1388 Trump Truth on Tucker Carlson: "He doesn't hate me. At least, not anymore." (truthsocial.com) TRUMP TRUTH posted 77 days ago by PremAmerica 77 days ago by PremAmerica +1388 / -0 Truth Social Truth Social is America's "Big Tent" social media platform that encourages an open, free, and honest global conversation without discriminating on the basis of political ideology. truthsocial.com 120 comments share 120 comments share save hide report block hide replies
One time Tucker made a joke about Trump's hair on a Fox broadcast and later in the day Trump called Tucker and left a voicemail where he said " you may have better hair than I do but I get a lot more pussy than you".
Tucker said he listened to the voicemail and then thought to himself, well, he has a point.
When Tucker realized Trump got more pussy is when he began to hate him with a passion.
Tucker tried to tuck the Trump, but got Trumped.
Isn't Tucker gay? Not being a jerk, I really thought he was
we got ourselves some sensitive folks around here. Let me try something to see if PDW is still normal. All commies are faggots, and tranny's shouldnt twerk for lil kids :) hahaha
Nah just a regular old fashion faggot.
You got a source for this? If not, you need to label it as a shitpost.
You can't label a reply as a shitpost. And I made a mistake and said Fox when it was actually when Tucker worked for CNN. The story is factual.
But here you go Mr. Pulitzer:
You do it like this: \s
Tucker hasn’t worked for CNN since 2005, which is 18 years ago. Your leftist fake news source sucks. Why are you attacking Trump with something this old and questionable?
Because Tucker wrote the fucking article, that's why. You pearl clutching pussy. So it happened in 2005, so the fuck what? Tucker didn't even tell about it until this article in 2016. You thought I made the story up and I sourced it from the horse's mouth.
How in the fuck is it attacking Trump? Even Tucker said that Trump could be vulgar but he also was right on many issues. The story was exactly how we all know Trump reacts and him leaving Tucker a voicemail was funny. You asked for a source because you didn't believe what I posted and I provided one. Take the L and move on.
You are looking like a jackass.
Put your mirror away.
You got the source and now you have a sandy vag.
Uh oh. Ministry of Truth has accounts here.
Better than a mountain of lies, if you get my drift.
I remember tucker talking about this years ago. I thought it was pretty funny.
Tucker called him a demon
Sounds like penis envy
"Tucker, do u hate me?"
"Good. That's what I said to your wife. I told her there's no way that guy hates me."
Tucker is a means to an end. Any grown ass man who actually cares whether Tucker likes Trump is a pole-smoking faggot who needs to reevaluate his entire life.
What end is that exactly?
Shifting the Overton Window to the point where the normies will nod in approval as the Deep State traitors are dragged out into the street and hanged.
I love that
I dunno I just thought it sounded good, okay?
Answer: The 'end' that vindicates the half of the country that's been systematically abused by the other half that worship the tyrannical state.
The amount I care about Tucker's opinion varies on how controlled I think he is, which ebbs and flows
For serious tho. Real users should bookmark this.
Because the paid communists will be spamming this Tucker crap for the next two years.
But Tucker thinks he is a demon..
Cognitive dissonance is uncomfortable
Tucker just said he's tired of talking about Trump and wants to report on something else.
He said Sidney is a liar and Trump was demonic
Magic Johnson and Scottie Pippen hated each other, they were still on the Dream Team.
Jogger ball? Never heard of it
Where’s your source for this LARP?
Dominion lawsuit discovery
Tucker's boss sure hates Trump, though!
all mainstream media bosses hate trump. just because they're commie fucking faggots.
Hate the f-word but agree with the sentiment 100%, pede.
Which f word do you hate?
If it weren't for the first one, you wouldn't exist.
And the second one isn't homophobic and has nothing to do with gays as used on this forum. It just means Bill Mitchell.
Because Trump doesn't answer to them and their smear tactics don't work on him.
He renders them impotent in ways where they are used to being all powerful. That's why they really hate him. Because they can't push him around like they can everyone else.
Except when it comes to ratings. Coverage of GEOTUS is a cash cow that they all sorely miss.
