UPDATE: Biden Regime Confirms Commitment To “Legally-Binding” Agreement Which Will Surrender U.S. Pandemic Authority To Chinese-Backed World Health Organization “For Generations To Come”
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
LET'S GO BRANDONski
Comments (246)
sorted by:
Of course they did. They proposed it.
We're back to Marbury v. Madison.
Marbury v. Madison was a constitutional coup.
How....?
It's simple.
Marbury v. Madison, essentially an employment contract case were Marbury was asking the court the compel the secretary of state to deliver his letters of appointment, the court decided that SCOTUS had the unilateral power to declare laws unconstitutional.
Before Marbury v. Madison, no branch of government could unilaterally overrule the other two. After Marbury v. Madison, SCOTUS could unilaterally overrule the other two. And let's not ignore the fact that the president that Marshall was doing this to was the person that actually wrote the damn thing.
Effectively, the Judicial Branch gave itself legislative powers that were supposed to be reserved for the Legislative Branch.
It was indeed a coup.
Judicial Review was proposed at the Philly Convention and resoundingly rejected.
There are those who argue that it's a good idea, which is fine, but it needed to go through the Amendment process (like so much else). You don't get to just summon powers out of thin air, but they did.
What's missed by most is that the proper entity to judge Constitutionality is the States (through nullification, the budget process, Senate appointments/repeal) and The People (through the House electoral process.).
These were the real checks and balances and they were stolen out from under us.
Bingo. No one learns anymore that the country was founded on the Federal Government deriving it's powers from the states, not the other way around. People were the miltia and the national guards the armies. Presidents were elected by the states, not the atrocious "one person one vote" bullshit, also created out of thin air by SCOTUS. If something was unconstitutional, it was the states that were to give the federal government the middle finger, and it was the state legislature that would fire their senators a week after appointing them and send someone better.
That's exactly how we teach the Constitution on several shows/week.
I can't spam the links here, but if you find me on Twitter, I post the showtimes.
Same twitter name?
There's a bunch of War Hamster on Twitter, which is you?
Hey man, if you need a voice actor or narrator, I do that stuff. DM me and we can discuss. I'm semi-pro.
Edit: Sorry for the double post. I must have tapped it twice on my phone.
Can you imagine if our senators were still appointed by the state legislatures? 🤔
Repealing the 17th amendment, going back to the nomination of senators by the governor and confirmation by state legislature, would go a long way to restoring some balance. The 17th amendment completely severs the elected state government connection to the Federal.. and that's why they are treated more and more as if they are territories of a federal empire instead of one of 50 sovereign states.
I think of it like this, the 17th amendment makes popularly elected senators and cuts out the elected state government. Now imagine if the UN decided that ambassadors would be popularly elected and the President, Senate, or anyone else could say boo about a Fetterman being elected. And then, they vote on stuff that becomes legally binding on the US without any consult with the president or anyone.
The fed ownes the state with their printed out of thin air banker money
Didn't Biden try to sneak this in earlier last year but someone caught him and he had to pull back? I think it was in some stimulus bill that nobody reads and they will try it again over and over and eventually they will get in done during the remaining two years during the Puppet Administration.
The UniParty desperately want to give up their powers to an international body like the WHO and then throw up their hands like they did during the Plannedemic -- "It is not us that are forcing you to take the clot shot or lose your job it is the federal government and the CDC doing it. We have no power over the federal government.
But congress approved it in the defense authorization act. Seems like this could be viewed as a constitutional amendment but no one is suing saying it’s unconstitutional.
Yet.
Republicans are slow filling outside of judicial watch. Do we wait till we have WHO marching down the streets augmented with Antifa/BLM soldiers? Than the courts will say we don’t have standing?
Throw in the UN too. Sounds like trash day.
It's more complicated than that. In that case the anti-Adams people managed to block 18 judges appointed by Adams. That was in itself either a coup or a counter-coup, and the court picked a side. Basically, we doo have a way for Congress to challenge Supreme Court decisions it doesn't like, and that is to strip judges and courts of jurisdiction till they say 'uncle'.
