On certain issues, surprisingly yes. They annexed parts of Ukraine specifically to give them the legal right to send conscripts there to fight, because they didn't have the legal ability to send them outside the national borders. Also, they had no legal ability to declare war on Ukrainr (nor would they want to because of all that would entail), so they just called it a "special military operation", which is legally a meaningless term. However, it allows them to move the military into action somehow. Ukraine too hasn't declared war for much the same reasons.
Yep. Lavrov talked about the Russian Constitution, in response to naming it a "special military intervention". You know, whether Putin informed him about the operation, and all he said or could say, everything was in the Russian Constitution.
It's all awfully silly the way they've gone about this shit. But I guess there must be some factor which ties their hands more than we can see as outside observers. At any rate, the fallout (both literal and figurative) from using nukes I am sure is not something Russia wants to deal with, despite what some of their more retarded propagandists on TV say. If the let that genie out of the bottle it will not end well for them in many different ways.
that is the excuse they will use. the truth is russia is weak and would be destroyed quickly if it made such a mistake. they know it. only people who are completely ignorant of military operations believe otherwise.
I mean, it's not really an excuse. It actually does go against their laws to launch a first strike. They would indeed get fucked up if they did, of course. But they won't. There would be no reason to nuke Ukraine as that will still not make them surrender. It'll only make more countries, including Ukraine, want to acquire nukes.
Not gonna happen. Russia cannot launch a nuclear first strike by their own laws.
wait... so Russia is a country that will follow its own laws?
On certain issues, surprisingly yes. They annexed parts of Ukraine specifically to give them the legal right to send conscripts there to fight, because they didn't have the legal ability to send them outside the national borders. Also, they had no legal ability to declare war on Ukrainr (nor would they want to because of all that would entail), so they just called it a "special military operation", which is legally a meaningless term. However, it allows them to move the military into action somehow. Ukraine too hasn't declared war for much the same reasons.
Yep. Lavrov talked about the Russian Constitution, in response to naming it a "special military intervention". You know, whether Putin informed him about the operation, and all he said or could say, everything was in the Russian Constitution.
It's all awfully silly the way they've gone about this shit. But I guess there must be some factor which ties their hands more than we can see as outside observers. At any rate, the fallout (both literal and figurative) from using nukes I am sure is not something Russia wants to deal with, despite what some of their more retarded propagandists on TV say. If the let that genie out of the bottle it will not end well for them in many different ways.
"Ooops."
that is the excuse they will use. the truth is russia is weak and would be destroyed quickly if it made such a mistake. they know it. only people who are completely ignorant of military operations believe otherwise.
Truth and justice are on Russia's side.
Russians will fight to the last drop of blood.
The GloboHomo commies will cut and run like in Vietnam.
once russia has no blood left to bleed the world will be a better place.
Only for communists like you.
I mean, it's not really an excuse. It actually does go against their laws to launch a first strike. They would indeed get fucked up if they did, of course. But they won't. There would be no reason to nuke Ukraine as that will still not make them surrender. It'll only make more countries, including Ukraine, want to acquire nukes.
I agree