4
jonwick 4 points ago +4 / -0

He knew the moment he signed it what was going to happen. They are prepared for this.

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +3 / -2

even he sees what a huge fuck up this was and is trying to avoid the flying shit

12
Stolen 12 points ago +12 / -0

They will release a totally redacted warrant.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
DiscoverAFire 5 points ago +6 / -1

They didn't give him one. They didn't even let his attorney read the whole thing.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
FreeUrsulaHaverbeck 4 points ago +6 / -2

The law requires it, therefore the FBI does it?

3
Allister 3 points ago +3 / -0

They are legally required to provide a copy of the warrant to you.

But, when they have to provide it can vary, read the sample Federal warrant here, and notice the 'Delayed Notice' box the Judge can check that allows them to not provide you a copy of the warrant or receipt of what was taken for a period of up to 30 days, I'm betting that box was checked!

https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/ao093.pdf

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Walt_Kowalski 2 points ago +3 / -1

They are legally required to do a lot of things they don’t do. Commies only respect power. It’s time for real Americans to exercise that power. I’m not sure how, when or where. I’m not some bad ass, I don’t have many means, but I know they won’t relinquish power without being jailed or killed.

1
redboobblueboob 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fucking fucks they are.

1
Kraken_V_Algorithm 1 point ago +2 / -1

Maybe he will after they release first, so he can show what they left out. More 4D chess. And fuck moron Geraldo

8
ultra-tera-maga 8 points ago +8 / -0

Does it even exist?

109
My_dick_screamed 109 points ago +109 / -0

Its content will read "He's a big meanie and left notes in his safe, as we suspected he would, that read "you're all faggots"

43
AE1989 43 points ago +43 / -0

fuckin legend if he did lmao

9
True_Curmudgeon 9 points ago +9 / -0

Bigly

7
x79q3pb 7 points ago +7 / -0

Forced to read out loud on Livestream court case

2
JokerPede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump should store all the mean tweets he would have sent out but can't because Twitter blocked them.. just so when/if this trial happens we can have them all read aloud and entered into the record.

2
T-Bear 2 points ago +2 / -0

It'd be an even bigger legend if PTrump included naked Hunter pics smoking crack with all those notes...

4
DeplorableLA 4 points ago +4 / -0

“Mean tweets. And muh feelings.”

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
90
DaddysHome [S] 90 points ago +90 / -0

First sticky! Just wanted to say FUCK THE FBI... and of course, MAGA!

44
-f-b-i- 44 points ago +44 / -0

But I stickied it

32
DaddysHome [S] 32 points ago +32 / -0

I'm so sorry bb. I love you..

walks away murmers "fuck that bitch."

🤣❤

4
Snipthetipandsip 4 points ago +5 / -1

Such a glowie.

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +4 / -1

the green FBI stickied it

you are the blue FBI

8
-f-b-i- 8 points ago +8 / -0

Fuck the green one

1
brutustyberius 1 point ago +1 / -0

he’s gay.

10
Magabirdlady2 10 points ago +10 / -0

Congratulations 🎉

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
2
TrumpoWon2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good job!

51
RolandDelacroix 51 points ago +51 / -0
  1. He's Orange
  2. He's Bad
12
FuckU/Spez 12 points ago +12 / -0

Come on bruh! Pronouns... Man!

6
DaddysHome [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

But... what is a man?

5
SpicyAmerican 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not a biologist.

1
Amaroq64 1 point ago +1 / -0

He identifies as Orangeman/Orangeself.

1
Canadiapede7 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Wait, are you saying that not only is he an Orange Man, but that he is also Bad? Damn, If only I had known this sooner, my poor brain wouldn't have been corrupted by the alt right and their mind washing powers, REEEEEEE!!" - Some faggot Rino, probably.

33
Allister 33 points ago +33 / -0

As stated in the end of the article, what is up with the DOJ memory holing the judge's page?

https://www.flsd.uscourts.gov/content/judge-bruce-e-reinhart

11
FliesTheFlag 11 points ago +11 / -0

According to archive.org it was changed yesterday, https://web.archive.org/web/20220000000000*/https://www.flsd.uscourts.gov/content/judge-bruce-e-reinhart old pages are still up

here is one at archive.ph incase they nuke the wayback page https://archive.ph/qwHYh

2
PatrickHangry 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was probably due to a fear of doxxing, harassment, death threats, etc. You know, the kind of things they've given conservative Supreme Court Justices absolutely zero help with.

