I won't be surprised when the deep state removes the current useful idiot because they no longer need him. How will they do it? Will it be like Kennedy, Nixon, or Trump?
Nixon was set up for doing nothing wrong by the fake News Washington Post and the political hack Bob Woodward (who wrote two anti-trump books)
he was one of the greatest presidents he handled far in affairs perfectly and he was going against the deep State and that's why they had to get rid of him. and so they made up some phony scandal blaming him and claiming he did something wrong for doing whatever other president did (remember that Obama spied on his political opponents and they didn't give a shit)
and they forced nicks into resign based on that phony bullshit. and you saw the same thing with Donald trump. the fake News Washington Post political hacks all of these people conspiring against him.. the people that worked for him his own attorney general conspiring against him. same with nixon..
and once he was gone they got a deep state agent to be the president and institute all of these things that later harmed you
Don’t forget they asked Nixon to “take responsibility” even if he never gave the order.. same thing they asked of Trump after January 6 (Lindsey Graham asked Trump to take responsibility but he refused because he did nothing wrong). It’s conservatives weakness to take responsibility for people working under you doing illegal things without your approval.
Trump is playing all these idiots into all the tarps they set for themselves.
Like the pied Piper, or a fiddler at a hootenanny.
Fake news = Primacy in learning... Trump knows how to control them with theor own reactions.. No one is going to believe him, that doesn't already.. so...
Ask Hunter Biden about the Parmesan Cheese escapade, and why he went to all that effort over not much?
What Musk is doing with Twitter, Trump is making them do to Twitter, Just to try to get ahead of Trump.
Musk gave Azov Battallion free communications, just to give the impression that the DOD/ pentagon was not in command of the entire Ukraine theatre.. the entire time anyway... who is the DOD's biggest contractor?
sure, but soemone needs to do it in a legal capacity to break the ice.
Without Trump, you'd be in a bloody civil war already.
you all forget that...
He put the hope back in the jar. He transcended office without setiing a foot out of line. ni oder to make them destroy themselves by layung traps for him, thinking he would too break the law in order to manipulate them into jail..
That's not how you actually do it, legally.
You and everyne else,just got used to Presidents being in charge of everything ( the aren't) and having the final say (they don')..
he showed you that, you stil arent listening, nor giving much appreciation for your freedom..
were you made to take the Jab? or did they have to unlawfully coerce you exposing theor hand as the government were unable to be so heavy handed?
Maybe just a little appreciation, may help you a little.
I have dragged my name across the coals, on both sides of the aisle, not just defending his actions, but working hard to put criminals in jail..
You jus watch me.
Thus s how I roll, I'm an looker and writer, and sayer and letter sender...
collect evidence.. al of the gaslighting is to present the impression that such is not worth it..
But who else will have the evidence then?
I have lived 1000 lives and have kids, so... this is the hil.
These CIA hoaxes are getting more and more stupid by the day, and the latest against Trump (nuclear codes in mar a lago’s safe or in Melania’s wardrobe) is an eye opener. If you didn’t get Russiagate or the “Trump knew there were bounties on American troops’ heads but preferred to keep his relationship with Putin” hoax, or the recent “Trump is a fraudster for legally avoiding taxes so he cannot talk about election fraud” hoax… now you got solid evidence that it’s always CIA people from the inside doing illegal things and blaming you for something that you never requested (like entering the Capitol to frame you as an insurrectionist or bringing top secret documents to set you up).
Long story short he was so far ahead in polls he had nothing to worry about then a couple rogue staffers decided to break into his political opponents office without his knowledge causing him to have to resign. Literal deep state fuckery happened to him.
Robert Maxwell did not trust his daughter, when he was found dead, his will only allowed her $80,000 a year to live on. He must have suspected something.
I don't just believe Tucker here or anything. I'm not that gullible. It is food for thought. As for the rest of the curriculum I received in school I've gone far beyond it. Including basic philosophy stuff. Questions like, "what is truly knowable?" or "what is truth?".
Simple truths are self-evident. The historical record could be a complete lie and this does not change.
Stone did a fantastic piece on Ukraine and what has transpired prior to this current shit show "war". I think it's called "Nation On Fire" or something like that. Check it out. It's well done and explains a lot.
It is an interesting take on the historical record according to the state. I had always assumed Nixon confessed. That I'll revisit and I'll spend more time listening to his tapes. I always enjoy those.
For me, whether this is true or not, the course does not change. Nothing the state could tell me would impact what I believe or what I believe must be done. Accepting my fallibility is a big part of this already. And while that fallibility may be true, the truth is still easy to see.
Smog was so bad in LA, every breath felt like a knife stab. In OH a river caught fire dozens of times, with 5-story flames at times. Great Lakes became sewage and waste pits. Toxic waste sites all over country were leaching into ground water, automobile tail pipes spewed megatons of lead into the atmosphere.
EPA eventually grew to have overreach and politicization, but undoubtedly something had to be done in the 60's.
Yep even Trump was right about this one, clean air and clean water, that's the EPA's role. Sadly the EPA lost site of this simple mission a long time ago.
Government is not reason, it is not eloquence - it is force! Like fire it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action. - George Washington
So basically that was just me agreeing with you. :)
Most people are keyboard warriors who like to start fights and be assholes to people they don't know. As Mike Tyson said, most of y'all are way too comfortable saying shit that would get you laid out in the real world.
Most/a lot of people are faggots who can't take a punch anymore. Snowflakes. It's really sad. People need to toughen up, and learn to roll with the punches. Otherwise I foresee a life of anger and frustration for them. Happy Warriors and Self-Amused Trolls are what we need. Long Live KEKistan.
I think the biggest problem, across all these agencies whether EPA, FBI, SEC, whatever, is that our craven Representatives in Congress grant them the authority to write rules which are them implemented as if they had the force of law.
Little wrong with an EPA that implements specific, law-encoded environmental policy. They shouldn't have been given the authority to declare human exhalation a fucking pollutant.
We always devolve into this conversation of "what parts of the government must go" when the problem is always the people running it.
Nope. The problem is who **will be running it. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. There is nothing so permanent as a temporary government program. These programs always balloon. I've yet to see a single government agency not fall to mission creep. Even if you equip safeguards in the EPA, they'll vote them off. Even if you lock it's power it through different branches of government, when one overzealous party or an emergency takes over it will be back here.
There's nothing wrong with the concept of the EPA (if it's properly limited).
Thats how it always works. It's always innocuous on it's face.
The founders knew we needed a government, so they created a government based solely around limiting itself.
