The whole reason that women are being called on for mandatory military service ties in perfectly with the WEF, Bill Gates et al.
Every female casualty will lower the birth rate far more than a comparable male casualty. Women can only have one pregnancy a year. A man can make many women pregnant in the same time frame.This is all part of the plan of depopulation.
Devil's Advocate: The drafted women are probably going to be working rear echelon roles in order to increase the number of available fighting men. I'll explain:
Tooth-to-Tail Ratio says that for every front-line soldier, there are anywhere from like five to 15 rear echelon support personnel to keep him armed, fed, fueled, patched-up, etc. Start putting women in those extreme back-end roles (recruiting, training, state-side logistics roles, etc), and that frees up more men for the front lines.
I have read in prehistoric times it is estimated only one in 16 men were able to pass on genes while 1 in 2 women were. Often in some space colonization hypothetical scenarios you would have more females for breeding as a few males would be able to impregnate them all. The concept of the expendable male etc. thatâs why it is men at the front fighting
Oh, yea, from that perspective, the men are winning, lol.
But that's my point. From an Army perspective, it's a loss. What a HUGE distraction women will be if in combat roles. Men like to fuck, and will rape when sent out to the shitty conditions in the desert for weeks, and it will 100% cause major issues.
This because they will have âteammatesâ who canât watch their six and all of the men will be distracted trying to help the women that they also canât watch their teams six. Itâs a disaster. This will also escalate the death of the white race. Women in battle not bearing children and dying in battle eliminating pool of fertile women. Itâs a disaster. Iâm a woman so I stand by this statement. I would do horribly in war and would only distract. I admit that. I may come from a very long line of military family, but that does not make me a soldier.
So, what rights are you willing to give up/sacrifice to fix this problem? Keep in mind if you don't sacrifice enough then the men of your country will not stop the government from sending your daughter to fight a war...
Many are in better shape than the women half their age, and there are equalizers that put women in the Army, - why would this not qualify older folk with the benefits of experience who can pass the physical? - you don't have to sacrifice your breeding age population to a war .
If they're lighter and move faster over rough terrain... I don't see why not because that's usually not that hazardous.
The advantage to service in the military is that it makes people more likely to want to protect their homeland, and instill patriotism in them - especially if they put women into the roles where they are a better natural fit than men (like a lot of the support roles), provided that the women don't use it as an excuse to get pregnant during the service to dodge service while still being there.
Israel doesnât require women to serve, only men. Women CAN serve in the Israeli army. Source: used to work with an Israeli dude who explained this very thing to me.
it should be that only taxpayers can vote. half the population has no skin in the game but only a desire for more freebies. plus congress should not be a full time job, and no perks, no stock trading etc.
I'm going to share an absolute truth. If you want anything to end, make women cry about it. Use the gynocentrism of the simps and white knights against women.
aka Nooooooo you can't Draft Our Daughters! Reeeeeeeee!
That's how voting rights began; with duties & responsibilities.
First rights to vote came with mandatory bucket duty. Meaning if someone's house was on fire you had to help man the bucket line, if not put out the fire yourself.
Other duties included land ownership and proof of taxpayment. Freeloaders, transients and hermits were not allowed to interfere with the townsfolk's affairs.
Newly freed black American men had to then fight for their constitutional rights to vote and eventually black men were given the right to vote, provided they honor their duties like everyone else.
Then the Suffregettes came along, found funding and began to campaign to give women the right to vote. Most women were against it because they thought voting meant bucket duties. But because of a vote where the simps and the bankers duped the well-meaning fathers and husbands into voting to allow it, we have the 19th.
Now women are allowed to vote without the responsibility of having to either go to war on a moment's notice or be denied the right to vote. Tie that to a welfare state that rewards women for being single moms and you've got a permanent underclass & voting block that then gets kneaded into the cultural Marxism of CRT and then you've got what we have today.
