2508
Tone down the Rhetoric guyz! (media.patriots.win) 💩   SHITPOST   💩
posted ago by Alice_is_Tired ago by Alice_is_Tired +2512 / -4
Comments (127)
sorted by:
75
NvJohansson 75 points ago +75 / -0

Obama started this bs.

51
IncredibleMrE1 51 points ago +52 / -1

Bill Ayers started the Weather Underground. He mentored Obama.

14
Kvetch_Detector 14 points ago +15 / -1

This shit started with the Federal Reserve, and got exponentially worse over time.

The 16th and 19th Amendments fucked us BAD. Same goes for all the government agencies following WWII.

11
dr_gonzo 11 points ago +11 / -0

 ☝️This guy gets it.

Lenin said that the establishment of a central banking monopoly was 90% of communizing a country. Of course it's listed in Communism's 10 Core Planks, as is the progressive income tax, which coincidentally was imposed on the U.S. the exact same year the Federal Reserve Act was passed. Strange coincidence huh?

It should come as no surprise that when you create Marxist mechanisms in your government, you wind up with Marxism.

6
King5150 6 points ago +6 / -0

Protocols of the Elders of Zion are becoming reality. The Jews did everything they could to make the world believe this was a fake document by branding them as conspiracy nuts and antisemitic....but they are true and rapidly coming to pass.

2
80960KA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Communism has always been a banker/oligarch scam.

2
justmadethisacc7725 2 points ago +2 / -0

Central banks are older than communism

4
Raphael300 4 points ago +4 / -0

Federalism. Thanks Lincoln.

3
BrandonD47 3 points ago +4 / -1

We lost the Civil War to international bankers in the 1860's and they smeared us as being racists who wanted to own slaves, a common tactic, calling their enemies evil racists who hated them for no reason whatsoever. When in fact, almost zero White Americans ever owned any slaves, it was all the same group who brought them here, and then owned all the slave farms, then used Hollywood movies to brainwash everyone into believing a false story of history.

We have been under Communist rule ever since, brainwashed far more than the N. Korean's ever were, to the point I realize there's no way to wake up the masses on what I've learned about the past 200 years.

Seek Jesus Christ for the salvation of your souls guys, these people who are planning on killing us are worshipping the devil and wearing sheeps clothing and I can't even post the verses that expose them because I'll be banned, that's how bad things are.

You know them though, you know who's doing this to us. You know Garland's real last name. You know what Epstein's background is and what that Island was for. Warn everyone around you that you can, and urge them to read the Gospels, read the book of Romans, we all are probably going to be killed so save your souls by turning to Jesus Christ.

1
Marshall2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you know most "Plantations" in the South would be called shacks today. I bet you don't picture that when you think about a plantation.

1
Marshall2 1 point ago +1 / -0

The SWAMP. Federal MASTERS. TYRANNY.

Thanks Lincoln.

3
RStroud 3 points ago +3 / -0

This started before we preserved the union by killing people from states that wanted to no longer be in the union. The federalists had noble ideals but all the fears of the anti-federalists began to be realized the moment the ink was dry on the constitution.

2
HoganP 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lincoln paved the way for progressivism, though. Crossed the Rubicon into rationalizing extra and unconstitutional liberties being taken by the federal government with no legal basis other than people felt it needed to be done.

We were doomed to what we are experiencing now and whatever it leads to because Lincoln decided he could raise an army and invade sovereign states without a declaration of war because he and others sought to preserve the union...A principle that exists nowhere in the constitution (and still doesn't) but compelled people at the time, just like the right to an abortion or transgender rights compel many today, at the risk of putting too fine a point on it.

When you make it up as you go, no matter how justified you think you are, don't be surprised when others make it up as they go down the line.

2
RStroud 2 points ago +2 / -0

Part of the "making up" is Marbury v. Madison and the court taking upon itself to riddle the Constitution with virtually unreviewable insane adhoc footnotes. The supreme court is variously asleep, imperious, or impotent depending on what is useful to the federal government in the moment. So, we somehow went from needing to create a constitutional amendment to do things like enact taxes or prohibit alcohol, to needing an Act of Congress, to executive fiat by administrative law, to no one has standing to question the federal government.

2
HoganP 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree. The founders were acutely sensitive to the natural tendency of power to consolidate and went to great pains to safeguard against it.

From the signing of the constitution to the inception of the major parts of the new deal was, what 125 years? In the grand scheme that's lickety split. 125 years, a civil war, a world war, and a depression was all it took.

