Ranking her last is equivalent to ranking everyone else and not ranking her. Instant runoff can never have a person's vote count for their last-choice candidate.
Shit could be, but I'd also not trust Charlie Kirk. Best to ask the poll workers and read the instructions yourself. But seriously if they do that, what a fucking joke it's like they're trying to telegraph their fraud.
Yes they Are telling people this to try to get people to rink so they can cheat the ranking is all about cheating you actually don’t have to rank at all
Sadly Murkowski is going to win in November because of Ranked Choice Voting, pushed hard by progressives and secretly by her campaign. She will come in second to to Tshibaka by a decent margin, but will siphon enough votes away that Kelly won't get 50%.
Democrats and GOP are on the same ballot, so the Democrats are all choosing Murkowski as their second choice. When the Dem comes in third and is eliminated, all their votes go to Murkowski, pushing her to the top even though she is not the favored GOP candidate.
Patriots can do little about it, as people have floated leaving their other choices blank or ranking Murkowski like 5th. It will almost entirely come down to the Democrat actions at the polls...
It's a vote for one, jungle primary. Primary is not rank choice, the top four will go on the November ballot. Murk will get on the November ballot, she has the lefty vote, always has.
Abbott is decent, not great. He did some good work with the anti-abortion stuff. The bussing people to DC is also in between a RINO and MAGA. The correct solution of course is to send them back.
No election integrity. 2020 election fraud. The DS is working hard to take this state blue, it isn't for our 3 electoral votes, it's to capture our immense resources.
It's disturbingly common for people here to not realize that IRV actually benefits us in most elections, as it diminishes the effect of the split conservative vote.
In a "normal" primary + first-past-the-post system, Murkowski would probably win the R nom today with under 50%, leaving us no MAGA options in the general. In the new Alaska system, she has to beat another Republican in November.
She had 44% of the vote in 2016 with full Republican support. The only way she beats Tshibaka is if she gets a decent portion of the R vote and most of the Dem/third-party voters pick her over Tshibaka. That's not likely to happen.
There's a chance you'll find how wrong you are about "actually benefits us" in a few hours when Sarah Palin and Nick Begich III split the conservative vote in the special House election in Alaska, and a Democrat wins because of second-choice votes (probably from Begich voters who despise Palin).
Even if Palin somehow slips through (less likely), or Begich does (more likely; if Palin comes in 3rd place), the ONLY way the liberal Democrat had any chance at all was thanks to Rigged Choice Voting.
Rigged Choice Voting is designed so that liberals of both parties benefit and conservatives never win another election except in the most conservative Republican states -- of which Alaska is definitely NOT one.
That's why liberals simply adore RCV, and when they see how well it works in Alaska -- even if they lose they still came closer than they otherwise would have -- they will spend big bucks (like they did in Alaska in 2020) to get ignorant voters in other states to adopt this rigged game as well.
When Democrats find themselves losing the game, they change the rules.
'Splitting the vote' does not happen with Instant-runoff voting (IRV). What happens is that your vote gets transferred to your next most preferred candidate.
Meanwhile, in reality, those extra candidates get eliminated first and their redistributed second place votes will almost exclusively go to the incumbents. Putting a loss for the incumbent into the win column after redistribution.
Retarded faggots like you need to get lost. Show up, cast your vote, but you're too stupid to contribute beyond that.
Conservatives only vote republican. Some vote libertarian. They hate each other though, so would only vote once.
Leftists have a half dozen different parties at minimum. They rank them all but ignore the conservative parties. So all those votes get recounted to the Democrat.
If RCV goes into effect, Democrats will ALWAYS win.
You realize that IRV actually helps us here? Murkowski would probably win a first-past-the-post Republican primary right now, but once it's narrowed down to 2 R candidates we have a better shot of beating her (especially considering most third-party voters won't be going to Murkowski as their #2.)
It works like this. I vote 3rd party as my first choice, Murkowski second and D last. 3rd party doesn’t get enough votes to matter so all the 3rd party votes get redistributed. Murkowski takes my vote and others who voted similar to me, and she wins as a second place.
How is this not voter disenfranchisement? Other people get 3 votes while you get one? What if I only want one candidate? There are so many things wrong with this system...
By not picking a second choice you remove yourself. If your first choice gets eliminated, you've said you don't care who wins amongst the others. If that doesn't describe you, pick other choices. It's not rocket science, but it is being gamed by democrats and RINOs.
We need to expose Murkowski as the terrible shitbag ofa human she is before the general election. Democrats should want to vote for AIDS before putting Murkowski anywhere on their ballot.
