They did. Apparently they hit the command centre with US military who were basically planning and leading the operation; given a large delegation of ukro-general staff visited the US embassy immediately after one can only assume mass casualties.
The Kinzhal does mach 10, nothing exists - today - to counter it.
To be honest with you, the whole place disgusts me so much, I've only given the joint scant mental attention. I think the 'Congressman' and 'Senator' titles have always thrown me. Thanks very much for your clarification.
Anyways, they're all a bunch of traitors, under the same roof.
And ALL exempt from any vaccine mandates -and ALL with major shares in Big Pharma and the Military Industrial Complex, including MTG, bless her.
When I was working in the media we were told that, to avoid confusion, it is best to refer to members of the House of Representatives as "Representatives" or "Members of Congress", while reserving the term "Senator" for members of the Senate.
I just call the entire body (the House and Senate) “the legislature.”
IMO it’s weird to lump the Senate in with the House by referring to it all as “Congress,” especially when Representatives carry the “Congressman” title and not Senators.
BINGO!!!! "I will, just wait until after the election", wink wink sucky sucky. We have that capability, we gave it to the Russians via Obamy and the MIC for the $$$$$.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. They shouldn't be fucking around in other countries if they don't want to occasionally be the one hit with a missile instead of just chucking them at third worlders.
Video from 2022 but damn that's fast. Why does anyone think fucking around with Russia they can win? They have the capability to manufacturer weapons faster than us. They are probably the most capable ground force in the world. US always maintains superiority via Air and Sea. Both of which Russia can match or minimum effectively counter. No way anyone is beating them in Ukraine. It's preposterous. I don't think they want to just blow Ukraine off the map due to a large Russian population their, but no one is looking for peace in the West so they are given no choice but to destroy Ukraine as we know it.
Why does anyone think fucking around with Russia they can win?
Boomer post-Cold War PTSD mentality. They spent their formative years being scared to death of the USSR. When it collapsed, boomers drew themselves a mental picture of Russia being a weak joke. A place to laugh at and no longer fear.
This thinking never had a basis in reality, particularly since it conveniently cuts off right after Soviet collapse and ignores over two decades of Putin.
I wonder if we're at the point where if China cuts us off, we would be unable to manufacture military vehicles once our stockpile of certain components runs out.
Maybe that US defector gave the Russians some good intel as to where he might have been too in the country prior to being sent to the front with Nazi Battalions.
Wait even more until all that's left is the overinflated piggy banks of near-dead politicians and their spawn.
I think Putin realized, from Z's latest rant, that they're running out of political capital for money laundering and enough damage has been done. Hopefully him, Trump, and anyone else that's against the globalists are watching where the rats swim after they jump ship. That's the real victory.
They're doing it exactly right so far, cripple infrastructure and force them to drag this out. The Russians could even lose territory for months and return for a part 2 that way. It gives them so many options, it's brilliant. If they were to drop the bomb it would come down to a standoff eventually.
I posted a video almost 11 months ago. Basically, this former CIA analyst who is now dead, laid out their strategy, being exactly that. Saying that the Westerners have such a different view of how war is supposed to be for that they would never see it coming in fall into the trap.
They need more time to test all of their new toys 3-5 years, plus they need to drain nato of their toys who can do better than lo iq poorly trained ukro nazi.
As someone who has been watching this conflict unfold, the reason you haven't been bombarded with videos on it is because the reality doesn't fit the narrative. Ukraine is losing.
They're mass producing ammo and middles right now, they're on full time war economy. They know the only way this ends is with the end of them or nato 😬
At no time has Russia said their goals were to "end NATO".
They clearly stated their strategic goals in Ukraine and have been following those almost to the letter.
They have also clearly outlined their long-term goals in the Primakov Doctrine, and that states a desire to escape the mono-polar Anglo-American monetary hegemony. They have accomplished that.
Incredibly naive to think that they will successfully take Ukraine without wiping out nato. The only think keeping Ukraine going at this point is NATO with the arms and the bodies, ukriane was finished months and months ago.
The Wagner leader and other various leaders have been saying very different things. The other day the leader of the Wagner group was telling people to join now so they have better rank "before the big one". Also, Ukraine recently said it doesn't stop until there are tanks in Moscow, Russia has already said it's basically in a hot war with Nato.
Look, I honeslty want my outlook to be wrong. I do think Russia wouldn't push further than what their objectives are but we're entering an economy that's looking like it's going to be the same or worse than the Great Depression. Couple that with the threat of instability with the Petro Dollar from BRICS as well as the left losing footing in the US. We ARE going to be in a hot war before 2024 or around that time. Will it be Russia provoking it? Don't think so. But look at Belarus, Poland and Moldova. There is a ton a moving pieces right now.
This is a more reasonable position, or at least it's stated more clearly.
Apologies for the MSNBC taunt, but they're the ones pushing hardest for NATO direct confrontation with Russia.
I would say WW3 has already started, but it's asymmetrical. It is the Leviathan against We The People of the world.
Will this turn into a hot war? You're right, it is certainly on the table, but I think there are other scenarios still in play that may allow us to avoid this.
I could care less what Ukraine thinks. There are not going to be Ukrainian or NATO tanks in Russia. If a hot war were to break out between NATO and Russia, it would be very ugly. I'm not sure the US and EU are prepared for a land war.
Completely agree, we aren't ready for a land war however look at the people running all the helms of the government and military right now.
