It’s like people turn their brains off when it comes to an election: when the game is rigged, you either become a principled loser or a dirty winner. And Trumps only “dirt” is endorsing some RINOs and protecting Operation Warp Speed, and that’s peanuts in comparison to the swamp.
You aren't very smart. Try harder. Understand what someone is saying, not what you want to think they are saying, not what fits in one of your two boxes. Perhaps things are more complex than you can comprehend. Try harder!
He never said anything about drinking bleach, but he backed the shot! Not even the same thing. You suck at this. Go educate yourself, understand false equivalency, and while your at it other logical fallacies, and then come back sometime in the near future. You're not on my level here dude.
Hmmm... if I were a betting man.... I would put my money on anyone of the conservative firebrands other than MTG. and I just so happen to be a betting man.
Motives are unclear, but clear enough to realize that she isn’t thinking of others. She is a shark. Cares nothing of Trump now and used him then to further her agenda. I’m not buying any of it. You want to see it all go down in flames, stick with the one that will throw anyone and everyone under the bus at the drop of a dime.
The FIRST THING she did after being reelected was back her sugar daddy. Even before Trump. She admitted KM "heavily financed" "America First Candidates" (Read hers). She didn't want to fight a close election battle like Bobert so she sold herself out for campaign money!
KM promised accountability BEFORE the election. He proposed a plan but you ignored it and made false claims about him ordering Pizza or being in a "straitjacket" to donors, which was not true according to that agenda. And you knew it before the speaker race. He never was a Mitch McConnell and he mostly supported the same candidates as Trump in most districts. When I saw what he did to fire war criminal Liz Cheney (she wanted Trump to drone Iran without congress approval), I knew he was on the right track. (BTW I know that you absolutely HATED that Kevin McCarthy met with Trump at MAR after Jan 6 and posted that smiling picture because that gave Trump some influence on the Congress and all you want is DeSantis.
No, the FIRST THING she did after being reelected was back her sugar daddy. Even before Trump. She admitted KM "heavily financed" "America First Candidates" (Read hers). She didn't want to fight a close election battle like Bobert so she sold herself out for campaign money!
Trump can't do anything. So he backs who will likely win. If he wins, he backed the winner. If he loses, then someone better got in. You see how it's a win/win?
MTG on the other hand could do something, and didn't. Her votes were immediately and only for McCarthy. No holding out for some concession or anything.
I'll admit I was skeptical at first. But everyday Kevin has demonstrated that he's willing to fall in line. I still stand with the January 6 in demanding anyone other than McCarthy for speaker but it's clear trump sat down and had a talk with him and MTG was privy to what we're now seeing in action.
She was completely open about why she supported McCarthy, from the beginning. She shouted it from the fucking rooftops... But nobody listened. They pretended she was bought, or sold out or "they got to her" or there was some secret bullshit.
The right is the left. Turn brain off (if it was ever on, to begin with). Drink the piss of right-wing social media influencers. React only to headlines, never read articles. Believe whatever random tweet supports your confirmation bias. Pathetic.
Dumbfucks intent on being dumbfucks and shills who fully exploit that to construct narratives that undermine the efforts of our best people didn't listen.
I know this is hard for dumbfucks to wrap their brains around, but it's almost as if there was a cohesive effort on the parts of those actually doing the work in play.
And as of right now he is doing all of the right things. Probably helped people like Gaetz almost gave the speakership to democrats just so it wasn’t him if he wasn’t going to at least pretend to be maga lite
I don't know man, so far Kev's been alright, except on Ukraine - which admittedly is a huge caveat. Even there, he's pushing for audits and transparency, and seems to have pushed that little midget in Kiev to crack some heads on corruption.
I was the "No More McLeadership" guy on here a couple of months back, posting infographics on removing these pricks every day.
We'll see how it goes, but so far so good. It's possible Trump and MTG knew something we didn't, but I still think Gaetz and Boebert holding his feet to the fire helped a great deal.
Gaetz and Boebert didn't have Boehner and Ryan by the nuts, though. There's definitely a distinction. Will it be enough? We'll see. For now, McCarthy does genuinely seem to be pissing off the right people.
The deal they struck means they can basically force a "no confidence" vote at any point, and return us all to the leadership vote stalemate of a few weeks ago. If McCarthy strays too far, I expect this will happen.
I think you are right that Trump has more influence with McCarthy. I think you'll see Gaetz, etc. warm to McCarthy if he continues to deliver like he has so far, but again, it's only been a few weeks.
Yes if he strays "too far". The problem is "too far" is extremely subjective... For instance I think the fact that he has not freed the Jan 6 protestors because at the very least their 6th Amendment right to a speedy trial was violated, is "too far" yet it doesn't seem to be "too far" for MTG, Gaetz, etc...
If we pressure Gaetz and Boebert on this, they will pressure McCarthy. I saw a few general posts on here about them being freed in such a way a month ago, but no organized campaign. It could really work if we target the right people.
It’s possible McCarthy would always do a decent job since Republicans don’t have full legislative power. When the stakes are low, any Joe Blow with middling-to-average conservative cred might do similar stuff.
For MAGA, the time to burn political capital would probably be when/if Congress & White House flip together. It makes some sense not to play your Biggs/Gaetz cards now and be left with a full deck of Paul Ryans later when you need an actual leadership change. Practically speaking, my point is probably garbage (McCarthy gets de facto incumbent advantage) - but it’s possible House reps had that thought process.
He is only acting the way he is because the 20 put his balls in a vise...which im fine with, idc why he is doing well just that he is. Hopefully he keeps it up. Idc if he is only acting right cause he is forced to and he is a rino fuckface as long as he DOES NOT ACT LIKE A RINO FUCKFACE (see turtle boy or ghram)
She said it herself, she got committee assignments and promises, which is exactly what Gaetz and the 20 holdouts did as well.