Surprise...Murkowski wins the general election as a write in candidate, with unprecedented levels of turn out from small rural communities, just like she did last time she lost the primary to a Tea Party conservative.
The re-election rate is gross for what should be easy defeats of many of these lizard people (Murkowski) from the swamp. The incumbent class knows how to manipulate the system which they designed to tip scales in their favor. Decades of making special interests rich thanks to Murkowski is the biggest obstacle, hence her best weapon. Not many incumbents fall victim to new blood. This must stop if we are to take back the country from evil.
I like Palin because she's never been shown to be a RINO and she's demonstrated that she can get elected in Alaska. Somebody needs to get Murkowski out of that seat and even if they are a RINO there's a low chance it will be worse. She's been supportive of MAGA in recent years, as far as I know.
She was McCain's running mate for the same reason any candidate chooses any VP for their ticket...To round it out. She was good for McCain in the same way Pence was good for Trump...They appeal to people in the base the candidate does not.
You can do what you want, but I never stopped liking Palin since there's never been any real reason to besides the TV saying so. Probably because I understand how politics go. There is no "we". Fuck off.
Yeah because the deep state sticks their puppets in the frozen tundra state with 25 voters as governors, hockey moms, and grandmothers for a decade and a half before springing them. The really really deep long game. Lol
I told you why they selected her and none of it was random. I can't guarantee she won't be s RINO but, from anything she's actually done, there's nothing that indicates that she will be. Your superstitious hysteria about her being on that ticket wasn't that. Besides not necessarily being ready for the national stage, she was preferable to McCain. None of that is bad.
AK! I remember you well from your wonderful welcomes to a worker bee in 1989!
Many calls singing "ALASKA!" to anyone I knew who would tolerate my voice haha!
Gorgeous state but even more gorgeous people!
I was so thrilled to watch you welcome GEOTUS to a rally!
Rise up, Alaska!!!!
Send Murk back to the swamps she thrives in.
Send Sarah back and forth to DC for she will be your voice of prosperity as she has been before! I've watched Sarah in person and she is wonderful!
VOTE WITH TRUMP CANDIDATES!
Rise again on the power of your people!
VOTE GOP! and send the dems running off the ship like the lemmings that white wolves chase!
I am hoping Murkowski loses keep in mind she lost before in a primary and she is one of the few politicians to get elected after she lost her primary in a write in campaign.
I am hoping the people of Alaska are sick of her but to win in a write in campaign means people in a majority went out of their way to write her name in at the ballot box. I think that’s why so many republicans don’t cross her is because she was elected by mandate of the people which is rare.
I’m hoping the people had enough of here but we shall not know until the general election if history repeats itself
Pretty sure she won that by fraud, not by mandate. If 2020 taught us anything, it's that these corrupt election fuckbags will go to any lengths to keep the swamp in power.
Didn't it get recently exposed that they introduced ranked choice voting specifically to ensure that Murkowski will remain in office and never get the boot?
I don't think there's a realistic chance Cheney survives the primary, but Murkowski...they have the whole system magically changed there to make sure she'll be on the ballot November, pretty much no matter what, so that she can get all the Dem votes to block a MAGA candidate, essentially giving Democrats veto power over the result of Republican primaries.
What do you call a candidate who wins because all the Democrats vote for them to prevent a Republican from getting into office? A Democrat. Murkowski is, at this point, functionally a Democrat for every realistic purpose.
No, ranked choice/instant runoff voting is not illegal. I have no idea why you'd think something like that. The amount of misinformation surrounding IRV on this site is astounding sometimes.
She has never won an election up here with more that %50 of the vote.
2016 U.S. Senate
CANDIDATE PARTY VOTES PCT.
Lisa Murkowski*
Republican
138,149 44.5%
Joe Miller
Libertarian
90,825 29.2
Margaret Stock
Independent
41,194 13.3
Others
40,567 13.1
100% reporting (442
2010-This was the year she lost the Republican Primary in Alaska and ran a write in campaign with the name Murkowski and won...here are the results of that:
Senate 100% reporting
Candidate Party Votes Pct.
