You just described how communism comes to power every time. Only I'd say that D. Is: The illusion of helping less fortunate people with the ulterior motive of taking power.
I'm glad that people are starting to get that the average liberal is not the "peace and love" hippies of the 1960s..
but a violent and fascist and evil person. they aren't confused little sheep they are the wolves trying to do the leading. they are wolves pretending to be sheep in order to try to manipulate you. they are not being lied to they are the ones doing the lyin
Ephesians 6:12 (NKJV) For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual [hosts] of wickedness in the heavenly [places.]
Liberalism has the "perception" of being pro-freedom, of being pro-"little guy", anti-establishment, etc.
In reality, liberalism is just something the left has coopted and is actually nothing more than just giant children throwing tantrums that they weren't the ones in power.
The reason being, the perception of "liberalism" started in the late 60s, when the vietnam war was raging, and that was when the hippies, the anti-war songs, john Lennon's commie utopia "Imagine" song was coined, etc. You'll notice, that starting from Nixon in the late 60s, all the way to the early 90s with Bush Sr., it was almost entirely republican presidents (with Carter being the only Democrat president in that time period, who also coincidentally presided over a terrible recession, but that's another story).
Thus, for the time period where hippies raged and "liberalism" was trendy, the establishment was basically Republicans.
So, the left, who are just democrats that are interested in nothing but power, appeared to be anti-establishment when they waged war against nixon, Reagan, etc., when in reality they only hated Nixon and Reagan and friends because they were republican. Proof? Look at the same hippies and "anti-establishment" of the 70s and 80s and what they're doing today. They're ALL pro-establishment now. Because THEIR guys are in power. Except when Trump was president, who is not part of the establishment (he is a multi billionaire, but he isn't part of The Cathedral), then they were suddenly anti establishment again. Then Biden got in power and now they're pro-establishment.
And the reason why the left has coopted the term "liberalism" is because, again, the perception of "liberalism" is "oh, those 70s hippies who were anti war and anti establishment", so the left hides behind "liberalism" as a shield, kind of like a Motte & Bailey tactic. It's basically the same thing how the left coopted the term "rape", where, for the normies, it brings up images of a man holding a knife to a woman's throat and fucking her raw and dry while she's screaming in pain. In reality the term "rape" has been raped so badly that dumb shit like "regret rape" and "he called me a cunt and that's rape" are somehow things in clown world.
All this is explained per the Political Trichotomy, which is basically taking the Political Compass, but realizing that the left libertarian (LL) quadrant basically doesn't exist. TFM has some videos about the trichotomy, and one proof he gives is that some poll tracked voters in the 2016 election and plotted them on the political compass. The trump voters on the right were basically split 50-50 for right libertarian and authoritarian (RL and RA). The left however was like 95% authoritarian, thus proving the Trichotomy.
For more examples, george Carlin (who is the face of the liberal hippies of the 70s) is genuinely LL, and if you look at all of his political routines where he isn't explicitly shitting on the right and the republicans, his routines sound like he's making fun of the left today (Fear of Germs, Soft Language/Political Correctness, The importance of Questioning everything, etc.). A modern day example of LL is Jimmy Dore, who is slandered and attacked by the LA quadrant (aka the real core of the left). This is because there are obviously differences between the LL and the LA, jsut like there are differences between the RL and the RA.
And it makes intuitive sense that LL can't exist, because it's a contradiction. LL basically means that you think the government will give out free money to everyone, but also simultaneously will not impose any rules or restrictions on people. This is fucking stupid because no one, person or company or entity or government, will ever just give out free money without having strings attached to it. LLs are basically just burnt out hippies who haven't REALLY finished their thought processes to their logical conclusions, which is why they're such a tiny faction that they basically don't exist.
they dont even want to help the less fortunate, they just want to punish the rich even if it means punishing the less fortunate. They are moral busybodies with no principles except to themselves and use the shield of "i just want to help the poor/minorities/etc" as a benevolent sounding means to get what they want.
I saw last night that the new fad is "shoulder width reduction surgery." Troons will now be able to have a doctor saw their collarbones apart and re-attach them to give the illusion of not having manly shoulders. This will result in painful spinal alignment issues and other bad side-effects, but now that the "lunatics are running the asylum" the whole concept of "first, do no harm" is out the window.
Now imagine if Michael Jackson were alive today, "behaving" in the same manner. MSM would be celebrating his plastic surgeries, defending him from accusations of child-grooming, speculating over when he would finally "come out" as a drag-queen, if he had not already. As the "progressive?" momentum of the Leftist Agenda continues to dominate MSM, we may even see them white-wash/rehabilitate his reputation from "plastic-surgery obsessed child-molesting nutcase" flip-flopping to "beloved eccentric philanthropist."
