I like AJ and don't think you are a bad person for not liking him. In fact I appreciate it. That is what freedom of speech is all about. Unrestrained public discourse
Satanists should try to push their agenda more....it's bringing more people to Jesus Christ. Keep it up leftists, you are bringing more people closer to God with your posts.
I don't want pedophiles to be able to speak. Not sorry about it either. Fuck free speech if it means I have to let people push raping kids on a platform that - sadly - has a lot of unsupervised minors on it. Fuck free speech if it means I have to let groomers groom on any platform or human traffickers grab more kids.
Beyond that, I could not care less what others say.
Screaming asshole trying to raise your bloodpressure and piss you off, combined with someone whose default method of dealing with nuance is screaming at people until they shut up. I dont need to watch the TV to do that, I am already too much like that myself.
If you were one of the only people who knew the truth, and you had proof, and you were trying to help and inform everyone that they're being harmed, and they ignore you, it'd be pretty frustrating, wouldn't it? Now do that for 25 years.
Cut the man some slack. He's a literal hero, and has the patience of a saint.
there are times when he is extremely cogent and really thought provoking. i love when he details all the ways we have been screwed and he cites specific examples. the serious alex jones is 100x better than wild and crazy jones.
when you say ‘parody of the right’ i know what you mean…loud, proud, brash and portly.
his sunday shows are usually better than his daily ones… he seems calmer and more put together. his documentaries demonstrate how good he can be when he slows down and constructs his arguments.
You ever actually listen to one of his interviews or just reddit highlights. I honestly think the dude is genuine and completely distraught as our nation crumbles while he points out obvious happenings the masses absolutely deny blindly.
He understands what we are losing and how hard his ancestors fought. Nothing worse than going into battle with nothing but cowards beside you. To say you don't like someone that puts out alternative information in a controlled society is an intellectual crime. As someone who makes genuises or genii beg for the truth on the regular I understand how dangerous this is. To understand truth you must have all angles. Anyone who denies you this information because of their feelings is a traitor.
People on this site need to stop letting the perfect be the enemy of the good. It's one of the reasons I've been liking this place less and less over the last few years: the non-stop purity testing.
"Oh, this person only agrees with me 90% of the time instead of 100% of the time? THEY'RE A DEEP STATE CONTROLLED OPPOSSITION SHILL!"
Good point, purity spirals lead to negative outcomes.
However, we absolutely must be critical, especially of those that consider themselves our peers.
Ideally, we give constructive criticism. “I support your basic tenet but here is where you made a specific error”. And then provide feedback that the other person can actually utilize as a basis for self improvement.
This kind of critique makes us stronger. It should always be welcomed and appreciated.
But like you mentioned, blanket dismissals are counterproductive. If all you have to contribute is base negativity, keep it to yourself. That type of feedback is not valuable. Learn how to give constructive criticism instead.
This is true. The antichrist will be charismatic and have such a powerful ability to persuade, on a scale of 1-10 he will be a 100, literally supernatural oration powers.
He agreed with every wef policy publicly stated. I might be off by one or two, but he's a son of a satanist who was always in the right place at the right time to get super wealthy.
I think this has more to do with it than anything. He did spend money to free Twitter but he also knows he has to proceed with some people staying banned
Stefan Molyneux always seemed a bit too bland for me. It was clever the way they banned him on the same day as David Duke, as a way of lumping them together as extreme white supremacists.
I read an interview with Stefan Molyneux after his deplatforming. He lost 95% of his audience and 95% of his revenue. Apparently his audience was too lazy to type in a new url so they could keep following him. Since he's now Internet notorious, he can't get a regular job, but he can no longer earn a living from publishing on the Internet.
That's why the left is going to keep deplatforming people. It works. Most of the people who were kicked off big tech went from being high-profile to nearly invisible.
YouTube is where the big bucks are to be had undoubtedly and SM surely took a financial hit after his deplatforming.
But at the end of the day, these nebulous ad supported services are a flash in the pan at best. You may ride a wave of popularity, but rarely is that a real means of stable income in the long run.
