1939
Comments (177)
sorted by:
166
Dee1952 166 points ago +166 / -0

They want in on the investment action.

110
Pissonit 110 points ago +110 / -0

Didn’t they do the same thing in Ukraine….

107
ExecutiveWoodchipper 107 points ago +107 / -0

They sure did

100% money laundering/insider trading/setting up off shore bribery accounts

54
45FortheWin 54 points ago +55 / -1

Maybe those 87000 armed IRS auditors should be sent to Ukraine.

9
LetFreedomReign 9 points ago +9 / -0

That's actually not a bad idea. When Trump returns, send them all to hotbed locations that got a shit ton of taxpayer money sent and account for every dollar spent. Either we'll actually get an accounting of what happened to it all or all 87k will quit. Either way.....

1
MemeForTheWin 1 point ago +1 / -0

The IRS agents are armed

29
DrBJTester 29 points ago +29 / -0

They sure did

100% money laundering/insider trading/setting up off shore bribery accounts

Maybe those 87000 armed IRS auditors should be sent to Ukraine

More wisdom in these two posts than the Biden Administration and the hopelessly corrupt ruling class combined!

Lock them all up!

19
Pukeahontas 19 points ago +19 / -0

Remember when these piece of shit faggots wanted to tour the world on US tax payers cost, while their own cities and states were burning.. and Trump literally shut their flights down?

Thats the way to deal with these traitorous sons of bitches

6
War_Hamster 6 points ago +9 / -3

Except Taiwan has a much more transparent and reputable banking system with a government making excellent steps towards reform.

I think we're missing something here.

2
pacalis128 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, they're all taking stakes in Taiwanese and Singapore semi-conductor and green energy companies, which will launder money through the "Inflation Reduction" bill.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

If it's that simple, I'll be disappointed in their degeneracy. Simple solutions are sometimes correct, though.

1
1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

I did see that earlier.

I also recently saw a Xi speech where he said the proper timing for reunification with Taiwan was 2049. Not sure what the rationale was, but it was a public speech.

2
Totally_Not_FBI 2 points ago +2 / -0

Perhaps the dems have a vested interest in China finally taking Taiwan.

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

When I think Dems, I think WEF Great Reset. They seem to be all in on that.

What I can't figure out is if China is in on that, just playing along, keeping their options open and straddling the fence, or some other game.

I do know that China has control of a lot of out politicians and I also know they have severe economic and demographic challenges that are imminent.

I'm still trying to put this puzzle together, and it's an important question.

2
Totally_Not_FBI 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am sure they view us the same way the Japanese did back when they were the big economic powerhouse. The Chinese big shots understand they have influence over our politics, but see us as inferior, inept and terribly unstable and are basically here to be "managed" as best as possible while they do their own thing. I seriously doubt they see the Great Reset as anything other than complete self destructive fantasy by a bunch of western lunatics.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the ChiComms are overconfident like that right now, they don't understand demographics.

They have some real issues.

2
pacalis128 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pelosi is happy because she set up Jr on the first trip.

China is happy because the American's help them play the war drums back home while they try to deal with a domestic economic collapse.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
ExecutiveWoodchipper 2 points ago +2 / -0

So what you're saying is no small hats?

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Every nation in the world has Deep State 5th Column actors, with all sizes of hats.

They're just currently doing a good job of fighting back against the corruption of those who don't play by the rules.

1
2016TrumpMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I'm not sure what's up. The delegation is all shit tier back bench congressmen. These are not people worth bribing.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +2 / -5
3
day221 3 points ago +5 / -2

War Hamster has some good contributions here but on a lot of issues he's clearly naive af.

1
Standingoak 1 point ago +1 / -0

Opinions are like ass holes everyone has one , most don't want to hear from them. But those that do can feel free to listen.

Everyone is naive , until they are not. And SUPREMACISTs think only their shit don't stink.

1
Totally_Not_FBI 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Pelosi's and their cronies want to get in early on any opportunities from the Chinese takeover of major Taiwanese industries. I doubt it goes much deeper than that.

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-3
TableMaker -3 points ago +1 / -4

You mean China. Biden family and Pelosi's son and husband do money laundering and business deals with CHINA/PRC/CCP.