My issue with her during that whole spectacle is how she went full GOPe--calling people "Never Kevins" and attacking on people actually trying to show the base that voting for them wasn't a mistake. If she had gotten her way, we might as well have Lady G as Speaker of the House while she gets her assignments. Captain Gloryhole would be in charge of Homeland Security committee, we wouldn't be getting any relevant investigations and rules changes, and McCarthy would still be happy with people like Shit and Fartwell.
There was a pic which showed her on the phone with Trump. Trump also endorsed KM (whether for the right or wrong reasons). I suspect she just followed what Trump suggested her to do. But it's all speculation at this point.
No the FIRST THING she did after being reelected was back her sugar daddy. Even before Trump. She admitted KM "heavily financed" "America First Candidates" (Read hers). She didn't want to fight a close election battle like Bobert so she sold herself out for campaign money!
Giving them the right to vote lead to two bizarre events in US history: a constitutional amendment to ban alcoholic beverages, and a constitutional amendment reversing that decision. That tells me we went from rational, critical thinking to knee-jerk reactions that limit freedom AND indecision, traits that women often exhibit more often than men.
Also happened was in trend in monarchies as well whenever a woman ended up on the throne. Since women dont have to deal with the consequences of fighting (unless the army loses so badly they get invaded), theyre always more eager to initiate conflicts.
Good question, I'm not really sure, but the correlation is there. They don't go, so I think they are easily swayed to send others off to rescue whoever tptb say need rescuing. Look how many are so gung-ho over Ukraine.
I dont think it was women getting us into WW1 and 2, rather we were ramping up economy and industrial wise. We were over seas more often, we were trading more. Im open to more info on the theory, and certainly today motherless women make up the mass of the democratic insanity we have.
Also a change in the mandate of government from keeping our enemies at bay to keeping the peace, internally, at any cost. FDR-like tyrants started popping up immediately after female suffrage.
Making enfranchisement based on whether one is a net tax-payer would mean 75% of men could vote (the 25% excluded being net tax-drains and therefore 90% Dem), and only 25% of women could vote (meaning no more single mother welfare queens aka Dem voters).
This would shift the voting outcome just as much if not more-so to the Right than making enfranchisement for males only, and it can be much more easily and logically argued for than disallowing voting based on sex, especially when we have so many successful female business owners and professionals these days who contribute lots of taxes.
This is a pretty decent compromise. We don't need to throw the baby out with the bath water. Women voting, as non-pc as it sounds, has been by and large a net negative for the country. It seemed like the right thing to do, but the results just don't show that to be true. I've always felt having some skin in the game was imperative. We can't allow people to vote to give themselves more handouts. Being a net-negative tax payer should exclude you from the right to choose the direction of the country.
Making enfranchisement based on whether one is a net tax-payer would mean 75% of men could vote (the 25% excluded being net tax-drains and therefore 90% Dem), and only 25% of women could vote (meaning no more single mother welfare queens aka Dem voters).
This would shift the voting outcome just as much if not more-so to the Right than making enfranchisement for males only, and it can be much more easily and logically argued for than disallowing voting based on sex, especially when we have so many successful female business owners and professionals these days who contribute lots of taxes.
It's a rough recollection of stats I've previously seen. Shouldn't be too hard to look up and verify.
As I recall, around 75% of males are net tax contributors and 25% of women are. (Those who are not contributors take more money than they give (via welfare and other programs)).
This will just encourage politicians to make it harder to pay taxes, and to pass the "basic" civics test. As for the voting age being 21, my stance is if you are 18-20 and old enough to defend your country or be drafted, you get to vote!
Dumbest comment ever. Do you see who is heading up the local political groups? WOMEN!! Not because we can't, but clearly we aren't doing it.
Kari Lake is a woman. So is Lauren Boebert. Thank God they are in politics.
Edit: A bunch of do nothing internet warriors are downvoting. People who do nothing except complain like a bunch of bitches while the local MAGA groups are being organized by women.
They only look good because the average man in politics has the testosterone levels of a girl, usually is of below average height and never come from a blue colar background where they actually had to work for a living.
There are more women like AOC and Cori Bush in politics to counter the arguement.
The trannie movement emerged from the homo movement which emerged from the 'sexual revolution' which emerged from feminism which emerged from communism
Dumbest comment ever? Patently false- only need to go back to your comment a day or so ago that you think "there's is a significant threat that Russia will attack the tanks going to Ukraine"
That's fucking retarded. Try being more rational and logical. I know it's hard for you.
The Rino women groups in my area are vastly outnumbered by MAGA women. Not sure what the dems are doing but im guessing they have lots of beta males in leadership as well.
So what are you doing MAGA man? Letting your woman run things for you? Does she cut your meat for you as well? Does she even "allow" you to eat meat? Maybe if you are a super "good boy" :p
Bro it is what you and those downvoting me are NOT doing, which is participating in real life. Instead of saying women need to be kept out of politics you should be saying men need to get involved in politics.
Your lack of involvement has created a void that has been filled by women. If our MAGA women didn't step up, the political groups wouldn't exist.
I never said "women need to be kept out of politics" nor do I believe it. You are just being a feminist troll, and your aviodance of the question tells me that you aren't volunteering, and you probably do let your wife run your life. Do you let her fuck other guys too :p
Hey dummy look at the original comment. My activities are in my post history, no benefit to listing everything for retards who don't dispute that they are do nothing internet warriors.
You guys complaining about women in politics are lazy, non-contributing, gossipers. Your participation in politics doesn't go beyond this forum.
He would make a good VP, I would pefer him as Chairman to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, though. We need good Cabinet members around Trump we don't need 4 more years of Barrs, Milleys, Austins, etc!
NBC has misquoted a number of Trump’s and his supporters’ quotes numerous times, published quotes out of context etc.
There are a lot of retractions NBC has had to issue - the drink bleach quote, the Trump mocking a disabled man, the find the fraud quote from Georgia, the fine people quote and more. Just because NBC puts quotation marks around words doesn’t make them true.
