Calibre's got plugins to just strip DRM. If you can read it, you can decrypt it, and if you can do that, you can just save it decrypted. e-book DRM is the dumbest thing ever.
don't know about reading books digitally but sometimes audiobooks are nice
either it's down to presentation or the people reading the books
for example, tony Robinson has perfect delivery in his reading of the Terry Pratchett audiobooks that in my opinion heightens the comedy its just a shame he only ever did the abridged versions
the tom clancy audiobooks read by Michael Prichard are pretty good as he has a voice that to me just fits the military techno thriller books of tom clancy
sometimes there's a full cast as well one I remember listening to a lot when I was younger was the Redwall audiobook
might have something to do with growing up without a TV and mostly listening to the radio where when I was younger at least the BBC had some top-tier dramatisations on radio 4 (I haven't really paid much attention to what they do these days but its probably 99% woke crap or the writer is painfully average but they are some "minority" so they get boosted (radio 3 has a similar issue with pushing music that is just painfully bad or of little note but its by a woman or a minority that says the right things so they get put front and center - if the BBC is that desperate for female composers just go look at japan and do some music by Yoko Kanno, Yoko Shimamura or Michiru ĹŚshima just to name three off the top of my head I would pay good money for a full live arrangement of some of their work into a full symphony or something)
If you want to have a bit of fun: Go on 4chan or reddit, look for a thread where people share and discuss their favorite books, and mention that you enjoyed reading Atlas Shrugged or The Fountainhead.
The discussion will instantly turn from a circlejerk of everyone complimenting and objectively analyzing each others' book choices to hate-filled rants on how bad of a person Ayn Rand is.
The irony is that Rand is, like most things, Determinism .. based on nothing necessarily deeper, or more transcendent, than its proponents (and adherents) thinking that they are correct.
.. EXACTLY THE_SAME AS ANY TARD TRYING TO DETRACT HER. 🤦‍♂️
(The only, conceivably, superior position being Providence .. as major religions tend to not change daily, weekly, properly ever, along with zealotries for 'the latest thing'.)
And at least Rand was Based. Half of the effort against her is Marxist Propaganda, and half of the other half is their NPCs.
What's your idea of determinism? For me it's just the collection of observations that at any time there are things that are easy to believe and do, and things that are hard to beleive or do, and that technology and its adoption is the number one driver of social change.
Haven't read Rand, so I don't know what she thinks on this, but one point I'll emphasize is that all of what I described is a matter of ethics, not morals. It's just about how people without principles behave, in line with incentives and disincentives. They still need morals to guide them towards the right ethic, and determine what behaviors ought to be easy, and what ought to be hard...
This. I worked the polls with a few leftists. One brought a book to read when it got slow. When she asked if I read books, I told her I was reading Atlas Shrugged, and she went off on Ayn Rand.
Michael Kramer and Kate Reading do a phenomenal job with the Wheel of Time series.
The worst audiobook I've listened to was Catch 22, mostly because of the production (they would randomly have military march music that, rather than separate chapters or even sections in a chapter, would sometimes literally separate two sentences of dialogue from the same character in a single conversation. I honestly don't know why it was there), but partially because the guy reading it just wasn't funny; I honestly don't know how you read that book and barely get me to chuckle twice and never belly laugh.
I started reading the Wheel of Time books back in the 90s. The first three or four were good. But they got boring after that. Robert Jordan should have made it a trilogy and moved on to something else.
My wife listens to audio books but I still like to read them myself and physically turn the pages. Maybe when my eyesight gets worse I may resort to audio books but if it's a good book I'll still get a hard copy to add to he library.
I have been collecting books since I was very young and have amassed a pretty good library of around 2,000 books, all hard backs. I used to keep paperbacks as well but ran out of room and got rid of around 3,500 of them after my wife complained about all the boxes. We have a wall unit that takes up one wall in our library/media room that I want to get rid of so I can expand the bookshelves to accommodate more books but at my age It's doubtful that I'll live long enough to fill them.
