Comments (200)
sorted by:
bf4truth 375 points ago +376 / -1

this is insane

hobbs not only committed high crimes by removing your civil rights via your right to vote (crashing 30-40% of the machines on election day, creating 2+ hours lines - I know a lady that took 3 hours to vote), but also your ability to speak freely. In her official capacity as SoS she removed your voice and censored you, in direct violation of the 1st amendment, with the purpose of interfering in an election. And not just any election, but her OWN election.

dont take the media's silence on this as a sign of how important this is. This is huge, MASSIVE really. 10000x worse than watergate. The media is quiet because theyre part of the crime and complicit. Its like the getaway driver not wanting to talk. Hobbs is guilty of high crimes, election interference, and depriving countless civilians of their civil rights.

OP where did they get this e-mail? I saw it on twitter but I couldnt find it. edit: ppl below linked to the case

Emodius 165 points ago +166 / -1

She should be in prison over this.

PraiseBeToScience 128 points ago +128 / -0

Once was a time she'd already be hanging from a tree.

TheTrain 40 points ago +40 / -0

Musket ball threw the heart from close range

Firespawn 47 points ago +47 / -0

Save ammo and rope, beat her with a boot heel. Treason deserves the most severe punishment, she should feel it before she feels no more.

keeman 20 points ago +20 / -0

In medieval times, traitors were given the gibbet cage. Romans crucified traitors.

OrangeElvis 4 points ago +4 / -0

Citizens couldnt be crucified - it was considered too harsh.

hdhdhdhdbdbdbsb 1 point ago +2 / -1

Democrats no longer have to campaign.. they have far left fake news media to campaign on their behalf as 24/7 infomercials for them and then they have big tech to silence their critics and boost news articles that paint them in a good lightt

which is the other side of the big tech censorship coin. they censor things that are negative towards Democrats and then boost things that are positive towards them

Democrat politicians don't have to campaign. they don't have to run a single ad or hold a single rally. they have a bunch of unregistered super pacs to do that for them

Worldtraveler0405 4 points ago +4 / -0

Didn't they quarter?

User_X 1 point ago +1 / -0

[email protected] address literally spells out "government at Twitter".

It was a tool used against the citizens by the government illegally.

ResortPede303 5 points ago +5 / -0

Vans slip on. Draw. It. Out.

TheTrain 5 points ago +5 / -0

A fitting demise hard to beat that one 👍

Mooksayshigh 1 point ago +1 / -0

Arizona has lakes, the water is free.

QuickHands 8 points ago +9 / -1

JohnFetterwoman/Anaconda/QLARP/mikepence123 bringing the spice 🌶️🌶️🌶️

CheapChinesePlastic 4 points ago +5 / -1

Back in that day there would be no "she" running for political office.

coiffuse 4 points ago +5 / -1

They will not be able to walk the streets - Q - you know they go from their armor cars to their planes to their homes behind ten foot concrete fences.... it is so obvious now what they have done. And Chuck Schwab... we need to bring that arrogant nazi fuck down off his pedestal - stop calling him Klaus (sound too much like Santa).... I'm thinking when we are all dead, he won't be able to fix anything. He reads a lot.... politicians read a lot, but can't fix shit....

America1stAndOnly 2 points ago +3 / -1

Once was a time in which we were smart enough to not let women get this kind of power.

vodka_soda 34 points ago +35 / -1

No. Actually it is treason. She should die for it technically

HOSEQ 4 points ago +4 / -0

""Corruption of Blood.....

Pepelosi 13 points ago +14 / -1

Skip the prison, straight to the gallows for treason.

HOSEQ 3 points ago +3 / -0

Corruption of Blood.....

Muttsbitetoo 3 points ago +4 / -1

Prison or morgue?

Worldtraveler0405 2 points ago +2 / -0

She will be sooner or later. Judgement day.

View 2 more comments
IncredibleMrE1 62 points ago +63 / -1

This goes beyond Hobbs - CISA and DHS facilitated. This is the federal bureaucracy directly interfering in an election and silencing speech it didn't like.

