We're facing an ideological war that represents the biggest threat to our country in my lifetime. This won't be fought in a short time frame. To avoid burnout, it helps to understand this is gonna be a grueling marathon. One of their goals is to keep us all demoralized, so we give up, and shut up.
So when people tell me "but nobody heard it because it's not on MSM," I think we should ask them, "Okay. How many people did you share it with?"
I'm not defined by the MSM. I know who they are, and I reject their narrative.
I was thinking more about the core values that we're arguing over. I know people who look at what their own kids think about the world, and wonder how their viewpoints are so different from their parents. (Hint: college is often involved.)
Issues like personal responsibility, the importance of faith, and the importance of many of our personal freedoms, like free speech.
Can we define those core values? Because that needs to be part of the conversation.
To me, understanding that this nation was founded to protect Individual Liberty, first and foremost, needs to be at the crux of the conversation. The good of the many cannot supersede the rights of any single person. The ends do not justify the means.
I wrote an article on this earlier in the week (will be in a Christian online newspaper).
It was about what the "Founding Proposition" really was.
The Founders would say it was Individual Liberty. There are others who came later who would say the Founding Proposition is "All men are created equal".
Because "equal" can be defined however they say, this interpretation allows for the State to twist itself in order to accomplish its ambiguous goals. The ends justify the means.
Only in a system where Individual Liberty is ALWAYS prevalent can there be justice.
It needs to be redefined and hammered into everyone's collective skulls.
Yes, thank you War, that's a critical understanding.
I also hate the pushed narrative that this nation was founded to protect a racist, immoral patriarchy. Too many kids are taught to be ashamed of being Americans, from an early age. Depriving them of understanding the exceptional character of our country opens the door to all kinds of self-destructive self-loathing later on in their lives. I think it starts them down the path to being lost, and it hurts my heart.
This nation was founded as a bastion of freedom AGAINST THE ROMAN PAPACY, who previously had the whole world in bondage and the DARK AGES because they kept the WORS from the people. Once the word got out the reformation happened and then America was formed, using the government given to us by Wycliffe, THE SAME GIY WHO GAVE US THE BIBLE! The same guy the rcc dug up and burned his bones, and the kicker to all of this it’s all recorded in Revelation 10-12!
The internet/social media is also often involved. I have an online friend from 2004 who used to be conservative, but in the last few years turned into a communist because reddit convinced him Marx is good.
The H1Bs are the ones doing the most damage. The domestic malcontents lack the ability and drive to accomplish much beyond burning down a few buildings. This is useful to strike fear into the judiciary, but the h1bs have hate in their heart and revenge fantasies of destroying western civilization for the crime of being better than eastern civilization.
They are also the most talented and driven members of societies with over a billion people
WBBM Chicago Headline "news" as of a few minutes ago, Twitter has more hate speech since Elon took over. Nothing else about Twitter. The enemy is very upset.
I'm more curious of who the Republicans were that asked for delete/banning in Trumps admin. I wouldn't be surprised if it was bill barr etc also asking for conservatives to be banned.
Lance Wallnau on RAV was talking this morning about how the trending topics on Twitter shape what journalists and influencers choose to write about. It won't be a fast change, but if conservatives can air their thoughts on the Twitter public square, it's likely to have an impact, over time.
They're talking about Catherine, Princess of Wales. She is the one married to Diana's son William, Prince of Wales, and she wore one of Diana's favorite pieces of jewelry last night (an emerald-and diamond choker)
The prince & princess were both at the Earthshot Prize thing in Boston last night. Earthshot is largely sponsored by the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation, so there's that.
(Then-CEO Jack Dorsey – whom Taibbi said was not involved in the decision – has told US lawmakers that in hindsight, suppressing the story was a mistake.)
The emails Taibbi obtained are consistent with what former Twitter site integrity head Yoel Roth told journalist Kara Swisher in an onstage interview earlier this week. During that interview, Roth said he felt at the time that the Post reporting bore the hallmarks of a Russian hack-and-leak operation, an assessment that was shared at the time by dozens of former US intelligence officials. Roth did not respond to CNN’s request for comment
Taibbi said in his series of tweets that “there is no evidence - that I’ve seen - of any government involvement in the laptop story.”
Taibbi said the contact from political parties happened more frequently from Democrats, but provided no internal documents to back up his assertion. He also did not say that Democrats requested that Twitter suppress the Post story, and his account did not suggest that the US government had ever pressured Twitter to suppress the story.
CNN: Released Twitter emails show how employees debated how to handle 2020 New York Post Hunter Biden story
Sanitized headline.
The emails Taibbi obtained are consistent with what former Twitter site integrity head Yoel Roth told journalist Kara Swisher in an onstage interview earlier this week.