I gave up on the first book. Jordan came to do a book signing at my store decades ago and I told him a joke he didn't understand before he went out on the sales floor. He walked out to the waiting fans with a funny puzzled look on his face.
So do I but maybe my kids and grand kids will have the time to read them. I have a good collection of history, engineering, and biographical books. There is also a good selection of science fiction by authors like Asimov and Heinlein.
Damn, you're right. I just looked at The Eye of the World and it was published January 1990. I would have sworn I started reading that when I was stationed in Spain back in the late 70s. I guess they all start to run together after a while. Hell, I'm 68 now and I have read so much science fiction that sometimes even the characters seem to jump from one series to another.
Smh. Fires of Heaven and Lord of Chaos have some of the greatest moments in the series. The next few books are slower but still great, and Knife of Dreams (the last written solely by Robert Jordan before his death) was a massive return to form and one of the top three books in the series.
The closest I got was my kindle but Amazon products just aren’t safe from censorship. There are alternatives and I would like one because I collect historic books and some could be put a little at risk reading them if I’m sloppy but I still would like to read them.
I'm looking for the seven volume set of George Washington: A Biography by Douglas Southall Freeman that's in good shape. I've got the R.E. Lee four volume set.
Buy up Antique history books. Anything before 1950- I have found books from 1830 with details on how to make concrete and the mathematics of how to design bridges and water systems for farms. We don't need globohomo, but we might revert back to 1880s until we get systems built for food production.
Most people grew their own produce in their yard. Dandelions' were brought to America because they grow fast. Bamboo is also a good material for building, and there are fast growing trees that are very practical.
Old encyclopedia collections can usually be had for cheap at thrift stores and definitely the 50s is the sweeter spot for still representing facts close to reality. Another thing I’ve been doing is collecting reprints of foraging guides for my area and practicing identifying edible plants on my property. Just in case. Last year I made sumac tea which was actually quite good. Styxhexenhammer666 also sells edited works of old us agriculture guides and has written some guides on foraging and traditional cures
The one I like given I’m in Amish country is a guide explaining how nutty some of the German refugees were from the world wars as many settled here.
Agreed. I have a partial collection from early 1800. It tells you how to make everything, including basic farm engines they had in Victorian times. Yea, they had complex hydraulics made from primitive materials too.
Even, how to process raw oil into diesel. There were few gas stations around, and farms did not depend on them. It looked like cities were more dependent on farms back then, and that is the natural order of things.
I love my early 1900s dictionary (either 1900s or 1910s, the publication page was lost probably about 80 years ago). Lots of fun to be had seeing what definitions have changed, and how. Gender being the biggest one I think.
I liked the movie The Ninth Gate in part because of the ambiance. Being in a hundred year-old mansion out in the country reading from a collection of centuries old books and a glass of wine in front of the fireplace seems like a very pleasant and intellectually stimulating way to unplug from the rest of the world.
And, despite all that, you have to specifically want digital copies for that to be relevant information. For the same cost as those generators and solar panels, you could buy hard copies. Electronics fail and have weaknesses and so do hard copies. Your preference is just that: a preference.
A battery that weighs less than one shelf of books can power an e-reader for a year.
MILLIONS of books can be stored on a 4TB USB-C HD (which only needs to be attached to copy selected books onto a reader).
A good paper library costs and weighs more than a huge amount of solar panels, lithium batteries, NAT storage server, laptops / e-paper readers, etc.
And of course they can be proliferated and spread by copying from device to device, even without the Internet. Copying paper requires a lot more effort.
My high school drafting teacher let me take home all the old drafting and architecture books. I keep them because they are cool, and it's an art that has pretty much all but disappeared. Geometry, engineering, drawing by hand, love it. IDK, maybe one day society will be grateful for them again....
Drafting and wood shop were some of the only classes I actually liked in high school. I do most of my drawing in autocad now, but the things you learn in those books is still relevant.
