They have specifically targeted white people from the US. They have said this outloud. They see us as a threat because of our independence. They want Americans dead. They want 500,000 asians and 500,000 brown mixtures.
No one has explicitly said this. However, given the general disdain that the elites have for non white people, this wouldn’t be entirely out of character for them.
What is true is that the American emphasis on limited government and individual liberty is the single greatest obstacle to the NWO, so it would make sense that they would try to wipe out Americans and replace them with third worlders who neither understand nor appreciate America’s founding values.
I believe it.. they have vaccinated mostly western society, are euthanasia in Canada and letting in millions of illegals, while making sure they don't have to get vaccinated. I heard someone say they are even promoting cannibalism.. if that is true, I wonder if they are planning on shutting down the grid and making us do the depopulating ourselves.
Nah, this is a stupid belief that has become fashionable here. I don't know why. But it makes no sense.
One, there is zero evidence that they want to reduce the population that drastically, at this time. None. Zero. Anything people say is evidence doesn't stand up to any scrutiny or logic whatsoever.
Two, there is simply no reason to think that they would want to. They do what benefits them, only that. This is of no conceivable benefit to them - it will be when they have good enough AI and robots to actually replace the people they depend on for their own power and lifestyles, but that isn't 2030, and wouldn't involve killing people off years too early.
Three, you have all the evidence you need already to assess the safety of vaccines and how much damage they can cause. Hundreds of thousands if not millions of deaths, and more years-of-life-lost than the actual virus by over an order of magnitude by now. It is a monumental crime, but the direct damage is just incidental collateral damage, not at all the main thing, not anything like real depopulation at the scale the vax doomies shriek so hysterically about.
Four, it's painfully obvious what this is actually all about. More money; more power; more control - the usual. More control of a final sort even: once everyone is sufficiently on their grid - health passports/conditional access to society, monitored constantly by continually advancing telecom technology (e.g. 5G, and the fact that it makes most of the bodies in most of the buildings in a given area surveillable) and expanded internet surveillance - the end of anonymity, while required to accept body modifications (in this case vaccines) that will eventually lead to actual chipping (for "public health surveillance"), required to use digital currencies (completely controllable and shut-down-ale) and censored (to prevent 'harms to the public' "misinformation" and "vaccine hesitancy" or "hate speech," etc.) and sufficiently conditioned to be obedient to authorities and give up freedoms of movement, speech and association whenever some perpetualized crisis demands it (virus, climate, racism/white supremacy, eventually the existence of holdouts as a threat to public safety), then there is no possibility, ever again, of revolting from their rule and living as free people. They can kill us off then when they get their fancy robots and AI and don't need us to run everything and file the paperwork anymore and we truly do become potentially dangerous useless eaters to them.
It's correct to be concerned about the WEF, WHO and UN. They really are the fronts for the unseen "globalists" running all of this for their own benefit and nobody else's and driving toward that globalized neofeudal technotyranny. But if you're concerned over silly reasons, you are only disserving your own cause with foolishness. How does it look to the normies when your predictions of vax doom don't materialize (which they won't, face it)? What does that do for your cause?
Those normies need you to be a beacon of truth and sanity and help them make sense of a world that is so bewildering to them - that's what makes them normies. If you indulge yourself in pleasing silliness like your vaxpocalypse stuff you will only be an object of ridicule for them, and rightfully so.
Face the fact that your vax doom thingy is q-stage at this point. You sound like "two more weeks, trust the plan." Two more years, everyone will drop dead. Or is it 3 now? How many more years will we have to wait for your two more years or until you stop trusting this weird fad?
I actually think the vax doom thing was, if not glowie-planted disinfo, at least fostered by them. If you can make the people who oppose what the government and the banks and the globalist organizations and the rest of the merry band are doing sound ridiculous by talking about some vaxpocalypse, or "chips in the vaccines," "5G causing the virus," then actual, grounded opposition to the same evil will also be dismissed, exactly as with the qanon phenomenon, pigeonholding opposition into absurdity. Obviously an old tactic, nothing new, and it seems to be in use here too...
They clearly know the vaccine kills. Ed Dowd. Naomi Wolfe data.
They continue to push it.
They continue to cry about sustainability.
They push abortion.
They shut down farms in the Netherlands.
They are stoking a fake war in Ukraine.
