J.K. Rowling Doesn't Back Down From Transgender Beliefs, Says 'There's Something Dangerous About This Movement'
Author J.K. Rowling has received threats for simply acknowledging biological reality. And on a recent podcast, she stood by those statements.
Don't care much for Harry Potter, or Rowling's views about our beloved president, but her stand on this issue alone was enough for me to buy that Hogwarts video game and add it to my collection.
Im still pissed she retcon'd dumbledore into being a faggot.
That was her paving the way for this tranny shit. She helped build this behemoth cult. Now it’s her responsibility to dismantle it
She helped start the snowball, and she got ran over by it at the bottom.
Tranny ideology is DEMONIC. It is based on the god BAPHOMET.
Figure it out, people. I am not being hyperbolic here.
This! Look up Elite Gender Inversion. These people are sick!
You are not wrong.
Yeah, you’re right. I’m absolutely certain that the people who are transitioning had Baphomet on their mind. Jesus Christ. This problem is bad enough and urgent enough without needing to bring Baphomet into it. Jesus Christ the fucking retards around here.
Did they use a Ouija board too?
Try not to use the Lord's name in vain, you filthy heathen, thanks.
You've mentioned our Lord Jesus Chrsit twice now in a pejorative sense. Whom do you serve?
Ephesians 6:12 (NKJV)
12 For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of [a]the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.
Amen. My tolerance to ignorance is waning. This has ways been a war of influence. To believe that the devil has no cards to play is borderline head in sand tier.
It's not about what the people who are victims of the brainwashing are thinking or worshipping, it has more to do with the people who use vast amounts of wealth and power to push it on society.
You are thinking about this from the bottom side of the totem pole and not the top. This psychotic shit didn't come from nowhere and it's massively funded and pushed around all western countries simultaneously. It's clear someone has an agenda and is pushing it.
Most people have no sense of perspective, and are incapable of seeing the bigger picture.
Gay rights activists were screaming about legalizing Gay marriage for many years before anyone took it seriously as something that might actually happen.
So how come during all that time, during 80's and 90's, we never heard a word about transgenders? How come we weren't told how they are the MOST oppressed?
And when Gay rights was still controversial, how come we never heard that Gay people of color are even more oppressed than White Gays,? The same way we now hear how transgender people of color are the most oppressed of the most oppressed?
It's all incrementalism. The rot just keeps getting deeper and deeper. But if you talk to most people about it, they're only capable of debating what's on the table right now. They cannot and will not recognize the presence of a long term evil plan that keeps accelerating
Soros and the Clintons are members of the church of satan.
you're being uncharitable
the connection between transgenderism and baphomet is there and real - baphomet is depicted as male but with womens breasts
the OP probably has it the other way around, though - christian mythologists depicted different modes of satan after specific sins or behaviors that result in chaos. They obviously recognised an association between defying gender roles with other dangerous, perverted and/or mentally ill inclinations
Tranny cancel culture had no effect on Hogwarts Legacy despite their best efforts. Harry Potter is still a mega franchise. She has fuck you money, she didn't get run over by anyone.
She might be a radical feminist home-teamer but at least she's a radical feminist for REAL women.
Man I’d love to be ran over by that snowball if it gave me the money she rakes in. I’ll take all the death threats in the world for even a quarter of that.
All you have to do is write a few shitty kids books.
I think that's it. She knows she fed that shit. I'm proud of her for not backing down.
Terra is my nation
Deep space is my dwelling place
The stars my destination.
Tiger, Tiger...
Still one of the best science-fiction books ever written.
Apparently, Bester had a copy of a British telephone book, and got all the names he used from villages and suburbs around London.
Properly spelled handle was taken so....
A quote from Gully Foyle.
OLIVIA. OLIVIA PRESTEIGN.
And she does.
Though I never read or watched Harry Potter
I never did either. But then my friend talked me into watching the movies a couple years ago. Not gunna lie. They’re really good.
SNAPE KILLS DUMBLEDORE! 🔥🔥🔥
Well yeah....cause Snape was straight (wanted to bone Lily) so his homophobia was apparent.