But we didn't need a bunch of 3-letter federal agencies. The founders envisioned a voluntary union of states. In fact that precedent of the national nanny-state can be blamed on Lincoln. If you really want this to be fixed, defer to your local state government
I don't want to breath lead in the air because they're putting it in gas.
Nobody does, but the free market would have corrected itself regardless.
Problem is anything can be weaponized. Just like a gun it can be used for good or bad.
The real problem is there are about 500 people making all the decisions for 375 million people. Representative government has always been a farce but it's even more so now when we have the technology available for everyone to represent their wishes directly.
The whole "vote for this person and they will do what you want" is bullshit because the only people elected officials look out for are themselves.
Those things for sure needed addressed, a government agency is never the way to go about it. If we wanted those things to be illegal, or controlled, we already have a mechanism to do so and one that is answerable to the people. Bureaucracies just aren't a good thing.
Maybe, maybe not. Politicians can be voted out, I can't think of a time a bureaucrat has been voted out. It's not a perfect remedy, but it's a good bit better than the current recourse available, which is none.
Nixon Devalued the dollar precipitously when he took America off the gold standard and sped up the decline of this country.
Reagan destroyed the Evil Empire of the USSR.
Remember the 1972 billboards advertising Ford Pintos for $1900
and VW Carman Gias for $1800?
Not 3 years later those cars were $3000.
50% price increase.
Nixon caused that.
I know, because I bought a new car in 1975 for $2700.
Nixon also forced open the trade door with China that most likely occurred at the behest of corporations in the United States that were then being held hostage by leacherous trade unions that were bankrupting those corporations.
I think opening relations with China is one of those things that was a good idea but in retrospect totally fucked us. The cold war with Russia was real and the last thing that the US wanted was a China/Russian communist alliance. The theory at the time was that free markets will ultimately lead to the end of communism. Instead China managed to morph into some wierd market-based communist society and prove every model wrong. But it's easy to see at the time the appeal of using economic growth to turn China into a US ally against Russia rather than going the miltiary route we did in Korean and Vietnam.
Isn't that the same thing we did with Germany and Japan post WW2? That time it lead to a long lasting peace and lack of military conflict. I can't blame them for thinking that investing in China's economy and helping them build at the expense of our own was preferable to WW3.
I don't think the Marshall Plan was at the expense of our own though. Our manufacturing continued to increase and thrive through the late sixties. Very little of it ever went to Europe, although we did build them up (Japan as well) to be consumers of our goods
During the OPEC oil embargo, inflation-adjusted oil prices went up from $27.17 per barrel (bbl) in October 1973 to $60.81 per barrel (bbl) in March 1974. The oil embargo gave OPEC new power to achieve its goal of managing the world's oil supply and keeping prices stable.
No one's economy can withstand a huge jolt like that without large repercussions.
Small fuel efficient cars were flying off the lots at that time.
The Arabs are NOT our friends.
Reagan was a gungrabber who first introduced gun restrictions in california with the mulford act. He said, and i quote: "there is absolutely no reason why, out on the street, today, civilians should be carrying a loaded weapon".
Reagan also bombed Libya for no reason other than to please his jewish friends in israel.
Reagan was your average hollywood democrat turned republican. Arnold without the accent.
Nixon fought against Democrat corruption and he was hounded for it by the fake News Washington Post and fake news reporter Bob Woodward
his foreign affairs was top-notch
Reagan did not do any of those things. Reagan did not destroy the USSR Reagan was just president when it fell. because communism ALWAYS falls eventually
remember Reagan signed an amnesty bill for the Democrats allowing all the illegal immigrants that later had daca kids and he got nothing in return. Reagan pushed America far more libertarian when we should have been at war with the Liberals instead of a peacetime with them
Reagan deregulated the media and got rid of the fairness doctrine which opened the doorway for all the fake news that you saw later on.. the dude won 49 of 50 states and thanks to his bullshit legalizing of fake news and allowing unlimited immigration that shit never happened again
Nixon was a far greater threat to the establishment. Reagan WAS the establishment
fucking actor paid by The Establishment to run for them and implement all the globalist policies they'd always wanted
globalism got its Kickstart under reagan. that was the beginning of the offshore and of all the US jobs and the dismantling of American prosperity
he just hit it well under a stupid ass boomer-centric platform. the dumb fuck boomers that ruined politics for 40 years fell for it hook line and sinker
"Reagan did not do any of those things. Reagan did not destroy the USSR Reagan was just president when it fell. because communism ALWAYS falls eventually"
Says the guy who was born yesterday. I personally watched Reagan's rise from his "A Time for Choosing" spech at the 1964 Goldwater convention to the day he left office in1989.
Reagan defeated the USSR by bankrupting as he demanded hard currency for purchases as opposed to extending never-ending credit to them even as Trump would have done the Chinese in a 2nd term - but had that opportunity stolen from him and from us.
I lived both Nixon and Reagan. Reagan was by far the superior statesman and strategist of the two. Truman, and Nixon along with GHWB and Clinton are the reason we have the CCP we have to deal with today.
Soviet Communism fell because the leadership got desperate from stagnation, and allowed some democratic reforms.
For the first time Russians had a voice, and they threw communists the fuck out.
It wasn't Reagan. It wasn't NATO, who only gave Soviet hardliners the excuse to go full North Korea. It wasn't the other Eastern European countries that rebelled against Communism - they could have been easily crushed. It wasn't the Pope. It was the Russian people.
Yeltsin and his supporters don't get even 1% of the historical credit that they deserve.
You are an ill-informed Russio-phile (and I say this as one who is of 1/2 Russian stock myself ).
You have conveniently forgotten the huge Reagan Admin military build up, and how the US funded the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan, which bogged down and bled the USSR teasury in the equivalent of what was their own "Vietnam."
Even today the entirety of Russia's economy is the equivalent to only that of the US state of New York. It was far less than that back then. The USSR could not afford to lead and support the Warsaw Pact, and Eastern European populace was restive, inspired among other things by Reagan's Tear Down this Wall speech in Berlin, Reagan's stare down of Gorbachev at Reykyavik in 1987, and JPII's religious leadership as a Polish Pope who stared down USSR's puppett Jaruzelski 1981-1983, and motivated the likes of Lech Walessa's Solidarity" movement, Czech republic's Vaclav Havel, et. al.
The USSR ran out of money becuse Reagan cut off the cheap access to Western sourced credits, international; bank loans, and money. When a regime runs out of money the stagnation you refer to is the result.
USSR ran out of hard currency to compete with us in emerging "Star Wars" technologies. The Russian people took heart as they saw Eastern European Soviet satellites asserting their freedom, and they chose to summon the courage to boot "Gorby."