Yea my initial statement was overly simplified. Let's hope friend, the other situations prevail and the worst we end up with is a deep deep recession. Maybe I've swallowed the black pill but all I can do is take statements that have been said recently from said leaders and look at history with some what similar circumstances (albeit history is never the same, it only rhymes).
Russia is however preparing for a larger war, whether that war will come we can only hope that it doesn't. The Baltic states are playing games of chicken right now along side Germany and some of the EU while we're running large scale drills in South Korean and the Taiwan straight. I really can't see how any of this doesn't end up in some kind of hot war in the next year or so. I'm also younger, quite frankly was a child in 9/11 so maybe I'm wrong and this is just "another day in the world". There's just so maybe aspects geopolitically, financially and militarily in play right now that only happens in periods of history that follow violent bloody world conflict.
Look, I know I've had a few conversations with you before. You're very intelligent. I sincerely hope you are correct in your predictions but I truly believe that Russia is preparing for the inevitable based off all the circumstances I've mentioned in my previous comments.
Running low on missiles, yes. They aren't going to fire every single missile they have, and they are building new ones. The point is that they wouldn't have enough missiles for a real war against NATO. 80 missiles in a day is nothing. We fired more in 10 minutes in Iraq.
Do we though? I mean at the end of the day Ukraine isn't our problem. They're a third world shithole country on the other side of the world. I personally believe the best play the USA can make is just to let them duke it out then when Russia inevitably wins we open stronger trade relations with them.
Lol, what the fuck are you smoking? What are we running low on? You think we are running low but Russia isn't?? Hahahahahhahahahaha! Cope harder commie zigger.
"Less than a month into the Libyan conflict, NATO is running short of precision bombs, highlighting the limitations of Britain, France and other European countries in sustaining even a relatively small military action over an extended period of time, according to senior NATO and U.S. officials."
Do you... Do you not know that the UK is the same as Britain???
What are you basing the missile counts on? Genuinely curious about your data.
There's lots of data out there all pointing at the same general numbers. Russia depleted its stores, which were never very big to begin with, very early on. Most people just ignorantly assume that Russia's air force is just like the Wests, and must be full of guided bombs as a rule. Not at all the case. Not only are they not equipped in the same way by a wide margin, they aren't even used in the same way, which is why their air force has largely been absent from this war compared to how NATO air forces would have prosecuted it. For NATO, our air forces get a lot more funding and attention than Russia's does (well, that's true for every branch). So the result is that Russia has to pick carefully what it sets its air force up to do. It HAS to set them up to be a primarily interception and strategic bombing air force, owing to the size of landmass they have to defend and their lack of aircraft carriers from which they might launch nuclear sorties. Those are very demanding roles so that leaves little for air supremacy (think air to air combat), SEAD (suppression of enemy air defenses), or CAS (combat air support). So they really don't do SEAD at all because that is very difficult and requires a lot of specialty aircraft and munitions. That leaves them with a little bit for air supremacy and CAS. Well, if you don't do SEAD then you're pretty SOL when you go up against an enemy with any kind of air defense network, which Ukraine has a bit of. So Russian CAS and air interdiction efforts are largely constrained to the areas directly over the front. This is highly dangerous still, so they're not going all out on it or they'd ground their air force into nothing. They also simply do not have the ISR to support either mission. And of course their PGMs were never that good or in enough quantities to matter. They can still produce some of them at a modest rate, but not enough to keep up an air campaign. So what we see is Russia using its still experimental Kinzhal missiles, which are very spotty in their ability to actually make it all the way to the target, and a lot of missiles that were not designed for ground attack, like KH-22s (anti-ship missiles) and S-300/400 missiles (which are for air defense). We also saw them lean heavily on Iranian suicide drones, which is just pathetic. So we can be sure that they simply do not have the kinds of stockpiles of real PGMs that they'd need to fire dozens per day, every day. The exact data I have on just what those stockpiles look like is classified.
Lol, you stupid faggot. You can't use an internet search website?? Hahahha! Retard! I jusy gave you the answer and you're like "nope, I'm still retarded. YOUR fault!"
Lol! No, they absolutely do not have that many ballistic missiles. They have some 6000 WARHEADS. And most of those are on MIRV ballistic missiles. Same with the US. And ICBM missiles are not in play here so what the fuck are you even talking about? And what ammo is the US "running out of"?? You Russian zigger faggots will literally say anything, won't you... You need your necks stretched. All of you. How's the conquest of Bakhmut going btw?
US is running out of shells to send ukriane, We've given up the idea of helping them match russias artillery strength.
lol!!! Where the fuck are you getting this shit?? Russia is the one running out of shells, which is why they're buying them from NORTH KOREA! The US is not even close to running out of shells, we're just not going to give Ukraine all of our stock for obvious reasons.
And yes, even though that is CNN quoting someone, I know this information to be true. Explosions are something we can easily track with out intelligence apparatus, and so we can tell when there is a decrease in the rate of artillery exchange. Both sides have reduced, but Russia has reduced FAR more than Ukraine has, mainly due to a lack of supply. Other factors include logistics failures or interdictions, losses due to action, losses to do wear and tear, and general incompetence. With HIMARS, Ukraine started being able to accurately target Russia supply depots, which they very poorly maintained and didn't conceal (due to poor training and incompetence). This severely depleted their stocks in a short period of time without them being fired, but more importantly it forced them to relocate their supply depots outside of HIMARS range. This increases the logistics train to get them to the firing positions of the artillery. And when HIMARS lacked depots to shoot at, the Russian artillery became the next targets, so they had to move back too because they're extremely easy to spot using ISR assets and they lack mobility.
