FINALLY, FINALLY, FINALLY - National Group Uncovers Real-Time Democrat Election Fraud - HERE'S HOW THEY DID IT
Here’s How They DID IT! Real-Time Election Fraud Guest post by Jay Valentine – reprinted with permission from American Thinker Database latency – geeky term, but it’s how they DID It! A policeman pulls over a speeder. The police computer fortunately picks up that 3 hours ago a similar vehicle and person held up…
That is precisely the question. We have so much evidence of election fraud. But time and time again nothing is ever done about it. So what difference is this going to make? Unfortunately, the people that control the narrative also control the country.
This isn’t evidence. Maybe the author has evidence but if so he hasn’t shared it yet.
The author shared the method without the data. But the data exists. This is why the communists have instituted ERIC and embedded their people in election offices. The Democrats have real time access to the voter rolls and returned ballot tallies. They know who has voted and who hasn't voted and they have millions of fraud registrations on the books that they only need to assign a ballot to to steal any election they want.
And this is what "ballot harvesting" really looks like. Harvesting mail in ballots from mailboxes of others so the Democrats can vote on behalf of others.
https://rumble.com/vlg5rt-two-women-appear-to-steal-california-gubernatorial-election-recall-ballots-.html
I'm not getting gaslit by the RINO media establishment so as to accept their rigged results. These people have stolen so much and will happily continue to do so and free and fair elections is the only thing that can stop them, so they do everything in their power to make sure those don't happen.
The steal has been happening for a long time. Why do you think congress' approval ratings are so low - NOBODY wants these people in office - they put themselves in there with the steal. And will continue to do so until one gets hanged.
Ding ding ding
You also hang the ones covering up for them.
Ruby Freeman quickly exits the chat
The title is horribly incorrect. Weve had maga-crap-tons of evidence since 2020... So puting "finally" in the title makes it sound like weve never had evidence. we hardly need any its obvious and dems and puppets love to gaslight the shit out of us over it
The Democrats/RINOs have very few voters but a decisive number of ballots. It is proven RINO participation in these schemes that has thwarted necessary investigations and change.
Exactly right.
It takes two to commit a crime, one who actually does it, and the person who looks the other way while it happens.
So they changed the zip code and mailed the ballots to a false address to make false ballots available for cheating?
Call me old-school, but maybe we should be looking at what addresses these ballots were mailed to and who owns the property and who gets mail there? Just a thought.
They're sending to ballots to people that didn't request them and intercepting them one way or another, either through the USPS or having them delivered to an address where they can easily be picked up by their "harvesters".
If by changing the zipcode to one that does not exist, and thus making the ballot undeliverable, it will just be returned to sender. Right? No cloak and dagger. Just US Mail Protocol.
A claim that a scheme like this is POSSIBLE should motivate honest officials to investigate and tighten up processes. But that’s totally different from proof that it occurred.
We know that it occurred in Wisconsin per the Gableman report. It has been proven 100%.
Agreed about documented lawbreaking in 2020, and suspicious, documented+disenfranchising systems failure in Maricopa 2022.
I’m talking about this article though. It makes a claim but doesn’t share evidence.
That seems to be a pattern with this particular author, Jay Valentine. I know he's been involved in the election integrity movement, but his articles in American Thinker come across as marketing efforts for his website (to me.) Sometimes I find the GWP articles helpful, but this kind of clickbait title by Hoft is annoying; Valentine doesn't provide any specifics about the 31K voters with changed zip codes on Sept 3. He doesn't provide a state, or the group that's working to pursue this.
If we really want receipts into the open congress need only begin a new j6/2020 election investigation with one question. Who ordered the shutdown of vote counting in all 2020 swing states? Most Democrat vote theft is decentralized indoctrination and vote stealing training via NGOs. This one decision required command and control and with a RICO case would lead to mass arrests.
Who shutdown the vote count on election night in 2020? Subpoena the records, phone, email, of every election official in the swing states, and every fake news organization and the answer will come out.