They are in record stating the earth is overpopulated
WEF believe in Thomas Robert Malthus and his essay on the principals of population. It states that as food becomes cheaper the population has more children. Which makes food harder to produce to feed more children. This crates a situation where populations grow exponentially and resources arithmetically which causes starvation. There are a lot of issues with these conclusions, but WEF believe we are at a tipping point, even with modern food production. This is why they are trying to reduce food production and quality while at the same time tamping reproduction with the jabs. The deaths are probably a bonus but I wouldn’t be surprised if it was overt too.
Seriously, read this paper. It explains their crazy shit.
Meanwhile, back in reality, there is A) no evidence that they're Malthusians, and B) no evidence that it would matter if they were: the Western world has been on a demographic downslope since the boomers and birth control era.
tamping reproduction with the jabs
Birth rates aren't down like that. The decrease is fairly normal, in line with decreases every preceding year. Even if any abnormality could be identified, it's too minuscule to drastically affect population in the ways believed by vaxx-doomers.
Any population effect is in line only with death-by-a-thousand-cuts slow, longterm demographic replacement, and you have much worse to worry about already in your food, air, water and personal environment.
Seriously, read this paper.
What paper?
It explains their crazy shit.
Your paper won't tell me anything I don't already know. But post it then...
I have. It reinforces my points, actually, as it shows their objective is longterm technological control - chipping, brain scans - he says this - and the like.
And you still think drastic depop isn’t the agenda?
Of course not, lol.
Georgia guidestones.
Why the fuck would these matter to anything? Explain to me why you take these no-longer-existing stones as the voice of the elite. Then explain why the mild content of the stones somehow maps to a declaration to kill people off en masse with vaccines 40 years later. It's stupid.
Statements directly from Gates, Schwab, Soros
Nah. And add Rockefeller if you want. Every statement anyone's ever quoted by these guys does not indicate a desire to do what you claim. Any claim that they did is just misconstrual, like that idiocy over the Bill Gates TED video.
Some of them have shown an interest in population control in the third world, e.g. Africa and of a more general sort that is longterm in nature, like open involvement with contraception and abortion orgs. No one of them has ever talked about drastic reduction plans, at least, not in a way that there exists any evidence of. And why would they tell you if they were going to do this? Stupidity, all the way around.
The Georgia guidestones explicitly advocated that the global population be less than 500 million people. That’s mild content to you?!?
So you admit that Gates et al. want population control in Africa, and it doesn’t occur to you that they wouldn’t want such control elsewhere? They’re more open talking about doing it in Africa because it’s less offensive to Americans and Europeans. “It’s fine so long as it’s not in my backyard”.
“None of them have ever talked about it”. Except they have, and even if they didn’t, their behavior and policies are a silent testimony to their true intentions.
Every aspect of the climate change agenda boils down to “human activity, humanity’s very existence, is an affront to nature and actively damages the earth”. Would not the logical conclusion of this mindset be to severely limit human activity and numbers? Every climate activist, whose ideology and funding often come from Soros/Gates, complains that there are too many people on the planet, or that our current activities are too harmful for the environment. What do you think is going to happen when people with that mindset have any kind of power?
The Georgia guidestones explicitly advocated that the global population be less than 500 million people. That’s mild content to you?!?
Yes. I had a neighbor named Paul who had similar beliefs. Shit, I even helped him edge his lawn as a favor because he was getting on in years and was always a nice guy and a good neighbor.
Think I'd give a shit if he'd erected stones in his back yard with one of his inane hippy enviro doomer messages? No. Why should I? And why should I give a fuck about what some other weirdo's stones that no longer even exist used to say?
Good grief, what nonsense. Are you not even a little bit embarrassed to be trying to rely on this as evidence for your tall tale?
Environmental whackadoodles are a staple of modern life. Lots of people know at least one.
And do you even know the context of your silly stones? The guy's message was in many languages in anticipation of global nuclear war - that was the climate of the time, before people found out about things like vaccines to freak out over too - it was advice to the future survivors of some nuclear apocalypse trying to rebuild not to, once again, exceed half a billion.
Good advice for survivors? No, not really. But, back in grounded reality, harmlessly eccentric, little different than my neighbor, Paul. And with more money than sense to have it built. Like some people built bomb shelters, that's how this R.C. Christian guy rolled. Minor league silliness of no real relevance to anyone but him. And yes, mild
So you admit that Gates et al. want population control in Africa, and it doesn’t occur to you that they wouldn’t want such control elsewhere?