I want the people who love pushing for war, love talking about killing men, love constantly demanding others sacrifice for them and believe they are superior to all others to get what they deserve.
Sure. Women haven't lifted a finger to help men and BOYS despite the obvious horrors being done to them. They're supposedly the kind and caring sex, yet let the abuses against their sons, husbands, brothers, and fathers continue without their resistance.
No... why should I accept that you want to send my daughter in to a war zone? Fuck that. If she wants to do that when she gets a little older, that's one thing. But to force her to have to serve because she's a woman? That's ridiculous.
And forcing a man to serve is any different? My kids are still young, but I donât want my only son to be forced to fight globalist wars any more than I want my daughters to be forced to do it.
But itâs an equal rights issue. If men can be forced to do it, so can women.
Because you obviously support equal rights and won't take any of your women's rights away. It does not matter if I agree or disagree. No ody wants to fix the problem, including you; which is taking women's rights away. So since you are unwilling to do that to protect your daughters then they will get sent to fight and die on a foreign battlefield. These are called consequences of bad decisions...welcome to equality.
Nice observation. The 40's was a scary time... people knew what a man was and what a woman was, there wasn't electronics in every single hand.... children received quality education. Wealth generation was growing for all people, not just a few people at the top (the so-called middle class was growing), music had structure and complexity, children were not sexualized. It wasn't 'cool' to be gay and gayness was treated for what it was and is... a mental illness.
You ought to work on this. That might be the last sane moment. The Fifties were where all the current crazinesses started. It started with the Torpedo tits. Nothing normal or decent about that. Once you destroyed modesty, you were on your way to all the current disasters.
It is like unraveling a sweater. Just pull one little thread. But keep pulling, and in time, there is no more sweater.
The Fifties were where you got the sophisticated, red-lipped, heels-wearing woman who made urbane conversation and banter with her husband. She was just as good as he was. She had only two children. Sometimes three children, but never, ever more. You had an almost-movie star for a wife. Glamorous. Urbane.
But that's not how marriage is. At all.
Look into the Forties, good call.
The moon was not yet made of green cheese, in the Forties.
The Fifties were where all the current crazinesses started.
The Custody of Children Act was signed in the 1830s. Earnest Belfort Bax wrote "The Fraud of Feminism" and "The Legal Subjection of Men" in the late 1800s
Heâs saying that if they were in the draft too then they wouldnât be able to use it that way anymore without hurting themselves, so they would destroy it once they shared the risk.
Well, I don't want to die for worthless governments that women voted for, for a system that advantages solely women, and to protect their ungrateful asses.
As they should protest thier own rights to vote. They took our society and destroyed what was once functional (very flawed, but functional) parts of our society and made them not function at all. Women shouldn't have a vote.
Chip Roy is a consistent vote for whatever helps women grift.
Opposed drafting women, supported forced government ID to use adult sites, opposed alimony reform, opposed child support 50/50 default. He has probably the worst record on men's human rights, but knows how to say the right soundbites despite supporting the second impeachment and being generally useless.
Nah they don't hate their rights, they just want to have their cake and eat it too. In particular, the landwhale feminist breeds of the millennial and younger generations that can't decide if they're even a woman or a bobcat.
Those ones love to whine about how they aren't getting this or that, but then cry about having to do or accept whatever might come along with it.
Basically, they just want to be able to demand what they want, have everyone just stop what they're doing, bend down, and hand it to them on a silver platter, and then never have to accept anything they don't want.
It's akin to telling a child they can only play their video games after they've completed their homework, but the child just wants to scream and cry and say "But I don't WANT to do my homework, I just want to play the game!" except they're the adult version, and they've leveraged social support and the authority of the government to make it so they can just play their video game without doing any homework, and then also making it so they can't fail their class even though they didn't do the homework.
You mean women have no principles other than exclusively supporting whatever directly benefits them, regardless of how contradictory it may be? No way, never!
