But the science says Africa is the most genetically diverse place in the world. That's why they are black, because occasional mutations like white skin or blue eyes cannot survive to the next generations without some inbreeding.
It's not the strong that will survive. It's those without ethics or morals. Those who play by the rules lose to those who don't. There are brief periods in our history where the strongest with morals happened to be way stronger than those without, but then as we see we just revert back to the norm.
Morals and Ethics are strength, which is why the people who held to them were able to out compete those who did not and why they're now the norm. Anyone who declares otherwise is a dumbass who can't see anything past their over inflated opinions of themselves.
Not really, not in the situation this string of comments is describing.
Sure, in a civilized and polite society morals and ethics are strength. But we're talking about a societal collapse scenario where there are mass die offs, strife, war, starvation etc.,
In that situation the only thing that matters is if you're willing to do what you need to do in order to survive, that's the only real strength there is.
Because everyone will turn against each other, there will no longer be communities or large groups. You might have some small groups of a dozen or so people at most who work together, but even that will be suspect. Most people won't be able to trust outside of their immediate family.
An example would be, imagine you and your family are starving because everything has gone to shit. You're looking for food daily. You come across a crashed vehicle with corpses inside, but it looksl ike they were running away from something with their supplies.
You find cans of food in the back.
You can feed your family.
Then, here comes a dude out of the bushes with an AK47, he wants your food.
You can show him all the morals and ethics you want, offering to share with him, being a "good citizen", but he has a family to feed too. And he's willing to do whatever is necessary to survive and keep them alive.
So he clapps your cheeks and leaves you bleeding on the road, and takes the food for himself.
you're describing a walking dead scenario. that's not how even a plurality of history has played out. even in mass natural disasters.
sure there would be many faggot opportunists. those would be sorted out fairly quickly as they cant trust or be trusted.
if things got so desperate, then sure, maybe it would be hell, everyone against everyone, for a little while, in some places. (populations of 100k+ cities)
most places in the US would be factions of churches working together for food security and sanity.
eventually, other factions of God fearing men will band together and rebuild.
morals are given to man from God to separate us from the animals. not saying there wont be some HARD and brutal calls to defense and security. but such is war.
I mean, keep telling yourself that and keep clutching your pearls and beating your bible, it's no skin off my back. I'm certain it will all work out for you.
it will. always has for us. sacrifice and love for the sanctity of life outlasts the nihilists like you who normally take themselves out when things get too tough.
Because everyone will turn against each other, there will no longer be communities or large groups. You might have some small groups of a dozen or so people at most who work together, but even that will be suspect. Most people won't be able to trust outside of their immediate family.
But actual evidence shows people in such events tend to form larger groups and some form of local governments and police forces.
I guess that's why they kept tossing people into gulags during the soviet union, and why neighbors turned on neighbors and even family turned on family out of fucking paranoia.
You certainly know what you're talking about, please, let me bow down to your superior knowledge, and please take the podium, for I have been humbled by your greatness.
But we're talking about a societal collapse scenario
There was no societal collapse around 1937 when people were tossed into gulags en mass, it was big organized government doing it against individuals and small groups.
I guess you've got a pretty fucked up sense of what constitutes a societal collapse then.
Personally, I think when people start resorting to cannibalism so they don't starve and freeze to death, thats every bit of a societal collapse in all meaningful measures.
Plenty of former USSR Ukrainians would agree, if they weren't in mass graves.
But since you know better, there's no point in even discussing that.
Then, here comes a dude out of the bushes with an AK47, he wants your food.
He may succeed once or twice, but eventually some larger group of dudes with AK-s will find him. And this group will only take 30-50% of your food for 'protection'.
There are a lot of fucking stupid people on this site now. I swear half of them spend their time bible thumping and screaming about shit they have no understanding of whatsoever, but suffer from such dunning-kruger they actually believe they're winning arguments.
It has really started to be a turnoff here. This place used to be pretty intelligent, but has suffered immense brain drain.
Follow along, Einstein. Itโs not difficult to possess basic reading comprehension.