Maybe but Old Man Murdock is no fan of DemFags...once he croaks his Libshit kids will turn Fox into another CNN.
So does Tucker, for that matter.
How could anyone hate our Favorite President?!
Totally insane jealousy of power that was won legally and held appropriately and mastered the world and made the American existence feel good and great again for four years.
And we now have bidengeddon.
Because he is our favorite, that's why. The political class hates us, along with whoever we love.
The numbers don't reflect that at all. FOX is interested in $$, which is no surprise, and DJT is not delivering the goods. I pray that he straightens out ASAP and starts running a respectable campaign again.
Fox is not a yardstick of any trends where MAGA is concerned. If you're taking Fox's surveys seriously, you should know that they hate Trump.
They betrayed him in 2020, and they will always tout any shitsuit like ¡Jeb! or 'Thirty' Pence over him. And I disagree about your assessment of him and his delivery of the goods.
MAGA has never stopped being the core of his campaign. He doesn't need to rebrand it, nor does he need a "respectable"[??] campaign. He needs to keep being Trump—no more or less.
And yet, Trump has rebranded. Instead of promoting a vision of a Great America (2015), he has focused nearly all of his energy towards coming up with playground nicknames for people and groups he doesn't like. This is a rebranding. It is also a terrible idea and I hope he knocks it off yesterday.
These are pretty clever 4D tactics though, the vast majority of his voters know that he's doing whatever it takes to rally the nation into action.
See how easy that is? Disagreements don't mean permanent blacklisting.
Politics is fluid and situational. Watch and learn.
And vice versa
Copium always has, and always will be, an easy thing to take.
Hard to recover from calling someone a demon but we understand your need to cope
Welcome to the real world, where most people don't want people like you to rule over them.
Mr. President, march onward and don’t worry about paltry feelings. The people will be standing behind you!
You are right, it is a dig at Tucker. But it is a friendly dig, and he is saying that all is forgiven. Remember, Trump invited Tucker to his air-conditioned private suite at the golf tournament in Bedminster, NJ after the reported incident.
It's not a dig at all. It's copium. Full stop.
That makes sense too. Thanks.
Trump gives ear to what Tucker says, and I've never seen evidence of Tucker advising him in any way other than exactly what I would say on the most important issues.
Tucker has the most popular show on cable news. Good place for Trump to reach normies with the MAGA message.
Once a RINO, always a RINO.
Same with Trump derangement syndrome, it never goes away
Tucker goes wherever the wind blows him.
President Trump is consistent.
He's the only person in the entire industry who had the courage to drop the J6 tapes. Someone doesn't have to be perfect all the time to be a damn good asset that the country would be in a much worse place without.
I thought McCarthy gave them to him.
I agree that at this point what he’s done was important but he’s no golden calf. I don’t think you’re saying he is. But all with a hefty spoonful of skepticism. I mean, he could have played the video we have ALL seen over and over again. Seems like it might have been just as revealing.
This was a distraction from the Jan 6th tapes. Stop promoting this stupid narrative. No one cares who like who as friends. Focus on the tapes and the false imprisonment of people.
Why is this stickied but Testimony of Twitter files in Congress was not.
Tucker prob meant he was tired of Trump "news" completely overtaking every topic and he hated talking about it and hoped it would be over soon
tucker doesn't strike me as someone who "hates" people
Do we have a way to see the post? I'm not getting a Truth account.
Whoever downvoted that is a certified faggot.
I like it when screenshot are provided, with a link in the comments. For all websites.
It's certainly helpful. Truth is really the only one that doesn't seem to allow people to embed.
Mods need to fix.
Tucker is ok He's on our side
Trump doesn't care if Tucker "likes" him, lol. He just wants to cause left wingers' heads to melt down. #success
At least Tucker is better than Hannity. I under why President Trump goes on there, to get his message out, but it still sucks seeing a back stabbing neocon like Hannity rewarded.
Cut the blackmail ties.
I just love the picture of him and Trump laughing at Mar-a-Lago
Are they still subservient and undermined by "them" like here, the Land of Shadowban and money protectors?