Trumps a hammer, strong personality that can destroy his opponents. MGT is also a hammer. Trump needs a quiet reserved but ideologically sound person he can trust, like a Rand Paul. 2 hammers only work out at Paul Pelosi orgies
Rand Paul, I like him, but ever since he was assaulted and had his ribs broken he has been acting like a bitch! All brains no balls! We need someone with proven Brains and Balls. This is DeSantis! Trump DeSantis 2024!
Both have enough balls for ticket. Need a quiet guy in background helping steer trump in right direction. Desantis trump is overload, too much balls. Both have too much balls to be a VP.
People are too into this "alpha beta rules" shit. I mean I get the message you are trying to convey, but its gotten to the point almost like a religion. They are both great leaders with proven track records and die hard patriots!
Do you think Washington said to his generals, "Nah we got too many men with balls here. I need some cucks who want us to go back to the crown and kiss the ring"? FUCK NO! "You there, Young Man! Do you have the balls to stand up for whats right and fight for this new Nation!? Come with me, I will make you a General!
Do you think any of the Great men of history rejected other men because they "Had too many balls?" The only Man (Or woman!) Who fears groups of Masculine men are Tyrants, because it is Groups of Masculine men who WILL STAND UP TO THEM!
Plus don't think of it as "Just a VP spot". Think of it as a Stepping Stone to DeSantis 2028!
The FIRST THING she did after being reelected was back her sugar daddy. Even before Trump. She admitted KM "heavily financed" "America First Candidates" (Read hers). She didn't want to fight a close election battle like Bobert so she sold herself out for campaign money!
Dare I say it, officially Trump has to win the nomination before he chooses a VP. IF DeSantis gets in, it is going to be very uncomfortable for him given everything Trump did for him for the campaign in '18. Also, he would have to go after Trump and draw figurative blood during the primary which isn't a good thing for the general election.
I know this sounds great but there's no way a DJT/MTG ticket will win. I've been threatened with deportation many times for saying this, but going full MAGA all the time is not winning elections for us, and it's not just because they're crooked, it's because the country simply is not majority MAGA.
You can't honestly believe that the country is majority MAGA. Regardless of the fraud happening, there's no way this ticket could win even in a legitimate election
Yes, especially since poopy pants got into office :p Woke a shit ton of people including a lot of yellow dog dems! If you are reffering to Trump MTG I would tend to agree. If you are talking about Trump/DeSantis, Strongly Disagree! That is by far and away the best choice to win the election and Save our Republic!
Definitely not Trump MTG. Probably not Trump Lake either because it would just become the Election Denier ticket. Trump will never pick DeSantis but it would be better than the other options. Probably still won't win though. I don't think Trump is electable anymore.
Trump needs someone who expands his voter base across the moron general population in the event real votes are actually allowed to be given to him. Greene does not provide this benefit.
Absolutely not. That would be a poor choice for the better or worse she’s very polarizing and she just went through a very messy divorce. The whole tantric sex affair would be 24/7 This would be like selling Sarah Palin times 1000.
Be a waste of a pick as she doesn't bring any moderates/etc to the table. It's best to save that slot to either buy off your biggest rivals (eg. Obama picking Biden) or bring more support to your side (eg. Trump picking Pence).
I don't even like Trump picking DeSantis for VP as that basically takes Ron out of Florida into a position where he doesn't have any real power.
This was the reason Pence was it before and was an exceedingly smart pick. Trump had problems with the bible beaters and neocons early on and he rounded out the ticket while simultaneously being someone the left would want even less than Trump.
Which isn't to say that we need another Pence, the landscape has changed, but this is the purpose of the VP pick on a ticket. Otherwise it's a dead-end job that sidelines anyone you put there. If they run for president later, they get beaten to death with the old administration's baggage. Anyone doing anything real needs to continue doing that until they are ready to run for president.
The founding fathers weren't fucking TV journalists who haven't done anything else.
Lake is great. But she needs to actually do something besides run for office first.
But, yes, it's executives you want because they know how to run things. Governors, mayors, successful business people, even military leaders in some cases, etc. You don't want legislators, academics, or people like that until they prove themselves.
His term is up in 2026, he would not need to resign until 2025, meaning he would miss one year as a lame duck in FL for the chance to save the Nation! If FL is so based they can easily produce more than 1 based governor. As it is, unfortunately no governors are currently really following his example!
I'm still wondering why she was so fast to back KM
Because Trump did I would assume
Why do people ignore this fact?!
Probably because it's a good thing for people to think for themselves.
It’s like people turn their brains off when it comes to an election: when the game is rigged, you either become a principled loser or a dirty winner. And Trumps only “dirt” is endorsing some RINOs and protecting Operation Warp Speed, and that’s peanuts in comparison to the swamp.
That was his fatal mistake the first time around
It's not peanuts to the dumbass MAGA people who took the vax and trusted him.
I learned from good ol Stone Cold Steve Austin, DTA, DON'T TRUST ANYBODY!
He never forced anyone to get the shot. If you do everything someone you like says to do you are low iq
You sound vaxxed. Do yourself a favor and make up your own mind next time.
This meme I made to troll lefties says otherwise.
https://patriots.win/p/141ra9nsGo/i-enjoy-the-reeing-of-the-left-r/c/
You aren't very smart. Try harder. Understand what someone is saying, not what you want to think they are saying, not what fits in one of your two boxes. Perhaps things are more complex than you can comprehend. Try harder!
Lol I guess you blame Trump for those people who drank bleach too, right?
He never said anything about drinking bleach, but he backed the shot! Not even the same thing. You suck at this. Go educate yourself, understand false equivalency, and while your at it other logical fallacies, and then come back sometime in the near future. You're not on my level here dude.
Depends on the people. A lot of people are stupid.