Guy1 is making the case that itโs not strength that matters- unethical people will thrive because theyโre willing to do unethical things.
Guy2 is making the rebuttal that ethics ARE strength.
My extremely sound argument points out that a historically strong AND ethical people, the Spartans, survived against far more barbarous and unethical enemies precisely because they were ruthlessly willing to keep their people strong even if it meant doing so called unethical things in the name of a greater good.
As to your painfully stupid response- if a boat is sinking and the only way to save it is to throw the weak and sick overboard - would you prefer instead that everyone drown? Is that โethicalโ to you? Youโre an absolute fucking moron.
All joking aside, its only got to be a matter of time before Greta discovers close encounters with One Eye. I'm betting her handlers are working hard to delay that event.
Only a matter of time before she's dragging the monster cyclops to tuna cavern! Then it's "yeah, whatever, right after I'm done with wrestling this snake" when it's time to make an appearance somewhere.
Thunberg doesn't have one original thought in her head and for damn sure you will never see her in any debate setting because she'd be exposed for the fraud we all know she is - filth like her are always shown as frauds.
As for the book, it's probably nothing more than a colouring-in book for children because you certainly won't read anything of merit.
100 contributors with the retard's name on the cover. Sounds legit.
We talking about this book or the White House?
kek
God, she needs to have a Somali rape babyโฆ๐
๐ฑ๐พ๐ณ๐ฟโโ๏ธ๐๐ช๐ง๐ผ๐ธ๐ชโ๏ธ
They would fuck 100 goats before touching Greta. Well, except to chop her head off.
I'd pay real money for a vid of that!
The old saying is that goats are for pleasure, women are for children.
Your terms are acceptable.
LOL the one Somali that would fuck her downvoted you
It would turn out better than she did. Fetal Alcohol Syndrome is not hereditary!
The inbreeding from their side will nosedive her genes.
Pretty sure both sides are inbred
But the science says Africa is the most genetically diverse place in the world. That's why they are black, because occasional mutations like white skin or blue eyes cannot survive to the next generations without some inbreeding.
I applaud your emoji effort. Top notch! ๐ฅ ๐
The book is ghost-written by her aborted children...
K E K !
LOLOLOLOLOL
Maybe it is the 51 former intelligence officials who lied to everyone about the Biden computer times two.
Then minus two.
Why didnโt you minus one then times two? You racist or sumthing?
"I gathered the knowledge."
Right.. because you have none of your own. So, why should I trust you as an editor of this "knowledge?"
"To solve climate change, we must kill all men."
I'm kinda hoping she's right and the world gets ruined. Then we'll go back to only the strong surviving. It will end liberalism forever.
It's not the strong that will survive. It's those without ethics or morals. Those who play by the rules lose to those who don't. There are brief periods in our history where the strongest with morals happened to be way stronger than those without, but then as we see we just revert back to the norm.
Ah, yes... To be human
Morals and Ethics are strength, which is why the people who held to them were able to out compete those who did not and why they're now the norm. Anyone who declares otherwise is a dumbass who can't see anything past their over inflated opinions of themselves.
Not really, not in the situation this string of comments is describing.
Sure, in a civilized and polite society morals and ethics are strength. But we're talking about a societal collapse scenario where there are mass die offs, strife, war, starvation etc.,
In that situation the only thing that matters is if you're willing to do what you need to do in order to survive, that's the only real strength there is.
Because everyone will turn against each other, there will no longer be communities or large groups. You might have some small groups of a dozen or so people at most who work together, but even that will be suspect. Most people won't be able to trust outside of their immediate family.
An example would be, imagine you and your family are starving because everything has gone to shit. You're looking for food daily. You come across a crashed vehicle with corpses inside, but it looksl ike they were running away from something with their supplies.
You find cans of food in the back.
You can feed your family.
Then, here comes a dude out of the bushes with an AK47, he wants your food.
You can show him all the morals and ethics you want, offering to share with him, being a "good citizen", but he has a family to feed too. And he's willing to do whatever is necessary to survive and keep them alive.