Doesnt mean America doesnt still have plenty, but we just dont have any more we are willing to send them in excess.
Right, only we still have many other things we can send them besides our 155mm shells. The entire Russian concept of artillery fires has been defeated by the new reality of war. They relied on volume of fire as the main killing effect of their artillery. They use cheaply made, inaccurate artillery and do not supply their shooters with enough intelligence (or training) to accurately hit. They don't have a good system for BDA and reservicing of targets. Ukraine focused on intelligence and networking of different fires elements to maximize the effectiveness of each gun. This turned their old Soviet guns into much more effective and economical weapons. When they started getting more accurate western guns like the M777, they were already well-versed in the network and ISR side of fires, so they made highly effective use of the guns. This meant that they simply didn't need to fire as much to get the same or better effect as the Russians. It's like a sniper rifle vs a squad automatic weapon. They are two different classes of weapons that get very different results, even though both can kill you just as dead. The best part of this conflict is how brilliantly it is shining a light on the inadequacies of our defense production capability and our ability to move equipment and supplies. These things are being addressed so that the US and its allies will be that much better at meeting its own needs in future conflicts... though Russia certainly won't be around to take part in those conflicts so it likely won't matter. China certainly would not be in the same class of war unless they figure out how to teleport everything to North America or Europe.
But they WILL be able to tell who was born male and female by said skeletons and if the Human race continues on somehow will always be remembered as such... AHAHAHAHHA
This will save lives in the long run. When young boys and old men make up your front line - the Russians have a Human Rights obligation to remove the leaders sending them
It seems like a stalemate to me. No side has made significant progress in months. Ukraine takes some bombed-out village, then Russia takes it back, process repeats. I have to admit, when the war started I thought Putin would have taken Kiev in a matter of a couple months. Seems like a weird strategy to hold back when your enemy is getting continuously resupplied by NATO.
Yes it can, the enemy only has so many soldiers they can send to die. Russia can win by simply bombing to death all the enemy soldiers over time. Nato/us troops will need to get involved to keep it going.
The west is also behind on the munitions and supplies they are supplying aswell. not nearly as many tanks as they want, no jets, and they cant keep up with the amount of artillery shells ukriane needs to match russian artillery.
The Stingers were there from day one. If you remember, the US had seen the buildup and warned 2 weeks in advance and sent tons of stingers and javelins.
Personally, I think Russia didn't expect that much resistance. They thought it would be like the US walking into Iraq, where whole battalions were surrendering and/or running for the hills left and right. It turns out that the glowies have also been training Ukrainians at least since 2016, so their tactics have evolved significantly from Soviet doctrine. Maybe it's not as simple as "trying harder" for Russia at this point. They have a big military, but the losses are significant and they cannot commit to a total war without risking leaving the rest of the country open to western aggression.
Russia is winning the attrition war. They are fine to keep this going, while the west cripples itself to try and prop up ukriane. While ukriane sends all its best best to die. While russia strengthens its relationships with other countries like india, iran, china, etc.
What's the endgame? Both sides are losing many soldiers, but neither is close to running out. Plus Ukraine has access to basically infinite equipment and ammo from NATO.
Russia isnt losing that much according to actual evidence people can find. only like 13k new funeral registries of soldiers back in russia. That was before bahkmut though. Meanwhile there is no evidence at all to prove anything good about ukriane losses.
Only the opposite, talk of many bodies being left to rot as to not have to count them as dead. Ukriane dragging men out of their homes to force them to fight. etc.
We will likely never really know the true death counts due to severe propaganda. But from what i can tell ukriane is doing a lot worse. like how russia is willing to retreat from places to save lives, while ukriane desperately holds on to every inch no matter the cost. same with their offensives. Russia takes it slow and steady using their artillery advantage. Ukriane actually sends waves of men in probing attacks over and over until they can hopefully take their target no matter the cost of life. lyman and kherson city were that until russia decided to pull back. kharkov was barely defend by russia. All other ukriane offensives were complete failures.
I find it interesting how Russia is using the globalists' desperate desire for propaganda victories, and their psychopathic disregard for human life, against them.
It’s the trailer park whore who assaults some dude five times her size because she thinks he won’t smack her back to bed because she’s got a boyfriend standing nearby. Turns out her boyfriend is a pussy and would rather watch her get smacked around than risk taking a smack himself
Taking out a puppet wouldn't accomplish much and it would turn more normies against them because they've been programmed to admire him. Edit - not that NPCs matter, it just lets the real powers justify more severe evil actions.
You dont think they have another US asset lined up and ready to take his place? Peace wouldnt come.
Zelensky is doing terribly, why would they want to risk someone smarter taking his place? Let him continue to fail as the west cripples itself propping up ukraine.
Russia's strategy is to keep grinding down the Uke Army & NATO until it is all dust. So far it's going pretty well, thanks to lunatic Zelensky. That's why Russia doesn't kill him.
So long as there IS a Uke army (containing actual Nazis) and NATO (US deep state & DOD) still thinks it rules the world, there cannot be peace for Russia. Any 'peace' would just be giving the Nazis time to rebuild forces to attack Russia again. That's what happened with the Minsk treaty, and the collective West admitted that was their goal from the start.
