Let's start working on this. I want each of you to think of this term:
VOTER DISENFRANCHISEMENT. Memorize it. Repeat it 10 times. Tell yourself and others that this is the most important political issue from now until it is resolved.
Wait there's another sale? Honestly I didn't think the My pillow I bought was the best pillow ever, but I'd buy another one with a based sounding promo code
This assertion is factually correct. Arizona has specific laws for challenging a certified election. 16-671 through 16-678
ANY voter can file a "statement of contest" which is effectively an affidavit that says "statement of contest" at the top of the page. This can be filed by any voter in any county. We have 5 days from today for everyone to convert their affidavit to a "statement of contest".
A. Any elector of the state may contest the election of any person declared elected to a state office, or declared nominated to a state office at a primary election, or the declared result of an initiated or referred measure, or a proposal to amend the Constitution of Arizona, or other question or proposal submitted to vote of the people, upon any of the following grounds:
That the person whose right to the office is contested was not at the time of the election eligible to the office.
That the person whose right is contested, or any person acting for him, has given to an elector, inspector, judge or clerk of election, a bribe or reward, or has offered such bribe or reward for the purpose of procuring his election, or has committed any other offense against the elective franchise.
On account of illegal votes.
That by reason of erroneous count of votes the person declared elected or the initiative or referred measure, or proposal to amend the constitution, or other question or proposal submitted, which has been declared carried, did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for the office or a sufficient number of votes to carry the measure, amendment, question or proposal.
B. The contest may be brought in the superior court of the county in which the person contesting resides or in the superior court of Maricopa county.
C. In a contest of the election of a person declared elected to a state office or of an initiated or referred measure, constitutional amendment, or other question or proposal, which has been declared carried, the attorney general may intervene, and upon demand, the place of trial of the contest shall be changed to Maricopa county, if commenced in another county.
A. The elector contesting a state election shall, within five days after completion of the canvass of the election and declaration of the result thereof by the secretary of state or by the governor, file in the court in which the contest is commenced a statement in writing setting forth:
The name of the person whose right to the office is contested, or the title of the measure, or constitutional amendment, or other proposition as it appeared upon the official ballot.
The office the election to which is contested.
The particular grounds of the contest.
B. The statement shall be verified by the affidavit of the contestor that he believes the matters and things therein contained are true.
16-675 tl;dr you can pay for a ballot inspection if you think it's critical for your contest evidence, loser pays expenses.
16-676
A. In any contest brought under the provisions of section 16-672 or 16-674, upon the filing of the answer, or if no answer is filed, upon the expiration of the time specified in the summons, the court shall set a time for the hearing of the contest, not later than ten days after the date on which the statement of contest was filed, which may be continued for not to exceed five days for good cause shown.
C. If in an election contest it appears that a person other than the contestee has the highest number of legal votes, the court shall declare that person elected and that the certificate of election of the person whose office is contested is of no further legal force or effect.
Don't put this all on Kari Lake ANY voter can file a challenge in their county court.
Every MAGA person in Arizona should be filing this paperwork, if I am understanding this correctly. or at least sign a petition of some kind getting this on the docket.
Being a "doomer" just means you're paying attention and capable of recognizing patterns. At some point people need to start acknowledging that blind naive optimism isn't a winning strategy. In fact, all it seems to do is placate people into not taking to the streets.
Start working that recall angle. Get that evidence now so you can do something in 6 months. We know aint shit happening in the courts. Gather the signatures and addresses, get the approval by overwhelming the system with signatures, then go back to those addresses to harvest those ballots.
AZ allows for a recall.
Edit: paging Scott Pressler :D
Its getting easier to spot the accounts that are only here to change the subject. ADL send you? Accounts like this are not likely Trump supporting accounts or even backed by an actual human....OR the human is working other accounts at the same time (that is how replies like this get any upvotes).
I think they get upvotes because most of the people here feel the same way. You know. Like we are tax slaves to globalist pedophiles who never seem to pay any consequences for their crimes…. Unless I missed the Gitmo hearings? Excuse me now while I wrestle a kraken and go back to trusting the plan!
What plan? That is just nonsense. There was never a plan because the ability to leverage the plan is not available. AZ does have a recall process. Either AZ actually has more republicans or they dont. If they have way way more then getting the signatures should be pretty easy...the evidence is in the twitter files. Or just do nothing.