The Tolerant Left's narratives are built of a foundation of hypocrisy. They preach "fat acceptance" and order normal people to "accept them as they are" when they can't even accept themselves as they are: they hate themselves so much they feel the need to create a new fictional identity for themselves. (They also demand unquestioned tolerance for deviant sexual activity and public nudity, while also demanding "their right" to censor anything related to normalcy or American Tradition that offends their microaggressions.)
So the people who screech "I ORDER YOU TO ACCEPT ME AS I AM" (while inappropriately dressed in a prostitute costume and clown makeup) and proclaim "I WAS BORN THIS WAY, APPLAUD YOU BIGOT" are lining up to have experimental body-modification/genital-mutilation "surgeries." It's not just zipper-tits and "man-ginas," some of them want to do facial surgery to chase their unattainable fantasies of "passing as female."
The "shoulder reduction surgery" sounds like one of the worst ideas I've heard yet, as far as the side-effects and long-term outcome. An ethical spinal specialist or chiropractor would likely be aghast at what this "procedure" would do to a patient, it would be almost certain to cause terrible permanent back pain. There's also the issue of the severed/shortened/re-attached collarbones, which would be similar to (or worse than) the long-term effects from breaking both collarbones.
Like if I am born with an ugly mole that hurts when I walk why the fuck can't I cut it off?
It's kinda weird if you feel like that about awesome functional parts like your dick or balls, hard to relate, but yeah in principle I don't oppose body mod, I just happen to only want to cut off useless parts of myself not useful ones.
I don’t have a problem with having a mole that’s bothering you removed. I’ve done that. It’s quite a jump to go from that to believing you were born in entirely the wrong body and that if you just cut off your genitals you won’t want to kill yourself anymore.
You ever see that news article about the woke faggot hipster who sued a stock image site because he saw a picture of a woke faggot hipster and thought it was him but it turned out to be another random faggot? That's basically where we are today.
They claim religious people are engaged in mass psychosis, even though the Abrahamic faiths have been around for over 7000 years and have ebbed and flowed throughout all civilizations, which would check off all marks needed to dismiss it being a mass psychosis event.
Meanwhile with the rise of social media there has been a 200% increase in gays and trans in just 10 years.
I’m always suspicious of “nonconformists” who all look the same.
I’m always suspicious of “tolerant” people who never shut up about how much they hate anyone who doesn’t completely agree with them.
I’m always suspicious of “critical thinkers” who cover their ears and do the “na-na-na-na-na I can’t hear you” bullshit when they encounter evidence that contradicts their belief.
This is a pet peeve of mine. The people who consider themselves "creative" are literally the least creative people among us. They obediently follow the herd anywhere it goes. They dutifully hop on board every "current thing" that comes up. They're by far the most easily manipulated in our society.
In the traditional sense, Americans have lost their creativity. When we still had remnants of freedom, we actually did have creative people in film, TV, music, writing, painting, science etc. We were the world leaders in each of those categories and BY FAR. Those people built up a reputation for American creativity that went around the world. Now these idiots flock to those areas because they want to APPEAR creative, which is the last thing an actual creative person would do. Ironically, these pathetic purple haired idiots are the LAST group of people our ancestors would want living off their reputation.
And it's obvious in the shit they produce. Modern movies are all remakes, sequels and copycats. Music is so simplistic and fake, it's unlistenable. TV is just cameras following idiots around.
But if we want genuine creativity to return, FREEDOM is the only answer. There's a reason the USSR wasn't pumping out world revolutionary art during the same era we were. Tyranny crushes creativity. Leftists seem to think their moronic utopian fantasy will lead to a bunch of people being paid to produce art, but it actually leads to miserable, soul crushing totalitarianism.
I don't clearly see the connection between the headline "Your creativity is a uniform now" and the meme (which frankly stands up fine on its own). Could someone please explain it like I'm vaccinated? Thanks.
biggest point to be made about all of this. The more flamboyant and stereotypical someone is, the less self acceptance they really have. Like if someone is smart, they don't go around bragging about whatever degree they have, they're just smart and act like it.
This. The Tolerant Left/LGBTQRSWTFLOL HIV +/- order us to "accept them as they are" when they flounce about in opposite-sex apparel with abnormal hair-colors and faces full of tattoos & piercings. They can't accept themselves as they are, and feel the need to turn themselves into an eyesore of a bizarre art project.