Russia is not making that mistake again.
I wouldn't be surprised if Russia has privately told Zelensky that if he tries to stop the war, they will kill him.
Kremlin's army is overrated. Without nukes, Russia would be conquered by much smaller army. With nukes it behaves like crybaby. "We can attack your whole country, but you can't attack our town. Otherwise we use bravely nukes, because you don't have nukes."
We have no defense against these either. It's one of the ways in which Russia is ahead of us militarily now. Supposedly we're working on a defense system for it, but it's still in the build stage and years away from deployment.
Our grandparents would've had the damn thing done in months, but we have built up so many layers of bureaucracy, that's impossible now.
This was a massive middle finger to the globalist US deep state. They fired six successful hypersconics, we have zero successful hypersconics anywhere. We don't even really have a good way to defend against them state side...
Hit all their bases and parliament and be done with it.
They did. Apparently they hit the command centre with US military who were basically planning and leading the operation; given a large delegation of ukro-general staff visited the US embassy immediately after one can only assume mass casualties.
The Kinzhal does mach 10, nothing exists - today - to counter it.
And the Senate.
The Congress is both chambers
Didn't know that. All these years, I thought they were separate entities. Thanks.
It's a common misperception.
When the media says "Congressman" they are referring to the House.
When they say "Senator", they are obviously referring to the Senate.
But in the Constitution, Congress refers to both chambers.
We should call the House members "Representatives", but that term is too broad.
So we get confusion.
To be honest with you, the whole place disgusts me so much, I've only given the joint scant mental attention. I think the 'Congressman' and 'Senator' titles have always thrown me. Thanks very much for your clarification.
Anyways, they're all a bunch of traitors, under the same roof.
And ALL exempt from any vaccine mandates -and ALL with major shares in Big Pharma and the Military Industrial Complex, including MTG, bless her.
When I was working in the media we were told that, to avoid confusion, it is best to refer to members of the House of Representatives as "Representatives" or "Members of Congress", while reserving the term "Senator" for members of the Senate.
A senator is a congressman, but a congressman isn't necessarily a senator.
All the "creatures".
I just call the entire body (the House and Senate) “the legislature.”
IMO it’s weird to lump the Senate in with the House by referring to it all as “Congress,” especially when Representatives carry the “Congressman” title and not Senators.
they are separate entities.
But both are separate house ls of congress.
Thanks. I'm not the brightest. I'm just hoping my heart is in the right place.
Titie left and titie right
Active and passive sodomites
Excellent, succinct explanation!
And Hollywood.
Especially Hollywood. God, that place has gone to shit.
And Vindman.
https://youtu.be/PgWfwzLEAE8
Thanks Obama.
BINGO!!!! "I will, just wait until after the election", wink wink sucky sucky. We have that capability, we gave it to the Russians via Obamy and the MIC for the $$$$$.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. They shouldn't be fucking around in other countries if they don't want to occasionally be the one hit with a missile instead of just chucking them at third worlders.
Video from 2022 but damn that's fast. Why does anyone think fucking around with Russia they can win? They have the capability to manufacturer weapons faster than us. They are probably the most capable ground force in the world. US always maintains superiority via Air and Sea. Both of which Russia can match or minimum effectively counter. No way anyone is beating them in Ukraine. It's preposterous. I don't think they want to just blow Ukraine off the map due to a large Russian population their, but no one is looking for peace in the West so they are given no choice but to destroy Ukraine as we know it.
Boomer post-Cold War PTSD mentality. They spent their formative years being scared to death of the USSR. When it collapsed, boomers drew themselves a mental picture of Russia being a weak joke. A place to laugh at and no longer fear.
This thinking never had a basis in reality, particularly since it conveniently cuts off right after Soviet collapse and ignores over two decades of Putin.
I wonder if we're at the point where if China cuts us off, we would be unable to manufacture military vehicles once our stockpile of certain components runs out.
Yes. True.
Source: American with a brain
We can still make dildos in van nuys so army not concerned yet
two years from now they'll be 10,000,000 yuan each
Maybe that US defector gave the Russians some good intel as to where he might have been too in the country prior to being sent to the front with Nazi Battalions.
Or...
Get this...
Wait even more until all that's left is the overinflated piggy banks of near-dead politicians and their spawn.
I think Putin realized, from Z's latest rant, that they're running out of political capital for money laundering and enough damage has been done. Hopefully him, Trump, and anyone else that's against the globalists are watching where the rats swim after they jump ship. That's the real victory.
They're doing it exactly right so far, cripple infrastructure and force them to drag this out. The Russians could even lose territory for months and return for a part 2 that way. It gives them so many options, it's brilliant. If they were to drop the bomb it would come down to a standoff eventually.
I posted a video almost 11 months ago. Basically, this former CIA analyst who is now dead, laid out their strategy, being exactly that. Saying that the Westerners have such a different view of how war is supposed to be for that they would never see it coming in fall into the trap.
Do happen to have the link to this,, would love to watch it?
Here you go. A long interview But worth it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuIVYKReWPA
This is Vietnam part 2.0
Except we had more legitimate reasons to be in nam
I was thinking these missile attacks might be the first step in the expected Russian surge they've been building up for.
👆🏻
They need more time to test all of their new toys 3-5 years, plus they need to drain nato of their toys who can do better than lo iq poorly trained ukro nazi.
LOL!
so much for them running out of missiles....