PorchLightOn 23 points ago +23 / -0

That's what it looks like to me, too. Under the guise of protecting elections against "misinformation."

ppler 39 points ago +39 / -0

Citizen arrest and take her to Cochise or Mojave county court for a fair trial where the patriots are. This is actually plausible.

RamboDrivesALambo 12 points ago +12 / -0

The residents of Cochise and Mojave need to empower their sheriffs to go arrest her, they are given this power to take care of situations exactly like this. It's also why sheriffs can deputize, in case they need a posse big enough to handle a police department/outlaw gang.

CrackerJack2 5 points ago +5 / -0

I always wanted to be in a posse.
I get to have to thrill of the chase, be on the right side of the law, and then come home to peace and quiet after a day or two and relax.

No_DEF_Diesel_Beetle 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is why patriots should be focused on their local government. Can't do anything unless you have a Sherriff willing to enforce the law and a judge that enforces the Constitution.

FucKamala 11 points ago +11 / -0

You would be gunned down by AZ law enforcement for trying

offsubject 7 points ago +7 / -0

Then the fake stream media would have 24hr a day coverage on "domestic terrorisms"

Rockwell 9 points ago +9 / -0

Maybe it's not the politicians who need to be dealt with. Maybe it's the media. They aren't protected by bodyguards like politicians are. 🦆🦆🦆🦆

dakin116 3 points ago +3 / -0

Muh rank and file

BloodDe 7 points ago +7 / -0

The entire Democrat party is worse than watergate by far…

They’re more comparable to O.J. Simpson

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
View 2 more comments
CounterStrike 66 points ago +69 / -3

Gonna need some sauce on this...

RedditSuxAss 74 points ago +75 / -1

Check the case number at the top there - 3:22-cv-01213

I just Googled it and found the case. Scroll down to document 71-8.


PorchLightOn 54 points ago +54 / -0

Yes, looks like this is on page 45 of attachment 8, filed 8/31/22, so it's a real document submitted to court as part of this case: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63290154/71/8/missouri-v-biden/

If you go to page 46 of the above document, you can (sort of) see an image of a redacted tweet. The letter says:

"Of specific concern to the Secretary of State are the following Tweets: (redacted) (redacted)

"These messages falsely assert that the Voter Registration System is owned and therefore operated by foreign actors. This is an attempt to further undermine confidence in the election institution in Arizona."

Sincerely, (redacted)

IncredibleMrE1 50 points ago +51 / -1

Those are CISA and DHS domains. This isn't even a smoking gun, this is HD footage of the unmasked shooter in the act of pulling the trigger.

Pepelosi 13 points ago +13 / -0

While signing their name and giving a DL, birth certificate and a thumb print.

n4freedom 5 points ago +5 / -0

That domain is the center for internet security not CISA, it's a non profit dedicated to cybersecurity, quite good at what they do on a technical side. The fact they have a hand in thisnis very disappointing.

PorchLightOn 6 points ago +6 / -0

I appreciate the input about CIS, I'm not familiar with who they are. I did see that they're federally funded, but they've also accepted donations from very lefty sources, which makes me wonder if they've been co-opted in recent years (?) https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/center-for-internet-security/

The CISA domain is in there too (@cisa.dhs.gov) at the very top of this document. And when I read further into this exhibit, to see similar communications from other state SoS officials about Twitter and Facebook, CISA is mixed in with this everywhere.Their domain shows up, and people are referencing contacting CISA. So the CIS and CISA both seem to be involved in this.

But, as Chris Krebs said, the 2020 election was "the most secure election in the history of the country," so I'm sure there's nothing to worry about...

Enlightenment_Now 5 points ago +5 / -0

It certainly was the most secure.

They fortified the hell out of it to be sure they would win.

PorchLightOn 4 points ago +4 / -0

You're so right. We're still discovering the fortifications.

n4freedom 2 points ago +2 / -0

You know from a being hacked perspective it may have been well protected because running fake ballots has nothing to do with hacking.