Ak-murkowski
Murkowski
— 101,091 39.3%
Joe Miller
Rep. 90,860 35.3%
Scott T. McAdams
Dem. 60,053 23.3%
Murkowski (contested)
— 2,035 0.8%
David Haase
Lib. 1,459 0.6%
Tim Carter
— 927 0.4%
Other Write-Ins
— 612 0.2%
Ted Gianoutsos
— 458 0.2%
Senate Big Board | Senate Map | Race Profile
Lead
Win
2004 Alaska US senate election results:
UNITED STATES SENATE – GOP HOLD
Lisa Murkowski (R-inc) – 149,773 – 48.58%
Tony Knowles (D) – 140,424 – 45.55%
Marc J. Millican (I) – 8,885 – 2.88%
Jerry Sanders (AI) – 3,785 – 1.23%
Jim Sykes (G) – 3,053 – 0.99%
Scott A. Kohlhaas (L) – 1,240 – 0.40%
Ted ‘Big’ Gianoutsos (I) – 732 – 0.24%
Write-ins – 423 – 0.14%
Total Votes – 308,315 – 100.00%
2002 is the year Governor Frank Murkowski appointed his daughter Lisa Murkowski to fill his own U.S. Senate seat made vacant when he resigned from the Senate after being elected governor.
I voted in all of those elections and not once for Murkowski. She is like dog shit that you can't get off of your shoe....believe me there are a lot of us up here trying and again she has NEVER WON AN ELECTION WITH MORE THAN %50 OF THE VOTE.....Ya it sucks.
I always thought you shouldn't vote if you don't know what you're voting for. If I don't know all of the options, but I know maga is the most American, it is easy to pick the first choice. If there is no maga on the ballot, I don't vote.
So how do you do ranked choice in that scenario? Just vote for the maga candidate and ignore the rest? Will they void your vote at that point for not playing their game?
This is a primary election today. A voter can only pick one candidate. The top four candidates will advance to the mid term where ranked choice voting will be in place for the November mid term. There will also be a Ranked choice election today for the remainder of Don Young’s term who passed away….included today is also a primary for a full term in the house, with the top four advancing to the mid terms in November.
Native Corps are backing the dem first, murky second. Murky makes it past the primary but won’t get enough first choice votes to win the general. Also, just don’t rank murky, rank a write in.
RANK MURKOWSKI LAST
Just don't rank her, you don't have to rank them all and they don't get the vote if you don't rank them.
This is correct.
Do not rank Murkowski at all.
Faux News has Kelly at the very bottom of their long list of candidates.
You have to select "Show more candidates" to even see her.
Ranking her last is equivalent to ranking everyone else and not ranking her. Instant runoff can never have a person's vote count for their last-choice candidate.
Charlie Kirk was saying that you HAVE to rank all three or it’s a spoiled ballot.
Nope, the instructions specifically say that a single vote is legal.
Go watch the veritas video. If you don't rank all three It spoils the whole ballot
I don't need a video, this go round there was no RCV for the senate race.
Yea it was!
Shit could be, but I'd also not trust Charlie Kirk. Best to ask the poll workers and read the instructions yourself. But seriously if they do that, what a fucking joke it's like they're trying to telegraph their fraud.
Shut up rank Murk last and you will be sure it won’t be spoiled. Poll workers are often democrats.
Charlie Kirk banged your Mom.
Yes they Are telling people this to try to get people to rink so they can cheat the ranking is all about cheating you actually don’t have to rank at all
No!
Sadly Murkowski is going to win in November because of Ranked Choice Voting, pushed hard by progressives and secretly by her campaign. She will come in second to to Tshibaka by a decent margin, but will siphon enough votes away that Kelly won't get 50%.
Democrats and GOP are on the same ballot, so the Democrats are all choosing Murkowski as their second choice. When the Dem comes in third and is eliminated, all their votes go to Murkowski, pushing her to the top even though she is not the favored GOP candidate.
Patriots can do little about it, as people have floated leaving their other choices blank or ranking Murkowski like 5th. It will almost entirely come down to the Democrat actions at the polls...
It's a vote for one, jungle primary. Primary is not rank choice, the top four will go on the November ballot. Murk will get on the November ballot, she has the lefty vote, always has.
Ranked choice.
"I didn't win but I won!1!"
Unfuckingbelivable.
worst voting system ever. Alaska is a red state how is this shit still in place?
Red State means what?
Romney
Bush
Sasse
Murkowski
Cheney
Abbot
Ducey
Graham
Ryan
Crenshaw
Every state legislature that certified Biden electors.
Republicans suck. Red State politicians take our money and fuck us over for the neocon/neolib uniparty.
Abbott is decent, not great. He did some good work with the anti-abortion stuff. The bussing people to DC is also in between a RINO and MAGA. The correct solution of course is to send them back.
You can volunteer your services.