It would be more honest to demand we "accept them for what they have become" or "accept the new identity they have chosen for themselves." The fact that they have to demand this, and become butthurt at being "misgendered" should be a wake-up call that they are not "behaving" in a normal manner and are being completely unreasonable in ordering normal people to ignore reality.
> If someone insists on wearing womens' dresses while having a beard and shaved head to "celebrate their gendyr fluidity," they should not be surprised if normal people don't know if they should refer to them as "he/her/they/xhey/heher" or some "pronoun" they have invented. This new "normalization of the unthinkable" narrative is ridiculous: it is not logical to expect normal people to keep up with whatever esoteric kink 3% of the populace has recently "discovered" and embraced.
The one positive aspect: the Tolerant Left has become so entitled they no longer feel the need to follow the rules of polite society. They can smugly pontificate about how "tolerant" they are, but there will always be the "New Normal" of screeching in outrage at any "micro-aggression" to remind normal people that these easily-offended emotionally-incontinent weirdos should be avoided, and not allowed to be in charge of anything.
its come down to good vs evil. "always was - astronaut gun meme"
The hierarchy of the left.
D. Help less fortunate people.
C. Save the planet even if it means the less fortunate die.
B. Destroy the wealth of anyone richer even if it means destroying the planet.
A. Kill everyone who disagrees because they are slowing down step D.
You just described how communism comes to power every time. Only I'd say that D. Is: The illusion of helping less fortunate people with the ulterior motive of taking power.
I'm glad that people are starting to get that the average liberal is not the "peace and love" hippies of the 1960s..
but a violent and fascist and evil person. they aren't confused little sheep they are the wolves trying to do the leading. they are wolves pretending to be sheep in order to try to manipulate you. they are not being lied to they are the ones doing the lyin
Liberalism has the "perception" of being pro-freedom, of being pro-"little guy", anti-establishment, etc.
In reality, liberalism is just something the left has coopted and is actually nothing more than just giant children throwing tantrums that they weren't the ones in power.
The reason being, the perception of "liberalism" started in the late 60s, when the vietnam war was raging, and that was when the hippies, the anti-war songs, john Lennon's commie utopia "Imagine" song was coined, etc. You'll notice, that starting from Nixon in the late 60s, all the way to the early 90s with Bush Sr., it was almost entirely republican presidents (with Carter being the only Democrat president in that time period, who also coincidentally presided over a terrible recession, but that's another story).
Thus, for the time period where hippies raged and "liberalism" was trendy, the establishment was basically Republicans. So, the left, who are just democrats that are interested in nothing but power, appeared to be anti-establishment when they waged war against nixon, Reagan, etc., when in reality they only hated Nixon and Reagan and friends because they were republican. Proof? Look at the same hippies and "anti-establishment" of the 70s and 80s and what they're doing today. They're ALL pro-establishment now. Because THEIR guys are in power. Except when Trump was president, who is not part of the establishment (he is a multi billionaire, but he isn't part of The Cathedral), then they were suddenly anti establishment again. Then Biden got in power and now they're pro-establishment.
And the reason why the left has coopted the term "liberalism" is because, again, the perception of "liberalism" is "oh, those 70s hippies who were anti war and anti establishment", so the left hides behind "liberalism" as a shield, kind of like a Motte & Bailey tactic. It's basically the same thing how the left coopted the term "rape", where, for the normies, it brings up images of a man holding a knife to a woman's throat and fucking her raw and dry while she's screaming in pain. In reality the term "rape" has been raped so badly that dumb shit like "regret rape" and "he called me a cunt and that's rape" are somehow things in clown world.
All this is explained per the Political Trichotomy, which is basically taking the Political Compass, but realizing that the left libertarian (LL) quadrant basically doesn't exist. TFM has some videos about the trichotomy, and one proof he gives is that some poll tracked voters in the 2016 election and plotted them on the political compass. The trump voters on the right were basically split 50-50 for right libertarian and authoritarian (RL and RA). The left however was like 95% authoritarian, thus proving the Trichotomy.
For more examples, george Carlin (who is the face of the liberal hippies of the 70s) is genuinely LL, and if you look at all of his political routines where he isn't explicitly shitting on the right and the republicans, his routines sound like he's making fun of the left today (Fear of Germs, Soft Language/Political Correctness, The importance of Questioning everything, etc.). A modern day example of LL is Jimmy Dore, who is slandered and attacked by the LA quadrant (aka the real core of the left). This is because there are obviously differences between the LL and the LA, jsut like there are differences between the RL and the RA.
