1690
Comments (120)
sorted by:
85
Purple_Drank 85 points ago +98 / -13

two more weeks!

48
barwhack 48 points ago +52 / -4

Yeah. Now comes moot...

Fraud ruins everything.

32
TexasPiper 32 points ago +37 / -5

No first comes the KRAKEN 🚨 🚨 🚨 🚨

9
Granny 9 points ago +10 / -1

Let's start working on this. I want each of you to think of this term:

VOTER DISENFRANCHISEMENT. Memorize it. Repeat it 10 times. Tell yourself and others that this is the most important political issue from now until it is resolved.

VOTER DISENFRANCHISEMENT.

VOTER DISENFRANCHISEMENT.

VOTER DISENFRANCHISEMENT.

VOTER DISENFRANCHISEMENT.

VOTER DISENFRANCHISEMENT.

Say it with me:

VOTER DISENFRANCHISEMENT.

11
Kornilovist 11 points ago +11 / -0

Fraud.

Just say fraud.

Or better yet,

Say tyranny.

7
Ocineaa 7 points ago +9 / -2

Lolol. I'd forgotten about Powell. She suspected real quick

4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
3
BigIgloo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Or start to shoot

15
Pukeahontas 15 points ago +15 / -0

Before certification, you can’t challenge election results because they are not official

After certification, you can’t challenge results because YOU HAVE NO STANDING

It’s so simple

10
BillionsAndBillions 10 points ago +11 / -1

No standing before certification because you aren't harmed yet. Moot afterwards because the election is over.

7
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 7 points ago +7 / -0

Correct. We saw this movie in 2020. First comes "no standing", followed by "moot".

27
Genji_Sama 27 points ago +29 / -2

I don't want to be a doomer but holy hell, did anyone actually think something would happen?

22
WWG0N3WGA 22 points ago +23 / -1

The only thing I know for sure is you can get a pillow on sale

1
Genji_Sama 1 point ago +2 / -1

Wait there's another sale? Honestly I didn't think the My pillow I bought was the best pillow ever, but I'd buy another one with a based sounding promo code

16
ppler 16 points ago +16 / -0

This assertion is factually correct. Arizona has specific laws for challenging a certified election. 16-671 through 16-678

ANY voter can file a "statement of contest" which is effectively an affidavit that says "statement of contest" at the top of the page. This can be filed by any voter in any county. We have 5 days from today for everyone to convert their affidavit to a "statement of contest".

12
ppler 12 points ago +12 / -0

16-672

A. Any elector of the state may contest the election of any person declared elected to a state office, or declared nominated to a state office at a primary election, or the declared result of an initiated or referred measure, or a proposal to amend the Constitution of Arizona, or other question or proposal submitted to vote of the people, upon any of the following grounds:

  1. That the person whose right to the office is contested was not at the time of the election eligible to the office.

  2. That the person whose right is contested, or any person acting for him, has given to an elector, inspector, judge or clerk of election, a bribe or reward, or has offered such bribe or reward for the purpose of procuring his election, or has committed any other offense against the elective franchise.

  3. On account of illegal votes.

  4. That by reason of erroneous count of votes the person declared elected or the initiative or referred measure, or proposal to amend the constitution, or other question or proposal submitted, which has been declared carried, did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for the office or a sufficient number of votes to carry the measure, amendment, question or proposal.

B. The contest may be brought in the superior court of the county in which the person contesting resides or in the superior court of Maricopa county.

C. In a contest of the election of a person declared elected to a state office or of an initiated or referred measure, constitutional amendment, or other question or proposal, which has been declared carried, the attorney general may intervene, and upon demand, the place of trial of the contest shall be changed to Maricopa county, if commenced in another county.

9
ppler 9 points ago +9 / -0

16-673

A. The elector contesting a state election shall, within five days after completion of the canvass of the election and declaration of the result thereof by the secretary of state or by the governor, file in the court in which the contest is commenced a statement in writing setting forth:

  1. The name of the person whose right to the office is contested, or the title of the measure, or constitutional amendment, or other proposition as it appeared upon the official ballot.

  2. The office the election to which is contested.

  3. The particular grounds of the contest.

B. The statement shall be verified by the affidavit of the contestor that he believes the matters and things therein contained are true.

7
ppler 7 points ago +7 / -0

16-675 tl;dr you can pay for a ballot inspection if you think it's critical for your contest evidence, loser pays expenses.