It’s what Kari Lake has already promised to do, if you’re familiar with who she is.
I am very very familiar with what Kari Lake has promised to do. I watch the MAGA rallies.
yeh we have near zero political representation
There's a difference between RINO states and red states.
There is no Republican there is only RINO cuck.
Biden is in the Whitehouse and it could never have happened without the Republican party putting him there.
No election integrity. 2020 election fraud. The DS is working hard to take this state blue, it isn't for our 3 electoral votes, it's to capture our immense resources.
Exactly. Alaska is fucked. I cannot believe they are doing that ranked choice bs.
Juneau is full of commie boomers.
See Maine Cong. district 2 -- exactly that happened.
EDIT: Clarify what "that" refers to:
It's disturbingly common for people here to not realize that IRV actually benefits us in most elections, as it diminishes the effect of the split conservative vote.
In a "normal" primary + first-past-the-post system, Murkowski would probably win the R nom today with under 50%, leaving us no MAGA options in the general. In the new Alaska system, she has to beat another Republican in November.
She had 44% of the vote in 2016 with full Republican support. The only way she beats Tshibaka is if she gets a decent portion of the R vote and most of the Dem/third-party voters pick her over Tshibaka. That's not likely to happen.
There's a chance you'll find how wrong you are about "actually benefits us" in a few hours when Sarah Palin and Nick Begich III split the conservative vote in the special House election in Alaska, and a Democrat wins because of second-choice votes (probably from Begich voters who despise Palin).
Even if Palin somehow slips through (less likely), or Begich does (more likely; if Palin comes in 3rd place), the ONLY way the liberal Democrat had any chance at all was thanks to Rigged Choice Voting.
Rigged Choice Voting is designed so that liberals of both parties benefit and conservatives never win another election except in the most conservative Republican states -- of which Alaska is definitely NOT one.
That's why liberals simply adore RCV, and when they see how well it works in Alaska -- even if they lose they still came closer than they otherwise would have -- they will spend big bucks (like they did in Alaska in 2020) to get ignorant voters in other states to adopt this rigged game as well.
When Democrats find themselves losing the game, they change the rules.
'Splitting the vote' does not happen with Instant-runoff voting (IRV). What happens is that your vote gets transferred to your next most preferred candidate.
I dunno. Seems like a way for the incumbent to stay in power no matter what. Convenient.
That's exactly what it is. Ranked voting is only for the retarded "clever boy" crowd that can't comprehend why their ideas always fail.
Ranked voting benefits incumbents, not insurgent candidates. Support it if you never want to take back the party.
It's the same retarded logic that convinced people that the 17th amendment would increase their influence.
You have it backwards. It benefits newcomers more because people will select them as their first choice and old party or incumbents more.
Meanwhile, in reality, those extra candidates get eliminated first and their redistributed second place votes will almost exclusively go to the incumbents. Putting a loss for the incumbent into the win column after redistribution.
Retarded faggots like you need to get lost. Show up, cast your vote, but you're too stupid to contribute beyond that.
Being eliminated first means that they had the least number of votes as preferred, which means that they never had a chance.
That is simple, retard.
No it doesn't you retarded faggot.
Conservatives only vote republican. Some vote libertarian. They hate each other though, so would only vote once.
Leftists have a half dozen different parties at minimum. They rank them all but ignore the conservative parties. So all those votes get recounted to the Democrat.
If RCV goes into effect, Democrats will ALWAYS win.
It didn’t fucking benefit us in Alaska tonight. Republicans got 61% of the vote tonight but lost the seat to a Democrat.
Rank choice though. How could you allow that? Might as well hand the Democrats blank ballots and a programmable voting machine.
That’s what we do, isn’t it?
You realize that IRV actually helps us here? Murkowski would probably win a first-past-the-post Republican primary right now, but once it's narrowed down to 2 R candidates we have a better shot of beating her (especially considering most third-party voters won't be going to Murkowski as their #2.)
wrong dude. there is no republican primary. this is a jungle primary and most of the demonrats will rank her 2nd
That’s the grift.
I never said there was. I was talking about a hypothetical if the ballot measure in 2020 failed.
But apparently you lack reading comprehension.
that's not how it works.
"Should" is a blue pilled term.
It works like this. I vote 3rd party as my first choice, Murkowski second and D last. 3rd party doesn’t get enough votes to matter so all the 3rd party votes get redistributed. Murkowski takes my vote and others who voted similar to me, and she wins as a second place.
Trump disagrees.
No offense but Murkowski's lieutenants are on video laughing at us over allowing IRV because they know they can use it to cheat.