Did someone tell her that, and what was her response?
it's like the media and trump.
Maybe Snape didn't kill Dumbledore, but it was actually wizard AIDS?
Close. He was already dying of wizard AIDS, and that's partly why he had Snape kill him first.
Excellent analyses
I see what you did there!!
I don't know whats going on but Wizard Aids sounds like some shit.
It comes after the fourth booster of Pfizer magic
That's that shit that you can't wash off.
Right! Me too! Well played!
I forgot a piece of Wizard Hitler's soul gave him AIDS that effected his hand. But by D&D standards, I suppose Voldemort is a lich?
poof you got Wizaids
"You're a faggot, Harry."
I've heard a couple things, not sure if true or not: she projected a bully of hers onto a Slytherin girl, had that actor changed when she was too pretty, and based Snape on a professor she hated. The rumor was the actor playing Snape planted all these seeds to redeem the character and she took that twist and incorporated it into the last book, whereas those hints in the book weren't there at all.
I don't think it's fair to say she retconned Dumbledore. She got asked a question at an event -- "Did Dumbledore ever find love?" -- and she gave an honest answer -- "I always thought of him as gay." It's globohomo's fault for blowing that up and turning it into front-page news. If we didn't have gay Communists running our media, you never would have even heard about it.
Yes, exactly. That's just how she, as the author, saw this character.
There wasn't one word in the original seven Harry Potter books about Dumbledore, or anyone else, being gay. When you look back, you can see that, yeah, apparently Dumby never married or had a girlfriend. But that's as far as it went.
She is certainly not responsible in any way for this "trans" movement that took off in recent years. A lot of that probably goes to RuPaul's Drag Race, which has been on for many years on VH1 and actually has a big normie following.
Ru did not want to allow any "surgically enhanced" contestants on the show, stating that it was only supposed to be the classic drag art of men creating the illusion of being women (which originated in the theater world of the 17th century, if not before).
But Ru got pushed into it by the cancel culture, who turned against him and threatened his long-running show. So now, just about anyone can be on the show. :/
The only hint that Dumbledore was gay was the suggestion that he had a romantic affair with Gellert Grindlewald. They were "Friends," Big Eff. It must be frustrating to trannies that it was no more than a hint. Like most gays, and all literary villains, they like to believe that the normal conventions and self controls don't apply to them.
Is it really retconn if it never came up or mattered? Like - I understand if Dumbledore had a strait relationship in Canon before, but AFAIK he didn't, so him being gay is kinda a non issue imo.
And insinuated that Hermione is black, despite her own writing portraying her as white.
There are numerous references to Hermione's brown hair, brown eyes, and pale skin in the books. Her face is pale enough to be repeatedly described as white when she is scared, and as pink when embarrassed.
You can find leftists all over the internet though using mental gymnastics to claim that a pale complexion has nothing to do with skin color! Absolute fucking Clown World.
The game literally has tranny characters in it. Plus black characters in a time period where there would not be any black characters.
It's hilarious how that developer created a whole voiced character, with mocap, to please a vocal minority (<1%) of the player base. In fact, the one's they tried to please boycotted the motherfucker. I really wish people weren't complete cucks
Did the mocap capture them walking like a man or a woman? Feet together or in a v when standing? kek
It's not a 1% they are pleasing, it is a 50%, as in the liberals, they are all overjoyed to see the trannys.
Because they want to market to blacks and the woke crowd. It's as simple as that. People won't shut up about either and the best way to sell copies is to dive headfirst into that shitstorm and let the haters and zealots elevate your product.
There's a mixed race lesbian marriage.
Should read the books. Around the end of 4 and all of 5 on it gets 1984 level political.
Not reading this dumb bitch's gay books.
The books are extremely heterosexual. They've got sexual banter in them the left wouldn't just consider sexual harassment but verbal rape.
Wasn't enough for me (liked the series for the characters so the game has no appeal to me) but I gave her plenty of money in the past, and promised my kid a trip to Epic Universe when it opens.