1
Allister 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep, already going into hiding to cover their own asses!

1
Sick_of_the_bs 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's what caught my eye the most. Why was he pulled from their registry? Were too many people calling him names?

1
seismic 1 point ago +1 / -0

The entirety of the FL court system and their web team covering for the dirty judge. Its a great look. I wonder if defendants get the same kind of protection. Oh probably not. Rank and file.

25
GeorgeWTrump 25 points ago +25 / -0

It’ll be one big redacted black paragraph with “Trump Bad” the only thing eligible

21
Rusty_Bungus 21 points ago +21 / -0

Any legal experts care to chime in on whether it's legal to not share the search warrant or to play the game of "HERE IT IS!" from 100 yards away?

5
MasklessMarvel 5 points ago +6 / -1

they must provide a copy of the warrant which specifies the places and items to be searched

i doubt Melania's underwear drawer was listed

3
jonwick 3 points ago +3 / -0

Cops aren't stupid. The almost always have some sort of small object listed somewhere in the what to search for portion of the warrant which would allow them to search anywhere in the residence where that object could be. If they were after documents, you could easily say a post-it is a document or a torn piece of paper. Both of which would fit in Malanias underwear drawers I imagine.....

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +2 / -1

that's going to depend on the judge

in reality, judges tread very carefully when it comes to warrants because fucking them up can bite them in the ass

politics aside, this judge knows Trump is not to be fucked with

2
Rusty_Bungus 2 points ago +2 / -0

...and if they don't or didn't, what is the legal recourse?

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +2 / -0

there is no legal recourse needed

everything they find is inadmissible as it violates the 4A

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

0
beansieman1911 0 points ago +1 / -1

Doesn't matter if you are not subject to the enforcement of the law.

14
deleted 14 points ago +15 / -1
5
Krork 5 points ago +5 / -0

has he even responded about this at all ?

1
chickeninoven 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, this order is only for them to respond to the request, not an order to show the warrant.

0
MasklessMarvel 0 points ago +1 / -1

no, no one has claimed responsibility

3
BigMikeHung 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank God that faggot was blocked from becoming a SCOTUS Justice

13
PM_ME_UR_VIVOZ 13 points ago +14 / -1

We have no response, and if you unseal it, you’re in trouble.

Their response. Plz Venmo me, time traveling is expensive.

4
TrumpoWon2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

What's a vivoz and how can I send it?

If you're looking for my wife's hooch you'll new disappointed cause that's only for me.

2
PM_ME_UR_VIVOZ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Heh, it’s an old ccj joke. If you know, you know.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
DeplorableLA 11 points ago +11 / -0

Good. Call me snarky or whatever, if in fact there was a source that tipped off the FBI, I hope they were setting them up. Because if anyone deserves it, they do. Thus far they look pretty silly, desperate, and like thugs.

14
DaddysHome [S] 14 points ago +14 / -0

I haven't had respect for the FBI or CIA since they conspired to and killed JFK.. and I wasn't even born yet.

7
FutureVRPilot 7 points ago +7 / -0

I have 7 Days of newspapers from the Oakland Tribune one of the articles held a professional gun officer holding up Lee Harvey allswell's rifle saying the site wasn't properly cited to the weapon that he couldn't hit anything that was the last time that little page was ever seen again

6
DeplorableLA 6 points ago +6 / -0

I was around then, my parents were convinced that LBJ played a significant role. Agree with you, the alphabets were involved as well.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
MasklessMarvel 4 points ago +4 / -0

Call me snarky or whatever,

you are snarky or whatever

2
DeplorableLA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh no! Are those my pronouns now?

2
HumanSomewhere 2 points ago +2 / -0

That would be hilarious.

10
Jackhererer 10 points ago +11 / -1

So the judge who signed the warrant is granting the motion to unseal the warrant. I'm a little shocked tbh

22
PlatinumFMorgan 22 points ago +22 / -0

"granting the motion to unseal the warrant."

No, the judge is asking the DOJ to respond to the motion.