PorchLightOn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right; personally I think the steal was a combination of different techniques, varied from one place to the next, and they vary it from one election to the next, depending on what people are watching. I think there was data manipulation in some locations; because I've soon too many reports in different states, outed by different data analysts, for me to discount it. But also, illegitimate ballots as well.

That phrase by Krebs ("most secure") can have a ton of different meanings, and these people learned a long time ago to use language in ways that lets them dance past the truth.

... continue reading thread?
IncredibleMrE1 2 points ago +3 / -1

CIS is who Hobbgoblin initially talked to, I was referring to Twitter's response which cc'd CISA/DHS.

Spez: Furthermore, CIS is basically a government front.

The Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC) is a "round-the-clock cyber threat monitoring and mitigation center for state and local governments" operated by CIS under a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). https://www.cisa.gov/partnership-engagement-branch

n4freedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've worked with CIS and know people who work for them. I know what an ISAC is, they are very useful in the cyber community. This is my domain and I know CIS is a very important player in this space.

What they should not be doing is misinformation, it has nothing to do their mission.

CheapChinesePlastic -3 points ago +1 / -4

Nobody will do anything about it though

Emodius 15 points ago +16 / -1

Yeah even if it is owned it doesn't follow that it is operated, wow. Further, why is that speculation bad? If there is a possibility it is true, no matter how remote, that kind of speculation should be encouraged.

IncredibleMrE1 20 points ago +21 / -1

Questioning things is a serious threat to Our Democracy (TM)

Emodius 6 points ago +6 / -0


lixa 13 points ago +13 / -0

You mean like they constantly insist Russia got Trump elected?

Worldtraveler0405 5 points ago +5 / -0

And this is a case that hasn't been DiSpOoTeD or DiSmIsSeD yet?

PorchLightOn 4 points ago +4 / -0

No, it's still an active case, but I've not been paying attention to it. (Maybe another pede can step in here with a summary, if they know it?) I'm trying to get caught up on this one.

TheOutlawPepeWales 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nothing restores confidence in the election institution like a little civil rights abuse.

PorchLightOn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well said!

View 1 more comment
bobobob 11 points ago +11 / -0

Missouri vs Biden challenged Biden's healthcare vaccine mandate

PorchLightOn 23 points ago +23 / -0

The next document (p.47 in the same attachment) is a Misinformation Report filed by the Kentucky SoS, about a Twitter account "alleging election fraud."

The next document (p.51) is from the SoS in Washington, filing a misinformation report, about "12 Tweets alleging election fraud with Dominion equipment in Washinton state."

The next document is from the PA Dept of State, asking Twitter to review a video they believe is false.

The next one is from Michigan, reporting what they believe is false information about elections reported on Facebook.

The next one is from Colorado, reporting false election information being reported on Facebook.

And so on. I'm just trying to understand what we're seeing here. These documents don't all deal with Twitter. Some are communications from various states, dealing with communications between Facebook and something called the Center for Internet Security.

I looked that up, and it's a non-profit group "specializing in cyber-security research which provides cyber-security consulting services to local, state, and federal governments. The organization has been awarded $115 million in federal grants by the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Defense since 2010, and has received $3.6 million in cybersecurity contracts from numerous federal agencies since 2005." https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/center-for-internet-security/

I guess what these documents show is an extensive network of communications that are used by states to report "election misinformation" to this federally-funded non profit CIS, and the information also goes to CISA (part of DHS.) This is a lot to unpack...

Amaroq64 17 points ago +17 / -0

Sounds like they're laundering their censorship with an extra degree of separation through that third party.

PorchLightOn 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think that's a good way to put it. Just because that non-profit is heavily funded by the government doesn't mean they haven't been co-opted to put their thumb on the scale of one party over another. That link shows they've received additional money from far left sources too.

CrackerJack2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nice job summarizing.

But, the DemocRATs would claim only one of those "Election Deniers" could have this much incite and perseverance.

PorchLightOn 4 points ago +4 / -0

I hate it when something interesting pops up as I'm heading to bed, lol. I'm still trying to wrap my brain around the size of this info, this morning. There look to be a staggering number of documents in this exhibit, shared from multiple states, reporting "misinformation" found on both Twitter and Facebook.

