This is retarded, North Korea is the size of Kentucky. It 'says' 800,000 people, more realistically it's 8000 malnourished people doing things rocket man says so their family doesn't get thrown into a labor camp.
They do 2 things.
Counterfeit our money, and larp.
The backbone of a large army is the logistics side. So while N. Korea does have a large standing army it can not fight a sustained war for long. However, they do have enough resources to feed highly trained specialists. And N. Korean specialists are highly trained, fanatical and motivated so they can do some damage in localized regions. But not on a large scale.
NK comes out with statements like this every time something is happening in SK.
And SK just said they would work with japan. NK has a million, million reasons to hate Japan. SK should as well, but both countries are run by UK minions.
Forever wars against goat fuckers with room temperature IQs that pose little threat. The US hasn't fought a real enemy since Vietnam, which was a loss.
He’s talking about fighting someone in our own weight class, not running around after goatherds in dirty bathrobes using ROE that would be more appropriate for a big-city police department.
The US has about 5k tomahawk missiles in it's entire inventory, used about 1k since the 91s. We manufacture less than 200 yearly. Russia shot their equivalent of the tomahawk missiles in Ukraine 5k+ times. Hence all the talk of them running out. They still haven't. Their equipment is able to be used by almost everyone on the field. Our equipment is overly complex and require specialist. (Can especially be seen in terms of artillery). Ukraine is showing us US equipment isn't made for sustained wars. Javelin is another example of a "war changing" weapon being useless in real combat. With only a 19% hit rate at most. The system is also overly complicated with stories of Ukrainians trying to learn how to use it via YouTube videos or just abandoning the system on the field. The US is built on ending wars quick. Russia wars philosophy since WW2 been based on sustained wars. Same with China which was able to push the US back from victory in Korea with sheer numbers. Both countries also got patriotic populations. The US is struggling to recruit. Hard to recruit when the US hasn't fought a just war since the 70s. Those forever wars of Afghanistan and such isn't a sustained war but an insurgency war. Which the US stupidity trained Ukraine for 8 years for. Seeing interviews from the Ukrainians that their training of how to fight an insurgency is useless in current combat. At least the CIA and such are learning from Ukraine but the question is can they change the whole military philosophy before the US get involved fully is another question.
… what? Bruh we’ve been at war nonstop for two decades on the other side of the planet. We have so much shit we just left what we were using for the taliban. What the fuck are you smoking?
WE are the ONLY Conglomerate of Nations that can fight the longest war ever created, mainly because of our Veterans, Hunters, Cowboys, and all the other hard Working people we are....
ALL of the Nations of the entire World combined together couldn't take us down, whether they came En Masse, or in Spurts, it doesn't matter, we 260 Million Fighters, can take all of that heat and one hell of a lot more....
I may be too old to be in the Army, but that doesn't mean I can't shoot like I used to, so hold my beers while I clean my Guns....
The US is so far behind in terms of industrial output its sad. What won us WWII was our manufacturing capability more than anything. We don't have that anymore. China has that. China produces 10x as much steel as the US. Our infrastructure is weak and failing. We don't have the manpower or know how to make things like we used to. People here like to talk big and belive there own propaganda. You should never underestimate an opponent no matter how big or small
China would have no choice but to commit their own military to support North Korea. North Korea’s limitations would mean that by the time meaningful Chinese support arrives, a large portion of their country would be overrun by South Korean (and possibly US) forces.
Why do you actually believe this? I don't think you have a realistic expectation of the US or China's capabilities. It took the US 20 years to lose Afghanistan and a decade long war in Iraq which has changed absolutely nothing. You're also discounting the fact that NK has nukes which they absolutely would use in a US conflict. Are Americans prepared to see tens of thousands of Americans die for nothing?
It is manpower. Similar to Soviet Union during 2nd world war. They had massive amounts of manpower, but was (atleast partly, there are differing oppinions...)relying on US supplying them. This could be the same thing on a smaller scale. Imagine if NK starts sending soldiers to Russia in return for resources. It will have an impact. Humans are a resource.
This is retarded, North Korea is the size of Kentucky. It 'says' 800,000 people, more realistically it's 8000 malnourished people doing things rocket man says so their family doesn't get thrown into a labor camp.
They do 2 things. Counterfeit our money, and larp.
I have to agree.
The backbone of a large army is the logistics side. So while N. Korea does have a large standing army it can not fight a sustained war for long. However, they do have enough resources to feed highly trained specialists. And N. Korean specialists are highly trained, fanatical and motivated so they can do some damage in localized regions. But not on a large scale.
The million man starving army of North Korea.
135 pound conscripts with guns to the backs of their heads.
Not one step back, Pyongyang style?
Maybe china donated some of their remote detonation helmets
This assumes that China isn't backing them, which they definitely would be.
NK comes out with statements like this every time something is happening in SK.
And SK just said they would work with japan. NK has a million, million reasons to hate Japan. SK should as well, but both countries are run by UK minions.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/11/asia/japan-south-korea-us-ties-north-korea/index.html
The US can't fight a sustained war either. We just aren't built for it.
The US is known for "forever wars". Your comment is patently retarded.
We’ve been fighting a couple wars the entire time since the start of WWII. The one thing we excel at is fighting wars that never end.
Forever wars against goat fuckers with room temperature IQs that pose little threat. The US hasn't fought a real enemy since Vietnam, which was a loss.
