You can cry muh socialism all you want but that makes you look like an anti white retard. Every western country of today is more socialist than NSDAP's Germany ever was.

found another one. Socialism is not some monolithic thing that is the same everywhere its implemented. What has been done in places like Canada is different than what is done in England and Australia for example. The Nazis were no different. They rejected the marx and bolshevik versions for their own unique version but the core tenants are undeniably socialist in practice and in writings. All you have to do to see this is read some of the writings of hitler and other members of the nazi party, their actions with land and business owners and even read contemporaries who studied Nazi Germany at the time. The truth is all out there if you wish to cure your ignorance. This bullshit that the nazis were not socialist nor left is just flat out historical revisionism. If you have any knowledge of the western left its clear why they would want to do this.

A private business in Nazi Germany was “private” in name only. The moment the owner stepped out of line, his company was seized and either unofficially nationalized or handed over to a more reliable party member, which was essentially the same thing. Look at Hugo Eckener of Zeppelin, who got the “non-person” treatment from the goosesteppers, or Hugo Junkers, who was killed in his home by the gestapo (allegedly he “died of natural causes” right in front of them) after the company he built was snatched out from under him because he didn’t want to play ball. Both of these were before the war started, so no “wartime needs” excuse. Other German businessmen saw this and took a hint (the fact that Hitler repeatedly professed his hatred of capitalists didn’t go unnoticed, either). Like all forms of socialism, your rights disappeared the moment you stepped out of line.

They did pull the party out and then by 1937, were going right back into it.

We are conflating the original Socialist party which started to die out before Hitler, which the Fascism of Hitler thar took it over when ever he assumed power.

The original party was inspired by Boshlevism. I'm sorry. It just started losing over time and by the time Hitler rose, it was a pretty weak party and voter bloc. That's because Hyper inflation was essentially fixing itself by that point and the more well informed knew this.

The original Hyper inflation was actually on purpose and initiated by the Weimar to destroy their currency value on the exchange market. This was to rob the value of the exchange so that it soiled the Reparations Payments so ordered bybthe Treaty of Versailles. They needed to do this because the Treaty restricted so much of the export trade function of Germany that the payments were beyond the total GDP value that their economy could support. It would have permanently bankrupted the nation and thus the vultures in London and Paris would have basically 'bought' Germany for pennies on the dollar, the German sovereignty would've been destroyed.

During the Hyper inflation, the original party was still promoting socialist agenda but failing as the circumstances for Hyper inflation made their approach pointless. The era was not conducive to hearing such boshlevism whenever they reason for their plight wasn't corporate greed or elitism locally, it was international vendetta after a brutal war.

It was pushed by the Frankfurt school which is where all the Communists of major renown came from. If you read any Commie books like I have, a lot of the turn if the century writers will eventually make their way to Frankfurt.

When Hitler arose, it was purely on the backs of Germans who had suffered the economic sacrifice and were simply impatient (honestly who can blame them) to see life return to something besides depression. However by 1930, the the Treaty's requirements were nearly all reversed. The payments were ordered stopped years prior as it was succeeding in pulling the French 'Frank's down with the Duetchmark and was collapsing Frances economy as well. To regain some of their monetary value, France sold back the Reinland which was the area of South Germany that contained most of the industrial base at that time.

Stupid decision on the French in hindsight, but since most of that land was populated by Germans, its not like they'd get it to work anyway. However with the re-addition of the Reinland, jobs started slowly coming back as inflation eased.

When Hitler arose in 1933, he was already beginning to lose popularity. The Weimar, a council of old men whom undoubtedly were tired of accusations and yelling from the masses who just suffered through the inflation in order to throw off the yoke of British and French control - capitulated to Hitler's demands after Hitler and his brown shirts had their fill going full Leftist. Lighting shit on fire and assaulting people. They hoped to quell him by playing appeasement and thus GAVE him the chancellorship role. To deal with the unrest and the fact that the global wave of depression started again, they gave him 'emergency power' to significantly sway the population that there was some one else to blame but them.

And they never needed to do this. 1932 was the highest voter support Hitler would ever see. He had actually peaked in that year and the NAZI party was again on the verge of decline by the time the Weimar reacted. Had they just enforced the law and kept the fucking faggot in jail, and kept going forward, the Nazi's would've continued to lose out and WW2 would've never have happened, nor another German depression, nor anything else that the idiot brought upon the people.

But instead, they handed it to him on a silver platter. Upon the death of Hindenburg, Hitler would never relinquish his Emergency powers that were intended for only 6 months.

