2051
Comments (89)
sorted by:
138
TrueTemper2 138 points ago +138 / -0

There is no reason or justification to collaborate with Democrats on any legislation. Focus should be on impeachment and investigations that should be ready to launch in January of next year.

60
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 60 points ago +60 / -0

Arrests, tribunals and, if warranted, executions for treason against the People of the United States.

23
DefenderDad 23 points ago +23 / -0

Heh, “if”

4
MAGAHound2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

Based Patrick Henry

31
saltyviewer123 31 points ago +31 / -0

They were never going to give up the court packing idea. It's the last rung in the ladder before the US gov't is completely controlled by a political hat that controls all aspects of society and answers to no one much like the CCP.

5
HerbertBailBondsh 5 points ago +5 / -0

Would that "political hat" possibly be small?

2
saltyviewer123 2 points ago +2 / -0

My guess is about 2000 core people.

1
Dreeval 1 point ago +1 / -0

The UN just told us that's a conspiracy theory, they're really insistent about it to.

6
Filthy_MALE 6 points ago +8 / -2

You can walk and chew gum.

I never anticipated RvW being overturned, for example. The sky is the limit these days.

Maybe they can cut some other Democratic legislation?

I say this half-seriously, but if you throw enough legislation around, something is bound to get passed simply because most senators and congressman are old and can’t keep up with the workload lmao

14
Feral_Frog_Warrior 14 points ago +14 / -0

Congress doesn't read or write the legislation because it doesn't matter to them. They vote how their masters tell them.

-11
Womb___Raider -11 points ago +2 / -13

Roe was not overturned. It's up to the states to decide.

18
TruckFudeau 18 points ago +20 / -2

Roe WAS overturned.

12
STONKATRUCK 12 points ago +12 / -0

It was overturned that's why it's now up to the states.

2
Filthy_MALE 2 points ago +2 / -0

But that spells doom for PP because a majority of Americans have never been for abortion.

And that number is slowly rising; pro-choice people are nervous to share their views.

1
Basedsliceofwinning 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd certainly say the majority of Americans would definitely be against abortions all the way up to birth.

3
SaltyKrakenBalls 3 points ago +3 / -0

Any deviation from this plan is complying with communists. The Demoncrat Party needs to be charged with Sedition and Treason. Enforce The Communist Control Act of 1954. 68 Stat. 775, 50 U.S.C. 841-844, is an American law signed by President Dwight Eisenhower on 24 August 1954 that outlaws the Communist Party of the United States. ENFORCE THIS LAW ON ALL THOSE THAT ARE GUILTY. McCarthy wasn't wrong.

2
559throw 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah but how many retarded "Republicans" will still vote for it? The same ones who keep voting with the Dems on everything else they want?

75
Mother_of_gains 75 points ago +77 / -2

The aren't even pretending anymore. They just want power at all costs.

The Democrats are just as dangerous as they were in 1860.

16
LEGlON 16 points ago +20 / -4

Maybe should have let them secede then.

To the downvoter - it's at least a fun thought experiment. It's not likely that both of the resulting nations would have destroyed their own manufacturing base and sold their middle class out to third world countries.

1
WooseTheMoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why cede ground to the communists?

4
BoberFett 4 points ago +4 / -0

Maybe you haven't noticed, but you've ceded the entire country to communists.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
aaafirefly123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually there is one completely blue state:

Massachusetts (the only mainland us state to go completely blue in 2016 and 2020).

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
HerbertBailBondsh 1 point ago +1 / -0

Home of the 1974 Anti busing riots!!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
AmericanJawa 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe should have let them secede then.

You'd just reward their temper tantrum by giving them half the country?

2
BoberFett 2 points ago +3 / -1

Instead they have the whole country. Great plan.

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

It isn’t that likely? We have Canada as another example. Just about every western majority white country on earth is doing this.

