I think there’s definitely places for religious liberty in areas where they’re being forced into performing an action. The left only sees the flip side, religious liberty to impose an action.
I don’t necessarily agree with the last part either, but fully support the first one. There’s a huge difference between saying “sorry, I can’t do that for you,” and electroshocking the straight back into the gays.
The first should always be protected, IMO, unless there’s extreme extenuating circumstances.
Being gay does not exist outside of a sexual fetish.
Think for one moment what being born gay means. It means a child has the blue print to stick his dick in poop. You really want me to believe that a child, born, who wont even know what sex is for 13ish years already has the gay set in them? Nah bruh.
Why do they claim sexual fluidity? Because being a sodomite is a FETISH that fluidly changes like every other FETISH when you get bored of it
Thanks for the cogent & concise argument against “they’re born that way, why’d anyone willingly put themselves through the scrutiny?” I should’ve already thought of this instead of trying to explain it away as they were more than likely sexually abused or other Enviornmental factors, that probably explains a lot, but fetishes are a thing too, people used to not be so blatant about.
Look to my other comments. Atrizine, the second most used pesticide; BPA and phthalates disrupting endocrine; the Pill and estrogen in the water supply; synthetic musks and aluminium in deodorant and soaps. If you think anyone is naturally wired and lobotomized at these levels never before seen in history then I suggest you start reading
Julius Caesar was gay... were there phthlates back then? Hitler was gay, were phthaltes the reason he hung out w Hugo Boss and Ernst Rohm all day? The Bush family are sexual deviants, does this apply to them?
Yes. The Egyptians and Bablyonians knew how and why these ancient chemicals affected people. Lead, copper, aluminium side-effects were as well known then as they are today.
Look to the Praetorian guard and how they 'handled' a string of emperors. Look to the makeup that helped Elizabeth 1 remain barren. All these things were known to the 'court' handlers. If you want a good idea of how this works, think of Jaffar having the ear of the king in the Disney Aladdin movie. Jaffar enchanted the ruler, became the court reporter who reported 'news' to the people' and all the while became puppet master threatening the hereditary line of kings in order to breed himself into it.
Even in the Bible it speaks of Eunuchs - it was very well known how to castrate a man's lust for women so that he could be in charge and trusted with a king's harem. Don't fool yourself that in 'modern' times we know different things than the ancients - these are old tricks being used again and again.
Julius Caesar was maybe experimental, but def. not gay, given his rather famous flings (including Cleopatra).
Hitler was more into down-low daddy-fetish in his relationships and preferred fucking teenaged girls (two of whom were his cousins). Even Eva Braun was favored because she had little-girl like features, and behaved like one around him.
Also, as sibling post mentions, hell yeah the Ancients imbibed some dangerous chemicals - for instance, the mid- and upper-class Romans drank water from pipes made directly from lead (which, as you can imagine, does some real not-fun shit to one's brain.)
Finally, yep, there were fags and pedoes back in the day - the Greeks were widely derided for being "boy lovers".
Was it genetic? Probably not... any civilization that has a big increase in leisure time tends to do stupid shit, will (which is why all that gay shit happened among the upper classes, and def. not among slaves and the poor, all of whom were too busy trying to stay fed and housed to worry much about finding new and interesting places to put their dicks. The few who partook did so to get some wealth and power by using their bodies - or the bodies of one of their kids - as some rich dude's plaything.)
Leave Greece or Rome and go to a subsistence culture like, say, the early Mongols or Celts? Suddenly everyone's too busy trying to stay alive and make children to play Alphabet-People Games.
There have been studies done on identical twins to determine whether or not sexual preference (perversion) is genetic and the answer is unequivocally no. It's a learned trait based on environmental factors.
I agree this is fetishism I don't really care about the details. I once supported getting the government out of the bedroom and I still do. Now I demand the bedroom is taken out of the government, permanently, and this wholesale sexual assault on our citizenry is prosecuted as criminal.