Literally, everything the west says about this conflict is total bollocks.
Including this.
Where’s the combat footage? It’s the new “why is every hospital in the United States empty?”
It definitely has that “not real” Covid flava.
Nobody seems to be able to answer that
Where are all the embedded journalists? The cell phone footage we're usually flooded with?
https://t.me/s/intelslava
Here ya go, there are lots, but you have to look. I will warn people with sensitive dispositions you may want to avoid this.
As someone who has been watching this conflict unfold, the reason you haven't been bombarded with videos on it is because the reality doesn't fit the narrative. Ukraine is losing.
They're mass producing ammo and middles right now, they're on full time war economy. They know the only way this ends is with the end of them or nato 😬
I've got to push back on this a bit.
At no time has Russia said their goals were to "end NATO".
They clearly stated their strategic goals in Ukraine and have been following those almost to the letter.
They have also clearly outlined their long-term goals in the Primakov Doctrine, and that states a desire to escape the mono-polar Anglo-American monetary hegemony. They have accomplished that.
Incredibly naive to think that they will successfully take Ukraine without wiping out nato. The only think keeping Ukraine going at this point is NATO with the arms and the bodies, ukriane was finished months and months ago.
NATO countries are not going to go to war over Ukraine. The appetite for continued monetary support is waning.
Again, when has Russia ever suggested they have any intent to attack NATO?
Do you watch MSNBC by any chance?
Admittedly naive on this but seems like NATO has a bigger agenda against Russia than vice versa.
Which one has been encroaching on the front door of the other?
Of course, Russia has been pushing west into NATO countries since forever. Not the other way around. Don't you know Putin bad, jack. C'mon man.
No, I don't watch* MSNBC 😂.
The Wagner leader and other various leaders have been saying very different things. The other day the leader of the Wagner group was telling people to join now so they have better rank "before the big one". Also, Ukraine recently said it doesn't stop until there are tanks in Moscow, Russia has already said it's basically in a hot war with Nato.
Look, I honeslty want my outlook to be wrong. I do think Russia wouldn't push further than what their objectives are but we're entering an economy that's looking like it's going to be the same or worse than the Great Depression. Couple that with the threat of instability with the Petro Dollar from BRICS as well as the left losing footing in the US. We ARE going to be in a hot war before 2024 or around that time. Will it be Russia provoking it? Don't think so. But look at Belarus, Poland and Moldova. There is a ton a moving pieces right now.
This is a more reasonable position, or at least it's stated more clearly.
Apologies for the MSNBC taunt, but they're the ones pushing hardest for NATO direct confrontation with Russia.
I would say WW3 has already started, but it's asymmetrical. It is the Leviathan against We The People of the world.
Will this turn into a hot war? You're right, it is certainly on the table, but I think there are other scenarios still in play that may allow us to avoid this.
I could care less what Ukraine thinks. There are not going to be Ukrainian or NATO tanks in Russia. If a hot war were to break out between NATO and Russia, it would be very ugly. I'm not sure the US and EU are prepared for a land war.
Completely agree, we aren't ready for a land war however look at the people running all the helms of the government and military right now.
Yea my initial statement was overly simplified. Let's hope friend, the other situations prevail and the worst we end up with is a deep deep recession. Maybe I've swallowed the black pill but all I can do is take statements that have been said recently from said leaders and look at history with some what similar circumstances (albeit history is never the same, it only rhymes).
Russia is however preparing for a larger war, whether that war will come we can only hope that it doesn't. The Baltic states are playing games of chicken right now along side Germany and some of the EU while we're running large scale drills in South Korean and the Taiwan straight. I really can't see how any of this doesn't end up in some kind of hot war in the next year or so. I'm also younger, quite frankly was a child in 9/11 so maybe I'm wrong and this is just "another day in the world". There's just so maybe aspects geopolitically, financially and militarily in play right now that only happens in periods of history that follow violent bloody world conflict.
Look, I know I've had a few conversations with you before. You're very intelligent. I sincerely hope you are correct in your predictions but I truly believe that Russia is preparing for the inevitable based off all the circumstances I've mentioned in my previous comments.
don't tempt me with a good time
Get ready friend, it's going to happen. Only one way out of this deep depression were heading into and that's war.
My body is ready
Running low on missiles, yes. They aren't going to fire every single missile they have, and they are building new ones. The point is that they wouldn't have enough missiles for a real war against NATO. 80 missiles in a day is nothing. We fired more in 10 minutes in Iraq.
We are running very low from giving all our shit to Ukraine
We have to end this madness now
Lol. Are you against Lockheed and Boeing (and others) making millions?
Do we though? I mean at the end of the day Ukraine isn't our problem. They're a third world shithole country on the other side of the world. I personally believe the best play the USA can make is just to let them duke it out then when Russia inevitably wins we open stronger trade relations with them.
Note that that's a Ukraine shill you're interacting with there.
Lol, what the fuck are you smoking? What are we running low on? You think we are running low but Russia isn't?? Hahahahahhahahahaha! Cope harder commie zigger.
Javelins, there was a spate of articles that we are diminishing our own supplies last year
NATO ran out of bombs on Libya.
https://www.nationalreview.com/the-feed/good-news-nato-running-out-munitions-libya-greg-pollowitz/
"Less than a month into the Libyan conflict, NATO is running short of precision bombs, highlighting the limitations of Britain, France and other European countries in sustaining even a relatively small military action over an extended period of time, according to senior NATO and U.S. officials."
