1990 BREAKING: Pfizer RESPONDS! “We definitely don’t do gain of function except when we do” (media.patriots.win) posted 60 days ago by NotAGlowy 60 days ago by NotAGlowy +1993 / -3 139 comments download share 139 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
IT'S DIRECTED EVOLUTION, YOU ABSOLUTE BIGOT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Extremely careless, not gross negligence.
And the sheep parroted this talking point with not a single bit of coherent thought or questioning.
There are times when I hate the English language.
And now i sit here and laugh every time someone “died suddenly” and say can you imagine how much worse it could have been 😂
Check out this part from the third paragraph:
“It is important to note that these studies are required by U.S. and global regulators for all antiviral products and are carried out by many companies and academic institutions in the U.S. and around the world.”
“…many companies and academic institutions in the U.S. and around the world…” are developing bioweapons. Got it.
“DEVELOPING BIOWEAPONS IS REQUIRED BY THE US GIVERMENT”
I’m leaving the spelling error
Fits with their previously stated rational
Phizer says it’s okay to lie about their testing. The government is in on it https://rumble.com/v18ie08-attorney-robert-barnes-who-represents-brook-jacksons-case-against-pfizer.html
Freudian, I think.
Gibs me dat bioweapon. It's a human right, fascist!
Not every death is a result of clot shots, but using the COVID standard, anyone who got the clot shot or has symptoms of having gotten the clot shot, must be included in clot shot death counts.
Exactly im using their standard. The covid death counter on cnn. So everyone that dies and was jabbed is died of the jab.
They really wish we hadn’t insisted on being the control group.
no need to hate english. fact is in most states the average literacy level is below 6th grade. its fucking frightening.
Neither careless nor negligence. Fully planned, coordinated, and knowingly executed
Have the Clintons ever figured out the meaning of what 'IS' is?
“What difference at this point does it make?”
No reasonable prosecutor
IT IS INTENTIONAL!
Comey equivocates observed behavior to avoid the consequences of the action.
Let us distract you from the evolution reee
More word play, lying, and propaganda from this marxist corporation. shocker.
This shit is fucking retarded. If Pfizer can just rename everything they do in order to skirt any law directed at restricting their activity, then they are literally above the law. Someone needs to put a stop to this immediately. Ideally, that someone would be our government. If not them, then anyone else is also fine.
I didn’t STEAL your car. In a limited number of cases it may have been engineered to leave your property…
I didn't STEAL your car, I just sat in the driver's seat, pulled some wires down and started the car, then depressed the pedal and drove off. How can you be so racially insensitive?
I took your car for an undocumented drive
Your car did not resist.
your car identifies as my car
This made me lol
happy to provide a chuckle or two
Well what do you want,
if you didn't want them to borrow it,
you shouldn't have placed it in the DRIVEway.
And after all, we took it down the PARKway
I didn’t CARJACK you, I provided you with unplanned VALET SERVICE.
I didn’t rape your wife. I simply inserted my penis and moved it back and forth.
you were just subverting my sexual expectations
Ha. That’s great.
That's what all these cultural dipshits are saying about narratives from Hollywood (The Last Jedi, et al) to video games (FF7 Remake).
Nah, my extremely attractive girlfriend / boyfriend isn't cheating, they're just subverting my relationship expectations.
Spez: And the fictional narratives they try to defend are shlock-y garbage. It's just another use of cultural marxist wordplay to try and hail something mediocre as good.
That's the excuse they use when you miss two payments, on your Tesla, and it drives itself back to the dealership.
I can't wait until all vehicles can do this.
We at Pfizer do not steal cars, we have Gain of Transportation protocols in order to affect homosexual mobility in negroid populations.
The guy admitted they are above the law because the same people that are supposed to be watching them are future employees.
the CARES and PREP Act indemnified these vax manufacturers.
Albert Bourla is very pleased about it too.
No no, they are not above the law. They are the ones that write the law. They are the law
It’s called policy driven science
I prefer policy driven "science."
I respect objective science. But we haven't seen that in 200 years.
I am going to use this logic with the new unconsitutional pistol brace ruling by the ATF. Nope sorry ATF its not a pistol brace, that is a shoulder augmentation of mine. I need it for health reasons.
Copy/pasting my comment from the other thread:
I personally think they're straight-up lying (because what they do is so bad that being caught for lying about it is the least of their worries), but they also crafted their statement to be as misleading as possible in at least three ways:
First, Jordon Trishton Walker didn't even claim that Pfizer is doing directed evolution research, but that they discussed doing it to create new variants to create new vaccines to profit from.