It's not that Marbury was a coup. It's that ever since we've had the court mostly using that power to do things that wouldn't upset Congress too much (or that Congress secretly wants), so Congress never does anything about it, so it's now the norm for the court to rule whatever the fuck it likes. But it didn't have to be that way.
Why aren't Supreme Court judges elected like any other? They're elected at the state level.
One of the checks is that the federal judicial branch, with a lifetime appointment, should be able to be unbiased in their rulings. Meaning, the founders did not want them to be pressured to rule based on the whims of the electorate. That was left to the legislative branch who was supposed to debate how modern problems should be solved. The legislative branch was supposed to be fiery, power hungry, and ambitious. It was supposed to be the most powerful branch.
Back to judicial branch, the founders thought having an older generation of gentlemen judges would ensure changes would be incremental. That was supposed to stabilized the country. Also, remember the federal government was supposed to be small and only have the enumerated powers.
Plus, the founders never envisioned both the states and the legislative branches would give up so much of their powers to the executive branch.
States decide for themselves whether their supreme court judges are elected, appointed for life, or appointed for a term. Not all states have used election of their judges throught the state's history. Just like not all states have a bicameral legislative branch and not all states have a legislative branch that meet year-round.
Thanks for the explanation. It makes sense that the judges shouldn't be ruling for votes.
But sometimes it feels like they are.
Judicial review.
The UniParty desperately want to give up their powers to an international body like the WHO and then throw up their hands like they did during the Plannedemic -- "It is not us that are forcing you to take the clot shot or lose your job it is the federal government and the CDC doing it. We have no power over the federal government.
The uniparty wants us to feel that way. It will make it easier for the NWO to take over power if we feel our government doesn't have our backs. They want to become our saviors from our current corruption.
He needs approval of the senate and house for any treaty to be bidding.
Thats why this isnt a traditional treaty.
They wrote this specifically to skirt the need for approval.
Just a signature by the pedophile in chief and boom done.
Which makes it completely unenforceable and void.
Ya it is unenforceable if nobody enforces it.
You can bet your ass that our NAZI DOJ, FBI, and police departments will be enforcing it.
And do you really think the RINOs will do fuck all about it?
They are all on China's/cartels/mafias payroll.
We are just a defacto Narco state run by big pharma and the cartels.
Try to keep your business open during the next pandemic when the WHO demands it to be closed. You will be arrested by the stasi.
At the end of the day, it's always just what people do.
The constitution is only a piece of paper. It can only offer anything if the people understand the underpinnings of why it was written as it was and we've allowed the schools to undermine that for decades.
TIL: they are not one and the same
some of us are just going to have a heavy load. the others, fearful and confused, will be standing at the fence wondering what's going on, more than willing to capitulate to winner.
I'm sure they'll make an exception for any marxist group wanting to gather and protest while harassing Christians going to church. Just like last time.
They act this way because it doesnt cross their minds anymore that the people can be dangerous. A few don't get to go home to their families and that changes fast...
Conservatives are cowards though, covid proved that!
Next time it should be extremely hazardous for the enforcers.
Masks, lockdowns, and vaccine passports were unconstitutional and unenforceable. they still did it
The constitution doesn’t mean anything if it isn’t followed or enforced, which is clear that it isn’t anymore(if it ever was)
Trump could have reacted to the Paris Climate Accord by saying "it's not a treaty, so it's void". Instead he politely gave the formal announcement that the US would be withdrawing, per the terms of the "treaty", over a period of years. I want to see him clean house this time.
It’s not stopped them before.
They can offer services, but they can't force you to be a customer.
Nah...he can't enact laws....
He doesn't need to, he just needs willing enforces who will trample citizens rights for a pension. That wasn't an issue when it was Americans, now that their enforcement arms are being staffed with foreigners it will be even less of an issue.
Good luck with that...
Lol you must have missed 2020 happening.
Or the rounding up of Jan 6 prisoners or the arrest of pro life activists but the goons at the FBI
Biden gave away your pension to Ukraine.
that's bullshit. there's no such thing.