Libya.
We also fired a fuck ton more missiles than Russia has. And it was Italy and the UK who ran out, not us.
And Britain and France...
What are you basing the missile counts on? Genuinely curious about your data.
Do you... Do you not know that the UK is the same as Britain???
There's lots of data out there all pointing at the same general numbers. Russia depleted its stores, which were never very big to begin with, very early on. Most people just ignorantly assume that Russia's air force is just like the Wests, and must be full of guided bombs as a rule. Not at all the case. Not only are they not equipped in the same way by a wide margin, they aren't even used in the same way, which is why their air force has largely been absent from this war compared to how NATO air forces would have prosecuted it. For NATO, our air forces get a lot more funding and attention than Russia's does (well, that's true for every branch). So the result is that Russia has to pick carefully what it sets its air force up to do. It HAS to set them up to be a primarily interception and strategic bombing air force, owing to the size of landmass they have to defend and their lack of aircraft carriers from which they might launch nuclear sorties. Those are very demanding roles so that leaves little for air supremacy (think air to air combat), SEAD (suppression of enemy air defenses), or CAS (combat air support). So they really don't do SEAD at all because that is very difficult and requires a lot of specialty aircraft and munitions. That leaves them with a little bit for air supremacy and CAS. Well, if you don't do SEAD then you're pretty SOL when you go up against an enemy with any kind of air defense network, which Ukraine has a bit of. So Russian CAS and air interdiction efforts are largely constrained to the areas directly over the front. This is highly dangerous still, so they're not going all out on it or they'd ground their air force into nothing. They also simply do not have the ISR to support either mission. And of course their PGMs were never that good or in enough quantities to matter. They can still produce some of them at a modest rate, but not enough to keep up an air campaign. So what we see is Russia using its still experimental Kinzhal missiles, which are very spotty in their ability to actually make it all the way to the target, and a lot of missiles that were not designed for ground attack, like KH-22s (anti-ship missiles) and S-300/400 missiles (which are for air defense). We also saw them lean heavily on Iranian suicide drones, which is just pathetic. So we can be sure that they simply do not have the kinds of stockpiles of real PGMs that they'd need to fire dozens per day, every day. The exact data I have on just what those stockpiles look like is classified.
So you don't have any data. Thanks
Lol, you stupid faggot. You can't use an internet search website?? Hahahha! Retard! I jusy gave you the answer and you're like "nope, I'm still retarded. YOUR fault!"
LOL!
you seem to forget they have well over 3,000 ballistic nucs... or do they not count?
rate this shit is going, the US will be out of ammo again (like they were when Trump came to office)
UK, Germany etc are already almost fucked.
You can't keep weapons manufacturers supplied with money if you never use your supply.
true enough...
Pharma have had their turn, now back to the MIC
Lol! No, they absolutely do not have that many ballistic missiles. They have some 6000 WARHEADS. And most of those are on MIRV ballistic missiles. Same with the US. And ICBM missiles are not in play here so what the fuck are you even talking about? And what ammo is the US "running out of"?? You Russian zigger faggots will literally say anything, won't you... You need your necks stretched. All of you. How's the conquest of Bakhmut going btw?
US is running out of shells to send ukriane, We've given up the idea of helping them match russias artillery strength.
Doesnt mean America doesnt still have plenty, but we just dont have any more we are willing to send them in excess.
lol!!! Where the fuck are you getting this shit?? Russia is the one running out of shells, which is why they're buying them from NORTH KOREA! The US is not even close to running out of shells, we're just not going to give Ukraine all of our stock for obvious reasons.
https://www.defensenews.com/global/asia-pacific/2022/11/02/north-korea-covertly-shipping-artillery-to-russia-says-white-house/
https://www.csis.org/analysis/united-states-running-out-weapons-send-ukraine
https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/10/politics/russian-artillery-fire-down-75-percent-ukraine/index.html
And yes, even though that is CNN quoting someone, I know this information to be true. Explosions are something we can easily track with out intelligence apparatus, and so we can tell when there is a decrease in the rate of artillery exchange. Both sides have reduced, but Russia has reduced FAR more than Ukraine has, mainly due to a lack of supply. Other factors include logistics failures or interdictions, losses due to action, losses to do wear and tear, and general incompetence. With HIMARS, Ukraine started being able to accurately target Russia supply depots, which they very poorly maintained and didn't conceal (due to poor training and incompetence). This severely depleted their stocks in a short period of time without them being fired, but more importantly it forced them to relocate their supply depots outside of HIMARS range. This increases the logistics train to get them to the firing positions of the artillery. And when HIMARS lacked depots to shoot at, the Russian artillery became the next targets, so they had to move back too because they're extremely easy to spot using ISR assets and they lack mobility.
Right, only we still have many other things we can send them besides our 155mm shells. The entire Russian concept of artillery fires has been defeated by the new reality of war. They relied on volume of fire as the main killing effect of their artillery. They use cheaply made, inaccurate artillery and do not supply their shooters with enough intelligence (or training) to accurately hit. They don't have a good system for BDA and reservicing of targets. Ukraine focused on intelligence and networking of different fires elements to maximize the effectiveness of each gun. This turned their old Soviet guns into much more effective and economical weapons. When they started getting more accurate western guns like the M777, they were already well-versed in the network and ISR side of fires, so they made highly effective use of the guns. This meant that they simply didn't need to fire as much to get the same or better effect as the Russians. It's like a sniper rifle vs a squad automatic weapon. They are two different classes of weapons that get very different results, even though both can kill you just as dead. The best part of this conflict is how brilliantly it is shining a light on the inadequacies of our defense production capability and our ability to move equipment and supplies. These things are being addressed so that the US and its allies will be that much better at meeting its own needs in future conflicts... though Russia certainly won't be around to take part in those conflicts so it likely won't matter. China certainly would not be in the same class of war unless they figure out how to teleport everything to North America or Europe.