Epic Universe looks like it will be be awesome. Hopefully when it opens it wrecks Disney into oblivion.
I bought it too, actually did enjoy it. Though the developers did add a TransFaggot character to the game. Which is funny cause the trans fags were so giddy to get the game banned/delisted because of “Transphobia”
I enjoy watching libs tear themselves apart over this. Eventually, maybe they'll all realize that Harry Potter is surprisingly conservative - the ideal family has seven kids, the government is incompetent at best, and the solution to the ills of the world is to form a militia.
That's what amazes me about all of the lefties that love Harry Potter. It is extremely conservative and they don't even see it.
if liberals were capable of self-reflection or analytical thinking they would cease to be
This should be carved in stone and displayed somewhere prominent.
They think that being a wizard/witch in Harry Potter and living in a world full of magic, that is hidden from muggles, is a metaphor for being LGBTFAGGOTRY. They see that world as them being oppressed and having to hide from the real world, because normal people just wouldn't understand.
They also really like the idea of their fagworld secretly being in control of the real world, and crushing muggles under their feet (as seen in that statue in the ministry of magic) as how things should really be.
but yeah, mostly it's about thinking that a man taking a dick in every hole is magic.
That requires the ability to think for themselves, which sadly Leftists are incapable of.
I never got to watch the series of movies back in the day so I just recently finished watching all of them. What I got out of the Harry Potter movies was an occult version of the life of Jesus Christ. A chosen one, miracles (magic), fighting evil, dying and coming back from the dead, a man who became a world legend.
The movies gloss over and make absent the political sides of the books. Ie how the media in the wizarding world lies and smears good people on behalf of the "ministry" and the ministry is completely riddled servants of the evil entity but they use the media and lies to manipulate the broader perspective. Sound familar?
The ministry sends out assassins to kill people then lies about it, even to the point of almost prosecuting the accusers. Rigs court hearings so that people automatically lose them without being given a fair chance to defend themselves, or even stand trial at all by moving dates forward without notice etc. Sends in agents to the school to spy on everyone, take over, get people to spy on each other, shut down any association groups over 2 people, stop professors from even saying anything at all that isn't in their lectures. And changes the laws for all of these live in reaction to live events all while under the pretense of "plausible deniability" for the school's best interests. Sound Familiar?
Can concur; that's exactly what the books are about. The kids are forbidden to learn to use their magic to defend themselves, so they basically form a militia to teach themselves. In the end, they have to stand up to the Great Evil largely on their own - and they do.
It's actually pretty great, and surprisingly conservative.
I think the movies still get the gist of the political stuff across to the viewers. Let's be honest, every single person hates the Lawful Evil little cunty pink toad bitch far more than the literal genocidal terrorists.
I just yesterday finished the book and movie. In the movie they make her all about stopping people from kissing and wearing their clothes properly. In the book you actually feel the weight of the corrupt government coming down on a specific group and reacting in real time to them.
That is also called The Hero's Journey and is widely seen in the great mythological stories. The original Star Wars films were closely based on The Hero's Journey.
Your comment reminded me of Norm Macdonald schooling some dumb comedian. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ebfjuk2fHJo
Yup the books are actually conservative and Christian. And in book 5 it’s 1984 level political with secret society militias as the solution.
Respectfully, I'd be interested if you'd expand on what you found to be "Christian" in the books; I agree about their conservative slant. (I have read all of the books. I think Rowling is a tremendously talented storyteller.)
One thing I do find both interesting and appealing is that there is no trace of demonic (or "divine") entities there; HP's magic seems to rely chiefly on one's DNA combined with a totem (a wand, a macguffin) and speaking the proper words. There is no appeal to supernatural spirits by name - not so much as a "by the hoary hosts of Hoggoth" - and this exclusion allows the reader to regard the "magic" as being perhaps akin to the Arthur C. Clarke's definition of it as science we don't fully understand.
Of any kind of definitive or even subversive theology, however, I found none. (It's perfectly possible I missed it, though; I read 'em for fun, I didn't analyze 'em.)