Pfizer carefully omitted commenting on whether or not they have had any of these discussions, and they obfuscated their omission with a wall of text intended to be as "boring-sounding" as possible.
Second, Pfizer couches their denial of gain-of-function and directed evolution research in the narrowest sense possible: Their denial only applies to "the ongoing development of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine." Their denial does not apply to anything else they have ever done, anything else they else they are currently doing, discussions of future plans even in relation to the same vaccines, etc.
Third, Pfizer even admits within that wall of text that:
Right there, the first sentence admits that they're doing gain-of-function research, when they also claimed otherwise above. Clearly, they're playing semantic games here and redefining the meaning of gain-of-function research (as Fauci does) to escape accountability.
The second sentence admits to a limited form of directed evolution research, but I guess it "doesn't count" if it's in vitro or necessary for regulatory purposes.
Importantly, notice how they start with the more shocking admission (engineering viruses), and then they follow it up with something that sounds more mundane that is required for regulatory purposes. They then end the whole paragraph with a statement about how "these studies are required by U.S. and global regulators for all antiviral products."
Do you see what they did there? The regulatory requirement only applies to the in vitro resistance selection experiments, NOT to engineering viruses, but they constructed the paragraph to sound ambiguous, as if regulation requires both.
That’s a sound sit-rep
So... that means some of this is absolutely NOT computer simulations.
And considering how vaguely one could define most (spend $1 million on a computer doing 1 million "simulations" compared to $50 million on actual, live research), this statement is probably worse than if they said nothing at all. The way it's worded, they could still be doing pretty much anything.
Did you know that a person who did computations back in the 1800s and early 20th century were called computers?
They computed things, hense they were computers.
So technically, they could potentially call these experiments as computer generated experiments, or some such phrase, as long as they also added 2+2 together.
Released on a Friday night at 8pm. Sounds about right.
LOL, translation "Yes, we do mutate and manipulate viruses, but we don't know if it creates any gain of function, so trust us 👌"
Thanks for being a force multiplier. You saved several hundred of us on team MAGA probably a quarter hour each.
I don't understand why the "orlandos" of this site can't spend an extra 30 seconds to remove the need to do duplicate work.
Thanks. We should do what we can to empower our side.
Also, if it was you, thank you for archiving ASAP.
I can use a cached copy to help me demoralize the left behind enemy lines, making it that much harder for Pfizer to make this item "disappear" or to do some kind of stealth edit.
Seems they even control this site.
Palestine is our greatest ally. 🤣
I want foreign nations to fuck off and leave me alone, rather than push white genocide through their control of my mainstream media and social media and government and attempt to destroy my traditional Christian culture by attempting to normalize the entire rainbow of sexual degeneracy.
Palestine has never done any of that to me or my country or my culture or my race.
I've sat through enough corporate meetings to know exactly what this is.
Thank god the important information is circled in red and there’s a ton of red text that blocks out a bunch of shit! Otherwise I might make my own opinion!
Pfizer is a demonic company that needs to be splintered in a thousand pieces and scattered in the wind
Directed evolution, not gain of function.
And we totes did not create these variations and release them so we could sell vaccines that destroy your immune system and make you more vulnerable to the next variation that we certainly will not create and release.
It's just something we talked about in a meeting once.
We would never DO it.
That would be wrong.
Your place or mine?
DIE "Director" of development. Imagine being an actual scientist working under this guy. And we're seeing it all over corporate America.
Yep that’s his story. Yale, fast track to leadership position at a major company… he’s an ESG recipient big time because he checks two boxes for one guy. A “twofer”.
BTW I appreciate that you said “DIE”. I do that too.
Is there a version where there’s not a giant red line through a critical line of text?
“In a limited number of cases when a full virus does not contain any known gain of function mutations, such virus may be engineered to enable the assessment of antiviral activity in cells. In addition, in vitro resistance selection experiments are undertaken in cells incubated with SARS-CoV-2 and nirmatrelvir in our secure Biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratory…”
Any known gain of function mutations?! If you knew what they were, it wouldn’t be research! So they do gain of function research, they just don’t know it’s gain of function until after they do the research though so it’s cool!
Your car was not stolen, we performed engineering on it that our lawyers did not recognize as stealing. Now your car is on a ship to Cuba.
This is a good life lesson. If you make up your own words and definitions, you can't get in trouble.