I like both. I do technically have more books than guns…because books are smaller and way cheaper. But, limp wrists try to intelligence signal over books. Anyone can own and read a shit ton of books. It doesn’t make you smart. It doesn’t give you natural intelligence. People like this have proven they lack reasoning and critical thinking skills, regardless of his calls of self proclaimed intelligence. He’s proof that you can spout off about being smart, and still be dumb as a rock.
Anyone can own and read a shit ton of books. It doesn’t make you smart. It doesn’t give you natural intelligence.
Most of these people amass libraries with books all on the same subjects or all from the same perspective. I'm sure Captain TDS has 35 books all about how Trump is a terrible no good person.
A library is nothing without an open mind to use it.
I've got piles and piles of quality fiction novels as well as survival guides, horticulture, fishing, hunting, livestock, pickling, cooking, preserving, reference, etc.
You should however, have more rounds of ammo than books.
what kind of a cunt thinks he has a right to supplant another free mans right to protect himself with firearms because hes renting a house from him?! go on mash some buttons and explain to us all how a landlord has any authority to abolish your god given rights.
You’re getting downvoted but you’re right about contracts. So long as the parties mutually agree and weren’t fraudulently induced or under duress, people can agree to most anything so long as it’s not an illegal activity. That’s the beauty of having the ability to contract recognized by law - it gives people the ability to agree to and make their own enforceable laws privately between one another based upon the circumstance and need.
There are rights you cannot sign away by contract and most contract provisions aren't actually enforceable. For example, a contract with a landlord can't actually alter the eviction procedure. That's outside of the scope and overridden by existing law.
Just because you signed a contract doesn't mean the state is going to send the cops in to back your play. If you can't find a reasonable way to enforce your own provisions, you can pound sand.
Contracts aren't magic. They just lay out the terms of agreement and capture signatures. That's literally all they can do.
Offloading the justification of you opinion to others doesn't make it a better arguement. I've read plenty on that line of thought, and it's all drivel at the end of the day.
Wrong again. Check your “Strunk and White” or a text on English grammar for the usage of “whom” as the object of a preposition. You could even just read it aloud to see how wrong it sounds.
In any case, it most certainly is not “that”, you victim of public education.
When shit goes Mad Max and roving bands of armed gangs roam the landscape in search of food and resources, your books will make a nice, warmth-giving fire by which they can eat the contents of your pantry.
Books can also teach you how to defend yourself from those roving armed gangs and live a life not dependent on others to provide you with food, water, shelter, etc
If he's refering to his collection of fantasy bullshit books, those don't count either. Liberals always collect fantasy horse shit and wrinkle their nose at non fiction and historical books. Forever a child in their minds.
leftiest try to cast gun owners as poorly educated fools. Take the high ground and show them up with knowledge. Ask for historical context of genocide with gun owners, read books on gun rights and oppressive authoritative rulers.
On Gunday, strange that most of the comments on this thread are about books, favorites, or types of books. Seems pedes are readers, not just gun enthusiasts.
Our guns haven't killed anyone meanwhile his ideology is essentially genocide... they murder so many babies in the womb and push kids to kill themselves with this gender shit
Anyone who wants to live seperate from woke culture should own physical copies of books. But you should also own guns.
I was never able to get into reading books digitally. I always viewed my hardbound books as trophies. Plus they good at sparking conversation.
As a side note, I use a Kindle for books that I previously would have gotten in paperback
There’s an airplane mode hack for getting library books on your kindle and keeping them indefinitely, I’ve heard.
Calibre's got plugins to just strip DRM. If you can read it, you can decrypt it, and if you can do that, you can just save it decrypted. e-book DRM is the dumbest thing ever.