-1
GodEmperor2024 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Almost looks like it's a global group that wants to conquer the world, and not just the Democrats. And if this group hates White people, it must be a group based on a specific ethnicity. Just thinking out loud here.

1
WildStar 1 point ago +1 / -0

And after a grace period just long enough for real Americans to pack their shit and GTFO, close it up completely. No Visas, No immigration from the Soviet states. Let them starve in the 'utopia' they chose.

4
DrCowboyPresident 4 points ago +6 / -2

Lol who invaded who then?

Who imported immigrants, gave them a gun, and sent them south?

1
kornesque 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pfft, this is just their newest flavor of not pretending.

37
Whoopies_tds 37 points ago +37 / -0

They've been doing that on lower courts for decades. The PA Supreme Court may as well be part of the DNC

11
Handshake2 11 points ago +11 / -0

Same thing with NY.

26
SuperFreedomMan 26 points ago +26 / -0

They want more white-hating non-whites on the SCOTUS.

11
MagneticArm 11 points ago +16 / -5

The only way to save America is to realize whites, and only whites can create a just and free society.

The fact that people can open their eyes to such a reality shows how far down the drain they have gone.

6
GodEmperor2024 6 points ago +8 / -2

And then you need you realize who is actually White and who only pretends to be White to subvert us, but isn't White.

-1
MagneticArm -1 points ago +1 / -2

Lol they are easily identified with the mind switch above

2
corntortilla 2 points ago +2 / -0

Clarence Thomas would like a word.

20
SteelDriver 20 points ago +20 / -0

The statute would immediately relegate conservative Justice Clarence Thomas to senior status, clearing the way for president Biden to elevate another progressive to the bench.

The bill is unpalatable, anyway, but they didn't even try to throw the tiny carrot of grandfathering existing justices in. Thanks, but no thanks.

8
Zepp87 8 points ago +8 / -0

They also aren't putting limits in for themselves. Almost as if it's a pure power grab

16
PatriotSkorzeny 16 points ago +17 / -1

Biden isn’t the president.

Not one single action this “admin” takes is legal.

It fact, every time they do anything other then arrest and prosecute the 2020 Election Treason, they commit another crime.

I’m not gonna act like the current crop of elected is legitimate. They are not.

Fraud vitiates everything.

3
baseballs 3 points ago +3 / -0

200 million graves in asia

0
Kvetch_Detector 0 points ago +4 / -4

This.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
12
Groundpounder 12 points ago +12 / -0

The forces controlling the democrat party hate everything that is America

7
S8-10 7 points ago +7 / -0

They have replaced "traditional american values" with their phony ones. Atheism, communism, lgtbq+ any kind of debauchery including pedos, climate change and globalism have replaced God, federalism, the family, Christianity, and patriotism. So they still appeal to "our universal values" but they dont mean the same thing as us when we say it. The American conservative has more in common with Saudi Arabia or the Taliban than the modern democrat

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Groundpounder 1 point ago +1 / -0

I choose none of those poisons, but I think I get your point

8
Zoinks 8 points ago +8 / -0

Term limits for justices are unconstitutional. Article III. It doesn't explicitly say lifetime appointments but in a roundabout way it is insinuated. This wouldn't stand.

7
Pepe_longcockings 7 points ago +7 / -0

Term limits for congress first, maybe then i’d consider term limits for SCOTUS with the exception being existing justices are exempt.

The real problem is congressional republicans approving activist diversity hires instead of rejecting them

13
TickleTh1sElmo 13 points ago +13 / -0

No term limits for Justices. Being a Justice for life needs to remain. Otherwise, rulings are more likely to change with public opinion instead of being based on the Constitution. Justices aren't supposed to represent the public. That's the job of Congress.

5
559throw 5 points ago +5 / -0

And yet they refused cases strictly because of public opinion...

1
TickleTh1sElmo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree with you on that however.

1
Basedsliceofwinning 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, the president picking the Justice and then the Senate having to approve, but then the Judge is for life, absolutely has to stay that way.