Christmas is always celebrated in every single book. It's a huge thing and is emphasized in many different ways in each book. Ie in the 5th book "Christmas was a huge thing for Sirius. His life of complete gloom was brightened by the max that everyone was staying over from christmas that year".
In the 4th they mention the name of the christmas songs that were played at hogwarts. They weren't just christmas songs, but ones that recognized christ and god. That choice wasn't by mistake.
And most of the books recognize easter every year as well.
I see! Thank you very much sir.
I heard Harry Potter was Christian first from Norm McDonald. From this clip where he was judge on a comedy show. If one watches the films with this correlation in mind one can see the metaphor easier.
https://youtu.be/Ebfjuk2fHJo
I think about how it’s common knowledge that the C.S. Lewis Narnia books are related to the Bible, often as a stark criticism. Yet the same is at play with Harry Potter and society sees not. I wonder if that’s how the Narnia books were perceived at the time of creation or not. Something fun to research for later.
Lewis was dinged by some critics at the time for including Father Christmas in what was accepted to be a Christian allegory, and Lewis' response was something akin to "Lighten up, Francis." (I agree with Lewis.)
Evidently one of those critics was J.R.R. Tolkien: https://www.narniaweb.com/2017/12/does-father-christmas-belong-in-narnia-jrr-tolkien-didnt-think-so-talking-beasts/
Edit: Further research indicates that Santy might have been included for more than just "because Christmas is fun" reasons: https://www.theolatte.com/2017/12/father-christmas-in-narnia-what-on-earth-was-lewis-thinking/
Try this: https://www.holyblasphemy.net/jesus-christ-and-the-deathly-hallows-christian-symbolism-in-harry-potter-7-movie/
And better: https://www.hogwartsprofessor.com/johngranger/#:~:text=Described%20by%20TIME%20as%20the%20%E2%80%9C%20Dean%20of,and%20explaining%20why%20readers%20love%20the%20Potter%20Saga.
Thanks very much! That first link does spell it out pretty simply:
I find it interesting that many of the links contained in those pages lead to sites/pages that do not, now exist. Purged, perhaps. Also I'm going to have to research the "mark" on Christ's forehead; never heard of that one. Perhaps it's a Catholic thing? (Or refers to Revelation, but then Christ/Harry would certainly NOT have had it.) Nonetheless, interesting! Thanks again!
In book 4 they give the name of some of the christmas songs they played and they were explicitly ones that recognized christ and god. That's when I knew that they weren't just recognizing christmas, but these were christian books.
Also on and off they recognize easter in the books too.
In case you haven’t seen https://youtu.be/Ebfjuk2fHJo
HILARIOUS! Also might have been nice if he actually read the Harry Potter books, just another libtard.
I have no idea how anyone reads through Harry Potter and still thinks it's a good idea to blindly trust the government.
Also while every other student is blindly reading the Daily Wizard, Luna Luvgood is slappin infowars.com bumper stickers all over Hogwarts, getting mocked the entire time, and then being right about ABSOLUTELY FUCKING EVERYTHING.
Harry getting close to Luna after that NYT witch keeps writing hit piece after hit piece on him and doing nothing but gotcha questions is really slapping the reader over the head with it. The whole series is one the biggest disclosures in pop culture since George Lucas' Star Wars films
Narcissist shitlib white girls look past all of this of course. For them the series is nothing but confirmation that only a few special people like them are magical inside where they can live their whole lives safely inside an academic fairytale.
Rowling is wildly anti-authoritarian, which is a good thing, though she goes a bit far by throwing ALL organized religion into that mix. That aside, she was against the forced jabs, the lockdowns, and may even be pro-gun. I say the latter because of instances of wands used for self-defense and the government being overbearing on their use for self-defense.
Also of note, the American wizards are, intentionally, a fascistic organization. Rowling has said they are a mirror image of the freedom-loving non-magic Americans. Wizards in America have to endure massive wand-regulation akin to the liberals' anti-gun laws wet dreams.
Just interesting how she has some "conservative views" that many glance over.
Also Molly is a homemaker and her husband works.