don't know about reading books digitally but sometimes audiobooks are nice
either it's down to presentation or the people reading the books
for example, tony Robinson has perfect delivery in his reading of the Terry Pratchett audiobooks that in my opinion heightens the comedy its just a shame he only ever did the abridged versions
the tom clancy audiobooks read by Michael Prichard are pretty good as he has a voice that to me just fits the military techno thriller books of tom clancy
sometimes there's a full cast as well one I remember listening to a lot when I was younger was the Redwall audiobook
might have something to do with growing up without a TV and mostly listening to the radio where when I was younger at least the BBC had some top-tier dramatisations on radio 4 (I haven't really paid much attention to what they do these days but its probably 99% woke crap or the writer is painfully average but they are some "minority" so they get boosted (radio 3 has a similar issue with pushing music that is just painfully bad or of little note but its by a woman or a minority that says the right things so they get put front and center - if the BBC is that desperate for female composers just go look at japan and do some music by Yoko Kanno, Yoko Shimamura or Michiru ĹŚshima just to name three off the top of my head I would pay good money for a full live arrangement of some of their work into a full symphony or something)
If you want to have a bit of fun: Go on 4chan or reddit, look for a thread where people share and discuss their favorite books, and mention that you enjoyed reading Atlas Shrugged or The Fountainhead.
The discussion will instantly turn from a circlejerk of everyone complimenting and objectively analyzing each others' book choices to hate-filled rants on how bad of a person Ayn Rand is.
The irony is that Rand is, like most things, Determinism .. based on nothing necessarily deeper, or more transcendent, than its proponents (and adherents) thinking that they are correct.
.. EXACTLY THE_SAME AS ANY TARD TRYING TO DETRACT HER. 🤦‍♂️
(The only, conceivably, superior position being Providence .. as major religions tend to not change daily, weekly, properly ever, along with zealotries for 'the latest thing'.)
And at least Rand was Based. Half of the effort against her is Marxist Propaganda, and half of the other half is their NPCs.
What's your idea of determinism? For me it's just the collection of observations that at any time there are things that are easy to believe and do, and things that are hard to beleive or do, and that technology and its adoption is the number one driver of social change.
Haven't read Rand, so I don't know what she thinks on this, but one point I'll emphasize is that all of what I described is a matter of ethics, not morals. It's just about how people without principles behave, in line with incentives and disincentives. They still need morals to guide them towards the right ethic, and determine what behaviors ought to be easy, and what ought to be hard...
There are several reasons for that :p
This. I worked the polls with a few leftists. One brought a book to read when it got slow. When she asked if I read books, I told her I was reading Atlas Shrugged, and she went off on Ayn Rand.
A belief in liberty will not be tolerated in the land of tolerance comrade!
You're allowed to believe in some of the same things as her without advocating literally everything. Fuck off.
Michael Kramer and Kate Reading do a phenomenal job with the Wheel of Time series.
The worst audiobook I've listened to was Catch 22, mostly because of the production (they would randomly have military march music that, rather than separate chapters or even sections in a chapter, would sometimes literally separate two sentences of dialogue from the same character in a single conversation. I honestly don't know why it was there), but partially because the guy reading it just wasn't funny; I honestly don't know how you read that book and barely get me to chuckle twice and never belly laugh.
I started reading the Wheel of Time books back in the 90s. The first three or four were good. But they got boring after that. Robert Jordan should have made it a trilogy and moved on to something else.
My wife listens to audio books but I still like to read them myself and physically turn the pages. Maybe when my eyesight gets worse I may resort to audio books but if it's a good book I'll still get a hard copy to add to he library.
I have been collecting books since I was very young and have amassed a pretty good library of around 2,000 books, all hard backs. I used to keep paperbacks as well but ran out of room and got rid of around 3,500 of them after my wife complained about all the boxes. We have a wall unit that takes up one wall in our library/media room that I want to get rid of so I can expand the bookshelves to accommodate more books but at my age It's doubtful that I'll live long enough to fill them.
I gave up on the first book. Jordan came to do a book signing at my store decades ago and I told him a joke he didn't understand before he went out on the sales floor. He walked out to the waiting fans with a funny puzzled look on his face.
My problem is I have more than I can read in my remaining life span.
So do I but maybe my kids and grand kids will have the time to read them. I have a good collection of history, engineering, and biographical books. There is also a good selection of science fiction by authors like Asimov and Heinlein.
The first wheel of time book came out in 1990. If you didn't like them, you'll really hate the woke tv series that Amazon made.