12
AnacronicA 12 points ago +12 / -0

I wonder what China will say this time. They just did training exercises after threatening doom and destruction when Pelosi went for her investment scheming last time.

14
mugatucrazypills 14 points ago +14 / -0

They will work out a deal where the dems get a huge cut on billions to 'protect Taiwan"

Then it will fall anyways and the Chinese invasion control will cover up all their laundering.

Thie is Afghanistan with Chinese people.

6
Handshake2 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is spot on. Hope people are starting to catch on, and guess who's in bed with the chinx...

Cough....vlad...cough...

Everyone is in on it except the "commoners" who virtue signal about what side they're on.

4
AnacronicA 4 points ago +5 / -1

But all U.S. lawmakers arriving in Taiwan today are all semiconductor industry investors. They'll be taking an additional serious loss if Taiwanese industry is disrupted by invasion as will many others. Is it worth it?

3
splink 3 points ago +3 / -0

If it gets rid of those "lawmakers" I would say it is worth it at this point.

2
mugatucrazypills 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's will be another 200Bbbill us tacoayers to pay Taiwan's one percent new factories one country over. They will get on last plane out.also 200B in arms with dems taking 2/3 Regular tawanese will be taxed for that debt for weapons that will break.

Probably worry it for them

1
pacalis128 1 point ago +1 / -0

Taiwan, and all the Dem "investors" are a receptor for all the bullshit "Inflation Reduction Act"

This is just like Ukraine. They set up a money laundering scheme in a hot zone and then funnel US money. If there's an invasion they can move even more US money.

-3
TableMaker -3 points ago +1 / -4

And Hunter/Joe Biden and Pelosi's son and husband are investors/money launderers in China. What's your point? We should start simping for the Chicoms even though Hunter/Joe were doing money laundering via only two countries, Ukraine and China?

2
Brobold 2 points ago +2 / -0

China is in on it. If they weren't, we'd be seeing mass propaganda from them calling her out on the insider trading and corruption.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
pacalis128 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. They win because they get to play the Pelosi visit in China as proof that the US is an aggressor state.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Pukeahontas 1 point ago +2 / -1

China is a spineless bitch.

They wont do shit

If they arent able to pull the trigger then all their media flapping their wings aint worth shit

2
rebuildingMyself 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also to score political points and distract from their horrible job performance.

1
RecreationalNyquil 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wonder how many semiconductor CEO's they met with on their visit

55
WinterSoldier82 55 points ago +55 / -0

GRIFT for Demoncracy

18
BidensPrisonWallet 18 points ago +18 / -0

The RINOs will be along shortly. Mitch can't miss his spot at the trough.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
50
tellittothedead1 50 points ago +53 / -3

Trying to start a war

20
TexasJack 20 points ago +20 / -0

At home and abroad.

6
Dangerous_donald1 6 points ago +6 / -0

If we are under declaration of war, they will suspend elections. Coming soon to a banana republic near you!

3
faucipolice 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think that would be a breaking point for a lot of people.

1
Demig80 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't worry, they already are planning to tax or shoot "those people".

3
havemydata 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yeah, it'd be way better if they cucked to China and stayed home. That would show them right?

2
45ForEver2024 2 points ago +3 / -1

Lawl. Why because China gets to dictate where Americans should travel? FUCK CHYNA!

-11
AJoeDD -11 points ago +5 / -16

China will be too scared to fight. They're weak and vulnerable.

11
tellittothedead1 11 points ago +13 / -2

Lol, are you high?

10
AJoeDD 10 points ago +11 / -1

Persuasive argument.

It's because,

  1. Due to the defensible position of the island, China would need to expend a huge % of their forces to forcibly occupy TW, assuming they get no help.
  2. If they attack, they will be promptly energy and food resource starved. These rely on imports that China cannot protect. E.g., their oil shipments are something their navy doesn't have the range to protect and would be easily disrupted, if not cut off. They would also be cut off from US food and other resources and in a few months have starvation unprecedented since the Cultural Revolution.
  3. In reality, they would not face TW alone, but the US, Japan, Korea, possibly Australia too. Not a promising situation when their army, air force, and navy tech is made of hand-me-downs and out of date thefts from, mostly, the US.
  4. There is no evidence they have any strength at all. They make a show of trying to parade or show off capabilities to give exaggerated impressions. A classic case of "appear strong when you are weak".