1
Marshall2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Federalists were NEVER NOBLE.

2
HoganP 2 points ago +2 / -0

And 17th. And it started before WW2 with the new deal. All of that.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
10
BidensPrisonWallet 10 points ago +11 / -1

And Big Mike drove it home. Hard.

4
MemeToDeath2021 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've had it guys. I'm gonna do it!


Time to grab some popcorn and "Meme the Fuck" out of the FBI. See if you can raise some bail money for me when I end up in FBI's "Special" Solitary Confinement for Dangerous Domestic Memers.

https://patriots.win/p/15JAXl2BHg/the-real-danger-to-our-republic-/c/

https://patriots.win/p/15JAXl2jRs/fbi-agents-right-now/c/

https://patriots.win/p/15JAXl2SSw/tfw-fbi-is-ordered-to-raid-miche/c/

https://patriots.win/p/15JAXl30IU/breaking-fbi-found-ark-of-the-co/c/


And one for the IRS for good measure: https://patriots.win/p/15JAXm8v73/an-irs-audit-in-2023/c/; Fuck the Fedophiles!

1
Sidneyswarmsnatch76 1 point ago +1 / -0

With regularity.

1
Angryhotdog 1 point ago +1 / -0

Damn it how many times do I have to tell you msnbc will take the picture off and frame you mad lads.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
4
akira2501 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don't give Ayers credit. This is just pure Marx bullshit. Destabilize society to open the door for "permanent revolution." That's how you keep people under control. Bill wasn't clever enough to really understand it, or thankfully actually implement it. Real "tell me you're a detached rich kid without telling me you're a detached rich kid" bullshit.

If he was effective, you wouldn't have to remind people that he even existed.

5
PatrickHangry 5 points ago +5 / -0

You may be right about Ayers, but I don't think your last sentence is really true:

If he was effective, you wouldn't have to remind people that he even existed.

Ask yourself, "Who are the most powerful globalists, and how do we know?" We know Klaus Schwab, George Soros, Larry Fink, and Bill Gates, because they're effectively among the enemy's Generals, but none of them are -- for instance -- from generational central banking families themselves. The real powers behind the throne keep their names out of the media as much as they can.

1
HoganP 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. We do know he exists. Lol

1
HoganP 1 point ago +1 / -0

He was in a domestic terror organization that actually committed multiple acts of domestic terror. Survived prosecution and managed to stay out of jail.

Then spent the rest of his life in academia polluting the minds of generations of students and spreading it God knows how far to other professors at other institutions, etc.

Launched the political career of the man who, in all reality, might one day be credited with the greatest singular contribution to the destruction of the United States as a constitutional republic...On a literal straight line from Ayers living room into the White House within about a decade with the effects immediately felt unlike the early progressives who were content planting seeds and letting the rot grow over decades after they were gone.

This was not "effective" to you? I'd hate to think there are many around you think were.

Marx, himself, was a disaffected trust fund baby, also, and led the life of one. That does not mean he was not effective, considering his writings led to an ethos that has infected the planet and is still being contended with today.

1
akira2501 1 point ago +1 / -0

This was not "effective" to you?

The terror campaign, specifically, was not effective. Which, is probably why he switched to politics.

1
blitzkrieg1 1 point ago +1 / -0

mENTOR IS A NICE WORD FOR.........

9
d003 9 points ago +9 / -0

did you see the youtube video where the hawaii state official who signed off on obama's forged US birth certificate was drowned after the airplane she was traveling in had to do a water landing? scuba divers who were somehow in the area pulled her under water and drowned her. another passenger was recording the crash landing on their gopro, and a lucky few frames show a diver pull her under.

3
NvJohansson 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, l need to see that. I'm going to go look, you have a link or something specific that could be in the title like the name of the gal who would help thanks

3
Block_Helen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Loretta Fuddy

2
NvJohansson 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thx fren

4
Block_Helen 4 points ago +4 / -0

Welcome. That whole thing was hinky af. I've watched the video several times and I can't say for sure what happened but it is really weird. The water was warm and everyone else was either fine or had minor injuries, but she had cardiac arrest and died. Also, water landings of passenger craft are extremely rare.

2
simpleman1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good thing that plane crashed right by the divers.

What absolute bullshit dude.,

2
eupraxia128 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wonder how my least favorite sock monkey is doing these days.

2
I_Love_45-70_Gov 2 points ago +2 / -0

Obama was and still is a low-IQ Kenyan faggot.

His masters started this....

Stay focused, Pede.