Only choose one candidate! F their ranked choice fraud.
The ballot counts, but if your single pick is eliminated, then your ballot is discarded.
How is this not voter disenfranchisement? Other people get 3 votes while you get one? What if I only want one candidate? There are so many things wrong with this system...
By not picking a second choice you remove yourself. If your first choice gets eliminated, you've said you don't care who wins amongst the others. If that doesn't describe you, pick other choices. It's not rocket science, but it is being gamed by democrats and RINOs.
Rank the democrat second, Murkowski last
There are no democrats it’s a primary
We need to expose Murkowski as the terrible shitbag ofa human she is before the general election. Democrats should want to vote for AIDS before putting Murkowski anywhere on their ballot.
She’s already been exposed. The only reason she’s still in office is because of fraud.
Surprise...Murkowski wins the general election as a write in candidate, with unprecedented levels of turn out from small rural communities, just like she did last time she lost the primary to a Tea Party conservative.
And the signatures will be 100% “ legit “
I'll dance a little jig if she pulls this off.
The re-election rate is gross for what should be easy defeats of many of these lizard people (Murkowski) from the swamp. The incumbent class knows how to manipulate the system which they designed to tip scales in their favor. Decades of making special interests rich thanks to Murkowski is the biggest obstacle, hence her best weapon. Not many incumbents fall victim to new blood. This must stop if we are to take back the country from evil.
Also, why didn't Palin run for Senate instead of house?
In Alaska there’s only 1 district in the house. I’m sure that is a factor
I like Palin because she's never been shown to be a RINO and she's demonstrated that she can get elected in Alaska. Somebody needs to get Murkowski out of that seat and even if they are a RINO there's a low chance it will be worse. She's been supportive of MAGA in recent years, as far as I know.
She was McCain's running mate for the same reason any candidate chooses any VP for their ticket...To round it out. She was good for McCain in the same way Pence was good for Trump...They appeal to people in the base the candidate does not.
You can do what you want, but I never stopped liking Palin since there's never been any real reason to besides the TV saying so. Probably because I understand how politics go. There is no "we". Fuck off.
Yeah because the deep state sticks their puppets in the frozen tundra state with 25 voters as governors, hockey moms, and grandmothers for a decade and a half before springing them. The really really deep long game. Lol
I told you why they selected her and none of it was random. I can't guarantee she won't be s RINO but, from anything she's actually done, there's nothing that indicates that she will be. Your superstitious hysteria about her being on that ticket wasn't that. Besides not necessarily being ready for the national stage, she was preferable to McCain. None of that is bad.
It's Ice Floe Time for RINO Murkowski.
Uh, today is the primary. The top 4 advance to the general. Guaranteed both Tshibaka and Murkowski advance.
Alaska is rino central..
AK! I remember you well from your wonderful welcomes to a worker bee in 1989! Many calls singing "ALASKA!" to anyone I knew who would tolerate my voice haha!
Gorgeous state but even more gorgeous people!
I was so thrilled to watch you welcome GEOTUS to a rally!
Rise up, Alaska!!!!
Send Murk back to the swamps she thrives in.
Send Sarah back and forth to DC for she will be your voice of prosperity as she has been before! I've watched Sarah in person and she is wonderful!
VOTE WITH TRUMP CANDIDATES!
Rise again on the power of your people!
VOTE GOP! and send the dems running off the ship like the lemmings that white wolves chase!
God bless you Alaska!
I am hoping Murkowski loses keep in mind she lost before in a primary and she is one of the few politicians to get elected after she lost her primary in a write in campaign.
I am hoping the people of Alaska are sick of her but to win in a write in campaign means people in a majority went out of their way to write her name in at the ballot box. I think that’s why so many republicans don’t cross her is because she was elected by mandate of the people which is rare.
I’m hoping the people had enough of here but we shall not know until the general election if history repeats itself
It's a top-4 primary, she only needs 20%ish first place votes to advance. She will almost inevitably be one of two R candidates listed in November.
Pretty sure she won that by fraud, not by mandate. If 2020 taught us anything, it's that these corrupt election fuckbags will go to any lengths to keep the swamp in power.
Didn't it get recently exposed that they introduced ranked choice voting specifically to ensure that Murkowski will remain in office and never get the boot?
I voted for Kelly, Palin, and Dunleavy. Didn’t do the rank nonsence- that’s just their way of cheating
Get that damn woman out, Out, OUT! Nothing is worse than some plant in your party voting with the other side on each and every issue.