They're very weak and that's reflected by them saying they'll shot Pelosi down if she comes in a fighter jet and then doing nothing. They know they'd get ruined. Their only card is pretending to be strong and making cocky threats.

edit: I forgot one other CCP strength: Biden.

9
tellittothedead1 9 points ago +9 / -0

Correct on Biden. Incorrect on about everything else. Number 1, they have at least a million man standing army, they have a bigger navy than we do, and a modern Air Force. When North Korea gets involved, that’s another million men. Russia gets involved, that’s another tens of thousands. We don’t have the man power to fight them.

China doesn’t need to expend as much as their forces as you think; they’d just surround the island and block it. I don’t think you fully understand how massive they have built up their army in the last 30 years. Ditto to their navy.

They have an updated, modern navy, army, Air Force. Yes, they’ve copied our shit, but I guarantee you that they reserve the good shit for themselves.

Considering they’ve literally built islands in the South Pacific, your statement that there’s no evidence of the Chinese having any strength, is completely ridiculous, absurd, and foolish. You sound like a neocon shill to be honest.

Never underestimate your enemy.

PS: how did the taliban do against us?

3
AJoeDD 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes they have a bigger army and bigger population. That's essentially their only military advantage.

  • N. Korea helping them with Taiwan is unlikely, unsure why you'd mention it just because they're allies. They firstly can't easily move their army to be involved with Taiwan directly, they can mostly threaten S. Korea. That part was true regardless of a Taiwan situation, but it's essentially a suicide option for NK. Are they going to opt for mutual destruction for the sake of Taiwan reunification? Sounds absurd. It's unlikely RU would involve themselves directly with troops either.

  • You should ask yourself: if they can take TW so easily by blockade, why did they not do it? They promised they would if something like a military jet came into TW, and if it would be a low cost militarily for them, they would do it in a heartbeat if they could. Oddly, they didn't. Secondly, as I mentioned, China would be resource starved in a war. I forgot to mention last post how they are nearly on the verge of a massive collapse without a war being considered, anyway. Consequences of war for them now would be starving and lacking energy to power their country and war in months. I said that last time, and can provide references if needed, but you just sidestep this point and assert China would be more successful with a blockade. Poor discussion, poor argumentation.

  • "They have an updated, modern navy, army, Air Force" - like what, dude? You say that but provide no reason as to why. And it is a vague statement, how is it supposed to refute my point that they have inferior tech? This sounds like Wumao propaganda. We do not have access to the entire scope of their military, particularly as they haven't used it in conflicts (mostly using it in parades, flyovers, and squashing protests in Hong Kong). We know that they say their military is freaking awesome. But if you follow China, you find most of their tech in leading industries is inferior and is dependent on other countries. They boast about their high tech in those areas too. They love to make hilarious boasts on the regular, even as they fail in attempts to make chips, and even farm equipment that they hype up. Since we have no real documented evidence, we know that 1) you don't know how strong they are, so you're apparently high on the abilities of the CCP, which is in conflict with 2) we know the always boast but usually fail in a pathetic manner with tech in other industries.

  • Saying they built islands is your example of strength? Why don't you develop that thought. You just say they built islands, therefore strong, then ad hominem at me. Poor discussion and poor argumentation again. I was referring to a lack of involvement in any modern military engagement as the lack of evidence. They have no example of military performance, or experience. Their experience is essentially only fighting unarmed civilians and protesters. An island has strategic importance, but that does not alone lead to conclusions about their holistic military strength. Your statements are hollow and vague. Why don't you elaborate how these are supposed to be enough of an example of strength before you act like you proved a point and go to your ad homs?

  • Saying not to underestimate the enemy is all well and good, but overestimating them and giving them concessions isn't smart either. China has long operated on tough talk and fronting strength that they don't actually demonstrate since Xi Jinping came in. They take advantage of people dumb enough to be afraid of them. They may actually reach a position of strength that approaches the level they boast of if people keep giving them whatever they want. Particularly true of Taiwan, that would change them from being in a weak position to a very strong one.

