842 To the Pro Nooticers (media.patriots.win) posted 76 days ago by JoinTheDiscussion 76 days ago by JoinTheDiscussion +845 / -3 94 comments download share 94 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
The million people missing are replaced by the millions flooding over our border, and some are even murdered and kidnapped by their replacements. Substitution delays noticing the absence pool growing...
That's beside the point. If someone you know drops dead, they are not replaced by an immigrant. Not to you. To you they're just gone.
That's real. You didn't imagine that. https://youtu.be/ur9-v76kCAc
It is about missing people, not those dropping dead...
I thought it was too until I read the last sentence. The first line shouldn't say vanished, it should say died suddenly.
VERY VERY GOOD POINT
Yeah, we'll see. I am of the opinion that the 'elite' really fucked up, only getting about ~65-70% of the population triple vaxxed. I think they wanted 99% QUINTUPLE vaxxed.
That was most likely the dosage that would have given the mass die off event they dreamed of.
A higher dose, i.e. less 'boosters' required would have likely been far too 'noticeable'.
I personally don't think they were aiming for a mass die off. I think the myocarditis is an unintended side effect of the sterilization program.
Maybe yeah. The sterilization did seem to take affect with just 1-3 shots.
NHS data showed those who got the shots during pregnancy miscarried and those who got it before pregnancy carried to term. No data on those kids fertility yet though.
but what about reducing fertility as a population? that data is only using people who got pregnant. what about people who are trying and can't? or are now having miscarriage's even though it's been a year since their second jab so it's not considered as a reason?
I didn't make any arguments for or against that. I'm just posting stats, bruh.
yea i'm not arguing with you, i'm just saying they may still have reduced the fertility of the population based on those stats since it's only looking at people who got pregnant.
That seems to be a temporary effect right now.
I came here to say this. Day one of the vax they were all on TV telling us they had to vax every human on earth, not kidding. They were not looking for a 5 or 10% vax culling, this was a side effect that they probably didn't expect.
The vax must have some sort of sterilizing effect that they want everyone to have. Maybe it doesn't even fully show up until the next gen of kids. Maybe most of the kids born to vaxxed parents will be sterile.
This would be the perfect crime because it will take 15+ years to find out that most the kids born in the 2020's are sterile and by then they can have 100 other plausible reasons to shift the blame. The russians did it!!!
This is literally the sole reason i did not get the shot. People kept asking, and i would say, i do not have a right to deprive my unborn daughters of the ability to have their own children one day. People responded with "they wouldn't give us the vaccine if it made your kids sterile" ...
The head of Pfizer is a former veterinarian, they tested the wild horse infertility shot around here where I live
they sent the placebos into the cities and the extra concentrated doses to rural communities. It was targeted, by region.
and imagine Africa didn't really implement the vaxx, and they are not making a big deal one way or another... why would they straight up ignore an entire continent?
Once they remove the white woman from all the interracial couple commercials and replace her with a lizard, the truth will be revealed.
this ACE2 receptor.. anyone dug up any pre-20 research on it?
You mean like when Ralph Baric and the WuHan Batlady were putting ACE2 receptor binding sites into coronaviruses?
You do understand in the West they don't have to do anything for sterilization. Sperm count in humans are declining linearly and increasing in the decline of sperm before covid and before the shot.
There is no need to use a shot to induce infertility, it was already here.
I am aware, but perhaps the trend is too gradual for the elites.
It's not gradual we are talking in 10 to 15 years where majority of males can't sire children and its not stopping in decline. By 2100 there will no possible reproduction by mankind.
More likely is that the males who failed to adapt will die off while the smaller percentage who are unaffected will go on to reproduce. There are still men who by all accounts are totally comparable to men from say 100 years ago. That isn't to say there won't be a population crash though but that remains to be seen. Perhaps medical science will get off its ass and figure what the problem is but the recent events in covid and the war on masculinity give me serious doubts and I honestly believe that many of the worlds elites want a human near mass extinction event.
It's most likely phalates. Those men who live in the country and have metal piping and raise their own food avoiding plastics will be fine, that is my guess. Look at plumbing in modern day homes, its all PEX.
you're forgetting the other 70 shots they have been giving and how they keep increasing... almost in line with the decline...
Do they account for masturbators in these sperm count tests?
This was first large scale Human Test of mRNA Technology . Surprises are what the research looks for. Perfecting new Biodefence Technology is what the Military does. And some believe SACRIFICES must be made.
There really isn't any profit in killing you off. They let things like this fester because they want you to be afraid of them, because it makes you believe that they are actually capable of any of these wizardly feats, and that belief is what gives them power.
Bill Gates favorite game is poker. His favorite move is the bluff.
It's pretty obvious when you seriously consider it.
Immune System as a Service. That and the sterilization is what I think they were after.
But when a generation of vaxxed women realize they are mostly sterile, damn, I reckon a few of em at least will be extremely angry. They will find a way to make it men's fault though. Say its an issue with low sperm count or something, even if these women end up not being able to get pregnant with IVF AND they KNOW they have menstrual 'irregularities'.
We are barely thru the 1-10 years sudden death window
Yep. The Die Off may still be happening. If one person dies in your social circle every year for the next five years, it means the great die off is happening but it's slow enough that most people won't connect the dots. Most people will react with it's been a bad few years or we're getting older type excuses. The excess death rate is worse the older a person gets but people don't suspect anything when the guy at 50 dies of a heart attack or a 60 year old gets a turbo cancer. Most people just accept it and move on. Out of 86 relatives, I was keeping tabs on as of March 2021, six have died. If I wasn't keeping tabs on it and making it a point to talk to them at least once a month, it wouldn't be as noticeable.
I think it was just about the money to most of them.
