It's like he doesn't want to run in 2024 and is pulling a Kanye,
We have rules against raping children - why would we want to throw those out?
I suppose "allows for termination of all rules" doesn't mean "let's terminate all rules" but he's getting annoyingly close to that
In the context of the topic at hand
Quite sad that you had to state this. SMH.
I don't see it anywhere near being problematic. He's explaining what happens as a result of massive fraud, not condoning it.
He called for protests over the AZ fraud; unfortunately, the GOP/RNC once again backed down like pussies. The gov't has no standing at this point, as it is apparently corrupt to the core.
I don't understand this either. I don't understand the way he's been talking lately. My only conclusion is, I'm hoping he's doing some art of war shit.
Read his exact words, not the media's twist on it. Use your own mind to understand what he said before passing judgement.
I'm not passing judgement, I just have a massive headache today. I also don't know the entire constitution off the top of my head, so I'd have to do some digging into it to figure out what he's referring to. Again... Too much headache. I haz the dumbs today.
He is talking about voter fraud and how it nullifies the act of certifying the election in the halls of congress, as that was not addressed in the constitution, only that the v.president has sole authority on certification. It doesn't address the process for not certifying it, therefore nullifying the constitutions rules for elections as an honest election was never had to begin with in 2020.
Tried to explain this to a democrat, they are too stupid to realize this. Saying that a democrat VP would control the rest of the presidential process.
Oh, thank you for that
No problem
To trigger the RINO’s, they can’t help but to respond thus exposing themselves.
RINOs needs no apostrophe
Nor do you need to correct others grammar, stay on point and focus on the topic at hand
"others", in this case, does need an apostrophe
Thank you. We need to represent.
Fuck off
As many as I want to give it Sheldon
Stop being such a big willow, Leonard.
The MASSIVE FRAUD allows the termination of all rules, including grammar!!
I believe he is invoking Brunson.
Well, the little fuggots put a low IQ in the Supreme Court, she needs to be ejected too.
Nothing in the constitution about raping kids. The constitution sets the rules for the federal government to keep their shit hands off of state laws. Don't even think about twisting my words to think I support child rape. Pedophiles, rapists and treasonous politicians deserve public executions on the steps of the capitol.
Edited to add: quit twisting trumps words to say things he didn't say.
Trump didn't specify only federal laws.
Yeah he didn't specify any laws in particular but that's the problem with broad sweeping generalizations.
The problem comes when media doesn't use exact quotes and insinuates falsehoods which, in turn leads to normies inferring those falsehoods and being angered by a big nothingburger, therefore turning their gaze from Mount doom, toward the black gate and sympathizing with the enemy. "Why are all those people who used to be heroes attacking something that's been there keeping us safe for so long!?!?!" When the actual danger lays in what they have been hiding behind the whole time. Those black gates (the constitution) were (was) not erected to keep Mordor (the federal government) safe. It was erected to keep Mordor (the Federal government) out of Middle Earth (the individual states respectively).
"Fraud vitiates everything" has been SCOTUS precedent for a while now. Meaning that any action take under the procedural assumption of no fraud is null & void. Things like amendments passed via fraud, even if they would have passed without it, would be considered null, if I understand it correctly.
Considering that this isn't addressed in the Constitution, some precedent would have to be created.
So I think "all rules" means any rules that are relevant.
He could also mean that Dems are able to terminate any laws they want because they can keep getting elected through fraud.
so what does this say for any acts passed during the fraudulent presidencies of Chester Arthur and Barack Obama, much less Biden?
Late to respond, but I'm not sure if Arthur was a fraud. I'm pretty sure Obama wasn't even though he was a bad president. But I'd expect that there'd still have to be standing (eliminating Arthur and Obama's first term), and within a period of time that would allow remedy (which might eliminate Obama).
Perhaps he wants millions of supporters to swarm the capitols and protest until the govt doesn’t know what to do anymore. But he doesn’t want to SAY that?
Maybe but that doesn't require suspending any laws.
In fact if laws were suspended they could just shoot protesters.
Trump keeps tip toeing but he needs to make a third party and from there reform the government. The constitution is just an old piece of paper, times have changed greatly since then.
Ok sheep. Keep allowing the elections to be rigged and see what happens.
Starting a 3rd party would have the same effect as a rigged election. D’s will keep their cult together while R’s base is fractured in two…