Shortly before the AIDS epidemic began, promiscuous gay men in NYC and SF were recruited to participate in a clinical trial of a hepatitis vaccine. If HIV/AIDS is in fact a man-made disease, it may well have been introduced through voluntary "vaccinations."
It’s better! A native Washingtonian like me knows a lot about the Potomac. A tidal river with lots and lots of floating massive logs, and infested with poop from the endlessly malfunctioning Anacostia waste treatment plant, also it was so polluted in the 70’s that you couldn’t walk on its banks. A stinking festering body of water seems appropriate.
Similarly, the first cases of the 1918 flu pandemic were at Fort Riley, Kansas, where the Army had been injecting conscripts with an experimental meningitis vaccine. Those same conscripts would soon be sent to the trenches in Europe, and suddenly everyone was getting sick.
That one could have been accidental as well. But once something is made the evil sink their teeth into it. And creating a virus to ravage a population or army is something I would not put past our enemies (especially domestic)
While that may be true the 1918 flu came from China and was brought over by Chinese workers imported while all our men were being drafted and Fort Riley got sick as soon as chinese workers entered the base working on that part of the train line. So its 1 of many possibilities as to were it actually came from.
US called it spanish because of hostilities with spain UK called it the German flu Germany called it Russian pox etc... at the time noone knew were it came from.
The U.S. is the seat of the Globalist empire (as much as we the people wish they would go anywhere else), so it would not suprise me if it funded the development of a shoddy bioweapon to force globalism on the massess.
I read it was called the Spanish Flu because at the time of WWI they were neutral and the only one who's' newspapers/journalists were printing actual news and not propaganda, so when they reported the flu the rest of the world believed them and referred to it as the Spanish flu since that is who credibly reported it first in that country. (even though it was raging across the European Continent by that time).
Not sure if that's true, just what I read in an article on the topic.
Possibly. And, it doesn’t mean they wanted to take out gay men, it’s that they didn’t give a crap either way. They just asked themselves “If we infect certain people with this, who can we be sure will infect others very quickly?” The obvious answer “gay men”
Yeah, in reality they have to take a slew of pills and antibiotics every day.
I heard the same crap about Leprosy a few years ago when I lived in Southern California. Some illegal Mexican siblings started attending a CA elementary school, and it was soon found they had leprosy. The kids were then removed from school, but parents were really concerned, so the school sent out a notice about it (which I saw on a community Facebook page. They basically said “No cause for concern, leprosy is treatable with medication. It’s fine”
I looked up the treatment, and posted it on the FB thread. It’s “treatable” by taking about 30 pills a day, including several types of antibiotic, for 2-4 years straight! The treatment is barely survivable, because all those antibiotics are hell on your system, they will cause chronic diarrhea, which easily turns to sepsis and kills you. There’s a reason certain diseases have a really bad rap.
I was reading about whether armadillos were tasty or not and it turns out they have a higher chance of carrying leprosy because their body heat is so low.
My supervisor listens to the Glenn Beck show on the radio every day and one of the commercials that gets played every 10 minutes is about HIV meds that "reduces it to the point where it doesn't even show up on a test"... doesn't say anything about eliminating side effects or reducing your chance of infecting others, just make it so you won't test positive anymore.
According to a commercial I have seen (I think it's the Roku channel that loves this commercial) if they are undectable they can't spread it. Seems pretty risky to me but that seems to be the info out there.
And it doesn't effect me so I haven't bothered looking further.
Check out the book "The River: A Journey Back to the Source of HIV and AIDS" by Edward Hooper. He was a victim of cancel culture after writing this incredible book because it implicates a contaminated vaccine. Surprise, it involves American biolabs in foreign lands (Africa).
Kinda like they're making permanent customers to big pharma. Yearly flu shots, 6 covid boosters per year, meds for trans kids for life, hiv/aids meds for life, "uncurable" diseases = customers for life.
Tuskegee, Willowbrook hospital (government testing on children with autism who were unwitting participants and forced to do terrible things such as drink milk with fecal matter in it in order to be infected for testing), MK ultra, operation paper clip.
The government views the populace as their test subjects.
To clarify, Marxists would say because of systemic oppression (esp in this specific case), they have justified reason to not trust Big Brother, thus will get a waiver.
It doesn't make sense because the jab isn't targeting them and the lie itself can and should cause anyone not to trust BB.