Ballot harvesting is illegal in AZ, you can only submit ballots for members of your household. The reason Dems get away with it is because they are considering dorms, nursing homes, and halfway houses/homeless shelters a "household" but only Dems are allowed to define their household. I dare any else to try it.
Bottom section regarding the definition of "Caregiver". No Republicans in nursing homes anymore? Maybe some Republican kids should check on their parents/relatives in a nursing home and see how it was handled. Seems legal to me.
Arizona
Arizona permits a family member, household member, or caregiver to return a voter's absentee ballot. It establishes the collection of early ballots by anyone outside those groups as a class 6 felony. The law states the following:
“
H. A person who knowingly collects voted or unvoted early ballots from another person is guilty of a class 6 felony. An election official, a United States postal service worker or any other person who is allowed by law to transmit United States mail is deemed not to have collected an early ballot if the official, worker or other person is engaged in official duties.
I. Subsection H of this section does not apply to: ...
A family member, household member or caregiver of the voter. For the purposes of this paragraph:
(a) "Caregiver" means a person who provides medical or health care assistance to the voter in a residence, nursing care institution, hospice facility, assisted living center, assisted living facility, assisted living home, residential care institution, adult day health care facility or adult foster care home.
(b) "Collects" means to gain possession or control of an early ballot.
(c) "Family member" means a person who is related to the voter by blood, marriage, adoption or legal guardianship.
(d) "Household member" means a person who resides at the same residence as the voter.[3]
She should have led an armed uprising, but she's a coward that wants the prestige of being governor without the responsibility of actually being a real leader.
No not this time. This time it's Kari Lake! She is a fighter! She will save us all. Q was fake but Kari Lake is a real person. We just need to send more money NOW!!
Oh, and make sure you sign up for the newsletter so you never miss an update. Not because we want to sell your information to anyone willing to throw 2 bucks at us.
This is just 2020 but in AZ, nothing is gonna happen. They tried telling us Lake had it won with the outstanding ballots but it didn't happen, and neither will any of these efforts.
You are going to hear the courts new catch phrase since 2020, "No standing, dismissed" because it has no legal definition and is left up to the interpretation of the judge.
BUT DONT ACTUALLY FIGHT BECAUSE WELL MOCK YOU FOR MUH TWO MORE WEEKS
DO AN ARMED REVOLUTION...
...BUT DONT BECAUSE THATS GLOWY TALK
VOTE!!!
BUT DONT VOTE BECAUSE THE MACHINES ARE RIGGED
DONT TRY TO FIX THE FRAUD THOUGH BECAUSE NOTHING EVER CHANGES
WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO FIX THE FRAUD YOU MUST BE A GRIFTER
WIN LOCAL ELECTIONS AND APPLY FOR POLL WATCHING
BUT THE VOTES ARE FAKE SO IT DOESNT MATTER
WE DIDNT WIN THE SENATE SO NOTHING ELSE MATTERS
GEORGIA MATTERS
BUT GEORGIA DOESNT MATTER BECAUSE ITS ALL RIGGED
...
Jesus Christ Patriots.win, what the actual fuck do you want people to do? There literally isn't anything you won't complain about. The entire site seems rigged to just leave people in a toilet swirl of frustration and inaction. I was wondering why I didn't like coming here that much anymore, and now I know.
I legitimately want to do what works... can anyone actually suggest something useful?
Vote harder next time, of course. Just two more years...2024 will surely be our year. Signal not noise. Release the Kracken. The great Q oracle has surely forseen the next red wave.
As the 2018 GA election was the stress test for the 2020 election, the 2022 AZ, NV, and PA elections are the stress test for 2024. Make no mistake that the citizen response is being closely monitored for the level of pushback that will occur.
Ever notice that when you "win" something in these court challenges...nothing happens? Its because the only time your permitted to win is when there is no consequence.
Remember when all those vaccine mandate cases were won? Remember what came of that..pretty much nothing.
I expect there to be exactly zero consequence to whatever comes of these cases; except for people to be out of money to pay for lawyers.
two more weeks!
Yeah. Now comes moot...
Fraud ruins everything.
