2128
Comments (399)
sorted by:
66
coolhandcuke 66 points ago +66 / -0

I remember when Jean Claude Van Damme had an action movie out, he explained that he played twins and one was "sensiteeve" and one wasn't. I found this hilarious.

41
Lord_Nekro 41 points ago +41 / -0

"I would never in my life be caught wearing black silk underwear"

34
NotoriousCIC 34 points ago +35 / -1

It made my night that you have watched and appreciated Double Impact and can quote it. 😂

54
Lord_Nekro 54 points ago +54 / -0

90s kid man, I must have watched every JCVD movie 500 times

My favorite line is

"Maybe I'm drunk today, tomorrow I'll be sober BUT YOU WILL ALWAYS BE A FAGGOT!"

27
TommyLasordasBallBag 27 points ago +27 / -0

That was a play on one of Winston's quotes

“Sir, you are drunk.” “And you, Bessie, are ugly. But I shall be sober in the morning, and you will still be ugly.”

16
okboomer59 16 points ago +16 / -0

reminds me of one from PJ O'Rourke

The Wit and Wisdom of Winston Churchill

At a diplomatic reception in New York, Margaret Dumont said "Sir, your cigar is most offensive," to which he instantly replied, "Fuck you."

11
TommyLasordasBallBag 11 points ago +11 / -0

Dude was a savage.. for a bloody brit

7
Marshall2 7 points ago +7 / -0

That was his American Half (Mother).

1
okboomer59 1 point ago +1 / -0

his mother was American

14
Pappy_Gunn 14 points ago +14 / -0

Or: Would you sleep with me for a million pounds? Yes I suppose I would. How about 5 pounds? Of course not, what kind of womam do you think I am? We've already established that, we are just negotiating the price.

16
westrock2000 16 points ago +16 / -0

The 80’s had quotes like “I used to fuck guys like you in prison”.

That was an insult back then (admittedly a bad one), but today it would be seen as a compliment.

9
airborne3502 9 points ago +9 / -0

Road House.

I stop whatever I'm doing and watch it whenever it comes on.

6
FaustyArchaeus 6 points ago +7 / -1

Always have time for Road House

4
CrenshawMAGAt 4 points ago +4 / -0

Billy Batts

6
airborne3502 6 points ago +6 / -0

I like when the one brother is thinking about his twin, putting it to his girlfriend, and getting more and more upset about it.

5
Lord_Nekro 5 points ago +5 / -0

That was right before this line lol

4
FakeNametag 4 points ago +4 / -0

The sensitive one was the cuck thinking about his Chad brother giving the girl the business (and she was enjoying it)

3
wiombims 3 points ago +3 / -0

we need a context bot

5
KernalMustard 5 points ago +5 / -0

Used to do a double feature(no pun intended) Double impact and Marked for Death in the 90's on VHS.

3
Ocrazio-Cortez 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm sure Churchill said something to that effect to another MP way back when.

4
jdog 4 points ago +4 / -0

What a classic. I too also appreciate the quote

1
DesertRebel 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why not, feels really nice, specially when the babe rubs on it :-)

1
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 1 point ago +1 / -0

What about on screen?

10
Kpak76 10 points ago +10 / -0

I remember that movie. They both did some ass kicking. JCVD is a true American success story.

9
Lord_Nekro 9 points ago +9 / -0

Hell yeah, got all coked up in Thailand and nailed Prime Kylie Minogue

6
airborne3502 6 points ago +6 / -0

I dated a girl who threw him out of a theater in Thousand Oaks, California.

4
Lord_Nekro 4 points ago +4 / -0

Chuck Zito kicked his ass too

6
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 6 points ago +6 / -0

I bet the people who threw PeeWee Herman out brag about it too.

2
Herpawinski 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actually they apologized and issued a statement saying he hadn't really been yanking it in public. Too late though.

1
wiombims 1 point ago +1 / -0

You like 'em thick and beefy, do ya?

5
TheTrain 5 points ago +5 / -0

Double impact bolo yung was savage in that 💪

6
Lord_Nekro 6 points ago +6 / -0

Bolo is a badass! Bruce Lee, JCVD, he's worked with the greats in some classic fight films

2
TheTrain 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed my man's been around those fucking neck muscles are insane would not like to take a dig off him ooof but love those movies good old knock your teeth out movies love it

6
MAGATRON1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hey can we appreciate "cyborg" if nothing but the post apocalyptic wardrobe and cool direction.

4
neurojerk 4 points ago +4 / -0

The shoe blade was pretty fucking cool.

3
TheTrain 3 points ago +3 / -0

NOTS SU COW NOTS SU COW 😂😂

1
TheTrain 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hell yeh that dude with the chain mail armour class....... FUCKEERRR that's what he says in the fight scene

1
dontmindme22 1 point ago +1 / -0

jean claude van johnson is an hilarious show..

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
55
Gregorina 55 points ago +55 / -0

Go woke go broke

36
SpezIsANazisCumRag 36 points ago +38 / -2

Remember when they were planning on making the next 007 an ugly black woman?

Well now it seems they are back tracking on that but they still want to go woke. They just realized they were going too woke too fast so this is their way of easing into it.