Intellectuals who publicly lecture do provide value, and should be compensated for their contributions. But the fame and stardom some of these people are chasing is mostly a mirage. SM may have been pulling seven figures, but that was never sustainable given his actual output.
There is true freedom in abandoning big tech and instead relying on grass roots engagement on alt platforms. With the popularity of big tech endorsement comes a heavy ethical burden. Authenticity is often the first casualty. Create new content for the sake of campaign deadlines. It ends up dull and uninteresting. This same fate has afflicted many formerly great creators.
Authentically engaged audiences care not for daily posts or updates. They savor quality content at the expense of quantity. They stick around because they feel idealistically aligned with the creator.
SM will be fine. As long as he continues to push boundaries and explore controversial topics, his core audience will follow.
Relying on big tech to earn a living seems like a bad business model.
Remember when everyone shut down their personal websites and set up a Facebook page? Initially it was great, lots of folowers! But then Facebook changed the rules and the only way you could reach your followers is via paid advertising. Otherwise, your posts were deranked and buried. That's what happens when you move from a website you control to someone else's platform. You always should be building your own brand, not someone else's.
That's the only way to get back to where everyone has their own website. Having a presence on FaceBook/Twitter/etc. is just playing a game where someone else makes the rules and can cut you off at any time.
Also, Stefan Molyneux is self-censoring so he doesn't get kicked off his new platforms.
I stopped watching Molyneux videos because he will make a 2 hour video when the same idea could be explained in 5 minutes. I also already understood most of the points he was trying to make, so it wasn't really new information for me.
This wasn't possible in the early days of the Internet, because everyone had their own website.
For the normies, if it isn't on Google/Youtube/Twitter/Facebook/Reddit, then it doesn't exists. People need to get back in the habit of having their own website and going directly to someone's website, rather than following them on YouTube/etc.
Now everybodys heard
About the bird, the bird the bird the
Bird is the word
A papa-oom-mow-mow
A papa-oom-mow-mow
A papa-oom-mow-mow
A papa-oom-mow-mow
Funniest sound I ever heard
(A papa-oom-mow-mow)
(A papa-oom-mow-mow)
But I can't understand
A single word
(A papa-oom-mow-mow)
(A papa-oom-mow-mow)
It means Musk is giving the impression that he's liberating Twitter, but he is still operating within the stringent limitations of a weakened society with a corrupt government overseeing it all.
For Twitter to have any chance of actually having free speech and for people to trust the site, all of those banned (for non illegal activities) need to be reinstated. That includes, Alex Jones, Donald Trump, Milo Yiannopoulos and anyone else, whether they are left, right, centre or whatever political leaning they have. Start the site off fresh, everyone gets a clean slate.
Yes. Not as good as no cage. Still better than the smaller cage.
That said, the ‘cage’ on this site is smaller than even pre-Musk Twitter, so I suppose the optimal size of ‘cage’ depends on what role the platform in question is trying to fulfill.
I hate what they are doing to him. I want to beat them up; but I am an old woman. So I will wait to see what the courts can do with a ground swell of the common people. Its all we have left and I am all out of bubble gum.
Heh, you know, Musk is trying to do something that is in my opinion revolutionary. He had to buy a major media arm of the democrat party to influence it to be more in tune with our own constitution. That is pretty sad in itself, a foreign born individual had to acquire an almost unstoppable juggernaut of leftist ideals in order to change it to a more open discussion in the realm of politics. Everything in this country is now political and Musk is doing us a huge favor and I believe he intended to. This guy is not dumb by any stretch and while some of us might be on the extreme end (myself included, America before all except God), he is barely scratching the surface of just how politically corrupt this country is. He is getting there though, but everyone should remember, this is a business and you gotta appease the biggest crowd. I think Musk is a net positive, a high net positive.
Universal free speech or censorship. Black or white, light or dark, true or false, RIGHT OR WRONG. There are absolutes. Elon is a trans-humanist POS looking out for HIMSELF.
I am not an Alex Jones fan. Outside of "Bill Clinton is a Rapist" I like pretty much nothing else he has done.