I don't think many people in the public knew this was going on. I sure didn't. And if Elon Musk hadn't released the Twitter Files, I don't know if this particular Hobbs document would have been dug out of a court exhibit from August, and put into a forum for people like us to talk about.

CrackerJack2 5 points ago +5 / -0

You pull a loose thread and more and more come from it.
Their crimes against violating our Constitutional rights are being exposed at an increasing rate.

NavyGuy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for the link

day221 1 point ago +4 / -3

Still using Google for your searches in 2022? Deserve everything that's happening.

RedditSuxAss 1 point ago +1 / -0

You posted that with your new iPhone while watching the NFL.

day221 0 points ago +1 / -1

Brave browser on a android. And you can't compare the two. It takes two seconds and no effort to change your default search engine, but if we did it would cost Google (a company that wants you dead) hundreds of billions of dollars.

Yet you actually defend them. So yeah, people like you deserve to lose. The one comfort in all this is that you retards are going to get fucked by the monster you yourself fed and defended. Can't even change a simple setting on your phone to stop supporting commies. Get out.

RedditSuxAss 1 point ago +1 / -0

Android? So you love Google too? Cool! I just Googled "faggot" and your post history came up.

day221 1 point ago +1 / -0

You know after you flush the toilet there are still little tiny microscopic pieces of shit still in there right? By your logic you shouldn't flush the toilet, because even people who do still have shit in it.

Search is what Google makes 90% of their money on. It takes two seconds and no effort for you to deny them that. Yeah it's a lot harder to get rid of all microscopic google shit, nice excuse retard. You're such a cuck you make up retarded excuses to defend them and make them rich. They want you dead. Are you stupid?

Deltamyass 20 points ago +20 / -0

Those CISecurity and cisa.dhs.gov email anddresses are legitimate. I worked cybersec for a local college that was eligible to become a member of CISA and CISecurity. Those email accounts were used for communication. We had monthly calls with them and received vulnerability reports.

deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
PorchLightOn 12 points ago +12 / -0


Nonprofit, founded in 2000, providing cyber-security consulting services to local, state, and federal governments. The organization has been awarded $115 million in federal grants by the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Defense since 2010, and has received $3.6 million in cybersecurity contracts from numerous federal agencies since 2005.

The Center for Internet Security is led by president and CEO John Gilligan, who previously served in senior advisory positions in intelligence and security for the United States Airforce, Department of Energy, and White House Cyber Security Commission under the Obama administration.

Since 2016, the organization has been active in researching and providing cyber security for election administration. In April 2019, the organization published “A Guide for Ensuring Security in Election Technology Procurements,” which was funded by a $290,000 grant from Pierre Omidyar’s Democracy Fund.

Deltamyass 11 points ago +11 / -0

CIS and CISA is the government, yes.. that’s why our college was eligible to get quick reports of vulnerability and other things. It protects government infrastructure.

TommyLasordasBallBag 10 points ago +11 / -1

Same. OP, please don't be a faggot

SCP0073 9 points ago +9 / -0

Someone replied to OP the previous comment with a source

TommyLasordasBallBag 14 points ago +14 / -0

Thanks, I saw it was forwarded to Lake's lawyers as well. We're moving fast, boys.

SCP0073 6 points ago +6 / -0

Buckle up buckaroos.

MemeWarsVet 4 points ago +5 / -1


deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
View 2 more comments
_Sully_ 59 points ago +59 / -0

She couldn’t hide her smugness. She thinks so little of the people that she doesn’t even bother hiding her contempt. Whether this is true or not you can just see it on that woman’s face that she wasn’t concerned in the slightest that she wouldn’t win. Why? Because she’s been installed. The people need to just this shit down before she can do anything. She will work fast.

sully 22 points ago +22 / -0

Hobbs needs to swing.

Heavy_Metal_Patriot 38 points ago +38 / -0

Campaigning is for losers.

Formerlurker92 34 points ago +34 / -0

Campaigns are for people that need the consent of the governed

Nuclear246 5 points ago +5 / -0

Most profound statement I have read on here in a long while. God help us all!