They aren't running low on missiles
They are, if you actually listen to non-Russian sources.
They’ve been firing missiles every day for a year, how long were we firing missiles every day in Iraq?
Lol no they haven't. And we were at war for 20 years. Never ran out. And we fired WAY more.
They literally have been.
Yes we never ran out, that’s my point, because we didn’t fire them for very long.
And the US hypersonic missile test last weekend failed to launch. We are so fucked. At least we have diversity! …right…?
No such thing as diversity in a nuclear holocaust... We're all the same color when charred to a crisp
If I'm still alive I'll be hunting leftists and eating them.
why would you put that garbage in your body
Fair question. I'd be fucked at that point anyway, so it would be all about hate.
It's not about the nutrition. It's about sending a message.
A delicious message.
kek
LOL savage.
Running on pure hanger, lol.
Cows turn plants into meat. Vegans can't be too different.
Pretty sure vegans don’t chew the cud unless you count strange sodomite practices
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5EKuIus-oE
Alex Jones??
Once you go black, it may be attributed to a nuclear attack.
Skeletons have no pronouns
But they WILL be able to tell who was born male and female by said skeletons and if the Human race continues on somehow will always be remembered as such... AHAHAHAHHA
Russians are also dead naming the diversity brigades
The survivors will know if white meat and dark meat taste different.
Not only do we have diversity, we also have faggots and trannies! Putin doesn't stand a chance.
And spooks in command!
It failed because we didn't have enough diversity. If only we had trained more illegal future-doctors, scientists and teachers!
Yes DEI IS #1 priority
Good. It's high time Russia quits playing nice. Just end ukraine already.
This will save lives in the long run. When young boys and old men make up your front line - the Russians have a Human Rights obligation to remove the leaders sending them
They don't want to end Ukraine though, they want to take it back as Kiev is basically the ancestral home of Russians.
But… Ukraine is winning…
some are ... the ones claiming that they are winning are winning.
(the "winners" are pulling in millions to their Swiss bank accounts)
No ukraine has been losing and any claims to the contrary are fucking propaganda.
It seems like a stalemate to me. No side has made significant progress in months. Ukraine takes some bombed-out village, then Russia takes it back, process repeats. I have to admit, when the war started I thought Putin would have taken Kiev in a matter of a couple months. Seems like a weird strategy to hold back when your enemy is getting continuously resupplied by NATO.
Battle of attrition that Russia is winning
Attrition cannot work when your enemy is being resupplied by dozens of the wealthiest counties in the world.
Yes it can, the enemy only has so many soldiers they can send to die. Russia can win by simply bombing to death all the enemy soldiers over time. Nato/us troops will need to get involved to keep it going.
The west is also behind on the munitions and supplies they are supplying aswell. not nearly as many tanks as they want, no jets, and they cant keep up with the amount of artillery shells ukriane needs to match russian artillery.
Those countries have already admitted that they cannot keep up with the demand of ammunition
I feel like we are watching the Vietnam war being replayed.
The Russians have the conventional firepower to flatten a lot more - especially before all the Stingers arrived on masse.
The Russians must of wondered why the US didn't flatten Hanoi and mine the harbor.
Why not commit to winning a war?
The Stingers were there from day one. If you remember, the US had seen the buildup and warned 2 weeks in advance and sent tons of stingers and javelins.
Personally, I think Russia didn't expect that much resistance. They thought it would be like the US walking into Iraq, where whole battalions were surrendering and/or running for the hills left and right. It turns out that the glowies have also been training Ukrainians at least since 2016, so their tactics have evolved significantly from Soviet doctrine. Maybe it's not as simple as "trying harder" for Russia at this point. They have a big military, but the losses are significant and they cannot commit to a total war without risking leaving the rest of the country open to western aggression.
Russia is winning the attrition war. They are fine to keep this going, while the west cripples itself to try and prop up ukriane. While ukriane sends all its best best to die. While russia strengthens its relationships with other countries like india, iran, china, etc.
He means that the propagandists, who are pushing the war, are winning.
Wut
"winning" the war - nah - they don't care - building up a stable of sex slaves and millions in Swiss bank accounts - yup "winning" !!!
The ghost of keev is winning the war singlehandedly!
According to the Eurasian Times, we've got Russian subs operating off the coast of the United States and in the Mediterranean as well.
It's always been that way but they're reminding us.
It's estimated they have 58 submarines and they've been advanced and upgraded since the Soviet Union fell apart in 1991.
Gawd I would hope that subs have been upgraded in 30 years - otherwise - they really aren't going around undetected.
You know how to spot a Russian sub mariner? Turn off the lights.
Alex Jones said that Russia has subs with enough nukes to wipe out many major cities, and underwater nuke drones that can cause huge tsunamis.
Parking lot status is a go.
God I wish they'd hit the Un with one of those. Or congress.