Don't give them a single penny! When the next Bond movie comes out either skip it or pirate it because if you support them in any way, eventually 007 will be played by an ugly full African lesbian woman.

13
ralphhero 13 points ago +13 / -0

they already ruined the equalizer tv show

4
Meddlesom 4 points ago +5 / -1

Didn't they ruin that in the conception stage? Queen Latifa? What a joke. The movie with Denzel Washington was already way over the top. He was a total mary sue in that.

1
Soundwave 1 point ago +3 / -2

No he wasn’t. What are you talking about? He hung a guy with barbed wire in the first one and killed people with a nail gun.

In the second one, he told his old crew that he was going to kill every one of them and his only regret was he was only going to get to do it once. And that’s right before he catches a ride with one of the guy’s wife and kid to let them know there is absolutely nothing they can do about it.

Did you even watch those movies? Do you even know what a Mary Sue is?

2
Meddlesom 2 points ago +5 / -3

Yeah, a mary sue is the character that never loses a fight, always has the right answer, never makes a mistake, and if he's ever about to be in trouble, some plot device lands in his hands to immediately get him out of it. Denzel was a fuckin' mary sue in The Equalizer. He was Rey from Force Awakens. He was Liam Neeson from Taken. You know that every fight he gets into in the movie, he's just going to stomp the other dudes out without breaking a sweat. You know that he's going to be just fine because he's got so much plot armor, that he could take a blast from the Death Star and shrug it off, then throw a fuckin' unsharpened pencil at the Death Star and blow it up.

The Equalizer sucked. It was over the top, completely corny bullshit with no tension because there were no stakes, because Denzel can't be touched. The only reason that fuckin' movie even exists is because they wanted to Have Denzel play Denzel and slap an "I Win" button every 15 seconds to assert his fictional, magical negro dominance over the bad guys, the good guys, you, and everyone else in the theater.

1
lerm4comptroller 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mary Sues require a number of things to qualify as such in my opinion:

Epic levels of dominance in all things with zero pitfalls, of course. More importantly, no reason for this level of skill as experience is nonexistent and they're very often--though not always--specified as being "normal" or "average" in some context. Power levelling so early and fast that it can then only be developed by contradicting/denigrating established canon or one's own story. Few if any impactful moments of self doubt, and any characters who harbor such doubts are depicted as fools. Either pure support or pure antagonism from most other characters, who are likewise depicted as being either good or bad depending on how they interact with Mary Sue and not their own actions. If it's a Mary Sue insert into established IPs, then there's a correctional aspect; suddenly known plot points aren't as originally depicted, with Mary Sue having had a previously unknown hand in their events or that they somehow now are unresolved again and must be fixed once and for all by Mary Sue.

This is why that Star Wars girl was so quickly pegged: it's so very close to the original "Mary Sue" Star Trek fanfic that it's uncanny. From what I recall, Washington's and Neeson's characters were retired special agents or some such bs, and characters were allowed to disagree without immediately being depicted as a bad guy. These aren't Mary Sues; just poorly written heroes with offscreen backstories. Merely having plot armor and magic powers isn't enough, or about half of the main characters in the history of fiction qualify.

Good rule of thumb to look out for: the vast majority of Mary Sues are new characters introduced later in the life of already existing IPs being milked to death by copyright holders, and are almost always boring looking young women with brown hair.

0
Meddlesom 0 points ago +1 / -1

The Equalizer is an existing IP. It was a television show before it was a movie. McCall wasn't a perfect, infallible character in the show. Denzel was in the movie. He was a mary sue.

1
TypicalWhitePerson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude, give it a rest. You just described every Die Hard, Arnold, Stallone movie ever. They're called action heroes and that is how it goes. If the guy died, it wouldn't be much fun.

1
Meddlesom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Totally wrong.

John McClane gets beat up, shredded feet, has to work for it in a fist fight to win, has to retreat and regroup several times and outthink his opponents.

Rambo gets run out of town, arrested, has to face his inner demons from his war trauma, and then heavily arms himself to fight back.

Conan gets beat up, has to train more, regroup, has to get the help of other fighters, and then defeats Thulsa Doom.

Maverick fucks up in a training exercise and gets his co-pilot killed, then has to overcome that to become the best.

Luke Skywalker gets beat up by tusken raiders, beat up in a bar, beat up by a tentacle monster, but uses teamwork and specific callbacks to previous skills to navigate the death star trench and blow it up.

Denzel in The Equalizer never gets touched. He's never at a disadvantage. He's completely untouchable. Completely infallible. Perfect in everything he does. He breezes through every encounter without breaking a sweat, solo, against an army of mafia fixers and all sorts of professional criminals. Even the Terminator got knocked down a few times. He's a fuckin mary sue, and the movie was totally unbelievable. Do you not understand the difference between an action hero and a mary sue?

Maybe when you think of those other movies, you're actually thinking of the Hot Shots Part Deux parody of them with a kill counter on the screen.

0
Soundwave 0 points ago +1 / -1

Oh I see. If an idiot goes on a long enough rant he’ll finally tell you what he really has a problem with. You don’t like the fact that he’s black. What a moron.

0
Meddlesom 0 points ago +1 / -1

By focusing on only that, you have outed yourself as an actual racist.