Escapethink 7 points ago +7 / -0

Just hide in the fast food restroom.

Heavy_Metal_Patriot 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's the clear path to victory!

deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
knnbccb 34 points ago +34 / -0

Unless you hang them, they will try this again and again.

Also, don't just hang the minions... hang their financiers. Follow the money trail, and let the rope do the talking.

CheapChinesePlastic 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's antisemitic though

JESUSJUGS 4 points ago +5 / -1

And their families, too.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
OrangeCatBad 22 points ago +22 / -0

If they swear this theif in isn't this grounds to impeach her as she directly violated an American citizen right to free speech

Fidget 0 points ago +1 / -1

Who’s her next in line?

maga4liferealpatriot 18 points ago +18 / -0

So uhhh let me guess some guy some where is gonna write a sternly worded letter telling them that they shouldn't do that, cause like it's bad and stuff

Joeret 11 points ago +11 / -0

Well, yeah of course and then in two weeks you’re going to see something real big.

Hoping for the best but this is a running joke now.

maga4liferealpatriot 7 points ago +7 / -0

Kraken coming, they're on it for sure

flyover_deplorable 4 points ago +4 / -0

cough Lindsay cough Graham

EJay_Scott 17 points ago +17 / -0


ppler 10 points ago +10 / -0

and taking her to a court in Cochise or Mojave county would actually receive a fair trial!!! The board of supervisors in either is 2/3 patriots. I'd go for Cochise.

Where does Katie Hobbs live? Asking for a friend.

Whatyougotson 7 points ago +7 / -0

Behind a big beautiful wall with 24/7 security. Biggest house with the greenest grass. Your friend is smart in knowing everyone who lives on this earth sleeps somewhere but unless her residence is public info we wouldnt be able to post it nor msg it because this place has a crack, and i mean crack, team of faggot fbi gaybois who constantly get what little adrenaline rushes they can by sowing discourse on posts and comments the boss tells them to to vagely target. Truely remarkable those pickle puffers are.

MrMcGreenGenes 17 points ago +19 / -2

The great thing about this is that if they destroy the gov't, that 19th Amendment ain't gonna mean jack shit anymore.

offsubject 4 points ago +5 / -1

I love it when people discuss the root issues plaguing our country.

GainesvilleFlorida 16 points ago +16 / -0

Unbelievable. Actual violation of first amendment

Joshua55 11 points ago +12 / -1

Imagine my shock and surprise.

Blue_Falcons_Suck 11 points ago +11 / -0

Criminals are going to criminal... Problem for them, they got too comfortable.

mojorisen 10 points ago +10 / -0

Doesn't matter. For criminals to stop, they have to be punished. Problem is that the agencies that do the punishing are also in on the steal.

DonttrustChina 11 points ago +11 / -0

Uh oh! She actually WAS in public office at the time, making this a direct first amendment violation, a government official directing censorship. SUE.

Itiswrittenkjv1611 10 points ago +10 / -0

Uh what am I looking at

Backslash2099 30 points ago +30 / -0

You're looking at an email from the Secretary of State of Arizona requesting censorship of a Twitter account from Twitter. 100% in violation of the first amendment.

Itiswrittenkjv1611 12 points ago +12 / -0

Niiiice pede thanks

starjello 7 points ago +9 / -2

For there to be true Justice Hobbs must be hung. She needs the death penalty. Now let the obligatory Q tard who stalks my every comment downvote. That is you cat jive.

FucKamala 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fucking redacted. I want names

FiresideRant 3 points ago +3 / -0

Really tired of the redacted shit. This garbage is no less a part of the corruption than any other facet of it.

KidDynomite 6 points ago +6 / -0

So it's late at night but hear me out on this one.

CONFIDENTIAL is a security classification marking, meaning someone in the government, rightly or wrongly, has classified the document. Classified documents can only be processed on systems accredited to that level of classification, meaning that if these emails are legit and originated/sent between two unclassified systems then a couple of crimes were committed.

It is illegal to process/send classified information on a network not accredited for that particular classification.