The CDC is a glorified vaccine sales company at this point.
Don’t trust them in the slightest. Sadly, the Tuskegee debacle pales in comparison to the Scamdemic and everything that has happened in the last several years.
The Tuskegee participants were promised free rides to and from the clinic and free hot meals. I know several organizations in present day offered free rides for covid jabs, and who doesn’t forget free doughnuts or ice cream or other free food offered if you could prove you got the jab.
Tuskegee and Guatemalan experiments are often conflated.
With the Tuskegee experiments they were not given Syphilis (they were not told they have it and then the Syphilis progression was studied until it killed them)
Guatemalan was when they were deliberately injected.
too many people 'just know' what is not true. the men were not injected with syphilis. they contracted syphilis on their own. the doctors diagnosed them but withheld that information from them. and the 'study' was to see what happened over the years as the syphilis killed them
it doesn't make it any better, but we should be interested in the truth, not what 'everyone knows'
The thing that makes it particularly heinous though, is that a cure for the disease came out shortly after the experiment started: antibiotics. Of course, they debated on whether to end the experiment and give the men the medicine they needed, but decided that letting them die like test animals was the better option "because science."
Penicillin was discovered in 1928. The study ran from 1932-1972. The argument is that penicillin wasn’t used for syphilis until the early 1940’s. And it didn’t become widely available until after WWII. But that doesn’t explain why the study went on until 1972.
The experiment was under the guise of treating syphilis. In order to volunteer for the free government treatment test, you had to go in to the test having syphilis. Of course, they weren't actually treating the syphilis because they wanted to test the long term effects of untreated syphilis.
I thought they were told they were being treated for syphilis but the "medicine" was a placebo. They wanted to study the disease on the populace while they were under the impression they were being helped.
This is how the re-write history....the history you think you know.....or many things in history are fake news.....note that it wasn't just the CDC but all the doctors involved too.....I say malpractice......and all those who made people get the death vax as a condition of employment is practicing medicine without a license.....
There's a debate as to whether they where given syphilis, or were diagnosed and not told or treated, so the doctors could study the effects. Just about as bad, in my opinion.
My understanding is all the men were offered a free screening with a doctor for the first time in their rural lives, and the ones who had syphilis were then provided lifetime medical care with the caveat that they only ever see the "doctors" running the experiment. And it's in that way they were never told of their disease by actual doctors.
To me the worst part of this is antibiotics were invented shortly after this experiment started. A cure was evident and readily available, yet the "experts" chose to withhold that and let the patients die anyway "because science." Totally disgusting and unethical. It's basically murder.
Pretty fucked up shit. They could have been cured, but then the demon worshippers wouldn't have gotten a good look at what a perfectly curable disease does to the bodies of their pets.
The study was about “latent syphillis” ie those who did not have symptoms. There was a debate whether treating latent symphilis could do more harm than good, and whether latent syphilis posed any health effects. Subjects who became symptomatic were removed from the study. It was endorsed and studied by numerous all black health groups and most of the doctors were black. They all believed what they were doing was in the best interests of their patients and the black population.
Here’s an article from the lancet in 2005 when journals used to actually report the truth. I’m sure everybody involved would be fired well before this could be published if it were attempted today
Seems that your watering down the implications even more. From what I have read , they still were not told that they had it in any form, hence the choice of treatment was taken out the patient's hands. I also think that the doctors being black has little to no bearing on this issue.
All the doctors believed what they were doing was in the best interests of the patients and the black population as a whole. That’s pretty much the crux of the issue and any other details are secondary considerations
When the publication that ran cover for the entire fake pandemic (dispelling misinformation about vaccines and HCQ) titles and article with "Clearing the myths of time: Tuskegee revisited" you probably should be a little suspicious.
The point is the subjects were not informed they had Syphilis. All that article does is massage what happened.
If you call it a study it makes it harmless I guess. I wonder if the government called it a study when they subjected military personnel to nuclear fallout in the desert years back.
In my younger, naive days, I fully believed that the Tuskegee experiments were a crock of shit. How could the AMERICAN government do that to its people?
Fast forward many years later, and I've realized that it was just one single instance in a YUGE list of fucked up shit the US government "conspiracies"...and as the days go on, it becomes more and more obvious that "conspiracy" is just another word for factual happenings.