1
belil569 1 point ago +2 / -1

Must be pretty young if you think it started there

1
NvJohansson 1 point ago +1 / -0

That physical assault thing? I didn't hear it in high level politics before him.

-1
belil569 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Calls to action for dems have been a thing for decades. Even local mayor's and others back in the 60s were calling for violence and shit. Nothing has changed except most people aren't willing to stand on their porch with a gun anymore.

It stopped those fuckers walking into your property then and it stops them the same way now.

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
27
deleted 27 points ago +32 / -5
19
ItsTooMuchWinning 19 points ago +19 / -0

And most of them would be happy to let their husbands vote on behalf of their families.

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
11
ultra-tera-maga 11 points ago +11 / -0

1 vote per tax positive household. Democracy for the taxed.

1
HoganP 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've never liked that because it ensconces taxes as the measure. The income tax must go and everyone will be paying consumption tax then which isn't really tracked on the consumer side.

8
45FortheWin 8 points ago +8 / -0

I would gladly give up my right to vote if it meant getting our country back. I'd also like to see the US go back to restricitng voting rights to property owners.

2
Wearyman 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have been thinking on this one a long time, and for me it would boil down to voting rights for:

  1. Home Owners, including those paying for a mortgage on a home. Must be primary residence.

  2. Sole proprietor or Partner Business owners.

  3. Active Second Tour and veteran military. (Get the vote after completing one tour of duty.)

  4. Active Duty Fire and Police. (local only)

Nobody else gets a vote. You either have skin in the game or are working/have worked for defense of the country or in service to your local community.

It isn't perfect, but it is better than giving the vote to people who will vote themselves largesse from the national coffers.

1
HoganP 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are plenty of people with skin in the game that fall in none of those categories. We have the voting eligibility that we do for good reasons that the founders already deliberated.

Given the maturity level of young people in the past decade, I don't think it would be inappropriate to raise the age a few years outside of those groups, though. If federal law says people must be allowed to stay on parents insurance until 26 it's not unreasonable to raise the voting age to that.

1
Wearyman 1 point ago +1 / -0

But the voting rules HAVE been changed. Multiple times.

One of the reasons that the "landowner" clause was in there was because the Founders understood that renters and employees have less incentive to vote for an open and low regulation government and more incentive to vote for largesse. Which is EXACTLY what happened when we opened up voting to anyone and everyone.

My idea is to go back to the more original way of doing it, but still maintaining some of the openness. Women can still vote, anyone of any race, creed or color can vote, and adults as young as 18 can vote. PROVIDED that they can meet one of the other criterion. So we aren't restricting on immutable characteristics like sex, race or age. THAT would be discriminatory. We are restricting on behavior and demonstrated responsibility.

I would also be open to adding other qualifiers as well, but not too many more.

1
HoganP 1 point ago +1 / -0

Constitutionally, no, they haven't. Amendments have extended voting to women and freed slaves, abolished poll taxes, and set the age at 18. That's it.

Besides that, voting eligibility has not changed in any other way since founding. There was never a "landowners clause" nor did we ever "open up voting to anyone and everyone" because all adult male citizens were always eligible to vote with the additional groups added later. States, individually, had varying requirements over the years that eventually were abandoned as the constitution was amended to be more specific about this.

I have a degree in US History with an emphasis on the founding and 19th century. You are simply mistaken if you think any of what you describe was the "original way of doing it."

Again, since you seem to have missed it the first time, tying voting to land ownership was seriously considered during the constitutional deliberations and it had a plurality of support amongst delegates, but it was abandoned along with lots of other things in the final document because the founders ultimately decided that there were enough other checks and that it invested average people in the system. If memory serves, there are Federalist Papers that discuss this.

1
Wearyman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting. I was under the impression that it had been in the original draft, but was removed before the final due to internal controversy. (If I remember correctly, Ben Franklin wasn't a fan)

That said, I still think my idea is a good one.

Clearly, extending voting rights to everyone was a mistake.

However, I don't think going back to the days of restricting rights based on immutable characteristics is good either. A person shouldn't lose a right because of who or what they were born as.

But the right to vote should be seen as a right to EARN. Just as we don't earn most rights until we reach adulthood, the vote should be viewed as an earned right.

You earn it by contributing in a manner that includes personal risk and/or effort.

Home ownership generally denotes responsibility. You have worked hard and earned enough to have credit good enough to be able to begin the purchase process on a home or even bought one outright. It's not a guarantee, but it is a big enough financial risk that owning one should earn you a vote. It shows stability and responsibility.