It's checks and balances going in every direction practically. Although now, to those in power, it's all a numbers game of who has more senate seats so they can push through whoever they want. Even if that person can't define woman.

7
OldZilla 7 points ago +7 / -0

How many Jackson's we need on the Supremes? 5?

3
JooktzII 3 points ago +3 / -0

Teeheee

4
Pelosiwashammered 4 points ago +4 / -0

How bout we just keep John Robert's off the Lolita Express so he can't be blackmailed.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
daFFYDOOK 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hang dems high now and come halloween they will be great decorations.

4
Id10tech 4 points ago +4 / -0

The power they are trying to achieve is easier to obtain than to disassemble.

3
sobriquet 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, you can vote yourself into tyranny, but you have to shoot your way out. ☹️

3
sweeswee14 3 points ago +3 / -0

These are very sick and twisted people. The desperation has risen to new heights. Open law breaking doesn't even give them pause anymore. People are going to start being murdered. We are literally at war with foreign controlled traitors.

3
eupraxia128 3 points ago +3 / -0

unConstitutional.

Any RINO who signs ANYTHING written by a Democrat deserves to lose their seat immediately.

3
CaptainButthurt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wouldn't this violate Article 3 section 1? Not that we aren't already in a Post-Constitutional Era anyway...

3
Wupta 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Democratic Party must be completely annihilated.

3
DoozerChuck 3 points ago +3 / -0

"We didn't get our way, so we're are changing the rules until we do"

3rd grade politics!

2
utfanx2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why pack the court when nobody questions wetworks at the vinyard?

2
mfinlay04 2 points ago +2 / -0

Laughable when half the Senate has been in office for more than that time. When will they vote for term limits got themselves

2
tang81 2 points ago +2 / -0

Very clearly trying to target Thomas and force him out. Doubtful the court would let this kind of bill stand.

2
masterfulsky 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's new

2
mumblenuggets 2 points ago +2 / -0

If they steal the senate. It's a done deal.

2
WVboi 2 points ago +2 / -0

Couldn't the current Supreme Court rule it unconstitutional?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
GnarlyDoug 2 points ago +2 / -0

Blatantly Unconstitutional. Now, I am for a Constitutional Amendment to fix the size of the court at 9 justices, and I would not be against 18 year terms if it was staggered so that every 2 years one justice was officially replaced. That would prevent court packing, and give each president 2 justices. That being said, it has to be an amendment, they have no power to pass laws like this.

1
Nibba 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t really agree with this act, but this article went into no detail as to how if you’re guaranteed your position for x amount of time unless you willingly step down then how is it threatening the lives of the justices and how will it no longer allow the justices to make judgements based on the law rather than politics?

1
PhantomShield72 1 point ago +1 / -0

-Implying they haven't already

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
angryamerican1964 1 point ago +1 / -0

That will mean civil war

1
ShekelJa 1 point ago +1 / -0

Activists* in black robes

1
pacalis128 1 point ago +1 / -0

So get two supreme court justices for free every stolen election.

1
mercynurse 1 point ago +1 / -0

Coup d’etat in the USA on November 3, 2020

1
StopTheGlobalists 1 point ago +2 / -1

Democrats cheat at everything. It is who and what they are.

1
MythArcana 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's practically that way already! We have a few tards who are activists and can't even define what a woman is. We got the Chief Justice with Lolita Juice all over his hands. We have two proper Justices that are being persecuted for doing the right thing for the right reasons. Yeah, it's a clown show alright. Now democrats want to add 57 more clowns for a full circus? Bite me, I says. 🤡🌎

0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
2
Red37 2 points ago +4 / -2

In two weeks

0
BestTimeToBAlive 0 points ago +1 / -1

Do it.

Go for it. Destroy the country beyond a reasonable doubt so we can rebuild it from the ground up.

Fuck the communist regime installed in this nation.