4
Jackhererer 4 points ago +4 / -0

My mistake. Thanks for correction.

6
Jappletime 6 points ago +6 / -0

So can we get a look at the agents on camera when they were all in Melania’s wardrobe room. I sure it was a very entertaining video of them looking through her drawers.

4
Crappydatum 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm guessing Trump doesn't have security cameras in his wife's wardrobe. Wouldn't want the guards walking around with extra "Billy clubs".

1
80960KA 1 point ago +1 / -0

While I assume Trumps have big walk-in closets I doubt Melania dresses herself in them.

-3
MasklessMarvel -3 points ago +1 / -4

you don't know what kind of kinky games they play

1
T-Bear 1 point ago +1 / -0

An old-style faggoty panty raid.

Of course, that's simply assuming she wear panties....

4
DontDoxMeBro1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia Russia PUTIN

4
PhantomShield72 4 points ago +4 / -0

BREAKING: Hawaiian Judge overrules that Judges order.

2
T-Bear 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's still around!

Haven't heard from that faggot in a while!

Hawaiian judge, still trying to be relevant!

4
spinometer 4 points ago +4 / -0

the upside is that now the next president can raid the bidens, clintons, and bushes

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
OH_Mike_Oxbig 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have it already, here it is...

███████████████████████ ███████ █████ █████████

████████████████████████████████████

██████████████████████████████████████████

██████████████████████████████

██████████████████████████████████████████

█████████████████████████████████████████

█████████, █████████

4
flyingeagleusa 4 points ago +4 / -0

The Florida Judge who ordered it was responding to Judicial Watch motion. I as a subscriber to JW I congratulate Tom Fintton and sending him another (tax deductible) Donation.. If only we can get this on his front page newsletter Fuck Joe Biden

4
MAK90 4 points ago +4 / -0

"In that event, the Government shall file a redacted Response in the public record"

Don't expect anything of substance.

3
akira2501 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the judicial equivalent of: "Guys, you're making my court look bad. Do something. Please."

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +3 / -1

“The response may be filed ex parte and under seal as necessary to avoid disclosing matters already under seal. In that event, the Government shall file a redacted Response in the public record. If it chooses, the Government may file a consolidated Response to all Motions to Seal,”

IOW, they have to cough it up for the lawyers but can redact things already under seal from the public's copy

2
jonwick 2 points ago +2 / -0

And the judge can and most likely will order them not to talk

0
MasklessMarvel 0 points ago +1 / -1

that does not really matter

they can use it as ammo in court

3
BigMikesFBIBootyRaid 3 points ago +3 / -0

he should just say all of his documents are stored on hunter's laptop

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +4 / -1

“Nobody at the White House was. Nobody was given a heads up and we did not know about what happened yesterday.”

tl;dr Merrick Garland is now running the country

3
mass55th 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's the same fucking corrupt Judge that signed the search warrant. Trying to cover his ass.

2
finscreenname 2 points ago +2 / -0

Rats are leaving a sinking ship...

3
mega-maga 3 points ago +3 / -0

the warrant is worthless they didn't raid to find something specific... they raided to look for or plant shit

-1
MasklessMarvel -1 points ago +1 / -2

if they did not provide the lawyer a copy it is worthless anyway

3
borntacticool 3 points ago +3 / -0

Makes you wonder if their "witness" was Cassidy Hutchinson.

2
NotTheCIADonotWorry 2 points ago +3 / -1

Can we stop with the links to news that want me to enter information to veiw

1
DaddysHome [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's an archived link, sorry.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +2 / -1

yes, we can stop it if you will just provide your full name, social security number and date of birth

2
NotTheCIADonotWorry 2 points ago +2 / -0

How about i give you a 3d scan of my face and the interior of my house along with my finger prints and map of my colon?

-1
MasklessMarvel -1 points ago +0 / -1

we can skip the colon map.

thanks anyway

3
NotTheCIADonotWorry 3 points ago +3 / -0

That part is nonnegotiable now you must also take an autographed box set of the new star wars trilogy on 4k bluray in adition

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +1 / -0

okay we'll stop

we'll stop

2
Magabirdlady2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do we know the name of the judge because I’m not giving in my email to find out. Thanks

-2
MasklessMarvel -2 points ago +1 / -3

Do we know the name of the judge

It's Your Honor

2
Azill 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let's see if they actually follow it. They already said they werent gonna release it before.