4
zooty 4 points ago +4 / -0

I actually have only watched one since Dalton started. It just wasn't very interesting TBH.

8
Rope_Tree_Journalist 8 points ago +8 / -0

I really liked Brosnan in his 007 debut, GoldenEye. Every single successive film after was lamer and lamer. I really liked Craig in his 007 debut, Casino Royale. Every single successive film after that was longer, and boringer, and lamer.

1
zooty 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bond to me was slightly campy fun with cool gadgets. With Dalton, they made it more grounded (though still a bit dumb) which didn't appeal as much to me.

4
conservativefrank 4 points ago +4 / -0

Remember, Sean Connery would often seek out someone who had wronged him, kill that person. His Bond was ruthless.

3
rebuildingMyself 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah it was a super-bold move to try and replace a well-known white male figure for over half a century with an atrocious manly-looking black woman. They have to go the Obama route and wokify these things in stages. First it's half-black man, then fully-black, then muh strong-huwhite feminist who dont' need no man, then finally atrocious black woman.

17
d003 17 points ago +17 / -0

bond begins hormone therapy, gets testicle removal surgery (neutered). wants to keep his dick, just doesn't know which way he wants to swing it, yet, so he's hoping the surgeon can move it to the backside

8
publius1788 8 points ago +11 / -3

Isn't that a myth at this point? They have putting out this woke shit for almost a decade now and seemingly do not intend to stop. They just put out a movie "The Woman King" glorifying a band of black woman warriors that enslaved their fellow Africans. They left out the slavery part and just focused on the "African girl bosses" and apparently it's doing very well box office wise.

10
flashersenpai 10 points ago +10 / -0

Female Ghostbusters? She Hulk? Bat Girl? etc

Hollywood has like a 100 year backlog of profits. It's not going to crash overnight, even if the likes of a mega corpo like Disney had a bad time this year in Florida.

They have many billions to spend, but what exactly do they have to show for it? Does Thor: Love and Thunder strike you as a cultural phenomenon? The last Bond movie? The woke Charlies Angels? The new Lord of the Rings?

7
publius1788 7 points ago +8 / -1

It's not only the movies. Every single institution is controlled by the enemy. They will never go broke. It's either they completely take over the culture or we fight back.

4
Meddlesom 4 points ago +5 / -1

At least Jason Reitman did it right when he made Ghostbusters Afterlife. It totally ignored the existence of Gashbusters, it paid homage to the original movie, and it wasn't woke. The male lead wasn't even an idiot! Instead he was a good natured mentor and father figure to the kids.

2
conservativefrank 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was woke BS.

1
Meddlesom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Compelling argument you make. I am convinced.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
AmericanJawa 4 points ago +6 / -2

They left out the slavery part and just focused on the "African girl bosses" and apparently it's doing very well box office wise.

It made roughly $19 million opening weekend on a $50 million budget.

That doesn't account for an unknown marketing budget.

Movie is probably going to have to make over $150 million to reach profitability.

You really think that movie is going to pull off financial success?

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
2
MaoHadOnly1Testicle 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hollywood usually gets a lot of ticket sales in China, but this movie is all about Africans, and China doesn't like black people.

1
Stover205 1 point ago +2 / -1

Woke doesn't sell well overseas.

0
AmericanJawa 0 points ago +2 / -2

How many tickets do you expect it to sell overseas, where the studio will get an even smaller portion of the profits?

0
publius1788 0 points ago +1 / -1

I am not an expert on the fucking box office idk. My main point though is these studios will never go broke. They are going to keep putting out this woke garbage no matter what. Even if they do take a hit in profits. They care more about pushing a message. But sometimes their woke garbage movies do make money. Like Knives Out which is basically a metaphor for white people being replaced by minorities. It made 10x it's budget.

2
TheImpossible1 2 points ago +4 / -2

Stop making your enemies richer.

6
publius1788 6 points ago +8 / -2

When did I say I was? You can't deny though that we have been saying "Go woke go broke" for years and it really hasn't panned out. Now we are at a point where every major corporation favors BLM and trans kids.

2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because ESG investment is propping up the woke companies.

1
Stover205 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tell that to former CEO of bed bath and beyond.

-2
TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +2 / -4

The reason it hasn't panned out is not because woke is successful.

It's because they will be destroyed and made an example of like Weinstein if they try to cross the feminist agenda. They sacrificed a Clinton ally to show that nobody will ever be loyal enough to just walk away from the agenda.

Look at CA extending the statute of limitations solely for sex crimes against adults. That's how they maintain control.

As for why Top Gun didn't - Scientology somehow has a counter for this?

3
publius1788 3 points ago +4 / -1

Every major institution is woke now. I think we need to find some way to combat this, not just hope that at some point the come back to their senses, because I see no indication they will without us forcing them to.

-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +1 / -2

They're all blackmailed.

Find a way to make rape allegations with no proof worthless. That would end this.

-5
QLARP -5 points ago +4 / -9

Top gun maverick has a multi race / lots of women in a fighter squadron.

I think you mean, have terrible writing go broke

3
RolandDelacroix 3 points ago +5 / -2

Women coukd theoretically be fighter pilots as their bodies are maybe more resistant to the forces involved, and they're smaller. Generally slower reflexes, but it's possible an exceptional woman could do it.