Business ownership also denotes responsibility and financial risk. Most sole proprietors have most of their worth tied up in their business. They lose the business, they can lose everything. Additionally, by running a business they are contributing to the local and the national economy and aiding the country as a whole. So they should earn the right to vote on those things that affect them most.

Service to country in the form of Military Service should also be rewarded with a permanent right to vote. You are risking your life to serve, you should earn rewards commensurate with that risk.

Service to Community via the Fire or Police services ALSO entails risk to life and limb, and should also be rewarded in the same manner.

But WHY would I restrict the vote to these groups of people? Because they are the ones MOST at risk from terrible leftist legislation, and the ones most likely to vote in a more Conservative and Constitutional manner. generally. (There are always outliers)

Why would I prevent he vote for say, young city living apartment dwellers? Because these are the people that vote for horrible "feel good" leftist policies that are destroying our country. They have PROVEN they cannot be trusted with the vote, so we should take it away from them.

The vote should only be granted to those who earn it. Don't want to earn it? Want to be a lazy, party going city dwelling apartment liver? Fine. You can do that. But no vote. You get ALL your other rights. You just don't get a say in how things are run in America.

1
AcidOverlord 1 point ago +1 / -0

How about "continuously employed for the previous 365 days and did not accept any government loans, grants or welfare during that period"?

1
Wearyman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Perhaps. But given that this would require the interference of the IRS and be more easily prone to fraud, simply having a job I don't think should be enough. Having a job should be the default for any able bodied adult. it shouldn't be a sign of extra responsibility or investment in the country.

2
Block_Helen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Same and same.

1
HoganP 1 point ago +1 / -0

It never happened. That was considered during the deliberations of the constitution and had a base of support amongst many delegates for a time, but it was never a thing in actual practice. Voting eligibility has been the same as it is now since the ratification of the constitution aside from women being included.

8
RATMW 8 points ago +8 / -0

Nah, they’re more likely to be left wing but it isn’t massive. It’s like 60/40

6
Verrerogo 6 points ago +6 / -0

I wish you were right.

Even deep in the countryside you will see a couple where an exasperated, patient, man has a wife who is to the left of him. Sometimes way to the left of him. He loves her so he lives with it. He has tried to talk her out of it, but hasn't succeeded.

2
independentbystander 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is my situation. My wife will lick the Red Pill, but will not ingest it. She is still too MSM/Hollywood obsessed to see the Leftist Agenda for what it is, although she has made minor progress since the Great Accelerationism of 2015.

5
rcstl 5 points ago +5 / -0

They would be covered as property owners, the way it was originally set up. Just having a 'gina is not reason to be able to vote.l

4
Pearls_Swine 4 points ago +4 / -0

Majority of them aren't white lol

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Pearls_Swine 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd limit voting rights to people who pay a certain amount of taxes. Those who don't contribute should not have a say in how the stolen money is spent.

But I was referring to the fact that 75% of those fugly women shouldn't even be in this country, and yet they want to destroy it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
18
utfanx2 18 points ago +18 / -0

BLM murdered police officers.

11
Pissed_American 11 points ago +11 / -0

Don't care. BLM was protected by police.

4
ryry117 4 points ago +4 / -0

The police are compliant bitches, but you can still use this point against leftists, so you should care in that regard.

3
Pissed_American 3 points ago +3 / -0

How does that hurt them? They clearly don't care. All that matters to them is the ends justify the means. The truth means nothing to them all they understand is force.

1
ryry117 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're not trying to convince the leftists who want to overthrow America, you're convincing the like 10% of voters who are dumb and swing every election.

18
Kenrailae 18 points ago +18 / -0

Done with Mitch the Bitch's 'Oh we have to be civil' bullshit. Time to go full McCarthy.

15
yurimodin 15 points ago +15 / -0

Joseph not Kevin

12
Gunmolester 12 points ago +12 / -0

you forgot Lori Lightfoot

9
Whoopies_tds 9 points ago +9 / -0

And blood in the streets cankles

3
yurimodin 3 points ago +3 / -0

we would have to censor the picture.

12
Snoman 12 points ago +13 / -1

Nah, how about we turn it up a couple notches ?

3
Oldpederaulfuerte 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep, let's turn this thing up to 11.

8
try4gain 8 points ago +8 / -0
  • Eric Holder (2018) :

Atty General Eric Holder : Michelle always says, When they (republicans) go low we go high"

Crowd joining in : we go high

Atty General Eric Holder : No no, when they go low, we kick them

Crowd : laughter and applause

Atty General Eric Holder : (serious face, not smiling) :

2
Pissed_American 2 points ago +2 / -0

Eric holder is a faggot. I bet he butt fucked obama everyday

8
Midgeba 8 points ago +8 / -0

That's (D)ifferent.

