Comments (202)
sorted by:
McFatty7 150 points ago +151 / -1

All the tech companies donating to Democrats.

Surprise surprise.

Those “donations “ are probably the only thing keeping Democrat lawmakers from breaking up Big Tech.

General_Specific 71 points ago +71 / -0

Most "big tech" would never have been successful without crooked politicians and coke money. Silicon valley was funded with mountains of coke. I do not have a source; I grew up in silicon valley and have known more than a handful of what we now call elite billionaires. Many were still doing coke in the early 2000s and many told me stories about how the industry never would have been possible without drug money.

KrellKrypto 26 points ago +26 / -0

Funny how you can have all the money and power in the world and still be nothing more then a drug addict like the rest of us

refresco 18 points ago +18 / -0

Even for the average non-rich guy starting a tech company. A little Adderall goes a long way when you are already willing to put in 18 hour days and just want more out of the time. A good portion of engineers and engineering students I've met have used "performance enhancing drugs" at one point or another during college. As one said, "I got my EE thanks to caffeine, nicotine, and amphetamines." Drugs are all over tech at every level, it's no different than a lot of other industries, just more disposable income on average.

KrellKrypto 12 points ago +14 / -2


I take adderal for adhd meds.

Have earned over 10 professional IT and software dev certs in the last 6 months

Your not wrong

canttouchdis 9 points ago +9 / -0

democrats definition of "protecting elections"" is "doing everything in their power to make sure that people vote Democrat"

Testosteroneape2000 4 points ago +4 / -0

Does it make your mind sharper or something?

KrellKrypto 4 points ago +4 / -0

It’s basically meth.

Turns up your processing power.

freebass 1 point ago +2 / -1

Ewww, ditch the meth (Adderall) and get Modafinil.

It's a nootropic, non habit forming, and has very few interactions with other meds.

I like it over Adderall because my mind is sharp, but I'm not all "speedy methy" feeling. The come down for me on Adderall requires at least 6 beers.

Modafinil is great and no wacky comedown or issues sleeping.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
bigdickhangsright 1 point ago +1 / -0

This guy learned to code

KrellKrypto 5 points ago +6 / -1

Humans are not made to look at numbers. We are made to look at words.

I think that is a big part of it. You don’t need addy to read a novel, you kinda do to read a math textbook at the same page per min rate lol

refresco 5 points ago +5 / -0

The increased focus helps with anything. Ever crammed for an exam. Take this pill and that same study time now gets you an A instead of a low B because you were actually paying attention to the material the whole time. It's never been my thing, but I can definitely see the appeal. If I wasnt well aware of my addictive personality I'd probably have used it as a means to an end at some point.

justmadethisacc7725 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know plenty of people who are more numerically inclined than linguistically. They usually end up being engineers or math guys. Makes sense.

KrellKrypto 1 point ago +1 / -0

But they don’t communicate with numbers.

They don’t say 100101010 to say hello.

That was more my point.

We are wired to need abstraction to understand. A computer simply needs numbers to understand

Delphi373 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've worked with a few PhD Neuroscientists & Physicists and they're all big into the performance enhancing drugs as well. They love that sh*t.

Fake_Snooze 3 points ago +4 / -1

Stop using Twitter and Facebook!

General_Specific 2 points ago +2 / -0

What makes you think I have either? wtf...

mysweetaudrina 3 points ago +3 / -0

and they are so pathetic they still have to cheat.

WhitePhoenix 2 points ago +2 / -0

Section 230.

Sylvester1212 2 points ago +2 / -0

George Bush and his minions.

Standingoak 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bush the Elder was a King Pin for the agency .

Bush the dumber was just a user dealer.

deleted 16 points ago +20 / -4
the_pragmaticist 30 points ago +30 / -0

The club is much more attractive when you’re a member.

Jammyjams 29 points ago +29 / -0

Because they've left God. They think they're God or should be.

This is what is coming next. The Transhuman movement, mRNA, robotic limbs, brain chips.

Listen the Harari or Klaus Faggot. This is their 4th industrial revolution. They are all on board, which will give Silicon Valley and the corporations unimaginable power. This is why they're in bed together. Their interests align.

It is evil. Harari even said Christ is "fake news". These people are Satan's army.

Standingoak 6 points ago +6 / -0

They think they're God or should be.

SUPREMACISTs aim to rule ----by any means necessary

Psychopaths just the new term for the Greek's DemiGods

WhitePhoenix 4 points ago +4 / -0

robotic limbs

I hate to be the AKSHULLY guy, but what's wrong with robotic limbs? We have a sizable chunk of veterans who lost their limbs in war and are disabled because of it. They are ideal candidates for these to get some of their function back for their lives.