Also see unicorns, bigfoot, loch Ness monster, leprechauns, and women that break the hot vs crazy matrix.
My gf is too hot, can confirm
In 2010 I was poll watcher during Sharron Angle/Harry Reid contest.
Another R watcher and I just watched.
The D's came in every hour and got a list who had voted, poured over the registration list comparing, then left and presumably called/kidnapped those D's who had not yet voted.
We had no direction, no legal support, felt pretty helpless watching the pros in action.
Now it's all electronic, but neither party should be allowed access to current voter tallies prior to certified numbers.
As a solution to the current problems, you're making a flawed assumption that the party handling the election data is itself non-partisan.
We need to move to a blockchain voting system. It needs to be simple and clear so democrats can't muddy the waters and confuse people. When they bring up privacy, tell them people are very vocal about who they're voting for anyway, privacy in voting has never been a concern until there's an idea that limits or eliminates your ability to control elections.
The blockchain will be controlled by no one. It will be a live, fully open, real time view of an election. People can find their own votes and make sure they went the way they were supposed to. A voter's ability to vote will be tied to their social security number so dead people can't vote.
I need a team of coders and thinkers and I'll be able to present this solution to any state. There will no longer be a need for voter rolls. Anyone can audit the blockchain by simply going to the website. If they're hellbent on using voting machines, let's have the machines reporting live. No one can hack the blockchain, anyone can see it anywhere in the world, but no one can influence it unless they're voting.
This is literally the only way forward. We're not going back to paper ballots, that's pretty fucking clear at this point.
At this point I'd prefer a retinal scan or blood dna on the ballot lol
This will devolve to mob rule. Once you have a voting app on your phone using blockchain, there will be no requirement a voter be informed and motivated. The results will despite your assurances to block chain will be easily hacked.
It won't be on a phone. In order to record your vote on the blockchain, you need to go to a polling place. If you think a blockchain can be hacked, you need to do some research.
Maybe you should do some research. The Blockchain database might be immutable, but transactions (like say recording a vote) can be vulnerable. Crypto hacks have stolen over 3 Billion dollars just this year.
https://fortune.com/crypto/2022/10/13/october-record-3-billion-stolen-in-crypto-hacks-2022/
If they have proof of this and it is not just hypothetical, then I'd call that evidence.
Of course. So would I. Sadly, the internet is full of wild claims of possession of startling evidence, and when you press to deliver the goods, they start dragging it out, making excuses, blaming other people.
Yes, I’m jaded and tired of the hopium.
And still two years later not one person has come forward ,to confirm all this ,not one postal worker has confirmed ,the undelivered mail was picked up ,(my opinion was it was never sent out in the first place ,but simply gathered at the printers and delivered in bulk to Democrat boiler rooms for filling out ,and even that's a inconvenience ,how many envelopes were found with different zip codes that look Sus ????
If they're just printing out the ballots and taking them, why even bother with something as risky as leaving an electronic address change trail?
Pretty big IF... Why not show it. Are they going to charge $8.95 for video of the evidence?
True, but a court would need to hear the case.
That's a big IF. Why is this article being put out, and stickied, without knowing whether the info is hypothetical or not? Do they have the receipts, or not?
It is suspicious that wasn't made clear.
Take my point. I made the same argument in the first thread (that wasn't sensationalized nearly as much by the HOFT drama fags).
Came here to say this. There's no evidence, in fact, I feel like the author stumbled upon a tutorial for SQL and came up with this theory.
Wouldn't USPS just return to sender the ballots if the address is invalid? How are the ballots getting intercepted then? What's the point of mailing them to aj undeliverable address if they go back to the sender anyway?
This article is basically "how to steal ballots with extra steps".
Exactly. Sounds like speculation.
And not only is nothing done about it, but moron leftists never stop gaslighting, pretending evidence doesn't exist.
I have evidence that you are a Democrat shill. I will share it in two weeks. Meanwhile I expect you to be banned and canceled from P.win. /s
See how that works? Do I really have such evidence? Nobody knows, because I haven’t shared specifics.