Damn, you're right. I just looked at The Eye of the World and it was published January 1990. I would have sworn I started reading that when I was stationed in Spain back in the late 70s. I guess they all start to run together after a while. Hell, I'm 68 now and I have read so much science fiction that sometimes even the characters seem to jump from one series to another.
Smh. Fires of Heaven and Lord of Chaos have some of the greatest moments in the series. The next few books are slower but still great, and Knife of Dreams (the last written solely by Robert Jordan before his death) was a massive return to form and one of the top three books in the series.
Physical books still exist even if their digital versions vaporized.
music and movies sadly going extinct
Vinyl is making a big come back.
The closest I got was my kindle but Amazon products just aren’t safe from censorship. There are alternatives and I would like one because I collect historic books and some could be put a little at risk reading them if I’m sloppy but I still would like to read them.
As long as it is in mobi, pdf or AZW3 format you can transfer it to your kindle even if you never let your kindle online.
I'm looking for the seven volume set of George Washington: A Biography by Douglas Southall Freeman that's in good shape. I've got the R.E. Lee four volume set.
I prefer books like you do. I also prefer cds. I like to have something to look at and physically hold.
Buy up Antique history books. Anything before 1950- I have found books from 1830 with details on how to make concrete and the mathematics of how to design bridges and water systems for farms. We don't need globohomo, but we might revert back to 1880s until we get systems built for food production.
Most people grew their own produce in their yard. Dandelions' were brought to America because they grow fast. Bamboo is also a good material for building, and there are fast growing trees that are very practical.
Old encyclopedia collections can usually be had for cheap at thrift stores and definitely the 50s is the sweeter spot for still representing facts close to reality. Another thing I’ve been doing is collecting reprints of foraging guides for my area and practicing identifying edible plants on my property. Just in case. Last year I made sumac tea which was actually quite good. Styxhexenhammer666 also sells edited works of old us agriculture guides and has written some guides on foraging and traditional cures
The one I like given I’m in Amish country is a guide explaining how nutty some of the German refugees were from the world wars as many settled here.
Agreed. I have a partial collection from early 1800. It tells you how to make everything, including basic farm engines they had in Victorian times. Yea, they had complex hydraulics made from primitive materials too.
Even, how to process raw oil into diesel. There were few gas stations around, and farms did not depend on them. It looked like cities were more dependent on farms back then, and that is the natural order of things.
I love my early 1900s dictionary (either 1900s or 1910s, the publication page was lost probably about 80 years ago). Lots of fun to be had seeing what definitions have changed, and how. Gender being the biggest one I think.
Niggardly
Wasn't 'gender' the polite Victorian way to refer to 'female sex human', without saying, 'sex' and referring to the act?
Not sure about Victorian times, but in my dictionary its definition is "the grammatical distinction of sex."
I liked the movie The Ninth Gate in part because of the ambiance. Being in a hundred year-old mansion out in the country reading from a collection of centuries old books and a glass of wine in front of the fireplace seems like a very pleasant and intellectually stimulating way to unplug from the rest of the world.
Then you pay attention to who made it and what It's about. Things that make you go hmmmmm
Digital copies are still "physical", merely very tiny and convenient to search.
But only as long as they are in your control, and your technology is secure.
Always make backups, ideally to read-only media.
Never use proprietary software.
If the power goes out, I can still read my physical book.
Power going out is 20th century problem.
Own multiple generators, solar panels, batteries, etc.
Phones run at like 1-5 watts, charge at 5-10 watts. Laptops run at 10-20 watts when just reading text. E-paper uses almost no power at all.
And, despite all that, you have to specifically want digital copies for that to be relevant information. For the same cost as those generators and solar panels, you could buy hard copies. Electronics fail and have weaknesses and so do hard copies. Your preference is just that: a preference.
It’s only as secure as your electricity supply is. I can read mine by moonlight after 100 days of no electricity
A battery that weighs less than one shelf of books can power an e-reader for a year.
MILLIONS of books can be stored on a 4TB USB-C HD (which only needs to be attached to copy selected books onto a reader).
