Orwell was a member of the Fabian Society and clearly privy to its long-term goals. I do, however, think his works read more like a critique of the system than the Huxleys, who were clearly apologists for the global regime
Hexley was a part of the same old families that are involved in todays strife. He was not a prophet. he was not laying a blueprint or warning. All he provided was a promise of their goals.
I mentioned the Huxleys as apologists not prophets. The argument I was making was that Orwell and the likes of Huxley were not prophets, but privy to the telos of the NWO. It was clear when Aldous Huxley gave a talk at Berkeley to those dumb college students indicating Brave New World was not fiction. They clapped like retarded seals.Yes, the Huxley family was very much a part of the world order priesthood. TH Huxley was Darwin's bulldog and Julian Huxley repackaged eugenics under UNESCO
agreed. forgive me its become a habit to post that anytime I see his name mentioned these days because people are always going "what foresight he had" and, like you very succinctly put it, was absolutely not the case.
Yes, most definitely. I agree and also find that annoying when people say things about these authors being "prophetic". No, as you put, they were close to the scientific, technocratic think tanks and knew the goal
What Elizabeth Warren is actually saying is that Government "which is made up of many people" should be the ones to decide who gets censored and who does not instead of one CEO or Owner of a social media business. Which is the arrangement The Government Left had with Jack Dorsey. To people like Liz and her communist ilk, they think that is too much power in one persons hand. But if Elon and other social media owners follow the First amendment than there is no "Censor Power" being exercised.
Issue it as a warning for misrepresentation of her Native American heritage. Include background on her working at Harvard out of Rutgers which could only happen with AA points and submit some pictures of PowWowChow, her Native American cookbook.
No no. The government can be sued on 1st amendment grounds.
They want NGOs and corporations to be the censors because those cannot be sued or even questioned. They outsource censorship to circumvent the constitution.
Hadn’t heard from this retarded bitch in a while..she’s the perfect avatar for the shitty northeastern post-wall NIMBY. Boxes of wine and Percocet to keep them in a fluffy dream. Grasping their metal water bottle with their crypt keeper hands. She can’t hear your cries for rape and murder in Roxbury while she’s off in another state on our dime.
Frankly nobody should. Unless you've committed a crime that you can cite with written law, there should be no policing of content. Literal wild wild west on social media
That was the policy of pretty much every social media company prior to 2015. Then the establishment got scared and told the companies to stop people from saying things they don’t like.
Aaron Swartz the founder of RSS and creator of reddit committed suicide years ago. He was a political, free speech and access to information activist. He was very vocal about SOPA, he looked up to, and worked with Warren. The govt went after him, and the story is he killed himself. I just find it curious that Elizabeth is soooooooo interested in Elon and the access to online information… AGAIN. She’s a deceptive cunt and a fraud. If you haven’t seen the internet’s own boy, it’s a good watch: https://youtu.be/9vz06QO3UkQ
Indian whore said thats not how it should work, but 99% of the people on .WIN has been suspended from all other social media platforms. go dig a ditch Walking Eagle Whore
I mean, I agree with her but it's fucking annoying as hell that it was completely ok with her when some commies got to do it but now that someone turned the tables and is calling for "free speech" and doing what she is actually asking for, now she opens her stupid mouth? Fuckin annoying as hell really.
Too fricken funny tell that to the millions in Facebook jail!
That makes about as much sense as saying, "you wouldn't be in the stockade if you didn't try speaking in the public square."
Yet we’re all here on fedbook lol
Faggots.win
we make new accounts to circumvent bans, faggott
Sounds like an addiction
Yeah a pussy would relabel the 1st as an addiction.
make new pages! dodge bans!
How come she never had this to say when Jihad Jack and VaJayJay Gadde were running Twitter and catering to the swamp rats like her?
FUCK Liz Warren, she's one of the worst people in the world.
I used facebook to get with my high school sweetheart. Stopped after we were dating.
big dick energy in action
Stalker
and now, just like that, the leftist faggots worry about freedom of speech when they no longer control one platform.
But that's exactly how it was before Elon bought it
Doublethink seemed crazy decades ago ... but Orwell was on to something. The term needs to trend on twitter. #doublethink
They always pivot to freedom of speech when they aren't the censors.
This is what the "freedom of speech" movement in colleges in the 70s was about. Getting power.
When they are out of power, they are anarchists and when they are in power, they are statists.
Orwell was writing from experience and extrapolating to what happened if these fucks got real power.
And then they did.
Orwell was a member of the Fabian Society and clearly privy to its long-term goals. I do, however, think his works read more like a critique of the system than the Huxleys, who were clearly apologists for the global regime
Hexley was a part of the same old families that are involved in todays strife. He was not a prophet. he was not laying a blueprint or warning. All he provided was a promise of their goals.
I mentioned the Huxleys as apologists not prophets. The argument I was making was that Orwell and the likes of Huxley were not prophets, but privy to the telos of the NWO. It was clear when Aldous Huxley gave a talk at Berkeley to those dumb college students indicating Brave New World was not fiction. They clapped like retarded seals.Yes, the Huxley family was very much a part of the world order priesthood. TH Huxley was Darwin's bulldog and Julian Huxley repackaged eugenics under UNESCO
agreed. forgive me its become a habit to post that anytime I see his name mentioned these days because people are always going "what foresight he had" and, like you very succinctly put it, was absolutely not the case.
Yes, most definitely. I agree and also find that annoying when people say things about these authors being "prophetic". No, as you put, they were close to the scientific, technocratic think tanks and knew the goal
It's not hypocrisy, it's hierarchy.
Besides you'll notice she said "human being." She wants the demons deciding.