So he clapps your cheeks and leaves you bleeding on the road, and takes the food for himself.
A lot of good your ethics and morals did.
you're describing a walking dead scenario. that's not how even a plurality of history has played out. even in mass natural disasters.
sure there would be many faggot opportunists. those would be sorted out fairly quickly as they cant trust or be trusted.
if things got so desperate, then sure, maybe it would be hell, everyone against everyone, for a little while, in some places. (populations of 100k+ cities)
most places in the US would be factions of churches working together for food security and sanity.
eventually, other factions of God fearing men will band together and rebuild.
morals are given to man from God to separate us from the animals. not saying there wont be some HARD and brutal calls to defense and security. but such is war.
I mean, keep telling yourself that and keep clutching your pearls and beating your bible, it's no skin off my back. I'm certain it will all work out for you.
it will. always has for us. sacrifice and love for the sanctity of life outlasts the nihilists like you who normally take themselves out when things get too tough.
Doing just fine in life, and will do just fine if things go to shit, but okay boomer.
But actual evidence shows people in such events tend to form larger groups and some form of local governments and police forces.
I guess that's why they kept tossing people into gulags during the soviet union, and why neighbors turned on neighbors and even family turned on family out of fucking paranoia.
You certainly know what you're talking about, please, let me bow down to your superior knowledge, and please take the podium, for I have been humbled by your greatness.
There was no societal collapse around 1937 when people were tossed into gulags en mass, it was big organized government doing it against individuals and small groups.
I guess you've got a pretty fucked up sense of what constitutes a societal collapse then.
Personally, I think when people start resorting to cannibalism so they don't starve and freeze to death, thats every bit of a societal collapse in all meaningful measures.
Plenty of former USSR Ukrainians would agree, if they weren't in mass graves.
But since you know better, there's no point in even discussing that.
Farming communities makes more sense than Hollywood imagination fueled zombie apocalypse everyone shoots everyone scenario.
He may succeed once or twice, but eventually some larger group of dudes with AK-s will find him. And this group will only take 30-50% of your food for 'protection'.
I mean, the Spartans left their weak newborns out to die. Ethics is a very subjective opinion.
And look at who doesn't exist anymore.
Are you being facetious, or are you actually that stupid?
There are a lot of fucking stupid people on this site now. I swear half of them spend their time bible thumping and screaming about shit they have no understanding of whatsoever, but suffer from such dunning-kruger they actually believe they're winning arguments.
It has really started to be a turnoff here. This place used to be pretty intelligent, but has suffered immense brain drain.
damn you are literally dunning-krugering yourself. name checks out ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
he's right. our country legally shreds their unborn in the womb to the tune of 1 million a year. most likely, our country wont exist because of that.
Our God gave us guidance on how he wants us to live on this earth. Truth and ethics are objective and there is one standard for them.
Follow along, Einstein. Itโs not difficult to possess basic reading comprehension.
Guy1 is making the case that itโs not strength that matters- unethical people will thrive because theyโre willing to do unethical things.
Guy2 is making the rebuttal that ethics ARE strength.
My extremely sound argument points out that a historically strong AND ethical people, the Spartans, survived against far more barbarous and unethical enemies precisely because they were ruthlessly willing to keep their people strong even if it meant doing so called unethical things in the name of a greater good.
As to your painfully stupid response- if a boat is sinking and the only way to save it is to throw the weak and sick overboard - would you prefer instead that everyone drown? Is that โethicalโ to you? Youโre an absolute fucking moron.
BREAKING NEWS Catturd arrested in Romania for cat trafficking
โRan notorious cat houseโ
Female Feline who was interviewed said he petted her pussy.
Kek
In German her last name translates to "tuna mountain" (Thun) Tuna (berg) mountain.
She's going to be fat later in life.
Guaranteed.
Hahaha! ๐ AI can't even make up a STUPIDER name than that
Let's use Turd Mountain instead
That'd be Scheisseberg...
Wait a minute...