They weren't thinking for themselves... They were following right-wing influencers...
Every fucking time a MTG bashing thread came up here, they knew nothing about the situation, and completely refused to learn.
This. Plus the levels of trolling and shilling that go on here is often underestimated.
Go back to Tel Aviv.
Go back to sucking your dad's dick, faggot.
No they could see this pandering a mile away.
But the incels hate her for what Trump supports. It's not logical. But then again, neither are incels.
You know how I know you're a faggot?
Kek
He listens to Coldplay?
You let guys suck your cock?
Cuddle? What a fag!
Hmmm... if I were a betting man.... I would put my money on anyone of the conservative firebrands other than MTG. and I just so happen to be a betting man.
Motives are unclear, but clear enough to realize that she isn’t thinking of others. She is a shark. Cares nothing of Trump now and used him then to further her agenda. I’m not buying any of it. You want to see it all go down in flames, stick with the one that will throw anyone and everyone under the bus at the drop of a dime.
The FIRST THING she did after being reelected was back her sugar daddy. Even before Trump. She admitted KM "heavily financed" "America First Candidates" (Read hers). She didn't want to fight a close election battle like Bobert so she sold herself out for campaign money!
https://twitter.com/patriottakes/status/1603957141404110850?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1603957141404110850%7Ctwgr%5E893a917c9e06fcde92c8a28c90c52cf39695b877%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsweek.com%2Fhow-marjorie-taylor-greene-transformed-mccarthy-critic-staunch-ally-1767927
Tell me this is the face of a women supporting KM "grudgingly" for Trump and for America, and not a whore gleefully selling out her constituents, America, and Trump: https://patriots.win/p/16ZqdZnTpW/anyone-else-besides-me-repulsed-/c/
good god, fix these shit-ass links. remove everything after the question mark.
everything after the question mark is just data sent to them that identifies:
FTFY: https://twitter.com/patriottakes/status/1603957141404110850
FWIW: the brave browser now has an option to "Copy Clean Link" when you right-click a link that will strip that garbage for you
KM promised accountability BEFORE the election. He proposed a plan but you ignored it and made false claims about him ordering Pizza or being in a "straitjacket" to donors, which was not true according to that agenda. And you knew it before the speaker race. He never was a Mitch McConnell and he mostly supported the same candidates as Trump in most districts. When I saw what he did to fire war criminal Liz Cheney (she wanted Trump to drone Iran without congress approval), I knew he was on the right track. (BTW I know that you absolutely HATED that Kevin McCarthy met with Trump at MAR after Jan 6 and posted that smiling picture because that gave Trump some influence on the Congress and all you want is DeSantis.
You're an idiot.
You can’t write or think.
Mtg is a tranny
Honestly... I can’t argue with you on that at this point. Lauren Boebert though, she’s a fucking 11 out of 10 knockout hottie.
Well, her face does support that hypothesis :p
She definitely looks like one, but I think she just aged incredibly poorly since her voice sounds like a woman.
Yeah she nasty af
Ah yes the big scary incels plotting our doom in underground lairs.
They are frequently committing acts of terrorism. Don't discount their penchant for mass violence.
Name one that wasnt a commie
You're using leftist insults for some reason? More and more reason to be suspicious of you.
Don’t waste your time on this guy. He literally cares more about Jews than Americans.
Yawn
Because trump backs the guy that’s going to win. Why do you think this question is some sort of gotcha? It’s fucking 1000% obvious why trump did it.
Greene I have no fucking clue other than she sold out.
No, the FIRST THING she did after being reelected was back her sugar daddy. Even before Trump. She admitted KM "heavily financed" "America First Candidates" (Read hers). She didn't want to fight a close election battle like Bobert so she sold herself out for campaign money!
https://twitter.com/patriottakes/status/1603957141404110850?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1603957141404110850%7Ctwgr%5E893a917c9e06fcde92c8a28c90c52cf39695b877%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsweek.com%2Fhow-marjorie-taylor-greene-transformed-mccarthy-critic-staunch-ally-1767927
Tell me this is the face of a women supporting KM "grudgingly" for Trump and for America, and not a whore gleefully selling out her constituents, America, and Trump: https://patriots.win/p/16ZqdZnTpW/anyone-else-besides-me-repulsed-/c/
She sold out by supporting Trump?
Huh?
Basically it's only okay when Trump does it.
Or rather, it's only wrong when MTG does it.
Critical thinking time.
Trump can't do anything. So he backs who will likely win. If he wins, he backed the winner. If he loses, then someone better got in. You see how it's a win/win?
MTG on the other hand could do something, and didn't. Her votes were immediately and only for McCarthy. No holding out for some concession or anything.
Explain Oz
Without fraud Oz won
Seriously... What the fuck.
Yeah I know. She is hated for "crossing" the keyboard right.
Is that a Mavis Beacon joke? If so, congrats you made my day
I have no idea
I'll admit I was skeptical at first. But everyday Kevin has demonstrated that he's willing to fall in line. I still stand with the January 6 in demanding anyone other than McCarthy for speaker but it's clear trump sat down and had a talk with him and MTG was privy to what we're now seeing in action.
They're paid to be here.
She did make a case.
She wrote a very lengthy thread on Twitter about why she was supporting McCarthy.
Apparently, she had been meeting with him quite a bit and she thinks McCarthy had some sort of awakening after J6.
I think she's wrong, and fully expect several stab wounds from KM, but she did make her case publicly.
Thank you FFS.
She was completely open about why she supported McCarthy, from the beginning. She shouted it from the fucking rooftops... But nobody listened. They pretended she was bought, or sold out or "they got to her" or there was some secret bullshit.
The right is the left. Turn brain off (if it was ever on, to begin with). Drink the piss of right-wing social media influencers. React only to headlines, never read articles. Believe whatever random tweet supports your confirmation bias. Pathetic.
It wasn't "nobody."