I agree with you for the 99.9%, but I do believe there are people born with mental illnesses that believe doing, and participating in all kinds of strange, and disgusting shit is acceptable NOT JUST sodomy. Maybe it’s a fetish created by a mental illness/birth defect in those .1%. With that said, those are the EETTRs, and not the norm. Most is learned behavior from psychological/physical abuse by far.
I agree, but I wonder if brain abnormalities/mental illness from birth cause some people to gravitate towards certain behaviors more often even without “nurture” getting involved. I definitely believe our current environmental variables definitely make things worse including mOOdern diets, and eDuCaTiOn among other things.
If they keep their sodomy, and “adult fetishes” in the privacy of their own homes, and stop flaunting it, and pushing it onto others including abusing, and grooming children there wouldn’t be nearly as big of an issue/problem. “We” gave them an inch, and they took a mile of dicks up their asses while expecting us, and our children to do the same. Now they get no acceptance or tolerance, straight to the woodchippers they go if they publicly display their deviancy, degeneracy, and depravity.
Next you'll be saying kill autistic children that your doctors created with aluminum injections. You all stand around while mothers eat food covered in atrizine and take the pill, which fucks up fetal hormones. You really think any kid or man wants to be wired this way?
They've killed my uncles on both sides of the great wars, then they poisoned my parents with 'food' and 'pharma'. Atrizine and the pill have fucked up our hormonal development. Grow your own food and also don't let your kids be lobotomized by fluoride and soft plastics.
Until you take a stand against what's causing generations of Christian men and women to be abused like this by our 'rulers' then screw off with the woodchipper nonsense
I actually agree with you, and the ‘ones’ you speak off. They shouldn’t even get the woodchippers because that would be way to quick, and kind.
Until you take a stand
Take a stand for who, and what though?!? The great experiment was subverted, and failed long before we were born. There is no saving it now. There is only leveling it, and attempt rebuilding something better while correcting the mistakes our much too kind forefathers made, or nothing at all.
Once I saw how accepting many of my fellow “conservatives” were of the masks, and clotshots, I quickly learned that we are still far from the point where this ship is worth even attempting to save, if it ever will be, which with each passing day, I no longer believe it is. The unfortunate part is that, as always throughout history, many good will suffer with the bad, and that includes me, and many others here.
If they keep their sodomy, and “adult fetishes” in the privacy of their own homes, and stop flaunting it, and pushing it onto others including abusing, and grooming children there wouldn’t be nearly as big of an issue/problem.
They've already proven they won't stop.
Now they get no acceptance or tolerance, straight to the woodchippers they go if they publicly display their deviancy, degeneracy, and depravity.
If they keep their sodomy, and “adult fetishes” in the privacy of their own homes, and stop flaunting it, and pushing it onto others including abusing, and grooming children there wouldn’t be nearly as big of an issue/problem.
"Pride" prevented that, and took it far beyond just being gay. Unless you ban "Pride", it will 100% lead to grooming children. Every time.
Let he who is without sin turn on the wood chipper.
But if you are found to be with unrepentant sin, you will be the first into the wood chipper for your lies.
I'm fine condemning pedophiles because it's an issue of protecting the defenseless. But anyone who is engaging in only consentual adult (children cannot consent) sex is not a predator of the weak. They are only enslaving themselves. Jesus can set them free.
Can you point to the line in the Constitution where it says that it is ok to be gay? Can you show that to me? How about the line that says it is ok to groom kids? I haven't seen either of those.
However I believe the document you are looking for is the Bill of Rights, not the Constitution. Even then can you show me where it says the above? Cause I don't see any form of sexual depravity listed.
As for my belief in said documents, yes I believe in them, just not the system that has been bastardized around them by turning those documents into swiss cheese.
Anyone giving dubious medical treatments for any reason, without the express and informed consent of the patient, should be treated as a criminal.
I do not care if you think someone deserves death. If you want to impose death or injury, you should be comfortable dealing it publicly and explicitly. Don't hide behind doctors to implement your moral standards. If you believe in them, you can stand by them publicly. Where are you going? You don't want your church to know about your views on this?
Don't be - the justices often love to play devils advocate and wax on about all these various hypothetical scenarios... it's rarely an indicator of how they vote.