Do you mean prosthetics people might use to replace perfectly working limbs with "cybernetically enhanced" ones?

Jammyjams 4 points ago +4 / -0

No, you're not wrong. These things could really be used for a ton of good. But the people at the helm will certainly use it in a harmful way.

Everything they do is to control human behavior. Look what facebook turned into. They ALWAYS use technology for evil because they are evil. These people really do worship Satan, Molech, and Ba'al, etc. They use it to play God.

Those robotic limbs might need to be connected to a central chip in your brain, which controls your behavior. Robotic limbs could definitely be used for good, especially for vets who've been injured. I just don't trust them whatsoever to use it innocently and purely for goodness.

WhitePhoenix 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're not wrong either. It's a catch 22 situation for vets unfortunately.

Jammyjams 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do see a place in which there is some sort of review committee for vets who need these devices. There must be proper oversight on technology.

What we've seen with censorship and silicon valley is fucking sickening. Hopefully things will get done when MAGA comes in.

Correndo 26 points ago +26 / -0

You get these ratios when out of touch techies that have very little interaction outside their bubble have a myriad of strange, borderline illegal evaluations and tests, and "team interviews" to slectively hire new people.

Source: Worked for an optics company that's legitmately revoloutionizing optics technology. I left because of the contracts with Google and Facebook (before Meta).

They forgot to make me sign an NDA. 😁

They were developing optics for what we now know as the Metaverse, and Google is still secretly working on Google Glass.

telan 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oh are they really now? I remember when those stupid things were released for the first time. I also remember the term invented for the idiots who wore them and acted like asshats in public.

Correndo 8 points ago +8 / -0

Google Glass was rightly rejected by the public, but they were ahead of their time.

Now that AR is a thing thanks to games like Pokemon Go, eyewear like Google Glass can make a comeback if it's marketed under AR. I predict it will make a comeback for gamers and government agencies.

Gaming is being used to sneak in some seriously alarming government and corporate powers the general public doesn't know about yet, like monitoring play styles, voice recordings, etc. to build detailed psychological profiles for marketers, and "marketers" if you catch my drift.

Freedom requires eternal vigilance a very wise man once said.

Edit: Btw, what were the Glass wearers called again? I completely forgot. It was years ago and so short lived.

GorillaTactics 3 points ago +3 / -0

Glassholes. Interesting information you bring out…

telan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good thing I don't play stuff online (except 76) and don't have a mic or cam attached to my computer. That's probably the least I can do...but yeah I have heard of companies building profiles so they can make lifelong addicted spenders out of sheep.

Wow, I thought it would stick in the lexicon for a while. They were called "glassholes".

KAGMAGIC2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

How good are the optics? Also if you didnt sign an NDA you can literally blast whatever you know. Anything juicy for stocks? Edit: not sure if thats insider info

Meddlesom 12 points ago +12 / -0

The rich people in silicon valley are not the innovators and inventors... they are the corporate fat cat bureaucrats. They are the Bill Gates and Steve Jobs. They are the ones who steal the innovations and inventions and sell them to the world and make all the money from it.

So when we see these donations, it's mostly coming from the top assholes with "fuck you!" money. Everyone else is too busy struggling to feed their family under the DNC's crushing economy to be able to donate money to any campaigns.

mark2398 7 points ago +7 / -0

If you are in Big Tech, the Democrats do things like hire 87K IRS agents to make sure you never have any competition from a small start up company.

1776timesinfinity 7 points ago +9 / -2

This graph doesn't represent tech companies donating to political parties. It represents employees of those companies, who are almost uniformly highly educated and residents of major cities and would be expected to be largely Democrats regardless of who their employers are.

WhitePhoenix 3 points ago +3 / -0

That is a problem to begin with. though as these employees are the ones who manipulate the algorithms and shit to intentionally censor our views.

Newuser99 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm a software engineer in big tech. Most everyone is a pronoun faggot

1776timesinfinity 0 points ago +2 / -2

This has nothing to do with what I said. I'm correcting the misconception that this graph is a record of corporate donations.

sully 1 point ago +1 / -0

This. I know for a fact that if it were the companies and not employees, the numbers for a few of these companies would be a bit different.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1776timesinfinity -1 points ago +2 / -3

you’d be fired as soon as a woke coworker looked you up and saw that you donated to a Republican.

If that's true, can you explain why employees of each company listed made donations to the Republican Party?

GorillaTactics 2 points ago +2 / -0

A plausible explanation is that those few are in positions that are relatively immune to that petty behavior for now. Certain management or very difficult to fill position. Only speculating

1776timesinfinity -1 points ago +1 / -2

I mean, it's not as plausible as the idea that there is simply a small minority of Republican donors working throughout tech companies who assume no one's going to bother looking up their political donations and are aware it would be illegal to fire them on their basis.