Anything involving force on force personal strength, nah.

3
Stover205 3 points ago +3 / -0

Women can't take G's like men. Watch films of fighter pilots practicing at 6 g's they're gasping for breath.

1
wiombims 1 point ago +1 / -0

Det iz why they pass the tests at higher rates, yes? I'd have no problem with it tbh but it seems to me like when there's only one spot and 100 applicants, dong gonna do what dong do best. Women shouldn't feel bad either: most men can't do what some men can do either. And hey, if you actually do make it, more props to you. But realistically, they'll just drop the standards to fuckall and put in mandatory ratios.

1
TheImpossible1 1 point ago +2 / -1

Top Gun didn't have women in the place where they could do the most damage.

https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/15Jn6dkTqj/heres-a-list-of-everyone-involve/c

0
QLARP 0 points ago +3 / -3

The whole squadron looked like captain planet kids

0
wiombims 0 points ago +1 / -1

Complete with homoerotic 90s stache.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Colonel_Chestbridge 1 point ago +2 / -1

You mean like the US Navy?

-2
QLARP -2 points ago +1 / -3

2%?

51
1984_is_here 51 points ago +51 / -0

Women don't want want this. I know this because I am a woman. There are some women who claim they want to see this. But then when they actually see it, it's a turn off.

Deep down in our bones we want to see Bruce Willis taking on a group of terrorists with nothing but a wife beater, bare feet, a gun, and a sarcastic comment.

23
drsowells1fan 23 points ago +23 / -0

Ditto. I don't want to see 007 cry like a pussy. I would rather see him die.

11
Apersonofinterest 11 points ago +11 / -0

He died in the last one. I don’t know how they’re going to undo that.

6
Soundwave 6 points ago +7 / -1

I don’t think those movies are meant to be a continuous story. Daniel Craig wasn’t the same James Bond as Pierce Brosnan, for example. Or Sean Connery. So the next person, whoever it is, will have a different backstory and all that.

4
UK_Pede 4 points ago +4 / -0

With a rainbow coloured 1-up mushroom by the sound of it.

2
BeefyBelisarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Same way they apparently undo his aging, or that one time he got married, by having 'James Bond' be a code name used by a long series of agents. Bonus if they bring back a previous Bond as the next M.

1
hellofellowhuman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t know how they’re going to undo that.

Very easy. Barely an inconvenience. They will simply bring him back from the dead to have him cry throughout the movie, then he kills himself at the end of the movie.

23
_Sully_ 23 points ago +23 / -0

There is a paradox that lies in most women. They want to turn their men into something they’ll like more but if they are successful they instead hate him for being weak. It’s a tale as old as time itself. Deep down women test men or as they call it now “shit test”. Feminism and wokeness are shit tests. I can only imagine what they will do with the world when they succeed.

8
RedPillosopher1776 8 points ago +8 / -0

Very accurate

5
wiombims 5 points ago +5 / -0

You don't have to imagine. Many of them are miserable cunts who work 60 hours a week to come home to a cat and a deadbeat poolboy that in a previous generation could have provided for a family of 4 with a factory job.

5
Randy42 5 points ago +5 / -0

I used to hate shit-tests, but then I realized it's one of the few tools a woman has to vet her partner. If a girl talking to you makes you break then you can't be trusted to protect and provide for her.

Also if feminists do take over they won't do shit with the world because they couldn't compete with the other patriarchies, so China would probably take over or something.

3
_Sully_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dude, feminist can't actually take over. As soon as they get to that point they will destroy everything. Leftism is feminization.

18
Pappy_Gunn 18 points ago +18 / -0

True story: There is a very succesful female asian playwright that runs plays in New York and London and other high fallutin places. I wish I could rememgber the name. She uses focus group to create characters. Of course her audience are mainly women, upper crust, lesbians, leftists etc. One time she decided to create the perfect man, in accordance with the wishes of the ladies. Sensitive, yields to women, reads poetry, self-effacing, smallish, with all the leftist qualities you can name. Opposite him was a Joe Six Pack, pretty much an uneducated dick, rude, etc. The after-action focus groups revealed that no woman liked the sensitive guy. He was a pushover, a mat, a simp, and certainly did not arouse any of the women. They like the dick a lot better, at least he had agency and a spine.

I mean who would pick up a chick in a bar? Woody Allen or Dolph Lundgren?

11
1984_is_here 11 points ago +11 / -0

I can't tell you how many times I've heard liberal women say "I know I'm not supposed to like this...but" and it's in reference to a hot, buff, guy either in a movie or portrayed in a book series. They've convinced each other that it's somehow wrong to like the muscular guy who does manly things and saves the girl. I want to scream at them. "Of course you're supposed to like the manly man who can protect you! It's genetically ingrained in us!!"

5
SomaliSwede_RapeBaby 5 points ago +5 / -0

.Reminds me of the liberal women with secret fetish/fantasies of being dominated by conservative “MAGA” men…

2
use40trackmode 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tell me more!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
12
jennyfrutex 12 points ago +12 / -0

Right???? The attractiveness of James Bond has always been his masculinity, handsomeness, and witty charm. Masculine men are profoundly attractive.