The Taliban is a real bad analogy to make. That references an occupation and guerrilla warfare, whereas this involves direct conflict of the forces involved...... And FYI I never believed that we would easily succeed in guerrilla warfare and didn't support the Middle-Eastern occupations from the start. Weird you call me a Neocon shill as you appear to shill Wumao propaganda.

1
tellittothedead1 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ll respond later thought

1
pacalis128 1 point ago +1 / -0

Palmer Lucky, the young billionaire that founded Oculus, got fired for supporting trump memes, and then founded Anduril, which secured a $1B SOCOM drone contract, says the Chinese drone program is 10 years ahead of the US.

The invasion of Taiwan would be an unpredictable mess with at least a million casualties - that's why China is holding off.

1
AJoeDD 1 point ago +1 / -0

I assume you're talking about military drones not the toy drones that China is most known for. What's this based on? Drones started use 20 years ago, and started being used for strikes about 10 years ago. Yet they are 10 years ahead of us, somehow? Odd. His statement must have a public source that we can verify, like a Chinese drone test, since if he learned this from his contracts with various governments he would't be allowed to reveal it. I'm skeptical until seeing a source. Though if true they have an edge in drones, it doesn't erase their pattern of embarrassing tech development in other fields and indicate that all of their military tech is on the same footing.

What I can find by searching is not positive for the CCP. https://eurasiantimes.com/chinas-very-own-version-of-us-predator-drones-falling-apart-in-global-market-sales-reputation/

I have been hearing things like this for years in my field of molecular biology. The most prestigious journal Nature gets paid big bucks by China and they always hype them up. Sometimes they count the amount of good publications and compare a Chinese one (the Chinese Academy of Sciences) to other countries and show how good it's done, without mentioning the CAS has a few hundred institutions across the country that are counted as a single university. Sometimes they had outrageous stories which read like fiction that are very similar to the drone claim. I can still remember one in which they describe a British scientist visiting a seminar in a local Chinese institution and he was so shocked and amazed by what he saw, he stood up and with shaking hands pointing at the student presenting said "we have been surpassed!". In that work of fiction written for 12 year olds, they of course did not specify what this mysterious great tech was. It was over 10 years ago now, and no such magnificent biotech has ever come out of China that would remotely warrant such a crazed reaction. In reality, Chinese biological research remains far behind. There are a few excellent researchers, about on par for a developed nation, but the average research is very poor. In fact they even suffer from knockoff reagents that will systemically damage the chance of research success.

1
tellittothedead1 1 point ago +1 / -0

TODR, but wrong

1
AJoeDD 1 point ago +1 / -0

Number of defended/substantiated facts by you used throughout this: 0.

2
ProphetOfKek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Considering that China wants to keep their infrastructure intact, a blockade makes sense. I’d fully expect the US to sit idly by and watch, but who knows.

1
deleted 1 point ago +5 / -4
2
ProphetOfKek 2 points ago +2 / -0

While true, I wonder if their missile defense systems are good enough for protection. Also if any forces other than the Taiwanese would have the balls to do it.

1
tellittothedead1 1 point ago +2 / -1

Keep Larping kid

1
anotherthing 1 point ago +1 / -0

A war is a great way of getting rid of extra mouths to feed. I'm pretty sure China's COVID lockdowns have more to do with their food shortage than it does with COVID.

4
2ScoopsMAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's what I'm gathering. A friend recently pointed out the Russian proverb called "China's Final Warning." From wiki, "More than 900 Chinese "final warnings" had been issued by the end of 1964."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China%27s_final_warning

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'd have led with their economic vulnerability due to debt/real estate glaring issues.

But, occupying Taiwan, once concurred, wouldn't be that difficult. Taiwan is the least armed citizenry in the world.

2
AJoeDD 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep I forgot that. They're currently in a very fragile position and that makes the probable impact of lack of food and energy shortages they'd face in a war more dangerous. This is assuming they didn't buy off our politicians who refuse to fight or meaningfully sanction. (I know sanctions appear like a joke after what happened to RU, but unlike RU, China depends on others for food and energy)

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

The scenario/narrative you're describing is one of several plausible ones currently, and even yours is branching off depending on exactly what a US political response would be.