It is illegal to classify information in an attempt to cover up a crime, or to hide something politically embarrassing.

TL:DR - if these emails are real and stamped with CONFIDENTIAL then the existence of the emails constitute a crime on the part of the originator.

krackenPie 3 points ago +3 / -0

We use Coincidental in our business communication. I hear and agree with what you said as at one point I too had a clearance and worked with DoD classified material. But what you are saying is only true if the classification originated from a classifying authority and could exist in a legal sense on a classified network. I dont think there is a classifying authority for this type of high level (Confidential,Secret,Top Secret) classification within the framework of this communication. Your heart is in the right place tho fren!

StoneColdSteveAutism 5 points ago +5 / -0

Dems really going for the Covid tactics of campaign from home Lolol

The_Zebra 5 points ago +5 / -0

Governor Lake will play out the process some more, because it is the correct thing to do, but eventually she will probably need to order the arrest of Katie Hobbs for treason. Then the question will be, does Arizona’s law enforcement choose to stick to their oaths and to serve the people of Arizona, or do they show themselves as weasels who will stoop to the lowest of lows for their pensions?

ChickenStrips 5 points ago +5 / -0

Where’d this come from?!? Woah

snakeoil 5 points ago +6 / -1

Why is the name blacked out?

PraiseBeToScience 4 points ago +4 / -0

Think about how great it would be if the sun belched the motherfucker of all solar flares at us and it blew up all our technology.

Antenna 4 points ago +4 / -0

Besides Twitter, she didn't need to campaign because FTX funded Katie Hobbs campaign

Edial 4 points ago +5 / -1

Such a smug, evil cunt.

Spawnlingman 4 points ago +4 / -0

This needs to be resticked for the day crew.

EdisonHwy 2 points ago +2 / -0


EdmondDaunts 4 points ago +4 / -0

This actually came from another case, the one where Fauci was deposed. So much overlap. So many threads linked together with people thinking they were above the law.

Is this many tentacled beast the nemesis of the Chan Beast?

PorchLightOn 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pretty soon we're all gonna be like that guy in the meme, waving his arms at bulletin boards lined with red string and thumbtacks, trying to connect all this overlap.

RationalThought 3 points ago +4 / -1

Who could have guessed that our Gov is corrupt and elections have been rigged since 2016, if not WAY before that date. I believe Trump was a fluke looking back at Gov stooge after Gov stooge elected to the white house. Reagan legalised how many illegals? And it is spread forth that "he was only doing it to secure the border"... News flash Hannity R's, REAGaN KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING, AND IT WAS NOT TO HELP OUR COUNTRY.

Mindcrime 3 points ago +3 / -0

This cunt is a traitor.

AbrahamLincoln 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hobbs didn't bother to pretend to campaign because AZ didn't hold an election. Twitter had nothing to do with it. I results were decided months ago.

WarGreymon77 3 points ago +4 / -1

People are focusing on tweets, but that's not the real issue in regards to stealing elections. It's fly-by-night truckloads of fake ballots, things like that.

OKRancher 6 points ago +6 / -0

People are focusing on Tweets because Elon just dropped a truth bomb about Twitter. No one’s forgotten.

JLPWave 3 points ago +3 / -0

Finally after 2 days the real information gets sticked and not just circle jerk.

To Elon Musk's credit he did deliver this time. I have been critical of him so I feel its important to give credit where credit is due.

That being said stickies about important information should be reserved for the actual information itself, not reddit tier circlejerks. Its frustrating when you are trying to find out information and nobody knows anything, they are just pointing to the other guy saying "didn't you hear?" without providing anything of value.

n4freedom 3 points ago +3 / -0

As someone very familiar with CIS, this should have no part in what they do. They deal with cybersecurity, the fact they have their hand in this is retarded.

PorchLightOn 2 points ago +2 / -0

The current CEO, John Gilligan, stepped into that role in 2018. He was previously Chairman of the Board, and I haven't had time to dig into his background. But maybe when he became CEO, some new directions were developed...? I don't know. https://www.cisecurity.org/about-us/leadership/john-m-gilligan

View 23 more comments