More sanitizing. Nothing nefarious here.....it was all made public by Twitter, see?
During that interview, Roth said he felt at the time that the Post reporting bore the hallmarks of a Russian hack-and-leak operation, an assessment that was shared at the time by dozens of former US intelligence officials.
None of this matters. It's about suppressing the reporting of the laptop. Journalists are explicitly protected when disseminating information, so long as they, themselves, didn't do anything illegal to attain it. Journalists have shared stolen info many, many times (e.g. Snowden)
Taibbi said in his series of tweets that “there is no evidence - that I’ve seen - of any government involvement in the laptop story.”
Gaslighting . The drop is about Twitter bias moreso that Government involvement. Also, the Biden Campaign was not Government and they made requests. Again...gaslighting.
Taibbi said the contact from political parties happened more frequently from Democrats, but provided no internal documents to back up his assertion
The numerous images of emails to this effect aren't proof? Sure thing, CNN.
When used to watch it years ago, local news stations had tip hotlines where viewers could call with news leads. Maybe it would spur on some reporters if patriots would call their local station under the guise of a normie, with the “tip” that they wanted the news station to investigate what Musk has been releasing on Twitter.
If enough people called in, the station might cave to their viewership’s interest to do a story. Once local news might start covering it, perhaps the national ones might feel obligated to follow.
That's why I'm hopeful that they are doing the Project Veritas approach. Drop a little to allow the the perpetrators to respond, then unload the good stuff. Catch them in bigger lies. Monday might be interesting
Fox had a top story on it for a while last night. I believe the story was about there being only one Democrat who originally questioned that the laptop story should be looked at. But don’t hold me to those details. At the same time I went to CNN and MSNBC. Nothing. In fact, the lead story on CNN was about the closing arguments in the Trump org. Trial. When I checked elsewhere on Fox online, they not only had the lead story for a while, they also had about 2-3 other related stories about it. I know Tucker and Laura Ingraham also devoted time to it. This is really the best scenario. Fox absolutely has issues, but these were good stories, and since Fox is absolutely crushing the other MSM in viewership with a huge ratings increase this year, I’m hoping that any liberals who view this will spread the word. I’ll take anything at this point.
Like it or loath it, the UK’s Daily Mail has been on this more than any other mainstream news site. Sixth biggest online news site in the world, apparently.
For fun I went on Canadian news websites. ZERO coverage. Then I decided to Google. What did I find? 3 articles from leftists rags shitting on the release. The Rolling Stones said it was a "snoozefest"
They can have their bubble of delusion and fake news. I haven't been a part of it in twenty years. I have noticed that reality is slowly getting spread to a larger audience. I don't feel quite so isolated these days.
If free speech can have a true renaissance, maybe things will get better. I am not too encouraged though. As long as there is a two-tiered justice system, the deep state will just be slightly annoyed by the whole affair.
It takes them a couple of days to come up with a narrative, but don’t worry, as soon as they do they’ll all be parroting it. It’ll probably involve some specific word that they can all repeat.
We're facing an ideological war that represents the biggest threat to our country in my lifetime. This won't be fought in a short time frame. To avoid burnout, it helps to understand this is gonna be a grueling marathon. One of their goals is to keep us all demoralized, so we give up, and shut up.
So when people tell me "but nobody heard it because it's not on MSM," I think we should ask them, "Okay. How many people did you share it with?"
I'm not defined by the MSM. I know who they are, and I reject their narrative.
Waged by H1-Bs
Pretty sure it's just old fashioned war
I was thinking more about the core values that we're arguing over. I know people who look at what their own kids think about the world, and wonder how their viewpoints are so different from their parents. (Hint: college is often involved.)
Issues like personal responsibility, the importance of faith, and the importance of many of our personal freedoms, like free speech.
Can we define those core values? Because that needs to be part of the conversation.
To me, understanding that this nation was founded to protect Individual Liberty, first and foremost, needs to be at the crux of the conversation. The good of the many cannot supersede the rights of any single person. The ends do not justify the means.
Pretty sure the founders did a great job of that already.
I wrote an article on this earlier in the week (will be in a Christian online newspaper).
It was about what the "Founding Proposition" really was.
The Founders would say it was Individual Liberty. There are others who came later who would say the Founding Proposition is "All men are created equal".
Because "equal" can be defined however they say, this interpretation allows for the State to twist itself in order to accomplish its ambiguous goals. The ends justify the means.
Only in a system where Individual Liberty is ALWAYS prevalent can there be justice.
It needs to be redefined and hammered into everyone's collective skulls.
Equal - under the law. The intent was clear.
And yet, that intent has been distorted pretty much since 1861.
That distortion has been used to deem Central Government encroachment onto State powers as justifiable.
Can you link to it, when it's published? Or PM me, so I can? I'd like to read it, and I'm sure others would also.