6
eupraxia128 6 points ago +6 / -0

People DIED because of these statements.

We need to be able to sue democrat party animals for their actions. They don't deserve to be exempt just because they are politicians.

6
Redditcensorsyouandi 6 points ago +6 / -0

Gasoline stations are getting too expensive to frequent anyway

4
ThomasJackson 4 points ago +7 / -3

You guys are going to learn or you will all die and your bloodline will be wiped off the earth forever. Then all of european society. Over 15K years of human development will all be for nothing.

You need to learn right here and right now. Your enemy does not believe in rules or morality. They believe they arbitrate both of those things by existing. They believe they are HELPING the PLANET. They will not stop, they will not slow down, they will not yield. They think they are doing GOOD. It feels them with a sense of purpose because they have absolutely ZERO meaning in life.

Everybody has already lost to these people. The retarded horde. The do-nothings who feel they also deserve a piece of the good life. The accomplish nothings who add nothing to humanity and even refuse to breed. They fill their time and useless lives by ordering you around. And now they want you all dead.

Go to reddit and see for yourself. They want you dead.

Rome lost to those people, the holy roman empire fell to those people, the nazis were crushed by those people, the confederates were genocided by those people.

You are next.

2
The_Sentinel 2 points ago +3 / -1

Nope, don't think so, and fully disagree. But I respect your very own beliefs.

Europe is a whole different animal. This is America. Over 15K years of development will NOT be wasted, and more importantly, that which was launched by the founders will forge ahead. In the next 10 to 15 years Europe, as led by NATO will go to war. The question is, will it war with the US, Russia, and or one of its own?

I do agree that the enemy has zero morality but that is not to say than once the evil and the cretins are identified that they will be treated with any mercy. No mercy, no second chances for those that have committed crimes against humanity, against this nation, against other human beings, against a long list of nations, and against the entire planet.

Yes, given that they have zero care for life, their very own lives will be extinguised. Easy peasy. ;-) Hammurabi was so spot on.

No, the planet has not already lost to these fuckers. Macron will be kicked out, you will see. BiXin will be removed and replaced. The criminals in DC are out of time, they are desperate. A dark day is coming for these bastards. Hello Barack, et al. :-) Yes, they do want us all dead, which only means, time to execute plans, look at lists, and get going, move forward with all manner of plans. The Neo-Bolshevik effort otherwise known as Ukraine and led by Globohomo Zelenskyy is dead on arrival. No matter how much funny money is sent by the US Congress.

Reddit is just another tool of the Globohomo. There are more bots, and paid nuts on that site, never mind AI, and all of it for naught. It is a megaphone that is NOT real.

Per your examples, while I do not agree fully, we do need to learn from history. So who is the enemy? Simple, all too many warmongers. One of them, just one, is the illustrious Henry Kissinger. Who is the enemy? All too many foreign leaders that have raped America and the world entire for too long. Did anyone say Queen Elizabeth, and the fraudulent throne of inbred family members? Yes, it is the Anglo/American/Zionist infiltration that is a well defined cancer. Yes, the enemy is also the: CDC, WHO, CFR, the WEF, the UN, the IBS, and the IMF, and NATO, and the European Union, with major exceptions. Again, the enemy is clearly identified. The only left to do is to push forward or should I say demolish.

There are ways, so very many ways. LMAO.

If next, I confidently say, Americans will surely be ready. :-)

1
Meddlesom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can you repeat that in Spanish please? Ya know, for the people replacing us.

1
EinhornisFinkle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well at least they can claim the moral High Ground as they set by passively and watch everything around them go to hell

4
OldZilla 4 points ago +4 / -0

Clearly Obama led political moves backed by the great reset villans. A lot of no show Republicans and that will come back to haunt them when we take back everything and hang these treasonous bastards for what they tried to do to our country. Starting with Main Steam Media first.

4
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 4 points ago +4 / -0

If it weren't for double-standards they would have no standards at all.

4
hillaryforprison 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sounds insurrectionny to me. Official term.

3
DJT_JR6544 3 points ago +3 / -0

Uh oh, spaghettios! We said there is a cold civil war. How super duper meanses and racistses! Guess we should be more like these mostly peaceful democrats, huh Ben Collins?