Dumbfucks intent on being dumbfucks and shills who fully exploit that to construct narratives that undermine the efforts of our best people didn't listen.
This, plus GEOTUS was endorsing him.
I know this is hard for dumbfucks to wrap their brains around, but it's almost as if there was a cohesive effort on the parts of those actually doing the work in play.
A lot of the MTG and Trump bashers had "maga" in their usernames, though. So you know they had to be legit.
MAGA1774 was spamming anti trump shit in every thread for 2 weeks.
Lol
Of course. The feats of creative shilling have been pretty out there lately. MAGA usernames must make it harder to spot.
And as of right now he is doing all of the right things. Probably helped people like Gaetz almost gave the speakership to democrats just so it wasn’t him if he wasn’t going to at least pretend to be maga lite
She did it for herself. As soon as she found out Mccarthy would allow het back on committee assignments she was all in for him.
No, as soon as you found that out you thought that.
She explained clearly and entirely coherently from the start why she was supporting him.
I don't know man, so far Kev's been alright, except on Ukraine - which admittedly is a huge caveat. Even there, he's pushing for audits and transparency, and seems to have pushed that little midget in Kiev to crack some heads on corruption.
I was the "No More McLeadership" guy on here a couple of months back, posting infographics on removing these pricks every day.
We'll see how it goes, but so far so good. It's possible Trump and MTG knew something we didn't, but I still think Gaetz and Boebert holding his feet to the fire helped a great deal.
We'll see.
Mitch and Ronna gotta fucking go, though...
At this point in 2014 Boehner and Ryan were "alright" as well. The voted to repeal Obama care when they knew it wouldn't pass etc:
https://patriots.win/p/16ZqmsZqNE/the-only-time-the-gop-acts-conse/c/
Remember what happened when Trump got in? This is what happens when you put RINO globalists in positions of power!
Maybe. I guess we'll find out.
Gaetz and Boebert didn't have Boehner and Ryan by the nuts, though. There's definitely a distinction. Will it be enough? We'll see. For now, McCarthy does genuinely seem to be pissing off the right people.
Why do you believe it's Gaetz who has McCarthy "by the nuts"? It's MTG and Trump who had been negotiating with him for the past 7-9 months.
If anyone is controlling McCarthy, it's Trump.
The deal they struck means they can basically force a "no confidence" vote at any point, and return us all to the leadership vote stalemate of a few weeks ago. If McCarthy strays too far, I expect this will happen.
I think you are right that Trump has more influence with McCarthy. I think you'll see Gaetz, etc. warm to McCarthy if he continues to deliver like he has so far, but again, it's only been a few weeks.
Yes if he strays "too far". The problem is "too far" is extremely subjective... For instance I think the fact that he has not freed the Jan 6 protestors because at the very least their 6th Amendment right to a speedy trial was violated, is "too far" yet it doesn't seem to be "too far" for MTG, Gaetz, etc...
If we pressure Gaetz and Boebert on this, they will pressure McCarthy. I saw a few general posts on here about them being freed in such a way a month ago, but no organized campaign. It could really work if we target the right people.
Any OG tea party member would have disagreed w you
And yet, they would be wrong :p
It’s possible McCarthy would always do a decent job since Republicans don’t have full legislative power. When the stakes are low, any Joe Blow with middling-to-average conservative cred might do similar stuff.
For MAGA, the time to burn political capital would probably be when/if Congress & White House flip together. It makes some sense not to play your Biggs/Gaetz cards now and be left with a full deck of Paul Ryans later when you need an actual leadership change. Practically speaking, my point is probably garbage (McCarthy gets de facto incumbent advantage) - but it’s possible House reps had that thought process.
"He's an alright guy, I mean he killed my family by burning my house down, but he also made sure to at least wipe his shoes before doing it"
Possible? Guaranteed, Trump and MTG know things we don't about a lot of things.
It's just ridiculous.
He is only acting the way he is because the 20 put his balls in a vise...which im fine with, idc why he is doing well just that he is. Hopefully he keeps it up. Idc if he is only acting right cause he is forced to and he is a rino fuckface as long as he DOES NOT ACT LIKE A RINO FUCKFACE (see turtle boy or ghram)
She said it herself, she got committee assignments and promises, which is exactly what Gaetz and the 20 holdouts did as well.
My issue with her during that whole spectacle is how she went full GOPe--calling people "Never Kevins" and attacking on people actually trying to show the base that voting for them wasn't a mistake. If she had gotten her way, we might as well have Lady G as Speaker of the House while she gets her assignments. Captain Gloryhole would be in charge of Homeland Security committee, we wouldn't be getting any relevant investigations and rules changes, and McCarthy would still be happy with people like Shit and Fartwell.
"Captain Gloryhole" kek
There was a pic which showed her on the phone with Trump. Trump also endorsed KM (whether for the right or wrong reasons). I suspect she just followed what Trump suggested her to do. But it's all speculation at this point.
No the FIRST THING she did after being reelected was back her sugar daddy. Even before Trump. She admitted KM "heavily financed" "America First Candidates" (Read hers). She didn't want to fight a close election battle like Bobert so she sold herself out for campaign money!
https://twitter.com/patriottakes/status/1603957141404110850?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1603957141404110850%7Ctwgr%5E893a917c9e06fcde92c8a28c90c52cf39695b877%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsweek.com%2Fhow-marjorie-taylor-greene-transformed-mccarthy-critic-staunch-ally-1767927
Tell me this is the face of a women supporting KM "grudgingly" for Trump and for America, and not a whore gleefully selling out her constituents, America, and Trump: https://patriots.win/p/16ZqdZnTpW/anyone-else-besides-me-repulsed-/c/
We believing NBC now?
It makes me trust MTG even less that MSM is promoting her. Guess she's putting the money from her new Sugar daddy to good use...