And it makes intuitive sense that LL can't exist, because it's a contradiction. LL basically means that you think the government will give out free money to everyone, but also simultaneously will not impose any rules or restrictions on people. This is fucking stupid because no one, person or company or entity or government, will ever just give out free money without having strings attached to it. LLs are basically just burnt out hippies who haven't REALLY finished their thought processes to their logical conclusions, which is why they're such a tiny faction that they basically don't exist.
Very interesting!
they dont even want to help the less fortunate, they just want to punish the rich even if it means punishing the less fortunate. They are moral busybodies with no principles except to themselves and use the shield of "i just want to help the poor/minorities/etc" as a benevolent sounding means to get what they want.
That's what it says. ;)
and the wicked as God said repeatedly must be destroyed.
They get one chance of repentance and recompense for their errors. But if they dont change there and then, they must be killed.
How many times are we going to let them change?
They expect you to respect their true self when they couldn't even accept their true self. All the gender affirming mutilations doesnt change reality.
Exactly. You wouldn’t need surgery if you accepted your real self.
I saw last night that the new fad is "shoulder width reduction surgery." Troons will now be able to have a doctor saw their collarbones apart and re-attach them to give the illusion of not having manly shoulders. This will result in painful spinal alignment issues and other bad side-effects, but now that the "lunatics are running the asylum" the whole concept of "first, do no harm" is out the window.
I don't know how people on one hand can understand that plastic surgery addiction is a thing, and support "transitioning".
It's the same fucking rabbit hole. You keep trying to fix what the last change fucked up till you look like a monster
"Normalizing" the abnormal, demanding "tolerance" for the unthinkable. Clown World is no joke.
Remember just a few years ago, MSM created massive hoopla over Michael Jackson's plastic surgery addiction. They portrayed him as a crackpot obsessed with looking like Diana Ross, and speculated endlessly about his deteriorating nose. They also portrayed him as a habitual child-molester including child actors he befriended, which may/may not be true depending on who you ask. (Link to playlist for RazorFist's in-depth "Michael Jackson Rebuttal" video series, Very NSFW language/subject matter, Red Pills galore)
Now imagine if Michael Jackson were alive today, "behaving" in the same manner. MSM would be celebrating his plastic surgeries, defending him from accusations of child-grooming, speculating over when he would finally "come out" as a drag-queen, if he had not already. As the "progressive?" momentum of the Leftist Agenda continues to dominate MSM, we may even see them white-wash/rehabilitate his reputation from "plastic-surgery obsessed child-molesting nutcase" flip-flopping to "beloved eccentric philanthropist."
The Tolerant Left's narratives are built of a foundation of hypocrisy. They preach "fat acceptance" and order normal people to "accept them as they are" when they can't even accept themselves as they are: they hate themselves so much they feel the need to create a new fictional identity for themselves. (They also demand unquestioned tolerance for deviant sexual activity and public nudity, while also demanding "their right" to censor anything related to normalcy or American Tradition that offends their microaggressions.)
So the people who screech "I ORDER YOU TO ACCEPT ME AS I AM" (while inappropriately dressed in a prostitute costume and clown makeup) and proclaim "I WAS BORN THIS WAY, APPLAUD YOU BIGOT" are lining up to have experimental body-modification/genital-mutilation "surgeries." It's not just zipper-tits and "man-ginas," some of them want to do facial surgery to chase their unattainable fantasies of "passing as female."
The "shoulder reduction surgery" sounds like one of the worst ideas I've heard yet, as far as the side-effects and long-term outcome. An ethical spinal specialist or chiropractor would likely be aghast at what this "procedure" would do to a patient, it would be almost certain to cause terrible permanent back pain. There's also the issue of the severed/shortened/re-attached collarbones, which would be similar to (or worse than) the long-term effects from breaking both collarbones.
Why should I want to accept my real self though?
Like if I am born with an ugly mole that hurts when I walk why the fuck can't I cut it off?
It's kinda weird if you feel like that about awesome functional parts like your dick or balls, hard to relate, but yeah in principle I don't oppose body mod, I just happen to only want to cut off useless parts of myself not useful ones.
I don’t have a problem with having a mole that’s bothering you removed. I’ve done that. It’s quite a jump to go from that to believing you were born in entirely the wrong body and that if you just cut off your genitals you won’t want to kill yourself anymore.
I know but I have to quip about the semantics
It's more about submitting to blatant delusion and forcing you to stay quiet about it than anything else. Right out of the Weimar playbook.
I mean, nobody dyes their hair purple and gains three hundred pounds because they love their body
Speaking of Reddit, how many feds work there?
place became run by tranny moderators and they banned everybody who wasn't a far left communist
Elon should buy them
You ever see that news article about the woke faggot hipster who sued a stock image site because he saw a picture of a woke faggot hipster and thought it was him but it turned out to be another random faggot? That's basically where we are today.