He’s talking about fighting someone in our own weight class, not running around after goatherds in dirty bathrobes using ROE that would be more appropriate for a big-city police department.
The US has about 5k tomahawk missiles in it's entire inventory, used about 1k since the 91s. We manufacture less than 200 yearly. Russia shot their equivalent of the tomahawk missiles in Ukraine 5k+ times. Hence all the talk of them running out. They still haven't. Their equipment is able to be used by almost everyone on the field. Our equipment is overly complex and require specialist. (Can especially be seen in terms of artillery). Ukraine is showing us US equipment isn't made for sustained wars. Javelin is another example of a "war changing" weapon being useless in real combat. With only a 19% hit rate at most. The system is also overly complicated with stories of Ukrainians trying to learn how to use it via YouTube videos or just abandoning the system on the field. The US is built on ending wars quick. Russia wars philosophy since WW2 been based on sustained wars. Same with China which was able to push the US back from victory in Korea with sheer numbers. Both countries also got patriotic populations. The US is struggling to recruit. Hard to recruit when the US hasn't fought a just war since the 70s. Those forever wars of Afghanistan and such isn't a sustained war but an insurgency war. Which the US stupidity trained Ukraine for 8 years for. Seeing interviews from the Ukrainians that their training of how to fight an insurgency is useless in current combat. At least the CIA and such are learning from Ukraine but the question is can they change the whole military philosophy before the US get involved fully is another question.
"Forever wars" that aren't fought against peer or near-peer opponents.
… what? Bruh we’ve been at war nonstop for two decades on the other side of the planet. We have so much shit we just left what we were using for the taliban. What the fuck are you smoking?
You may recall we've just come out of 20 years of war.
And loss
BULLSHIT!!!!
WE are the ONLY Conglomerate of Nations that can fight the longest war ever created, mainly because of our Veterans, Hunters, Cowboys, and all the other hard Working people we are....
ALL of the Nations of the entire World combined together couldn't take us down, whether they came En Masse, or in Spurts, it doesn't matter, we 260 Million Fighters, can take all of that heat and one hell of a lot more....
I may be too old to be in the Army, but that doesn't mean I can't shoot like I used to, so hold my beers while I clean my Guns....
I agree with this.
As if China wouldn’t make up the difference? 🤔
China can't make up the difference.
Yeah, what was I thinking. Definitely not enough people in China to fill the military ranks /s
Their regular troops defect for a bite to eat.
This is a cope. Backed by China they have almost unlimited resources. The US is who doesn't have the resources
We did. They're now in Ukraine.
The US is so far behind in terms of industrial output its sad. What won us WWII was our manufacturing capability more than anything. We don't have that anymore. China has that. China produces 10x as much steel as the US. Our infrastructure is weak and failing. We don't have the manpower or know how to make things like we used to. People here like to talk big and belive there own propaganda. You should never underestimate an opponent no matter how big or small
China would have no choice but to commit their own military to support North Korea. North Korea’s limitations would mean that by the time meaningful Chinese support arrives, a large portion of their country would be overrun by South Korean (and possibly US) forces.
Why do you actually believe this? I don't think you have a realistic expectation of the US or China's capabilities. It took the US 20 years to lose Afghanistan and a decade long war in Iraq which has changed absolutely nothing. You're also discounting the fact that NK has nukes which they absolutely would use in a US conflict. Are Americans prepared to see tens of thousands of Americans die for nothing?
And they have to get here...
It is manpower. Similar to Soviet Union during 2nd world war. They had massive amounts of manpower, but was (atleast partly, there are differing oppinions...)relying on US supplying them. This could be the same thing on a smaller scale. Imagine if NK starts sending soldiers to Russia in return for resources. It will have an impact. Humans are a resource.
Unless they are aligned with Russia & China
Michigan alone has 750,000 Dear Hunter's with high power rifles. N.K. can bring it, but....
Michigan is ruled by a leftist governor who would turn the state over to N Korea given the chance.
Once the chaos begins … short work.
Whitmer is trying to outlaw any use of guns...
and Dems took both sids of the Captial - so they are going to ram through a ton of anti 2A rules.
Unions voted blue.
Unions are a form of collectivism.
Collectivism leads to socialists.
Socialism leads to communists.
Communists lead to…
"The goal of Socialism is Communism" - - VI Lenin
Genocide?
Which means fuck all since they don't have the manpower to actually take them.
...and that's just Michigan
They have enough conventional artillery directed at Seoul to wipe it out in 48 hours.
That's assuming it all works.
I'm sure. The best weapon against North Korea are K-Dramas
This story is almost definitely bullshit.
But in a darkly funny way, counterfeiting USD and larping also describes the US government.
It will be Chinese troops larping as North Koreans doing the fighting.
...and dying.
The US military is malnourished trannies and leftists too who all took multiple death injections, so its not exactly top notch either.
Lmao and if you didn’t sign up they’d kill you so…
And sell drugs out of their European embassies, if I remember correctly.
8000 that are like legit all UNDER 5ft tall......
Almost all of you have had children that were already taller than damn near all north Koreans by the age of 11 - 11.5
They don't even have a tranny brigade!
Their numbers could be from Chinese reinforcements.
Those are two things our government does nonstop as well.
If they come at you, just tell them someone is hosting a tasty cat BBQ on the next block, and watch them do a 180.
Yeah OK north Korea.. Have fun in fantasy faggot land.
Yes but the Biden admin is already doing it so they can just sit back and watch
They have China feeding them
... for an extra couple of turnips