Not against it but there are SEVERAL much better options
Like Kari Lake
if they run Michal Obama he needs to take VP behind Lake - he would get absolutely obliterated otherwise imo
otherwise yeah - i think a Trump/Lake ticket would kill
I think the establishment is looking for someone who wasn't involved with covid lockdowns but I could be war gaming wrong
Like me.
Yawn -- get a job / life... This joke is more tired than your asshole
Young man...
There's a place you can go...
Does said place have a mysterious hole at crotch height?
Yes and it leads to a lake of fire
There's two jokes there 😁
Just a shoutout to InfoWars.com
They covered this story, or even broke it, months ago.
They interviewed her and she said she was open to it and she was clearly "angling" herself for it.
Also, fuck yea, she's one of our best fighters. I'd take her over nearly any other current congressmen.
You think MTG is legit? You don't see her towing the company line?
Then you’re an idiot.
Kek
Well you're no fun.
Trump DeSantis 2024!
Gonna need someone more likeable to get that normie suburban white woman vote. I've heard Sarah Huckabee Sanders floated.
No.
No.
7...8...NEIN
Absolutely NOT.
Amounts of NO: all of it
Let’s just make it Steven Miller and call it a day.
Trump/Ye 24
Trump DeSantis 2024!
Care to elaborate?
Trump DeSantis 2024!
how about Chaya?
Get women out of politics!
Giving them the right to vote lead to two bizarre events in US history: a constitutional amendment to ban alcoholic beverages, and a constitutional amendment reversing that decision. That tells me we went from rational, critical thinking to knee-jerk reactions that limit freedom AND indecision, traits that women often exhibit more often than men.
Not to mention the beginning of a huge expansion of government that persists to this day.
And we've been at war pretty much ever since. We just call it by other names.
How did women voting lead us into war
Less stake in the outcome. (They aren't drafted.)
Also happened was in trend in monarchies as well whenever a woman ended up on the throne. Since women dont have to deal with the consequences of fighting (unless the army loses so badly they get invaded), theyre always more eager to initiate conflicts.
So the women vote for congressmen who vote more for war? The population doesnt vote for war, the congress does.
Also, can you show stats that women had a higher approval rating for wars?
How did women voting lead us into war
Good question, I'm not really sure, but the correlation is there. They don't go, so I think they are easily swayed to send others off to rescue whoever tptb say need rescuing. Look how many are so gung-ho over Ukraine.
I dont think it was women getting us into WW1 and 2, rather we were ramping up economy and industrial wise. We were over seas more often, we were trading more. Im open to more info on the theory, and certainly today motherless women make up the mass of the democratic insanity we have.
Also a change in the mandate of government from keeping our enemies at bay to keeping the peace, internally, at any cost. FDR-like tyrants started popping up immediately after female suffrage.
and fags
Women couldn’t vote when Lincoln was in though.
Lincoln started that.
Making enfranchisement based on whether one is a net tax-payer would mean 75% of men could vote (the 25% excluded being net tax-drains and therefore 90% Dem), and only 25% of women could vote (meaning no more single mother welfare queens aka Dem voters).
This would shift the voting outcome just as much if not more-so to the Right than making enfranchisement for males only, and it can be much more easily and logically argued for than disallowing voting based on sex, especially when we have so many successful female business owners and professionals these days who contribute lots of taxes.
This is a pretty decent compromise. We don't need to throw the baby out with the bath water. Women voting, as non-pc as it sounds, has been by and large a net negative for the country. It seemed like the right thing to do, but the results just don't show that to be true. I've always felt having some skin in the game was imperative. We can't allow people to vote to give themselves more handouts. Being a net-negative tax payer should exclude you from the right to choose the direction of the country.
I like it!
Are you forgetting the Baptists?
I must be. Did women start that too? Or were there male baptists that influenced the indecisive actions of the federal government?
"...because Southern Baptists had worked at least three decades to secure legal prohibition. They saw the 18th Amendment as a culmination of their labor. They also had come to view prohibition advocacy as a defining mark of Baptist identity." https://www.baptistpress.com/resource-library/news/prohibition-baptists-100-years-later/
They partnered with the progressives to get it done.
I don't think they had any women leadership during that time.
The women votes got them the leadership required.
The funny thing is most women even of the time were drinkers, probably even more than today.
Repeal the 19th
Idk why but the more I learn about woman and politics, the more I entertain the idea...
Making enfranchisement based on whether one is a net tax-payer would mean 75% of men could vote (the 25% excluded being net tax-drains and therefore 90% Dem), and only 25% of women could vote (meaning no more single mother welfare queens aka Dem voters).
This would shift the voting outcome just as much if not more-so to the Right than making enfranchisement for males only, and it can be much more easily and logically argued for than disallowing voting based on sex, especially when we have so many successful female business owners and professionals these days who contribute lots of taxes.
don't be a pussy
Will you fuckheads stop pasting the same shit repeatedly in the same threads, please?
That aside, I agree.
Not sure where you are getting your numbers from...
It's a rough recollection of stats I've previously seen. Shouldn't be too hard to look up and verify.
As I recall, around 75% of males are net tax contributors and 25% of women are. (Those who are not contributors take more money than they give (via welfare and other programs)).
What about married couples who file jointly?
At the very least, no voting unless you pay taxes, are 21, and pass a basic level civics test.
This will just encourage politicians to make it harder to pay taxes, and to pass the "basic" civics test. As for the voting age being 21, my stance is if you are 18-20 and old enough to defend your country or be drafted, you get to vote!
I agree. Its bad for their mental health as well.
Dumbest comment ever. Do you see who is heading up the local political groups? WOMEN!! Not because we can't, but clearly we aren't doing it.
Kari Lake is a woman. So is Lauren Boebert. Thank God they are in politics.
Edit: A bunch of do nothing internet warriors are downvoting. People who do nothing except complain like a bunch of bitches while the local MAGA groups are being organized by women.
They only look good because the average man in politics has the testosterone levels of a girl, usually is of below average height and never come from a blue colar background where they actually had to work for a living.