5
AmericanJawa 5 points ago +6 / -1

Bond has always been a kind of male wish fantasy fulfillment.

To 'update' him to match so-called 'modern men' kills the fantasy.

3
Meddlesom 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think the women that want it, just want to see it destroyed because it is very clearly focused on men doing men things. They don't really care otherwise.

1
Stover205 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you can't have it destroy it, so no one else can have it.

46
I_Love_45-70_Gov 46 points ago +46 / -0

Bond, Gay Bond

31
bigdickhangsright 31 points ago +31 / -0

Bond: Do you expect me to talk?

Goldfinger: Yes, Mr. Bond, I am a licensed therapist!!

10
Inquisitor_Corvus 10 points ago +10 / -0

Think of the new villains! Ass Sphincter. MonkeyPox, AIDS. The Golden Dildo. …

4
wiombims 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's like jaws, but he throws dilation balls at you until you die.

2
use40trackmode 2 points ago +2 / -0

Priceless

4
Orwellthatendswell 4 points ago +4 / -0

The name's Bond. James Bond. I go by they/them pronouns. And my star sign is Scorpio.

2
AussieTrumpFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bond. Gold Bond.

Given how much he's going to be hanging out around your genitals.

39
Desperado 39 points ago +39 / -0

I'm not evolving. At all. I'm staying the same. If you want to see me devolving just keep this shit up.

1
_deleted_ 1 point ago +2 / -1

Hijacking to say they tried the emotional Bond with Timothy Dalton. It didn't work, everyone hated it.

35
fruittypebbles 35 points ago +35 / -0

Men are devolving, not evolving.

5
Filo76 5 points ago +5 / -0

Men are not evolving. They are being indoctrinated, Brainwashed, and coerced to be something they are not. Often with deadly consequences.

26
MythArcana 26 points ago +26 / -0

I'm down to my last three Evil Dead DVDs at this point.

28
wedontneedamilitary 28 points ago +29 / -1

Bruce Campbell is a national treasure.

14
Donger-Lord2 14 points ago +14 / -0

Was very good in Burn Notice. It’s a shame all TV shows are cancerous now. Hell, I sometimes see it in the older ones. Either way, I’ll never be watching modern television every again.

9
drsowells1fan 9 points ago +9 / -0

Hard to unsee it. I once loved that show. Now I find Fiona's "I am woman hear me roar "crap insufferable.

9
MustangManny 9 points ago +9 / -0

I just watched the Quantum Leap remake; they have a non-binary gayish type guy as a programmer. All other scientists/ programmers are female. An Asian female as head of security. In the first episode the main character (Asian guy) travels back to 1985 and his female partner has to explain to him how to drive a manual transmission. Do they really think real men are going to watch this and change their nature?
I'm watching old Rockford Files reruns, what a difference in the way men were portrayed. Hell, even old Charlie's Angels re-runs are more masculine than modern shows.

10
Donger-Lord2 10 points ago +10 / -0

They can make these faggot shows all they want, there’s a reason they aren’t making money, it’s because people like me and you refuse to watch them.

3
okboomer59 3 points ago +3 / -0

Mockingbird

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

His western series, Brisco County, was fun too. Shame it never got a second season.

5
-f-b-i- 5 points ago +5 / -0

Underrated

2
MythArcana 2 points ago +2 / -0

That boy, he good!

2
Barney_Z28 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hail to the king, baby.

15
Space_Force 15 points ago +15 / -0

Shop smart, shop Fren-Mart.

2
FaustyArchaeus 2 points ago +3 / -1

I dont even have a VHS player but kept all the tapes. I am probably the only person who kept all his Segal DVDs too. Made sure I kept my Demolition man too that has a bad dub for international markets saying Pizza hut instead of Taco Bell.

https://youtu.be/STwEqxtjMCU

18
Deplorable_Citizen 18 points ago +18 / -0

I'll stick to "Goldeneye" and "The World is Not Enough", thanks.

9
Pappy_Gunn 9 points ago +9 / -0

You only live twice. A volcano lair, Blofelt with a cat, a commando raid to top it off. And Sean Connery.

1
use40trackmode 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is the best Bond movie. Fun facts: the script is by the children's author Roald Dahl, and the cinematographer was the famous Freddie Young, who photographed David Lean's films.

2
Pappy_Gunn 2 points ago +2 / -0

The bonus here is that it would probably trigger a lot of leftists when he gets disguised as a Japanese man. He looks about as Japanese as Joseph Wiseman looked asian in Dr No.

7
Meddlesom 7 points ago +7 / -0

Goldeneye remains my favorite.

2
rebuildingMyself 2 points ago +2 / -0

When I was in high school, totally did the Boris "I AM INVINCIBLE!" right in the lab when I finally got the damn code to compile

1
Meddlesom 1 point ago +1 / -0

and there's never been a better chase scene involving a tank.

5
magnokor 5 points ago +5 / -0

Timothy Dalton best James Bond.

But do accept the four Remington Steele ones after that.

Watchable. Although, the end can be seen to start, as the "diversity" gets pushed into the movies.

That Craig Daniel, not James Bond. Not watched.

