860 Dawkins Vows to Continue Using ‘Prohibited Words’ Like ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ (www.breitbart.com) YES posted 99 days ago by MythArcana 99 days ago by MythArcana +860 / -0 Dawkins Vows to Keep Using 'Prohibited Words' Like 'Male' and 'Female' Richard Dawkins has spoken out against woke efforts to scrap "binary" terms like "female" in favour of "inclusive" terms like "egg producing" www.breitbart.com 76 comments share 76 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Well, his background is in biology, so I would hope so.
Doesn’t stop him from talking profusely about areas outside his discipline though 😂. But good for him for sticking to his guns.
Indeed, I guess he knows that he better not lose all credibility in all fields.
Big time atheist, correct. Surprising. Maybe he will find Jesus.
People who are serious about trying to disprove God, always end up finding God.
People who pretend to believe no God exists, always fear the realities that will come if they're wrong.
Take a note every time you hear someone you know claims to not be religious say something like "prayers for X" - it's shocking the regularity they will say something that confers their belief in God, and Hell, despite claiming none of it is real.
Heisenberg, Hoyle, and Einstein.
"The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you" - Walter Heisenberg
"God Does Not Play Dice" - Einstein
"There are very many aspects of the universe where you either have to say there have been monstrous coincidences, which there might have been, or alternatively, there is a purposive scenario to which the universe conforms." - Hoyle
Einstein believed in "spenoza's god" not your god. He made that very clear.
Yes, a Deist along the lines of what Jefferson believed: The Great Architect.
You know Einstein was a Jew right?
Do you fear the wrath of Zeus? No.
Atheists literally feel about God the way you feel about Zeus.
So, would you be willing to denounce God publicly, here and now?
Just going by your comment, I'm assuming you don't believe, so it wouldn't mean anything to you to just say it.
I do not believe in your God or any other god.
That doesn't seem to be the case, as many modern atheists seem to be far more autistic about the Bible than any believer are only "athesits" as some form of social protest.
Most people "feel that way about Zeus" because, you know, they're not Greek. Why would a non-Greek feel any sort of particular way about non-proselytzing belief that was almost entirely limited to portions of the populations inhabiting the Mediterranean coast?
Fine, insert "Prophet Muhammad" instead of Zeus. My point stands.
The default is atheism. Belief is taught. Belief, for rational people, requires evidence.
"The fool is right, every now and then, by chance." (William Cowper)
Dawkins is a complete faggot but I applaud this
Complete faggot but not full retard
He is. Just not in this one instance
Even a broken retarded faggot is right twice a day
More eloquent words have never been spoken.
it was all fun and games until the flying spaghetti monster turned out to be real and now we're living inside a Hieronymus Bosch painting
LoL! Probably the best comment I've read all week.
Along with his peers, Dawkins is a progenitor of all of this woke bullshit. Atheism became Atheism plus, and so on until you get to the likes of Lia Thomas.
He helped create the monster that ate it's master.
No, the monster of Materialism is a lot older than Dawkins. He just rode it at its peak.
“The revolution devours its children.”
Cyclically recurring historical pattern of civilizational collapse.
Dr Peterson called it “the goddess of chaos” or “the dragon of chaos”.
He was against Atheism plus. Western Atheism was largely libertarian before atheism plus swooped in with social justice cancer, really pushing the "atheism because religious morality is super inconvenient" rather than "atheism because of reasoning."
he practically invented militant atheism. the woke crowd are the recipients and practitioners of his anti-gospel.
That "honor" would go to Marx and Satan.
Dawkins is just another patsy who was taken seriously due to his credentials in a field completely unrelated to religion.
The mentally ill cannot process such complex numbers such as two.
The brainpower required to count to two! SIMPLY IMPOSSIBLE!
In Spanish they’re called Hombre and Mujer. In Chinese it’s 男人 and 女人. I personally don’t care what they’re called as long as there’s two distinct sexes.
The dude sawed off the branch he's sitting on.
I too will continue to use prohibited words:
Male & female
Mother & father
Faggot & retard
Looks like I'm late to the party!
Still an atheist and therefore cringe.
But even agents of satan refusing to use gender confused bullshit language, that's a good sign.
Na he's served his purpose and it's time for him to go home. From Satan's point of view. I hope he repents because it would be glorious, but it'd be a miracle.
Still worshipping an incest forcing god, so cringe.
Ahhh, my atheist pal! You disappeared rather than telling me why it is that 4 out of 5 US atheists are leftists and whether you have Jagmeet Singh or Justin Trudeau on your wall!
Your assumptions on my being atheist are wrong. That doesn't make my statement false or me an atheist because I don't believe in your incest god.
Whatever your world view is, it's obviously not worthy of you standing up for it.
Because it's not your religion, right?
Because you won't or can't even describe what your worldview is. It can't be very good.
Ah yes, the fundamentalist literal interpretation of genesis straw man.
So deep, so edgy, so smart. WAY smarter than us idiot Christians.
You figured out that it's an allegory. You deserve a medal for being the smartest person on planet Earth. 🏆
It's the true word of God or it's not. Even Christians can't agree on the interpretation of it.
The % of Christians and Jews who believe in a literal interpretation of Genesis is rock bottom.
I know several Rabbis and Catholic Priests, not one of them preaches that Genesis is a historical record, SMH. Not one person I have EVER met, in a lifetime of religious study, believes Genesis is a literal historical account. ONLY on the internet and backwards ass Bible Belt mega-churches do you find that crap, and the people on stage milking saps for money don't even believe it themselves.
Don't use take-downs of the most retarded elements of society to form arguments, it is lazy and you know it.
I do. I'm a former scientist turned programmer. My church is smallish, has an extremely low cost structure and open financial books.
The correct biblical hermeneutic is to treat each book according to its purported genre. Genesis purports to be and even asserts it's a history, including in Genesis 2, and even more so from the context of chapter 5, which would be utterly nonsensical as an allegory.
My understanding of chapter 5 takes into account when it was written and who it was written for. To me it is serving to provide the Jews with a common narrative and origin story as a people, all the way back to creation. It is pragmatically included, succinctly, for that purpose.
Even Jewish rabbis I speak to that read the Torah every year with their congregation do not regard the writings of moses, including the exodus from Egypt, as the actual history of their people.
PS I'm a software engineer myself :-) whatup! Nice to meet based coders in a sea of soyboy tech bros.
That's not an allegory then, that's a false or completely mythical history. What's your stance on the authority of scripture?
I presume your Jewish rabbis are Reform?
PS You should try meeting some intelligent evangelicals. There's plenty of us around; there are more evangelicals than any other sort of observant Christian or Jew, and we are represented in all the professions. We actually read our Bibles far more than even Orthodox Jews (who mostly read rabbinic writings), let alone Reform Jews.
You say the same thing about the Quran?
What same thing
he doesn't want to eat the fruits of his labor
I wouldn't expect anything else from Dawkins.
absolutely, let's continue using 'libtards' also
"YEAH, HE"S SOOOOO SMART!!!" He's also going to dent the existence of God... "BOOOOO! HE'S SOOOOOO DUMB!"
The useful idiot thought he was in the central committee.
When the system begins to suppress scientific fact because of feelings, you know that everything is doomed. If shit doesn't get turned around ASAP, it's going to be hell on earth.
He was good in South Park
Sacrilege!! Sacrifice him at the altar of the demonic transGod
So, take him to Hillary's house then.