Hitting Congress world, outfight, trigger war with Russia.
Let's fix our own problems and avoid that.
Congress is required to declare war.
if no Congress... it could be seen as a miss understanding.
I hope you're being facetious.
Congress are simply REPRESENTATIVES of the People; you know, the actual Government....
'The People' would declare a national day of celebration , if Russia hit Congress. Or Biden. or both.
Oh, now they aren't going to fuck around? WTF have they been doing the entire last year. LMAO
Bingo. They want us broke and battling each other. Makes for a weak country, which we obviously are now.
Asymmetrical warfare
They have been grinding meat with artillery 200k Ukrainians dead.
What's the endgame? Both sides are losing many soldiers, but neither is close to running out. Plus Ukraine has access to basically infinite equipment and ammo from NATO.
Infinite NATO ammo? Are you following the news fren?
Russia isnt losing that much according to actual evidence people can find. only like 13k new funeral registries of soldiers back in russia. That was before bahkmut though. Meanwhile there is no evidence at all to prove anything good about ukriane losses.
Only the opposite, talk of many bodies being left to rot as to not have to count them as dead. Ukriane dragging men out of their homes to force them to fight. etc.
We will likely never really know the true death counts due to severe propaganda. But from what i can tell ukriane is doing a lot worse. like how russia is willing to retreat from places to save lives, while ukriane desperately holds on to every inch no matter the cost. same with their offensives. Russia takes it slow and steady using their artillery advantage. Ukriane actually sends waves of men in probing attacks over and over until they can hopefully take their target no matter the cost of life. lyman and kherson city were that until russia decided to pull back. kharkov was barely defend by russia. All other ukriane offensives were complete failures.
I find it interesting how Russia is using the globalists' desperate desire for propaganda victories, and their psychopathic disregard for human life, against them.
Waiting for winter, perhaps
It’s the trailer park whore who assaults some dude five times her size because she thinks he won’t smack her back to bed because she’s got a boyfriend standing nearby. Turns out her boyfriend is a pussy and would rather watch her get smacked around than risk taking a smack himself
Looks like they work pretty good...
No more tax dollars or equipment for Pookraine
Heck, they haven't even started paying us back for the money we've already sent them!
I don't understand why they don't just take out Zelensky in a strike. Kill the CIA asset and let peace come.
Ukraine is an arena for MIC marketing. Countries wanna show off what their toys can do to secure deals
That's great, but I still don't understand why Russia just takes out Zelensky
Taking out a puppet wouldn't accomplish much and it would turn more normies against them because they've been programmed to admire him. Edit - not that NPCs matter, it just lets the real powers justify more severe evil actions.
jesus christ think more for a second.
You dont think they have another US asset lined up and ready to take his place? Peace wouldnt come.
Zelensky is doing terribly, why would they want to risk someone smarter taking his place? Let him continue to fail as the west cripples itself propping up ukraine.
Russia's strategy is to keep grinding down the Uke Army & NATO until it is all dust. So far it's going pretty well, thanks to lunatic Zelensky. That's why Russia doesn't kill him.
So long as there IS a Uke army (containing actual Nazis) and NATO (US deep state & DOD) still thinks it rules the world, there cannot be peace for Russia. Any 'peace' would just be giving the Nazis time to rebuild forces to attack Russia again. That's what happened with the Minsk treaty, and the collective West admitted that was their goal from the start.
Russia is not making that mistake again.
I wouldn't be surprised if Russia has privately told Zelensky that if he tries to stop the war, they will kill him.
I've wondered about this as well.
On today's episode of Fuck Around and Find Out, the Green Goblin learns what happens when he pokes the Bear with his Vienna Sausage.
Biden did this.
HUGE China brokered deal; Iran & Saudi Arabia restore diplomatic ties
The US will no longer be the world leader no matter who is potus.
Does Russia know the exact coordinates of DC?
a sensible leader would say "this cant keep escalating, lets negotiate a peace treaty"
of course, those types of leaders dont exist right now!
Accelerate it
... says Ukraine.
Well that's a trustworthy source!
Kremlin admits it
Kremlin's army is overrated. Without nukes, Russia would be conquered by much smaller army. With nukes it behaves like crybaby. "We can attack your whole country, but you can't attack our town. Otherwise we use bravely nukes, because you don't have nukes."
Quick! Let's send them $327,498,723,423,847,900 in additional aid!
"Yo NATO, ya want some? Come and get some!"
~Putin, probably
Russian Victory over ukraine = no war WW3 w/ the u.s. unless we attack them
Unless of course we start supporting "moderate rebels" again like with Syria.
Go Russia Go !!!
FUCK UKRAINE.
Oh yeah! Well we can surgically alter people to make them almost convincingly appear as the opposite sex.
So put THAT in your pipe and smoke it.. PUTIN!
neat! ⍨⃝📷
We have no defense against these either. It's one of the ways in which Russia is ahead of us militarily now. Supposedly we're working on a defense system for it, but it's still in the build stage and years away from deployment.
Our grandparents would've had the damn thing done in months, but we have built up so many layers of bureaucracy, that's impossible now.
This was a massive middle finger to the globalist US deep state. They fired six successful hypersconics, we have zero successful hypersconics anywhere. We don't even really have a good way to defend against them state side...
Quick!!
Send another billion!! That will solve the problem!!!
Iron dome has no chance here
There is something off about these supposed hypersonic missiles. Can't put my finger on it.