2076
Comments (72)
sorted by:
73
IncredibleMrE1 73 points ago +74 / -1

Is the commie pinko faggot "judge" Kenneth Hoyt who held them in contempt being removed from the bench and thrown in prison?

43
Farage_massage 43 points ago +43 / -0

Don’t be silly - the torture is complete - future whistle blowers are warned.

When they control the judicial system, the process is the punishment.

18
hdhdhdhdbdbdbsb 18 points ago +19 / -1

that's the whole point.. the goal in any fascist regime is to threaten whistleblowers and people who oppose the regime. even if they are eventually found not guilty in a trial in the court of law they've still been held without bail they've still been tortured they've still been imprisoned.

same with Trump's crew. even if he's found not guilty they still raided the homes of Trump's associates at 3:00 a.m. with an armed Mafia of FBI agents.. it's to send a warning. and if they can actually get you in prison? even better

I mean Michael Flynn went bankrupt costing him $5 million dollars in legal fees defending himself against the bullshit accusation by Obama's FBIi

this is how dictatorships work. fascist dictator takes power illegally and anybody who opposes him finds themselves targeted..

the only way is to fight back. you can't trust the corrupt legal system. you have to go around and do things outside the legal system

3
mareecopa 3 points ago +3 / -0

can a regular wagie afford to participate in politics?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
magamemer 1 point ago +2 / -1

Thrown into the prison at the bottom of a cliff.

52
DonttrustChina 52 points ago +52 / -0

Any judge who wrongly jails someone for contempt should, as soon as the order is found to be unlawful, be jailed themselves for the same amount of time.

9
MasklessMarvel 9 points ago +11 / -2

This only happened because the AG flipped and is now investigating fraud

-23
MasklessMarvel -23 points ago +2 / -25

They were not unlawfully jailed

They violated a judge's order

22
a_rogue_modron 22 points ago +22 / -0

And then the judges above that judge determined the order was unlawful.

Which means the judge below them should've never issued the order.

0
MasklessMarvel 0 points ago +1 / -1

nope, not unlawful

it was a procedural error in interpreting the law

"But the record does not reveal what sort of emergency justified the District Court's demand for that information before the parties could file an answer ... before the parties could file their initial disclosures, or before discovery could begin let alone conclude in the ordinary course."

15
DonttrustChina 15 points ago +15 / -0

An unlawful order, according to superior judges.

Jailing someone for violating an unlawful order is unlawfully jailing them.

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +2 / -1

no, they said his decision did not adhere to proper procedure

"The record does not reveal what sort of emergency justified the District Court's demand for that information before the parties could file an answer ... before the parties could file their initial disclosures, or before discovery could begin let alone conclude in the ordinary course."

-2
mareecopa -2 points ago +1 / -3

It is not. It allows to pretend there is no confrict (of interests) and maintain an aura of objectivity.

2
FBIAreTraitors 2 points ago +4 / -2

Shut up faggot and get back to diddling underage goats.

2
MakeAmericaGreat9 2 points ago +2 / -0

underage goats

😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣

My sides 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

27
MythArcana 27 points ago +27 / -0

I hate the antichrist.

11
Medtex1 11 points ago +11 / -0

This should be a bumper sticker

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
-2
MasklessMarvel -2 points ago +1 / -3

You should hit judge people before you meet them

16
DannyCanusa 16 points ago +16 / -0

The mission of the left is kind of completed in this one. Now if ya try to use 2000 Mules as a source, Lefty Lib will say "but they went to jail."

The constant harassment of anyone who tries to tell the truth is a bitch. If they can get the truth tellers silenced that's their optimal goal. If that doesn't work, then to discredit them is still a win in their eyes.

13
PKC_MAN 13 points ago +13 / -0

Well if was found that they went in jail unlawfully, it nullifies that argument

12
DannyCanusa 12 points ago +12 / -0

To a common sense person it does. To someone who doesn't think an election was stolen it doesn't. To them it's "they went to jail, your source is junk, end of discussion."

There's no reasoning with these people that they were innocent.

9
freespeechsquid 9 points ago +9 / -0

To someone who doesn't think an election was stolen it doesn't. To them it's "they went to jail, your source is junk, end of discussion."

I don't think it matters. If it wasn't that, they'd just pull something else out of their ass. They will refuse to see reason no matter what.

5
riverdream 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think that what DannyCanusa is saying is very plausible. Seems like everyone we count on for solid info or solid action gets jailed or swatted and then attacked. If I remember right, was not Rudy Guiliani the first one to be swatted as a message to everyone?

2
freespeechsquid 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, you're absolutely right, but I'm saying the discrediting angle doesn't matter because these people won't admit them any credibility regardless.

Maybe it makes a difference for people on the fence.

2
GorillaTactics 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think Roger stone was well before Giuliani

1
riverdream 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I think you are correct. I forgot about Roger Stone!