Yea, but not really. The Israeli model is closer to what Barack Obama wanted to implement here, with the civil service force or whatever he called it. Basically federalizing local cops.
Those Israeli chicks with their Tavors posing on Insta are mostly border guards or reserve units.
How about hiding in a fox hole while under heavy fire, you're tired and filthy dirty, and you're having menstrual cramps on top of it? Now that's a bad day. What do you say, ladies? How about changing your tampon out in the field with dirty hands?
Please make sure to build an all Feminist 69 Trans/Bi/Feminist Canon Fodder Brigade. Their mission will be to lead the charge and prove Girls Get it Done. We'll give them the most advanced bullet stopping armor known to man and use them to deplete Russian troops of their ammo.
Women in support roles in the military? Sure! Women in the front line trenches? Youâre gonna get your whole squad killed and then captured and raped. Isnât equality, I mean equity great?
This is why the Equal Rights Amendment has been the elephant in the room in the US for years. They've bitched and moaned about "equality" for over a century, and for a long time, the ERA was something they wanted to talk about - codified equality between the sexes across the board. Then one day they suddenly didn't want to talk about it anymore. Why, it's almost as if they looked around and realized they'd been having their cake and eating it for decades, and having what men have and nothing more would mean trading down.
Oh that's not all they did. There's a second version of the ERA that was proposed. It says WOMEN have equal rights. No mention of people or men.
1972: Section 1: Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
2013: Section 1: WOMEN shall have equal rights in the United States and every place subject to its jurisdiction. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
In the 117th Congress (2021-2022), the reworded ERA bill in the House of Representatives is H.J. Res. 28 (lead sponsors, Representatives Carolyn Maloney, D-NY, and Tom Reed, R-NY). The ERA bill in the Senate, unchanged from the 1972 version, is S.J. Res. 28 (lead sponsor, Senator Robert Menendez, D-NJ).
they can die for their believe and be equal to men =) surrender their right to vote to avoid military draft is an option .. why we never draft women cause they have no say to go die in war ... lol i guess now that they have right to join in on the war they can also join the fight =) /// cant wait for them to apply this in the u.s. as well
Well I donât believe women are equal to men and neither do my daughters. None of us want to fight for âwomenâs rightsâ because we donât want them. Never did. The only thing I like is being able to vote because Iâm actually informed and base my choices on logic not emotion. All the rest? Society destroying bullshit. I LIKE being a housewife and mother that is loved and valued by her husband. I donât want to be a âGURL BAWSSâ cat lady. Women are so stupid, I swear.
No way in hell will any of my children, sons and daughters both, fight for Globohomo. We are anti vaxxers so we couldnât anyway, sorry Globohomo, go recruit Shaneequa, Maria and Chun Lee because these Southerners are not giving another single solitary one of our sons or daughters to your meat grinder. Their veteran father, my husband, is the first to tell them STAY AWAY FROM THE MILITARY.
You don't need voting rights either. Give up your voting rights as women en masse and your daughters won't be executed by our own military for desertion. Men are done playing women's stupid little word games and semantics. We are now more than happy to shut up and step aside as we have been told to do for so long. You get what you deserve and only God can save you now.
Please enlist all of the feminists over here too. ALL OF THEM. Get these worthless, confrontational, delusional shitbags and their equally worthless goddamn simps out of here and go become cannon fodder for their daddy government's war since they love government so much.
wanna know the main reason not to allow women in combat? Go play God Of War Ragnarok and see how annoying it is to have women follow you around in combat and wont shut their nagging mouths.
do they allow cats in the barracks?
Only their own personal pussy (cat) is allowed.
If Women are forced into Combat roles, that's an automatic LOSS on your army.
That's just reality. Men and Women are different.
Not sure you are allowe to say that.
What? Cat?
The whole reason that women are being called on for mandatory military service ties in perfectly with the WEF, Bill Gates et al.