They think it makes them look smart and intellectual. Thomas is the only one who understands what it means to hear an oral argument.
If they don’t cuck, it will only be about religion because that’s all they ever let us have (sometimes). Of course, people like me who aren’t religious still have NO RIGHTS! Thanks, Gorcuck! Thanks for fucking America once again!
A bunch of libs have been moving to Mexico due to the lower cost of living and them being able to work from home. They're now complaining about the lack of diversity. In Mexico.
Yup, but you'd be surprised a shit ton of homeless from the East Coast, Dem cities, were sending them out there with a years rent then nothing. So after weed legalized the Left Coast faggots came, then 2 years later the homeless.
Left in 2016. I complained about all the homeless camps off I-225 and I couldn't tell you how many people irl on here (back as The Donald) "I don't see camps!" LOOK AROUND, PAY ATTENTION! Checking nextdoor, homeless situation 6 years later- they inhabit suburban streets...
A just verdict would be for Colorado to lose a seat in Congress, a seat in the Senate and two electoral votes for the same amount of time that Jack Philips was bullied by the state of Colorado.
If CO complains that it is unconstitutional - explain that so was their treatment of Jack, and they didn't mind that at all.
The Californians that you speak of that are now ruining CO and ID and Austin are not native Californians. They are like a horde of locusts that have invaded from New England and the East coast. They have no ties here, no history here.
Call them what they are, cosmopolitan migrants that move from city to city leaving ruin in their wake.
First they destroyed the rust belt in the 70s and 80s, then they came out here to do their thing and now that mission has been accomplished they have moved on to Boise, Denver, Boulder and Austin to start anew.
Again, study after study is showing that Californians moving to ID, WY, and MT are more right wing than the average in that state and make the state vote more Republican.
Native Montana Republicans: "Perhaps drag shows for kids aren't bad..."
Transplant Montana Republicans from California: "DRIVE OUT THE DEGENERATES! DEUS VULT!"
Yeah keep blaming "DAH CALIFORNIUNS" for your own state's piss poor political participation amongst conservatives. Y'all so busy being "left alone" that you're forgetting to go out and protect your freedoms.
I guarantee you... if I move from CA, I am NOT voting blue wherever I'm moving... BUT I AM VOTING!
[the cake baker in Masterpiece Cakeshop] had to go through a reeducation program, did he not?
Right from the SCOTUS. I'll add to this: every "diversity and inclusion" role in corporate America is discriminatory by default and a political officer working for the Democrats - no exception, every one of them. This is beyond fucking illegal and they pushed this on us all. The "reeducation" goes right along with these roles.
nonono that's not what it was. It was propaganda about an unconstitutional law denying him his RIGHT to refuse to do business with any customer for any reason. It's not "discrimination".
Behavioral (homosexuality) genetics is a weak science and not predictive. The best way to study genetics is with identical twins who share the exact DNA. There are twins where one is homo and the other hetero. This means there is something outside of biology causing this behavior.
Go into the city and demand that every liberal bake shop make you a Trump cake or a "Straight Pride" cake. Guarantee you will be kicked out of the store, beaten by Antifa and then arrested by faggot LE.
Another way of saying training to educate a person on the law, is called re-education. The law does not say whether or not a person has to accept same sex marriage, nor does it say that people who don't agree with same sex marriage have to be forced into servitude for that which they disagree with.
I was pleasantly surprised to hear the defense of religious beliefs.
I think there’s definitely places for religious liberty in areas where they’re being forced into performing an action. The left only sees the flip side, religious liberty to impose an action.
I don’t necessarily agree with the last part either, but fully support the first one. There’s a huge difference between saying “sorry, I can’t do that for you,” and electroshocking the straight back into the gays.
The first should always be protected, IMO, unless there’s extreme extenuating circumstances.
Being gay does not exist outside of a sexual fetish.
Think for one moment what being born gay means. It means a child has the blue print to stick his dick in poop. You really want me to believe that a child, born, who wont even know what sex is for 13ish years already has the gay set in them? Nah bruh.