Fuck the CDC/WHO when Ebola was spreading in Africa the Gate Foundation was experimenting with vaccines and sterilized half the continent. There is nothing ethical about these demons.
Soooo when does this commitment to ethical research and practice take effect, exactly? Was it evident in the coercion and threats towards those who refused the covid vax, or anti vaxxers in general? Doesn’t appear so 🤔
They were studying Syphilis, then DARPA probably created Lyme disease using that knowledge since they are both spiral bacteria that are hard to cure. Possibly a first generation bioweapon, before CRISPR, at a time when gene splicing bacteria was cutting edge.
Shortly before the AIDS epidemic began, promiscuous gay men in NYC and SF were recruited to participate in a clinical trial of a hepatitis vaccine. If HIV/AIDS is in fact a man-made disease, it may well have been introduced through voluntary "vaccinations."
Under the watchful eye of FAUXI....
Throw the elf in the potomac
Potomac.......is that a type of elevator shaft?
I think it's a brand of industrial wood chipper.
It was. Most of the remaining ones are old and rusty. Prone to breaking down mid “chip”
Two weeks to remove you from the chipper. Vax helps with clotting, thats a bonus!
Two weeks to slow the spread tell him its for his own good we leave him there with the hungry cridders
It’s better! A native Washingtonian like me knows a lot about the Potomac. A tidal river with lots and lots of floating massive logs, and infested with poop from the endlessly malfunctioning Anacostia waste treatment plant, also it was so polluted in the 70’s that you couldn’t walk on its banks. A stinking festering body of water seems appropriate.
The Potomac feels the same way about DC. Full of sludge, dead wood, festering shit.
Paging Vlad the Impaler.
Yup, he was watching the gay sex alright…
((())) “watching”
Similarly, the first cases of the 1918 flu pandemic were at Fort Riley, Kansas, where the Army had been injecting conscripts with an experimental meningitis vaccine. Those same conscripts would soon be sent to the trenches in Europe, and suddenly everyone was getting sick.
This doesn't get talked about nearly as often as it should.
"Our own" front lines mean something different to globalists
That one could have been accidental as well. But once something is made the evil sink their teeth into it. And creating a virus to ravage a population or army is something I would not put past our enemies (especially domestic)
It was an accident. Just like China flu
While that may be true the 1918 flu came from China and was brought over by Chinese workers imported while all our men were being drafted and Fort Riley got sick as soon as chinese workers entered the base working on that part of the train line. So its 1 of many possibilities as to were it actually came from.
US called it spanish because of hostilities with spain UK called it the German flu Germany called it Russian pox etc... at the time noone knew were it came from.
The U.S. is the seat of the Globalist empire (as much as we the people wish they would go anywhere else), so it would not suprise me if it funded the development of a shoddy bioweapon to force globalism on the massess.
I read it was called the Spanish Flu because at the time of WWI they were neutral and the only one who's' newspapers/journalists were printing actual news and not propaganda, so when they reported the flu the rest of the world believed them and referred to it as the Spanish flu since that is who credibly reported it first in that country. (even though it was raging across the European Continent by that time).
Not sure if that's true, just what I read in an article on the topic.
https://tubitv.com/movies/672129/shots-eugenics-to-pandemics?start=true%C2%A0
Spread far and wide. With no masks. ;)
I never knew that. Learn something new every day. Thanks-
Possibly. And, it doesn’t mean they wanted to take out gay men, it’s that they didn’t give a crap either way. They just asked themselves “If we infect certain people with this, who can we be sure will infect others very quickly?” The obvious answer “gay men”
Sounds about right. Now they keep pushing HIV meds that "make it a livable condition" as if contracting it isn't an issue.
Yeah, in reality they have to take a slew of pills and antibiotics every day.
I heard the same crap about Leprosy a few years ago when I lived in Southern California. Some illegal Mexican siblings started attending a CA elementary school, and it was soon found they had leprosy. The kids were then removed from school, but parents were really concerned, so the school sent out a notice about it (which I saw on a community Facebook page. They basically said “No cause for concern, leprosy is treatable with medication. It’s fine”
I looked up the treatment, and posted it on the FB thread. It’s “treatable” by taking about 30 pills a day, including several types of antibiotic, for 2-4 years straight! The treatment is barely survivable, because all those antibiotics are hell on your system, they will cause chronic diarrhea, which easily turns to sepsis and kills you. There’s a reason certain diseases have a really bad rap.