It's a really important topic; what exactly are China's real plans on the world stage.

I don't have an answer, just several conflicting possibilities.

I'm working on that, with some planned discussions this week with some subject experts who don't even agree with each other.

When it comes to China and the Great Reset, I can make a case both directions.

It's a bit frustrating, and I don't think we'll know until close to the end of this whole ordeal.

2
AJoeDD 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, my scenario is based on the assumption that the US actually takes a rationale approach and defends Taiwan, and tries to win in the most effective manner. The scary possibility is Biden just says "oh you can just have Taiwan I'm withdrawing everything" after a new payment is made to Hunter. CCP then gains semiconductor manufacturing, surpasses us and gains huge geopolitical influence over the many countries and businesses that need them.

I'm not sure if your question about China and the Great Reset is about what is planned by WEF-Great Reset people wrt China. I don't know the answer either, but my gut is that they'd like to see China collapse and be abandoned (and after, IDK). For the last year or more, China seems to have broken from the globalists and the amount of criticism and times Western countries started to "suddenly notice" the bad things they've been doing for a long time now. As it currently is, China is not controllable by globalists. Unless the government of China is radically changed I cannot see how China is good for globalists. Given China's fragile state and dependence on foreign imports, and the failings of their "belt and road" initiatives, it could be easy for globalists to choke them and hasten their collapse.

Here is a condensed short talk on China's collapse by Peter Zeihan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOMt6nqJLLI It's a bit dumbed down to fit into a short time frame so there is probably a lot of nuances ignored, but regardless, he made some worthwhile points. Such as China's resource issues, population crisis and how it fits into the real estate crisis, the issues of China's navy and how that affects oil shipments. It was interesting how he mentioned the population data was something China intentionally lied about because it was bad. That again exemplifies how China tries so hard to put on a strong front which isn't true.

BTW is the discussion you meant something you posting online or were you referring to some offline discussion?

1
SteveRogers42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Our submarines alone could prevent any amphibious invasion.

0
Melania2032 0 points ago +1 / -1

Got a hold of all that China fentanyl

1
jlynbk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Starving bucktoothed yellow atheists who hate their government. Not an ideal fighting force.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Alternative description; brainwashed zealots who were honed under stern authoritarian discipline and enhanced by testosterone.

Still, untested and incapable of free thought.

It would be interesting if it weren't for the human tragedy.

2
AJoeDD 2 points ago +2 / -0

I used to live in China and I'd be surprised if they use testosterone much, based on how they look. Often saw uniformed army people, particularly at train stations because they have a special line, and nothing in the appearance suggested testosterone.

Would it be easy to manage testosterone use for a large number of their forces? There might be downsides to a widespread program if not carefully managed, in the long term. I've heard rumors about it being available for soldiers who want it in our armed forces but IDK.

The idea of them hating the government might become factor if starvation does come. I'm not really sure what to expect as I don't know the dynamics or psychology of the majority of their force and different branches of leadership. Any pede with knowledge in this area - please drop some knowledge.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's a top down hierarchy. They are never going to have the independent thinking capability of the US NCO model.

Also, I just watched some more Zeihan. He lost some credibility with me because he was calling J6 an insurrection and his only problem with the Big Tech censorship was it was imposed by private companies instead of Congress.

There's a few more issues, but he's likely right about demographics.

2
AJoeDD 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for the info. I'm kind of not surprised Zeihan thought that way about J6. While he shows he studied up in detail in some things, he gives me the impression of someone who is immodest, not very careful, and altogether felt a little suspect. I have heard the points about the resource problems, the cult-of-personality problems, and military problems from other sources though so I feel these are legitimate problems for the CCP.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Zeihan is very likely right about his demographic theories, but he's off on several other topics.

You should hear him talking about Vaccines. Made me think he's getting paid by Pfizer.

It was about 20 minutes into this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yttug-a3sWI

1
TommyLasordasBallBag 1 point ago +1 / -0

You'll be surprised how obedient a hungry man can be to someone handing him enough rations to live.

1
HerbertBailBondsh 1 point ago +1 / -0

mostly poor farmers.

48
10gauge 48 points ago +50 / -2

Getting bribes from Taiwan to help stop China. They will stab Taiwan in the back.