Why do they claim sexual fluidity? Because being a sodomite is a FETISH that fluidly changes like every other FETISH when you get bored of it
Thanks for the cogent & concise argument against “they’re born that way, why’d anyone willingly put themselves through the scrutiny?” I should’ve already thought of this instead of trying to explain it away as they were more than likely sexually abused or other Enviornmental factors, that probably explains a lot, but fetishes are a thing too, people used to not be so blatant about.
Agree. “Born that way” makes no sense from an evolutionary standpoint. If homosexuality was genetic, it would would be phased out naturally.
Look to my other comments. Atrizine, the second most used pesticide; BPA and phthalates disrupting endocrine; the Pill and estrogen in the water supply; synthetic musks and aluminium in deodorant and soaps. If you think anyone is naturally wired and lobotomized at these levels never before seen in history then I suggest you start reading
Julius Caesar was gay... were there phthlates back then? Hitler was gay, were phthaltes the reason he hung out w Hugo Boss and Ernst Rohm all day? The Bush family are sexual deviants, does this apply to them?
Yes. The Egyptians and Bablyonians knew how and why these ancient chemicals affected people. Lead, copper, aluminium side-effects were as well known then as they are today.
Look to the Praetorian guard and how they 'handled' a string of emperors. Look to the makeup that helped Elizabeth 1 remain barren. All these things were known to the 'court' handlers. If you want a good idea of how this works, think of Jaffar having the ear of the king in the Disney Aladdin movie. Jaffar enchanted the ruler, became the court reporter who reported 'news' to the people' and all the while became puppet master threatening the hereditary line of kings in order to breed himself into it.
Even in the Bible it speaks of Eunuchs - it was very well known how to castrate a man's lust for women so that he could be in charge and trusted with a king's harem. Don't fool yourself that in 'modern' times we know different things than the ancients - these are old tricks being used again and again.
Julius Caesar was maybe experimental, but def. not gay, given his rather famous flings (including Cleopatra).
Hitler was more into down-low daddy-fetish in his relationships and preferred fucking teenaged girls (two of whom were his cousins). Even Eva Braun was favored because she had little-girl like features, and behaved like one around him.
Also, as sibling post mentions, hell yeah the Ancients imbibed some dangerous chemicals - for instance, the mid- and upper-class Romans drank water from pipes made directly from lead (which, as you can imagine, does some real not-fun shit to one's brain.)
Finally, yep, there were fags and pedoes back in the day - the Greeks were widely derided for being "boy lovers".
Was it genetic? Probably not... any civilization that has a big increase in leisure time tends to do stupid shit, will (which is why all that gay shit happened among the upper classes, and def. not among slaves and the poor, all of whom were too busy trying to stay fed and housed to worry much about finding new and interesting places to put their dicks. The few who partook did so to get some wealth and power by using their bodies - or the bodies of one of their kids - as some rich dude's plaything.)
Leave Greece or Rome and go to a subsistence culture like, say, the early Mongols or Celts? Suddenly everyone's too busy trying to stay alive and make children to play Alphabet-People Games.
There have been studies done on identical twins to determine whether or not sexual preference (perversion) is genetic and the answer is unequivocally no. It's a learned trait based on environmental factors.
That's not how genetics work.
Genes don't always work that way. Faggot male has sister who's just a carrier of the gene has kids, gene lives on
Not saying there is a gay gene, but the "genetic dead end" argument doesn't work to disprove it
https://c-hit.org/2022/02/21/poll-21-of-generation-z-self-identify-as-lgbtq/
I agree this is fetishism I don't really care about the details. I once supported getting the government out of the bedroom and I still do. Now I demand the bedroom is taken out of the government, permanently, and this wholesale sexual assault on our citizenry is prosecuted as criminal.
Identical gay/straight twins exist, which disproves gay at birth. Can't have the same genetic code and different sexuality.
Yes, a gay gene has not been found
What's the difference between a fetish and what they're saying?