I was reading about whether armadillos were tasty or not and it turns out they have a higher chance of carrying leprosy because their body heat is so low.
Armadillos are often eaten in Mexico.
Interesting. So, higher chance of illegals bringing leprosy.
My supervisor listens to the Glenn Beck show on the radio every day and one of the commercials that gets played every 10 minutes is about HIV meds that "reduces it to the point where it doesn't even show up on a test"... doesn't say anything about eliminating side effects or reducing your chance of infecting others, just make it so you won't test positive anymore.
I knew Glenn Beck listeners were fags
According to a commercial I have seen (I think it's the Roku channel that loves this commercial) if they are undectable they can't spread it. Seems pretty risky to me but that seems to be the info out there.
And it doesn't effect me so I haven't bothered looking further.
Yeah, and pharma companies said the clot shots were 'safe and effective'.
Like I said, seems pretty risky.
And PrEP so they don't use condoms with their 50+ new sex partners every year
Gay men are obvious infection vectors. They stick their dicks in everything.
they do tend to spread it far and wide
The truth of gay male sexual behavior is not widely known, it seems to me. If it were, those people would be viewed as walking talking Typhoid Marys.
I'm just talking about your regular "garden variety" fag.
I think most gay dudes have had about 500 dicks in them. It's insane.
Over a weekend, yeah. Over a lifetime? Probably tens of thousands tbh
Seems like it used to be and they were treated appropriately.
Also true, probably. Updoot.
We do not give our predecessors/ancestors enough credit. Pretty much in all ways.
Our ancestors were right about almost everything.
Check out the book "The River: A Journey Back to the Source of HIV and AIDS" by Edward Hooper. He was a victim of cancel culture after writing this incredible book because it implicates a contaminated vaccine. Surprise, it involves American biolabs in foreign lands (Africa).
Kinda like they're making permanent customers to big pharma. Yearly flu shots, 6 covid boosters per year, meds for trans kids for life, hiv/aids meds for life, "uncurable" diseases = customers for life.
Tuskegee, Willowbrook hospital (government testing on children with autism who were unwitting participants and forced to do terrible things such as drink milk with fecal matter in it in order to be infected for testing), MK ultra, operation paper clip.
The government views the populace as their test subjects.
Speaking of testing on children
Fauci testing on foster children AIDS memorial https://patriots.win/p/140vR0UNvQ/forgotten-monument-to-dead-orpha/c/
Wow!! I knew about the dogs. That was evil enough. I had no idea about the kids. I'm guessing most others don't either.
This is the first time I heard about this
And the Anthrax vax experiment on the troops (that disabled/killed many) was partly done to find life extension for the elite.
I remember when Killary apologized to Guatemala for the US running similar experiments (torturous genocide) there.
I’m not aware of those experiments, but not surprised to hear about it.
I trust the government with my health as far as I can throw it.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/leahrosenbaum/2020/06/12/willowbrook-scandal-hepatitis-experiments-hideous-truths-of-testing-vaccines-on-humans/?sh=53bac103279c
1955 - 1970, experiments ran by Saul Krugman.
Don't forget the time they fed radioactive oatmeal to poor kids just to see what would happen.
Fingers crossed for a superhero?
Or those times they injected people with highly radioactive material, just for the fuck of it I guess?
I’m not aware of this. Anything you can link me to to learn more?
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/spoonful-sugar-helps-radioactive-oatmeal-go-down-180962424/
There's an episode of the Dangerous History Podcast about it, but I can't seem to find it.
Here's an informative list for your viewing pleasure...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States
I link this endlessly on sites. Like, all the time.
Ditto
Talk to blacks taking the covid vaccine on why they should trust the government now vs then and you'll be very disappointed.
Surprised blacks aren't given broad waiver for mandated jab. Not saying it makes sense, I'm just surprised.
To clarify, Marxists would say because of systemic oppression (esp in this specific case), they have justified reason to not trust Big Brother, thus will get a waiver.
It doesn't make sense because the jab isn't targeting them and the lie itself can and should cause anyone not to trust BB.
Welcome to the club
Also explained why some black people were so resistant to taking the COVID "vax."
Funny how "anti-racist" liberals always forget systemic racism requires the government to be involved, not their Trump-voting neighbor.
And of course, the pro-slavery and KKK-founding Democrat party is never mentioned and inherently exempt for some reason.
