2595
Comments (136)
sorted by:
197
jeffj95 197 points ago +198 / -1

GOA>NRA

31
MarxhatedJews 31 points ago +32 / -1

This should be the highest upvoted comment.

22
Agent26660 22 points ago +22 / -0

It is now.

7
DickTick 7 points ago +7 / -0

Ask and you shall receive

18
Titanium7 18 points ago +18 / -0

to the top!

15
IncredibleMrE1 15 points ago +16 / -1

Alwayshasbeen.jpg

10
Mavdick96 10 points ago +10 / -0

FPC too.

0
4
Lasernuts 4 points ago +4 / -0

FPC is still really good, they are technically not wrong in that tweet as pedos have to brought to justice via the laws and requirements of the constitution. Until proven guilty by judgement of their piers or by own admission - they are protected by the constitution.

They don’t support pedos, it’s an exceptionally poorly worded tweet.

2
ItsOkayToBeWight 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't get this either. Pedophilia is a very easy accusation to throw around. And for the FBI or CIA, very easy to manufacture evidence and lock someone away. Pedophiles are disgusting, but if ANY crime makes one exempt from due process, the deep state will use that crime to disappear dissidents.

3
Mavdick96 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ooooof.

8
TommyLasordasBallBag 8 points ago +8 / -0

USCCA for those of us who like to go incognito. But yeah, GOA is good too...

77
Queens_Q_Branch 77 points ago +77 / -0

The NRA is the biggest bunch of fudd faggots. They don't care about gun rights they care about money.

14
Stolen 14 points ago +14 / -0

Reminds me of the Rona Romney McDaniel Republican Party. Steal the money from the steal.

3
MarxhatedJews 3 points ago +5 / -2

Then what is the ILA doing? I'm not defending the tailored suits, trips, offices, expenditures, pomp - any of the BS. But the ILA isn't inactive. Do you have any thought on their recent court victories?

4
wiombims 4 points ago +5 / -1

I do. It's called NO MONEY, BITCH. You know it, I know it, the NRA knows it. NRA-ILA is a separate organization that happens to share HALF of the same name. Idk why the NRA-ILA ever allowed that kind of GRIFTING to go on. Says a bit about them too (maybe that they're really efficient and operate best on a low budget coming from hardcore fans that know they have to donate to NRA-ILA and NOT NRA). I had a little disagreement with a pede on here that got so mad I was an "anti-gun shill" that he went and donated 20$ to the nra (so he said). It kind of proved my point so I made up with the pede and wished him a good life because stupidity like that isn't curable overnight.

0
MarxhatedJews 0 points ago +4 / -4

Lots of words.

What was your complaint again? Looks just like a compliment.

4
wiombims 4 points ago +4 / -0

tl;dr no complaint. I agree with both of you. 🤣

0
Bullet3250 0 points ago +2 / -2

You really need to read up on the NRA and stop buying the MSM/DNC talking points.

They spend Millions each year suing Federal State and Local districts to protect your gun rights...

dig around and find out - https://www.nraila.org/

-1
Spawnlingman -1 points ago +1 / -2

Why can't they care about both. Without gun rights they stop making money.

16
ManlyFirmness 16 points ago +16 / -0

Without the ever present threat to liberty they stop making money also

5
wiombims 5 points ago +7 / -2

Because the NRA really does care fuckall about you and treats you like the idiots who can't tell the difference between nra and nra-ila that you are. They're responsible for some of the biggest gungrabs ever and don't start with the "we needed to" thing boomers because after EVERY time they did that, they promised they'd turn a new leaf. I said okay that was history the first time, shame on them. I said okay, you fucked me the second time shame on me. You know what they say about the third time.

2
DonuteaterReturns 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because if you had the rights you should have, what purpose does the NRA serve? They're not going to put themselves out of business.

50
South_Florida_Guy 50 points ago +50 / -0

The NRA is not a friend of 2A

20
LightBringerFlex [S] 20 points ago +20 / -0

They were infiltrated long ago.

17
saltyviewer123 17 points ago +17 / -0

When you change the letters around it spells FBI

16
WassermanSchultz 16 points ago +16 / -0

Rearrange those letters and you get FAG.

17
IncredibleMrE1 17 points ago +18 / -1

I tried that, but got Bill Mitchell.

I aced spelling.

5
CaptainCheekClapper 5 points ago +5 / -0

🤣🤣🤣🤣💀

5
Standingoak 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's a friend of the ROOT of ALL EVIL. As are most people and organizations.