I've spent most of my life hating Russia for not moving away from Communism as quickly as say Estonia. But it had been slowly heading in the right direction.
I consistently support regional SELF-DETERMINATION, no matter if it's the Falklands, Taiwan, Tibet, Kashmir, Catalonia, California, Kosovo, Ossetia, Crimea, Donbas, etc, etc, etc...
You have conveniently forgotten the huge Reagan Admin military build up, and how the US funded the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan, which bogged down and bled the USSR teasury in the equivalent of what was their own "Vietnam."
It had the completely opposite effect. It handed the hardliners a blank check. All hardships could be justified as being caused by Western aggression. And the hardships of the early 1980s were nothing compared to 1917-53.
Soviets won in Afghanistan, but chose to leave due to policy change in Moscow. The puppet government they left behind lasted years, not hours like with US.
Even today the entirety of Russia's economy is the equivalent to only that of the US state of New York.
You are economically illiterate.
The real (PPP) GDP of Russia is about 4.65 Trillion, close to surpassing Germany.
New York State is 2 Trillion. But that's because it contains the accumulated momentum of centuries of corporate leadership, the WHQ of many great global corporations, with tons of intellectual property, trademarks, patents, etc.
The upcoming Eurasian Union is over 5.1 Trillion, but that's just with small countries surrounding Russia. Other BRICS members, especially India, are likely to join in the future.
Compared to say Calvin Coolidge, Nixon was a socialist.
Nixon grew the Welfare State, inflated the dollar, added price controls, bowed to """affirmative action""", wasted trillions on "war on drugs" expansion, EPA, OSHA, CPSC, supported Israel and Pakistan war crimes, etc, etc, etc.
You may need to do some more research. Nixon while not a sinister spy, was no conservative hero. He was quite (what we would call today) progressive with his policies.
fuck the gold standard I don't need gold to be wealthy
Amazing... Not only say something this phenomenally retarded more than once, but you're getting upvotes for saying it.
The gold standard is what we back our currency with. Do you know what it's based on because we don't have a gold standard? DEBT. You need to now accumulate massess of debt in order to get anything, and the money can just be infinitely printed until a global crisis occurs.
"Fuck the gold standard" May as well say "Fuck the bridge me and my car are currently on, it should fall 1000 feet to the bottom of a gully with me in it"
I think deepstate gov really started in earnest after WWII. Basically, there was unprecedented government and bureaucracy and the US was at the top of the world in terms of power and wealth. The massive secretive bodies that emerged from the war didn't just go away, instead they entrenched themselves in the West and worked to build their influence in all other corners of the world.
OSS became the CIA......A great film that illustrates it is "The Good Sheppard" with Matt Damon...Ironically it was directed by DiNiro but he didn't absorb any of it. Its where I got my username.
Same with the X-Files. One would think the actors, writers and creators of the show would know better and see the signs of what they talked about on the show when it happened to Trump as president. Unfortunately their liberalism is so strong that they failed to connect the dots.
Check out Blacklisted By History by M Stanton Evans. McCarthy was right, Soviet agents from the OSS were the origin of what is now called the deep state.
Yup, it's all smoke and mirrors, one lie after the next with these commies. And libtards worship government thinking they are working for their best interests.
I love how the Boomer fagots think that everybody that's actually speaking out for you is part of the cia. but of course all of the people telling you to sit back and do nothing like Sean hannity Fox and Friends Ted Cruz etc all all ur buddies right?
lmao
they've literally got you worshiping the people that want you dead and hating the people that actually care about you
If Tuck is CIA, they could have him take this take as controlled opposition. Baked Alaska was the one who called out Ray Epps for being a fed even though he is a fed himself. Something similar would be going on here. They have Tuck going after the CIA so that way he seems more credible later on when they need him to take a stance to suit their needs. Not saying I necessarily believe that, I really don't know what to believe, but that would be logic if that were the case.
Also, more important than individual ideologies is division. It's fine to have some people believe or know the truth as long as you have other segments that will watch msdnc and believe the opposite, and another segment that doesn't know or care because their too caught up in sex, drugs, or some other entertainment. The division is the holy grail.
I mean, they already did that during the 2020 election . People forget how Tucker was basically became persona non grata here, after the election, because he basically betrayed all of MAGA
Yup. I was a real big fan but I’ll never trust him again. He is more aggressive about more real, under reported topics than the rest of legacy media though
Someone else on this site recommended it and it filled in a lot of details about who he was and why he had to die. My opinion about this notorious blue blood poon hound changed significantly. In spite of his flaws, he seemed to have the country's best interests at heart, which of course made him a deep state target.
I saw that. The segments scope was very narrow. After dropping that nuke Thursday and scheduling you the following day it was odd. I assume that was Fox's decision?
The French - and in particular, de Gaulle - were right to be suspicious. Turns out we got caught in the scam and so we just said "ah, fuckit, we don't need to peg the dollar to anything, then"
Yeah people forget shit like this. That was probably one of the reasons for the collapse of Soviet communism,
It was the Bushes who sold this country out to China.
China was on its way to overthrowing communism and becoming a free society, until Tiannamen. At that point we should have cut contact with them, but Poppy Bush went in the complete opposite direction. W just doubled down.
He was, by all accounts (and by those of us conservatives who lived through his presidency), an extremely wise and consummate politician. Even after his "disgrace" other beltway pols would visit him on the down-low in order to get political advice from him. The cowardly faggots couldn't be seen publicly with him, of course, but his opinions as an elder statesman were invaluable. Washington fucksticks.
CIA FBI, etc etc, ALL NEED TO BE DISBANDED, HEAVILY INVESTIGATED, and all guilty of treason, and/or other crimes, don't care how petty, all agents involved need to be publicly executed!!!
Imagine thinking today's average politician is capable of doing what that would take.
I didn't get in here for that. I want one of Nancy's refrigerators and an early retirement on K Street. Go train your laser sights on someone else. I'm just here to keep the gravy train moving.
Good point. I guess "what were they planning to impeach Richard Nixon for" would be more accurate. Most people think he was impeached, though, which is related.
I agree. Trump handled that shit like a boss and never apologized for anything. Republicans being pussies always infuriated me, and seeing President Trump do the exact opposite was so refreshing.
Cucker Tarlson has been on fire lately. I think he's given them his own ultimatum. He produces his own shows, the ONLY one at Faux News to do so. He also brings his own advertisers, such as My Pillow, which famously cancelled ad buys for the rest of Fox.
I was born in the mid 70's. My whole life I heard about Watergate, Nixon's scandals, conspiracy theories...etc. I found out when I was about 30 years old (I never had a history class in school, only social studies, which weirdly always focused on primitive undeveloped people in either Paupau New Guinea, Native Hawaii or Africa) that Nixon wasn't the president that got us into Vietnam. He was the president that got us out of Vietnam.