With such powers and the move to be announced 'Furher', Hitler installed a state command economy much like Stalin or Mao at the time. Using the foundations of Fascism as outlined by Giovanni Gentile's book with Benito in Italy, Hitler installed a system that was little different that what Communism of the day proposed. There's little difference between Fascism and Communism at this time. Back then, Communism was still based on the Material Dialectic proposed by Marx, and so focused much on the material and economic circumstances of power. Fascism was very similar, arising from very similar thought. The difference was the views on cultural identity in which Giovanni argued that establishing such an identity was based in religion, and that a nation must install a homogeneous religion and embrace it. For Italy, this meant Christianity and for Hitler? Oh I don't know... read Mein Kampf 1 and 2 and tell me... I'm pretty sure it's the same...

This was the only real fundamental difference.

By 1936 however a new form of Communism was rising which involved Cultural Marxism, which is a Marxism inspired dipctrine based on Cultural Hegemony, a book written by Antonio Gramsci. This book married well with Lenin's concepts of what would become Cultural Marxism, a synthesis of Gnostic and Hermetic belief systems that resulted in a gnostic motivator and a hermetic Praxis.

Hitler was privy to this and while it was similar to his own fucked up belief system, the fact of the matter is that it was a rivalry. Or... 'my Fascism is better than your Fascism'. But of course, you cannot call the Commies, Fascists, because if you did, the jig was up when people would realize that you're effectively the same thing so... yeah...

Hitler ended up crashing the economy within a couple of years. He fired 3 different economic advisors because they were literally telling him to stop spending money they don't have. The mother fucker was going full Joe Biden about just using a Nazi form of 'Build Back Better'. These proclamations built things like the Autobahn and new Aerodromes, new factories INCLUDING VOLKSWAGEN, and the constant money printing to pay for this was causing inflation to return (big wow, much surprise...).

By 1939, Hitler had convinced his Generals that they needed to invade Poland despite their explanations that if they started war too soon, they'd be destined to lose because they don't have enough stock piles fuel, oil, weapon systems, ect. However by the 3rd advisor, Hitler finally realized he fucked over the last 5 years and was trying to correct it with 'Lebensraum', which is similar to what Putin is doing to Ukrain. 'We are going to annex these border lands because the people are actually German/Russian ethnically and they want it!'

Yeah...

However to give Putin credit, he's not looking to enslave the people like Hitler did. Hitler was literally looking to slavery by this point and his version of Crimea, Austria, was an example of that. Austrians willingly sided with Germany and in his ever so greatful open arms, Hitler enslaved them. Needed them for cheap labor because it was the only way to try and stop the inflation but still keep building the war machine HE COULDNT AFFORD. Because just like Russia, he had sanctions at this time. He had no China to do business through on exports like Russia does today, so slavery was the best bet.

And a lot like the Communists, indoctrination of children was already recognized as the best way to install a new Culture so guess what, Austrian schools converted to Hitler youth centers had pictures of Hitler that they prayed to everyday. Women would required to get pregnant to ensure future population growth in that same system and the men were put to work in slave conditions in mines and other hard labor.

The government provided everything for them BUT YOU FAIL TO SEE HOW HITLERS FASCISM IS NOT THE SAME AS MAO'S OR STALINS COMMUNIST REGIMES, THEN YOURE A FUCKING RETARD.

The invasion of Poland began as economic pressure still mounted. At that point, Hitler figured the best way forward was to take new labor and land by force, and be in a position to siege towards modern day Georgia where more Oil would be secured, fueling the war reserves.

Hitler was fucking dumbass.

The nazis were a unique form of socialist, rejecting Marx's and Russias vision of it, but still socialist. You can deny that all you want but like many here you would be flat out wrong if you do.

Yes they allowed property owners (many socialist countries do) and they allowed business owners to own businesses but they were not free to do what they wanted with that property or business. The state was king, the nazis controlled the state, and they dictated what you could do based on what was best for said state, even in business. The needs of the many outweighed the individual in Nazi Germany. This is just one example. If you want more there is tons of reading you can do from hitler and other leadership in the nazi party that reinforces the socialist angle even more.

EDIT: we got a taker on the "nazis were not socialist" bit

Only progressives say this. They try and distance themselves from their extensive similarities in policies, their collaboration before and protection of Nazis during the war. Not to mention protecting them after the war.

Only leftists and progressives say what you're saying.

As any sane country would.

If you arm the enemy too you're gonna end up with a unsafe shithole where everyone is forced to be armed at all time for their own protection, where kids can never go out alone, shootouts happen all the time and nobody trusts anyone.

I know this would be seems as very controversial by American standard, but for Germany it worked great.