“Few men have virtue to withstand the highest bidder." — George Washington

1
woke_redneck 1 point ago +1 / -0

the higest bid doesnt need to be high to purchase poor schmucks

33
sorryforyourfeelingz 33 points ago +35 / -2

NRA is gay

13
saltyviewer123 13 points ago +13 / -0

and kind of Fake too.

11
IncredibleMrE1 11 points ago +12 / -1

Completely both.

17
tillarytinton 17 points ago +18 / -1

Not so. Even back to the founders they recognized that rights were forfeit based on criminal acts. The same with any other liberty like life or freedom of movement. For example if you commit murder, you forfeit your right to life. If you rob, you forfeit your freedom of movement and are imprisoned and forfeit your right to property in the items you stole. So on and so forth. They also recognized that lunatics had rights restricted.

I get the sentiment though, especially since we are living in a post rule of law country.

12
Maggot 12 points ago +12 / -0

Also a stolen weapon is not a legitimately owned gun.

3
ceremony_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

How does this jive with the notion of God-given rights from the Creator?

So, what God gives, we can take away?

11
tillarytinton 11 points ago +12 / -1

What God gives, some evil motherfucker can take away for sure. Whether that's life, liberty, or property. While God may punish in the hereafter, the righteous are responsible for maintaining their rights in the present.

If someone aggresses against you, you have a right of self defense to deprive that person of their rights. Up to and including their right to life. To a lesser extent that might include imprisoning them and taking their means (weapons) of aggression away from them. The idea generally is that sure you are born with natural rights, but on your own you are subject to the domination of more powerful forces that will deprive you of those rights. So, you and others band together to better protect those rights. But in doing so open themselves up to tyranny from the group. The idea of the republic envisioned by the founders was to maximize the liberties while minimizing the danger of tyranny. Keep the members of the group safe from both external and internal threats to their liberty. Federalist No. 51 goes into this pretty well.

2
NotMyPresident2021 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Anti-Federalists were right.

-1
wiombims -1 points ago +3 / -4

Don't care. That's what every judge says and they're full of shit. Rights are absolute. If you want to make it the death penalty for every crime, fine. Let's have at it and bring your best. That logic paves the way for EVERY abuse of power and there's no end to the abuses. They keep escalating the abuse every year. Well akshually you don't _____. No, fuck that, fuck you, and the horse you rode in on.

4
tillarytinton 4 points ago +5 / -1

Madison, Jefferson, Adams, and the others are full of shit. Got it.

3
wiombims 3 points ago +5 / -2

Nobody's perfect. You think they wrote the bill of rights imagining their little exceptions would be used to HAVE NO RIGHTS? Because you don't have free speech. You don't have the 2a as written. You don't have privacy, you're not secure in your effects. Name a fucking right in the bor that is as untouched as the driven snow. Thanks for playing. That's right, every amendment in the BOR has been perverted under your fucked up "exception" that somehow became THE NORM.

edit: for the slow in the back, they wrote shall not quarter not shove a boot up your ass under exigent circumstances because we gotta build a highway. They wrote the 2A with the idea that your dumb ass would eventually get a warship and sail the high seas a baller not a pleb that begs the government " can I pweeez have a 22 via mail pweeez sir I'll be so good I'll suck your dick again for only 60% of my income even though we're not really at war".

10
tillarytinton 10 points ago +11 / -1

“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” - John Adams

They knew what they were doing. We are no longer that moral and religious people. We are no longer within the rule of law. That's why I said I agree with sentiment. However, even in the Founders time, they would have no problem with disarming a murderer or robber. Don't give me shit for wanting to be clear on the facts. Let the left be the emotional hyperbolic doofuses.

5
BailoutsAreSocialism 5 points ago +5 / -0

See the downvotes ? Always remember ... MOST PEOPLE ARE DUMB LITTLE SHEEP !

9
garandthumb69 9 points ago +9 / -0

❤ No gun is illegal ❤

6
D__1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Gun rights are human rights

6
Freedomnc1776 6 points ago +10 / -4

No...not all gun owners are legal friend.

10
LightBringerFlex [S] 10 points ago +12 / -2

2nd Amendment. Right to Bear Arms. Shall not be infringed.

4
BeefyBelisarius 4 points ago +4 / -0

You're conflating legality with morality. It's always morally right to be armed, but not always legally right, because many laws were written by retarded commie fags.

3
ThirteenPercenter 3 points ago +5 / -2

Perhaps you should start a fundraiser to equip all people locked up in jail and prison with guns then

2
LightBringerFlex [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

Locking people up in cages is against human rights too. They can be humanely housed in a quarantined city protected by guards. Some countries do this and there’s no crime even though they have big cooking knives.