16-676

A. In any contest brought under the provisions of section 16-672 or 16-674, upon the filing of the answer, or if no answer is filed, upon the expiration of the time specified in the summons, the court shall set a time for the hearing of the contest, not later than ten days after the date on which the statement of contest was filed, which may be continued for not to exceed five days for good cause shown.

C. If in an election contest it appears that a person other than the contestee has the highest number of legal votes, the court shall declare that person elected and that the certificate of election of the person whose office is contested is of no further legal force or effect.

Don't put this all on Kari Lake ANY voter can file a challenge in their county court.

5
Bennythejoke 5 points ago +5 / -0

Every MAGA person in Arizona should be filing this paperwork, if I am understanding this correctly. or at least sign a petition of some kind getting this on the docket.

3
Genji_Sama 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks, for the info. Anything someone outside Arizona can do besides watch and wait?

10
Keiichi81 10 points ago +11 / -1

Being a "doomer" just means you're paying attention and capable of recognizing patterns. At some point people need to start acknowledging that blind naive optimism isn't a winning strategy. In fact, all it seems to do is placate people into not taking to the streets.

4
Ralphusthegreatus 4 points ago +5 / -1

It's called being a realist.

1
pepe_lover 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/brazil-military-kills-red-command-cartel-leaders-prepares-take/

What's happening in post election Brazil?

MILITARY IS THE ONLY WAY....

View 1 more comment
6
DickTick 6 points ago +7 / -1

At least she's fighting

-1
idrago01 -1 points ago +1 / -2

for donations

5
disgruntled_patriot 5 points ago +5 / -0

tRuzT teH PLaAaaAAaNnnNn!!11!!!11!

2
FromSethWithLove 2 points ago +2 / -0

I will wait one fortnight

0
idrago01 0 points ago +1 / -1

no no two fortnights

View 6 more comments
35
fartglove 35 points ago +38 / -3

Start working that recall angle. Get that evidence now so you can do something in 6 months. We know aint shit happening in the courts. Gather the signatures and addresses, get the approval by overwhelming the system with signatures, then go back to those addresses to harvest those ballots.

AZ allows for a recall. Edit: paging Scott Pressler :D

17
FLYWHEEL_PRIME 17 points ago +28 / -11

Get that evidence now so you can do something in 6 months

Oh look!! We've graduated from 2 weeks to 6 months!!

You fucking people 🤣

1
nozonozo 1 point ago +2 / -1

There is no recourse to be had in the courts.

Hold a massive Trumpish rally and get a based judge to swear in Kari Lake as governor on the same day as Hobbs does.

1
DickTick 1 point ago +4 / -3

I'm sorry, we forgot the best plan was to just give up and roll over and let the commies have their way with us with no fight at all.....

We definitely know which side of fight or flight you fall on, Soylent Soldier!

-6
fartglove -6 points ago +2 / -8

Its getting easier to spot the accounts that are only here to change the subject. ADL send you? Accounts like this are not likely Trump supporting accounts or even backed by an actual human....OR the human is working other accounts at the same time (that is how replies like this get any upvotes).

6
BoatingAccident 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think they get upvotes because most of the people here feel the same way. You know. Like we are tax slaves to globalist pedophiles who never seem to pay any consequences for their crimes…. Unless I missed the Gitmo hearings? Excuse me now while I wrestle a kraken and go back to trusting the plan!

-1
fartglove -1 points ago +1 / -2

What plan? That is just nonsense. There was never a plan because the ability to leverage the plan is not available. AZ does have a recall process. Either AZ actually has more republicans or they dont. If they have way way more then getting the signatures should be pretty easy...the evidence is in the twitter files. Or just do nothing.

1
BigIgloo 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is a third hole

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
-6
fartglove -6 points ago +1 / -7

that is a lot of extra o's there. Does the ADL pay by the o? Do you get more if you type in all caps?

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
0
McConnellEndorsement 0 points ago +1 / -1

Just give up. These people are weak. I'm guessing only around 20% of us actually want to fix this problem instead of waiting 2 more weeks.

2
KrinklePanda 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ballot harvesting is illegal in AZ, you can only submit ballots for members of your household. The reason Dems get away with it is because they are considering dorms, nursing homes, and halfway houses/homeless shelters a "household" but only Dems are allowed to define their household. I dare any else to try it.

0
fartglove 0 points ago +1 / -1

Bottom section regarding the definition of "Caregiver". No Republicans in nursing homes anymore? Maybe some Republican kids should check on their parents/relatives in a nursing home and see how it was handled. Seems legal to me.