Still - he must be reinstated on Twitter.
I like AJ and don't think you are a bad person for not liking him. In fact I appreciate it. That is what freedom of speech is all about. Unrestrained public discourse
SANDY HOOK WAS FAKE AND GAY
And that’s ok to say
That'll be one BILLION dollars.
Right. This is the kind of thing you can say on a platform that makes zero money. It's fun. It's not business. Merely fun.
Exactly what Musk would say!
SHOULD say
The bird is not free, it's just in a bigger cage.
I think we found his account.
SUPER MALE VITALITY
GAY FROGS WITH BONERZ!
What are the odds.....Bruce Jenner went to Sandy Hook High , a couple blocks away ?
Ban for eternity cause we're too insecure to hear a different viewpoint- CNN
Satanists should try to push their agenda more....it's bringing more people to Jesus Christ. Keep it up leftists, you are bringing more people closer to God with your posts.
Clear alternatives make easy choices.
MAGA
Imagine a country without political parties. Candidates would have to run solely on ideas. Leftism would have never existed if we listened.
I don't want pedophiles to be able to speak. Not sorry about it either. Fuck free speech if it means I have to let people push raping kids on a platform that - sadly - has a lot of unsupervised minors on it. Fuck free speech if it means I have to let groomers groom on any platform or human traffickers grab more kids.
Beyond that, I could not care less what others say.
Why don’t you like him? He’s right about 90% of the time while the MSM gets it right about 10% of the time
99.999% of the time.
Well, maybe 99.997%.
I read more of what he says because I dislike his delivery. He sounds annoying to me, just is what it is for some of us.
Screaming asshole trying to raise your bloodpressure and piss you off, combined with someone whose default method of dealing with nuance is screaming at people until they shut up. I dont need to watch the TV to do that, I am already too much like that myself.
The issue isnt the words it is the delivery.
This thread is about Alex Jones not "The Great One" Mark Levine. You can leave thru the door you came in.
Just more proof the people that don't like AJ have never watched him.
He strikes me as an over-the-top parody of the right.
You're only watching the cut together propaganda.
If you were one of the only people who knew the truth, and you had proof, and you were trying to help and inform everyone that they're being harmed, and they ignore you, it'd be pretty frustrating, wouldn't it? Now do that for 25 years.
Cut the man some slack. He's a literal hero, and has the patience of a saint.
there are times when he is extremely cogent and really thought provoking. i love when he details all the ways we have been screwed and he cites specific examples. the serious alex jones is 100x better than wild and crazy jones.
when you say ‘parody of the right’ i know what you mean…loud, proud, brash and portly.
his sunday shows are usually better than his daily ones… he seems calmer and more put together. his documentaries demonstrate how good he can be when he slows down and constructs his arguments.
You ever actually listen to one of his interviews or just reddit highlights. I honestly think the dude is genuine and completely distraught as our nation crumbles while he points out obvious happenings the masses absolutely deny blindly.
He understands what we are losing and how hard his ancestors fought. Nothing worse than going into battle with nothing but cowards beside you. To say you don't like someone that puts out alternative information in a controlled society is an intellectual crime. As someone who makes genuises or genii beg for the truth on the regular I understand how dangerous this is. To understand truth you must have all angles. Anyone who denies you this information because of their feelings is a traitor.
Hmm. So you’ve never read his book “the great reset”? Because if you have and you like nothing in it then that’s a bit alarming lol.
I get this joke.
I have not.
This
Did anyone here really think Twitter would be 100% free speech?
People on this site need to stop letting the perfect be the enemy of the good. It's one of the reasons I've been liking this place less and less over the last few years: the non-stop purity testing.
"Oh, this person only agrees with me 90% of the time instead of 100% of the time? THEY'RE A DEEP STATE CONTROLLED OPPOSSITION SHILL!"
It gets really old.
Good point, purity spirals lead to negative outcomes.
However, we absolutely must be critical, especially of those that consider themselves our peers.