2
AmericanJawa 2 points ago +4 / -2

I'm partial to Tomorrow Never Dies myself.

4
disgruntled_patriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ah. I see you too are a man of culture.

TND is woefully underrated.

And it called out the rogue media long before Trump made "fake news" a household term.

4
AmericanJawa 4 points ago +4 / -0

Crazy to think that movie with a plot about a news mogul trying to start a world war for sake of ratings would somehow become more relevant as time went on.

3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not totally unprecedented, there's allegations that the Spanish American War was sparked by fake news to sell more newspapers.

2
spyinneighbors4 2 points ago +5 / -3

Dunno those last films with Daniel Craig were exceptional. Those will be where I stop with any new film of bond.

15
Wrexxis780 15 points ago +15 / -0

Is it going to be a tranny too?

13
Mountaineer 13 points ago +13 / -0

Well they already smashed Craigbond's balls off in the first one.

4
Donger-Lord2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just as tickle.

14
Lord_Nekro 14 points ago +14 / -0

They continually try to demoralize by destroying our heroes and myths

5
BigIronBigIron 5 points ago +8 / -3

Take notice of who 'they' are.

4
deleted 4 points ago +7 / -3
-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +3 / -4

It's called a pussy hat, you can say pussy.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Broccoli

3
okboomer59 3 points ago +3 / -0

a man said when you're rich they let you grab 'em by it

so we elected him President

U S A

-2
TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +2 / -4

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Broccoli

Not sure your ideology wants us noticing this one.

4
BigIronBigIron 4 points ago +4 / -0

my ideology

lol

-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +1 / -8

muh joos

"it's women though"

REEEEEEE downvotes in femcel rage

5
BigIronBigIron 5 points ago +5 / -0

What's that word? Is that English? Don't you speak English?

-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +1 / -2

What word?

4
BigIronBigIron 4 points ago +4 / -0

All of them

2
okboomer59 2 points ago +2 / -0

looks like a portmanteau for feminist (beta simp) incel

13
Remove-All-Communist 13 points ago +13 / -0

Men are NOT evolving. We are witnessing the PUSSIFICATION of the American male. I am Gen X so I was taught to hunt, gut a white tail, remove scales from a Blue Gill, taught how to trap, held a flash light and found a wrench when asked, can work on my vehicle, have punched and have been punched in the face (too many times, in the first), know how to be respectful and most importantly, I know how to treat my elders and a lady. All the Media, Social Media and Hollywood are doing everything to turn women to men and men to women. It's all testosterone for the gals and all estrogen for the guys. Its fuct up.

We have to fix this. It's on us.

2
okboomer59 2 points ago +2 / -0

RACISM - attacking white people legally, judicially, criminally, violently, etc., stripping whites of the right to self defense, in pursuit of American replacement

essential to eradication of freedom

as long as memory survives of what we achieved here

and so neglected

the spark of freedom will continue to burn

CLASSISM - Marxist BS spewed by the CCP/WEF in popular media to distract attention from the caste system they are ruthlessly imposing

to replace contract with status

in which all property ownership will be centralized in in a cartel (or cabal)

within which all political power and control is concentrated in a single Party

SEXISM - attack men, masculinity, male sexuality, gender, the coming war on age of consent law

so ever younger children captured by social and other media

can consent to become wards of the state

emancipated from the patriarchal bourgeois phallocentrism of the gender binary

2
Soundwave 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m the same generation as you and I did none of those things. I know how to be respectful to people and can work on my car but I’ve done nothing else. And I don’t want to, either. So there’s that.

2
Suchinternet 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're certainly trying very hard to make this happen. We'll see how the youths of today turn out.

13
KnobGoblin 13 points ago +13 / -0

Watched RRR last night, Bollywood is doing masculine 1,000 times better than anything I’ve seen in this country int the last decade.

10
yunarukami 10 points ago +10 / -0

It's not Bollywood. It's Tollywood. It's a Telugu movie starring Ram Charan and NTR Jr. It's amazing that those two heroes did their own dubbing in 4 different Indian languages. If you really like Indian movies, check out KGF and Vikram (2022).

4
RolandDelacroix 4 points ago +4 / -0

Even with the dancing and the one guy being mildly p-whipped, they were super manly.

13
BigIronBigIron 13 points ago +14 / -1

Daniel Craig, gay bar afficianado.

0
_deleted_ 0 points ago +1 / -1

He's not Bond anymore afaik

9
2016TrumpMAGA 9 points ago +10 / -1

What I liked about Craig as bond, is that he was the most Connery-like, and the second closest to the depiction in the books - A cold blooded killer.

7
independentbystander 7 points ago +7 / -0

Also in the books: Bond is very nondescript, not a memorable looking person at all. His hair color could be described different ways, he's average height and build.

This is how Bond can get away with things in public and not be recognized, and also how he can pose as a janitor, cook, or high-society party guest all in the same evening- just by procuring the appropriate apparel for each purpose of a mission.

This is why Idris Elba is a very poor choice as Bond, no matter how desperately paid shills/commenters insist. It's not because he's black. It's because he looks like a tattoo-covered gangsta thug, no matter what wardrobe choice. Even among other guys who also look like tattoo-covered gangsta thugs, he would stand out- and would be easily recognizable in a line-up. He's got tattoos on his hands: a cry for attention, not an attempt to avoid being recognized.