And the media in HP is caricatured relentlessly.
There’s even a national inquirer-type conspiracy paper that is the only one publishing the truth.
No shit, they want to erase women.
And men
Unless the men pretend to be women.
The question is how they will be challenged...
Heads on Pikes?
Gallows?
I myself like the idea of bring back executioners with axes... they could fulfill last requests of removing genitalia on the way out.
You wont die a lady... just a Unix.
If society could be so lucky.
Without women, society cannot exist... we are already seeing that. The leftists are castrating males and forcing females to abort. With such low birth rates, society will collapse.
Society could exist happily without women's spaces, endless whining and joke sports.
Maybe if women were pushed back hard enough, there wouldn't be sections in company financial reports talking about goals to reduce male hires.
Reparations for men.
Women naturally desire a subservant, maternal role but are taught this is not acceptable and even the worst thing they can do with their lives. This is the single most poisonous thing about our current society for women. Their instincts tell them one thing and their eyes and ears tell them another. Men have their own set of issues as well. We naturally want to destroy and build, but are now told that is toxic masculinity.
Remove these two lies, and society will start to heal.
If women not being subservient is destroying society, then it must be that women naturally destroy rather than men.
Oh, that's a good one.
Absolutely LOVE that she has refused to back down. Rowling has said that she's completely unfazed by the effect her comments have had on her legacy. Honestly, I never paid much attention to JK Rowling. I've never read any Harry Potter books or watched the movies, but I'm a Rowling fan simply because of this. And I know she's a leftist. I know the vast majority of her beliefs are completely in contrast to my own. But her strong, persistent stance on this single issue, against a mob of her own fanbase, has made me a fan. How often do you see a celebrity completely alienate the entirety of their supporters by standing against a leftist cause? Especially when they could've said nothing and kept all of that support.
She hasn't lost her fan base, and never will. Harry Potter is a cultural icon now, deeply ingrained into people's lives (mostly women), much like any cultural icon. If there were that much backlash, the campaign by the ugly men in dresses against Hogwart's Legacy would have failed - but instead, it sold record breaking numbers of copies.
And, I urge people to go and find old interviews with her. She's not a radical leftist, never was. Her reputation and past at this point has been aggressively retconned by the media to favor wierdo men in makeup and dresses, who are a small fraction of her fanbase, and society.
Other than groomers in makeup and high heels, the only other group that has abandoned her are the rich, spoiled asshole actors and actresses that she made famous and wealthy.
I know Helena Bonham Carter said something along the lines of wanting people to leave Rowling alone and quit being hateful toward her, and Evanna Lynch has also agreed with Rowling after (imagine leftists doing this) reading stuff and doing research. Have any of the other actors or actresses stood with her?
I know about Evanna, don't know about the others - other than the main three being steadfastly in Warner's pocket and denouncing her.
I don't really care about them, because they're of no worth anyway, none of them have done anything of merit since the Potter movies. They're just actors, who will never miss a bill or a meal the rest of their lives, living in extreme comfort thanks to Rowlings.
The bigger picture to me is to go back and look at what Rowlings has actually said, regarding trannies. It's nothing. There was no attack, no bigotry, other than agreeing that male/female is a thing biologically. And she wrote a book under a pen name that had a cross dressing murderer, which is pretty common in movies and books.
That three very spoiled, mid tier at best actors are upset about a manufactured drama is irrelevant, other than they're just the most notable useful idiots in the whole thing.
I recall reading that she had been completely severed from the Harry Potter fan community.
Well, that's what the media wants you to believe. But the sales of the game indicate otherwise. And, the continues sales of her books, the movies, the merch, and tickets to the Harry Potter stuff at Universal.
The impression that I had was that avid Harry Potter fans are still avid Harry Potter fans, but many are no longer fans of JK Rowling. They still love the series and purchase the products, but no longer hold Rowling in high regard. From my understanding, she's no longer welcomed at fan events and had no direct involvement with the videogame. I may have used a bit of hyperbole when I said that she's alienated the "entirety" of her fanbase, but it seems to be a significant portion in my eyes.