Do you actually think there isn't evidence? Anyone who believes that at this point is just willfully ignorant, and sharing information is wasted on such people. I've done it too many times. Such people always dismiss sources out of hand and don't even look at them. It's a time suck and waste of patriots' time to worry about the attacks of people who are uninterested in truth.
I'm sure they have some speculation and affidavits.
Oh no, I’m totally with you that there was enough evidence of lawbreaking to invalidate 2020, and probably Maricopa 2022 and others.
I’m talking about this article - it didn’t share any specific evidence.
ok. sorry for lashing out at you.
No worries pede. We are all frustrated and angry about lying commies destroying our nation and not even caring about being out in the open in many cases, because they know the justice system is packed with lying commies like themselves.
It is not a recipe for national peace and prosperity.
What's harder to find than evidence of election fraud?
An honest, mainstream journalist who will report on it.
A judge that will accept it into court.
Keep faith, even if we don't make legal ground (though we pray we do) with this evidence, it is not useless. History remembers, and the more we collect the more difficult it will be for our history to be erased. "Every book was rewritten" as Orwell said. We must thus write more books, faster than they can silence them.
I like your spirit.
We know that there are 2,700 workers were fired, effective immediately, on November 23, 2022. Biden/McConnell/Schumer are throwing 115,000 rail workers out of work for Christmas, 60,000 pipe workers and God only knows how many other individuals and families have suffered directly from Election Fraud.
The cheaters control the money, the Judges, the media, all we have is a whole bunch of out-of-work family men who get the finger daily from the likes of Katie Hobbs, Robin Vos, and Bill Gates.
Maybe we can convince them to join the people of Arizona and shut down the state until this travesty of an election is thrown out and a new one, run by different people is scheduled.
Yep, the ball is in the DOJ of many states/counties court now. Are you going to be spineless pussies and continue pretending fraud doesn't exist and dragging your feet, or, are you going to lead the charge in saving this damn ship and put some motherfuckers in prison?
Redpill more people? Idk.
Nothing, and you will conform to what the cheaters want while all those "anti tyranny guns" gather dust.
I think we all know the answer.
about what?
the article is entirely theoretical. it gives a way to cheat, doesn't accuse any particular county or name anyone where this is alleged to have happened.
if you meant, how to fix theoretical loophole here - make sure those databases maintain history of their changes.
Three "finally" is equivalent to two "tick tocks" and .5 "kracken".
And 1 Boom!
How many "BREAKING" and "BOMBSHELL"'s is that equal to, factoring in the Bidenflation?
It's the beginning of the end for the walls to close in.
Make sure to keep your champagne on ice
Our votes are finally going to be counted?
Where are the red siren emojis?
Well, factoring in Bidenflation™, the 3 FINALLYs we have here make it somewhere between a BREAKING & a BOOM.
If OP had made it 4 FINALLYs it would be equivalent to 1 BOOM, arguably the more efficient way of describing this post. 2 BOOMs and we're now entering BOMBSHELL territory and of course as we all know, 1 BOMBSHELL is half a KRAKEN. 4 BREAKINGs is equal to 1 BOMBSHELL therefore we can safely assume that 1 BOMBSHELL + 2 BOOMS is equal to 1 full KRAKEN, or 15 FINALLYs + 2 TICK TOCKS. 2 TICK TOCKs + 2 FINALLYs + 1 BREAKING = 1 BOOM. I hope that clears things up.
One boom of disappointment
2 more week bruh
Don't worry, my man, they don't call Jeff Sessions the "Silent Executioner" for nothing!
Not trying to blackpill but I'll eat my hat if anything actually comes of this.
There's enough canvassing efforts ongoing nationwide that sooner or later there's going to be a breakthrough. You can't cover up a crime of this magnitude forever.
Not sure what happens at that point, but the truth is going to come out for all to see.
You underestimate how many people say "I don't care about cheating as long as my team wins".