The same could be said for the Angry Black Woman from the most-recent Bond movie, she would have to leave no witnesses anywhere because she would easily be described afterward by eyewitnesses. She is an equally poor choice as Idris Elba, not because she is black- but because she would not be able to commit Bond-level adventures without being remembered by eyewitnesses.

3
Whitespace 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also because they're black. I mean what, hollywood is recasting characters as black because they care so deeply about blacks?

They're straight out of Martha's Vinyard.

2
RolandDelacroix 2 points ago +3 / -1

Ironically, I felt Dalton was closest to the book, and everyone else hated him.

2
Meddlesom 2 points ago +3 / -1

Dalton was great. The Living Daylights was fantastic. Licence To Kill wasn't as good because taking on drug cartels isn't the typical James Bond theme. He had the really dry wit, which I liked, but that was right after so many fuckin years of slapstick Roger Moore crap, and that's what people had grown to expect from Bond movies.

Lazenby was great in On Her Majesty's Secret Service too. I always thought he was a really good book version of Bond.

Sean Connery was always awesome, just ignore the fake James Bond movie he was in.

0
_deleted_ 0 points ago +1 / -1

Dalton was the most emotional Bond, WTF are you talking about? He literally had a crying scene. Did Bond cry in the books? Which one?

1
AuPhalanx 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not at all how Bond was written in the books.

8
ArtLife 8 points ago +8 / -0

I never liked him as Bond. I thought he was weak, and quite frankly looked like a Soviet spy. Then when there was all the nonsense about his character getting broken up over a woman I knew they had totally betrayed the character. Bond was a good old fashioned rake (modern term would be womanizer) and a rogue (modern term is someone who disregards the rules) and that's part of why he was the best at what he did. He was never going to be emotionally attached to anyone.

2
TheImpossible1 2 points ago +3 / -1

He was never going to be emotionally attached to anyone.

Didn't he get married in On Her Majesty's Secret Service?

2
Pappy_Gunn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, but luckily she got shot.

2
Meddlesom 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, and then Blofeld shoots her in the head on their wedding day. It's basically the event that hardened him towards women and attachment.

1
ArtLife 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have no idea.

2
RolandDelacroix 2 points ago +2 / -0

The original novel character was like that because of the relationship depicted on Casino Royale. That's when he started just using women, partially as revenge.

1
ArtLife 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'll readily admit I did not read the books. But often movie characters have little resemblance to the book.

8
ParticleCannon 8 points ago +8 / -0

men are evolving

  1. You'll never be a real woman

  2. Bond is masculine escapist fiction/fantasy, not socio-masturbatory bullshit

  3. Hollywood is rapidly evolving to an evolutionary dead-end, and box office numbers will tell you all you need to know about the rest of "men"

7
Opticsplanet 7 points ago +7 / -0

If they had him mirror the way the rest of society is going, they would show about an hour and a half of him being a hero for his country and a super eerie 12 minute closing scene where he accidentally hangs himself in the bathroom while jerking off. Then the movie just kinda ends. No credits just dude hanging there. Lets see the Rotten Tomatoes on that one!

2
Meddlesom 2 points ago +2 / -0

Feet swinging back and forth, shit running down his leg, plopping on the floor.

1
jctbg20 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cry cry again

2
Soundwave 2 points ago +2 / -0

Isn’t that a Seinfeld reference? I personally liked “Chunnel” and “Rochelle Rochelle - a young girl’s strange, erotic journey from Milan to Minsk.”

7
publius1788 7 points ago +7 / -0

Sean Connery's really is the best. Just focused on Killing NWO stooges, drinking vodka, and getting international punani.

6
canada_is_communist 6 points ago +6 / -0

Trying?

6
Pickles76 6 points ago +6 / -0

Sometimes I wish the real men of the world would just not show up to work for like 3 days, then maybe they would finally get it. But probably not. Not until a crisis is at their own door, like Martha’s Vineyard.

6
danneskjold 6 points ago +6 / -0

What men are evolving?

3
BigIronBigIron 3 points ago +3 / -0

Harry Styles, he's evolving into a little girl

4
Donger-Lord2 4 points ago +4 / -0

You mean massive faggot.

3
-f-b-i- 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well now some men don't have penises. They're still men but penisless

5
Nw15062 5 points ago +5 / -0

Domesticating man requires generations of forcing man against his own instincts and judgement.

It’s not feminizing, it is pacification and strict compliance.

No more free will, and wild untamed bravery. Death will not be feared excepted when directed, otherwise fear is the tool and compliance is the result.

1
zooty 1 point ago +1 / -0

And probably sending the best off to die in meaningless wars.

5
B4size25paper 5 points ago +5 / -0

Men aren't evolving. We're the same we 've always been. Sissies aren't men. Neither are soyboys. They're pronouns.

5
totovader 5 points ago +8 / -3

Abandoning reason is not evolving - it's de-evolving.

5
mailinvoter 5 points ago +5 / -0

If men are "evolving" to show their emotional sides then we need to start punching/kicking each other in the balls more to wake these pussies up and make sure we don't turn into pussies.