Ideally, we give constructive criticism. “I support your basic tenet but here is where you made a specific error”. And then provide feedback that the other person can actually utilize as a basis for self improvement.
This kind of critique makes us stronger. It should always be welcomed and appreciated.
But like you mentioned, blanket dismissals are counterproductive. If all you have to contribute is base negativity, keep it to yourself. That type of feedback is not valuable. Learn how to give constructive criticism instead.
Oh shut up.
Did I hit too close to home?
Go to 4chan and see free speech, how long would twitter last if it became that?
You want free speech of ideas but everyone (normies) will leave if you don't moderate it to some extent.
There won't be a "next time" either.
No, but him getting rid of some of those nasally tech support scammer-tier employees was still a good thing.
Did anyone read the ToS?
Who could have guessed that a man with gorrillions of dollars is out of touch with reality?
I hear you. But he is not charismatic enough. He doesn't convince anyone of anything they didn't already believe.
This is true. The antichrist will be charismatic and have such a powerful ability to persuade, on a scale of 1-10 he will be a 100, literally supernatural oration powers.
I’ve heard him quite a bit more than average. What has he said and done that makes you say?
Not to mention pro UBI. Universal welfare is universal slavery.
Stole my money. He's a global warming grifting faggot jew loving foreginer. Whats your fucking problem?
He agreed with every wef policy publicly stated. I might be off by one or two, but he's a son of a satanist who was always in the right place at the right time to get super wealthy.
Show the full picture:
https://twitter.com/revelation17_14/status/1593738994227023873/photo/1
Elon is in the Google/apple App store cage.
I think this has more to do with it than anything. He did spend money to free Twitter but he also knows he has to proceed with some people staying banned
Guess who’s holding Elon’s cage ?
Stop noticing
Every time
It's just a pattern. I'm sure it means nothing.
Viva is right. Alex Jones is the litmus test.
a person undergoing their own legal troubles somehow is the problem of some platform they used?
what about the internet service provider?
Jokes on you. Alex is transitioning to being a woman (frog.)
I mean you can say this about Truth Social as well, he’ll even this site
Someone should ask Musk about reinstating Stefan Molyneux.
Far more “dangerous” than AJ. That will never happen.
But even if it did, neither SM nor AJ should ever return. That would be like remarrying a lying, cheating spouse because you miss the abuse.
Stefan Molyneux always seemed a bit too bland for me. It was clever the way they banned him on the same day as David Duke, as a way of lumping them together as extreme white supremacists.
I read an interview with Stefan Molyneux after his deplatforming. He lost 95% of his audience and 95% of his revenue. Apparently his audience was too lazy to type in a new url so they could keep following him. Since he's now Internet notorious, he can't get a regular job, but he can no longer earn a living from publishing on the Internet.
That's why the left is going to keep deplatforming people. It works. Most of the people who were kicked off big tech went from being high-profile to nearly invisible.
YouTube is where the big bucks are to be had undoubtedly and SM surely took a financial hit after his deplatforming.
But at the end of the day, these nebulous ad supported services are a flash in the pan at best. You may ride a wave of popularity, but rarely is that a real means of stable income in the long run.
Intellectuals who publicly lecture do provide value, and should be compensated for their contributions. But the fame and stardom some of these people are chasing is mostly a mirage. SM may have been pulling seven figures, but that was never sustainable given his actual output.
There is true freedom in abandoning big tech and instead relying on grass roots engagement on alt platforms. With the popularity of big tech endorsement comes a heavy ethical burden. Authenticity is often the first casualty. Create new content for the sake of campaign deadlines. It ends up dull and uninteresting. This same fate has afflicted many formerly great creators.
Authentically engaged audiences care not for daily posts or updates. They savor quality content at the expense of quantity. They stick around because they feel idealistically aligned with the creator.
SM will be fine. As long as he continues to push boundaries and explore controversial topics, his core audience will follow.
Relying on big tech to earn a living seems like a bad business model.
Remember when everyone shut down their personal websites and set up a Facebook page? Initially it was great, lots of folowers! But then Facebook changed the rules and the only way you could reach your followers is via paid advertising. Otherwise, your posts were deranked and buried. That's what happens when you move from a website you control to someone else's platform. You always should be building your own brand, not someone else's.