13
SCP0073 13 points ago +13 / -0

There’s so many reasons :(

38
deleted 38 points ago +39 / -1
27
FightingTeuton 27 points ago +28 / -1

False flag incoming

12
PatriotSkorzeny 12 points ago +12 / -0

Because the Pit just revealed that it’s China.

Not one single fucking Constitutional person in the entire globFed.

Come what May. 😂😂😂🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️

11
Rebellion32 11 points ago +11 / -0

Don't link to FOX, they're part of the machine we're fighting

8
1777 8 points ago +8 / -0

Archive link needs to be the go to for all.

11
Redpill_Hippie 11 points ago +11 / -0

Looking for some crumbs Nancy left behind

1
AJoeDD 1 point ago +1 / -0

They may also be doing this for publicity. They've been tanking in the polls. Slapping the CCP is the only positive PR they've had in like 2 years. I'm sure there was dual purposes with Nancy's visit, with the main one being profit (keep an eye on Nancy's Portfolio Tracker on Gab), but wouldn't be surprised if these others have the PR as the primary motivation.

6
Krat 6 points ago +6 / -0

What corrupted shit is going on over there?

5
UNITED_WE_STAND1776 5 points ago +6 / -1

Waste our Money for a publicity stunt, but don't have the balls to go to the border? Fuck them.

4
farfiman 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's the new cash cow instead of Ukraine.

3
leanpocket 3 points ago +3 / -0

This reminds me of when John McCain went to visit ISIS to secure his own bag in the future conflicts.

2
DoomerBoyo 2 points ago +3 / -1

Gotta get in on those chip deals Nancy secured.

Get it while the grift is good.

2
TheJaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

New headline: Pelosi unable to spur war in Asia on her timeline, passes the torch to other congressmen to give it another go

2
AnecdotalEconomics 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're trying to give China the excuse and argument it needs to invade Taiwan. They think the American people will rally around the Dems if China invades

1
AllTheWayTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

sure why not. They’re not paying for anything. Fucking leeches.

1
GodIsPerfect 1 point ago +1 / -0

OBVIOUS EXTORTION!! “We’ll give you a few billion, park some aircraft carriers parked close by to protect you from China, but 50% to the Democrat Party or we’ll get a regime change and do it anyway. Our failures = your worst nightmares.”

1
gaijin_ronin 1 point ago +1 / -0

No this is on purpose to get china to waste all of it's ammo. Then the dems will claim they disarmed china.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
schism 1 point ago +1 / -0

They want to get us into a war with China, because the people in our Gov't actively destroying the U.S. are working for the Chinese and know will be richly rewarded. Change my mind.

1
AJoeDD 1 point ago +1 / -0

Despite many being bribed by the Chinese, I think globalists have more power over our politics than the CCP does. Currently it looks like globalists are at odds with China. They've been pissing each other off more openly in the last year.

While it's true we've been getting destroyed from the inside, it doesn't mean the CCP would win. They have too many vulnerabilities that would be exploited in war, and are quite weak. See above for posts and video links discussing why. They're on the verge of economic collapse and possible starvation in the near term before even considering war.

We already gave them enough of an excuse for war. They said there would be war if a military plane ever entered Taiwan, and that they'd immediately take Taiwan by force if it happened. But, they didn't do it. Despite the big loss of face it cause them with their people. That's because they're bluffing and know they would get wrecked in a war.

1
mass55th 1 point ago +1 / -0

They want to get their investment deals settled before they lose their Congressional majorities.

1
alxhsa 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess an in-person visit is required these days to get insider trading information.

1
BayTiger 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is a geopolitical disaster. They’re going to start a war with Chi-na.

1
BestLife55 1 point ago +1 / -0

why can't they just use zoom?

1
AJoeDD 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can't rub a zoom in someone's face quite as well.

Also in the case of Zoom...Zoom was made by a Chinese American (iirc, an immigrant, not one born here) and Elon said it's insecure and won't allow it to be used by Tesla.

1
madman242 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think they went over to pull their dirty money out. They have the inside scoop when the Chi Coms are going to invade.

1
MehNahMehNah 1 point ago +1 / -0

I donrecall who said but I believe China's practice is to punish the weakest in a multi-front conflict. It's a cheap and easy to intimidate everyone watching.