Arizona Arizona permits a family member, household member, or caregiver to return a voter's absentee ballot. It establishes the collection of early ballots by anyone outside those groups as a class 6 felony. The law states the following:

“ H. A person who knowingly collects voted or unvoted early ballots from another person is guilty of a class 6 felony. An election official, a United States postal service worker or any other person who is allowed by law to transmit United States mail is deemed not to have collected an early ballot if the official, worker or other person is engaged in official duties.

I. Subsection H of this section does not apply to: ...

A family member, household member or caregiver of the voter. For the purposes of this paragraph:

(a) "Caregiver" means a person who provides medical or health care assistance to the voter in a residence, nursing care institution, hospice facility, assisted living center, assisted living facility, assisted living home, residential care institution, adult day health care facility or adult foster care home. (b) "Collects" means to gain possession or control of an early ballot. (c) "Family member" means a person who is related to the voter by blood, marriage, adoption or legal guardianship. (d) "Household member" means a person who resides at the same residence as the voter.[3]

” Read the law here.

1
KrinklePanda 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, but real care givers can't submit ballots that were already stolen by the DNC. Also, thanks for proving point.

1
45ForEver2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

You forgot to put quotes around "evidence".

0
idrago01 0 points ago +1 / -1

just order some cheese pizza or twinkies and he’ll be right over

23
Mayhem 23 points ago +25 / -2

"Click here to donate $25"

21
deleted 21 points ago +22 / -1
3
Epstein_was_MOSSAD 3 points ago +4 / -1

2024...

LOL

20
Joeret 20 points ago +20 / -0

“No standing.”

We’ve been here before. We need the courts to actually hear the case and see evidence.

Come on Arizona!!

8
RestingDickface 8 points ago +8 / -0

iirc we're now at the point where they'll say the matter is "moot" lol

15
vote_for_MAGA_2020 15 points ago +18 / -3

Lol sure, lawsuits after certification makes total sense. Once it’s certified, judges say “no standing”

This is just more “tick tock”, “kraken”, “two more weeks” bullshit.

14
Fussbudget 14 points ago +14 / -0

if a judge rules in favor of an election challenge I'll eat my hat

4
MAGA_Toaster 4 points ago +5 / -1

🧢🍟🥤

13
ThisTrainHasNoBrakes 13 points ago +13 / -0

She also said, “we have plenty of votes”. Which I am sure was true but obviously didn’t help.

5
toasty867 5 points ago +5 / -0

Keep your champagne cold!

-10
Global_Tornado -10 points ago +5 / -15

She should have led an armed uprising, but she's a coward that wants the prestige of being governor without the responsibility of actually being a real leader.

2
KrinklePanda 2 points ago +2 / -0

No need for that. Peacefully block the 4 highways into Phoenix Metro. Why waste bullets when hunger will do.

-1
DickTick -1 points ago +1 / -2

Wut

11
mrmrmrj 11 points ago +11 / -0

Kari Lake was schooled by the machine like all those who have come before because she believes the system is ultimately fair.

4
BoatingAccident 4 points ago +4 / -0

She knew it was unfair. She hoped to beat it.

10
Caliblanco 10 points ago +10 / -0

November 2020 Deja vu

This is what taking back a cheating woman feels like.

1
Ralphusthegreatus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Loved this comment.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
4
PM_ME_UR_VIVOZ 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's not really a sequel, as much as a spinoff. This time it's "The Copium"

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
PM_ME_UR_VIVOZ 2 points ago +2 / -0

It really would round out well with a closer like that

2
BillionsAndBillions 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Krakening!

6
JuicyfearsMAGA 6 points ago +6 / -0

Courts: you should have challenged before certification. You can't change anything after

4
AbrahamLincoln 4 points ago +4 / -0

Also courts: You can't challenge before certification, you have to wait until it's official."

5
Wordlife187 5 points ago +6 / -1

TWO MOAR WEEKS!

5
sweeswee14 5 points ago +6 / -1

I hope it ends with a lot of bricks being thrown

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
5
Pepbrandt 5 points ago +5 / -0

I can not believe the same machines that failed in 2020 failed again in 2022!

2
BigIgloo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Without changing anything, I would have expected a totally different outcome!

4
Quixotic 4 points ago +4 / -0

lol

“moot - it was certified!”

don’t these doofuses ever learn?