I've heard she actually has a tattoo of a tuna on her inner thigh, and if you scratch and sniff it... well
๐คฎ
All joking aside, its only got to be a matter of time before Greta discovers close encounters with One Eye. I'm betting her handlers are working hard to delay that event.
Only a matter of time before she's dragging the monster cyclops to tuna cavern! Then it's "yeah, whatever, right after I'm done with wrestling this snake" when it's time to make an appearance somewhere.
I'll wager that when she does find someone that she wants to try and fuck her brains out, it'll be an individual thats more Chad than Green simpy. :)
Let's hope Chad fucks her so hard her brain rattles. If she gets with a simp first she's likely to go lez and be lost forever.
"I have gathered the wisdom"
COPY + PASTE
PRINT
Potatoes ๐ฅ can read and write? Fascinating times my fren
Is this for sale in East Palestine, Ohio?
Shhhhh...we don't talk about that.
With insights from some visionaries as:
Tommy Wrinkleshaft, who glued himself to the factory floor of a BMW and is sexually attracted to trees
Lisa Franzia, noted climate change blogger who shares her one bedroom apartment with 16 cats
John Kerry, the guy married to the ketchup lady
Earthday founder that murdered & composted his girlfriend.
We should set him up on a date with Greta
Link - https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1625618419218259988
She's getting ratioed. LOL. Good to see. I despise her face.
She's still getting rich.
Yeah. Seems all evil people do.
Yes. But from cucked libs, not conservative dollars.
Lack of philtrum means she doesn't cross the uncanny valley
Looks big enough to serve as a stylish doorstop. Where do I order one???
Releasing your book digitally like on Kindle, or even on audio, would generate zero carbon footprint.
But reducing her carbon footprint is never something Greta has cared about.
Not actually cuz servers and such.
Her carbon footprint is necessary to elim8nate your carbon footprint. Itโs for the greater good.
Money Laundering 101 - 'Write' a book.
How much did we end up paying for this garbage through Obama's slush fund publisher?
If a retard "gatherers wisdom" is it truly wisdom?
Asking for a Fren
Well more profound than the sound of one hand fapping...
Looks like we got another BOOK DEAL!!!
Remember, a book deal is how you get paid off when you've done a good job.
There's not a singular chance the puppet wrote that. Any time that bitch goes off the cuff or unscripted, she has nothing to say.
OK, that thing looks Evil. There is something wrong with that thing. Am I alone in seeing this?
It is the massive Fetal Alcohol syndrome in her face....
She is a spiteful mutant
Or the permanent โbitter beer faceโ
Is it written in crayon and have pictures? How about writing a book about the Ohio train crash and how the Biden Administration is ignoring it.
Even sadder, those trees and fossil fuels were wasted cuz nobody will read or use those books, except to burn for heat cuz grid down no wind or solar.
This is the pay off. Always with book deals for the pay off.
You have the brain of a mosquitoe, and bug people.
But how big are bug people brains?
Goddamnit, I'd like to kick her in her fat goddamn face.
Money laundering
In the dollar bin next week.
Just in time for the collapsed society book burning.
She kinda looks like the girl Shrek. Or maybe the daughter of the Shreks
HOW DARE SHE?!
I want to slap that stupid bitch.
She's the smug cunt in History class that's the teachers pet. I guarantee she's absolutely cringe and annoying as fuck.
So she admits to just regurgitating recycled shit.
How much harmful chemical was needed to depulpify those cut down trees to turn into pages
Thunberg doesn't have one original thought in her head and for damn sure you will never see her in any debate setting because she'd be exposed for the fraud we all know she is - filth like her are always shown as frauds.
As for the book, it's probably nothing more than a colouring-in book for children because you certainly won't read anything of merit.
So she had nothing to do with it and they're just using her face to sell it
Which is exactly what her role has always been
WOW! MORE WORDS NOT FROM HER OWN MIND AND MOUTH!
QUELLE SURPRISE!
And here is the pay off. The infamous book (laundering money) deal....
Why didn't she just release an e-book? Maybe because book publishing is a way to collect a payoff.