If you listen to Michael Savage he has postulated the CCP will annex some nearby island to advance their goals of controlling southeast Asia. In a way Taiwan has been part of 'China' for a very long time much like most of Ukraine is part of 'Russia.'

1
alien123 1 point ago +1 / -0

"I donrecall who said but I believe China's practice is to punish the weakest in a multi-front conflict. It's a cheap and easy to intimidate everyone watching."

sounds like what feminists do

1
MehNahMehNah 1 point ago +1 / -0

i.e. children?

1
KuzoKevin 1 point ago +2 / -1

Attention whores.

1
NvJohansson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Warmongers gonna monger

1
Nomad899 1 point ago +1 / -0

Getting ready to sell the place out.

1
dagoat4l 1 point ago +1 / -0

They want war. Begging for war. The elites want the working class dead and who loves enslaved.

1
Steve56775 1 point ago +1 / -0

They have to collect their checks for passing the chip bill.

1
Wupta 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anything to give themselves a war so that they can interfere with the midterm elections, in fact I’ll do further this is collusion with their overlords in China to create a protest for war. We aren’t going to war but we’ll see our midterm elections stolen.

1
MythArcana 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, more money laundering cash grabs then. Trump would never allow this bullshit, that's why they hate him so much.

1
pacalis128 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pelosi Jr had first dibs

1
madagea 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gotta get china angrier.Or it is just a larp to make people think they are getting tough with china,especially if it is provable that china sorted the election for them

1
TomCrush 1 point ago +1 / -0

Never trust a Democrat.

1
baseballs 1 point ago +1 / -0

California has no more problems, time to get hookers and coke in taiwan.

They are going to meet chinese diplomats to negotiate a quick takeover of taiwan.

1
OrenthalGMudbone 1 point ago +1 / -0

*We got to install kleptocrat puppets

Stolen riches, full thieveryyyyyy

We got to move these illegal raiders

We got to move this Ukraine laundryyyyyy

See the little faggot with the flag pin and the makeup

Yeah buddy, that's his own hair

That little faggot's been on Epstein's jet airplane

That little faggot's got establishment flair*

1
Ace-Hardgroin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m pro-Taiwan just because I tend to side with the underdog. Also, I believe mainland China is occupied by a hostile foreign power and the Taiwanese are the ones who fled the real Republic of China.

 

That said, fuck these military industrial complex stooges. Intentions matter. They don’t give a fuck about Taiwan’s sovereignty.

1
snoopy3210 1 point ago +1 / -0

They want China to takeover Taiwan. Damn these people are stupid. There’s no doubt this is an intentionally planned decline. The WEF clearly wants to shift the power center from America to Asia.

And our lawmakers are falling for it, either with this stupid move or by devaluating the US dollar by throwing trillions out of the window for “racist bridges”. There’s is also this intent to push Russia into China’s orbit by constantly trolling Russia to invade Ukraine and later sanction them, making China unite with Russia. Look at the many provocations for the entire 2021 year by Biden’s team and then he hoped that would be a minor incursion. It’s clear as day and night.

1
fjzappa 1 point ago +1 / -0

US Congress is not constitutionally chartered to play around in Foreign Policy. That said, who here thinks Biden or his puppeteers know the first thing about Foreign Policy?

1
Thathurtsmyfeelings1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Desperate pleas to the east for mid term help.

1
CMDRConanAAnderson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Threatening more prosecutors are we? Or is it politicians this time?

1
Emodius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Time to get the money!

That's cool plunge us into ww4 since 3 already started as long as they get their cash. Fucking scum

1
OrangeCatBad 1 point ago +1 / -0

That where they are picking up the money they funnel into Ukraine

1
splink 1 point ago +1 / -0

How can we make sure they can't ever come back?

1
downwithuppish 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who was it that put forward the theory the heads of the CCP actually live in Thailand? Because why would you surround yourself with the people you're screwing. I need to bookmark videos.

1
alien123 1 point ago +1 / -0

clearly they are picking up bribes

they just pass a bill to benefit taiwain. they need their kickacks

1
Shaffro 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did they take big empty suitcases to stuff with money?