Every female casualty will lower the birth rate far more than a comparable male casualty. Women can only have one pregnancy a year. A man can make many women pregnant in the same time frame.This is all part of the plan of depopulation.
Devil's Advocate: The drafted women are probably going to be working rear echelon roles in order to increase the number of available fighting men. I'll explain:
Tooth-to-Tail Ratio says that for every front-line soldier, there are anywhere from like five to 15 rear echelon support personnel to keep him armed, fed, fueled, patched-up, etc. Start putting women in those extreme back-end roles (recruiting, training, state-side logistics roles, etc), and that frees up more men for the front lines.
I have read in prehistoric times it is estimated only one in 16 men were able to pass on genes while 1 in 2 women were. Often in some space colonization hypothetical scenarios you would have more females for breeding as a few males would be able to impregnate them all. The concept of the expendable male etc. thatâs why it is men at the front fighting
No, it's a loss for everyone. It's a net loss
Oh, yea, from that perspective, the men are winning, lol.
But that's my point. From an Army perspective, it's a loss. What a HUGE distraction women will be if in combat roles. Men like to fuck, and will rape when sent out to the shitty conditions in the desert for weeks, and it will 100% cause major issues.
This because they will have âteammatesâ who canât watch their six and all of the men will be distracted trying to help the women that they also canât watch their teams six. Itâs a disaster. This will also escalate the death of the white race. Women in battle not bearing children and dying in battle eliminating pool of fertile women. Itâs a disaster. Iâm a woman so I stand by this statement. I would do horribly in war and would only distract. I admit that. I may come from a very long line of military family, but that does not make me a soldier.
So, what rights are you willing to give up/sacrifice to fix this problem? Keep in mind if you don't sacrifice enough then the men of your country will not stop the government from sending your daughter to fight a war...
Such a good idea to endanger the potential mothers of the next generation of your country.
modern western women aren't very good mothers.
Double the population of your birthing age citizens killed?
I think, everyone over 50 be allowed to serve, and male or female, get paid extra for risking their life.
Send refugees to war make them earn their spot.
I am worried they will be used by our government on us,
Most 50 year olds are in terrible shape. Youâd be shocked at how, not just fat, but seriously worn out they are.
Many are in better shape than the women half their age, and there are equalizers that put women in the Army, - why would this not qualify older folk with the benefits of experience who can pass the physical? - you don't have to sacrifice your breeding age population to a war .
Especially the Russian soldiers when these chicks get sent to the front!
Tell that to the Viet Cong
The Viet Cong were being slaughtered wholesale. By any military metric, they were losing. Vietnam was lost through politics.
Stay tuned for more sex scandals!
I mean, they make good target practice.
I've never seen a happy one.
Top KEK. IM ROLLN đ€ŁđșđŠ
The bull dykes that roll their own tampons give this decision two Jodi Foster thumbs-up.
The next one will be the first.
That's just so sexist.... /s
Israel uses women, like most communist regimes, not to man the tanks but to surveil and ticket. This is conscription against their own citizens
If they're lighter and move faster over rough terrain... I don't see why not because that's usually not that hazardous.
The advantage to service in the military is that it makes people more likely to want to protect their homeland, and instill patriotism in them - especially if they put women into the roles where they are a better natural fit than men (like a lot of the support roles), provided that the women don't use it as an excuse to get pregnant during the service to dodge service while still being there.
They will be taught white people are the enemy thats all
Assuming their fat asses make it through basic.
Israel doesnât require women to serve, only men. Women CAN serve in the Israeli army. Source: used to work with an Israeli dude who explained this very thing to me.
How about them equal rights?
I'm starting to feel some equality, but I think putting them on the front lines in Ukraine is necessary for true equality.
If they don't want to serve in combat, then they can relinquish their voting rights. That's what happens to men. Fair is fair.
That might actually be the best solution. Mandatory Selective service registration or no voting.
And if the politician you voted for starts a war, your name moves up toward the front of the list?