A good paper library costs and weighs more than a huge amount of solar panels, lithium batteries, NAT storage server, laptops / e-paper readers, etc.
And of course they can be proliferated and spread by copying from device to device, even without the Internet. Copying paper requires a lot more effort.
They aren't digging thousands year old SSDs out of tombs in the middle east
(Disclaimer: this is a JOKE)
They should.
One SSD (Storyteller, Scammer, and Degenerate) is buried at Masjid al Nabawi Masjid al Nabawi.
They should dig up some bone DNA and see if people claiming to be descendants of The Mohammad are right. For science!
(Disclaimer: this is a joke. Swoosh, there goes my head.)
Books AND guns are the best combo.
My high school drafting teacher let me take home all the old drafting and architecture books. I keep them because they are cool, and it's an art that has pretty much all but disappeared. Geometry, engineering, drawing by hand, love it. IDK, maybe one day society will be grateful for them again....
Drafting and wood shop were some of the only classes I actually liked in high school. I do most of my drawing in autocad now, but the things you learn in those books is still relevant.
Source: am architect.
Half those books should be on how to make more guns.
Old gunsmithing books are the bee's knees.
One of my favorites:
https://thehomegunsmith.com/pdf/Expedient-Homemade-Firearms-Vol-II-PA-Luty.pdf
This guy built one of those (and shoots it): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YE9J7qcj0c
Yes, but if I had more guns than books I would need another house to store all the guns.
Pay your 8 bucks turdrich
I like both. I do technically have more books than guns…because books are smaller and way cheaper. But, limp wrists try to intelligence signal over books. Anyone can own and read a shit ton of books. It doesn’t make you smart. It doesn’t give you natural intelligence. People like this have proven they lack reasoning and critical thinking skills, regardless of his calls of self proclaimed intelligence. He’s proof that you can spout off about being smart, and still be dumb as a rock.
You can have all the knowledge in the world.
And no wisdom to understand and apply it.
Those with "Knowledge" vs those with "Wisdom" is the great divider in society.
Also depends on the types of books one owns. This asshole probably owns a ton of pro-socialism and/or anti-Trump books.
Exactly. If you read 300 books full of bullshit, are you smarter when you’re done?
You know how to identify bullshit, hopefully.
40 copies of Fire and Fury.
It's the "read a book" leftist meme. Of course, they mean read exclusively leftist propoganda.
But if you have intelligence it gives you a broader understanding of the world including insight into these nutbags and yourself.
Most of these people amass libraries with books all on the same subjects or all from the same perspective. I'm sure Captain TDS has 35 books all about how Trump is a terrible no good person.
A library is nothing without an open mind to use it.
Should have lots of guns and lots of books.
I've got piles and piles of quality fiction novels as well as survival guides, horticulture, fishing, hunting, livestock, pickling, cooking, preserving, reference, etc.
You should however, have more rounds of ammo than books.
Typical low IQ leftist tweet.
Same. My books fall into the category of fiction they want gone, actual history not woke history, then books that help me survive off grid if needed.
make rifle ownership compulsory!
For sane adults who own property.
Children need their parents permission.
Renters need permission from their landlord.
renters have 2nd amendment rights too, what is this fuckery?
You make a contract with your landlord.
Don't like the terms, find another landlord.
Rights are negative, not positive.
Right To Life means murder is a no-no. It doesn't mean Mommy Government must provide you with food, medicine, etc.
2A means the government can't ban privately owned weapons, but private interests can.
what kind of a cunt thinks he has a right to supplant another free mans right to protect himself with firearms because hes renting a house from him?! go on mash some buttons and explain to us all how a landlord has any authority to abolish your god given rights.
A contract is a contract.
The landlord can make any conditions he wants - no smoking, no pets, no guns, etc. You are free to go elsewhere.
This leads to responsible people having guns, and degenerates not. Free market FTW!
You’re getting downvoted but you’re right about contracts. So long as the parties mutually agree and weren’t fraudulently induced or under duress, people can agree to most anything so long as it’s not an illegal activity. That’s the beauty of having the ability to contract recognized by law - it gives people the ability to agree to and make their own enforceable laws privately between one another based upon the circumstance and need.