Maybe. Over on Twitter, I posited that we should have forensic audits of EVERY politician and let's see where the money leads. Rip the bandaid off, party affiliation be damned.
You'd think that would be a bipartisan issue.......but not really.
Many states hardly have money to do functional elections and now you think they will be able to afford forensic audits.
I don't think we can afford to NOT do it, but I have a plan where this pays for itself.
First we abolish the IRS. Then, we give all of those IRS employees bounty based audit contracts for all public officials.
Taxpayer wins on the front, middle, and back end.
Even many republicans are starting to think like this. Having rigged elections all over the place only staunchly solidfy the wicked tyranny of this establishment and thus erode not only any peaceful resistance movements... but erode the country itself.
We live in perilous times!
Honestly the entire write up was a bunch of technobabble.
I thought it was explained decently well for a layman to understand.
but it's meaningless. They entire article can be summed up (if I'm understanding it correctly) with "election officials changed the mailing address of 30,000 voters and then changed them back before anyone noticed."
They mention the NCOA database, but the NCOA is irrelevant because that's a database run by the USPS only for people who change their address through the USPS.
They mention different database technologies, but the actual database system used to keep the voter rolls and system used by the RNC are irrelevant because any database system can exist in a high latency or low latency environment depending on it's configuration.
Lastly, the USPS is very good with zip codes. They invented them and they control them. Changing the zip code may not result in mail being returned to sender because the USPS can correct the zip code on the fly. You kinda/sorta see this in action by using the "find a zipcode" feature on the USPS's website. Ultimately whether or not a mail piece gets returned depends on the service endorsements and the agreements the particular jurisdiction has with the postal service or their managed mail provider. And in order to get the full automation pricing their database first needs to be processed through a USPS-approved CASS database.
Wouldn't a record of these switches remain on the computers?
Thanks, that's what I was alluding to.
Now how to get ahold of those hard drives?
They're doing this all over the country. I'd hope we could find evidence on at least one hard drive.
For databases, any changes to the data is documented. It will have what is changed when it was changed, and who changed it. All of this is logged. An average user would not have the skills or access to cover their tracks. Altering the logs in most cases will result in more logged information. For security reasons, the database should be on a server that cannot be directly accessed. Meaning, users should have a limited-use interface to the database. But I have heard and seen horror stories of unlocked server rooms, passwords being "password", etc.
My guess would be that most counties require changes to voter rolls to be documented with time/date info, and the name of the person that made them. I believe Maricopa does, but Liz Harris had evidence in her AZ canvassing report of changes made to their voter rolls without any explanation about who made the changes. Which shouldn't happen.
So as usual...the system is only as good as the integrity of the people that use it...
Depends. Maricopa has a history of some IT staff helping hide stuff. It depends on several things. How were the changes made? and How is the database designed?
So in theory either the software tracking the changes, or the DB triggers tracking the changes can all satisfy laws and rules about tracking changes. But any IT person with sufficient access can disables those temporarily and make changes.
You would have to have a good IT Sys Admin working with any lawyer to help them understand exactly what type of system and OS logs to subpoena to get even circumstantial evidence that the bad DB Admin did illegal changes. And then Maricopa will just sit on the subpoena while they purge the system logs.. Just like the 2020 election.
Thank you for the helpful info about how this works. I sure agree about Maricopa's proven preferences for ignoring subpoenas and purging logs.
i hate the upbeat sensationalized tone and the exclamation points and the bolded opinions etc
like holy shit tabloid level cringe
I don't know why anyone uses, reads or links to that shit hole site. Any story on that site that has even a kernel of truth to it would be covered by more reputable sites without all the pop up ads, flashing lights and circus music, not to mention the tabloid level "journalism" and general lack of integrity.
<nod> <nod>
Dude, the article was written at a 6th grade reading level. If that.
This is American Thinker reprinted vis GWP with some minor formatting changes, not the usual GWP artilce. American Thinker can be a bit of a dense read.
https://youtu.be/Zd0p96miSK8?t=34
OK. Have a witness document this in public with very specific examples.