Will do.
Yes, thank you War, that's a critical understanding.
I also hate the pushed narrative that this nation was founded to protect a racist, immoral patriarchy. Too many kids are taught to be ashamed of being Americans, from an early age. Depriving them of understanding the exceptional character of our country opens the door to all kinds of self-destructive self-loathing later on in their lives. I think it starts them down the path to being lost, and it hurts my heart.
TLDR: pride of country.
There was a whole episode (and overall underlying theme with the Vulcan culture) in Star Trek (original) on just this. I love old Star Trek.
Higher taxes on the middle class and small businesses would be a great start.
This nation was founded as a bastion of freedom AGAINST THE ROMAN PAPACY, who previously had the whole world in bondage and the DARK AGES because they kept the WORS from the people. Once the word got out the reformation happened and then America was formed, using the government given to us by Wycliffe, THE SAME GIY WHO GAVE US THE BIBLE! The same guy the rcc dug up and burned his bones, and the kicker to all of this it’s all recorded in Revelation 10-12!
The internet/social media is also often involved. I have an online friend from 2004 who used to be conservative, but in the last few years turned into a communist because reddit convinced him Marx is good.
Indians coming into our country and making rulings on what speech is allowed and what isn't. Civic nationalism is a mistake.
It was never a mistake, it was always intentional. If you want to know who is intentionally attacking the Western world, buy Mel Gibson a drink.
H1Bs are the least of your problems. Are you living under a rock? Look at the people your own country is producing.
The H1Bs are the ones doing the most damage. The domestic malcontents lack the ability and drive to accomplish much beyond burning down a few buildings. This is useful to strike fear into the judiciary, but the h1bs have hate in their heart and revenge fantasies of destroying western civilization for the crime of being better than eastern civilization.
They are also the most talented and driven members of societies with over a billion people
Exactly. We have to keep our energy up.
Not even OAN.
Hmm. That's interesting.
silence intensifies
The clot intensifies
Both newsmax and fox news covered it this morning
In what context? Once? Lol. 🤓
I did not read them to any great extent, but it appears to confirm a deep connection between FBI and tech. We knew it. This confirms it.
I wonder if this permits folk to sue with valid standing?
This is what your FBI agent looks like
I found some crickets.
WBBM Chicago Headline "news" as of a few minutes ago, Twitter has more hate speech since Elon took over. Nothing else about Twitter. The enemy is very upset.
They’re busy trying to figure out how they’re going to spin it as a Russian disinformation
Kek
I agree. They're not going to put a spotlight on this...
Yeah, all the media ops have blood on their hands, so I don’t anticipate them showcasing their complicity anytime soon
Nothing will come of it.
I'm more curious of who the Republicans were that asked for delete/banning in Trumps admin. I wouldn't be surprised if it was bill barr etc also asking for conservatives to be banned.
I think Bill Barr would count as DOJ, rather than Republicans.
He counts as a fat useless fuck.
Counts twice
😆👍
Shocked!!!
Lance Wallnau on RAV was talking this morning about how the trending topics on Twitter shape what journalists and influencers choose to write about. It won't be a fast change, but if conservatives can air their thoughts on the Twitter public square, it's likely to have an impact, over time.
What is she wearing? Does it reference the king cheating on his wife and replacing her with one of his employee’s wife?
They're talking about Catherine, Princess of Wales. She is the one married to Diana's son William, Prince of Wales, and she wore one of Diana's favorite pieces of jewelry last night (an emerald-and diamond choker)
The prince & princess were both at the Earthshot Prize thing in Boston last night. Earthshot is largely sponsored by the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation, so there's that.
Media won't report on their own crimes.
Damned by the crickets.
No. https://archive.ph/SrQsz
That is a CNN take
Released Twitter emails show how employees debated how to handle 2020 New York Post Hunter Biden story
By Brian Fung, CNN Updated 11:11 PM EST, Fri December 2, 2022
https://archive.ph/SrQsz
(Then-CEO Jack Dorsey – whom Taibbi said was not involved in the decision – has told US lawmakers that in hindsight, suppressing the story was a mistake.)
The emails Taibbi obtained are consistent with what former Twitter site integrity head Yoel Roth told journalist Kara Swisher in an onstage interview earlier this week. During that interview, Roth said he felt at the time that the Post reporting bore the hallmarks of a Russian hack-and-leak operation, an assessment that was shared at the time by dozens of former US intelligence officials. Roth did not respond to CNN’s request for comment
Taibbi said in his series of tweets that “there is no evidence - that I’ve seen - of any government involvement in the laptop story.”
Taibbi said the contact from political parties happened more frequently from Democrats, but provided no internal documents to back up his assertion. He also did not say that Democrats requested that Twitter suppress the Post story, and his account did not suggest that the US government had ever pressured Twitter to suppress the story.