There are rights you cannot sign away by contract and most contract provisions aren't actually enforceable. For example, a contract with a landlord can't actually alter the eviction procedure. That's outside of the scope and overridden by existing law.
Just because you signed a contract doesn't mean the state is going to send the cops in to back your play. If you can't find a reasonable way to enforce your own provisions, you can pound sand.
Contracts aren't magic. They just lay out the terms of agreement and capture signatures. That's literally all they can do.
a cunt is a cunt.
Nah. Low IQ take.
Read Jefferson, Mises, Rothbard, and Hoppe.
Offloading the justification of you opinion to others doesn't make it a better arguement. I've read plenty on that line of thought, and it's all drivel at the end of the day.
Ok commie.
Free guns backed by government force are your version of gay marriage.
You cannot force others to accept you.
Earn it.
It's Aids Eric Clapton
Bullshit.
Oh, and it’s “anyone who”…
Wrong again. Check your “Strunk and White” or a text on English grammar for the usage of “whom” as the object of a preposition. You could even just read it aloud to see how wrong it sounds.
In any case, it most certainly is not “that”, you victim of public education.
When shit goes Mad Max and roving bands of armed gangs roam the landscape in search of food and resources, your books will make a nice, warmth-giving fire by which they can eat the contents of your pantry.
Those books are important for rebuilding society and depending on the books they could be important for your own survival.
Books can also teach you how to defend yourself from those roving armed gangs and live a life not dependent on others to provide you with food, water, shelter, etc
Or they will be food for your chickens for a while.
I only have 15 guns and I have several dozen books. So yea, more books.
If he's refering to his collection of fantasy bullshit books, those don't count either. Liberals always collect fantasy horse shit and wrinkle their nose at non fiction and historical books. Forever a child in their minds.
Glad to hear I'm not part of the problem. Hundreds of books but only dozens of guns
But also if someone kicks in my door at 3AM I’d rather be slinging bullets in their direction than books..
Sleep with a king James on your chest just in case they shoot first. My teaching edition could stop a 45 I bet.
Uhm, who has more guns than books with these prices??
Well I guess I meet with this clown’s approval, then. I’ve got a thousand or more books and only sixty or seventy guns.
Everyone has access to millions of books on the Internet.
You can't just download a gun when you need one.
Don't copy that floppy!
Ms Jeff. the books we read warned us about commie scum such as yourself, hence the need for more guns.
leftiest try to cast gun owners as poorly educated fools. Take the high ground and show them up with knowledge. Ask for historical context of genocide with gun owners, read books on gun rights and oppressive authoritative rulers.
I have a masters in finance and an MBA, but I'll also pump you full of lead of you try to break into my place.
Never trust a man who uses tampons.
That’s the point, being a “problem” for the shit government you support.
On Gunday, strange that most of the comments on this thread are about books, favorites, or types of books. Seems pedes are readers, not just gun enthusiasts.
I have a lot of books
I have both...I'm Jeff's worst nightmare.
Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke Poke
....then when we react.....SHRIEK "You violent MAGAT terrorists!"
COULTER'S LAW!...oh wait they're white?
FALSE FLAG!!
Ftfy
Our guns haven't killed anyone meanwhile his ideology is essentially genocide... they murder so many babies in the womb and push kids to kill themselves with this gender shit
This nerd probably has a million ebooks and audio books too, but I can't have a gun that shoots too fast or too quietly.
Their woke garbage and fantasy books make them such a great person, and more intellectual & moral than everyone else.
The guy is a pro fag. I hate when people start something off by saying “pro tip”
A home filled with books is useless if 1.) the books have never been read 2.) they're shitty books to begin with
I defend myself against violent intruders by reading to them.
Yah, read them any leftist paving stone: it'll drop 'em in their tracks.
Jeffy has been a fucking clown for years
I'm thinking the people with all books and no guns are the real problem.
books didnt stop the nazis
The constitution didn’t stop tyranny, it was the lead that followed.