"What's the definition of is?" - Bill Clinton
Well that makes me feel better. Thanks Pfizer.
Okey dokey, lemme see if I got this right...
Unnamed Pfizer source says (is this you, N. Trashtown Walker?) unnamed collaborators working with unnamed public health authorities do research as required by unnamed US and global regulators.
And this research is carried out by many unnamed companies and academic institutions in the US along with other unnamed countries around the world.
And for transparency, the theoretical results are published in unnamed peer reviewed scientific journals, with no mention of the results of the peer's success at reproducibility or replicability of their findings.
Findings are all based on factual theories (informative data points) established deeply and firmly (rooted) in junk science (wiki redirect from 'sound science' query)
And finally Mr Pfizer concludes that this work is an absolute necessity (vitally important) to overcome the plandemic. This is Pfizer’s commitment to transparency, and a claimed assist to the turd in it’s pocket, or the other unnamed cohort implied, in an effort to ease (alleviate) the great destructive (devastating) heavy load (burden) of this disease. Because ScIeNcE?
COVID is a disease diagnosis. SARS-CoV-2 is the virus that causes the disease.
Thanks for the clarification. I learned something today =)
I took the vax to protect family members. This was before we knew about all the side effects.
I cannot protect my family members if I’m dead. I knew the covid narrative was bullshit, I supposedly had it and it was nothing. So when they started pushing the shots I didn’t trust it, even with Trumps approval, I deduced something was wrong.
A lot of good people did. There was an unimaginable psyop.
Leave Pfizer alone. They said they don’t do that. We have to trust them
The folks running APStylebook's Twitter is working overtime.
they haven't, but a guy they know did. They probably outsource it to another lab
It's the "You used our jargon incorrectly, nyah, nyah, nyah" defense.
RELEASE THE KRAKEN!
Remember back when people spoke plainly instead of in shitty, lawyerish double speak like a Clinton? 🤦🏼
Pfizer scientist caught on tape admitting this: https://youtu.be/ex19Pm1i2cs
It took them two full days of crazed effort to come up with these multilayered levels of obfuscation. Publish or perish. Come up with something or don’t come to work on Monday—you’ll be fired.
Sooooooo … Here. We. Go!
The Clif Notes of Pfizer Pharma Pfraud!!!
Longer because O’Keefe always gives his targets an opportunity to comment before releasing the story. Also his confrontation with his mark was prior to the release. So throw in at least an extra day, probably more.
nothing a "delete" button and burning the any form of evidence before the Republican Congress step in to investigate ...
Different concepts, idiot. Don't conflate them. You end up with a different virus either way. One is engineered to be 1000x "worse" in some way by gene editing, and the other is forcibly mutated in animals to create something different that requires a new immune response. O'Keefe didn't understand this simple concept either when he confronted the nutjob. That gives Pfizer room to make this crooked political statement (they were handed a strawman to beat) and the MSM something to run with. One way or another, they are intending to create new viruses to have an excuse to force more injections.
So they just confirmed the veritas video. That last part about U.S. regulators being required, is that true? IF so why did Pfizer deny India the right to study the Pfizer jabs?
We need to stop getting caught up in the naming of it. Mess with a virus and make it more virulent/transmissible/deadly you deserve whatever comes.
and don't lose track of Definitions ... as Liberals ALWAYS alter basic definitions routinely ... for their own benefit - and to attack their enemies.
'Gain of Function' research and lab experimentation is NOT a narrow scope of work... It covers a very WIDE scope of lab research ... covering mostly virus and bacteria areas but also 'any plant or animal'... It genetically forms NEW, IMPROVED, (or more Dangerous) or more altered Biological response functions in all kinds of life forms.
It is NOT NEW ... the concept was debated hotly back in the 1980's and 1990's ... So Dangerous is this research that GoF is part of International Peace/Defense Treaties!!! It can obviously be used in Bio-Warfare research - Most of the public is blind to this type of work... but DARPA and the DOD and most advanced Nations know exactly what they are doing when they experiment in this field. And there is a real risk of a 'real' Pandemic, that has a very high mortality rate - with high rates of contagiousness - which could sweep the Planet - similar to the Plague that hit Europe centuries back (that incident killed about a 1/3 of Europe.)
And Pfizer and Fauci and Peter Paszak and DOD and China and many others - do not care... and just want the money.
In a sane, just world, the government would be forcing them to cease all operations so that a full inspection could take place. People would be led out in handcuffs.
This timeline sucks.