See how they keep fixating on the idea that the kid was killed for "tampering with cars",,, and how they keep saying lives are "worth more than property", but the article states a few paragraphs down that the homeowner and this kid got into a confrontation. If that confrontation was physical or involved the brandishing of weapons, then the shooting wasn't over the cars, but over fear of bodily harm, which is justified. I get so sick of all these MSM rags giving full platforms to all the BLM-type "Black people are always innocent victims of racism" propaganda about every incident before real facts are even disclosed.
I'd say shooting someone for fucking with your car is justified, that's your means of survival and if it's damaged or stolen that puts your life in danger, on top of that the one being shot is a net negative to society. If I was on the jury I wouldn't convict if the kid was shot five times in the back.
Imagine how many pictures of this kid holding a gun and throwing up gang signs that the daily mail had to scroll through on his social media before they found the one of him at a birthday party with balloons.
When I carried a gun for a living one of my biggest fears was armed children. They don’t understand the significance of taking a life. I wasn’t worried about them shooting me, either. I was worried I would have to kill a child.
Probably not in Oklahoma but idk anymore. You would have a hard time dealing with it personally though. I almost took a grown man’s life and it really bothered me.
DC Safety Squad Nee Nee Taylor told the Washington Post: 'We cannot normalize people feeling that bringing a gun to a car break-in or a carjack, or anything involved in property, is a solution to decrease crime.'
I disagree, this kid will not re-offend, thus lowering crime, even just a little.
13yo criminal out at 4am stealing cars? I bet that kid never met his father. Betcha mom hasn't worked a day in 13 years. And STILL didn't have time to be good parent.
I hope the shooter remembers "Oh yeah, the kid said he was going to put a cap in my ass and he reached into his coat. I feared for my life and defended myself." Pass it on.
And the fucking "pro crime DC safety clowns" say "don't bring a gun". I guess that only applies if you are a law abiding citizen. Honk Honk.
Homeowner can't be White. If he was, his face and address would already be posted all over mainstream media so Antifa/BLM could show up and kill him or burn his house down. Same reason the taqueria shooter is so far having his identity protected. He's Latino, so the media isn't sure which minority's side to take. If he was White, again, his face and home would be everywhere for all to see and he would be branded a racist White Male who "murdered an unarmed Black male and should face years in jail"
Despite the tragedy, the boy's school is remembering him as a smart and inquisitive young student who was oftentimes found with a book tucked under his arm
He's at school. Of course he'd have a book every so often. Damn, the media sucks.
If the kid was just messing with the car, petty theif he didn't deserve to be shot. Just scare him off.
But it seems like when the home owner confronted the kid, the kid didn't leave and chose to stay. (And probably attacked the home owner). In that case, what was the home owner supposed to do?
If the kid was just messing with the car, petty theif he didn't deserve to be shot. Just scare him off.
One less thief is always a benefit. he would have ended up causing thousands of dollars worth of damage if he was left for too long. trying to scare him off opens yourself up to risk, attacking before you're noticed is the safest option.
if you start letting thieves survive then honest men will turn to theft as it's safer, easier and more profitable than working an honest job.
See how they keep fixating on the idea that the kid was killed for "tampering with cars",,, and how they keep saying lives are "worth more than property", but the article states a few paragraphs down that the homeowner and this kid got into a confrontation. If that confrontation was physical or involved the brandishing of weapons, then the shooting wasn't over the cars, but over fear of bodily harm, which is justified. I get so sick of all these MSM rags giving full platforms to all the BLM-type "Black people are always innocent victims of racism" propaganda about every incident before real facts are even disclosed.
I'd say shooting someone for fucking with your car is justified, that's your means of survival and if it's damaged or stolen that puts your life in danger, on top of that the one being shot is a net negative to society. If I was on the jury I wouldn't convict if the kid was shot five times in the back.
Imagine how many pictures of this kid holding a gun and throwing up gang signs that the daily mail had to scroll through on his social media before they found the one of him at a birthday party with balloons.
Nah, they just want to dox him and take away his livelihood, keep him from banking services, and harass him when he tries to go to a restaurant.
He was just jogging.
No property is worth a life, even if the "kids" we're going to very possibly murder the shooter before he capped one.
Get ready for more peaceful burning and looting.
When I carried a gun for a living one of my biggest fears was armed children. They don’t understand the significance of taking a life. I wasn’t worried about them shooting me, either. I was worried I would have to kill a child.
Blame the parents.
Your life is over if you have to go to court for it.
Probably not in Oklahoma but idk anymore. You would have a hard time dealing with it personally though. I almost took a grown man’s life and it really bothered me.
DC Safety Squad Nee Nee Taylor told the Washington Post: 'We cannot normalize people feeling that bringing a gun to a car break-in or a carjack, or anything involved in property, is a solution to decrease crime.' I disagree, this kid will not re-offend, thus lowering crime, even just a little.
Bu-but.. he was often seen carrying a book under his arm!
The royal We again.
They think they are in charge of how people think, and lose credibility by the day.
You gotta get 'em before they reproduce.
13yo criminal out at 4am stealing cars? I bet that kid never met his father. Betcha mom hasn't worked a day in 13 years. And STILL didn't have time to be good parent.
I hope the shooter remembers "Oh yeah, the kid said he was going to put a cap in my ass and he reached into his coat. I feared for my life and defended myself." Pass it on.
And the fucking "pro crime DC safety clowns" say "don't bring a gun". I guess that only applies if you are a law abiding citizen. Honk Honk.
so, I assume the kid was black then?
How dare you? How absolutely dare you be 100% correct?
These joggers have to learn somehow...
They couldn’t even find a picture of him where he wasn’t throwing a gang sign?
Homeowner can't be White. If he was, his face and address would already be posted all over mainstream media so Antifa/BLM could show up and kill him or burn his house down. Same reason the taqueria shooter is so far having his identity protected. He's Latino, so the media isn't sure which minority's side to take. If he was White, again, his face and home would be everywhere for all to see and he would be branded a racist White Male who "murdered an unarmed Black male and should face years in jail"
After reviewing his tweets and pigmentation, the US Atty will decide whether to charge the homeowner.
After reviewing his voting record ...
Fuck that kid and his family. Should have raised him better.
They will be allowed to burn down DC while J6ers are in solitary for taking selfies inside the capitol and the rare broken window.
He was probably just going to the store to get some Skittles!
He's at school. Of course he'd have a book every so often. Damn, the media sucks.
this might be the next one
If the kid was just messing with the car, petty theif he didn't deserve to be shot. Just scare him off.
But it seems like when the home owner confronted the kid, the kid didn't leave and chose to stay. (And probably attacked the home owner). In that case, what was the home owner supposed to do?
One less thief is always a benefit. he would have ended up causing thousands of dollars worth of damage if he was left for too long. trying to scare him off opens yourself up to risk, attacking before you're noticed is the safest option.
if you start letting thieves survive then honest men will turn to theft as it's safer, easier and more profitable than working an honest job.
Nope. Mess with my property get dead no warnings. Thieves offer no value to society.