I don't think there's a realistic chance Cheney survives the primary, but Murkowski...they have the whole system magically changed there to make sure she'll be on the ballot November, pretty much no matter what, so that she can get all the Dem votes to block a MAGA candidate, essentially giving Democrats veto power over the result of Republican primaries.
What do you call a candidate who wins because all the Democrats vote for them to prevent a Republican from getting into office? A Democrat. Murkowski is, at this point, functionally a Democrat for every realistic purpose.
Didn't she lose her primary last time and ran as a write in candidate?
No, ranked choice/instant runoff voting is not illegal. I have no idea why you'd think something like that. The amount of misinformation surrounding IRV on this site is astounding sometimes.
He asked a question to clarify, dumb ass. It SHOULD be illegal, it's stupid as hell.
It certainly smacks of voter disenfranchisement
Alaskans are fucking dumb, they will most certainly vote for cunt Murkowski again
She has never won an election up here with more that %50 of the vote.
2016 U.S. Senate CANDIDATE PARTY VOTES PCT. Lisa Murkowski* Republican 138,149 44.5% Joe Miller Libertarian 90,825 29.2 Margaret Stock Independent 41,194 13.3 Others 40,567 13.1 100% reporting (442
2010-This was the year she lost the Republican Primary in Alaska and ran a write in campaign with the name Murkowski and won...here are the results of that: Senate 100% reporting Candidate Party Votes Pct. Ak-murkowski Murkowski — 101,091 39.3% Joe Miller Rep. 90,860 35.3% Scott T. McAdams Dem. 60,053 23.3% Murkowski (contested) — 2,035 0.8% David Haase Lib. 1,459 0.6% Tim Carter — 927 0.4% Other Write-Ins — 612 0.2% Ted Gianoutsos — 458 0.2% Senate Big Board | Senate Map | Race Profile Lead Win
2004 Alaska US senate election results: UNITED STATES SENATE – GOP HOLD
Lisa Murkowski (R-inc) – 149,773 – 48.58%
Tony Knowles (D) – 140,424 – 45.55%
Marc J. Millican (I) – 8,885 – 2.88%
Jerry Sanders (AI) – 3,785 – 1.23%
Jim Sykes (G) – 3,053 – 0.99%
Scott A. Kohlhaas (L) – 1,240 – 0.40%
Ted ‘Big’ Gianoutsos (I) – 732 – 0.24%
Write-ins – 423 – 0.14%
Total Votes – 308,315 – 100.00%
2002 is the year Governor Frank Murkowski appointed his daughter Lisa Murkowski to fill his own U.S. Senate seat made vacant when he resigned from the Senate after being elected governor.
I voted in all of those elections and not once for Murkowski. She is like dog shit that you can't get off of your shoe....believe me there are a lot of us up here trying and again she has NEVER WON AN ELECTION WITH MORE THAN %50 OF THE VOTE.....Ya it sucks.
Murkowski is the Liz Cheney of Alaska
I may be alone here but I'm not very confident in Alaska
Doesn't AK have some weirdo rules where multiple candidates qualify for the general? I heard traitor Lisa is a lock to survive today.
I always thought you shouldn't vote if you don't know what you're voting for. If I don't know all of the options, but I know maga is the most American, it is easy to pick the first choice. If there is no maga on the ballot, I don't vote.
So how do you do ranked choice in that scenario? Just vote for the maga candidate and ignore the rest? Will they void your vote at that point for not playing their game?
Voters are not required to rank more than one candidate. If you vote for only one candidate, it will count.
Murkowski is Feinstein's bitch.
Does Alaska only have hot women?
This is a primary election today. A voter can only pick one candidate. The top four candidates will advance to the mid term where ranked choice voting will be in place for the November mid term. There will also be a Ranked choice election today for the remainder of Don Young’s term who passed away….included today is also a primary for a full term in the house, with the top four advancing to the mid terms in November.
Native Corps are backing the dem first, murky second. Murky makes it past the primary but won’t get enough first choice votes to win the general. Also, just don’t rank murky, rank a write in.
Seriously...where are the dudes in Alaska.
Not against women leaders I just haven't seen it in Alaska in quite a bit.
Hoping for the best, but I won't be surprised if fuckery succeeds. These swamp jackasses rig shit to keep their power.
Get in your fuckin canoes or your water hoppers and sleds and go vote ya buncha damn Eskimos
I think Murkowski is primary proof. Last time they removed her via primary, she won on a miracle write in campaign.
Make MAGA PROUD ! GO ALASKA