Thrasymachus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Illegal, oh no! That'll definitely stop them.

1776timesinfinity -2 points ago +1 / -3

Yes, it will. Firing people for illegal reasons is an incredibly easy case to win. Can you cite any instance of it happening?

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1776timesinfinity -3 points ago +1 / -4

Can you find an example of anyone in the US being fired for donating to the Republican Party?

Krork 3 points ago +3 / -0

they get 10 times that money back from the goverment. guess who pays for it ? you are paying for your own destruction at this point sadly. i think to secede is the only way forward without either civil war or slavery.

refresco 2 points ago +2 / -0

It makes sense. All the huge tech companies are located in very liberal areas. Most liberals in tech agree with their views. Almost all the conservative tech bros I know got out of the city or started their own businesses doing consulting.

IncredibleMrE1 28 points ago +28 / -0

Preboooonking is back on the menu, boys!

JesusisKing 24 points ago +24 / -0

does anyone really care besides the braindead leftists who already only use twitter?

BMCKid 1 point ago +2 / -1

Thats my thing. Like 10 pactual people use twitter tho...

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
Heatbeam 15 points ago +15 / -0

So, they're going to 'reinforce' the farce.

Reminds me of this, a lot:

"The handshake between business and labor was just one component of a vast, cross-partisan campaign to protect the election–an extraordinary shadow effort dedicated not to winning the vote but to ensuring it would be free and fair, credible and uncorrupted."



c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 14 points ago +14 / -0

I'm honestly shocked that some of those are as red as they are.

anewpatriot 5 points ago +5 / -0

I was thinking the same thing. Intel and Uber really surprised me!

ThatsDoable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hate to break it to you but that Red bar is going straight to the RINOs.

orange_dit 2 points ago +2 / -0

A lot of engineers are based.

telan 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn't expect Apple to be as high as they are or Tesla to be as low as they are. I did expect Tesla to be higher than frickin Amazon.

AOCDickPics 13 points ago +13 / -0

To be expected TBH.

I'm surprised they're even announcing it.

I also think it's very difficult for them to have an impact on midterms. Too much going on at once.

They're going to be defending someone from Las Vegas or something and you're gonna be like who the fuck is that?

SendCCPToHell 7 points ago +7 / -0

do people still use twitter? thought it was just bots.

the_neon_cowboy 7 points ago +7 / -0

What you want to bet the RED is mostly going to be the RINO's

YaharaRiver 3 points ago +3 / -0

I fold.

You win. They absolutely ARE.

Dylan_da_Spider 7 points ago +7 / -0

Just wondering, why is it that companies are allowed to donate to political parties and election campaigns?

Getcucked2 12 points ago +12 / -0

This post specifically references employee donations, so this is data on employees of twitter's personal donations -- this is not a company PAC as far as this infograph suggests

deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
lixa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good point

Dylan_da_Spider 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ahh that makes a lot more sense, thanks.

Whoopies_tds 2 points ago +2 / -0

PAC, they are buying influence for favorable treatment of whatever they selling.... in other words a bribe

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
JackOfDiamonds 6 points ago +7 / -1

Stupid boomer Republicans have been sleeping on the internet long enough. When we take both houses of Congress and the White House in '24, it is long past time to ruthlessly crack down on social media with an iron fist, utterly enforcing free speech and open source algorithms to prevent any scale tipping with regard to what posts get broadcast to what audiences. If any companies are found attempting to influence elections by showing swing voters more leftist content than conservative (and let's be honest, the problem will never be in the other direction,) their execs go to fucking prison.

EdmondDantesDog 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hopium is one hellavaa drug...Elon can't even buy Twitter lol

SigSauer1776 5 points ago +5 / -0

What about Netflix?

Jack_Dupp 5 points ago +5 / -0

That’s not Twitter’s province, so they can fuck right off. Instead EACH STATE is responsible for “protecting” the integrity of its respective elections this midterm, and always.

South_Florida_Guy 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's not their fucking place to be involved.

deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
America_No_1 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is how the inner cities did it. Screened who their candidates voted for before deciding to hire or fire. Slowly you only have like minded Democrats in charge and no way for a Republican to even get hired. They do this with CCW's in blue cities too. You donated or know a Dem in charge? You get your CCW. Voted for the opposition? You get delayed and ignored or denied forever.

LolOkFBI 3 points ago +3 / -0

What a beautiful, public list of complicit corporations

1776timesinfinity 3 points ago +3 / -0

This isn't a list of corporate political donations.

YaharaRiver 1 point ago +1 / -0

YES. Gives one pause, doesn't it.

cantrememberpassword 3 points ago +3 / -0

How does GOP make any money if the big money employees are all funding Democrat?