2ND AMENDMENT

4
Briankitis 4 points ago +6 / -2

We all know how this ends.

1
Ralphusthegreatus 1 point ago +3 / -2

No not this time. This time it's Kari Lake! She is a fighter! She will save us all. Q was fake but Kari Lake is a real person. We just need to send more money NOW!!

Oh, and make sure you sign up for the newsletter so you never miss an update. Not because we want to sell your information to anyone willing to throw 2 bucks at us.

4
KrinklePanda 4 points ago +4 / -0
  1. Dismissed for lack of standing before certification.
  2. Dismissed as moot after certification.

Until other Arizonans stand with me to protest noting will happen. We need to protest on the freeways.

4
clipk0 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is just 2020 but in AZ, nothing is gonna happen. They tried telling us Lake had it won with the outstanding ballots but it didn't happen, and neither will any of these efforts.

3
RedPillosopher1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sorry challenges are moot since its already been certified.

Have people learned nothing afted 2020.

3
Dallasguy 3 points ago +5 / -2

I’ll be over here holding my breath.

2
litotes 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are going to hear the courts new catch phrase since 2020, "No standing, dismissed" because it has no legal definition and is left up to the interpretation of the judge.

2
LatitudeofMind 2 points ago +2 / -0

Stay tuned

This is difficult

2
DaveMastor 2 points ago +2 / -0

Patriots.win:

FIGHT, DONT GIVE UP...

BUT DONT ACTUALLY FIGHT BECAUSE WELL MOCK YOU FOR MUH TWO MORE WEEKS

DO AN ARMED REVOLUTION...

...BUT DONT BECAUSE THATS GLOWY TALK

VOTE!!!

BUT DONT VOTE BECAUSE THE MACHINES ARE RIGGED

DONT TRY TO FIX THE FRAUD THOUGH BECAUSE NOTHING EVER CHANGES

WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO FIX THE FRAUD YOU MUST BE A GRIFTER

WIN LOCAL ELECTIONS AND APPLY FOR POLL WATCHING

BUT THE VOTES ARE FAKE SO IT DOESNT MATTER

WE DIDNT WIN THE SENATE SO NOTHING ELSE MATTERS

GEORGIA MATTERS

BUT GEORGIA DOESNT MATTER BECAUSE ITS ALL RIGGED

...

Jesus Christ Patriots.win, what the actual fuck do you want people to do? There literally isn't anything you won't complain about. The entire site seems rigged to just leave people in a toilet swirl of frustration and inaction. I was wondering why I didn't like coming here that much anymore, and now I know.

I legitimately want to do what works... can anyone actually suggest something useful?

0
Demokraut_No_More 0 points ago +1 / -1

Vote harder next time, of course. Just two more years...2024 will surely be our year. Signal not noise. Release the Kracken. The great Q oracle has surely forseen the next red wave.

0
McConnellEndorsement 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ignore the faggots that call anyone a glowy. They're bots who are here to make sure we stay complacent little bitches.

2
JoePlumber 2 points ago +3 / -1

hopium

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
AbrahamLincoln 2 points ago +3 / -1

The sequel to "Two more Weeks", "Two More Weeks More"!

1
BigIgloo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where have I heard this before....

1
PeteScylla 1 point ago +1 / -0

As the 2018 GA election was the stress test for the 2020 election, the 2022 AZ, NV, and PA elections are the stress test for 2024. Make no mistake that the citizen response is being closely monitored for the level of pushback that will occur.

1
yodayoda 1 point ago +1 / -0

LOL. Yeah good luck with that.

1
SaveUsSCOTUS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same judges as 2020 probablt as well

1
baddream 1 point ago +1 / -0

At least she's hopeful

1
FriendofTRUMP 1 point ago +1 / -0

We keep rolling along. When can we actually stop this china show?

1
Klaus73 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its theatre....

claps slowly THEY RUN THE LE-GAL SYS-TEM

Ever notice that when you "win" something in these court challenges...nothing happens? Its because the only time your permitted to win is when there is no consequence.

Remember when all those vaccine mandate cases were won? Remember what came of that..pretty much nothing.

I expect there to be exactly zero consequence to whatever comes of these cases; except for people to be out of money to pay for lawyers.

1
Hambeast-1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

They will keep doing this shit until the people intervene with more than idle threats and mean tweets.

1
Hugh 1 point ago +1 / -0

2018 was the beginning, and the story's getting awfully old.

View 9 more comments