A treaty by any other name...
Just like the Paris climate accords
Not just that. The treaty needs to be approved by congress, but its provisions must also be enacted through authorizing legislation. And, not that the Constitution means much to the faggots in Washington, treaty provisions still can't supersede the Constitution.
Jay Inslee in WA still retains emergency powers, it's illegal, yet continues.
The problem in WA is they have a super majority and no judge will go after coof powers. These people are stupid and believe they will die if magical masks are not enforced and the wonderful jab isn’t given to every man, woman and dog.
Very true
Some of those words are from my friend's lawyer. Of course the state forced all medical practitioners to get the jab and they were denying her exemption request due to an adverse reaction to the first jab. The problem is the lawyers here are lefties too and don't want to go after any of them. Even the Doctors who documented her reaction wouldn't as much write a note for exemption filing. The state will go after their medical license if they speak up. It is absolute madness.
IL and Pritzker have entered the chat.
The treaty us already approved and in force. Thus js supposedly an ‘amendment’
That's all well and good, but an amendment to a treaty doesn't create authorizing legislation. There are treaties in effect in this country where Congress only created authorizing legislation for Clauses A and B, not C and D, and the same is true for any amendment to a treaty that just because it's in the treaty America is a signatory of doesn't make it law in America.
That means jack shot. The concept of ‘law’ is meaningless when you are dealing with criminals. People need to wake up.
This was just one comment ago.
You can't be awake without understanding how the law is supposed to work in the first place. If you want to just go in with "that means jack shot" then you aren't awake; you're just throwing a tantrum.
None of anything that happened in the last three years was ‘legal’ in any sense. Tell me when someone is held accountable
People who are saying that these treaties aren’t ‘legal’ are missing the fucking point. The fact that they aren’t ‘legal’ is what makes them dangerous. ‘legality’ is not the mechanism they are going to exert their power
Laws aren't there for you. They're there for the powerful.
All power comes from the threat of violence. Laws are window dressing, the facade of civility.
Democrats have been skirting this requirement for years. There was no advice and consent on the Iran nuclear deal or Paris global warming agreement. And that’s because they knew Congress wouldn’t ratify it
Not the house, just the Senate, but yes you are correct.
Well then it the court option since the legislature and executive can't forfeit their own powers
Do they just bypass the constitution by calling it “accords” instead of a “treaty”, just so Congress doesn’t have to vote on it?
pretty much.
Basically, yes.
Still not binding. Cannot supersede the constitution
You are the enforcement arm of the Constitution. So it'll be up to you whether it's enforced.
Technically this is a correct statement, but realistically you and I know how this works.
You can say legally-binding, but that doesn't make it legally-binding.
But it's just another reason why, if you live in a blue state, you need to get your ass to a red state and make it redder. Commie faggots will have no issue citing the "legally-binding" WHO orders for why they are locking you in a building and setting it on fire.
You can say whatever you want. Bullets don't care.
In the end, he who holds the guns makes the law.
I’m not going to move to another state just to avoid their ‘laws.’ I simply just become ungovernable.
This. I stopped wearing their damn masks long ago. Now I need to wear one to see a doctor. Okay, I just won’t go. Or at least, it will be on my terms. Regular checkups? Screw that. You want me to come in to pad your bottom line? No.
I have a "legally binding" document that shows I own the moon...
So in essence the US just signed away any independence it had
but states didnt
Ah yeah, that is a good model. Ah just imagine all the lockdownies with syringes up your ass woeing at you, lamenting you should follow the proper authorities! Ah, glorious
How many cultists complained about Florida then went on vacation there?
Yes. If this BS gains any kind of traction and momentum, expect the red states to pass laws saying the WHO along with federal, state and local government entities will have no power to enforce its edicts.
Trying to get revenge on the Red States that stayed open.
We can do the same still no matter what the who says.
What would the WHO do if we defied them? That’s right, they’re toothless. The UN blue helmets would be cannon fodder if they dared to set foot on US soil
Just put out a couple Vulnerable Child decoys and they would come running from miles around
there’s no such thing as a magical ‘constitution’ if none of the precepts are followed or enforced.