I agree with you for the 99.9%, but I do believe there are people born with mental illnesses that believe doing, and participating in all kinds of strange, and disgusting shit is acceptable NOT JUST sodomy. Maybe it’s a fetish created by a mental illness/birth defect in those .1%. With that said, those are the EETTRs, and not the norm. Most is learned behavior from psychological/physical abuse by far.
Environment affects it like every fetish, hence a fetish
I agree, but I wonder if brain abnormalities/mental illness from birth cause some people to gravitate towards certain behaviors more often even without “nurture” getting involved. I definitely believe our current environmental variables definitely make things worse including mOOdern diets, and eDuCaTiOn among other things.
I am all for this as well, or wood chippers since they are mostly pedos anyways.
If they keep their sodomy, and “adult fetishes” in the privacy of their own homes, and stop flaunting it, and pushing it onto others including abusing, and grooming children there wouldn’t be nearly as big of an issue/problem. “We” gave them an inch, and they took a mile of dicks up their asses while expecting us, and our children to do the same. Now they get no acceptance or tolerance, straight to the woodchippers they go if they publicly display their deviancy, degeneracy, and depravity.
I agree 100%
(and don't forget dogs as well)
🤢
Next you'll be saying kill autistic children that your doctors created with aluminum injections. You all stand around while mothers eat food covered in atrizine and take the pill, which fucks up fetal hormones. You really think any kid or man wants to be wired this way?
They've killed my uncles on both sides of the great wars, then they poisoned my parents with 'food' and 'pharma'. Atrizine and the pill have fucked up our hormonal development. Grow your own food and also don't let your kids be lobotomized by fluoride and soft plastics.
Until you take a stand against what's causing generations of Christian men and women to be abused like this by our 'rulers' then screw off with the woodchipper nonsense
I actually agree with you, and the ‘ones’ you speak off. They shouldn’t even get the woodchippers because that would be way to quick, and kind.
Take a stand for who, and what though?!? The great experiment was subverted, and failed long before we were born. There is no saving it now. There is only leveling it, and attempt rebuilding something better while correcting the mistakes our much too kind forefathers made, or nothing at all.
Once I saw how accepting many of my fellow “conservatives” were of the masks, and clotshots, I quickly learned that we are still far from the point where this ship is worth even attempting to save, if it ever will be, which with each passing day, I no longer believe it is. The unfortunate part is that, as always throughout history, many good will suffer with the bad, and that includes me, and many others here.
They've already proven they won't stop.
Atta boy
Yup yup
"Pride" prevented that, and took it far beyond just being gay. Unless you ban "Pride", it will 100% lead to grooming children. Every time.
Let he who is without sin turn on the wood chipper.
But if you are found to be with unrepentant sin, you will be the first into the wood chipper for your lies.
I'm fine condemning pedophiles because it's an issue of protecting the defenseless. But anyone who is engaging in only consentual adult (children cannot consent) sex is not a predator of the weak. They are only enslaving themselves. Jesus can set them free.
So, I guess you don't believe in the Constitution. Don't pretend that you do.
Can you point to the line in the Constitution where it says that it is ok to be gay? Can you show that to me? How about the line that says it is ok to groom kids? I haven't seen either of those.
However I believe the document you are looking for is the Bill of Rights, not the Constitution. Even then can you show me where it says the above? Cause I don't see any form of sexual depravity listed.
As for my belief in said documents, yes I believe in them, just not the system that has been bastardized around them by turning those documents into swiss cheese.
Anyone giving dubious medical treatments for any reason, without the express and informed consent of the patient, should be treated as a criminal.
I do not care if you think someone deserves death. If you want to impose death or injury, you should be comfortable dealing it publicly and explicitly. Don't hide behind doctors to implement your moral standards. If you believe in them, you can stand by them publicly. Where are you going? You don't want your church to know about your views on this?
Why not electroshock the gays. Would definitely help them
Because electroshock "therapy" is as effective in helping as the Covid "vaccines".
If your goal is to kill sinners, you can be sure that we have dirt on you. Jesus knows all things.
Don't be - the justices often love to play devils advocate and wax on about all these various hypothetical scenarios... it's rarely an indicator of how they vote.