Also, the reason why you never hear about the origins of Affirmative Action is because the Federal Policies regarding Affirmative Action were made and implemented by the Nixon administration. It's true JFK talked about affirmative action but he never implemented any policies, regulations or programs. Neither did LBJ. Nixon did.
I also heard various rumors about who "deep throat" was.....never in all those rumors did anyone even suspect it was a former deputy director of the FBI, Mark Felt. He was the Original Andrew McCabe.
Yes, Nixon got us out of Vietnam. Came to a great surprise to me too, and I did not learn that until I was about 30. Was watching an interview with Bill Stein who defended him.
Same thing happened to me. His anti-Trump lies that I was certain were lies made me start having doubts about the credibility of the infamous Mr. Woodward.
If he was telling fiction about Trump, was it possible there was more to the Watergate scandal?
Richard Nixon was the next to last president to have come from modest beginnings. Every president thereafter, other than Ronald Reagan (the last), came from upper middle class ("well to do") and rich households.
And yet these same three letter agencies still exist today. It just shows they are above the law and anyone who doesn’t do their bidding is ousted. Only another revolution will work to remove their power.
Check out Red Pilled America’s series on this. Nixon was a great man.
Agree, that was a great deep dive into the deep state on how the FBI and CIA set Nixon up. Woke Army was another real eyeopener.
I have never really looked deep into Watergate. I'm shocked how bad this really is.
I wish I could say it is unbelievable, but we all know it is totally believable.
I won't be surprised when the deep state removes the current useful idiot because they no longer need him. How will they do it? Will it be like Kennedy, Nixon, or Trump?
I'd be ok watching him spray a pink mist all over his wife live on TV.
That's not his wife it's his sister !
Nixon was set up for doing nothing wrong by the fake News Washington Post and the political hack Bob Woodward (who wrote two anti-trump books)
he was one of the greatest presidents he handled far in affairs perfectly and he was going against the deep State and that's why they had to get rid of him. and so they made up some phony scandal blaming him and claiming he did something wrong for doing whatever other president did (remember that Obama spied on his political opponents and they didn't give a shit)
and they forced nicks into resign based on that phony bullshit. and you saw the same thing with Donald trump. the fake News Washington Post political hacks all of these people conspiring against him.. the people that worked for him his own attorney general conspiring against him. same with nixon..
and once he was gone they got a deep state agent to be the president and institute all of these things that later harmed you
Only yesterday did I learn Woodward was Naval Intelligence and worked in the White House before going to the Post
Don’t forget they asked Nixon to “take responsibility” even if he never gave the order.. same thing they asked of Trump after January 6 (Lindsey Graham asked Trump to take responsibility but he refused because he did nothing wrong). It’s conservatives weakness to take responsibility for people working under you doing illegal things without your approval.
30 years ago, a friend of mine’s mom essentially said the same thing and, until your post, I didn’t see it.
I’m glad I was wrong.
Far in affairs?
Don't forget the extrajudicial killings via drone.
Remember what Ike said about the defense industrial complex
Trump is playing all these idiots into all the tarps they set for themselves.
Like the pied Piper, or a fiddler at a hootenanny.
Fake news = Primacy in learning... Trump knows how to control them with theor own reactions.. No one is going to believe him, that doesn't already.. so...
Ask Hunter Biden about the Parmesan Cheese escapade, and why he went to all that effort over not much?
What Musk is doing with Twitter, Trump is making them do to Twitter, Just to try to get ahead of Trump.
Musk gave Azov Battallion free communications, just to give the impression that the DOD/ pentagon was not in command of the entire Ukraine theatre.. the entire time anyway... who is the DOD's biggest contractor?
Trump must tread lightly. He needs the patriots who see thru the bullshit to act. The swamp cannot be removed thru executive order or voting.
This is accurate
sure, but soemone needs to do it in a legal capacity to break the ice.
Without Trump, you'd be in a bloody civil war already.
you all forget that...
He put the hope back in the jar. He transcended office without setiing a foot out of line. ni oder to make them destroy themselves by layung traps for him, thinking he would too break the law in order to manipulate them into jail..
That's not how you actually do it, legally.
You and everyne else,just got used to Presidents being in charge of everything ( the aren't) and having the final say (they don')..
he showed you that, you stil arent listening, nor giving much appreciation for your freedom..
were you made to take the Jab? or did they have to unlawfully coerce you exposing theor hand as the government were unable to be so heavy handed?
Maybe just a little appreciation, may help you a little.
I have dragged my name across the coals, on both sides of the aisle, not just defending his actions, but working hard to put criminals in jail..
You jus watch me.
Thus s how I roll, I'm an looker and writer, and sayer and letter sender...
collect evidence.. al of the gaslighting is to present the impression that such is not worth it..
But who else will have the evidence then?
I have lived 1000 lives and have kids, so... this is the hil.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/wxWjVOk6ZNIU/
25th amendment. "Joe Bidan" is senile.
More redpill videos and info here:
https://patriots.win/p/15HIhWzTCT/
The Corvette is a convertible.
These CIA hoaxes are getting more and more stupid by the day, and the latest against Trump (nuclear codes in mar a lago’s safe or in Melania’s wardrobe) is an eye opener. If you didn’t get Russiagate or the “Trump knew there were bounties on American troops’ heads but preferred to keep his relationship with Putin” hoax, or the recent “Trump is a fraudster for legally avoiding taxes so he cannot talk about election fraud” hoax… now you got solid evidence that it’s always CIA people from the inside doing illegal things and blaming you for something that you never requested (like entering the Capitol to frame you as an insurrectionist or bringing top secret documents to set you up).
defund the CIA. FBI......ATF..... Build our walls, enlarge the national guard.
As soon as you realize how close Hillary was to Watergate it all starts to make sense nowadays lol
Long story short he was so far ahead in polls he had nothing to worry about then a couple rogue staffers decided to break into his political opponents office without his knowledge causing him to have to resign. Literal deep state fuckery happened to him.
I never looked into it but just knew it was bullshit by the amount of hype it got from shitlibs growing up
See also: McCarthyism
They taught us Watergate was proven fact in our curriculums. If Tucker is correct then this is how far they went.
Robert Maxwell did not trust his daughter, when he was found dead, his will only allowed her $80,000 a year to live on. He must have suspected something.
All of it that benefits them they have twisted and redacted in their favour.
I don't just believe Tucker here or anything. I'm not that gullible. It is food for thought. As for the rest of the curriculum I received in school I've gone far beyond it. Including basic philosophy stuff. Questions like, "what is truly knowable?" or "what is truth?".