BecAuSe thE pARtiES swITchED you bigot!!!!!!!!!!!!
"The parties switched!"
Meanwhile, Democrats who were literally members of the KKK still held office as Democrats as recently as 2010 when Robert Byrd died.
But it's okay, because he was like a reformed KKK member or something...
Don’t hurt them with facts you racist.
Dont forget atlanta hasnt had a republican mayor since 1879, new orleans since 1872, charleston since 1877, chicago since 1933, detroit since 1962.
So many switchereenos.
Interesting facts, thx for the share!
Bravo
The CDC is a glorified vaccine sales company at this point.
Don’t trust them in the slightest. Sadly, the Tuskegee debacle pales in comparison to the Scamdemic and everything that has happened in the last several years.
Lots of parallels too.
The Tuskegee participants were promised free rides to and from the clinic and free hot meals. I know several organizations in present day offered free rides for covid jabs, and who doesn’t forget free doughnuts or ice cream or other free food offered if you could prove you got the jab.
Tuskegee and Guatemalan experiments are often conflated.
With the Tuskegee experiments they were not given Syphilis (they were not told they have it and then the Syphilis progression was studied until it killed them)
Guatemalan was when they were deliberately injected.
came here for this
too many people 'just know' what is not true. the men were not injected with syphilis. they contracted syphilis on their own. the doctors diagnosed them but withheld that information from them. and the 'study' was to see what happened over the years as the syphilis killed them
it doesn't make it any better, but we should be interested in the truth, not what 'everyone knows'
The thing that makes it particularly heinous though, is that a cure for the disease came out shortly after the experiment started: antibiotics. Of course, they debated on whether to end the experiment and give the men the medicine they needed, but decided that letting them die like test animals was the better option "because science."
Penicillin was discovered in 1928. The study ran from 1932-1972. The argument is that penicillin wasn’t used for syphilis until the early 1940’s. And it didn’t become widely available until after WWII. But that doesn’t explain why the study went on until 1972.
To be devil's advocate, maybe by the time penicillin was a common treatment the test subject's syphilis was too far progressed for it to be used.
Point still stands that they made no “sacrifice” because they were not willing participants.
How do you know they weren’t infected deliberately? The same man oversaw both sets of experiments.
The experiment was under the guise of treating syphilis. In order to volunteer for the free government treatment test, you had to go in to the test having syphilis. Of course, they weren't actually treating the syphilis because they wanted to test the long term effects of untreated syphilis.
They were also actively prevented from being treated since program nurses told doctors in surrounding communities not to treat them.
I don’t know why people don’t know this. It’s just stupid at this point. And they never mention Guatemala, which was even worse.
I thought they were told they were being treated for syphilis but the "medicine" was a placebo. They wanted to study the disease on the populace while they were under the impression they were being helped.
This is how the re-write history....the history you think you know.....or many things in history are fake news.....note that it wasn't just the CDC but all the doctors involved too.....I say malpractice......and all those who made people get the death vax as a condition of employment is practicing medicine without a license.....
Your last point is so important and always overlooked. Media, Socialites, Hollywierdos, etc who said to get the jab were not a licensed doctor.
Bah Pharma sez take the needles, ya Fuking sheep.🤨
There's a debate as to whether they where given syphilis, or were diagnosed and not told or treated, so the doctors could study the effects. Just about as bad, in my opinion.
My understanding is all the men were offered a free screening with a doctor for the first time in their rural lives, and the ones who had syphilis were then provided lifetime medical care with the caveat that they only ever see the "doctors" running the experiment. And it's in that way they were never told of their disease by actual doctors.
To me the worst part of this is antibiotics were invented shortly after this experiment started. A cure was evident and readily available, yet the "experts" chose to withhold that and let the patients die anyway "because science." Totally disgusting and unethical. It's basically murder.
The 'study'went from the late 30's until the early 70's.
Coulda treated 100% by midway through.
That's what I have read. That's why when people say that they were given syphilis it tends to muddy the waters.
Those people are confusing it with another hideously unethical syphilis experiment the US government carried out.
https://www.britannica.com/event/Guatemala-syphilis-experiment
Pretty fucked up shit. They could have been cured, but then the demon worshippers wouldn't have gotten a good look at what a perfectly curable disease does to the bodies of their pets.
They've done far worse, too.