What Elizabeth Warren is actually saying is that Government "which is made up of many people" should be the ones to decide who gets censored and who does not instead of one CEO or Owner of a social media business. Which is the arrangement The Government Left had with Jack Dorsey. To people like Liz and her communist ilk, they think that is too much power in one persons hand. But if Elon and other social media owners follow the First amendment than there is no "Censor Power" being exercised.
Except it was done "by committee". Commies love 'em some committees.
Nuh uh...there were 5 people. 5 is better than 1 bigot
She Elon was doing just fine. Maybe she agrees?
"Should Jack and Parag be able to?"
"lol of course! Orange Man Bad!"
She's right. We've been saying that for years. When it was habbening to us, no one cared.
Hypocrisy is part of their religion. Well, that, and eating babies.
Its not hypocrisy, its power.
Nothing else matters.
It's both
Yeah but the hypocrisy is just a side effect of the main goal.
Hypocrisy is preaching or believing one thing and doing another.
These people don't believe in anything except power.
In order for it to be hypocritical, they'd need some kind of consistency but they do not. They switch whenever the reigns of power demand they switch.
Its worse than hypocrisy... Its far more sinister than that.
Absolutely
Well, what they don’t like is that it’s not happening to enough or the right people. Who on her side is getting banned?
They are (D)ifferent
this bitch is in a bubble
I wish it was a smaller bubble, with rapidly decreasing oxygen levels.
lol
stop i can only get so hard
Smoke bubble.
this bitch is a commie...they know exactly what they're doing...
“We like censorship but only if we’re the ones doing it” -Fauxcohontas
I think Elon Musk should, just for reasons, temp ban Elizabeth Warrens Twitter account for like a day.
Issue it as a warning for misrepresentation of her Native American heritage. Include background on her working at Harvard out of Rutgers which could only happen with AA points and submit some pictures of PowWowChow, her Native American cookbook.
She said she sat alone in the cafeteria as the only person of colour on faculty. She's a nut and a fraud.
Do it by "accident" like what happens to conservative accounts but never liberals.
Well; she's right and Elon should tell her that's why he let Trump and others back on.
How should it work, then? Who does she think gets to make that decision? The government?!
No no. The government can be sued on 1st amendment grounds.
They want NGOs and corporations to be the censors because those cannot be sued or even questioned. They outsource censorship to circumvent the constitution.
I call it laundering. Censorship laundering, mandate laundering, they've got a good system really.
This, exactly
A team of highly infiltratable trending-left individuals.
Hadn’t heard from this retarded bitch in a while..she’s the perfect avatar for the shitty northeastern post-wall NIMBY. Boxes of wine and Percocet to keep them in a fluffy dream. Grasping their metal water bottle with their crypt keeper hands. She can’t hear your cries for rape and murder in Roxbury while she’s off in another state on our dime.
Poetry.
But the government should?
Frankly nobody should. Unless you've committed a crime that you can cite with written law, there should be no policing of content. Literal wild wild west on social media
That's what I was thinking, like yes you are correct Pocahontas! Not one, not two, not n+1.
That was the policy of pretty much every social media company prior to 2015. Then the establishment got scared and told the companies to stop people from saying things they don’t like.
Elizabeth Warren is a fucking weasel
Looks like one, too.
Ah yes, because you want it to be a panel of ideological leftists like it was before, right Elizabeth?
I wish more people looked into her and Aaron Schwartz’s death.
Mind tl;dr-ing it for us?
Aaron Swartz the founder of RSS and creator of reddit committed suicide years ago. He was a political, free speech and access to information activist. He was very vocal about SOPA, he looked up to, and worked with Warren. The govt went after him, and the story is he killed himself. I just find it curious that Elizabeth is soooooooo interested in Elon and the access to online information… AGAIN. She’s a deceptive cunt and a fraud. If you haven’t seen the internet’s own boy, it’s a good watch: https://youtu.be/9vz06QO3UkQ
Hey Warren! If you don't like Twitter, build your own fire.
But I thought it was a private company and private companies didn't violate speech laws when they decide who can and cannot speak?
That's rich.
Sadly, Dem voters will agree with her and not see the hypocrisy.
Apple left the chat room
The funny thing is, he isnt even banning people..
Now they cant spew their bullshit because theyll actually be 'fact checked' by the community lmfao.
Indian whore said thats not how it should work, but 99% of the people on .WIN has been suspended from all other social media platforms. go dig a ditch Walking Eagle Whore
Yep she want 10k people of the same extreme political bent to make that decision!
HAHA
INDIAN NAME: SITTING CUNT
But. Chief LiestoYourFace had ZERO issues when a foreign nation SILENCED The President of the United States of America. Fuck off fauxchahontis.
Is this bitch literally retarded??
After the past few years of blatant Conservative censorship she has the balls to say this? Unfuckingbelievable.
Elon is not deciding who gets to speak, he is letting everybody speak, unless you are speaking about molesting children.
What happened to "MuH PrIvAtE EnTeRpRiSe"?
I mean, I agree with her but it's fucking annoying as hell that it was completely ok with her when some commies got to do it but now that someone turned the tables and is calling for "free speech" and doing what she is actually asking for, now she opens her stupid mouth? Fuckin annoying as hell really.
The Users have that Control through the "Follow" and "Block" mechanisms.
is there a word for something that goes beyond hypocrisy? no doubt these are the biggest hippocrites in the world at this moment in time
Funny, I didn't hear a peep out of fauxcahontas when conservatives were being censored/banned on Twitter in DROVES
Because it was "hate speech", duh
Holy shit, even a broken clock is right sometimes. It's too bad she wasn't saying this before, right?
Hey Lizzy Baby, its's a private corporation, REMEMBER?