Simple truths are self-evident. The historical record could be a complete lie and this does not change.
I think it was the late Norm Macdonald that said "well thank God the people that wrote the history books were the good guys, every time."
Stone did a fantastic piece on Ukraine and what has transpired prior to this current shit show "war". I think it's called "Nation On Fire" or something like that. Check it out. It's well done and explains a lot.
It is an interesting take on the historical record according to the state. I had always assumed Nixon confessed. That I'll revisit and I'll spend more time listening to his tapes. I always enjoy those.
For me, whether this is true or not, the course does not change. Nothing the state could tell me would impact what I believe or what I believe must be done. Accepting my fallibility is a big part of this already. And while that fallibility may be true, the truth is still easy to see.
Tucker is correct. Nothing he said is wrong. Check out red pilled America on the fighter.
Great. I'll look into it.
imagine how far they go to discredit those they don’t like… swamp is huge
Love their show. I emailed such, they replied back. Very cool. Didn’t think I would hear anything.
Nixon gave us the EPA.
Smog was so bad in LA, every breath felt like a knife stab. In OH a river caught fire dozens of times, with 5-story flames at times. Great Lakes became sewage and waste pits. Toxic waste sites all over country were leaching into ground water, automobile tail pipes spewed megatons of lead into the atmosphere.
EPA eventually grew to have overreach and politicization, but undoubtedly something had to be done in the 60's.
Yep even Trump was right about this one, clean air and clean water, that's the EPA's role. Sadly the EPA lost site of this simple mission a long time ago.
Government is not reason, it is not eloquence - it is force! Like fire it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action. - George Washington
So basically that was just me agreeing with you. :)
And George too.
It's the one-two punch:
Give people power over other people and they will wield it like a club. Remember Stanford?
Milgram Experiments. Yes.
Also check out the "Rat Utopia". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_sink
I think the biggest problem, across all these agencies whether EPA, FBI, SEC, whatever, is that our craven Representatives in Congress grant them the authority to write rules which are them implemented as if they had the force of law.
Little wrong with an EPA that implements specific, law-encoded environmental policy. They shouldn't have been given the authority to declare human exhalation a fucking pollutant.
Concur
Nope. The problem is who **will be running it. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. There is nothing so permanent as a temporary government program. These programs always balloon. I've yet to see a single government agency not fall to mission creep. Even if you equip safeguards in the EPA, they'll vote them off. Even if you lock it's power it through different branches of government, when one overzealous party or an emergency takes over it will be back here.
Thats how it always works. It's always innocuous on it's face.
But we didn't need a bunch of 3-letter federal agencies. The founders envisioned a voluntary union of states. In fact that precedent of the national nanny-state can be blamed on Lincoln. If you really want this to be fixed, defer to your local state government
Nobody does, but the free market would have corrected itself regardless.
Problem is anything can be weaponized. Just like a gun it can be used for good or bad.
The real problem is there are about 500 people making all the decisions for 375 million people. Representative government has always been a farce but it's even more so now when we have the technology available for everyone to represent their wishes directly.
The whole "vote for this person and they will do what you want" is bullshit because the only people elected officials look out for are themselves.
agree, but we've lost the "middle" righteous plot, because too many Americans are no longer righteous, I believe.
I think this was the genus of GEOTUS's ' for every new regulation repeal two.'
Corporations are naturally driven to maximize profits.
Bureaucracies are naturally driven to maximize budget.
Those things for sure needed addressed, a government agency is never the way to go about it. If we wanted those things to be illegal, or controlled, we already have a mechanism to do so and one that is answerable to the people. Bureaucracies just aren't a good thing.
So you pass a law, no new agency; then the police state just makes its own anti-pollution bureaucracy division. Same or worse result.
Maybe, maybe not. Politicians can be voted out, I can't think of a time a bureaucrat has been voted out. It's not a perfect remedy, but it's a good bit better than the current recourse available, which is none.
The EPA was not a bad idea.
But it got way, way, way too big and is now controlled by partisan politicians who want to destroy this whole country.
Right, which is why it's bad.
Also gave us title 9
He also ended the last remaining bits of the gold standard.
Was he reamed? Yes
Were the actors who reamed him doing it for the wrong reasons? Yes
Was he a good president? No.
And inflation
I like Nixon far more than Reagan
Really?
Nixon Devalued the dollar precipitously when he took America off the gold standard and sped up the decline of this country. Reagan destroyed the Evil Empire of the USSR. Remember the 1972 billboards advertising Ford Pintos for $1900 and VW Carman Gias for $1800?
Not 3 years later those cars were $3000. 50% price increase. Nixon caused that. I know, because I bought a new car in 1975 for $2700.
Nixon was not our friend
Nixon also forced open the trade door with China that most likely occurred at the behest of corporations in the United States that were then being held hostage by leacherous trade unions that were bankrupting those corporations.
I think opening relations with China is one of those things that was a good idea but in retrospect totally fucked us. The cold war with Russia was real and the last thing that the US wanted was a China/Russian communist alliance. The theory at the time was that free markets will ultimately lead to the end of communism. Instead China managed to morph into some wierd market-based communist society and prove every model wrong. But it's easy to see at the time the appeal of using economic growth to turn China into a US ally against Russia rather than going the miltiary route we did in Korean and Vietnam.
Some people don't want to hear it, but you are right. Only in hindsight do we know what China morphed into.
Tons of unions and Trump himself said moving factories to China would gut the Midwest and middleclass.
Hindsight had nothing to do with it.
Relations were a good thing; building their economy while destroying our our manufacturing infrastructure was craven
Isn't that the same thing we did with Germany and Japan post WW2? That time it lead to a long lasting peace and lack of military conflict. I can't blame them for thinking that investing in China's economy and helping them build at the expense of our own was preferable to WW3.
I don't think the Marshall Plan was at the expense of our own though. Our manufacturing continued to increase and thrive through the late sixties. Very little of it ever went to Europe, although we did build them up (Japan as well) to be consumers of our goods
Ass Kissinger.
There was an oil embargo in 1973.
No one's economy can withstand a huge jolt like that without large repercussions.
Small fuel efficient cars were flying off the lots at that time.
The Arabs are NOT our friends.
Never will be
Reagan was a gungrabber who first introduced gun restrictions in california with the mulford act. He said, and i quote: "there is absolutely no reason why, out on the street, today, civilians should be carrying a loaded weapon".
Reagan also bombed Libya for no reason other than to please his jewish friends in israel.