3
dparks2010 3 points ago +3 / -0

While these jackasses ARE full of shit, this is not a Shitpost.

3
US3RNAM3 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tired of their bullshit too, Alice.

2
Alice_is_Tired [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

Much appreciated

1
SeawolfEmeralds 1 point ago +1 / -0

You two metoo!

3
Smurfection 3 points ago +3 / -0

also, Loretta Lynch called for blood in the streets.

Anyway, notice that it's all Democrat women call for the violence. Seems to me that when women get political power they are more vicious and brutal than men.

3
EinhornisFinkle 3 points ago +3 / -0

Imagine if the right had a lawyer's Guild ready to bail out protesters and a crowd sourced bail fund set up by Republican politicians... actually, why don't that have that?

3
MajorClark 3 points ago +3 / -0

The General Mills plant is burning. Where were these skanks at?

2
t_l_winks 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not a shitpost when the quotes are real.

2
Crappydatum 2 points ago +2 / -0

Easy for THEM to say, they've got every branch of the Deep State in their hip pocket

Given what they did to UNARMED Jan 6 protesters, what do you think they'll order their Gestapo to do to armed resistance?

1
ModernDayMao 1 point ago +1 / -0

How many men do they have willing to die to protect them? We know they have plenty of men that will step on your neck while you sit on your hands. How many of those paychecks collectors are ready to die to protect their masters?

2
I_Love_45-70_Gov 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cause

Unrest

Not

Tolerable

Some would say

2
Mr_Rightside 2 points ago +3 / -1

"I just want to stop the world from killing itself."

Donald Trump

2
TAIWANNUMBERONE 2 points ago +2 / -0

They aren't baiting you into acting. They're baiting you into obvious action. There's tons of ways to take them on that keep your tracks covered, but it requires coordination and initiative. A big crowd of people with guns won't work.

2
TexasBrowncoat 2 points ago +2 / -0

and don't forget Madonna saying that she wants to blow up the White House.

1
COLDWARPATRIOT55 1 point ago +1 / -0

We need to do all these things, then when the cops show up, we say, “Ayanna Presley set this up”or We were told to do this by Kamal Harris Maxine waters called us to do this Best of all, we are here because Nancy Pelosi wanted us to carry out uprisings.

1
Meddlesom 1 point ago +1 / -0

...and here we are, cowing each other into submission.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
FireTheCannons1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe PW should crack down on the glowies in the chat? The chat has been front and center in several news articles today because of some of the comments.

1
Jan6Insurrectionist 1 point ago +2 / -1

Remember not to do anything untoward to the people who burned down your cities, caused billions in damages, stole an election, are running this country into the ground, and would without a flicker of remorse or hesitation slaughter you and your entire family.

1
blueballs43 1 point ago +1 / -0

THEY MAY YET GET WHAT THEY SAY THEY WANT!

1
Keepidahofree 1 point ago +1 / -0

You should hear what I'm saying in my head these days...

1
rossiFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

In 2024, if I see antifa or blm, I will remember that we are only commanded to turn the cheek once.

1
REDPILLEDBYALEXJONES 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is why we won't stop with the rhetoric you dirty commies!

1
patrioticwinning3 1 point ago +1 / -0

How is "the FBI, DOJ, are run by the globalists, the scum of the UNIVERSE, and their agents are panty-sniffing-pervert-pedo-faggots, who beat the crap out of their wives for not wanting to get gangbanged, and should burn in Hell along side their gloalists puppetiers" in any way "rhetoric" :p

1
Lower 1 point ago +1 / -0

Should have one last picture of Biden saying "Where am I? I wiped my butt!"

1
GuerillaYourDreams 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ben Collins, where do you stand on THIS? The utter faggotry of the Left.

1
YouTubeSucksDicks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Should not have the shitpost flair.

1
citydwellertrumpfan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately, following their advice for those who aren't Dems is legally unadvisable.

0
Brooklyn_Patriot_76 0 points ago +3 / -3

HANDSHAKE!

Proceed with caution - GLOWING

3
Alice_is_Tired [S] 3 points ago +4 / -1

Ok

0
SelfReliancePepe 0 points ago +1 / -1

Don't forget Loretta Lynch calling for violence in the streets and blood and murder.

-1
ProtestantPatriot -1 points ago +2 / -3

This is why stupid dumb whores are never granted any sort of authority

3
rcstl 3 points ago +3 / -0

Repeal the 19th.

-5
Jibideen -5 points ago +2 / -7

Can we please organize Trump trains around all the FBI field offices?