"Accept us for who we are!".
"OK. You do it first"
I said that to a tranny to accept how God made him and it went mental. Well- mentaler.
You may have even pushed it to join that 42%; great job. Keep up the good work
Most of them are emulating other mentally ill people.
Yup. Another facet of their projection.
They claim religious people are engaged in mass psychosis, even though the Abrahamic faiths have been around for over 7000 years and have ebbed and flowed throughout all civilizations, which would check off all marks needed to dismiss it being a mass psychosis event.
Meanwhile with the rise of social media there has been a 200% increase in gays and trans in just 10 years.
I’m always suspicious of “nonconformists” who all look the same.
I’m always suspicious of “tolerant” people who never shut up about how much they hate anyone who doesn’t completely agree with them.
I’m always suspicious of “critical thinkers” who cover their ears and do the “na-na-na-na-na I can’t hear you” bullshit when they encounter evidence that contradicts their belief.
Basically, I’m always suspicious of leftists.
This is a pet peeve of mine. The people who consider themselves "creative" are literally the least creative people among us. They obediently follow the herd anywhere it goes. They dutifully hop on board every "current thing" that comes up. They're by far the most easily manipulated in our society.
In the traditional sense, Americans have lost their creativity. When we still had remnants of freedom, we actually did have creative people in film, TV, music, writing, painting, science etc. We were the world leaders in each of those categories and BY FAR. Those people built up a reputation for American creativity that went around the world. Now these idiots flock to those areas because they want to APPEAR creative, which is the last thing an actual creative person would do. Ironically, these pathetic purple haired idiots are the LAST group of people our ancestors would want living off their reputation.
And it's obvious in the shit they produce. Modern movies are all remakes, sequels and copycats. Music is so simplistic and fake, it's unlistenable. TV is just cameras following idiots around.
But if we want genuine creativity to return, FREEDOM is the only answer. There's a reason the USSR wasn't pumping out world revolutionary art during the same era we were. Tyranny crushes creativity. Leftists seem to think their moronic utopian fantasy will lead to a bunch of people being paid to produce art, but it actually leads to miserable, soul crushing totalitarianism.
Mental illness brought on by mass indoctrination.
I don't clearly see the connection between the headline "Your creativity is a uniform now" and the meme (which frankly stands up fine on its own). Could someone please explain it like I'm vaccinated? Thanks.
Unironically. Diversity Equity and Inclusion or DIE.
Tattoos are a permanent uniform of brainless conformity.
It’s funny how they all look the same
biggest point to be made about all of this. The more flamboyant and stereotypical someone is, the less self acceptance they really have. Like if someone is smart, they don't go around bragging about whatever degree they have, they're just smart and act like it.
This. The Tolerant Left/LGBTQRSWTFLOL HIV +/- order us to "accept them as they are" when they flounce about in opposite-sex apparel with abnormal hair-colors and faces full of tattoos & piercings. They can't accept themselves as they are, and feel the need to turn themselves into an eyesore of a bizarre art project.
It would be more honest to demand we "accept them for what they have become" or "accept the new identity they have chosen for themselves." The fact that they have to demand this, and become butthurt at being "misgendered" should be a wake-up call that they are not "behaving" in a normal manner and are being completely unreasonable in ordering normal people to ignore reality.
> If someone insists on wearing womens' dresses while having a beard and shaved head to "celebrate their gendyr fluidity," they should not be surprised if normal people don't know if they should refer to them as "he/her/they/xhey/heher" or some "pronoun" they have invented. This new "normalization of the unthinkable" narrative is ridiculous: it is not logical to expect normal people to keep up with whatever esoteric kink 3% of the populace has recently "discovered" and embraced.
The one positive aspect: the Tolerant Left has become so entitled they no longer feel the need to follow the rules of polite society. They can smugly pontificate about how "tolerant" they are, but there will always be the "New Normal" of screeching in outrage at any "micro-aggression" to remind normal people that these easily-offended emotionally-incontinent weirdos should be avoided, and not allowed to be in charge of anything.
Just because no one understands you doesn’t make you an artist
a lot of the times it just means youre retarded
Always been this way with these people.
Not unlike the conformity is it? Hmmm.
Lol
kek
more insightful than i had come to expect from this place, no offense everyone
And yet, somehow WE are never allowed to be comfortable being OURselves.
They like to say that 41% of Trannys kill themselves because society is mean to them. That's the reason, they say.
I'm sure that weighs into it, but it's hard to figure out how much is due to that vs inherent instability. How would we discern?