Reagan was your average hollywood democrat turned republican. Arnold without the accent.
fuck the gold standard
Nixon fought against Democrat corruption and he was hounded for it by the fake News Washington Post and fake news reporter Bob Woodward
his foreign affairs was top-notch
Reagan did not do any of those things. Reagan did not destroy the USSR Reagan was just president when it fell. because communism ALWAYS falls eventually
remember Reagan signed an amnesty bill for the Democrats allowing all the illegal immigrants that later had daca kids and he got nothing in return. Reagan pushed America far more libertarian when we should have been at war with the Liberals instead of a peacetime with them
Reagan deregulated the media and got rid of the fairness doctrine which opened the doorway for all the fake news that you saw later on.. the dude won 49 of 50 states and thanks to his bullshit legalizing of fake news and allowing unlimited immigration that shit never happened again
Nixon was a far greater threat to the establishment. Reagan WAS the establishment
fucking actor paid by The Establishment to run for them and implement all the globalist policies they'd always wanted
globalism got its Kickstart under reagan. that was the beginning of the offshore and of all the US jobs and the dismantling of American prosperity
he just hit it well under a stupid ass boomer-centric platform. the dumb fuck boomers that ruined politics for 40 years fell for it hook line and sinker
Don't forget divorce. Sure, it was before he was president, but as Gov, he signed the first no-fault divorce law.
And the retarded "11th commandment" that useless fags still try to wield as a shield from the new right trying to fix the shit they broke.
Invaded Grenada, funded the future terrorists "paramilitary" in Afghanistan and cartels in Central America. Iran-Contra.
Reagan might as well be on the flag of GOPe.
he was the first official GOPe
he ushered in their reign of a thousand years of darkness
"Reagan did not do any of those things. Reagan did not destroy the USSR Reagan was just president when it fell. because communism ALWAYS falls eventually"
Says the guy who was born yesterday. I personally watched Reagan's rise from his "A Time for Choosing" spech at the 1964 Goldwater convention to the day he left office in1989.
Reagan defeated the USSR by bankrupting as he demanded hard currency for purchases as opposed to extending never-ending credit to them even as Trump would have done the Chinese in a 2nd term - but had that opportunity stolen from him and from us.
I lived both Nixon and Reagan. Reagan was by far the superior statesman and strategist of the two. Truman, and Nixon along with GHWB and Clinton are the reason we have the CCP we have to deal with today.
Soviet Communism fell because the leadership got desperate from stagnation, and allowed some democratic reforms.
For the first time Russians had a voice, and they threw communists the fuck out.
It wasn't Reagan. It wasn't NATO, who only gave Soviet hardliners the excuse to go full North Korea. It wasn't the other Eastern European countries that rebelled against Communism - they could have been easily crushed. It wasn't the Pope. It was the Russian people.
Yeltsin and his supporters don't get even 1% of the historical credit that they deserve.
You are an ill-informed Russio-phile (and I say this as one who is of 1/2 Russian stock myself ).
You have conveniently forgotten the huge Reagan Admin military build up, and how the US funded the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan, which bogged down and bled the USSR teasury in the equivalent of what was their own "Vietnam."
Even today the entirety of Russia's economy is the equivalent to only that of the US state of New York. It was far less than that back then. The USSR could not afford to lead and support the Warsaw Pact, and Eastern European populace was restive, inspired among other things by Reagan's Tear Down this Wall speech in Berlin, Reagan's stare down of Gorbachev at Reykyavik in 1987, and JPII's religious leadership as a Polish Pope who stared down USSR's puppett Jaruzelski 1981-1983, and motivated the likes of Lech Walessa's Solidarity" movement, Czech republic's Vaclav Havel, et. al.
The USSR ran out of money becuse Reagan cut off the cheap access to Western sourced credits, international; bank loans, and money. When a regime runs out of money the stagnation you refer to is the result.
USSR ran out of hard currency to compete with us in emerging "Star Wars" technologies. The Russian people took heart as they saw Eastern European Soviet satellites asserting their freedom, and they chose to summon the courage to boot "Gorby."
I am a Russia scholar, not a Russophile.
I've spent most of my life hating Russia for not moving away from Communism as quickly as say Estonia. But it had been slowly heading in the right direction.
I consistently support regional SELF-DETERMINATION, no matter if it's the Falklands, Taiwan, Tibet, Kashmir, Catalonia, California, Kosovo, Ossetia, Crimea, Donbas, etc, etc, etc...
It had the completely opposite effect. It handed the hardliners a blank check. All hardships could be justified as being caused by Western aggression. And the hardships of the early 1980s were nothing compared to 1917-53.
Soviets won in Afghanistan, but chose to leave due to policy change in Moscow. The puppet government they left behind lasted years, not hours like with US.
You are economically illiterate.
The real (PPP) GDP of Russia is about 4.65 Trillion, close to surpassing Germany.
New York State is 2 Trillion. But that's because it contains the accumulated momentum of centuries of corporate leadership, the WHQ of many great global corporations, with tons of intellectual property, trademarks, patents, etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_GDP
Moscow metro area alone is over a Trillion (PPP), and it was a total commie basketcase without a single business just 40 years ago.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_by_GDP
The upcoming Eurasian Union is over 5.1 Trillion, but that's just with small countries surrounding Russia. Other BRICS members, especially India, are likely to join in the future.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurasian_Economic_Union
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRICS
Bless your heart. You might want to do a little more research on the Cold War
It always amazes me when I see someone so passionately certain about something they are so completely wrong about.
Nixon, Reagan, and Trump were all a much lesser evil compared to the Demonrats.
Can't say that about the Bushes, Cheneys, McCain, Romney, Bolton, etc.
Ron Paul was closest to a perfect Republican, but he couldn't fight his way through the gatekeepers the way Trump could...
Compared to say Calvin Coolidge, Nixon was a socialist.
Nixon grew the Welfare State, inflated the dollar, added price controls, bowed to """affirmative action""", wasted trillions on "war on drugs" expansion, EPA, OSHA, CPSC, supported Israel and Pakistan war crimes, etc, etc, etc.
Oh, and the fucking 55-MPH speed limit!
https://mises.org/library/nixonian-socialism
https://archive.ph/ZQaj8#selection-4071.0-666.1013
You may need to do some more research. Nixon while not a sinister spy, was no conservative hero. He was quite (what we would call today) progressive with his policies.
Then you must enjoy what he did to the dollar?
I REALLY "love" what Reagan did with immigration.
Now tell me how much you "love" Trump, glowfag.
Hahahahahahahahahahaha!!! XD
That's what I thought.
You're projection is showing... you might want to tuck that back in. (~_^) Hahahahahahahahaha! XD
"Never trust the. They'll stab you int he back." - Nixon
Seems he knew everything.