And I can only wonder why
We are on the look out for that. If the left would stop criminally violating Trump's American rights we could actually see how he does. Truth told, we have long been on a terrible trajectory and Trump's policies were turning us slightly in the right direction. And the American People could find nobody to push these long popular and common sense policies. Even talking about them was considered career suicide. A 3rd rail. Why would no one represent? Take a look what Trump's been going through? And he's like 100 times more resistant to gang harassment than a regular candidate. Teflon Don.
You have to start somewhere.
He still gets more pussy though.
give him unlimited access to write a book and find out
To be very fair, a big percentage of us didn't care for Trump for a long time either. Heck, I still vehemently disagree and dislike him on certain things even now.
So, here’s the thing:
The day that the news about the text messages came out, Tucker could have addressed it. Including the day Schumer brought it up on the Senate floor.
I watched live. Tucker did not bring it up for the entire show. He clipped portions of Schumer’s speech to address and left the part about the texts out.
Can’t trust him.
No that’s how you lose politics. You have to attack attack attack, stopping to addressing the lefts attacks and you lose the initiative. You’ll never gain it back either because the left will infinitely make things up to attack you with, only way to win against that is not to play.
All he needs to do is be square with Trump. No need to breathe air into this leftwing discord sowing political op.
Trump is much more rich, powerful, alpha and masculine than Tucker ever will be. Cucker is just jealous, but Trump is gracious enough to let it go.
Sure, bud. We know from experience now that the easiest way to disarm you is flattery. One denying and complimentary phone call would have been good enough.
We will never be able to make true progress when our one and only “accepted” voice is intentionally controlled opposition for profit.
I like what he says for the most part. If I stop liking it I'll stop paying attention to him.
You’ll always like what he says for the most part. That’s the whole point.
It just won’t ever go anywhere, and anytime it’s on the edge of maaaaaaaybe actually bringing something that will change things or spark something to print, the foot will always come off the gas and the docs will have been “lost in the mail”.
They’re using you.
YOU are the useful idiot.
I'm not like...counting on Tucker... for anything. I watch an average of 1 or sometimes 2
episodes (pirated on youtube) a week for the past few years. I understand what you're trying to say, and it could certainly hold a strong element of truth, but I feel like your thinking on this is a bit polarized.
a leading voice or a source for direction the past few years.
Truth Social certainly hasn't revolutionized right wing organization. This place is a ghost town inhabited only by only shills, Feds, raging emotionally unstable anti-socials who never learned it's ok to say "I don't know", and that just because you don't know where to go doesn't mean you've given up, and grizzled stubborn ogs who mostly still walk these figurative streets by force of habit. You can run a cost benefit analysis on just about everything, and there is very little you'll find that has only a benefits list. To gain a more circumspect understanding of something, it really helps if you can identify where you are making assumptions and try to determine if they are founded, if they are false, misdirected or incomplete. From my perspective it looks like you might have an assumption or two in your blind spots. Like maybe that you see TC as a champagne cork of sorts, holding back an outpouring of grassroots rightwing proactive movement. But is that realistically the case? Conceivably it could be. Yes I can deduce the possibility scenarios where those dynamics existence. I can also think of other scenarios where everything is less pegged down. Where a man could have genuine and relatable right wing opinions, or religious beliefs ... and work for a Multi-billion dollar corporation..and be on some degree of leash... but also have carved put a tenuous degree of more freedom... and make some decisions partially motivated by desire to maintain money, lifestyle, and convenience ... and also be in part to thank for providing a service that can provide some tangible benefits. I think those certainly in theory, could all be true. So say Murdock dies tomorrow and his shitlib kids get immediate access to Fox News and TCT is immediately canceled and they hire Chris Cuomo to host the 8 o'clock spot and They hire Brian Stelter as an associate,
Backup..just in case Hannity suffers a freak Jujitsu injury and develops a debilitating case of TMJ... and TCT is just gone overnight. Would the American right suddenly regain sense, reason, and moral courage as if a worm tongue was cut away from it's ear? Or would we still be facing most of the same obstacles and swimming against the same currents, and things would continue on just same as they are now, and only thing different is there would be one less voice, outlet, figure... hub of mutual interest?