Just however the selective service works.
it should be that only taxpayers can vote. half the population has no skin in the game but only a desire for more freebies. plus congress should not be a full time job, and no perks, no stock trading etc.
Yeah that might work better.
Voting rights shouldnât be tied to the draft at all for anyone
I'm going to share an absolute truth. If you want anything to end, make women cry about it. Use the gynocentrism of the simps and white knights against women.
aka Nooooooo you can't Draft Our Daughters! Reeeeeeeee!
OK, but it is. Let's give the women the equality they claim to desire.
That's how voting rights began; with duties & responsibilities.
First rights to vote came with mandatory bucket duty. Meaning if someone's house was on fire you had to help man the bucket line, if not put out the fire yourself.
Other duties included land ownership and proof of taxpayment. Freeloaders, transients and hermits were not allowed to interfere with the townsfolk's affairs.
Newly freed black American men had to then fight for their constitutional rights to vote and eventually black men were given the right to vote, provided they honor their duties like everyone else.
Then the Suffregettes came along, found funding and began to campaign to give women the right to vote. Most women were against it because they thought voting meant bucket duties. But because of a vote where the simps and the bankers duped the well-meaning fathers and husbands into voting to allow it, we have the 19th.
Now women are allowed to vote without the responsibility of having to either go to war on a moment's notice or be denied the right to vote. Tie that to a welfare state that rewards women for being single moms and you've got a permanent underclass & voting block that then gets kneaded into the cultural Marxism of CRT and then you've got what we have today.
A bunch of them will dodge that bullet by suddenly getting pregnant.
Good joke. None of us have voting rights. We THINK we do, but 2020 proves otherwise.
If they can't operate a MANPAD at the same proficiency, are they even equity?
Well, they obviously can't. A WOMANPAD though... It's got a built-in makeup mirror đ€Ł
Front lines?!? You got to strap them with the explosive vests like those goat fuckers do to their kids.
I'd probably get banned for suggesting they deserve that, so...no comment.
Well there's a Southern expression "Some people need killing"....
...oddly enough, no mention of this article behind enemy lines in retarddit subs like r\news, r\politics, or r\TwoXChromosomes
Coming soon to the United States. Women voted for it, they got it!
No, spineless eGOP like Chip Roy will always block.
Call me a traditionalist, or a conservative... or just old school, but I'm OK with women not being force to be in the military.
What are you, retarded?
I want the people who love pushing for war, love talking about killing men, love constantly demanding others sacrifice for them and believe they are superior to all others to get what they deserve.
Yeah, they can kill as many opposing men as they want in the war! That should be a dream Jon for them.
The problem is, opposing men shoot back.
Women are better at killing the utterly defenseless, which is why they have the majority of infanticide convictions.
They are also cowards and tend towards poisoning their husbands.
Did you know Biden's last pardon was a woman who shot her husband while he slept?
OOF
So, in order to make the men-hating feminist pay for their buffoonery, we should punish all women? I just can't get behind that... I'm sorry.
Punishing anyone aside, putting women into combat (unless absolutely necessary) is just fucking stupid altogether.
Ladies and Gentlemen... this is how you common sense. Thank you, zooty.
Sure. Women haven't lifted a finger to help men and BOYS despite the obvious horrors being done to them. They're supposedly the kind and caring sex, yet let the abuses against their sons, husbands, brothers, and fathers continue without their resistance.
You associate with the wrong women then.
Well, if you can't support it, just step out of the way and let us move forwards.
No... why should I accept that you want to send my daughter in to a war zone? Fuck that. If she wants to do that when she gets a little older, that's one thing. But to force her to have to serve because she's a woman? That's ridiculous.
And forcing a man to serve is any different? My kids are still young, but I donât want my only son to be forced to fight globalist wars any more than I want my daughters to be forced to do it.
But itâs an equal rights issue. If men can be forced to do it, so can women.