What about the removal from the gold standard, was that him or someone else I'm thinking of
Look up Bretton Woods.
fuck the gold standard
I don't need gold to be wealthy
these bitcoin dumbfucks think that if they can just hoard gold they'll be rich without ever needing to get a job lol
You have the economcs knowledge of a turnip.
I bought some good amount of gold back before the crisis. Stocks, dollar, coins down. Gold up.
What’s the problem?
Do you want the dollar devalued? That is, in the long run, not pretty smart…
Amazing... Not only say something this phenomenally retarded more than once, but you're getting upvotes for saying it.
The gold standard is what we back our currency with. Do you know what it's based on because we don't have a gold standard? DEBT. You need to now accumulate massess of debt in order to get anything, and the money can just be infinitely printed until a global crisis occurs.
"Fuck the gold standard" May as well say "Fuck the bridge me and my car are currently on, it should fall 1000 feet to the bottom of a gully with me in it"
We did, you mean.
😯...the things you learn on PDW
SPEZ: last Twitter comment, who was the first person Ford called when Nixon resigned and eventually became VP. 👉 Nelson Rockefeller
I am seriously grateful for DJT and this place.
FBI is full of fags too.
At this point I think it's the entire DOJ.
Good Lord! More elites being douchebags for ages it seems.
I think deepstate gov really started in earnest after WWII. Basically, there was unprecedented government and bureaucracy and the US was at the top of the world in terms of power and wealth. The massive secretive bodies that emerged from the war didn't just go away, instead they entrenched themselves in the West and worked to build their influence in all other corners of the world.
It's what Eisenhower warned about in his departing speech.
and JFK warned about shortly before...well.
And Smedley Butler warned in a book after WW1.
BOOM HEADSHOT
☹️
Even Truman wished they'd just give reports to the POTUS and wanted their operational duties terminated.
OSS became the CIA......A great film that illustrates it is "The Good Sheppard" with Matt Damon...Ironically it was directed by DiNiro but he didn't absorb any of it. Its where I got my username.
Same with the X-Files. One would think the actors, writers and creators of the show would know better and see the signs of what they talked about on the show when it happened to Trump as president. Unfortunately their liberalism is so strong that they failed to connect the dots.
Just like gubmint employees, when the system works for you and you have a good life & money then questioning it is heresy to them.
Check out Blacklisted By History by M Stanton Evans. McCarthy was right, Soviet agents from the OSS were the origin of what is now called the deep state.
We became an Empire after WW-II
The deep state is the "power behind the throne" so to speak.
Thats when they got major official power.
Has been, is and will be wild.
Yup, it's all smoke and mirrors, one lie after the next with these commies. And libtards worship government thinking they are working for their best interests.
no the Liberals just want to be the government. it's all based on a fascist lust for power
I thought tucker worked For the CIA why is he throwing them under the bus?
Because if people think that the deep state is this powerful and all knowing and all seeing... then they won't even bother to try to fight against it.
The CIA are opportunists - not omniscient.
I love how the Boomer fagots think that everybody that's actually speaking out for you is part of the cia. but of course all of the people telling you to sit back and do nothing like Sean hannity Fox and Friends Ted Cruz etc all all ur buddies right?
lmao
they've literally got you worshiping the people that want you dead and hating the people that actually care about you
Do you think Tucker signed a contract materially different from the one Crowder was given by Daily Wire?
If Tuck is CIA, they could have him take this take as controlled opposition. Baked Alaska was the one who called out Ray Epps for being a fed even though he is a fed himself. Something similar would be going on here. They have Tuck going after the CIA so that way he seems more credible later on when they need him to take a stance to suit their needs. Not saying I necessarily believe that, I really don't know what to believe, but that would be logic if that were the case.
Controlled opposition.
These people could never have gotten this far is a company such as Fox News wasn't a part of it.
And their Redheaded Step-child Newsmax.
Watch Tucker, enjoy the content.
But always be skeptical of big media.
It's a simple as this. And the hardest pill to swallow for so many
The goal is division. Because a divided people is easier to control.
And confusion. Because confused people have a harder time choosing which side of the division they want to be on.
Also, more important than individual ideologies is division. It's fine to have some people believe or know the truth as long as you have other segments that will watch msdnc and believe the opposite, and another segment that doesn't know or care because their too caught up in sex, drugs, or some other entertainment. The division is the holy grail.
^this
I mean, they already did that during the 2020 election . People forget how Tucker was basically became persona non grata here, after the election, because he basically betrayed all of MAGA
And yet here he is at it again
Never forget pedes
Yup. I was a real big fan but I’ll never trust him again. He is more aggressive about more real, under reported topics than the rest of legacy media though
He did. He literally denied the election theft the day after the election. Maybe you don’t remember? Either way he is forever a piece of shit
My guess, they hang you up on innocuous lies to stop you from getting too close to where their actual operations are.
Hannity works for the CIA
What? This thread is about tucker. Why would you bring up hannity??
Tucker works for CIA too. They ALL do
CIA killed our president and we now all know it for sure.
And no one is talking about it or seems to care. Except at pdw
When we get the "full" 9/11 truth in some decades, almost nobody will really care.
Kkilled one and staged a coup d'état the next.
Read JFK and the Unspeakable
https://www.amazon.com/JFK-Unspeakable-Why-Died-Matters/dp/1439193886/
Someone else on this site recommended it and it filled in a lot of details about who he was and why he had to die. My opinion about this notorious blue blood poon hound changed significantly. In spite of his flaws, he seemed to have the country's best interests at heart, which of course made him a deep state target.
u/RealRogerStone
Beautiful to see!
Tucker had me on tonight.
https://patriots.win/p/16Zr0xj4jp/fashion-police-roger-stone-calls/c/
I saw that. The segments scope was very narrow. After dropping that nuke Thursday and scheduling you the following day it was odd. I assume that was Fox's decision?
I would love to read his comments.
I wrote about this recently. Was what gave Tucker the inspiration for this!
https://rogerstone.substack.com/p/nixon-threatened-to-reveal-the-cias
To follow up, this is an interview Roger did with Michael Malice recently. They talk about Nixon and the things he knew.
https://odysee.com/@MichaelMalice:6/your-welcome-with-michael-malice-242:e
Well Nixon was too soft.
He knew the 1960 election was stolen via the Chicago Daly Crime Machine and he didn't say anything "for the good of the Nation"
I mean - it did earn him a pardon...
Yeah but not from me. I still hold Nixon responsible for the China Mistake.
And he decoupled the dollar from gold.
He may have been popular, but that certainly doesn't make him right.