2
NotMyPresident2021 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which countries do this?

-5
wiombims -5 points ago +2 / -7

I have no problem with that. You got a problem with that? Or you like a little bit of dick in your ass when you go to the big pound? Yeah, you seem like the kind of jail queer that would like to take people's guns away.

6
ThirteenPercenter 6 points ago +7 / -1

WTF is wrong with you

2
TheMAGAnificent 2 points ago +4 / -2

Yeah you're right. Antifa should be able to buy fully automatic truck-mountable 50 cals through Amazon prime delivery before a trump rally. Zero restrictions, got it.

2
Mountaineer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Antifa

No no no. The rights belong to the people, not subhuman communist scum.

2
NotMyPresident2021 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've seen this one before. Where in history did a group of people get classified as subhuman?

0
LightBringerFlex [S] 0 points ago +4 / -4

That’s how it is in many countries. People carry rocket launchers to the deli. Everyone looks out for everyone.

3
DonuteaterReturns 3 points ago +4 / -1

And those countries are shitholes.

1
Mtnlion667 1 point ago +1 / -0

Depends on which you value- state laws, or the constitution.

But I get your point- if you are pointing out how the majority of gun crimes are committed by people that got their guns w out following local laws.

5
BarronVonSaltzburg26 5 points ago +5 / -0

More and more every day. My 78 year old neighbor lady just told me she bought her first fire arm and asked me to give her lessons. Happily.

4
Mtnlion667 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hell yeah!

4
Snoman 4 points ago +5 / -1

Those are the legal guns, let’s call it 450 Mill counting all of them.

4
Ryanaissance 4 points ago +4 / -0

Any arm, any speech, any belief. No law can place restrictions.

3
TraitorJoes 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm a "legal fool" ? That's a relief 🤠

3
Ullyr_Atreides 3 points ago +3 / -0

The NRA is asshoe though. But they're right.

2
The88888888 2 points ago +2 / -0

Use to CCW in SD/LA without a "permit". God given rights. Fuck your feelings! We the people!

2
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 2 points ago +2 / -0

They know we're the problem. That's why they are acting accordingly.

2
WakeMeUpTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actually, legal gun owners are the problem.

How is it that Zhou BaiDeng is pResident?

2
TakenusernameA 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only illegal gun is one smuggled by the CIA and FBI to criminals and mass shooters.

1
MarxhatedJews 1 point ago +2 / -1

And Hunter's ones and that communist Karen Bass, too

2
TheRougarou 2 points ago +2 / -0

NRA is asshoe

2
ProudConservativeNY 2 points ago +2 / -0

415 million guns that they know of 😉

2
cd3dog 2 points ago +2 / -0

Righteous!!

2
Data 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd like to see the study they're referring to. Should be good ammo for fighting gun control.

2
trump4045 2 points ago +2 / -0

NRA, GOP,...

2
brotatofarmer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ah. The pro gun control NRA.

Fuck off.

2
frogface 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think they counted mine, the number would be higher.

2
Gonzotron5000 2 points ago +2 / -0

technically its illegal for a felon to own a gun. But the constitutionality is another matter.

3
LightBringerFlex [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

No victim. No crime. Under common law.

1
Teufel_Hunden71 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rookie numbers

1
madeaprofilejustforu 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except for illegals… right?

4
LightBringerFlex [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Even illegals. If illegals wanted to kill someone, they would regardless of the law. Murder is illegal under Natural Law.

2
madeaprofilejustforu 2 points ago +2 / -0

Word up.

1
knnbccb 1 point ago +1 / -0

Owning firearms is your only insurance against tyranny.

Every country which does not legally allow ownership of firearms, either an outright ban or allowed with restrictions and as a 'privilege', is a tyranny, even as a cleverly disguised 'democratic country'.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +4 / -3

You can forfeit your natural human rights by committing crimes. I don't want felons having guns.

3
LightBringerFlex [S] 3 points ago +4 / -1

I disagree because they can make everything a crime and use that as an excuse to take guns.

2
wiombims 2 points ago +3 / -1

Box of shells says if we dig deep enough, we can pin a felony on you.

3
XxxRDTPRNxxX 3 points ago +3 / -0

Worst I ever did was personal use level possession of marijuana, which has been legal in my state for 8+ years.

I'm sure I could compromise and say not all felonies should be treated the same as far as gun rights go, but yeah for the most part, I stand by what I said. I don't want felons having guns.

1
wiombims 1 point ago +2 / -1

How about voting rights? Free speech? Any other rights you'd like to take away once they're released?

