The Georgia guidestones explicitly advocated that the global population be less than 500 million people. That’s mild content to you?!?

Yes. I had a neighbor named Paul who had similar beliefs. Shit, I even helped him edge his lawn as a favor because he was getting on in years and was always a nice guy and a good neighbor.

Think I'd give a shit if he'd erected stones in his back yard with one of his inane hippy enviro doomer messages? No. Why should I? And why should I give a fuck about what some other weirdo's stones that no longer even exist used to say?

Good grief, what nonsense. Are you not even a little bit embarrassed to be trying to rely on this as evidence for your tall tale?

Environmental whackadoodles are a staple of modern life. Lots of people know at least one.

And do you even know the context of your silly stones? The guy's message was in many languages in anticipation of global nuclear war - that was the climate of the time, before people found out about things like vaccines to freak out over too - it was advice to the future survivors of some nuclear apocalypse trying to rebuild not to, once again, exceed half a billion.

Good advice for survivors? No, not really. But, back in grounded reality, harmlessly eccentric, little different than my neighbor, Paul. And with more money than sense to have it built. Like some people built bomb shelters, that's how this R.C. Christian guy rolled. Minor league silliness of no real relevance to anyone but him. And yes, mild

So you admit that Gates et al. want population control in Africa, and it doesn’t occur to you that they wouldn’t want such control elsewhere?

Admit's not the word here. I agree that Gates wants population control in Africa. I am not sure who your "et al" is supposed to be; Gates is a mere footsoldier out in the public eye for the elite, a plausible source of new money in "philanthropy." In reality, the Gates Foundation is a front for the Rockefeller Foundation, which itself is a front for an older, bigger and meaner elite.

Gates is sometimes a spokesman for that interest, but it's not a given that everything that comes out of his mouth is on high from what actually rules the 'Western' world.

But frankly, everyone with a brain wants population in control in Africa. I would hope our dear leaders do too. I would hope that people here would also. You're dumb if you don't.

Have you seen the demographics? The numbers speak for themselves. At the current trajectory, Africa's population will boom to over 4 billion by 2100 - their birth rate isn't falling as others' have. Most everyone else's population is now either stable or falling. Because of development and contraception and no small measure of elite-directed social engineering already.

There is no need for leveling off population anywhere but Africa, and if you are about things like global security, incl. food security, or, say, your local city not becoming Somalia, you would care about Africa's population problem for the world too.

Usually, for those of us who do want population control for Africa, that does not mean "let's kill them off." That does mean, provide access to contraception and development, the same things that brought fertility rates down across the rest of the world - and has not infrequently brought them too low, when combined with anti-birth policies. Obviously, this kind of slow demographic choke we already see in the West, long before any vaccines, and carried out by the elite for their own malignant purposes that have nothing to do with the longterm well being of the nations they exploit, is in fact something to be rationally opposed. But not with shrill histrionics about nonsense, that just makes you weak against powerful enemies who already usually find it easy to crush and smear their opposition.

They’re more open talking about doing it in Africa because it’s less offensive to Americans and Europeans. “It’s fine so long as it’s not in my backyard”.

No, as previously stated, there are universally sharable reasons to promote development and contraception in Africa. Who wants to live in a country where everyone is poor as fuck, has 12 kids, and needs food imported from other nations? Who else wants to support globalized welfare for Africa and the ""climate"" refugee crisis on top of it?

That their talk and philanthropies have ulterior motives is, of course, granted, but those ulterior motives could be, and are, a wide range of thing. Concluding automatically that their ulteriority must now be about your wonderful new whackadoodle belief system, vaxx doom, is silly and unsupported by either evidence or logic, especially after decades of witnessing how that ulteriority has manifested in Africa and elsewhere - bad, but not kill-everyone bad, at least, not yet. What would it profit them to do this now? You have no compelling answer to this. And that's not the only problem you have...

As to the idea that they're, for some reason, disguising an interest in general drastic depopulation - how can that be distinguished that from you just reading your own storymaking into it? Why should it be given any credence? I could claim tomorrow that something in Biden's latest speech is a specific tirade against Russia's nuclear threats, but actually represents his desire to nuke the American South because racism on July 4th 2024. How do you distinguish? Pretty similar...

“None of them have ever talked about it”. Except they have

Prove it. Let's see if you can :) I already know you can't.

and even if they didn’t, their behavior and policies are a silent testimony to their true intentions.

Can't have it both ways. Either they said what you wanted them to have, or they didn't.

As to inferring this from their behaviors and policies, again you have given me no reason to do so,, because there is simply no rational reason for them to do as you claim they're doing. All of their behavior is better explained by other explanations. If you think that your explanation is the rational one as opposed to alternatives, you have to show why. Show why.

Every aspect of the climate change agenda boils down to “human activity, humanity’s very existence, is an affront to nature and actively damages the earth”. Would not the logical conclusion of this mindset be to severely limit human activity and numbers? Every climate activist, whose ideology and funding often come from Soros/Gates, complains that there are too many people on the planet, or that our current activities are too harmful for the environment. What do you think is going to happen when people with that mindset have any kind of power?

It sounds like you're still at the level of believing that these people believe their own message. How much more prime beachfront real estate do you need to see? How much economic obviousness? Every major financial institution in the world invests in a way that is contrary to any genuine belief - financial, not moral - in climate change. Despite so many lining up with Blackrock/Rothschild/WEF's environmental posturing. What does that tell you?

You should realize that the people who have created this mindset you mention in all those frothing at the mouth "climatologists" and their media/institutional cheerleaders, the people who foster and manufacture all of that, already have all the power, and have had it for generations, for over a hundred years. They already did most everything they wanted to with the population in the countries they have direct control over like the US. They made women into tax guarantees for the banks, and socially engineered in other ways the collapse of motherhood as a social institution, and of course contraception and the rest. They're going to do more with a long slow poisoning and demographic replacement, but again, this is slow and imperceptible, the way they like it, not drastic mass-killings that leave them without power. Indeed, they would have none if the vaccinated died off the way you claim they will, and they are simply not going to shoot themselves in the foot like that.

'Global warming mindset' - they have never believed their global warming scam. Because, fundamentally, they're scam artists, everything they are is scamming the public from the money machine downward. They are not high on their own supply, you can't function and continue to be an elite if you are. This is all about the economic and social control 'climate change'-"justified" policies create, exactly like the economic and social control covid-"justified" policies. Cashing in on manufactured crises is their big game, whether it's war or the more modern, 21st century varieties.

And there is nothing to keep them riding high on the hog if they kill off the public whose mind they fuck for a living. How do people here not see this? They simply cannot kill people off and still exist as a great power yet. They need AI and machines for that, and preferably to subdue Russia and other as-yet out of their control nations first, or they will only be committing suicide.