The French - and in particular, de Gaulle - were right to be suspicious. Turns out we got caught in the scam and so we just said "ah, fuckit, we don't need to peg the dollar to anything, then"
"Insane prosperity" for whom?
Spoiler alert: it's fake. Leveraging fake money on top of fake money doesn't make us richer. It makes us stupid and vulnerable.
Do you not understand how fiat money works - and how fractional reserve banking works?
Don't answer that - it's obvious you do not.
Nixon played China against the USSR, which at the time was a far bigger threat.
Yeah people forget shit like this. That was probably one of the reasons for the collapse of Soviet communism,
It was the Bushes who sold this country out to China.
China was on its way to overthrowing communism and becoming a free society, until Tiannamen. At that point we should have cut contact with them, but Poppy Bush went in the complete opposite direction. W just doubled down.
China was backward af and feared invasion by the USSR. They were building defenses on their border.
There were armed border skirmishes between China and USSR.
Now watch China try to grab back Pacific territories around Vladivostok when Russia is weakened.
"I still hold Nixon responsible for the China mistake"
Which mistakes do you hold yourself accountable for and what are you doing to make ammends?
Fyi, Mao and the CCP were a Globalst/CIA op. They had to get rid of Nixon or he'd have fukked with their schemes.
Who became VP after they couped Nixon and installed the first unelected President in history, Gerald Ford?
Uber Globalist, Nelson Rockefeller.
Btw As a Congressman, Gerald Ford served on the CIAs cover-up of JFKs assassination, the Warren Commission.
Tucker needs to up his security.
Operation Mockingbird never stopped.
Tucker is CIA. I don’t think he’s worried
Spoiler alert: the CIA loves it when these stories circulate because it makes them look like they are way more powerful than they actually are.
The deep state is a conspiracy theory generator. They're tickled pink when one sticks.
They're pretty fucking powerful, they have the capability to open sitting presidents cranium.
"I have, from time to time, attended the Bohemian Grove. Let me tell you. It is the most faggoty goddamned thing you could ever imagine."
-Richard Nixon
I read that in Nixon's voice
Get red pilled ! Nixon was great and then set up.
OMG this makes so much sense...and it's terrifying!
I use to believe Nixon was what they said he was, then I saw how they treated Trump...
By that logic alone I can infer that Nixon was probably a great man.
He was, by all accounts (and by those of us conservatives who lived through his presidency), an extremely wise and consummate politician. Even after his "disgrace" other beltway pols would visit him on the down-low in order to get political advice from him. The cowardly faggots couldn't be seen publicly with him, of course, but his opinions as an elder statesman were invaluable. Washington fucksticks.
CIA FBI, etc etc, ALL NEED TO BE DISBANDED, HEAVILY INVESTIGATED, and all guilty of treason, and/or other crimes, don't care how petty, all agents involved need to be publicly executed!!!
Imagine thinking today's average politician is capable of doing what that would take.
Always interesting to ask someone, "Why was Richard Nixon impeached" and hear the brainwashed reaction.
Trick question.
Good point. I guess "what were they planning to impeach Richard Nixon for" would be more accurate. Most people think he was impeached, though, which is related.
After watching Trump weather two impeachments like water off a duck's back, I have less respect for Nixon. He didn't have the fight.
I agree. Trump handled that shit like a boss and never apologized for anything. Republicans being pussies always infuriated me, and seeing President Trump do the exact opposite was so refreshing.
Watergate was jay walking compared to what these demonic fucks get away with today
exactly!!
You know those history books ...................................... yep. 🤓
,(
History is fun, no? 7+
Cucker Tarlson has been on fire lately. I think he's given them his own ultimatum. He produces his own shows, the ONLY one at Faux News to do so. He also brings his own advertisers, such as My Pillow, which famously cancelled ad buys for the rest of Fox.
I was born in the mid 70's. My whole life I heard about Watergate, Nixon's scandals, conspiracy theories...etc. I found out when I was about 30 years old (I never had a history class in school, only social studies, which weirdly always focused on primitive undeveloped people in either Paupau New Guinea, Native Hawaii or Africa) that Nixon wasn't the president that got us into Vietnam. He was the president that got us out of Vietnam.
Also, the reason why you never hear about the origins of Affirmative Action is because the Federal Policies regarding Affirmative Action were made and implemented by the Nixon administration. It's true JFK talked about affirmative action but he never implemented any policies, regulations or programs. Neither did LBJ. Nixon did.
I also heard various rumors about who "deep throat" was.....never in all those rumors did anyone even suspect it was a former deputy director of the FBI, Mark Felt. He was the Original Andrew McCabe.
Yes, Nixon got us out of Vietnam. Came to a great surprise to me too, and I did not learn that until I was about 30. Was watching an interview with Bill Stein who defended him.
The deep state wing of the military Industrial complex was NOT happy about that!
It's time to disband the CIA.
“splinter the C.I.A. in a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.”
He was going to get ousted for spying on an office....Obama literally spied on everybody including other leaders and they suck his dik
Just like Johnson was a deep state plug installed to replace Kennedy and Pence was the contingency plan for Trump.
Also read Roger Stone's book on the JFK assassination. He writes about Nixon etc.
As a shit brained retard once said "you take on the intelligence community they have six ways from Sunday at gettin' back atcha"
Everything we know is a lie, built from a propaganda machine. Taking a look at history and how long things have been this way is always interesting.
I'm too young for the Nixon thing, but I grew up hearing praise of Woodward and Bernstein all my life.
When he came out with that anti-Trump book full of lies, I immediately realized the entire Watergate story was bullshit, but I didn't know the truth.
Same thing happened to me. His anti-Trump lies that I was certain were lies made me start having doubts about the credibility of the infamous Mr. Woodward.
If he was telling fiction about Trump, was it possible there was more to the Watergate scandal?
Definitely. Did you watch the Tucker vid?
What? It wasn't obvious? Rush always used to talk about how his dad knew that Nixon was set up
Everytime you see a low energy doomer account telling you to just accept election results, remember it's because THEY approve of this.
the country has been faker and gayer for longer than anyone could have imagined.
Richard Nixon was the next to last president to have come from modest beginnings. Every president thereafter, other than Ronald Reagan (the last), came from upper middle class ("well to do") and rich households.
Finally we’re talking about the cia op that was watergate and how the Washington post was in on it.
And yet these same three letter agencies still exist today. It just shows they are above the law and anyone who doesn’t do their bidding is ousted. Only another revolution will work to remove their power.
Guess I was always right about Nixon, I always liked him and he was fucked by the deep state, Guess who was in the CIA when JFK was killed Bush Sr.