There are more women like AOC and Cori Bush in politics to counter the arguement.
It’s because they have been given a higher social status than the dreaded straight white male.
lol and drag shows for kids and trans kids seem to be almost completely endorsed by women.
The trannie movement emerged from the homo movement which emerged from the 'sexual revolution' which emerged from feminism which emerged from communism
"Women".
Dumbest comment ever? Patently false- only need to go back to your comment a day or so ago that you think "there's is a significant threat that Russia will attack the tanks going to Ukraine"
That's fucking retarded. Try being more rational and logical. I know it's hard for you.
Lol retard look up the definition of "attack".
You wrote as they were being transported. C'mon, you can't be this dense.
Sexists like you are the problem. How about YOU try thinking rationally? I know it's hard for most men.
You sound bitter.
You mean the local RINO and woke DEM political groups? Yes they are virtually all led by women. Are you implying you support repealing the 19th :p
The Rino women groups in my area are vastly outnumbered by MAGA women. Not sure what the dems are doing but im guessing they have lots of beta males in leadership as well.
So what are you doing MAGA man? Letting your woman run things for you? Does she cut your meat for you as well? Does she even "allow" you to eat meat? Maybe if you are a super "good boy" :p
Bro it is what you and those downvoting me are NOT doing, which is participating in real life. Instead of saying women need to be kept out of politics you should be saying men need to get involved in politics.
Your lack of involvement has created a void that has been filled by women. If our MAGA women didn't step up, the political groups wouldn't exist.
I never said "women need to be kept out of politics" nor do I believe it. You are just being a feminist troll, and your aviodance of the question tells me that you aren't volunteering, and you probably do let your wife run your life. Do you let her fuck other guys too :p
Hey dummy look at the original comment. My activities are in my post history, no benefit to listing everything for retards who don't dispute that they are do nothing internet warriors.
You guys complaining about women in politics are lazy, non-contributing, gossipers. Your participation in politics doesn't go beyond this forum.
No. Rand Paul or maybe DeSantis or Kari Lake. They must acknowledge election fraud in 2020 and want to prosecute.
Rand Paul!
All Pauls do is talk a good talk. It never goes anywhere. They're the original grifters.
Kari lake.
Kari Lake all day every day.
Desantis may have the leverage
LAKE
Not sure what else you'd want her to do? I don't disagree we all knew they would cheat but what other non violent options should she have pursued?
Fuck off, shill.
General Michael Flynn
He would make a good VP, I would pefer him as Chairman to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, though. We need good Cabinet members around Trump we don't need 4 more years of Barrs, Milleys, Austins, etc!
He's honest.
Something isn't right upstairs with him though. Listen to him speak at any point in the last two-three years. Pretty concerning.
ABSOLUTELY NOT
It’s NBC. Since when do we trust a single word they say?
This right here.
They’re directly quoting Steve Bannon, idk what point you’re trying to make
NBC has misquoted a number of Trump’s and his supporters’ quotes numerous times, published quotes out of context etc. There are a lot of retractions NBC has had to issue - the drink bleach quote, the Trump mocking a disabled man, the find the fraud quote from Georgia, the fine people quote and more. Just because NBC puts quotation marks around words doesn’t make them true.
Steve Bannon is a retard that isn't connected to Trump anymore. Trump even called him a self important loser.
please no. He wouldn't stand a chance with her.
Spoiler Alert...
mark robinson would be better
Yes. Much.
Powerful, based, brings the fury.
Aint but two gendas
Trumps a hammer, strong personality that can destroy his opponents. MGT is also a hammer. Trump needs a quiet reserved but ideologically sound person he can trust, like a Rand Paul. 2 hammers only work out at Paul Pelosi orgies
Rand Paul, I like him, but ever since he was assaulted and had his ribs broken he has been acting like a bitch! All brains no balls! We need someone with proven Brains and Balls. This is DeSantis! Trump DeSantis 2024!
Both have enough balls for ticket. Need a quiet guy in background helping steer trump in right direction. Desantis trump is overload, too much balls. Both have too much balls to be a VP.
"Too much balls"... bruh, after the past few decades there is NO SUCH THING :p
Don’t disagree but 2 alphas? I don’t see Desantis taking position number 2
People are too into this "alpha beta rules" shit. I mean I get the message you are trying to convey, but its gotten to the point almost like a religion. They are both great leaders with proven track records and die hard patriots!
Do you think Washington said to his generals, "Nah we got too many men with balls here. I need some cucks who want us to go back to the crown and kiss the ring"? FUCK NO! "You there, Young Man! Do you have the balls to stand up for whats right and fight for this new Nation!? Come with me, I will make you a General!
Do you think any of the Great men of history rejected other men because they "Had too many balls?" The only Man (Or woman!) Who fears groups of Masculine men are Tyrants, because it is Groups of Masculine men who WILL STAND UP TO THEM!
Plus don't think of it as "Just a VP spot". Think of it as a Stepping Stone to DeSantis 2028!
Trump DeSantis 2024! YUGE BALLS FTW!
She doesn't impress me. She's fired up, but as far as I can tell, not particularly smart. So... Meh. You need more than cheer leader passion.
The FIRST THING she did after being reelected was back her sugar daddy. Even before Trump. She admitted KM "heavily financed" "America First Candidates" (Read hers). She didn't want to fight a close election battle like Bobert so she sold herself out for campaign money!
https://twitter.com/patriottakes/status/1603957141404110850?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1603957141404110850%7Ctwgr%5E893a917c9e06fcde92c8a28c90c52cf39695b877%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsweek.com%2Fhow-marjorie-taylor-greene-transformed-mccarthy-critic-staunch-ally-1767927
Tell me this is the face of a women supporting KM "grudgingly" for Trump and for America, and not a whore gleefully selling out her constituents, America, and Trump: https://patriots.win/p/16ZqdZnTpW/anyone-else-besides-me-repulsed-/c/
Ugh I hope not. Leaders should be men. I say this is a woman.