The study was about “latent syphillis” ie those who did not have symptoms. There was a debate whether treating latent symphilis could do more harm than good, and whether latent syphilis posed any health effects. Subjects who became symptomatic were removed from the study. It was endorsed and studied by numerous all black health groups and most of the doctors were black. They all believed what they were doing was in the best interests of their patients and the black population.
Here’s an article from the lancet in 2005 when journals used to actually report the truth. I’m sure everybody involved would be fired well before this could be published if it were attempted today
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(05)01286-7/fulltext
Seems that your watering down the implications even more. From what I have read , they still were not told that they had it in any form, hence the choice of treatment was taken out the patient's hands. I also think that the doctors being black has little to no bearing on this issue.
All the doctors believed what they were doing was in the best interests of the patients and the black population as a whole. That’s pretty much the crux of the issue and any other details are secondary considerations
When the publication that ran cover for the entire fake pandemic (dispelling misinformation about vaccines and HCQ) titles and article with "Clearing the myths of time: Tuskegee revisited" you probably should be a little suspicious.
The point is the subjects were not informed they had Syphilis. All that article does is massage what happened.
Either way its monstrous.
There isn't a debate about it. It's just wrong that they were deliberately injected.
That was the Guatemalan experiments.
With Tuskegee they just withheld the information from the patients that they had it and observed the progression of the disease until it killed them.
If you call it a study it makes it harmless I guess. I wonder if the government called it a study when they subjected military personnel to nuclear fallout in the desert years back.
Ve ville saw open your skull und poke ze brain to study your reactionz. Ok? Ve begin!
In my younger, naive days, I fully believed that the Tuskegee experiments were a crock of shit. How could the AMERICAN government do that to its people?
Fast forward many years later, and I've realized that it was just one single instance in a YUGE list of fucked up shit the US government "conspiracies"...and as the days go on, it becomes more and more obvious that "conspiracy" is just another word for factual happenings.
Truth is, the American Government that you felt patriotic for has been dead for centuries.
Something else now crawls about wearing its skin.
I would say that it has ebbed and flowed over the last handful of decades. But now it's just ebbing. I think the 60's were the big turning point.
Not only that.... this "sacrifice" went on for FORTY YEARS....
(((Walensky)))
She looks more "Palestinian"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochelle_Walensky#Personal_life
Quite the tan for a Jewish woman.
Cdc Director skin color change meme https://patriots.win/p/15JnG2DePF/
Cdc lady turns black, tells people to double inoculate kids with the two for one covid influenza shot https://communities.win/c/NoNewNormal/p/15JnG14hFu
**trust the science
Its the 50 year anniversary of the US government giving free Healthcare to black communities.
Even leftist Wikipedia says it was secret.
Look at the schnozz on that goblin!!!
I just can't unsee the elfs anymore. How have I not seen it my whole life?
Fuck the CDC/WHO when Ebola was spreading in Africa the Gate Foundation was experimenting with vaccines and sterilized half the continent. There is nothing ethical about these demons.
And they’re still murdering people
Soooo when does this commitment to ethical research and practice take effect, exactly? Was it evident in the coercion and threats towards those who refused the covid vax, or anti vaxxers in general? Doesn’t appear so 🤔
Almost got on Twitter to suggest the CDC pay them reparations, then realized we’d end up paying them anyway.
Who went to jail?
Democrats are just terrible people.
Rafał Gan-Ganowicz enters the conversation
They were studying Syphilis, then DARPA probably created Lyme disease using that knowledge since they are both spiral bacteria that are hard to cure. Possibly a first generation bioweapon, before CRISPR, at a time when gene splicing bacteria was cutting edge.
Center for Diseasing You
weird how the sheep never "cancel culture" CDC over it.
Kinda like they're being manipulated into who to cancel
Oh, look! Queen Degenerate speaks again.
IIRC They weren't given syphilis, they already had syphilis. The problem is they withheld the cure when it was later avilable
Ok, that makes sense, Guatemalans matter less
Lol I was just kidding, I just thought it would be/look funnier stated alone.
Always remember that the Tuskegee study was done by Progressives
The absolute nerve of this despicably murderous asshole, I hope she goes and gets another booster or three just to mark the occasion.
I knew this guy was going to be pretty cool some day after I saw Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo.
When these rich, out of touch, limousine liberals have to face God in 30 years, we might have justice.