The fans still adore Harry and the Wizarding World, but it's true that they did turn against Rowling. There was a TV special a year or two ago that reunited the movie actors and filmmakers and Rowling was pointedly not invited. I think they reluctantly mentioned her name one time, at the very start, but that was all.
A big portion of the fanbase has made the mental leap of fully splitting off Rowling from the Wizarding World. They act as it all of that just exists on its own and she had nothing to do with it. It's ridiculous and contemptible, but that's what they've done.
The fanbase did not fail to invite her, Warners and HBO did. Again, Warners controls the movie rights and all that, and they own HBO. They announced to the press that JK had nothing to do with the game. This is not the fans, this is Warners. THEY didn't invite her.
And, I would bet you a lot of money that the vast majority of fans were not happy about it, but didn't say anything out of fear of a backlash, with the cancel culture bullshit for many years now.
Again, the sales of the game indicate that one, the fans won't let trannies keep them away, and two, they don't care about the fake drama over Rowlings being literally Hitler. I just haven't seen anything from the fans themselves to back up what you're saying - if anything, they have no voice in this at all.
It's clearly not the entirety, but only a small minority that pretends to represent more people than they actually do.
Agreed on all other points, though.
Could be. That certainly holds true with the general population. But I'd be willing to bet that avid Harry Potter fans generally lean far more left-wing-pro-trans than the general public. I have no evidence to support that, just personal experience.
There's the bully left and the ideological left. I can stomach the ideological left. The bully left needs to die in a fire.
She’s got fuck you money, so that helps. She lost me a bit adding all sort of early woke stuff to the lore in interviews but in hindsight it was nothing compared to what’s peddled today and she’s come around with some strong positions, so she’s gucci in my book.
You do not have to think long and hard to figure out the transgender movement is a collection of mentally ill psychopaths
"...mentally ill psychopaths" is about right.
https://www.takimag.com/article/the-truth-about-pervs/
This all sounds like autism tbh
Yeah, no. That's all bullshit.
Here's feminism advocating using it as a weapon against males in 1968.
It is amazing that only the mega wealthy are truly safe from cancel culture. All the rest of us are at risk from woke bosses and government entities.
if she was critical of Jews they'd steal all her money by just yoinking it right out of the account.
you know it, I know it, we all know it
and remember, many Jews love Trump. Many Jews hate what the cabal is doing. Implicating all Jews is like implicating all Chinese for the CCP or all whites for the Nazis. Its dumb. But the people in power still dont want you realizing its a group of mostly Jews telling you to erase white people from their own spaces.
Found the yid.
True, although I’m surprised her government hasn’t tried to find a reason to take her down for those beliefs (yet).
Because she's controlled opposition.
Women don't want people to dig too deep into transgenderism, because the history of feminism is full of references to mass castration, going as far back as 1893.
Even the blind can see who is at fault. It's whether society will actually do something.
Challenged? Lol, they are worse than any supposed neo-nazi group. Online harassers need to be rooted out and beaten and/or thrown into a fuckin' river. They are sick fucks without any philosophy other than this completely made up bullshit.
Someone said bad words online so they should be met with violence.
Go back to reddit libtard.
You serious? Didn't you see that story about that Muslim woman fearing for her life because of these psychos?
you lost me at muslim
Have you never encountered one of these psycho trannies? Or are you one?
I believe most women instinctively know this, even if most of those who know are scared of saying so out loud.
Lady... the tranny movement is just a piece of the leftist liberal puzzle. They are all interconnected. It's about instituting communism in America using Marxist tactics. Instead of proletariat vs the bourgeoise, it is BLM vs white people... or LGBTQ vs "cis." And instead of calling it Marxism, it's called DEI, or Equity. It is all interconnected.
Well JK you see this "movement" is actually part of a larger movement called Neo-Marxism, and you can't isolate one little aspect of it that you don't like. The WHOLE FUCKING THING must go, or the whole thing will be imposed on you by FORCE.
It's time for people to wake the fuck up and re-embrace FREEDOM.