There's A Huge difference between "vanished with no explanation" and died of #ClimateSuddenly
nope... if you're gone, you're gone
I guess I'm stuck on the vanished with no explanation part. Like X-Files vanished out what?
1 million dead to the clot shot seems a bit low, they were going for 70%
well when half a billion go unborn in the next few years... combined with the 30-50% excess deaths...
With the huge surge in population replacement, you won't notice fewer neighbors, but one day you will look around your neighborhood, scratch your head and wonder "was I always the only Caucasian around here?"
Housing prices will fall. The job market despite the poor economy is going to need employees. Used car prices will fall. Less traffic on the roads. Festivals, parades, things like that will seem to have less people. etc.
Clot shot deaths will continue into 2024. Wonder how those numbers look in Australia.
All those cases of heart inflammation will result in 50% casualties against the globohomes. Give it time. Its 100% coming.
WHO IS JOHN GALT?
"I left it the way I found it"
i mean, technically speaking, if only one person in a social group is gone, there is no pattern. a pattern is defined by repetition, so a one off has no pattern, but it does have a cause. patterns make causes more obvious.
The pattern would be that each social group is losing one, or many are losing one. Which is certainly harder to notice, especially if you aren't following news on this stuff daily.
oh thats what it meant, ok, that works then.
I'd be interested to know more about the Dunbar thing
here you go pede https://www.newscientist.com/definition/dunbars-number/
Thank you, very interesting
and only 2 yrs in
myocarditis takes ~5yrs till death
Around 50% within five years. approximately 85% die within ten years.
I'm going to overdose on schadenfreud when that happens!
We have to endure 3 more years of these idiots? Sigh
the deep state and thier helpers are so good with tech that they can invent items that fail a few days after their guarantee runs out...........'planned obsolescence'......i'd wager they can tweak vaccine behaviour in a similar fashion
I stressed about this factoid about 1 million people missing in the US. I was sure these were kids being raped and killed for political blackmail and other rituals as well as people who figured out too much.
I dug into the numbers more and most of it is stuff like a teen running away and then coming home later. I don't think the number reflects that.
I have been saying this. If everywhere is hiring where is everyone?
no TRUE OFFICIAL explanation
Who disappeared? Why is it being asserted that 1m did?
they no longer breathe
When you die, you don't "vanish". I was wondering if there was some other source of people who seem to have just fallen off the face of the earth. Like, trannies changing their names or kidnappings, or something.
it's a euphemism... unless you believe in magic? or know each individual in the whole country?
Public data sets... tracking large masses of articles... I'm sure there's a way you could make such a claim. That's why I asked.
Tracking large masses of articles.... sounds like something to be paid to do?
If you want that, check out Dr. John Campbell.
If he is not enough, I wish you well on your journey in not finding articles yourself.
yeah did 1m people just poof away?
And this scientific fact is why a certain number of people have to die after getting the jab
I've "gone to ground" as of a few years ago and few people even noticed.
It was very easy to abandon my social life, I just quit going out and visiting people. Fortunately, most of my "friends" were Tolerant Leftists- they are so self-obsessed I doubt it even occurs to them that they haven't seen me in quite some time. The only ones who do contact me on rare occasions are the ones who need applause and validation for their bad behavior, which I don't provide so those "opportunities" are rare.
> Apart from my family, I don't really know many sane/logical people. My Tolerant Leftist "friends" became so hostile and screechy from their TDS symptoms I decided to steer clear of them, which was a very positive life upgrade. Life is much less stressful/more productive, now that I rarely have to tiptoe around their eagerly-offended oversensitivities.
Noticing is forbidden. Nooticing however is not. 😉
It's certainly possible, but do we have some sort of a source for that 1 million people beyond this anonymous screenshot. Sounds like a number someone pulled out of his ass really.
It’s from VAERS I think
Vaers is about vaccine reactions, including deaths. O.P. posted about people disappearing, not excess deaths.
Where are these numbers?
Lame post. Dunbar's number is real, but totally unrelated to this phenomena. Mentioning it is just arrogation. Un-earned legitimacy.
Dunbar's number is usually referenced when discussing how large tribes can become before factions are guaranteed to form. Basically, when the limit of how many fellow tribesmen can be known to you is reached, you can't possibly know enough about all of them to maintain social cohesion the way a tribe normally would.
It's impossible to know how many people would need to die before anyone in particular notices, for precisely the reason OP stated: "normies only notice when..."
It's different for everyone.
SIDENOTE: While I'm sympathetic to the idea that the vaxx could be causing a millions of untimely deaths, strictly speaking there's little evidence that lacks equally compelling alternatives. E.g. A lot of people spent more time at home during Covid, with greater access to junk food. The increase in heart attacks may be entirely due to dietary changes. Plaque in arteries builds up over a long time, but blockages are forming all the time in many people. Perhaps the societal effects of the Covid freakout really did push tons of people over the edge.
sure? could kid a bunch of us here...
i knew theyd died suddenly before they even took the shot
january 2021 mode
What about the knights who say nee?
It is a good shrubbery.
"One million," you say... "vanished," you say... "Source," I say.
~2.8m deaths normal per year now with ~30% excess last year
What does that have to do with your original post? What you posted was about people vanishing, not excess counted deaths.
you sounded skeptical about the number.. 1 million extra vaxx deaths isn't unreasonable.
No. Again you are making an argument that has nothing to do with what you posted. What you posted was not about excess deaths, but excess disappearances. Excess disappearances involves things like hikers being buried in an avalanche when noone knows about it, and people being abducted without any witnesses. I never once disagreed that there seems to be an excess death rate after introduction of these supposed vaccines. If you want to talk about excess deaths, then that should have been what you showed in the original post.