Sanitized headline.
More sanitizing. Nothing nefarious here.....it was all made public by Twitter, see?
None of this matters. It's about suppressing the reporting of the laptop. Journalists are explicitly protected when disseminating information, so long as they, themselves, didn't do anything illegal to attain it. Journalists have shared stolen info many, many times (e.g. Snowden)
Gaslighting . The drop is about Twitter bias moreso that Government involvement. Also, the Biden Campaign was not Government and they made requests. Again...gaslighting.
The numerous images of emails to this effect aren't proof? Sure thing, CNN.
When used to watch it years ago, local news stations had tip hotlines where viewers could call with news leads. Maybe it would spur on some reporters if patriots would call their local station under the guise of a normie, with the “tip” that they wanted the news station to investigate what Musk has been releasing on Twitter.
If enough people called in, the station might cave to their viewership’s interest to do a story. Once local news might start covering it, perhaps the national ones might feel obligated to follow.
it wasn't much of a dump. It was the equivalent of a short news article, and most of the information was stuff we already knew.
MSM doesn't care this morning at all.
That's why I'm hopeful that they are doing the Project Veritas approach. Drop a little to allow the the perpetrators to respond, then unload the good stuff. Catch them in bigger lies. Monday might be interesting
Me too. Musk tweeted yesterday that Episode Two of the Twitter Files would be today: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1598864377750306816?cxt=HHwWgICq_cWrp7AsAAAA
The Project Veritas approach of hyping up a release, only for it to turn out to be a lukewarm turd that gets zero traction from the un-pilled?
a la Al Capone's Vaults?
FoxNews has it second on their mobile site.
I do consider them MSM
Fox had a top story on it for a while last night. I believe the story was about there being only one Democrat who originally questioned that the laptop story should be looked at. But don’t hold me to those details. At the same time I went to CNN and MSNBC. Nothing. In fact, the lead story on CNN was about the closing arguments in the Trump org. Trial. When I checked elsewhere on Fox online, they not only had the lead story for a while, they also had about 2-3 other related stories about it. I know Tucker and Laura Ingraham also devoted time to it. This is really the best scenario. Fox absolutely has issues, but these were good stories, and since Fox is absolutely crushing the other MSM in viewership with a huge ratings increase this year, I’m hoping that any liberals who view this will spread the word. I’ll take anything at this point.
Like it or loath it, the UK’s Daily Mail has been on this more than any other mainstream news site. Sixth biggest online news site in the world, apparently.
CNN had article under CNN Business. Basically for them a nothingburger.
It is front page of Drudge
You read that left-wing rag? I quit Drudge about six months after he sold it.
I go on occasionally to see what the enemy is thinking, else my views will become myopic within an echo chamber.
ABC: "What 'Twitter dump'?"
NBC: "What 'Twitter dump'?"
CBS: "What 'Twitter dump'?"
MSNBC: "What 'Twitter dump'?"
CNN: "It's Trump's Fault!"
I saw it mentioned on Yahoo news.
Yahoo News is an aggregate, like MSN.com.
Compare:
Some Empty File Folders at Mar Lago made national headlines
NuKclear Kode: Up Down Left Right Left Right A B Start
For fun I went on Canadian news websites. ZERO coverage. Then I decided to Google. What did I find? 3 articles from leftists rags shitting on the release. The Rolling Stones said it was a "snoozefest"
How could i if i don't watch MSM
CNN had not one mention
I just did a search and found it covered on fox, CNN, NBC and even Rolling Stone magazine. Shrugs.
Conspiracy FACTS
You mean like this? https://patriots.win/p/142AmpxTey/warning-spoiler-alert/c/
Hannity show was talking about it.
Why are you asking?
If it's to prove hypocrisy... well it's well proven and nothing came from that approach for at least 20 years
They can have their bubble of delusion and fake news. I haven't been a part of it in twenty years. I have noticed that reality is slowly getting spread to a larger audience. I don't feel quite so isolated these days.
If free speech can have a true renaissance, maybe things will get better. I am not too encouraged though. As long as there is a two-tiered justice system, the deep state will just be slightly annoyed by the whole affair.
At least for now, we are the news.
They didn't even cover ye did they?
It takes them a couple of days to come up with a narrative, but don’t worry, as soon as they do they’ll all be parroting it. It’ll probably involve some specific word that they can all repeat.
No... it was just confirmation of the blatantly obvious.
CNN
They cant ignore it. The narrative is shifting.
Leftist party-line mouthpiece DrudgeReport originally linked to NY Post article on Twitter scandal.
Later they substituted weasily WA Examiner link, entitled: "SOCIAL REVEALS CENSORSHIP FILES IS MUSK HOLDING BACK?"