No first comes the KRAKEN 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨
Let's start working on this. I want each of you to think of this term:
VOTER DISENFRANCHISEMENT. Memorize it. Repeat it 10 times. Tell yourself and others that this is the most important political issue from now until it is resolved.
VOTER DISENFRANCHISEMENT.
VOTER DISENFRANCHISEMENT.
VOTER DISENFRANCHISEMENT.
VOTER DISENFRANCHISEMENT.
VOTER DISENFRANCHISEMENT.
Say it with me:
VOTER DISENFRANCHISEMENT.
Fraud.
Just say fraud.
Or better yet,
Say tyranny.
Lolol. I'd forgotten about Powell. She suspected real quick
Or start to shoot
Before certification, you can’t challenge election results because they are not official
After certification, you can’t challenge results because YOU HAVE NO STANDING
It’s so simple
No standing before certification because you aren't harmed yet. Moot afterwards because the election is over.
Correct. We saw this movie in 2020. First comes "no standing", followed by "moot".
I don't want to be a doomer but holy hell, did anyone actually think something would happen?
The only thing I know for sure is you can get a pillow on sale
Wait there's another sale? Honestly I didn't think the My pillow I bought was the best pillow ever, but I'd buy another one with a based sounding promo code
This assertion is factually correct. Arizona has specific laws for challenging a certified election. 16-671 through 16-678
ANY voter can file a "statement of contest" which is effectively an affidavit that says "statement of contest" at the top of the page. This can be filed by any voter in any county. We have 5 days from today for everyone to convert their affidavit to a "statement of contest".
16-672
A. Any elector of the state may contest the election of any person declared elected to a state office, or declared nominated to a state office at a primary election, or the declared result of an initiated or referred measure, or a proposal to amend the Constitution of Arizona, or other question or proposal submitted to vote of the people, upon any of the following grounds:
That the person whose right to the office is contested was not at the time of the election eligible to the office.
That the person whose right is contested, or any person acting for him, has given to an elector, inspector, judge or clerk of election, a bribe or reward, or has offered such bribe or reward for the purpose of procuring his election, or has committed any other offense against the elective franchise.
On account of illegal votes.
That by reason of erroneous count of votes the person declared elected or the initiative or referred measure, or proposal to amend the constitution, or other question or proposal submitted, which has been declared carried, did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for the office or a sufficient number of votes to carry the measure, amendment, question or proposal.
B. The contest may be brought in the superior court of the county in which the person contesting resides or in the superior court of Maricopa county.
C. In a contest of the election of a person declared elected to a state office or of an initiated or referred measure, constitutional amendment, or other question or proposal, which has been declared carried, the attorney general may intervene, and upon demand, the place of trial of the contest shall be changed to Maricopa county, if commenced in another county.
16-673
A. The elector contesting a state election shall, within five days after completion of the canvass of the election and declaration of the result thereof by the secretary of state or by the governor, file in the court in which the contest is commenced a statement in writing setting forth:
The name of the person whose right to the office is contested, or the title of the measure, or constitutional amendment, or other proposition as it appeared upon the official ballot.
The office the election to which is contested.
The particular grounds of the contest.
B. The statement shall be verified by the affidavit of the contestor that he believes the matters and things therein contained are true.
16-675 tl;dr you can pay for a ballot inspection if you think it's critical for your contest evidence, loser pays expenses.
16-676
A. In any contest brought under the provisions of section 16-672 or 16-674, upon the filing of the answer, or if no answer is filed, upon the expiration of the time specified in the summons, the court shall set a time for the hearing of the contest, not later than ten days after the date on which the statement of contest was filed, which may be continued for not to exceed five days for good cause shown.
C. If in an election contest it appears that a person other than the contestee has the highest number of legal votes, the court shall declare that person elected and that the certificate of election of the person whose office is contested is of no further legal force or effect.
Don't put this all on Kari Lake ANY voter can file a challenge in their county court.
Every MAGA person in Arizona should be filing this paperwork, if I am understanding this correctly. or at least sign a petition of some kind getting this on the docket.
Thanks, for the info. Anything someone outside Arizona can do besides watch and wait?
Being a "doomer" just means you're paying attention and capable of recognizing patterns. At some point people need to start acknowledging that blind naive optimism isn't a winning strategy. In fact, all it seems to do is placate people into not taking to the streets.