1
DrVSGGEOTUSPhD 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sadly that's true. Consider what normies say when confronted with incintry Project Veritas videos of corporate commies confessing to being actual anti American commies.

3
Cyer6 3 points ago +3 / -0

They were sent unlawfully. This was not "contempt of court" but contempt of "judge" and it's over a long standing constitutional issue protected under the 1st Amendment.

3
Massive_Reaction 3 points ago +5 / -2

Anyone who falls for that is unsalvageable.

6
talltellmanson 6 points ago +6 / -0

Which is a good 30% of the country unfortunately

They just blindly follow their propaganda masters

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +2 / -1

When do we stop caring about what they say?

Fuck 'em

8
MehNahMehNah 8 points ago +8 / -0

Counter lawsuits when?

6
WinterSoldier82 6 points ago +6 / -0

Federal Government Agency needs to be eliminated.

6
AwareNonCompliant 6 points ago +6 / -0

They locked them up during the critical time they were needed to document the big steal. There’s no reason to push it at this point.

4
My2Cents 4 points ago +4 / -0

Leftists' "lawfare" sucks

4
ChynahIzAzzhole 4 points ago +4 / -0

When will he be removed from malfeasance?

3
hillaryforprison 3 points ago +3 / -0

Political persecution. Will the evil judge go to prison for this?!

3
elvisbird 3 points ago +3 / -0

The process is the punishment for many, unfortunately.

3
Tookens 3 points ago +3 / -0

So, when does the judge that put them in jail report for his stay in jail?

2
Trumpdidit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Until judges who abuse their positions are held in contempt themselves for making these political decisions, our judiciary system will continue to decay.

2
mass55th 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now sue the bastards!!

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
DITTOPatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Judge Kenneth Hoyt is who the republicans should be impeaching. Tyranny needs to have consequences.

2
McRigger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol as if anyone who actually needs to watch it will watch it. This kind of stuff is great if you’re one of us but it does nothing in reality because the left already has their minds made up long before they’ll ever see it, which they won’t. It’s the movie version of an echo chamber.

1
MAGAguitar 1 point ago +1 / -0

The true contempt is that which the elite have for our Republic.

0
MasklessMarvel 0 points ago +1 / -1

Because the AG flipped and is now investigating fraud

-10
deleted -10 points ago +3 / -13
4
Kraken_V_Algorithm 4 points ago +5 / -1

You sound vaccinated

-4
GunValleyIce -4 points ago +1 / -5

the fact that every single (as in 100%) of medical establishments, organizations & hospitals all recommend the vaccine should be another red flag

2
FormerGraveheart 2 points ago +2 / -0

The fact that they all said that it's 100% safe when it hadn't existed for long enough for anyone to know that proves that they are all lying, too.

0
GunValleyIce 0 points ago +1 / -1

None of them said it's 100% safe, and it's not (it's like 99.999%). But it's safer than risking getting covid unvaccinated.

4
Nothinberder 4 points ago +4 / -0

Source?

-7
GunValleyIce -7 points ago +3 / -10

duckduckgo or google "2000 mules debunked" and read, don't take my word for it, just do a little research... no one is ever once shown dropping off ballots at multiple sites, and most of the footage is from georgia, where you can drop off other peoples ballots (as is most every state), also the producers refuse to share information with investigators, when they should be sharing it with anyone/everyone, and new versions of a book have a bunch of stuff retracted, which is a red flag

1
Nothinberder 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why are they wearing latex gloves?

0
GunValleyIce 0 points ago +1 / -1

same reason they're wearing a mask

1
Nothinberder 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mmmmhmmm.

1
Parabellum76 1 point ago +2 / -1

The information they refused to share was the name of their confidential informant.

-2
GunValleyIce -2 points ago +1 / -3

well if it meant uncovering fraud, then they're now part of the problem

2
Parabellum76 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wtf are you a shill or just retarded? Thats literally the opposite of what happened

3
FormerGraveheart 3 points ago +3 / -0

Of course he's a shill. There's a shitton of them here because the mods refuse to take care of them.

0
GunValleyIce 0 points ago +1 / -1

so if naming their confidential source led to the revealing of fraud in the election, why wouldn't they do it again?

0
magamemer 0 points ago +1 / -1

The naming of their source would lead to a DEAD source. But you know that.

3
kiowachief 3 points ago +3 / -0

Found the retard

2
KernalMustard 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's a conspiracy theory till proven fact. As Alex Jones has proven. A lot comes true eventually

-8
GunValleyIce -8 points ago +1 / -9

Almost none of it does... it might even be 100% none.

1
KernalMustard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Inter-dimensional vampires sure. Everything else give it time

1
magamemer 1 point ago +2 / -1

Bullshit.

-2
GunValleyIce -2 points ago +1 / -3

you can duckduckgo or google "2000 mules debunked", and pick one of the several sources, whatever one you want