2
XxxRDTPRNxxX 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, yes actually.

Keep in mind that when you commit a crime you lose the right to walk down a hallway without an agent of the state being able to check your asshole for contraband.

So just because you may have served enough time to regain your right to walk down the street, doesn't necessarily mean you've regained the right to get a gun.

I don't see any reason why a punishment needs to stop at prison, considering out of prison punishments (like probation and parole) have always been a thing.

But yeah... Taking away their voting rights sounds like a good idea to me. Why the fuck do we want criminals voting?!

1
wiombims 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just put a bullet in their head and get it over with.

2
XxxRDTPRNxxX 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's a compromise I'll take, for the most part.

But in lieu of that, felons don't deserve the same rights as regular people.

1
NotMyPresident2021 1 point ago +1 / -0

If a person is too dangerous to have a gun, then they don't belong on the street.

1
Fr330rD13 1 point ago +1 / -0

Inherent right of self defense...I actually think that number is low...I did the research once back in 2014 and in the U.S. it was something like 2.5 guns for every man woman and child in the U.S. In circulation.

Obviously, most of those guns were possessed by people who owned multiple firearms and close to 80 percent were white males and mostly conservative types. It would explain why they are so targeted.

1
thegeeseisleese 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ahem,

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
BiglyRedly 1 point ago +1 / -0

After the gov makes everyone prohibited then will they drop that absurd saying

1
Donaldsweiner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck the NRA

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
cherbui 1 point ago +1 / -0

SLAVES HAVE NO RIGHTS to be Armed ... YAH GOT THAT demoRats !

1
remindmelater 1 point ago +1 / -0

Democrats are the problem......

1
Calumet57 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who the fuck are the "folks" the NRA is speaking to here? I doubt the number 415M. I'll not say whether I think it is high or low. In fact, no one should know the number.

1
DrHavick 1 point ago +1 / -0

God damn right! That means felons to!

1
laylahege 1 point ago +1 / -0

How do they get these numbers... I'm not about to tell some stranger taking a survey how many guns I have.

1
MAGAGOAT 1 point ago +1 / -0

I like the message just not the name.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
farangbak 1 point ago +1 / -0

Welp, I've got 11 of them.

1
Fusion360 1 point ago +1 / -0

We have the worlds largest civilian milita. China only has four million total.

No country would dare invade America. Additionally, no one would think of disarming us, even though they try.

1
LightBringerFlex [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Be careful of 5G towers. I hear they can kill certain people. I think vaccinated people. That’s the only way to disarm certain people.

1
Fusion360 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its funny they made a movie about cell phones turning people into zomblies. I think movies depict truth far too often.

1
labiator 1 point ago +1 / -0

TIL criminals with guns invading my home are legal - you take the koolade?

1
Nomad899 1 point ago +1 / -0

I will suggest the various gang bangers shooting up chiraq nyc and oaktown are not legal

2
LightBringerFlex [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are legal but killing people is illegal.

1
Nomad899 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not if they stole it from gerome down the street

1
ThirteenPercenter 1 point ago +3 / -2

LOL wut?

I suppose you think that joggers currently in prison should be able to have guns

This forum is embarrassing sometimes

1
wiombims 1 point ago +1 / -0

You put them in prison, they come out, and you still want to keep their guns? Okay there mister justice. Talk about embarrassing.

1
ThirteenPercenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Learn how to read. I was talking about when they are in prison.

1
wiombims 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't want any of them raped in prison and I see no reason for them not to have a gun when they went in for financial crimes. I'm not so sure I want them not to have a gun in supermax. You know how easy it is to kill a man when you're two feet away from him? The idea is to protect the general population from them. It's not to dose them on thorazine and let them out 4 years later. They want to kill each other in the pen, have at it. They already smuggle every drug known to man in there and bribe half the guards. They'll either learn how to civilize or they'll weed each other out until only the strongest stays in prison for life. Win win for everybody.

1
LightBringerFlex [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Finland houses prisoners humanely in quarantined cities with guards. No crime in those cities because they are living humanely.

1
MustafaJones 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well maybe the NRA should actually do something to protect the rights of all those gun owners instead of taking their money and just letting tyrannical politicians keep implementing un-constitutional gun laws.

1
LightBringerFlex [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Commies infiltrated it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Goatboy66 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe soon, they will find out for themselves.

1
DocOneToo 1 point ago +1 / -0

The NRA and specifically Wayne LaPierre can go fuck themselves. Also, that number is way too low in practice, so that’s cool. They also forgot to mention the TRILLION round of privately owned ammo.