Admit's not the word here. I agree that Gates wants population control in Africa. I am not sure who your "et al" is supposed to be; Gates is a mere footsoldier out in the public eye for the elite, a plausible source of new money in "philanthropy." In reality, the Gates Foundation is a front for the Rockefeller Foundation, which itself is a front for an older, bigger and meaner elite.
Gates is sometimes a spokesman for that interest, but it's not a given that everything that comes out of his mouth is on high from what actually rules the 'Western' world.
But frankly, everyone with a brain wants population in control in Africa. I would hope our dear leaders do too. I would hope that people here would also. You're dumb if you don't.
Have you seen the demographics? The numbers speak for themselves. At the current trajectory, Africa's population will boom to over 4 billion by 2100 - their birth rate isn't falling as others' have. Most everyone else's population is now either stable or falling. Because of development and contraception and no small measure of elite-directed social engineering already.
There is no need for leveling off population anywhere but Africa, and if you are about things like global security, incl. food security, or, say, your local city not becoming Somalia, you would care about Africa's population problem for the world too.
Usually, for those of us who do want population control for Africa, that does not mean "let's kill them off." That does mean, provide access to contraception and development, the same things that brought fertility rates down across the rest of the world - and has not infrequently brought them too low, when combined with anti-birth policies. Obviously, this kind of slow demographic choke we already see in the West, long before any vaccines, and carried out by the elite for their own malignant purposes that have nothing to do with the longterm well being of the nations they exploit, is in fact something to be rationally opposed. But not with shrill histrionics about nonsense, that just makes you weak against powerful enemies who already usually find it easy to crush and smear their opposition.
They’re more open talking about doing it in Africa because it’s less offensive to Americans and Europeans. “It’s fine so long as it’s not in my backyard”.
No, as previously stated, there are universally sharable reasons to promote development and contraception in Africa. Who wants to live in a country where everyone is poor as fuck, has 12 kids, and needs food imported from other nations? Who else wants to support globalized welfare for Africa and the ""climate"" refugee crisis on top of it?
That their talk and philanthropies have ulterior motives is, of course, granted, but those ulterior motives could be, and are, a wide range of thing. Concluding automatically that their ulteriority must now be about your wonderful new whackadoodle belief system, vaxx doom, is silly and unsupported by either evidence or logic, especially after decades of witnessing how that ulteriority has manifested in Africa and elsewhere - bad, but not kill-everyone bad, at least, not yet. What would it profit them to do this now? You have no compelling answer to this. And that's not the only problem you have...
As to the idea that they're, for some reason, disguising an interest in general drastic depopulation - how can that be distinguished that from you just reading your own storymaking into it? Why should it be given any credence? I could claim tomorrow that something in Biden's latest speech is a specific tirade against Russia's nuclear threats, but actually represents his desire to nuke the American South because racism on July 4th 2024. How do you distinguish? Pretty similar...
“None of them have ever talked about it”. Except they have
Prove it. Let's see if you can :) I already know you can't.
and even if they didn’t, their behavior and policies are a silent testimony to their true intentions.
Can't have it both ways. Either they said what you wanted them to have, or they didn't.
As to inferring this from their behaviors and policies, again you have given me no reason to do so,, because there is simply no rational reason for them to do as you claim they're doing. All of their behavior is better explained by other explanations. If you think that your explanation is the rational one as opposed to alternatives, you have to show why. Show why.
Every aspect of the climate change agenda boils down to “human activity, humanity’s very existence, is an affront to nature and actively damages the earth”. Would not the logical conclusion of this mindset be to severely limit human activity and numbers? Every climate activist, whose ideology and funding often come from Soros/Gates, complains that there are too many people on the planet, or that our current activities are too harmful for the environment. What do you think is going to happen when people with that mindset have any kind of power?
It sounds like you're still at the level of believing that these people believe their own message. How much more prime beachfront real estate do you need to see? How much economic obviousness? Every major financial institution in the world invests in a way that is contrary to any genuine belief - financial, not moral - in climate change. Despite so many lining up with Blackrock/Rothschild/WEF's environmental posturing. What does that tell you?