It's called being a realist.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/brazil-military-kills-red-command-cartel-leaders-prepares-take/
What's happening in post election Brazil?
MILITARY IS THE ONLY WAY....
At least she's fighting
for donations
tRuzT teH PLaAaaAAaNnnNn!!11!!!11!
I will wait one fortnight
no no two fortnights
Start working that recall angle. Get that evidence now so you can do something in 6 months. We know aint shit happening in the courts. Gather the signatures and addresses, get the approval by overwhelming the system with signatures, then go back to those addresses to harvest those ballots.
AZ allows for a recall. Edit: paging Scott Pressler :D
Oh look!! We've graduated from 2 weeks to 6 months!!
You fucking people 🤣
There is no recourse to be had in the courts.
Hold a massive Trumpish rally and get a based judge to swear in Kari Lake as governor on the same day as Hobbs does.
I'm sorry, we forgot the best plan was to just give up and roll over and let the commies have their way with us with no fight at all.....
We definitely know which side of fight or flight you fall on, Soylent Soldier!
Its getting easier to spot the accounts that are only here to change the subject. ADL send you? Accounts like this are not likely Trump supporting accounts or even backed by an actual human....OR the human is working other accounts at the same time (that is how replies like this get any upvotes).
I think they get upvotes because most of the people here feel the same way. You know. Like we are tax slaves to globalist pedophiles who never seem to pay any consequences for their crimes…. Unless I missed the Gitmo hearings? Excuse me now while I wrestle a kraken and go back to trusting the plan!
What plan? That is just nonsense. There was never a plan because the ability to leverage the plan is not available. AZ does have a recall process. Either AZ actually has more republicans or they dont. If they have way way more then getting the signatures should be pretty easy...the evidence is in the twitter files. Or just do nothing.
There is a third hole
that is a lot of extra o's there. Does the ADL pay by the o? Do you get more if you type in all caps?
Just give up. These people are weak. I'm guessing only around 20% of us actually want to fix this problem instead of waiting 2 more weeks.
Ballot harvesting is illegal in AZ, you can only submit ballots for members of your household. The reason Dems get away with it is because they are considering dorms, nursing homes, and halfway houses/homeless shelters a "household" but only Dems are allowed to define their household. I dare any else to try it.
Bottom section regarding the definition of "Caregiver". No Republicans in nursing homes anymore? Maybe some Republican kids should check on their parents/relatives in a nursing home and see how it was handled. Seems legal to me.
Arizona Arizona permits a family member, household member, or caregiver to return a voter's absentee ballot. It establishes the collection of early ballots by anyone outside those groups as a class 6 felony. The law states the following:
“ H. A person who knowingly collects voted or unvoted early ballots from another person is guilty of a class 6 felony. An election official, a United States postal service worker or any other person who is allowed by law to transmit United States mail is deemed not to have collected an early ballot if the official, worker or other person is engaged in official duties.
I. Subsection H of this section does not apply to: ...
A family member, household member or caregiver of the voter. For the purposes of this paragraph:
(a) "Caregiver" means a person who provides medical or health care assistance to the voter in a residence, nursing care institution, hospice facility, assisted living center, assisted living facility, assisted living home, residential care institution, adult day health care facility or adult foster care home. (b) "Collects" means to gain possession or control of an early ballot. (c) "Family member" means a person who is related to the voter by blood, marriage, adoption or legal guardianship. (d) "Household member" means a person who resides at the same residence as the voter.[3]
” Read the law here.
Yeah, but real care givers can't submit ballots that were already stolen by the DNC. Also, thanks for proving point.
You forgot to put quotes around "evidence".
just order some cheese pizza or twinkies and he’ll be right over
"Click here to donate $25"
2024...
LOL
“No standing.”
We’ve been here before. We need the courts to actually hear the case and see evidence.
Come on Arizona!!
iirc we're now at the point where they'll say the matter is "moot" lol
Lol sure, lawsuits after certification makes total sense. Once it’s certified, judges say “no standing”
This is just more “tick tock”, “kraken”, “two more weeks” bullshit.
if a judge rules in favor of an election challenge I'll eat my hat
🧢🍟🥤
She also said, “we have plenty of votes”. Which I am sure was true but obviously didn’t help.
Keep your champagne cold!
She should have led an armed uprising, but she's a coward that wants the prestige of being governor without the responsibility of actually being a real leader.
