In science, a law is a theory that has been tested such that it fails no metric of reason. We both know that it works and can express why, at least in the context of all available means of reasonable testing.
You don’t know what you’re talking about. A law is not a higher level of understanding than a theory. You’re getting that misnomer from morons who try to say evolution is “just” a theory. A law is a basic model that is known to work. They are usually limited in scope and there isn’t much beyond empiricism behind them. They will not be able to predict the discovery of things like a Fresnel spot. Only a true theory can do such.
If you really think you’re right, show me a physics law that is higher than a related physics theory. Something where it went from theory to law. And don’t just give the name, give the model, the math if you will.
In science, a law is a theory that has been tested such that it fails no metric of reason. We both know that it works and can express why, at least in the context of all available means of reasonable testing.
You don’t know what you’re talking about. A law is not a higher level of understanding than a theory. You’re getting that misnomer from morons who try to say evolution is “just” a theory. A law is a basic model that is known to work. They are usually limited in scope and there isn’t much beyond empiricism behind them. They will not be able to predict the discovery of things like a Fresnel spot. Only a true theory can do such.
If you really think you’re right, show me a physics law that is higher than a related physics theory. Something where it went from theory to law. And don’t just give the name, give the model, the math if you will.