You should realize that the people who have created this mindset you mention in all those frothing at the mouth "climatologists" and their media/institutional cheerleaders, the people who foster and manufacture all of that, already have all the power, and have had it for generations, for over a hundred years. They already did most everything they wanted to with the population in the countries they have direct control over like the US. They made women into tax guarantees for the banks, and socially engineered in other ways the collapse of motherhood as a social institution, and of course contraception and the rest. They're going to do more with a long slow poisoning and demographic replacement, but again, this is slow and imperceptible, the way they like it, not drastic mass-killings that leave them without power. Indeed, they would have none if the vaccinated died off the way you claim they will, and they are simply not going to shoot themselves in the foot like that.
'Global warming mindset' - they have never believed their global warming scam. Because, fundamentally, they're scam artists, everything they are is scamming the public from the money machine downward. They are not high on their own supply, you can't function and continue to be an elite if you are. This is all about the economic and social control 'climate change'-"justified" policies create, exactly like the economic and social control covid-"justified" policies. Cashing in on manufactured crises is their big game, whether it's war or the more modern, 21st century varieties.
And there is nothing to keep them riding high on the hog if they kill off the public whose mind they fuck for a living. How do people here not see this? They simply cannot kill people off and still exist as a great power yet. They need AI and machines for that, and preferably to subdue Russia and other as-yet out of their control nations first, or they will only be committing suicide.
I thought about why. Imagine UBI and no one needs to work because of automation. All your needs are met so what's stopping everyone from having tons of kids and maxing out their family UBI benefit. The elite don't want people having tons of kids. They want to keep people around like you keep a hamster around.
Yes, of course, but that's when automation occurs on that scale. That's not even close to 2030. And you don't kill everyone off decades before the actual time to do so and when you actually still need the still-useful eaters.
Best guess. They're working all the angles, including starvation.
And, if we keep our borders open and allow millions more illegals into this country, the death toll goes up even more.
I mostly agreed but I don't think they want CONUS nuked, they need the farmland
Hoe much farmlamd do you need for 1 billion people?
Time to stand on the street corners with the placard "It's the nuclear war, stupid!"
They'll all be in NZ and laughing.
Are they planning on India and China getting nuked as well?
Without them, they cannot reach their goal, as the US does not have 7 billion.
Putin's not that stupid but the door's always open to false flag self nuking.
Yes its the Globalists that are at the ROOT of the problem!
Most of the people are in China, India, Africa.
They have specifically targeted white people from the US. They have said this outloud. They see us as a threat because of our independence. They want Americans dead. They want 500,000 asians and 500,000 brown mixtures.
When did they say this?
No one has explicitly said this. However, given the general disdain that the elites have for non white people, this wouldn’t be entirely out of character for them.
What is true is that the American emphasis on limited government and individual liberty is the single greatest obstacle to the NWO, so it would make sense that they would try to wipe out Americans and replace them with third worlders who neither understand nor appreciate America’s founding values.
I believe it.. they have vaccinated mostly western society, are euthanasia in Canada and letting in millions of illegals, while making sure they don't have to get vaccinated. I heard someone say they are even promoting cannibalism.. if that is true, I wonder if they are planning on shutting down the grid and making us do the depopulating ourselves.
Yes, they have specially said this.
Which is odd given that the elites are mostly white people.
White people in Canada. US. New Zealand. Australia. Uk. Western Europe. Ukraine. Russia.
White genocide.
Nah, this is a stupid belief that has become fashionable here. I don't know why. But it makes no sense.
One, there is zero evidence that they want to reduce the population that drastically, at this time. None. Zero. Anything people say is evidence doesn't stand up to any scrutiny or logic whatsoever.
Two, there is simply no reason to think that they would want to. They do what benefits them, only that. This is of no conceivable benefit to them - it will be when they have good enough AI and robots to actually replace the people they depend on for their own power and lifestyles, but that isn't 2030, and wouldn't involve killing people off years too early.
Three, you have all the evidence you need already to assess the safety of vaccines and how much damage they can cause. Hundreds of thousands if not millions of deaths, and more years-of-life-lost than the actual virus by over an order of magnitude by now. It is a monumental crime, but the direct damage is just incidental collateral damage, not at all the main thing, not anything like real depopulation at the scale the vax doomies shriek so hysterically about.