2
HumanSomewhere 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gave them five days to rifle through what they seized to find some justification

2
Crappydatum 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64872441/united-states-v-sealed-search-warrant/

Yes, the same judge who signed warrant issued this 5 day notice to the DOJ to cover their azzes.

The "warrant" will come back totally blacked out

2
MajorClark 2 points ago +2 / -0

The DOJ must be defunded for abuse of power. They are a democrat Clinton run machine.

2
VirTW 2 points ago +2 / -0

They caught Trump with a doctored weather map!

2
webthing 2 points ago +2 / -0

What a time to be alive.

2
ThirteenPercenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is it at all typical for warrants to be sealed?

7
Allister 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yes, but generally only before they are executed so that it stays secret, once executed they are generally unsealed automatically as a copy is given to the 'suspect' then and there...

1
Overkillengine 1 point ago +1 / -0

if they are given a copy.

1
SacredBandOfPedes 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is what I was wondering....couldn't President Trump release the warrant to the public himself, since he was the one that I assume is the subject of the warrant?

1
Turdburglerturdburg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes he can release it.

0
MasklessMarvel 0 points ago +1 / -1

otherwise they are obligated to provide the suspect with a copy of the warrant

2
SouthSideBagMan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why have I thought Merrick Garland was black?

3
deletedandreacted 3 points ago +3 / -0

What if you were told his family name was previously Garfinkel? Does that sound black?

2
FormerGraveheart 2 points ago +2 / -0

Art Garfunkel is black, though, right?

1
panic86 1 point ago +1 / -0

Whoopi Goldberg thinks so

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +2 / -1

i thought he was in Wizard of Oz

1
SouthSideBagMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Turns out he’s just a queer

2
Ladybug87 2 points ago +2 / -0

Isn't Bruce Reinhardt also the judge who signed off on the raid?

1
Crappydatum 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes

2
sgt_richard 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you have nothing to hide...

1
anonymous_leotard 1 point ago +1 / -0

“On or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on August 15, 2022, the Government shall file a Response to the Motion to Unseal,”

3
FlyCatcher94 3 points ago +3 / -0

“ we’re not going to unseal it.”

1
AbrahamLincoln 1 point ago +1 / -0

"or else I will be forced to send another request"

1
Rerecursive 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pedo judge isn't granting anything, just pretending. It'll all be sealed

1
SamQuentin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Impeach 46

1
FLCracker1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Since this happened in FL, How about Ron DeSantis demand a copy and declassify it. The FBI (is asshoe) has to register with Palm Beach PD, so they have a copy

1
AmericaFirstMAGA88 1 point ago +1 / -0

They will decline because they're above the law and elections are rigged so they stand 0 chance of repercussions

1
OmegaBird 1 point ago +1 / -0

They will unseal it when they have created it and doctored it up.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
flyingeagleusa 1 point ago +1 / -0

Two more weeks "Responses due by 8/24/2022" plenty of time for cover ups..Fuck Joe Biden

1
wethepepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m old enough to remember the establishment and bureaucrats just ignoring a direct instruction from GEOTUS to declass

I’m sure they’ll be right on this kek

1
Pdjco658 1 point ago +1 / -0

They used a judge eqs they knew they could dupe with bogus claims

1
Fullstackweebdev 1 point ago +1 / -0

Place your bets! Will they refuse, "lose" it or manufacture one to save themselves?

-1
MasklessMarvel -1 points ago +1 / -2

it would be stupid to manufacture a warrant and present it to the judge who signed the original warrant

1
Fullstackweebdev 1 point ago +1 / -0

The judge who hates Trump and was an Epstein supporter? Yeah he's definitely not corrupt

0
MasklessMarvel 0 points ago +1 / -1

epstein supporter?

anyway, no judge is going to put his ass on the line by signing off on something he provably knows is a lie

1
Hardworkingdude 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tyrants rein always come to an end. You’ll see.

1
AbrahamLincoln 1 point ago +1 / -0

It says: "ORANGE MAN BAD"

1
Boom2cannon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hate to be that guy - but who gives a shit? The rogue government does whatever the rogue government wants to do. They won’t be unsealing shit.