They think it makes them look smart and intellectual. Thomas is the only one who understands what it means to hear an oral argument.
So they are all Senator Joe Biden mini-mes.
Looking at their history it will be a 6:3 decision in favor of religious freedom.
Wonder how the diversity hire is going to vote.
Looking at your history, you couldn't accurately predict the winner of a one man race.
Keep screeching retarded nonsense
Stop crying.
Pure projection
... is what you are known for, yes.
just wait till "not a biologist" one gets to ask questions, it'll be the opposite.
If they don’t cuck, it will only be about religion because that’s all they ever let us have (sometimes). Of course, people like me who aren’t religious still have NO RIGHTS! Thanks, Gorcuck! Thanks for fucking America once again!
Gorsuch is my new favorite. Very strong on separation of powers. Free expression might be another one.
Cucked Colorado
I left that fucking state, all those fucking commiepornians moving in.
So did I, the same thing is happening in my current state now. Can't keep moving, stay in one place and fight.
I support the law enforcement of Laramie County Wyoming and their war against greenies
MARTIANS? WHERE?
AZ? Yep, all the soy fucks. It's too bad they can't move to another LA shithole full of diversity to enjoy or why not Mexico itself?
A bunch of libs have been moving to Mexico due to the lower cost of living and them being able to work from home. They're now complaining about the lack of diversity. In Mexico.
NV
Oh, I'm fucking stealing "Commiepornia" and replacing my well-worn "Commiefornia"
Yup, but you'd be surprised a shit ton of homeless from the East Coast, Dem cities, were sending them out there with a years rent then nothing. So after weed legalized the Left Coast faggots came, then 2 years later the homeless.
Left in 2016. I complained about all the homeless camps off I-225 and I couldn't tell you how many people irl on here (back as The Donald) "I don't see camps!" LOOK AROUND, PAY ATTENTION! Checking nextdoor, homeless situation 6 years later- they inhabit suburban streets...
Wait. Someone gave homeless people several thousand dollars and sent them to LA? That's almost funny.
How are there still so many people in California when they are spreading in numbers sufficient to corrupt multiple states?
Illegals from South and Central America
Citizens are leaving... Imports/Illegals are taking their place.
There won’t be anywhere to run soon.
Cuckorado
Pierre Delecto? I thought I told you to get out of here!
Lmao
A just verdict would be for Colorado to lose a seat in Congress, a seat in the Senate and two electoral votes for the same amount of time that Jack Philips was bullied by the state of Colorado.
If CO complains that it is unconstitutional - explain that so was their treatment of Jack, and they didn't mind that at all.
Colorado would argue that for the seat lost to be Boebert...
That lipsy faggot from CO has no business being in his position.
Woke 'Struggle Sessions' by the 'Red Guard', alphabet mafia.
Interesting to hear that question from the justice who wrote the decision that made trannies a protected class.
Big Mike probably threatened them.
“Speak softly and carry a big stick”
-Big Mike
Disabled people should be a protected class.
So should retards, then politicians couldn't prey on them.
They prey on each other?
That means all democrats are protected
Based, but people here don't get it.
I knew someone would
Never ever ever going to give up fighting lgbtqbbq++pedofiles
Unless God or nature changes, I'll never accept these perversions.
If they would just stop fucking kids, they would die out in a generation.
They don't "fuck" kids.... they RAPE children. #WordsMatter
Re-education camps were a key part of the Constitution I believe and very consistent with freedoms and fundamental rights...
That sounds like a great leap.
clearly you haven't been to a training yet
Californians ruin all the good states
The Californians that you speak of that are now ruining CO and ID and Austin are not native Californians. They are like a horde of locusts that have invaded from New England and the East coast. They have no ties here, no history here.
Call them what they are, cosmopolitan migrants that move from city to city leaving ruin in their wake.
First they destroyed the rust belt in the 70s and 80s, then they came out here to do their thing and now that mission has been accomplished they have moved on to Boise, Denver, Boulder and Austin to start anew.