Four, it's painfully obvious what this is actually all about. More money; more power; more control - the usual. More control of a final sort even: once everyone is sufficiently on their grid - health passports/conditional access to society, monitored constantly by continually advancing telecom technology (e.g. 5G, and the fact that it makes most of the bodies in most of the buildings in a given area surveillable) and expanded internet surveillance - the end of anonymity, while required to accept body modifications (in this case vaccines) that will eventually lead to actual chipping (for "public health surveillance"), required to use digital currencies (completely controllable and shut-down-ale) and censored (to prevent 'harms to the public' "misinformation" and "vaccine hesitancy" or "hate speech," etc.) and sufficiently conditioned to be obedient to authorities and give up freedoms of movement, speech and association whenever some perpetualized crisis demands it (virus, climate, racism/white supremacy, eventually the existence of holdouts as a threat to public safety), then there is no possibility, ever again, of revolting from their rule and living as free people. They can kill us off then when they get their fancy robots and AI and don't need us to run everything and file the paperwork anymore and we truly do become potentially dangerous useless eaters to them.
It's correct to be concerned about the WEF, WHO and UN. They really are the fronts for the unseen "globalists" running all of this for their own benefit and nobody else's and driving toward that globalized neofeudal technotyranny. But if you're concerned over silly reasons, you are only disserving your own cause with foolishness. How does it look to the normies when your predictions of vax doom don't materialize (which they won't, face it)? What does that do for your cause?
Those normies need you to be a beacon of truth and sanity and help them make sense of a world that is so bewildering to them - that's what makes them normies. If you indulge yourself in pleasing silliness like your vaxpocalypse stuff you will only be an object of ridicule for them, and rightfully so.
Face the fact that your vax doom thingy is q-stage at this point. You sound like "two more weeks, trust the plan." Two more years, everyone will drop dead. Or is it 3 now? How many more years will we have to wait for your two more years or until you stop trusting this weird fad?
I actually think the vax doom thing was, if not glowie-planted disinfo, at least fostered by them. If you can make the people who oppose what the government and the banks and the globalist organizations and the rest of the merry band are doing sound ridiculous by talking about some vaxpocalypse, or "chips in the vaccines," "5G causing the virus," then actual, grounded opposition to the same evil will also be dismissed, exactly as with the qanon phenomenon, pigeonholding opposition into absurdity. Obviously an old tactic, nothing new, and it seems to be in use here too...
They clearly know the vaccine kills. Ed Dowd. Naomi Wolfe data.
They continue to push it. They continue to cry about sustainability. They push abortion. They shut down farms in the Netherlands. They are stoking a fake war in Ukraine.
They are in record stating the earth is overpopulated
Sigh. Alrighty, good luck with this buddy
Its their words exactly.
No, lol. And you will never be able to show it, it's just you and other whackadoodles saying this, not them.
WEF believe in Thomas Robert Malthus and his essay on the principals of population. It states that as food becomes cheaper the population has more children. Which makes food harder to produce to feed more children. This crates a situation where populations grow exponentially and resources arithmetically which causes starvation. There are a lot of issues with these conclusions, but WEF believe we are at a tipping point, even with modern food production. This is why they are trying to reduce food production and quality while at the same time tamping reproduction with the jabs. The deaths are probably a bonus but I wouldn’t be surprised if it was overt too.
Seriously, read this paper. It explains their crazy shit.
Meanwhile, back in reality, there is A) no evidence that they're Malthusians, and B) no evidence that it would matter if they were: the Western world has been on a demographic downslope since the boomers and birth control era.
Birth rates aren't down like that. The decrease is fairly normal, in line with decreases every preceding year. Even if any abnormality could be identified, it's too minuscule to drastically affect population in the ways believed by vaxx-doomers.
Any population effect is in line only with death-by-a-thousand-cuts slow, longterm demographic replacement, and you have much worse to worry about already in your food, air, water and personal environment.
What paper?
Your paper won't tell me anything I don't already know. But post it then...
You must be a troll. About 1/2 of what you say is not what they are saying. I don't even think you have read Klaus's own book.
I have. It reinforces my points, actually, as it shows their objective is longterm technological control - chipping, brain scans - he says this - and the like.
It says nothing about your vax doom fantasy.
I think you haven't read his book.