We should apply the same principle towards so-called agreements used to force us to take in so-called asylum seekers and refugees. Controlling who can and cannot enter the US is our sovereign right.
Will be wild.
Should’ve been wilder
There is nothing legally binding about it whatsoever. International law is not real.
Doesn’t matter. Extra sovereign powers are still powers, and they don’t have to be ‘legal’. Because there is no law, (it’s not ‘real’) they do whatever the fuck they want.
Possession is 3/4ths of the ‘law’
The globalist doesn’t have to actually have ’sovereignty’ because they control the sovereigns through other means. That’s what people need to wake the fuck up to.
Your ‘elected’ leaders are agents of another power. Your magical document isn’t going to save you
Yet another regime to ignore. No street-shitter is going to tell me what to do.
I am going to be so ecstatic to see Trump undo all the BS that this corrupt Biden regime has done. It will be glorious.
Dominion machines go BRRRRRRRR
Yea like fraud needs to be fixed first. Michigan is gone they stole that and have a Democrat house, senate and gov so good luck fixing the fraud there
just like he drained the swamp last time
two moar weeks
He needs to go scorched earth.
Lol get fucked
This is just minor bullshit.
First we have to take back government from the globalist psychopaths.
Then we rescind all stupid treaties. Russia just ended the START nuclear treaty. We can do the same for any treaties that are not in our interests. Who is going to stop us?
US.....by doing nothing. It's beyond time to be organized and enforcing the constitution ourselves.
NOT ratified by Senate NOT BINDING
yet they will still lock you down, mask you and force inject you
I'm not sure which sounds more fun to me, picking off blue helmet faggots or blue haired faggots.
I keep saying only two ways this all goes. Total submission or war.
traitor in the white house. He didn't even win the 2020 election.
This is the Democrat / Rino globohomo agenda. Seceding control to world bodies via treaties. The goal is to create a global federal government making it impossible for countries to vote out enough to ever change course. You cant even alter the direction of the federal government. Imagine if the whole country is 5% of the voting block. You'll never have any control or self determination. You'll be a slave forever.
If the senate doesn’t sign, it’s not binding even a little.
Doesn’t matter, they’ll do it anyway.
The treaty has already been ratified. They are just amending it with the new provisions
Sure. Legal never matters. It’s why they make a big deal about saying it’s “binding” so people will think it is. I lived through 2020-2021.
When is it time for ammo box? Ballot failed us.
Three words for when they try to enforce this: pew pew pew.
Gun violence is hereby declared to be a public health crisis. Therefore, the WHO requires all private citizens to turn in their firearms. Thank you for your cooperation.
Give them lead instead...
This is illegal. Therfore I will not comply.
This needs a sticky.
LOL it GOT one-- two hours after I posted about it--with a better thread title, making a point not made here. I think I've finally figured it out (for others because I'm done starting threads 8 people see; I'll stick to commenting): you need to add "UPDATE"...even when it's not. 🤣 That is how you do it!
You are a hero.
LMAO Heroine...but I get your point!
Giving it away piece by piece.
First Obama gave away control of our internet, now this.
No. You ain't the boss of me.
Traitors.
High treason
Please please God let them try and enforce this
They will - a generation from now when the ones being indoctrinated in the school system are in charge.
LOL…..not legally binding anything. All bullshit. If it’s not in our constitution, fuck you.
There will be blood
OK OK Biden we get it, you hate America already.
Maybe this kind of thing will be the spark that sets off the Revolution we didn’t have in 2020. Maybe….
I won't do shit that they say
That is some Day 1 executive repeal shit for Don.
Sorry for blackpill but Trump will not run in 2024. He will be indicted and fast-tracked to trial in BLM DC courts, where he will be found guilty and given the max jail time.
Some crystal balls you have there...
Why is the first thing this statement says is, "We stand with Ukraine"? Why is that statement at the top? It has nothing to do with the pandemic or this agreement.
Biolabs and Metabiota have entered the chat.