No more vague claims. Even if true, if they can’t make a specific, documented claim then it can’t go anywhere.
No more “two weeks, and then powerful evidence will be revealed”.
The thing that annoys me about this kind of article (hyped up by GWP with that awful headline) is it hurts the credibility of others that have done good work and presented evidence of actual election fraud.
If you go to Valentine's website (linked in the article) he seems to be riding on the coattails of lots of other people. True The Vote, Look Ahead America, Bobby Piton, Liz Harris, Jovan Pulitzer, Patrick Byrne's America Project and others have all dug into the question of voter roll corruption, and the role that USPS has almost certainly played in rigging elections. Valentine's website makes use of the information surfaced by all of these people, without giving credit. That bugs me.
They're talking about exploiting a systemic shortcoming. Nobody implements a system with such a glaring fundamental flaw unless it was intended.
Ie, banks taking two weeks to clear your check so they can use the float.
Possibly, could also just be old systems (which governments have many of) that were never upgraded that people have found modern tools to take advantage of the weaknesses.
great! more shit to piss us off! hooray!
As always when it comes to tech stuff. Idiot non techies make up stupid fucking terms and will get laughed out of the court because of it. DB Latency is a shit term here. The voting address database is separate from the USPS database, so they can change it without affecting the real mail database. Nothing to do with Latency. This is also why you can move and notify the USPS of change of address but your Ballots keeps getting sent out for... years.. to your old address.
The person or person writing the article is a marketing person and comes up with new words.
That "database latency" term bothered me too, so I appreciate your take on it. It reminds me of Pulitzer's proprietary "Kinematic Arfifact Detection." I believe Pulitzer has uncovered some helpful information, but I feel like the need to promote proprietary systems (over and over) generally hurts credibility. I wish these people would just present data in a straight-forward manner, with less push for marketing angles.
From another article.
Mike Lindell and Sheriff David Clarke asked us to run the Wisconsin voter rolls with our disruptive Fractal technology.
Fractal technology... ROFL.. o.k.. whatever the hell that is.
"Database latency" is an accurate and informative term. If a database is updated slowly, say once a month, the it won't pick up a change that is made and reverted over a week. From the article:
The election database isn't going to update the National change of address database.. Its the other way around.
Yes. The election database updates itself according to changes in the NCOA, but it does it too slowly to pick up changes rapidly made and reverted in order to cheat.
Cool. My point still stands. DB Latency is completely the wrong term to use and will get them laughed out of any future court. DB Latency is a specific reference to the speed at which a query will return results. This "Latency" is almost always measured on the order of milliseconds or less. Its affected by any number of things like storage performance, CPU, load on the DB etc. Updates coming in from other DBs / Applications is completely incorrect to call it DB Latency. Those are interfaces. And if they get updates yearly, its probably not even a formal interface, more like idiot DB Admin that has no business having a job just updates it manually whenever they get around to pulling the update from NCOA.
But the article is alleging the opposite--that the changes were made in the voting databases and changed back before the NCOA catches up. That the article got the way it works completely wrong is a huge red flag.
It'd be nice if we had an article that was written by someone who can write. This article is terrible.
Still need a large size army/force to over turn this fraudulent election.. they and their so called gov. titles in az are in power and no one can get them to give up their power and have a real election ... they got the guns and bigger mic ... you try they shoot you right after they label you a terrorist .. got mr. biden and jan/6 entrancement ?
Finding the evidence means nothing when the people that are responsible for doing something about it are the ones protecting the people that broke the law.
I hate to doom, but it will take 20-30 years to fix this the non-violent way maybe. Big MAYBE. You might as well be trying to remove salt from water.
This is tail chasing. “Bag guy democrats” We don’t need speculative articles generalizing identities. We need real people, real names, real happenings.
Is there any actual proof that this was done in Nevada or Arizona or Wisconsin?
Yes, they found proof.
So your going to show it to us?
I really want to believe, but the plausible deniability of such a claim is off the chart.
2 more weeks before we see this so called "proof".