Na. I clearly posted the name of the paper. You want to be an ignorant faggot go ahead. Doesn’t matter to me at all.
Lol. Where...? You posted neither a link nor the name...
Maybe get the dick out of your mouth and read the first line. Use google, I’m not your fucking librarian.
Ahahahahha, 'this paper' was supposed to mean Thomas fucking Malthus' 18th century essay?
For a moment there I actually thought you might be talking about something remotely relevant.
Ahahahahahah.
Oh man, thanks for the laugh though.
Georgia guidestones. Statements directly from Gates, Schwab, Soros, and others. And you still think drastic depop isn’t the agenda?
Of course not, lol.
Why the fuck would these matter to anything? Explain to me why you take these no-longer-existing stones as the voice of the elite. Then explain why the mild content of the stones somehow maps to a declaration to kill people off en masse with vaccines 40 years later. It's stupid.
Nah. And add Rockefeller if you want. Every statement anyone's ever quoted by these guys does not indicate a desire to do what you claim. Any claim that they did is just misconstrual, like that idiocy over the Bill Gates TED video.
Some of them have shown an interest in population control in the third world, e.g. Africa and of a more general sort that is longterm in nature, like open involvement with contraception and abortion orgs. No one of them has ever talked about drastic reduction plans, at least, not in a way that there exists any evidence of. And why would they tell you if they were going to do this? Stupidity, all the way around.
The Georgia guidestones explicitly advocated that the global population be less than 500 million people. That’s mild content to you?!?
So you admit that Gates et al. want population control in Africa, and it doesn’t occur to you that they wouldn’t want such control elsewhere? They’re more open talking about doing it in Africa because it’s less offensive to Americans and Europeans. “It’s fine so long as it’s not in my backyard”.
“None of them have ever talked about it”. Except they have, and even if they didn’t, their behavior and policies are a silent testimony to their true intentions.
Every aspect of the climate change agenda boils down to “human activity, humanity’s very existence, is an affront to nature and actively damages the earth”. Would not the logical conclusion of this mindset be to severely limit human activity and numbers? Every climate activist, whose ideology and funding often come from Soros/Gates, complains that there are too many people on the planet, or that our current activities are too harmful for the environment. What do you think is going to happen when people with that mindset have any kind of power?
Yes. I had a neighbor named Paul who had similar beliefs. Shit, I even helped him edge his lawn as a favor because he was getting on in years and was always a nice guy and a good neighbor.
Think I'd give a shit if he'd erected stones in his back yard with one of his inane hippy enviro doomer messages? No. Why should I? And why should I give a fuck about what some other weirdo's stones that no longer even exist used to say?
Good grief, what nonsense. Are you not even a little bit embarrassed to be trying to rely on this as evidence for your tall tale?
Environmental whackadoodles are a staple of modern life. Lots of people know at least one.
And do you even know the context of your silly stones? The guy's message was in many languages in anticipation of global nuclear war - that was the climate of the time, before people found out about things like vaccines to freak out over too - it was advice to the future survivors of some nuclear apocalypse trying to rebuild not to, once again, exceed half a billion.
Good advice for survivors? No, not really. But, back in grounded reality, harmlessly eccentric, little different than my neighbor, Paul. And with more money than sense to have it built. Like some people built bomb shelters, that's how this R.C. Christian guy rolled. Minor league silliness of no real relevance to anyone but him. And yes, mild
Admit's not the word here. I agree that Gates wants population control in Africa. I am not sure who your "et al" is supposed to be; Gates is a mere footsoldier out in the public eye for the elite, a plausible source of new money in "philanthropy." In reality, the Gates Foundation is a front for the Rockefeller Foundation, which itself is a front for an older, bigger and meaner elite.
Gates is sometimes a spokesman for that interest, but it's not a given that everything that comes out of his mouth is on high from what actually rules the 'Western' world.
But frankly, everyone with a brain wants population in control in Africa. I would hope our dear leaders do too. I would hope that people here would also. You're dumb if you don't.
Have you seen the demographics? The numbers speak for themselves. At the current trajectory, Africa's population will boom to over 4 billion by 2100 - their birth rate isn't falling as others' have. Most everyone else's population is now either stable or falling. Because of development and contraception and no small measure of elite-directed social engineering already.