We're forced to serve because we're men. Seems once again, women want all the benefits of equality without the responsibility and sacrifice.
I'd agree with you but the shit guys have to deal with now I think we do need "equality"
Because you obviously support equal rights and won't take any of your women's rights away. It does not matter if I agree or disagree. No ody wants to fix the problem, including you; which is taking women's rights away. So since you are unwilling to do that to protect your daughters then they will get sent to fight and die on a foreign battlefield. These are called consequences of bad decisions...welcome to equality.
I don't care if you accept it.
It's not the 40s anymore.
Nice observation. The 40's was a scary time... people knew what a man was and what a woman was, there wasn't electronics in every single hand.... children received quality education. Wealth generation was growing for all people, not just a few people at the top (the so-called middle class was growing), music had structure and complexity, children were not sexualized. It wasn't 'cool' to be gay and gayness was treated for what it was and is... a mental illness.
Yeah... such an awful time.
You ought to work on this. That might be the last sane moment. The Fifties were where all the current crazinesses started. It started with the Torpedo tits. Nothing normal or decent about that. Once you destroyed modesty, you were on your way to all the current disasters.
It is like unraveling a sweater. Just pull one little thread. But keep pulling, and in time, there is no more sweater.
The Fifties were where you got the sophisticated, red-lipped, heels-wearing woman who made urbane conversation and banter with her husband. She was just as good as he was. She had only two children. Sometimes three children, but never, ever more. You had an almost-movie star for a wife. Glamorous. Urbane.
But that's not how marriage is. At all.
Look into the Forties, good call.
The moon was not yet made of green cheese, in the Forties.
The Custody of Children Act was signed in the 1830s. Earnest Belfort Bax wrote "The Fraud of Feminism" and "The Legal Subjection of Men" in the late 1800s
Ah.
Your knowledge goes back further than mine.
Nice contribution. It's a shame so many people here are unwilling to recognize this.
slide rules still dominated for calculation
People did not accept that 'men can have babies'
It's because he knows the feminists don't want to actually have females in the draft.
They just want to destroy the draft and they know having women in the draft would make it so it will never be used.
Why would women want to destroy a free way to get men killed without anyone suspecting malice?
Heâs saying that if they were in the draft too then they wouldnât be able to use it that way anymore without hurting themselves, so they would destroy it once they shared the risk.
The left has been trying to get rid of the draft since the evil Vietnam War.
Every vote failed because of super conservative representatives.
So they came up with a reverse psychology way to never use the draft.
Add women.
I think you underestimate how many people would support, if not genuinely enjoy, seeing women drafted.
Uh the representatives who introduce the female draft bill are anti draft they don't hide it at all.
They literally say, "okay you refuse to get rid of the draft? Then send your daughter then"
Then Republicans who see through the trick block the bill because they want to keep the draft.
If women could be drafted they would never use the draft again
Well, I don't want to die for worthless governments that women voted for, for a system that advantages solely women, and to protect their ungrateful asses.
Actually, I kind of think they have a point. The draft needs to go.
To add, the Equal Rights Amendment was defeated in part due to conservative women's groups like the one run by Phyllis Schlafly.
What about the women who protested their own right to vote lol
As they should protest thier own rights to vote. They took our society and destroyed what was once functional (very flawed, but functional) parts of our society and made them not function at all. Women shouldn't have a vote.
The draft is evil. Forced slavery to sacrifice your body and life for a government that hates you.
We can always count on good ol' Chips Ahoy! đȘđ§
Help me out here. What did chip Roy do or not do to make you not like him?
Chip Roy is a consistent vote for whatever helps women grift.
Opposed drafting women, supported forced government ID to use adult sites, opposed alimony reform, opposed child support 50/50 default. He has probably the worst record on men's human rights, but knows how to say the right soundbites despite supporting the second impeachment and being generally useless.
That's racist.
I never even thought of that. The Uniparty believes voting shouldn't require ID, but jacking off should.