4
Puppy528 4 points ago +4 / -0

| Just as Men Are Evolving

Playing dress-up and pretending you're somehow a woman now is not "evolving".

0
TheImpossible1 0 points ago +1 / -1

They're evolving into what women want them to be. The perfect, compliant slave ATMs.

The worst fantasies of the WEF pale to the average views of a woman.

2
okboomer59 2 points ago +2 / -0

cool, another way to divide us

no wonder they hate families

and what is a "woman"?

4
Wolf_22 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, white masculine characters...

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not true. Black movies and black actors have a long history of doing drag in movies and other wack ass shit to the male characters.

1
Wolf_22 1 point ago +1 / -0

What's an example?

4
Light_HIV_Effect 4 points ago +5 / -1

While I enjoyed Casino Royale, I never thought Daniel Craig was right for bond.

5
CisSiberianOrchestra [S] 5 points ago +6 / -1

As the Critical Drinker put it: Daniel's Craig is the only Bond who seems like he completely hates his job. All of the other Bonds seemed like they enjoyed being a secret agent.

0
_deleted_ 0 points ago +1 / -1

He had the advantage of being in the best produced, least cheesey, most gritty Bond films. Not the best Bond, but the first three were some of the best Bond films IMO.

1
Light_HIV_Effect 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think Lazenby was miles better despite being in just one movie

4
1776ThereIsaidIt 4 points ago +7 / -3

Roger Moore was the first queer James Bond.

4
JBlaze056 4 points ago +4 / -0

Men are not evolving or devolving. This is drivel. It is manipulation. It is agenda setting BS.

4
MaverickRobot 4 points ago +4 / -0

You only live twice literally starts with Bond’s wife getting murdered, and he sulks/emotes, and gets revenge.

4
Patriot210 4 points ago +4 / -0

They literally blew him up with a missile at the end of the movie and everyone cried he was dead and set it up for a black lesbian to be the new bond.

4
Groundpounder 4 points ago +4 / -0

“I prefer my pronouns shaken, not stirred” - Jamey Bond, 2023

1
okboomer59 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jami, Jami Bong

me rub you wrong time

CCP twippo agent

twust me

4
SenorTrumper 4 points ago +4 / -0

So who is replacing Craig?

7
CisSiberianOrchestra [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

They haven't chosen yet. They don't want somebody who is too old, because they're looking for somebody who can commit to playing the character for at least 10 years.

Personally, I think Henry Cavill would make a great Bond. But him getting cast would depend on the studio being run by people who make sane decisions.

3
daty_dato 3 points ago +3 / -0

Henry has the acting range of a carrot..

2
fapping123 2 points ago +2 / -0

Henry is based though.

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +1 / -0

lmao

1
Meddlesom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, he sucks. He already ruined Superman.

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +1 / -0

I like Cavill so as good as it would pay I'd hope he'd do something else than get tied up in Woke Bond.

0
_deleted_ 0 points ago +1 / -1

It'll be a black actor.

6
Pepe1776_ 6 points ago +6 / -0

A black lesbian tranny

3
BigIronBigIron 3 points ago +3 / -0

Megan Markle

1
dc53dc53 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lizzo

1
SenorTrumper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lizzo Rizzo?

I doubt it.

3
bubadmt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Will Bond start crying because Q gives him his drink stirred instead of shaken?

3
NimbleNavigator20202 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sounds Like Shit No Thanks

3
Grindelwald 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe the little mermaid could be a Bond Girl.

2
Meddlesom 2 points ago +2 / -0

Halle Barry was already the worst Bond Girl.

3
DrJosephWarren 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lol future headline: BOND BOMBS

2
phatey 2 points ago +2 / -0

It will be nice when people have to make honest money and not suck globohomo dick to get paid.

2
UK_Pede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Didn’t watch the last one and won’t watch any more. Let’s watch it burn together.

2
webthing 2 points ago +2 / -0

Producers will explore bonds feminine side. 👡💋🎀

2
Cmon 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is a weak sticky post. What mod stickied this bullshit?

2
MAGArella 2 points ago +2 / -0

They only make sense now as period pieces, set in the 50s and 60s.

Fleming's sensibilities made the character, not the woman whose family developed broccoli 🥦

2
FrankWisner 2 points ago +2 / -0

In their defense, MI6 are total faggots. Literally every one of them.

2
PumpingIron-pat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Next thing u know John Wick and the Punisher will have "feelings"

2
Nobeanchilicostsmore 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hollywood has to fag up everything

2
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 2 points ago +2 / -0

The dude fucked Octopussy so he could kill her boss, I don't want James Bond to have a "sensitive side".

2
realPhantomFuck 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's almost like they're trying to lose money

Maverick did phenomenal because the audience wants a rah, rah American experience

2
daty_dato 2 points ago +2 / -0

We watched the original right before Maverick. The original was far better. We thought it was meh for the most part.

2
zooty 2 points ago +2 / -0

These days, 5/10 is 8/10.

1
realPhantomFuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmmm, you're in the minority then

2
Lol_Garrus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Laughs in Sean Connery

2
sustainable_saltmine 2 points ago +2 / -0

Being a "sensitive" feminine little bitch is not "evolving"