No need for that. Peacefully block the 4 highways into Phoenix Metro. Why waste bullets when hunger will do.
Wut
Kari Lake was schooled by the machine like all those who have come before because she believes the system is ultimately fair.
She knew it was unfair. She hoped to beat it.
November 2020 Deja vu
This is what taking back a cheating woman feels like.
Loved this comment.
It's not really a sequel, as much as a spinoff. This time it's "The Copium"
It really would round out well with a closer like that
The Krakening!
Courts: you should have challenged before certification. You can't change anything after
Also courts: You can't challenge before certification, you have to wait until it's official."
TWO MOAR WEEKS!
I hope it ends with a lot of bricks being thrown
I can not believe the same machines that failed in 2020 failed again in 2022!
Without changing anything, I would have expected a totally different outcome!
lol
“moot - it was certified!”
don’t these doofuses ever learn?
2ND AMENDMENT
We all know how this ends.
No not this time. This time it's Kari Lake! She is a fighter! She will save us all. Q was fake but Kari Lake is a real person. We just need to send more money NOW!!
Oh, and make sure you sign up for the newsletter so you never miss an update. Not because we want to sell your information to anyone willing to throw 2 bucks at us.
Until other Arizonans stand with me to protest noting will happen. We need to protest on the freeways.
This is just 2020 but in AZ, nothing is gonna happen. They tried telling us Lake had it won with the outstanding ballots but it didn't happen, and neither will any of these efforts.
Sorry challenges are moot since its already been certified.
Have people learned nothing afted 2020.
I’ll be over here holding my breath.
You are going to hear the courts new catch phrase since 2020, "No standing, dismissed" because it has no legal definition and is left up to the interpretation of the judge.
Stay tuned
This is difficult
Patriots.win:
FIGHT, DONT GIVE UP...
BUT DONT ACTUALLY FIGHT BECAUSE WELL MOCK YOU FOR MUH TWO MORE WEEKS
DO AN ARMED REVOLUTION...
...BUT DONT BECAUSE THATS GLOWY TALK
VOTE!!!
BUT DONT VOTE BECAUSE THE MACHINES ARE RIGGED
DONT TRY TO FIX THE FRAUD THOUGH BECAUSE NOTHING EVER CHANGES
WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO FIX THE FRAUD YOU MUST BE A GRIFTER
WIN LOCAL ELECTIONS AND APPLY FOR POLL WATCHING
BUT THE VOTES ARE FAKE SO IT DOESNT MATTER
WE DIDNT WIN THE SENATE SO NOTHING ELSE MATTERS
GEORGIA MATTERS
BUT GEORGIA DOESNT MATTER BECAUSE ITS ALL RIGGED
...
Jesus Christ Patriots.win, what the actual fuck do you want people to do? There literally isn't anything you won't complain about. The entire site seems rigged to just leave people in a toilet swirl of frustration and inaction. I was wondering why I didn't like coming here that much anymore, and now I know.
I legitimately want to do what works... can anyone actually suggest something useful?
Vote harder next time, of course. Just two more years...2024 will surely be our year. Signal not noise. Release the Kracken. The great Q oracle has surely forseen the next red wave.
Ignore the faggots that call anyone a glowy. They're bots who are here to make sure we stay complacent little bitches.
hopium
The sequel to "Two more Weeks", "Two More Weeks More"!
Where have I heard this before....
As the 2018 GA election was the stress test for the 2020 election, the 2022 AZ, NV, and PA elections are the stress test for 2024. Make no mistake that the citizen response is being closely monitored for the level of pushback that will occur.
LOL. Yeah good luck with that.
Same judges as 2020 probablt as well
At least she's hopeful
We keep rolling along. When can we actually stop this china show?
Its theatre....
claps slowly THEY RUN THE LE-GAL SYS-TEM
Ever notice that when you "win" something in these court challenges...nothing happens? Its because the only time your permitted to win is when there is no consequence.
Remember when all those vaccine mandate cases were won? Remember what came of that..pretty much nothing.
I expect there to be exactly zero consequence to whatever comes of these cases; except for people to be out of money to pay for lawyers.
They will keep doing this shit until the people intervene with more than idle threats and mean tweets.
2018 was the beginning, and the story's getting awfully old.