Based on empirical data, the world will need more CO2 in the future, not less. Increasing CO2 increases plants water use efficiency and allows more crop production with less water. To feed everyone in the future, we will need higher CO2 levels. And, there is no real evidence that CO2 increases global temperatures (Some models, but they are someone's guess). Your government is promoting the exact opposite of what needs to be done. Your government is using this as a way to get you to submit to their desires and implement "Satans New World Order". I will debate anyone who is serious and has been studying the issue for at least a couple of decades. The University/industry/government complex is controlling this information the same way they have controlled the information on Covid-19, by removing those who speak out against their fraud. I have spoken out at my University and they removed me from my professorship. (At my age, who cares; lol)
Carbon Dioxide is not pollution.
The models add in the extra CO2 but forget to subtract the O2 molecule needed to make it.
Atmospheric density is a more important factor in figuring out how much heat a planet will retain.
Mars' atmosphere is 95% CO2 and as Elton sang "in fact it's cold as hell".
Not really. All molecules are not the same for holding heat. Doesn’t matter though. We aren’t talking about a lot of CO2 it’s really a trace gas in the atmosphere, not even 2%.
The best part is that C02 levels have over doubled since the 1800s, but the average temperature has only increased by up to .8 celsius max, as little as 0. That means, if the doomsday scenario of 2.5 degrees of temperature increase resulting in permanent global damage is true, we can increase atmospheric C02 by almost exponentially more than we have and be fine, according to all the current, accepted data.
I'm pretty sure CO2 is about .04% of the atmosphere.
Something like that. I don’t know the exact number. The 2% I use is from the toxicity concentration for humans. Hence why I said less. But yea, it’s trace concentration. Air is mostly nitrogen, with some oxygen and trace amounts of other stuff.
The models add in the extra CO2 but forget to subtract the O2 molecule
But how can you subtract O2 when maths are rayciss