The uniparty believes in whatever benefits them. No principles whatsoever.
Wtf I love the 19th now
The gangbangs will continue until morale improves
Women hate their rights when the time comes when they most pay the cost of them.
Nah they don't hate their rights, they just want to have their cake and eat it too. In particular, the landwhale feminist breeds of the millennial and younger generations that can't decide if they're even a woman or a bobcat.
Those ones love to whine about how they aren't getting this or that, but then cry about having to do or accept whatever might come along with it.
Basically, they just want to be able to demand what they want, have everyone just stop what they're doing, bend down, and hand it to them on a silver platter, and then never have to accept anything they don't want.
It's akin to telling a child they can only play their video games after they've completed their homework, but the child just wants to scream and cry and say "But I don't WANT to do my homework, I just want to play the game!" except they're the adult version, and they've leveraged social support and the authority of the government to make it so they can just play their video game without doing any homework, and then also making it so they can't fail their class even though they didn't do the homework.
Yep, all comes back to not getting their ass beat as a kid. A bunch of spoiled bitches that were never told, "NO."
Or they had shutty fathers. Feminists all seem to have this in common.
This is a common denominator for shitty people, in general, not just feminazis.
I'm glad you typed all that so all I have to do is agree with you.
Well, pretty much they don't want/care about rights, rights came with associated responsibilities, they just want benefits.
So a spoiled narcissist?
Yes
This is the correct answer.
You mean women have no principles other than exclusively supporting whatever directly benefits them, regardless of how contradictory it may be? No way, never!
shut it down! the broyim know!
sluts
Send them to the front and weâll see just how fast they will stop allowing women to join the military
all fun and games until you get a severed boob in the face going 180 miles an hour
But that's my fetish.
DraFT OuR DaUGhtErs
still one of the best meme themes of all time
They don't want to actually want to draft daughters they just want to get rid of the draft
It's a back door plan
Which is exactly why you support it and making sure women get drafted. Uh oh, consequences? What are they!?
Lol they wouldn't use it if women could be drafted
Archive Link to Bloomberg original article on this.
Have fun in Ukraine, you absolute parasites. Your warmongering finally came back to haunt you.
But I'm sure you'll find a way to crawl out of this situation, the same way that Mafiosi always dodged justice through technicalities.
You deserve this. It won't be in vain at least, think of how rich you're making the feminist CEOs of Northrop and GD!
Trust yet verify. Not my job do to your research.
That'd be the fastest way to up the birth rate, women would do anything to get out of it
It's our duty to say no to them.
Army needs sandwiches too
A+
wow, makeup and snacks, seems realistic, Russians must be scared
I believe Israelâs had this policy in place for decades.
Mandatory service, but inevitably at different standards than men.
Yea, but not really. The Israeli model is closer to what Barack Obama wanted to implement here, with the civil service force or whatever he called it. Basically federalizing local cops.
Those Israeli chicks with their Tavors posing on Insta are mostly border guards or reserve units.
Russian nukes won't discriminate based on gender anyways
you mean nukes Blamed on Russia won't discriminate ...
Wow thats a new one.
Why wouldn't the detonate a nuke in Philly and NOT blame Russia, in order to justify anything they want?
Why wouldn't they just nuke Keev to tie up loose ends with Zelensky and Biden?
I'm sure there are Nukes gonna happen. Hopefully the winds are in your favor
So your world view is Russia would never use nukes
"So what you're saying is" Kathy Newman đ€
Odd take.
Smart recruiting poster. Too bad so many of their recruits are gay
Hopefully ukraine is wiped off the map soon
Any year now
I'm gonna go tell my wife and see what she says (she's 41, so at the shitty end of conscription when your knees and back already hurt)...
"Some people would be happy, but not me" was the answer. "I'll be a cook"
I heard KP doesn't really exist anymore, that the branches in the US have civilian contractors... is that really true?