Are they planning to share it with anyone?
Wasn’t this listed as a sticky already?
https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/16ZX3McIp1/heres-how-they-did-it-realtime-e/c/
Oh.. different website I guess
Yes, Hoft just republished the American Thinker article by Valentine with a ridiculous click bait title. Hate it when he does this; it's not helpful to sensationalize stuff, and there's no real evidence revealed by Valentine in the article.
I'm chasing down all these links and I'm seeing zero evidence or proof. What am I supposed to do with this?
Uh huh…
Before I read it, I'd be willing to bet it's nothing but a q larp by TGP.
Edit: it's just a repost, actual source: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/11/heres_how_they_did_it_realtime_election_fraud.html
Black pill, won't make any difference. GOP is complicit. There is no peaceful solution to this problem.
When you have more votes then citizens you got cheating. No more mail in ballots. If uou are caught cheating you go to the death chamber. Make it so horrific they dont try it.
This is the key. Do you remember when there was a fight to clean the voter rolls? Democrats fought harder than normal and it was from no where with their vitriol on the subject.
As it is common sense to get people of that don’t belong there and it should be done before any election, but it doesn’t happen. This is because they can use the dead, moved and whoever (phantoms) to vote in their scheme because no one can report that. Cleaning the voter rolls would cripple their cheating scheme.
The Democrats cheat on many fronts. Cleaning the voter rolls would hurt them, but this is a separate scam.
They get the names and voter records of an entire county (this is expensive, but they have lots of money) and they identify people who do not vote. They ensure the ballots due to those non-voters get sent to a pick-up address instead. The USPS colludes by returning the non-deliverable votes to the Democrats.
The Democrats learn on voting day how many votes they need to manufacture. They put a small team on the job of forging the votes. this takes a lot of time, because even 30 people are not going to forge over 200,000 votes overnight. This is why there were no down-ballot votes for Democrats on Biden votes in 2020 - too much work! Over the next few weeks, the forged votes are 'found' until they have reached a margin too great to trigger a recount.
Just email Time magazine, they'll be happy to boast about their methods.
Medical records have to have audit trails. Why not these databases?
Do it the good ol fashioned way and call the cops. Report the crime, turn over a copy of the evidence and hire a P.I. on top of it.
Yeah, but that way doesn't get anyone to send them money 😂
Before I invest the time....more hopium?
No judge will take up an election fraud case because they are worried about their precious career, more important than doing the right thing. God help us.
Now what I had to build a shed with all the evidence
until findings and truth coming out invalidates (even "certified") elections and removes the cheating leftists, I don't care. We know HOW they cheat, what we need is ACTION to invalidate elections done fraudulently, no statue of limitations on how long ago, complete removal of all officials installed, invalidate and remove any of their appointments, invalidate any EOs, laws passed under their reign and essentially make it like it never happened. Not just "hey we found the fraud, but removing this person from office over it because they've been certified and in office for 6 months, a year or more would be a "crisis"". no, complete tear down and do-over. That's what should happen with Biden, his entire admin to date should be torn apart and invalidated.
The Sherriff isn't coming, he works for Biden.
Strongly written statement coming from republicans anytime now.
Why sticky the fag pedo website when the actual article is down below?
And?
We blew the lid of Georgia and Arizona and nothing happened.
They opened their eyes?
we had a mountain of evidence of fraud in 2020 and nothing was done about it.
.......................will 2022 by any different? i dont fucking know, i hope so. truly but god dammit commies MUST DIE!
Does it mention anything about the machines which are programmed to kick in a weighted race feature once the un-wanted candidate gets to a certain percentage ahead? Does it mention that they can ditch as many votes as they want from one candidate to another? Does it mention how the machines can delete votes? Why is NO ONE talking about this?! It doesn’t matter how many ballots the traffic when we still have the fucking machines.
Probably because the people that did talk about it got their asses sued for millions of dollars. That elusive proof thing continues to evade them.
Because most of them are grifters and there isn't any.
2 more weeks and they'll do something this time!