That's the only way to get back to where everyone has their own website. Having a presence on FaceBook/Twitter/etc. is just playing a game where someone else makes the rules and can cut you off at any time.
Also, Stefan Molyneux is self-censoring so he doesn't get kicked off his new platforms.
I stopped watching Molyneux videos because he will make a 2 hour video when the same idea could be explained in 5 minutes. I also already understood most of the points he was trying to make, so it wasn't really new information for me.
That's why the left deplatforms people. It works.
This wasn't possible in the early days of the Internet, because everyone had their own website.
For the normies, if it isn't on Google/Youtube/Twitter/Facebook/Reddit, then it doesn't exists. People need to get back in the habit of having their own website and going directly to someone's website, rather than following them on YouTube/etc.
Freed. But not into Freedom.
Seems accurate.
Same Bird, different cage....
Mockingbird
Now everybodys heard About the bird, the bird the bird the Bird is the word A papa-oom-mow-mow A papa-oom-mow-mow A papa-oom-mow-mow A papa-oom-mow-mow
Funniest sound I ever heard (A papa-oom-mow-mow) (A papa-oom-mow-mow)
But I can't understand A single word (A papa-oom-mow-mow) (A papa-oom-mow-mow)
Terrific!
It means Musk is giving the impression that he's liberating Twitter, but he is still operating within the stringent limitations of a weakened society with a corrupt government overseeing it all.
You're free from Twitter jail, welcome to Elon jail enjoy your stay.
You just left your prison cell,
now you are in the prison yard.
You will leave that one later and be on prison island.
No matter how many areas you leave, you aren't free until you leave the prison.
He hasnt fired the moderation team yet.
He's not actually allowing everyone back on.. AJ, Trump, your mom! .. BOOM! ROASTED!!!
For Twitter to have any chance of actually having free speech and for people to trust the site, all of those banned (for non illegal activities) need to be reinstated. That includes, Alex Jones, Donald Trump, Milo Yiannopoulos and anyone else, whether they are left, right, centre or whatever political leaning they have. Start the site off fresh, everyone gets a clean slate.
Thats how you know who's really siding for freedom, and who are the wolves in sheeps clothing.
Not unbanning Alex Jones speaks volumes.
You're not in the matrix anymore little buddy!
Apt.
And this bird, you cannot change
When does a bird sing?
No AJ, No free speech.
Not inaccurate, but it ain’t nothing that the other cage is much bigger.
Yes. Not as good as no cage. Still better than the smaller cage.
That said, the ‘cage’ on this site is smaller than even pre-Musk Twitter, so I suppose the optimal size of ‘cage’ depends on what role the platform in question is trying to fulfill.
Genius.
I hate what they are doing to him. I want to beat them up; but I am an old woman. So I will wait to see what the courts can do with a ground swell of the common people. Its all we have left and I am all out of bubble gum.
Unless Alex Jones is reinstated it’s just a bigger cage. *I’ll allow it meme “
Bi polar is real, y'all.
Let that sink in, Musk.
Heh, you know, Musk is trying to do something that is in my opinion revolutionary. He had to buy a major media arm of the democrat party to influence it to be more in tune with our own constitution. That is pretty sad in itself, a foreign born individual had to acquire an almost unstoppable juggernaut of leftist ideals in order to change it to a more open discussion in the realm of politics. Everything in this country is now political and Musk is doing us a huge favor and I believe he intended to. This guy is not dumb by any stretch and while some of us might be on the extreme end (myself included, America before all except God), he is barely scratching the surface of just how politically corrupt this country is. He is getting there though, but everyone should remember, this is a business and you gotta appease the biggest crowd. I think Musk is a net positive, a high net positive.
accurate, fuck centrists
So true.
Universal free speech or censorship. Black or white, light or dark, true or false, RIGHT OR WRONG. There are absolutes. Elon is a trans-humanist POS looking out for HIMSELF.
No, it ain’t