How about hiding in a fox hole while under heavy fire, you're tired and filthy dirty, and you're having menstrual cramps on top of it? Now that's a bad day. What do you say, ladies? How about changing your tampon out in the field with dirty hands?
Based on this picture Iâm thinking of making a Viking ship and conquering Denmark
No just raid and kidnap their women.
Please make sure to build an all Feminist 69 Trans/Bi/Feminist Canon Fodder Brigade. Their mission will be to lead the charge and prove Girls Get it Done. We'll give them the most advanced bullet stopping armor known to man and use them to deplete Russian troops of their ammo.
And nothing of worth will be lost.
Women in support roles in the military? Sure! Women in the front line trenches? Youâre gonna get your whole squad killed and then captured and raped. Isnât equality, I mean equity great?
Bro if the chick's looked like that in the Marines... I would've stayed the full 20 years lol
Just remember: some man, somewhere, is tired of her shit.
A new STD for each year of service!
This is why the Equal Rights Amendment has been the elephant in the room in the US for years. They've bitched and moaned about "equality" for over a century, and for a long time, the ERA was something they wanted to talk about - codified equality between the sexes across the board. Then one day they suddenly didn't want to talk about it anymore. Why, it's almost as if they looked around and realized they'd been having their cake and eating it for decades, and having what men have and nothing more would mean trading down.
Oh that's not all they did. There's a second version of the ERA that was proposed. It says WOMEN have equal rights. No mention of people or men.
Equal rights, equal fights.
they can die for their believe and be equal to men =) surrender their right to vote to avoid military draft is an option .. why we never draft women cause they have no say to go die in war ... lol i guess now that they have right to join in on the war they can also join the fight =) /// cant wait for them to apply this in the u.s. as well
Well I donât believe women are equal to men and neither do my daughters. None of us want to fight for âwomenâs rightsâ because we donât want them. Never did. The only thing I like is being able to vote because Iâm actually informed and base my choices on logic not emotion. All the rest? Society destroying bullshit. I LIKE being a housewife and mother that is loved and valued by her husband. I donât want to be a âGURL BAWSSâ cat lady. Women are so stupid, I swear.
No way in hell will any of my children, sons and daughters both, fight for Globohomo. We are anti vaxxers so we couldnât anyway, sorry Globohomo, go recruit Shaneequa, Maria and Chun Lee because these Southerners are not giving another single solitary one of our sons or daughters to your meat grinder. Their veteran father, my husband, is the first to tell them STAY AWAY FROM THE MILITARY.
You don't need voting rights either. Give up your voting rights as women en masse and your daughters won't be executed by our own military for desertion. Men are done playing women's stupid little word games and semantics. We are now more than happy to shut up and step aside as we have been told to do for so long. You get what you deserve and only God can save you now.
No more brother wars
Danes are hot ladies
Indeed
Imho the last 2 years of high school should be 2 years in some level of reserve or state guard.
Imagine combining everything that sucks about public schools with everything that sucks about compulsory military service.
Wouldn't be compulsory, you just wouldn't get a diploma. Might do these degenerates well to have some structure.
We might be witnessing a true red-pilling of women.
They'll just do their usual shady tricks to escape, then double down on sending more men because of how close they came to getting what they deserve.
God, I wish this was wrong. I truly do. But it isnât.
It's so typical of women. Whenever they get close to a setback, they weasel out of it and double down to avoid ever being that close again.
No, I doubt it.
KEK as if
Draft our daughters!
OG
Please enlist all of the feminists over here too. ALL OF THEM. Get these worthless, confrontational, delusional shitbags and their equally worthless goddamn simps out of here and go become cannon fodder for their daddy government's war since they love government so much.
wanna know the main reason not to allow women in combat? Go play God Of War Ragnarok and see how annoying it is to have women follow you around in combat and wont shut their nagging mouths.
Hopefully the female sailors donât have dicks
I'll house that hottie in the pic here in the states.