CommunismIsForLosers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Caving on dem legislation gives them kickbacks.

texas4ever 3 points ago +3 / -0

Looking at the chart it really shows the power of rich people. One super rich person could easily donate more than all the employees at several huge corporations. Yes technically they can't but they can indirectly.

GodIsPerfect 3 points ago +3 / -0

Same chart for the pedophile ratio at the company.

Groundpounder 3 points ago +3 / -0

Again?!? Shocking! !

Womb___Raider 2 points ago +2 / -0

In other words, take down any post that exposes Democrats and let people lie to their hearts content about Republicans.

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
Correndo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those ratios are really, really unusual for the type of businesses they are - even netflix.

Foletado 2 points ago +2 / -0


News at the Daily Caller

In short, they announced that they are going to erase evidence of election fraud and promote the tweeters they want.

People at TheDonald should know better than to promote Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, Amazon by putting content there exclusively, using them as primary platforms, or linking to them and sending traffic to them unnecessarily.

We need a moderation system which only shows links to those platforms after review to ensure that they are not frivolous.

The Twitter alternative which is most free by design is
ActivityPub federated microblogging

Truth Social and Gab copied software for ActivityPub microblogging and crippled it by removing the federation feature. The goal of that is to create a more captive user base. Don't let yourself be treated like livestock. Join any of hundreds of free, networked, ActivityPub microblogging servers.

Infrastructure for integrity of government, elections, society: Wiki, Chat, More.

WildRanter 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've been in tech my whole life. Honestly, there's no technical reason for all the suck we get from this industry except for the amount of blue in this chart. If we get rid of these communist slackers I can guarantee you at least we'd have decent and honest software.

DonAlejoGarzaTamez 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who effing cares. 90% of Twitter's traffic comes from bots.

idrago01 2 points ago +2 / -0

haha look at netflix and we’re wondering why no one wants to watch any of their shows

EinhornisFinkle 2 points ago +2 / -0

Learn to Fortify or lose. Their slogan for 2020 was "By ANY means necessary", and they fucking meant it. imagine conservatives had that amount of dedication.

Is there a lawyer's Guild set up to help defend conservative protesters? Is there crowdfunding to help defend regular people? ...

sustainable_saltmine 2 points ago +2 / -0

basically companies should be forbidden from making political donations. Of course then there's nothing stopping the leadership from doing it on their own as private people...even if there's a max donation limit, they'll just launder the money through intermediaries and still donate the same amount just under the names of other people in small amounts each

1776timesinfinity 1 point ago +2 / -1

basically companies should be forbidden from making political donations.

This graph does not contain information about political donations by companies.

Edial 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm sick of how backwards this shit all is. The country would flourish 1 million % if it were solid red.

PackingHeat 1 point ago +1 / -0

This time around they aren't going to be nearly as effective. Social media has diversified and election fraud has been front and center, and will be more difficult to steal.

HotPropGun 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kudos to whomever put this "don't spend your money with these fuckers" list.

Stable_Genius84 1 point ago +1 / -0

Elon Musk? The self proclaimed Republican? His company is donating overwhelmingly to democrats? Imagine that.

infeststation 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is what their employees donated, not Twitter. People have a right to donate to whichever party, campaign they want. This money is not what’s influencing elections.

TheSuperStableGenius 1 point ago +1 / -0

The 2.3% are Liz cheney, mitt Romney and Adam kinzinger

angryamerican1964 1 point ago +1 / -0

These people are asking for it

theneverman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look how based Intel is. - a tick and a half under 8 in 10. Wow. Madness.

brundlefly777 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't think in terms of legal or illegal with these people anymore. They don't think in those terms.

It's friend or foe.

TheRealTurdFurgeson 1 point ago +1 / -0

There should be NO conservatives on Twitter. Anyone with a twitter account is not MAGA. That is the final straw.

Bullet3250 1 point ago +1 / -0

Need to fax them this...

mickusa1 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Protect” Hi we are from the government- we are here to “help” your elections...

vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even though Intel is still vastly outnumbered, how much do you want to bet that their working environment is so much more sane because liberals know that at least a few people around them won't accept all their insanity.

buckiemohawk 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they broke up big tech it would be amazing. The propaganda machine would be stopped

JoeBidensDementia1 1 point ago +1 / -0

What steps?

How does Twitter protect anything? No one is actually on there.

BumpForTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anyone still on Twitter is retarded. Period. Masochist.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
CucumberExtract 1 point ago +1 / -0

Would be a shame if some white hat hacker managed to take down twitter that whole week.

Observe95 1 point ago +1 / -0

Will this finally get conservative pundits to leave Twitter?

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
AdeleB 1 point ago +1 / -0