There is no need for leveling off population anywhere but Africa, and if you are about things like global security, incl. food security, or, say, your local city not becoming Somalia, you would care about Africa's population problem for the world too.
Usually, for those of us who do want population control for Africa, that does not mean "let's kill them off." That does mean, provide access to contraception and development, the same things that brought fertility rates down across the rest of the world - and has not infrequently brought them too low, when combined with anti-birth policies. Obviously, this kind of slow demographic choke we already see in the West, long before any vaccines, and carried out by the elite for their own malignant purposes that have nothing to do with the longterm well being of the nations they exploit, is in fact something to be rationally opposed. But not with shrill histrionics about nonsense, that just makes you weak against powerful enemies who already usually find it easy to crush and smear their opposition.
No, as previously stated, there are universally sharable reasons to promote development and contraception in Africa. Who wants to live in a country where everyone is poor as fuck, has 12 kids, and needs food imported from other nations? Who else wants to support globalized welfare for Africa and the ""climate"" refugee crisis on top of it?
That their talk and philanthropies have ulterior motives is, of course, granted, but those ulterior motives could be, and are, a wide range of thing. Concluding automatically that their ulteriority must now be about your wonderful new whackadoodle belief system, vaxx doom, is silly and unsupported by either evidence or logic, especially after decades of witnessing how that ulteriority has manifested in Africa and elsewhere - bad, but not kill-everyone bad, at least, not yet. What would it profit them to do this now? You have no compelling answer to this. And that's not the only problem you have...
As to the idea that they're, for some reason, disguising an interest in general drastic depopulation - how can that be distinguished that from you just reading your own storymaking into it? Why should it be given any credence? I could claim tomorrow that something in Biden's latest speech is a specific tirade against Russia's nuclear threats, but actually represents his desire to nuke the American South because racism on July 4th 2024. How do you distinguish? Pretty similar...
Prove it. Let's see if you can :) I already know you can't.
Can't have it both ways. Either they said what you wanted them to have, or they didn't.
As to inferring this from their behaviors and policies, again you have given me no reason to do so,, because there is simply no rational reason for them to do as you claim they're doing. All of their behavior is better explained by other explanations. If you think that your explanation is the rational one as opposed to alternatives, you have to show why. Show why.
It sounds like you're still at the level of believing that these people believe their own message. How much more prime beachfront real estate do you need to see? How much economic obviousness? Every major financial institution in the world invests in a way that is contrary to any genuine belief - financial, not moral - in climate change. Despite so many lining up with Blackrock/Rothschild/WEF's environmental posturing. What does that tell you?
You should realize that the people who have created this mindset you mention in all those frothing at the mouth "climatologists" and their media/institutional cheerleaders, the people who foster and manufacture all of that, already have all the power, and have had it for generations, for over a hundred years. They already did most everything they wanted to with the population in the countries they have direct control over like the US. They made women into tax guarantees for the banks, and socially engineered in other ways the collapse of motherhood as a social institution, and of course contraception and the rest. They're going to do more with a long slow poisoning and demographic replacement, but again, this is slow and imperceptible, the way they like it, not drastic mass-killings that leave them without power. Indeed, they would have none if the vaccinated died off the way you claim they will, and they are simply not going to shoot themselves in the foot like that.
'Global warming mindset' - they have never believed their global warming scam. Because, fundamentally, they're scam artists, everything they are is scamming the public from the money machine downward. They are not high on their own supply, you can't function and continue to be an elite if you are. This is all about the economic and social control 'climate change'-"justified" policies create, exactly like the economic and social control covid-"justified" policies. Cashing in on manufactured crises is their big game, whether it's war or the more modern, 21st century varieties.
And there is nothing to keep them riding high on the hog if they kill off the public whose mind they fuck for a living. How do people here not see this? They simply cannot kill people off and still exist as a great power yet. They need AI and machines for that, and preferably to subdue Russia and other as-yet out of their control nations first, or they will only be committing suicide.
I thought about why. Imagine UBI and no one needs to work because of automation. All your needs are met so what's stopping everyone from having tons of kids and maxing out their family UBI benefit. The elite don't want people having tons of kids. They want to keep people around like you keep a hamster around.
Yes, of course, but that's when automation occurs on that scale. That's not even close to 2030. And you don't kill everyone off decades before the actual time to do so and when you actually still need the still-useful eaters.