She paved the way for this to happen. Good on her for sticking to her guns on this, but she buttered her bread
DEFEND THAT TERF. It's a losing maneuver, but better than LGBTP rout... The already-lost-but-only-defensible-line was Nuclear Family withal its trad-wifery and full-on gender roles.
Too little, too late, but not as bad as it could be, O Rowling.
The fact that she needed to think about it concerns me. It's pretty simple really . Child mutilation by force or choice is evil.
Grooming children into transgenderism is horrific but it doesn't stop there. It has to be stopped completely. It is also evil to allow tranny men to publicly display their sex fetish and force everyone else to participate. It's evil to encourage young women to use gender bending as a therapy for depression.
Awesome redemption arc.
They want to sexualize your kids because they want to have sex with your kids.
Not only dangerous, but evil. People have to stand up to evil as it is transforming our society into a death cult.
People are generally uncomfortable with the idea that evil operates on the common, mundane, personal level. They prefer to think of evil as remote and rare, the big bad; not something they interact with on a daily basis. Certainly not a subtle spirit of deception that needles insecurity and pride and calls them to blindness.
How long and hard do you have to think to come to the conclusion that water is wet??
This is the only thing so far I agree with her on that I know of. But when a crazy leftist is even saying this shit has went to far. Well it's went to far.
Trans women are men. Everyone knows it, even themselves.
That's a very bold and clear statement. She's possibly the most famous person to make such a clear statement and draw that clear of a line.
I disagree with her on a lot of stuff, but I have to respect her for that.
I'll never forget seeing some anti-gun faggots in DC protesting after some school shooting. They were wearing Harry Potter robes, holding wands, and holding signs that said "The Harry Potter generation does not like guns!"
In Harry Potter, there is literally a class that's called "Defense Against The Dark Arts," which teaches the kids how to use their wands as weapons to protect themselves. LOL. And let's not forget the entire fucking plot to the fifth book altogether. There's so much stuff in Harry Potter that is actually conservative that it blows my mind, haha.
She imagined a liberal utopia and found a woke dystopia instead.
That's from "The Witch Trials of J.K. Rowling", the podcast mentioned. I think the podcast is somewhat interesting because they say the quiet part out loud. I don't know what episode that specific quote is from, but it could be in the same one as the following.
From episode 3, "A New Pyre", @ 56:10: JKR: "...an alt-right provocateur, I suppose you would call him.... I think Milo Yiannopoulos was very much an embodiment of the moment where the culture of places like 4chan sort of burst into the mainstream."
Also take into account that the narrator and one of the producers of the podcast is Megan Phelps-Roper, the granddaughter of Fred Phelps, the founder of the Westboro Baptist Church. She has moved way over to the left since then.
JKR also notes some irony. She says her series was meant to criticize, among other things, the way a controlling government can tyrannize an outgroup. This was replicated within many Potter fan groups!
See the mistake she is making here is that you can’t reason with demons. Trump won btw.
She's not wrong. And, now we're gonna get a bigger, louder round of strange, ugly men in dresses throwing a collective tantrum over her saying that. But it's fine - the more they act out childishly and violently, the faster this will turn the collective public against them.
She's faced death threats for simply saying a man can't know what it's like to have a period. And we're supposed to chastise her, and support a bunch of ugly men in dresses crying because biology exists? Fuck that.
On the wall, weirdos.
Notice they only threaten a real woman? Not one threat to men. Fucking pussies.
It helps that she has a fuck-you amount of money and that makes her cancel proof.
She is a 1960's like liberal. Not too many of those around any more.
They dont want acceptance... They already had that. No, they want complete control over us.
There is no belief involved here. This is knowledge.
I know Twitch is full of Low-T virgins but it blew my mind how many people I saw saying this woman was bad BECAUSE she understood basic science....lol
It's anti-woman. The goals is to define transgender men as the true and genuine woman. It's absolutely insane. But, "ye shall be as gods" demands madness in the end. And that's where the are going.
God Bless you
Actually based
This idiot gave into the pressure - changed characters to of color, to gay. This is the vipers attacking the vipers.