God bless sensible women like you!
Dare I say it, officially Trump has to win the nomination before he chooses a VP. IF DeSantis gets in, it is going to be very uncomfortable for him given everything Trump did for him for the campaign in '18. Also, he would have to go after Trump and draw figurative blood during the primary which isn't a good thing for the general election.
DeSantis ain't winning shit in 2024, and everyone knows it.
DeSantis isn't going to run against Trump.
FFS enough with the Trump V DeSantis Bullshit! Trump DeSantis 2024!
I would so much prefer another Trump term with DeSantis VP followed by two DeSantis terms with Boebert VP.
If Trump and DeSantis go head to head, its gonna split their bases, and sink both of them. Which I think is the long term plan from Leftist donors
Better credentials than Kamala but he can do better.
Shit you could swing a stick on the street and find someone with better credentials than Kamel Toe :p
Sorry, but, no. absolutely not.
Not just no but hell no.
No thanks!
I know this sounds great but there's no way a DJT/MTG ticket will win. I've been threatened with deportation many times for saying this, but going full MAGA all the time is not winning elections for us, and it's not just because they're crooked, it's because the country simply is not majority MAGA.
Disagree. The reason it doesn't work is Election Fraud. Look at DeSantis in FL. In fact probably our best chance of winning is Trump DeSantis 2024!
You can't honestly believe that the country is majority MAGA. Regardless of the fraud happening, there's no way this ticket could win even in a legitimate election
Yes, especially since poopy pants got into office :p Woke a shit ton of people including a lot of yellow dog dems! If you are reffering to Trump MTG I would tend to agree. If you are talking about Trump/DeSantis, Strongly Disagree! That is by far and away the best choice to win the election and Save our Republic!
I am curious, what ticket would you suggest?
Definitely not Trump MTG. Probably not Trump Lake either because it would just become the Election Denier ticket. Trump will never pick DeSantis but it would be better than the other options. Probably still won't win though. I don't think Trump is electable anymore.
He seems to be leading all the polls, even ahead of #2 DeSantis...
If you pick and choose your polls maybe. 538's average has never shown Trump beating Biden. DeSantis is consistently even with Biden.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/national/
538? Lol no.
Bobert or Lake are much better choices
Bobert voted to send Unlimited amount of our military hardware and money to Ukriane, so NO! Lake probably won't even win in AZ, unfortunately.
Trump DeSantis 2024!
NOOOOOO. DO NOT PICK HER.
DO NOT
Sorry. No more women.
Please God no.
Trump needs someone who expands his voter base across the moron general population in the event real votes are actually allowed to be given to him. Greene does not provide this benefit.
Trump DeSantis 2024!
Absolutely not. That would be a poor choice for the better or worse she’s very polarizing and she just went through a very messy divorce. The whole tantric sex affair would be 24/7 This would be like selling Sarah Palin times 1000.
Yes, and Trump is not known for having people close to him that are involved in Scandals.
Or people close to him who turn coat when the money piles up
/s
Honestly though, MTG is a sellout, we all know that. If she were VP she'd just be another Pence. But she isn't without value in the house or senate.
Agreed. She can do far less damage in the House.
Let’s see those tax returns. They’re gonna ask, so why can’t we.
Be a waste of a pick as she doesn't bring any moderates/etc to the table. It's best to save that slot to either buy off your biggest rivals (eg. Obama picking Biden) or bring more support to your side (eg. Trump picking Pence).
I don't even like Trump picking DeSantis for VP as that basically takes Ron out of Florida into a position where he doesn't have any real power.
This. Someone gets it.
This was the reason Pence was it before and was an exceedingly smart pick. Trump had problems with the bible beaters and neocons early on and he rounded out the ticket while simultaneously being someone the left would want even less than Trump.
Which isn't to say that we need another Pence, the landscape has changed, but this is the purpose of the VP pick on a ticket. Otherwise it's a dead-end job that sidelines anyone you put there. If they run for president later, they get beaten to death with the old administration's baggage. Anyone doing anything real needs to continue doing that until they are ready to run for president.
https://archive.is/2023.01.25-191749/https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/marjorie-taylor-greene-aims-trumps-vp-pick-2024-rcna67266
No.
Don't put a woman on the ticket. I don't know who he should choose right now. Someone like Ronny Jackson would be a good choice.
Nope. Don't do it. Lindell or bust.
WRONG. Sarah Palin taught us this lesson. NEXT.
Plus unlike fake MSM bullshit with Palin, MTG really is a cheating slut :p
Trump will not pick MTG or Kari Lake because he hasn't learned.
He will pick another Pence, someone not heavily tied to RINOs on paper.
On the one hand, he can't do worse than last time. On the other hand, this seems like he's trying to.
I think Kari Lake is a better choice
She needs to actually hold an office first.
Trump didn't hold office first
Trump had executive experience first. There's no comparison between the two.
So only executives can hold office, you better check what the founding fathers did
The founding fathers weren't fucking TV journalists who haven't done anything else.
Lake is great. But she needs to actually do something besides run for office first.
But, yes, it's executives you want because they know how to run things. Governors, mayors, successful business people, even military leaders in some cases, etc. You don't want legislators, academics, or people like that until they prove themselves.
Reagan was an actor
Who ran for president after being governor of a major state.
Trump DeSantis 2024! This is the most effictive choice for America!
DeSantis needs to stay where he's at, as a model for other governers to follow
His term is up in 2026, he would not need to resign until 2025, meaning he would miss one year as a lame duck in FL for the chance to save the Nation! If FL is so based they can easily produce more than 1 based governor. As it is, unfortunately no governors are currently really following his example!
Trump DeSantis 2024!
Her hearts in the right place, and she has some experience in congress, but does she have enough experience?