Again, study after study is showing that Californians moving to ID, WY, and MT are more right wing than the average in that state and make the state vote more Republican.
Native Montana Republicans: "Perhaps drag shows for kids aren't bad..."
Transplant Montana Republicans from California: "DRIVE OUT THE DEGENERATES! DEUS VULT!"
“Hurr don’t California my Texas”
If only native born Texans had voted, Beto O’Rourke would have beaten Ted Cruz in 2018
What exactly could they have done to stop it? Honest question
There hasn't been a legitimate election in CA since Ah-nold was installed.
No true Scotts!
But yeah, they hit CA and bounced back.
Yeah keep blaming "DAH CALIFORNIUNS" for your own state's piss poor political participation amongst conservatives. Y'all so busy being "left alone" that you're forgetting to go out and protect your freedoms.
I guarantee you... if I move from CA, I am NOT voting blue wherever I'm moving... BUT I AM VOTING!
Right from the SCOTUS. I'll add to this: every "diversity and inclusion" role in corporate America is discriminatory by default and a political officer working for the Democrats - no exception, every one of them. This is beyond fucking illegal and they pushed this on us all. The "reeducation" goes right along with these roles.
Gorsuch ain't havin' it.
If you want a gay cake from my bakery it’ll be 5 million dollars and I will do the worst job imaginable. If you don’t pay for services I will sue you
Unfortunately, that will get you sued. Better off telling the Butt Pirates to get the fuck out of your store.
At this point its just obvious Marxist are shopping to violate Religious Rights
Theriouthly? That thoundth thuper! Letth thart the proceth!
nonono that's not what it was. It was propaganda about an unconstitutional law denying him his RIGHT to refuse to do business with any customer for any reason. It's not "discrimination".
"re-education" is now "training"?
something, something... 1984
Unconstitutional Colorado Law.
Sure, that means very little, but a SCOTUS judge should at least point that out.
You don't need classes to tell someone about one specific law.
And what law? Because going out of your way to target someone because of their religious beliefs falls under discrimination.
They could have gone to a different bakery, they picked him because he is Christian. Then acted as if he was the only bakery in the entire state.
CO lawyer sounds like he salivates soy.
The gay cake/wedding issue is quite simple. Exploit the faggots. Charge them 10x the normal rate.
Capitalism.
That won't work. Charging a "protected" group more is also a violation of those "civil rights" laws. The entire law needs to be invalidated.
It is for specialty cakes. Different options and styles priced.
Exactly. They're trying to go off menu. I'll have to quote you that once I know the full scope of your desired order.
Charging them more for the same thing, yes. Charging anyone the same ridiculous amount for the same gay cake would have to fly
Compulsory training is forced brainwashing.
So yes, reeducation.
ERIC OLSON EATS FAT DICK
Olson sounds like he’s a faggot.
nice1
eric olson looks like and sounds like a sniveling little faggot- fitting for the case he's arguing.
"That's not poop, it's just a bi-product of eating healthy meals."
The CO Groomer General was doing something called 'sugar coating' when he denied the person was re-educated.
Nothing says liberal free society like involuntary servitude and reeducation classes.
Behavioral (homosexuality) genetics is a weak science and not predictive. The best way to study genetics is with identical twins who share the exact DNA. There are twins where one is homo and the other hetero. This means there is something outside of biology causing this behavior.
/golfclap
THAT IS FUCKED UP!
A re-education program? Where are we, China?
Ahh, the marxists and their reeducation camps. Good times.
Go into the city and demand that every liberal bake shop make you a Trump cake or a "Straight Pride" cake. Guarantee you will be kicked out of the store, beaten by Antifa and then arrested by faggot LE.
Eric Olson rat-faced raspy-voiced beta cuck
"You're allowed to have your own opinions in the United States so long as you attend the indoctrination programs to have the right opinions."
What the shitting fuck happened to this country?
Another way of saying training to educate a person on the law, is called re-education. The law does not say whether or not a person has to accept same sex marriage, nor does it say that people who don't agree with same sex marriage have to be forced into servitude for that which they disagree with.